b6: strong interactions and new physics at the lhc { theory · b6: strong interactions and new...
TRANSCRIPT
B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC – Theory
Leszek Motyka
Hamburg University & Jagellonian University, Krakow
4 March 2009
In quest for theoretical precision:
Overview
Soft gluon resummation for SUSY partice production at the LHC[A. Kulesza and LM, Phys. Rev. Lett. in print]
Higher twists in Deep Inelastic Scattering[J. Bartels, K. Golec-Biernat and LM]
SUSY at LHC
Supersymmetric extension of the SM may be The Theory of physics at Terascale (naturalness,
coupling unification, WIMPS, relation to superstrings)
SUSY spectrum contains new heavy particles: e.g. scalar partners of quarks (squarks) and Majorana
fermions: gluinos
R-parity: only pair production of SUSY particles possible
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model has free parameters, but typically, gg and q ¯q production
processes are expected to have the largest cross sections at LHC
10-2
10-1
1
10
10 2
10 3
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
χ2oχ1
+
t1t−1
qq−
gg
νν−
χ2og
χ2oq
NLOLO
√S = 14 TeV
m [GeV]
σtot[pb]: pp → gg, qq− , t1t−1, χ2
oχ1+, νν
−, χ2og, χ2
oq
Prospino2 (T Plehn)
[T. Plehn, Prospino]
L. Motyka SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 2/14
Need for precise predictions
Direct determination of masses of SUSY partners may be difficult:
• long decay cascades, leading to multi-particle final states
• some final state particles should escape detection
Ways out:
• end-points of kinematic distributions
• kinematic fits
• precise measurement of total cross-sections
In general: total cross sections may provide precision tests of SUSY parameters.
Quality of the tests and parameter determination depends critically on theoretical precision.
LO, NLO results for q ¯q and gg SUSY-QCD corrections are known, but soft gluon corrections are
expected to be sizable beyond NLO
L. Motyka SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 3/14
Squark–antisquark and gluino pair production at LO[Eichten, Dawson, Quigg, 85]
qiqj → q ¯q, gg → q ¯q
qq → gg, gg → gg
L. Motyka SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 4/14
Impact of quantum corrections on sparticle mass determination[Beenakker, Hopker, Spira, Zerwas]
Inclusion of one loop corrections at O(αs) from quarks, gluons, squarks and gluinos
−→ Large NLO K-factors predicted for gg and q ¯q production at the LHC:
K ' 1.3 for q ¯q ar mq = 1 TeV K ' 2 for gg at mg = 1 TeV
Higher order corrections may be sizable
L. Motyka SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 5/14
Soft gluon corrections at one loop
Velocity of produced particle in the c.m.s. β =
q
1 − 4m2
s , at threshold β → 0
Energy ω of emitted real gluon close to threshold is kinematically limited, ω < mβ2 � m
−→ lack of cancellations between real and virtual corrections
Iteration of soft gluon contributions leads to a tower of corrections
δσ ∼ σ(0)
αns log
2nβ
| {z }Leading Logarithmic
δσ ∼ σ(0)
αns log
2n−1β
| {z }Next to Leading Logarithmic
Resummation of soft gluon effect is based on the Renormalisation Group approach [Sterman, Catani]
Resummed cross sections incorporate quantum corrections at all orders of perturbative expansion
In part of phase space αs log2 β > 1 −→ resummation is necessary
L. Motyka SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 6/14
Production of gg at the LHC at NLL accuracy
We obtained one-loop soft anomalous dimension matrices (color space) for qq → gg and gg → gg
Relative NLL correction beyond NLO
KNLL − 1
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.2 0.5 1 1.5 2
K NLL
- 1
mg [ TeV ]
a)
~
r = 0.5 r = 0.8 r = 1.2 r = 1.6 r = 2.0
r = mg/mq
Scale dependence
σ(ξm)/σ(m)
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0.2 0.5 1 1.5 2
σ(ξµ
0) /
σ(µ 0
)
mg [ TeV ]~
a)
ξ = 1/2
ξ = 2
NLONLL matched
m/2 < µR = µF < 2m
For large gluino mass, sizable effects of soft gluons and
reduction of theory error by factor of ∼ 3
L. Motyka SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 7/14
Production of q ¯q at the LHC at NLL accuracy
Relative NLL correction beyond NLO
KNLL − 1
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.2 0.5 1 1.5 2
K NLL
- 1
mq [ TeV ]~
b)
r = 0.5 r = 0.8 r = 1.2 r = 1.6 r = 2.0
r = mg/mq
Scale dependence
σ(ξm)/σ(m)
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0.2 0.5 1 1.5 2
σ(ξµ
0) /
σ(µ 0
)
mq [ TeV ]
ξ = 1/2
ξ = 2
~
b)
NLONLL matched
m/2 < µR = µF < 2m
Modest correction, modest reduction of scale dependence
SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 8/14
Probing proton structure in γ∗(Q2)p scattering (DIS)
OPE for hadronic tensor and twists: W µν =X
τ
„Λ
Q
«τ−2 X
i
Cµντ,i ⊗ fτ,i(Q
2/Λ2)
At large scale, Q2 �2, leading twist, τ = 2, dominates −→ universal parton densities
At fixed Q2 importance of higher twist operators in QCD increases quickly with√
s
Reason: rapid evolution of higher twist operators at large Q2 and small x ' Q2/s (∼ 10−3)
Gluons:Twist 4
Twist 2∼
1
Q2R2exp
„q
b log(Q2) log(1/x)
«
Higher twists −→ corrections to main HERA observables: FT and FL, related to cross sections for
virtual photons with T and L polarisations and to F2 = FT + FL
Goal: determination of higher twist corrections to F2 and FL at small x
−→ more precise determination of parton densities from HERA data −→ input for LHC
SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 10/14
Evolution and coupling of higher twist gluon operators
At small x the dominant contribution
comes from diagrams that are enhanced by
powers of large gluon density
High energy factorisation leads
to color dipole picture
V(z,p) V (z,p’)
k−k1 1
k2
*
r2−k
Quark box diagram + multiple scattering cross section −→ saturation model
σL,T (x, Q2) =
Z ∞
0
dr2Z
dz˛˛˛ΨL,T (z, r2)
˛˛˛
2
| {z }Photon wave function
σd(x, r2)| {z }color dipole
cross section
Assuming independent scatterings: σd(x, r2) = σ0[1−exp(−r
2αs(C/r
2) xg(x, C/r
2)/σ0)]
SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 11/14
Generic features on twists 2 and 4 in F2, FT and FL
Twist decomposition derived using Parsival formula in
Mellin space
σT,L p(x, Q2) =
Z
Cs
ds
2πiσ(x, s) Ψ2
T,L(1 − s, Q2)
f(s) =
Z ∞
0
dr2 f(r2) (r2)s−1
T
Key information about twist 2 and twist 4 contribution is contained in the Mellin poles of the quark
box diagram
FT : twist-2: αs x−λ log(Q2)/Q2 — large, twist-4 : α2s x−2λ/Q4 — suppressed correction
FL: twist-2: αs x−λ/Q2 — small, twist-4: −α2sx
−2λ log(Q2)/Q4 — enhanced correction
F2: twist-2: αs x−λ log(Q2)/Q2
F2: twist-4 : [b(4)T − a
(4)T log(Q2)] α2
s x−2λ/Q4 — correction supressed by the sign structure
SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 12/14
Numerical results
Twist ratios: tw-2/exact
Q2
F T(tw-2
) /FT
GBW - solid BGK - dashed x=3 10-4
Q2
F L(tw-2
) /FL
Q2
F 2(tw-2
) /F2
0
0.5
1
1.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
1
2
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
0.5
1
1.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Higher twist contribution at
x = 3 · 10−4 and
Q2 = 10 GeV2:
FT : ∼ 1%
FL: ∼ 20%
F2: ∼ 1%
Summary
• We found anomalous dimension matrices and soft gluon corrections to total
cross sections pp → gg and pp → q ¯q production at the LHC at the NLL
accuracy, reducing sizably the theory error for pp → gg cross section
• We evaluated twist 2 and twist 4 contributions to FL and FT measured at
HERA, within saturation model of multiple scattering
SFB B6: Strong Interactions and New Physics at the LHC: Theory page 14/14