b)discover.pbcgov.org/pzb/planning/pdf/amendments/rainberrypodbtraffic.pdfdesignation. the net...

Department of Engineering and Public Works

P.O. Box 21229

West Palm Beach . FL 33416-1229

(56 1) 684-4000

FAX: (561) 684-4050

www.pbcgov.com

• Palm Beach County

Board of County Commissioners

Paulette Burdick. Mayor

Melissa McKinlay. Vice Mayor

Hal R. Valeche

Dave Kerner

Steven L. Abrams

Mary Lou Berger

Mack Bernard

County Administrator

Verdenia C. Baker

"lin Equal Opporcunity

Affirmative 11Ction Employer ·

@ printed on recycled paper

August 3, 2017

Dr. Juan F. Ortega, P.E. Wantman Group, Inc. 2035 Vista Parkway West Palm Beach, FL 33411

RE: Round 2018-B Sinai Residences Phase II (aka Rainberry PUD Pod B) Policy 3.5-d Review

Dear Dr. Ortega:

Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study for the proposed Future Land Use Amendment for the above referenced project, revised July 31, 2017, pursuant to Policy 3.5-d of the Land Use Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. The project is summarized as follows:

Location: PCN#:

Size: Existing FLU: Existing Zoning: Existing Use:

SE corner of Glades Road and SR-7 00-42-4 7-19-35-012 -0000; 00-42-4 7-1 9-35-001-001 0; 00-42-47-19-35-002-0010; -0020; -0030; -0040; -0050 34.10 acres Low Residential, 3 dwelling units per acre (LR-3) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Congregated Living Facility; Adult Daycare; Nursing or Convalescent Facility; Assembly; Nonprofit Institutional

Existing Max Potential: Single Family Detached = 102 Dwelling Units Proposed FLU: Medium residential, 5 dwelling units per acre (MR-5) (Pod

Prop. Zoning: Proposed Use: Existing Dev. Potential: Prop. Max Potential: Approved Development:

B) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Expansion of Type Ill CLF Single Family Detached = 102 DUs Single Family Detached = 171 DUs Congregate Care Facility = 538 DUs Assisted Living Facility= 60 Beds Recreational Community Center= 33,984 SF Day Care = 90 Students General Office= 45,000 SF

Net Daily Trips (Existing): 1 ,020 Net Daily Trips (Max): 1710 Net Daily Trips (App.): 3,097 Net PH Trips (Existing): 77 (19/58) AM, 107 (67/40) PM Net PH Trips (Max): 128 (32/96) AM, 170 (107/63) PM Net PH Trips (App.): 235 (168/67) AM, 285 (124/161) PM

Based on the review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed amendment, at maximum potential, wi ll generate less trips as compared to that of the approved development. Therefore, it meets Policy 3.5-d of the Land Use Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan at the maximum potential density shown above.

Dr. Juan F. Ortega, P.E. August3, 2017

Please contact me at 561-684-4030 or email to [email protected] with any questions.

Sincerely,

~/· Quazi Bari, P.E. Senior Professional Engineer- Traffic Division

QB:DS/bc ec: Dominique Simeus, E. I. - Project Coordinator II , Traffic Division

Usa Amara - Senior Planner, Planning Division Khurshid Mohyuddin - Principal Planner, Planning Division Steve Bohovsky - Technical Assistant Ill, Traffic Division

File: General - TPS - Unincorporated - Traffic Study Review N:ITRAFFIC\Development Review\Comp Plan\18-B\Sinai Residences Phase II (aka Rainberry PUD Pod B).docx

This

item

has

bee

n el

ectro

nica

lly si

gned

and

seal

ed b

y D

r. Ju

an F

. Orte

ga P

E u

sing

a D

igita

l Sig

natu

re a

nd d

ate.

Prin

ted

copi

es o

f thi

s doc

umen

t are

not

con

sider

ed si

gned

and

seal

ed a

nd th

e sig

natu

re m

ust b

e ve

rifie

d on

any

ele

ctro

nic

copi

es.

SINAI RESIDENCES PHASE II (AKA RAINBERRY PUD POD B)

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC STUDY

Prepared for:

FEDERATION CCRC OPERATION CORP.

Prepared ry:

WANTMAN GROUP, INC 2035 Vista Parkway

West Palm Beach, FL 33411 Phone: (561) 687-2220- Fax: (561) 687-1110

W\Vw.wantmangroup.com

Revised July 31, 2017 Revised July 28, 2017

July 7, 2017

niWGl.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 1

II. CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ............................................ 3

III. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION .......................................... 4

IV. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 5

a. Test 2 – Five Year Analysis (2022) .......................................................................... 6

b. Long Range Analysis (2040) ...................................................................................... 7

V. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 10

Appendix A: Property Appraiser

Appendix B: Rainberry PUD Master Plan

Appendix C: Rainberry PUD Pods A & B Approved Site Plan

Appendix D: ITE Trip Generation Rates

Appendix E: Internal Capture

Appendix F: Approved Trip Generation

Appendix G: Approved Trip Distribution and Assignment

Appendix H: 2040 Volumes

Appendix I: Development Potential Form

TABLE PAGE

Table 1: Trip Generation Rates and Equations .................................................................... 3

Table 2: Trip Generation – Current Future Land Use ........................................................ 3

Table 3: Trip Generation – Proposed Future Land Use (Maximum Intensity) .............. 4

Table 4: Trip Generation – Pod B Approved Development ............................................. 6

Table 5: Test 2 Net Traffic Impact ......................................................................................... 7

Table 6: 2040 Net Traffic Impact – Maximum Intensity .................................................... 7

Table 7: Level of Service – 2040 Conditions – Maximum Intensity ................................. 9

FIGURE PAGE

Figure 1: Project Location ........................................................................................................ 1

2017-07-31_Rainberry PUD Pod B_CPA Traffic Study_2675.00.docx Page 1

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

There is a proposal for a land use change for Pod B of the Rainberry PUD (AKA the Jewish Federation

Campus). The ±34.10 acre Pod B is located on the southeast quadrant of Glades Road and State Road 7 in

unincorporated Palm Beach County (PBC), Florida. The current Future Land Use (FLU) designation for

the property is Low Residential, 3 units per acre (LR-3). A land use change amendment from the current

LR-3 to Medium Residential, 5 units per acre (MR-5) is being requested. Figure 1 shows an aerial location

of the site in relation to the transportation network.

Property Control Numbers associated with this project are 00-42-47-19-35-012-0000, 00-42-47-19-35-001-

0010, 00-42-47-19-35-002-0010/-0020/-0030/-0040/-0050. Appendix A includes information from the

PBC Property Appraiser’s office for the parcels included in the proposed project while the latest approved

master plan for the Rainberry PUD is included in Appendix B.

Figure 1: Project Location

Glades Road

Stat

e R

oad

7

Site POD

B

Central Park Blvd


Pods A and B of the Rainberry PUD were previously approved for a 65-student private school (AKA

resource center), a 538-bed Congregate Living Facility, a 60-bed Nursing Facility, a 90-adult daycare, a 125-

multifamily units, a 33,984 square foot Recreational Community Center and 45,000 square feet of General

Office. Appendix C includes a copy of the latest approved site plan for the site.

Wantman Group, Inc (WGI) has been retained to evaluate the traffic impact for the proposed Land Use

designation at Pod B of the Rainberry PUD property. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the

traffic impact of the proposed land use change to determine compliance with the PBC – Future Land Use

Atlas (FLUA) Amendment requirements. This analysis includes Test 2 – Five Year Analysis (2022) and Long

Range Analysis (2040).


II. CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION

Project trip generation rates available from the PBC Trip Generation Rates, dated August 13, 2014 and the

ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition were used to determine the project trip generation under the Current Land

Use designation and the Proposed Land Use designation as well as trip generation for the approved

development. Table 1 shows the rates and equations used in order to determine the trip generation for

Daily, AM, and PM peak hour conditions.

Table 1: Trip Generation Rates and Equations

Land Use ITE Code

Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

In Out Total In Out Total

Single Family Detached

210 10 25% 75% 0.75 63% 37% Ln(T)= 0.90 Ln(X)+0.51

Apartment 220 6.65 20% 80% T = 0.49(X) + 3.73

65% 35% 0.62

Congregate Care Facility

253 2.02 59% 41% 0.06 55% 45% 0.17

Assisted Living Facility 254 2.66 65% 35% 0.14 44% 56% 0.22

Recreational Community Center1 495 33.82 66% 34% 2.05 49% 51% 2.74

Private School (K-12) 536 2.48 61% 39% 0.81 43% 57% 0.17

Day Care 1 565 4.38 53% 47% 0.80 47% 53% 0.81

General Office 710 Ln(T) = 0.76 Ln(X) + 3.68

88% 12% Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 1.57

17% 83% 1.49

Table 2 summarizes Daily, AM and PM peak trip generation potential under the Current Future Land Use

designation. The net Daily, AM and PM trips potentially generated due to the Current Future Land Use

designation are 1,020, 77, and 107 trips respectively.

Table 2: Trip Generation – Current Future Land Use

Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour


Single Family Detached 1022 DU 1,020 19 58 77 67 40 107

Net Current FLU Trips 1,020 19 58 77 67 40 107

1 See Appendix D for trip generation rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. 2 34.10 acres x 3 units/acre = 102 dwelling units


III. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION

There is a proposal to change the current Future Land Use from the current LR-3 to MR-5. The proposed

intensity for the site would allow a maximum of 171 Single Family homes. Table 3 summarizes Daily, AM

and PM peak hour trips potentially generated under the Maximum Intensity.

Table 3: Trip Generation – Proposed Future Land Use (Maximum Intensity)

Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour


Single Family Detached 1711 DU 1,710 32 96 128 107 63 170

Net Proposed FLU Trips 1,710 32 96 128 107 63 170

According to Table 3, the net Daily, AM and PM trips potentially generated due to the Proposed Future

Land Use designation under the Maximum Intensity are 1,710, 128, and 170 trips respectively.

1 34.10 acres x 5 units/acre = 171 dwelling units


IV. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

This section evaluates two traffic scenarios for the proposed land use change under the Maximum

Intensity: Test 2 – Five Year Analysis (2022) and Long Range Analysis (2040).


a. Test 2 – Five Year Analysis (2022)

Table 4 shows trip generation for the approved development for Pod B of the Rainberry PUD under the

current FLU. Appendix E includes internal capture worksheets while Appendix F includes trip generation

excerpts from the latest approved traffic for the site.

Table 4: Trip Generation – Pod B Approved Development

Land Use Intensity Daily

TrafficAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour


Apartment4 0 DU - - - - - - -

Congregate Care Facility5 538 DU/Beds 1,087 19 13 32 50 41 91

Assisted Living Facility6 60 Beds 160 5 3 8 6 7 13

Recreational Community Center7 33,984 SF 1,149 46 24 70 46 47 93

Private School (K-12) 8 0 Student - - - - - - -

Day Care9 90 Student 394 38 34 72 34 39 73

General Office10 45,000 SF 716 89 12 101 11 56 67

Sub-Total: 3,506 197 86 283 147 190 337

Internal Capture 4.45% 0.71% 2.97%

Apartment - - - - - - -

Congregate Care Facility 41 0 0 0 2 1 3

Assisted Living Facility 16 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreational Community Center 40 0 0 0 2 1 3

Private School (K-12) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Day Care 24 0 1 1 1 0 1

General Office 35 1 0 1 0 3 3

Sub-Total: 156 1 1 2 5 5 10

Pass-By

Day Care 50% 185 19 17 36 17 19 36

General Office 10% 68 9 1 10 1 5 6

Sub-Total: 253 28 18 46 18 24 42

Net Approved Traffic 3,097 168 67 235 124 161 285

4 Apartment: The number of approved dwelling units is broken into: Pod A: 20 DU (JARC Housing) + 105 DUs= 125 DU 5 As required by Palm Beach County on electronic communication on July 31, 2017. Previously approved traffic analysis included Congregate Care Facility broken into: Pod B: 464 (Independent Living) = 464 Beds 6 As required by Palm Beach County on electronic communication on July 31, 2017. Previously approved traffic analysis included Assisted Living Facility broken into: Pod B: 60 Beds (Skilled Nursing) + 50 Beds (Assisted Living) + 24 Beds (Memory Support)= 134 Beds 7Per ULDC, the three proposed buildings in Pod B: Federation, JFS and JCC follow under the Non-Profit Institutional Assembly category. JCC will offer services similar to a Community Center. 8 Private School: The number of approved students is broken into: Pod A: 65 (JARC - offsite) = 65 Students 9 Day Care: The number of approved students is broken into: Pod B: 90 (Adult Day Care) = 90 Adults 10 Office: As part of a conservative analysis, 45,000 SF of the proposed Non-Profit Institutional Assembly buildings in Pod B were assumed as office use.


Table 5 shows a comparison of the trip generation between the Maximum Intensity under the proposed

FLU and the approved development under the current FLU.

Table 5: Test 2 Net Traffic Impact

Future Land Use Designation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour


Approved Development 168 67 235 124 161 285

Maximum Intensity 32 96 128 107 63 170

Net New Trips (136) 29 (107) (17) (98) (115)

As can be seen in Table 5, no additional Peak-Hour traffic will be expected to be generated by the

Maximum Intensity under the proposed FLU. Test 2 has been met.

b. Long Range Analysis (2040)

Table 6 shows a comparison of the trip generation between the Maximum Intensity under the existing and

proposed FLU. As can be seen in Table 6, the Daily traffic generated by the proposed Maximum Intensity

is higher than the traffic generated by the current FLU.

Table 6: 2040 Net Traffic Impact – Maximum Intensity

Future Land Use Designation Daily

Current 1,020

Maximum Intensity 1,710

Net New Trips 690


Given the net trip generation characteristics from Table 6 for Long Range Analysis (2040), and

according to FLUE Policy 3.5-d of the Comprehensive Plan, the first accessed link on the first access major

thoroughfare should be considered for traffic impact analysis for the Maximum Intensity.

At the time of this submittal, the latest long range transportation model available from the

Metropolitan Planning Organization was dated August 17, 2016. Based on the 2040 Cost Feasible

Plan, net traffic was compared to LOS ‘D’ for existing and proposed lanes. Table 7 shows all links

included within the RDI are insignificantly impacted by the project under the Maximum Intensity in

the year 2040.


Table 7: Level of Service – 2040 Conditions – Maximum Intensity

Road From To Lanes Capacity 2040 Daily

Volume11

Traffic Assignment12

Project Traffic

Total Traffic

V/C % Impact Significant

Impact? Meets LOS

‘D’? 13

Glades Rd SR-7 Site 6D 50,300 41,800

11% 76 41,876 0.83 0.15% NO YES

Glades Rd Site Lyons Rd 6D 29% 200 42,000 0.83 0.40% NO YES

SR-7 Palmetto Park Rd

Site 6D 50,300 67,100

38% 262 67,362 1.34 0.52% NO -

SR-7 Site Glades Rd 6D 22% 152 67,252 1.34 0.30% NO -

Net Daily Traffic: 690

11 2040 volumes are included in Appendix H. 12 Latest approved trip distribution and assignment for the site was used in this analysis. See Appendix G for an excerpt from the approved traffic study for the site dated September 12, 2008. 13 A project has significant traffic: (1) when net trip increase will impact FIHS and SIS facilities which are already exceeding the adopted LOS or cause the adopted LOS for FIHS or SIS facilities to be exceeded; and or (2) where net trip increase impacting roads not on the FIHS or SIS is greater than one percent (1%) for volume to capacity ratio (v/c) of 1.4 or more, two percent (2%) for v/c of 1.2 or more and three percent (3%) for v/c of less than 1.2 of the level of service "D" capacity on an AADT basis of the link affected up to the limits set forth in this table. The laneage shall be as shown on the MPO’s latest adopted LRTP.


V. CONCLUSION

There is a proposal for a land use change for Pod B of the Rainberry PUD (AKA the Jewish Federation

Campus) located on the southeast quadrant of Glades Road and State Road 7 in unincorporated Palm Beach

County (PBC), Florida. The proposal is to change the current Future Land Use from the current Low

Residential, 3 units per acre (LR-3) to Medium Residential, 5 units per acre (MR-5). The proposed

requested land use change will allow a maximum density and intensity of 171 Single Family homes. The

proposed land use would be expected to generate a maximum of 690 additional external net Daily trips.

Appendix I includes a copy of the Development Potential Form – 2016 Future Land Use Atlas

Amendment Application.

The proposed changes to Pod B of the Rainberry PUD property have been evaluated following FLUE

Policy 3.5-d of the PBC Comprehensive Plan. This analysis shows the proposed Future Land Use Amendment

will be in compliance with Policy 3.5-d of the Land Use Element of the PBC Comprehensive Plan.

Appendix A: Property Appraiser

Location Address 21010 95TH AVE S

Municipality UNINCORPORATED

Parcel Control Number 00-42-47-19-35-012-0000

Subdivision RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B & C REPL NO 1

Official Records Book Page

Sale Date

Legal Description RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B & C REPL NO 1 TRS L-1 & L-2 K/A STORMWATER MGMT

OwnersJEWISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES CORP

Mailing address

9901 DONNA KLEIN BLVD BOCA RATON FL 33428 1756

No Sales Information Available.

No Exemption Information Available.

Number of Units *Total Square Feet 0 Acres 1.9603

Use Code 9500 - RIVER/LAKES Zoning -

Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Improvement Value $0 $0 $0

Land Value $0 $0 $0

Total Market Value $0 $0 $0

All values are as of January 1st each year

Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Assessed Value $0 $0 $0

Exemption Amount $0 $0 $0

Taxable Value $0 $0 $0

Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Ad Valorem $0 $0 $0

Non Ad Valorem $0 $0 $0

Total tax $0 $0 $0

Page 1 of 1

6/23/2017http://www.co.palm-beach.fl.us/papa/Asps/PropertyDetail/PropertyDetail.aspx?parcel=004...






Sale Date

Legal Description RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B & C REPL NO 1 TR A-1 K/A PRIVATE ST


Mailing address





Use Code 9400 - R/W - BUFFER Zoning -


Land Value $0 $0 $0








Total tax $0 $0 $0

Page 1 of 1







Sale Date

Legal Description RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B & C REPL NO 1 TR B-1 (LESS SLY 419.98 FT OF NLY 539.44 FT OF WLY 330.31 FT, SLY 240.57 FT OF NLY

OwnersFEDERATION CCRC OPERATIONS CORP

Mailing address




Number of Units 234 *Total Square Feet 528001 Acres 20.6429

Use Code 7800 - SANI/ REST HOME Zoning -


Land Value $3,283,769 $3,127,399 $0

Total Market Value $3,283,769 $3,127,399 $0


Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Assessed Value $3,283,769 $3,127,399 $0


Taxable Value $3,283,769 $3,127,399 $0

Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Ad Valorem $59,045 $58,150 $0


Total tax $60,022 $59,095 $0

Page 1 of 1







Sale Date

Legal Description RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B & C REPL NO 1 SLY 419.98 FT OF NLY 539.44 FT OF WLY 330.31 FT OF TR B-1 (LESS TR L-1)


Mailing address





Use Code 1000 - VACANT COMMERCIAL Zoning -


Land Value $336,969 $320,922 $0

Total Market Value $336,969 $320,922 $0


Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Assessed Value $336,969 $320,922 $0


Taxable Value $336,969 $320,922 $0



Total tax $6,199 $6,102 $0

Page 1 of 1







Sale Date

Legal Description RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B & C REPL NO 1 SLY 240.57 FT OF NLY 865.15 FT OF WLY 345.89 FT OF TR B-1 (LESS L-2)


Mailing address





Use Code 9400 - R/W - BUFFER Zoning -


Land Value $235 $235 $0








Total tax $51 $49 $0

Page 1 of 1







Sale Date

Legal Description RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B & C REPL NO 1 S 395 FT OF W 300 FT OF ELY 715.70 FT OF TR B-1


Mailing address



Exemption Applicant/Owner Year DetailJEWISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES CORP 2017 FULL: CHARITABLE/BENEV/FRAT


Use Code 7200 - PRV SCHL/COLL Zoning -

Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Improvement Value $2,465,147 $2,275,503 $0

Land Value $425,455 $405,195 $0

Total Market Value $2,890,602 $2,680,698 $0


Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Assessed Value $2,890,602 $2,680,698 $0

Exemption Amount $2,890,602 $2,680,698 $0



Non Ad Valorem $4,534 $4,575 $0

Total tax $4,534 $4,575 $0

Page 1 of 1


Location Address





Sale Date

Legal Description RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B & C REPL NO 1 SLY 665.30 FT OF WLY 340.70 FT OF ELY 415.70 FT OF TR B-1


Mailing address





Use Code 1000 - VACANT COMMERCIAL Zoning -


Land Value $731,490 $696,658 $0

Total Market Value $731,490 $696,658 $0


Tax Year 2016 2015 2014Assessed Value $731,490 $696,658 $0


Taxable Value $731,490 $696,658 $0



Total tax $13,386 $13,178 $0

Page 1 of 1


Appendix B: Rainberry PUD Master Plan

Appendix C: Rainberry PUD Pods A & B Approved Site Plan

COURTYARD

20' PBCDE(ORB 12340, PG 1641)

10' FPL EASEMENT(ORB 11869, PG 1)

12' BUFFER

75' LANDSCAPEBUFFER

(PER COND. H.1)-SEE DETAIL A-

4' EXCLUSIVEEASEMENT

(ORB 9734, PG 750)

15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEE DETAIL C

10' UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT

95TH

AV

ENU

E

15' ROW BUFFER(SEE DETAIL C)

10 10 10 10 10 10 10

9

10 10 10 10 10 10

9

9

86

10

10

LOA

DIN

G

7

LOADING

8

8

9

6

10

6 6

5

10

6

ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT INST.2-STORIES20,000 SF

9'

18.5'

18.5'

18.5'18.5'

9'

9'

9'

9'26'

26'

26'

26'

26'26'

26'

26'

26'

26'24'

24'26'

15' BUFFER EASEMENT(ORB 12340, PG 1641)

LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT L-46

30'

PBCUELIFT STATION ESMT.(ORB 12340, PG 1634)

LAKE SURFACE0.72 AC.

20' L.M.E.12' SLOPE (MAX 4:1)

ENTRY TOPARKINGGARAGE

ASSEM. NONPROFIT INST.3-STORIES33,984 SF

BLDG HEIGHT MAX. 35'

INDEPENDENT LIVING BUILDING, 464 BEDS 2,000 SF OFFICE4-STORIES 397,200 TOTAL SF

COVERED PARKING - 90,000 SF ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY50 BEDS 2,000 SF OFFICE

3 STORIES 62,000 TOTAL SF

MEMORY SUPPORT24 BEDS, 1,000 SF OFFICE

3 STORIES 87,000 TOTAL SF

COURTYARD RECREATIONAREA

25,922 SF

LIMITS OFCOVEREDPARKINGBELOW

8' F.P.

5' F.P.

5' F.P.345'

FRONTSETBACK

45'SIDE STREET

SETBACK(25' MIN.)

5' F.P.

8'

8' F.P.

5' S.W.

DUMPSTER5' F.P.

8' F.P.8' F.P.

5' S.W.

24'

5'TURN-AROUND SPACE

8'

RESIDENTIALBOCA LAGO (PUD)

RSHR 8

10

6

9

6

3

8

6 6

7 7

29' LANDSCAPE BUFFERPER COND. G-3

(94 TREES, 660 SHRUB CONT. HEDGE)14' CANOPY TREES, 20' O.C., 24" HEDGE

ON EXTERIOR SIDE OF FENCEINTERIOR TREE REQUIREMENTS: 1/750 SF.

30.5'FRONT

SETBACK25'

R40'20' U.E.

PER PLAT

O' BUFFER(BA 98-36)

6' FENCE

CONCRETEPATIO

9

6 6

116

8

7

2

5

12

112

SERVICECOURTYARD

FLUSH CONC.WALK

35' MIN. REAR SETBACK(BA 9900018)

26'

5' CONC. WALK

4' CONC. WALK

WANDERINGGARDEN

299.91'

S00°00'57"E 16.13'

N00° 01' 09" W

37 0.3 1'

S89°59'21"W 260.00'

N00

° 00'

57" W

4 11.

1 4'

5' F.P.

75' LANDSCAPEBUFFER


75' LANDSCAPEBUFFER


75' LANDSCAPEBUFFER


32' REAR SETBACK(MIN. 20')

1,435

55 (70)

(35) 60

35 (

25)

15 (

5)

551

4 (9)

6 (9)

5 (6

)(1

1) 7

25 (80)

1,435

10 (50)

40 (

30)

(20)

60

ADT

ADT

ADT

25' CORNER CLIPS (TYP)

92 COV.PARKING SPACES

SPABUILDING1-STORY6,266 SF

SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTIAL

FLU:LR-3Z: PUD

PET: 73-053, 74-068RES: 73-306, 74-426

MULTI FAMILYRESIDENTIAL

FLU:MR-5Z: PUD

PET: 83-008RES: 84-60; 83-1083

83-1082; 72-229

MULTI FAMILYRESIDENTIALFLU: HR-12

Z: RMRES: 84-60; 83-1083

83-1082; 72-229

VACANTFLU: MR-5

Z: PUDPET: 84-139, 97-114

RES: 96-645

SCHOOLFLU: LR-3Z: PUD

PET: 97-056, 84-139, 97-114RES: 08-1380; 08-1381

96-645

5'S.W.

BLDG HEIGHTMAX. 60'

BLDG HT.MAX. 35'

BLDG HT.MAX. 35'


90' ULTIMATER.O.W.

BLDG HEIGHTMAX. 35'

BLDG HEIGHTMAX. 60'

BLDG HEIGHTMAX. 60'

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

IACCESS POINT #3

VARIANCE FROM ART. 11.E.9.D.2(LOTS ABUTTING MAJOR STREETS)

REFER TO RESOLUTION NO. ZR-2010-007

ACCESS POINT #2VARIANCE FROM ART. 11.E.9.D.2

(LOTS ABUTTING MAJOR STREETS)REFER TO RESOLUTION NO. ZR-2010-007

ACCESS POINT #1VARIANCE FROM ART. 11.E.9.D.2

(LOTS ABUTTING MAJOR STREETS)REFER TO RESOLUTION NO. ZR-2010-007

7

26' CANAL R/W(ORB 6495, PG 761)(ORB 6495, PG 1165)(ORB 6495, PG 1545)(ORB 6495, PG 1554)

13'-6" CLEARANCEMIN.

25' BUFFER

NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF POD B(PER PLAT BOOK 80, PG 24-26

RAINBERRY PUD PODS A, B, AND C)

A

A

(ORB 1585, PG 505)

N89°59'40"E 1350.69'

TRACT A

TRACT H

TRACT I

SIEMENS JEWISH CAMPUS

(PB 64, PG 136-138)

THE RICHARD AND CAROLE

LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT L-47

(ORB 4399, PG 66)

POD CRAINBERRY P.U.D., PODS A,B, & C

(PB 80, PG 24-26, PBCR)

RAINBERRY POD "D"(PB 86, PG 7-8)

TRACT A

TRACT C

(PB 86, P. 7-8, PBCR)

(PB 80, PG 24-26)

THE TIMBERS OF BOCA(PB 37, PG 156-158)

REPLAT OF BOCA LAGO(PB 31, PG 62-71)

RAINBERRY POD "D"(PB 86, PG 7-8, PBCR)

S89°59'40"W 715.52'

R=25.00'=38°53'49"L=16.97'

N06°07'32"W

234.20'

R=25.00'=37°53'50"L=16.54'

N00°01'09"W 57.53'

N00

° 00'

5 7"W

395 .

00'

N00 °01 '0 9"W

20 6.6 4'

S20°

31'5

8"W

75.8

2'

S89°59'40"W29.11'

S01°15'41"W40.31'

S40°

33'41

"W90

.57'

S56°54'23"W

44.88'

S82°46'55"W 122.65'

300.00'

109.3'

88.5'

143.3'

40.6'

138.2'

40.1'

30' LAKE WORTHDRAINAGE DISTRICT R/W

(ORB 4976, PG 1075)

50' 50'

26'TYP.

LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT L-46(ORB 1585, PG 505)

PBCUE(ORB 12360, PG 866)

9

115.61'

567.29'

ESMT.(ORB 23124,

PG 608)CONC.

HEADWALL

20'

6'SW

CL

CL

CL

5'S.W.

15' L.B.(SEE DETAIL H)

2-STORIES25,000 SF

BLDG. HEIGHT MAX. 35'

ADULT DAYCARE23,000 SF

20 EMPLOYEES, 90 ADULTS

OUTDOORACTIVITY

AREA

MULTI-FAMILY4 STORIES 81,941 SF, 105 UNITS

POD A

BLDG HT.40.5'

RESOURCECENTER

2-STORIES21,290 SF

STUDENTS:32 JARC

65 OUTSIDEPOD A

JARC HOUSING2-STORIES

25,556 SF 20 D.U.POD A

5

LOCAL COMMERCIAL STREET

26'

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTSCREENED FROM ADJ. PROP

MECH.EQUIP.

ON ROOF &SCREENED

150'

50'

11'

8' HT. DECORATIVEFENCE

5'OVERLAP

10'

12'

26'

REQ. SCREENING -SEE DETAIL L-60'

167'

85'148'

BIKE RACK

BIKE RACK

PROP. LEFT-TURN LANE

29'75'

LANDSCAPE

GUARD HOUSE

ONEWAY

10

106 COV.PARKING SPACES

26'

28'

10

526'

8'10

8'8'

19'

26'

OPEN-AIRCOURTYARD

26'

6

9

5

R48'

R20'

48'

10

10

6

5

1065

SKILLED NURSING60 BEDS, 2,000 SF OFFICE

56'

65'

46'

BENCH (TYP)

20'

20'

20'

19'

26'

20'

20'

26' 20'

10' 5'

26'

13'-6"CLEARANCEMIN.

14'

14'

5' S.W.

R20'

R20'

20'

20'

131' SIDE SETBACK(MIN. 20')

LIMITS OF COVEREDPARKING BELOW

PHASE II

LIMITS OFPHASE II

LIMITS OFPHASE II

PHASE II

PHASE II

PHASE II

LIMITS OFPHASE II

LIMITS OFPHASE II

5' WALK

D

DUMPSTERENCL., TYP.

EMERGENCYGENERATOR W/SCREENINGPER ULDC

26'

26'

26'

26'

26'

26'

35'

ENTRY TOPARKINGGARAGE

2ND STORYRESIDENT

COURTYARD

25'

DECORATIVEWALL FEATURE

PATIO,TYP.

PATIO,TYP.

PATIO,TYP.

PATIO,TYP.

PATIO,TYP.

37'

63'

R=65.00'=53°55'32"L=61.18'

5' F.P.

5' F.P.

8' F.P.

8' F.P.

5' F.P.

40' INGRESS & EGRESSEASEMENT

(ORB 9888, PG 113)

15' BUILDINGSETBACK TOSIDE WALK

8' F.P.

5' F.P.

5' F.P.

5' F.P.

8' F.P.

8' F.P.

8' F.P.

5' S.W.

STOP BAR

10 ' PBCUE(ORB 13187, PG 1218)

15' R.O.W. BUFFER(SEE DETAIL C)

DIRECTIONAL SIGN

DIRECTIONAL SIGNDIRECTIONAL SIGN

DIRECTIONALSIGN

DIRECTIONAL SIGN

DIRECTIONAL SIGN

DIRECTIONAL SIGN

DIRECTIONAL SIGN

DIRECTIONAL SIGN

DIRECTIONAL SIGN

119' REAR SETBACK(MIN. 20')

55' SIDESETBACK (20' MIN.)

POD A (NOT PARTOF AFFECTED AREA)

POD A (NOT PARTOF AFFECTED AREA)

N89°59'16"E 30.00'

(PB 80, PG. 24-26, PBCR)PARTIAL ABANDONMENT PER

(ORB 10856, PG. 1563, PBCR)EASEMENT REALIGNED PER(ORB 12340, PG. 1641, PBCR)

ABANDONED PER(ORB 23005, PG. 1505, PBCR)

AFFECTED BYMAINTENANCE COVENANTS(ORB 23298, PG. 1880, PBCR)

RECIPROCAL EASEMENT PER(ORB 24636, PG 1084, PBCR)

R=2305.00' =6°06'23"L=245.66'(P,LD&M)

CB=N03°04'21"WCD=245.54'

N00°01'09"W 4.00'N89°59'40"E 21.44'

N06°07'32"W

273.26'

MECH.EQUIP.

SCREENED

92.73'

N00°01'09"W

279. 99'

12' SLOPE

20' L.M.E.

12' SLOPE

20' L.M.E.

D

DDUMPSTERS ANDTRASH COMPACTORSCREENED FROM VIEW

22'

22'

10'

130°'

130°'

R28'

R48'

R49'R49'

8'22'

R48'

R48'

WANDERINGGARDEN

TRACT LINE

10' x 30' BUS EASEMENT(ORB 22690, PG 1899)

15'


(ORB 12395, PG 1689)

10'

20' PBCDE(ORB 23181, PG 712)

5' L.A.E.

5' L.A.E.

5' L.A.E.

R=57.10'=45°32'40"L=45.39'

R=25.00'=37°41'20"L=15.57'

6'SW

TRA

CT

A- 1

(OR B

24 63 6, PG1 08 4)

TRA

CT

A-1

1.19A

C.

TRA

CT

A-1

(ORB

24636, PG1084)

R=2305.00'=2°49'16"

L=113.50'(P,LD&

M)

CB=S04°42'54"EC

D=113.49'

R=2350.00'

=6°06'23"L=250.46'

VARIANCE FROM ART. 11.E.2.A.2(MIN.LEGAL ACCESS REQ.)

REFER TO RESOLUTION NO. ZR-2010-007

COVEREDWALKWAYFOR WEATHER

PROTECTION ONLY

LAKE SURFACE0.83 AC.

LAKE TRACT0.92 AC.

LAKE TRACT1.04 AC.

10 ' PBCUE(ORB 13187, PG 1218)

20' L.M.A.E.

20' L.M.A.E.

20' L.M.A.E.

20' PBCUE(ORB 12340, PG 1634)

10' PBCUE(ORB 12340, PG 1634)

10' U.E.

TRACT BINGRESS AND EGRESS TRACT

(PB 80, PG 24-26, PBCR)ABANDONED PER

(ORB 10856, PG 1563, PBCR)

TRACT D



TRACT B(PB 86, PG 7-8, PBCR)

ABANDONED PER(ORB 23005, PG 1505, PBCR)

AFFECTED BYMAINTENANCE COVENANTS

(ORB 23298, PG 1880, PBCR)RECIPROCAL EASEMENT PER

(ORB 24636, PG 1084, PBCR)

(PB 86, PG 7-8,PBCR)

15'

30' 45'

(PB 80, PG. 24-26, PBCR)ABANDONED PER

(ORB 23005, PG. 1505, PBCR)AFFECTED BY MAINTENANCE COVENANTS

(ORB 23298, PG. 1880, PBCR)RECIPROCAL EASEMENT PER

(ORB 24636, PG 1084, PBCR)

10'

20' PBCDE(ORB 23181,

PG 712)

45' 45'



TRACT B-130.95 ACRES

TRACT L-10.92 ACRES

TRACT L-21.04 ACRES

ACCESS EASEMENT(ORB 24757, PG 432, PBCR)

13'

MEMORIALPAVILION

OUTDOORKITCHEN

WALL &COMMEMORATIVE

PLAQUE (SEE DETAIL D)

51'

21'

7.5' SETBACK

TRACT 2BOUNDARY

TRACT E15' BUFFER ZONE(P.B. 80, PG. 24-26, P.B.C.R.)

TRACT F(P.B. 80, PG. 24-26, P.B.C.R.)

TRACT G(P.B. 80, PG. 24-26, P.B.C.R.)

ENTRANCE SIGN

3

20' REAR SETBACK

R=57.10'=21°56'07"

L=21.86'(M)

5

1

3

1

10

10

10

310

DIRECTIONAL SIGN

TRACT A-2(0.08 ACRES±)95TH AVENUE

(PB 80, PG. 24-26, PBCR)PARTIAL ABANDONMENT PER

(ORB 10856, PG. 1563, PBCR)EASEMENT REALIGNED PER(ORB 12340, PG. 1641, PBCR)

ABANDONED PER(ORB 23005, PG. 1505, PBCR)

AFFECTED BYMAINTENANCE COVENANTS(ORB 23298, PG. 1880, PBCR)

RECIPROCAL EASEMENT PER(ORB 24636, PG. 1084, PBCR)

R=65.00'=102°24'48"L=116.18'

30' ACCESS EASEMENT(ORB 26785, PG 283)



240'80' 160'0 40'N

S C A L E: 1" = 80'-0"

SITE DATACONTROL NUMBERAPPLICATION NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERNAME OF DEVELOPMENTLAST ZC APPROVAL (ZR-2010-007, ZR-2010-008)LAST BCC APPROVAL (R-2010-1172, R-2010-1173)EXISTING USES

PROPOSED USES

TIERFUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONEXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION

SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGEPCN NUMBERS

84-139ZV/DOA-2011-02350

0560-007RAINBERRY PUD (PODS A&B)

JULY 1, 2010JULY 22, 2010

CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY,JARC HOUSING, RESOURCE CENTER,

MULTI-FAMILY, ADULT DAYCARECONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY,

JARC HOUSING, RESOURCE CENTER,ADULT DAYCARE, NURSING OR

CONVALESCENT FACILITY, MULTI-FAMILY,ASSEMBLY, NONPROFIT INSTITUTIONAL

U/SLR-3

PUD (RESIDENTIAL POD A &PRIVATE CIVIC POD B)

19 / 47 / 4200-42-47-19-26-000-001100-42-47-19-26-000-001200-42-47-19-26-000-002100-42-47-19-26-000-0022

"ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS ANDRELATED DOCUMENTS ARE THECOPYRIGHT PROPERTY OF THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND MUST BERETURNED UPON REQUEST.REPRODUCTION OF DRAWINGS,SPECIFICATIONS AND RELATEDDOCUMENTS IN PART OR IN WHOLE ISFORBIDDEN WITHOUT THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECTS WRITTEN PERMISSION."

FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN

9/5/2013 AGENCY REVIEW

L.D.S. PROJECT SCHEDULEAPPROVALDATE NOTES

2015-07-17_SP_583.8.dwgDRAWING #:

DATE:

FILE #: 583.8

05/05/2015

SCALE:

DRAWN BY:

1"=80'

JRP / RD

SHEET #

FSP.1

PUD PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ULDC TABLE 3.D.2.B-18)

REQUIRED

PROVIDED

0.5 AC

34.10 AC

LOT DIMENSIONS

SIZE WIDTH/FRONTAGE

100'

927'

DEPTH

100'

1321'

MAX.HEIGHT

35'

60'

BLDGCOV.

30%

25.1%*

SETBACKS

FRONT

25'

SIDE

20'

SIDESTREET

25' 20'

REAR

1. FOUNDATION PLANTINGS TO BE PROVIDED ALONG MIN. 40% OF BUILDINGFACADE, 5' ALONG FRONT, 8' ALONG SIDES WITHIN THE EXTENTS SHOWN ON THISPLAN. EXACT LOCATIONS OF FOUNDATION PLANTINGS TO BE DETERMINED ATTIME OF BUILDING PERMIT WHEN LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE PREPARED.

ZONING STAMP

ACAPTSBLVD.COMP.D.U.EX.FLUHT.

LFMIN.MAX.MSNTSO.C.O.H.E.ORB.PG.(TYP)U.E.Z:ZLL

R.O.W.SFSNSUBST.SW

= ACRES= APARTMENTS= BOULEVARD= COMPATIBILITY= DWELLING UNITS= EXISTING= FUTURE LAND USE= HEIGHT

= LINEAR FEET= MINIMUM= MAXIMUM=MEMORY SUPPORT= NOT TO SCALE= ON CENTER= OVERHEAD ELECTRIC= OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK= PAGE= TYPICAL= UTILITY EASEMENT= ZONING DESIGNATION= ZERO LOT LINE

= RIGHT OF WAY= SQUARE FEET= SKILLED NURSING= SUBSTITUTION= SIDEWALK

TOTAL GROSS SITE AREAPOD A

POD BTRACT A-1TRACT B-1TRACT L-1TRACT L-2

TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS POD A (G) MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL POD A (H + I) JARC

TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREAPOD A

EXISTING MULTI-FAMILYEXISTING JARCEXISTING RESOURCE CENTER

POD B(A) INDEPENDENT LIVING BUILDING(A) GARAGE PARKING(A) SKILLED NURSING & MEMORY SUPPORT(A) ASSISTED LIVING BUILDING(B) ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT INST. BLDG (PHASE II)(C) SPA BUILDING (ACCESSORY)(D) ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT BUILDING (PHASE II)(E) ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT BUILDING(F) EXISTING ADULT DAY CARE

BUILDING COVERAGEIMPERVIOUS AREAPERVIOUS AREALAKE SURFACEREC AREA PROVIDED*RESIDENTS OF PODS A & B TO HAVE ACCESS TO REC AREAIN POD D.

PARKING REQUIREMENTS

(G) MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (105 UNITS)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED(1 SP / 4 BEDS VESTED APPROVAL)TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

(H + I) JARC (20 D.U. & 21,290 SF RESOURCE CENTER)TOTAL PARKING EXISTING(VESTED APPROVAL) -NOT AFFECTED BY CCRC REQUEST

(F) ADULT DAYCARE (90 ADULTS)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED(1 SP/EMPLOYEE + 5 TRANSIENT SPACES VESTED APPROVAL)TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY-TYPE 3 (538 BEDS)(A) INDEPENDENT LIVING (464 BEDS + 2,000 SF OFFICE)

TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED(1 SP/2 BEDS + 1 SP/200 SF OFFICE)TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

(A) ASSISTED LIVING (50 BEDS + 2,000 SF OFFICE)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED(1 SP/2 BEDS + 1 SP/200 SF OFFICE)TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

(A) MEMORY SUPPORT (24 BEDS + 1,000 SF OFFICE)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED(1 SP/2 BEDS + 1SP/200 SF OFFICE)TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

NURSING OR CONVALESCENT FACILITY (60 BEDS + 2,000 SF OFFICE)(A) SKILLED NURSING

TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED(1 SP/3 BEDS + 1 SP/200 SF OFFICE)TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

ASSEMBLY, NONPROFIT INSTITUTIONAL (80,000 SF)(D) ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT INST. (25,000 SF)

TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED (1 SP/200 SF )TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

(E) ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT INST. (20,000 SF)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED (1 SP/200 SF )TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

(B) ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT INST. (33,984 SF)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED (1 SP/200 SF )TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED

TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED IN POD BTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED IN POD B

EX. DAYCARE PARKINGADDITIONAL SURFACE PARKINGGARAGE PARKINGCOVERED PARKING

HANDICAP PARKING REQUIREDHANDICAP PARKING PROVIDED

GARAGE H.C. PARKINGSURFACE H.C. PARKING

VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQVAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDEDLOADING REQUIREDLOADING PROVIDEDDROPOFF PARKING

40.14 AC6.04 AC

34.10 AC 1.19 AC30.95 AC0.92 AC1.04 AC

125 D.U.105 D.U.20 D.U.

871,787 SF128,787 SF81,941 SF25,556 SF21,290 SF

744,200 SF397,200 SF90,000 SF87,000 SF62,000 SF33,984 SF6,266 SF

25,000 SF20,000 SF23,000 SF

360,438 SF70% MAX.30% MAX.

1.55 AC.30 AC*

236

107

68

25

94

242

277

35

35

17

17

30

30

125125

100100

17017574485394

5051985622431132557

NTS.

LOCATION MAP

EXISTING JCCCAMPUS

GLADES ROAD

W. PALMETTO PARK ROAD

S.R

.7

(U.S

. 44 1

)

SITE

95TH AVE.

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARDOF ADJUSMENT, AT THEIR MARCH 18, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING,APPROVED THE FOLLOWING VARIANCE(S): TO ALLOW APROPOSED CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY BUILDING TOENCROACH INTO THE REAR SETBACK (SOUTH PROPERTY LINE)AND TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF THE REQUIRED WESTERNLANDSCAPE BUFFER.

AGENDA ITEM

BOFA 9900018

ADDRESS OFPROPERTY

CODE SECTION REQ. PROP. VAR.

40' 35' 5'6.8.B.7CIVIC POD, REAR SETBACKFOR CLF BUILDING

15'0'15'

N/A

THE ABOVE VARIANCE(S) WAS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING ZONING CONDITION(S):1. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL PROVIDE THE BUILDING DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE BOARDOF ADJUSTMENT RESULT LETTER AND A COPY OF THE SITE PLAN PRESENTED TO THE BOARD,SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. (BLDG PERMIT: BLDG)2. BY APRIL 18, 1999 OR DRC CERTIFICATION, WHICH OCCURS FIRST, THE APPLICANT SHALLPREPARE A PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT REFLECTS THE RELOCATION OF REQUIRED TREESAND SHRUBS FROM THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERN LANDSCAPE BUFFER ELSE WHERE ON SITE.(DATE: MONITORING-ZONING-DRC)3. PRIOR TO DRC CERTIFICATION THE BOFA CONDITIONS SHALL BE REFLECTED ON THE CERTIFIEDSITE PLAN. (ZONING-DRC)ENGINEERING COMMENT(S): NO COMMENT (ENG)

VARIANCE APPROVALS

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AT THEIR MAY 21, 1998PUBLIC HEARING, APPROVED THE FOLLOWING VARIANCE(S) WHICH HAVE BEEN REVISED BECAUSE OF ASCRIBENERS ERROR:

TO ALLOW FOR THE ELIMINATION OF A COMPATIBILITY BUFFER.

BOFA 96000367-3f-7.3.ELANDSCAPE REGULATIONS,15' R-O-W BUFFER ALONGTHE WEST SIDE OF95TH AVE.7-3f-7.3.ELANDSCAPE REGULATIONS10' LANDSCAPECOMPATABILITY BUFFER

LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS25' PERIMETER BUFFER

7-3f-7.3.ELANDSCAPE REGULATIONS15' R-O-W BUFFER ALONGTHE EAST SIDE OF95TH AVE.

LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS15' PERIMETER BUFFER

15 FEET

15 FEET

10 FEET

25 FEET

15 FEET

0 FEET

0 FEET

15 FEET(ELIMINATIONOF LANDSCAPEBUFFER)

10 FEET(ELIMINATIONOF LANDSCAPEBUFFER)25 FEET(ELIMINATIONOF LANDSCAPEBUFFER)



ZONING CONDITIONS:1. BY SEPTEMBER 21, 198 THE APPLICANT SHALL ENSURE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONSARE SHOWN ON THE CERTIFIED SITE PLAN AND MASTER PLAN.(DATE: MONITORING/ZONING-DRC)2. BY JULY 21, 1998 THE CERTIFIED SITE PLAN FOR PONTE VERDE PUD, PETITION 97-056, AND THECERTIFIED SITE PLAN FOR RAINBERRY PUD, PETITION 84-139 SHALL BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THEDELETION OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, CONSISTENT WITH THIS VARIANCE APPROVAL. THE SITEPLAN AND MASTER PLAN SHALL CLEARLY DELINEATE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, CONSISTENT WITHTHIS VARIANCE APPROVAL. THE SITE PLAN AND MASTER PLAN SHALL CLEARLY DELINEATE THELANDSCAPE BUFFERS THAT HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED. (DATE: MONITORING/ZONING-DRC)

LEGEND

NOTES

PREP

AR

ED F

OR

TH

E JE

WIS

H F

EDER

AT

ION

OF

PALM

BEA

CH

CO

UN

TY

, FLO

RID

A

RA

INBE

RR

Y P

UD

- P

OD

S A

& B

SOU

TH

PA

LM B

EAC

H C

OU

NT

Y

PRIVATECIVIC

(POD B)

NOTES: - BUILDING COVERAGE INCLUDES ALL BUILDINGS IN POD B, INCLUDING BUILDINGS A-F. - POD B FAR BASED ON NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ONLY

N

AGENDA ITEM CODE SECTION

7.3.ALANDSCAPE REGULATIONS,ELIMINATE COMPATIBILITYLANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH

REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE

0 FEET

0 FEET

0 FEET

LAND DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION VARIANCES (ZR-2010-007)

ARTICLE 11,SECTION E.2.A.2

EACH LOT SHALL ABUT ASTREET OF SUITABLECLASSIFICATION.

CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROVIDED

PREVIOUSLY APPROVEDACCESS ONTO THEINGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENTFOR POD B.

ARTICLE 11,SECTION E.9.E.2

PROHIBITION ONSUBDIVIDED LOT ACCESSDIRECTLY TO A MAJORSTREET.

PREVIOUSLY APPROVEDACCESS ONTO ACOLLECTOR ROADWAYFOR POD B BE MAINTAINED.

196' 40.1' 45' 32'CONCURRENCY APPROVAL

PRIVATE SCHOOL (AKA RESOURCE CENTER) - BLDG ICONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY (INDEPENDENT AND ASSISTED LIVING, MEMORY SUPPORT)NURSING OR CONVALESCENT FACILITY (SKILLED NURSING)DAY CARE (ADULT) - BLDG FAPARTMENT (JARC HOUSING - BLDG H)(MULTIFAMILY - BLDG G)RECREATIONAL COMM. CENTER (PORTION OF ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT INST - BLDG B)GENERAL OFFICE (PORTION OF ASSEMBLY NONPROFIT INST. - BLDGS D & E)

21,290 SF / 65 STUDENTS538 BEDS60 BEDS

23,000 SF / 20 EMPLOYEES / 90 STUDENTS107,497 S.F. / 125 D.U.

33,984 SF45,000 SF

APPL.

SD-138 ACCESS ONEASEMENT

VARIANCE

ACCESS POINTSDIRECTLY TO AMAJOR STREETFROM PETITIONER'SPROPERTY.

TYPE 2 ZONING VARIANCE (ZR-2010-008)

3.E.2.DPROPERTYDEVELOPMENTREGULATIONS

PRIVATE CIVIC PODDAYCARE LOT FRONTAGE100 FEET.

CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROVIDED

PRIVATE CIVIC PODDAYCARE LOTFRONTAGE 0 FEET.

RESO.

SV/ZV-2010-01435

VARIANCE

PRIVATE CIVIC PODDAYCARE LOTFRONTAGE 0 FEET.

1. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL CONSTRUCT A NORTH APPROACH LEFT TURNLANE ON 95TH AVE AT THE PROJECT'S CENTRAL ENTRANCE. THIS CONSTRUCTIONSHALL BE CONCURRENT WITH THE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FORTHE SITE. ANY AND ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BEPAID BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. THESE COSTS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOTLIMITED TO, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND ACQUISITION OF ANY ADDITIONALREQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THEISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO: MONITORING-ENG).2. ALL COVERED PARKING SPACES NOT SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN SHALL, AT AMINIMUM, CONFORM TO ALL ULDC AND FLORIDA BUILDING CODEREQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING LAYOUT, STALL SIZE, DRIVE AISLE WIDTH,CLEARANCE HEIGHTS AND ADA ACCESSIBILITY. THE OWNER SHALL ALSO PROVIDE,AT A MINIMUM, FIVE (5) HANDICAP AND ONE (1) VAN PARKING SPACE IN THENORTHERN PARKING GARAGE, AND EIGHT (8) HANDICAP AND ONE (1) VANPARKING SPACE IN THE SOUTHERN PARKING GARAGE.3. ZAR-2014-350 RAINBERRY POD A AND B CONTROL NO. 1984-139 "PRIOR TOAPRIL 1, 2015, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL CREATE POD A AS A LEGAL LOT OFRECORD IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 11 OF THE UNIFIED LANDDEVELOPMENT CODE. (DATE: MONITORING - ENG)"

DRO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

REQUIRED

PROVIDED

N/A

6.04 AC

65'

370'

75'

567'

35'

40.5'

40%

18.8%

25' 15' 25' 15'RESIDENTIAL

(POD A)

30.5' 7.5' N/A 20'

FAR

.35

.056

N/A

N/A

FLU

LR-3

LR-3

2. THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAS DETERMINED THAT AFFORDABLEHOUSING REQUIREMENT CONTAINED IN PLANNING CONDITIONS 1 AND 2 OF THERESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION NO.: ZV/DOA-2011-02350 CONTROL NO.:1984-00139 APPLICANT: SPBC FEDERATION HOUSING INC HAS BEEN COMPILED WITH:MORTGAGE ORB 9984 PG 76. CAPITAL ADVANCE PROGRAM REGULATORYAGREEMENT ORB 9984 PG86. CAPITAL ADVANCE PROGRAM USE AGREEMENT ORB9984 PG 933. : THE DEVELOPER OF THE RAINBERRY PUD -PODS A & B (PETITION#84-139) INTENDS TO SUBDIVIDE THE PARCEL(S) PURSUANT TOTHE PLATTING EXEMPTION IN ARTICLE 11.A.6.B., IN WHICH CASE, THIS SITE PLANSHALL CONSTITUTE THE APPROVED FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR PURPOSES OFCOMPLIANCE WITH SAID ARTICLE.

00-42-47-19-26-000-002300-42-47-19-26-000-002400-42-47-19-26-003-001000-42-47-19-26-003-0020

AMENDMENTS

10/30/2013 RESUBMITTAL






SIDE SETBACK ZONING VARIANCE (ZR-2013-033)

3.D.1.APROPERTYDEVELOPMENTREGULATIONS

POD A PAVILIONSIDE SETBACK: 15 FEET.

CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROVIDEDAPP.

ZV-2013-01840

VARIANCEPOD A PAVILIONSIDE SETBACK: 7.5 FEET.

POD A PAVILIONSIDE SETBACK: 7.5 FEET.




ADDITIONAL SQ. FT. CHART (ART. 2.D.1.G.2.b.1)

396,000 SF 1,200 SF ADDITION(PATIO ENCLOSURE OFWALDORF UNITS)

BCC STARTING SF* REQUEST NEW SF APPLICATION

397,200 SF ZAR-2015-918

400

Col

umbi

a D

rive,

Sui

te 1

10 W

est P

alm

Bea

ch, F

L 33

409

Phon

e 56

1.47

8.85

01Fa

x N

o. 5

61.4

78.5

012

Cer

t No.

609

1 - L

B N

o. 7

055


*PURSUANT TO R-2010-1173, JULY 22, 2010

ZZR 2013-1522 6/27/2013 SMZAR 2013-2256 1/24/2014 ISZAR 2014-0350 4/15/2014 ISZZR 2015-0732 4/16/2015 AS/EOZAR 2015-0918 7/22/2015 DSG

PROJECT #: 00560-007CONTROL #: 1984-00139APPLICATION #: 2012-1579RESOLUTION #: ZR-2012-12;R-2012-778EXHIBIT #: 197 (1 of 2)SUPERSEDES #: 195 (1 of 2)DATE APPROVED: 8/8/2012PROJECT MANAGER:David G. McGuire

hanane.akif

Text Box

POD B

hanane.akif

Text Box

POD A

juan.ortega

Highlight

juan.ortega

Highlight

juan.ortega

Highlight

juan.ortega

Highlight

Appendix D: ITE Trip Generation Rates

Scanned by CamScanner

..

tsa

Recreational Community Center (495)

Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday

Number of Studies: 3 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 62

Directional Distribution : 50% entering, 50% exiting

Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

33.82 22.88 • 36.71 8.03

Data Plot and Equation Caution • Use Carefully· Small Sllmp/e Size

4,000 ,--------:- - - - - - ------------ - --- ----.

3,000 .. ... ...••.• ; .• ... .. . .. .. ·~· . .. .. .• . · ···~-· ••• • ••.. . •. :, .... .. .... . . : .••. >:< ••. ....

2,000

-....... : ... - , ........

X 1,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . .... . .... ~ ... . ....... . ·:· ... . . . ...... : . . ..... . ..... ~ . .... .... . . .

0:~~-~-~~~-~--~~-~-~.r---~---.T---~----~.--~--_J 60 70 80 90

X • 1 000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual 0eta Points

· -·--· A-.ge Rate

FIHed Curve Equation: Not given R2 = ••••

Trip Gtmeration, 9th Edition • lnsliMe of Transportation Engineers


Recreational Community Center (495)

Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday,

Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.


Directional Distribution: 66'% entering, 34% exiting


2.05 1.08 3.18 1.62

Data Plot and Equation

300 ~--------------------------------~--~--~--~

. '' .. .. <"'

•'

. ' • ,'

, ........ -;.. ..- '

,• .

/ -'

X • X • ,.. •

200 • .•.. . • ; .•••.. . : •••••• + ..... ·:· .. ... . ; ...... :. :;;>< ... ·:· ..... ·:· ...... ~ ..... . ........ ~ ..

. '. ' / .......

. ,•

X • ........ ~, ..

.. ..'' ~ , .. X

. ...... . . 100 · ·· ·· ·:·· .. ·,~~~ ... ":· · ·····: . . •. ... : ..

X ., .. • <

• ; • • 0 •• • ; • •• ••• ·~· •••••• ; ••• ~ ••• : ••••••• ~ • •••• •

o j_~~--~-~~~~-~T-~-7To--~-Te'o--~~go--~',oo~~~, ;~o~--,ro~~-,~~~~,~o 30 ~0 ""

X e 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area

X Actuol Dolo Point• --- --· A-....g.Roto

Fitted Curve Equation: Not given

Trip Generation, 9th Editlon • Institute of Transportatlon Engineers tSt


Recreational community Center (495)

Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday,

Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.


Directional Distribution: 49% entering, 51% exiting


2.74 1.05 • 5.37 2.32


400 ~---:-:------:---:---:--:--:----:----:----=== . X

x :

X

0~7· ~~~__u 10 20 30 • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ' X-1000Sq 90 100 I •

. Feet Gross Fl 110 120 oor Area

130

X Aetu•l 0.11 Points

140

Fitted Curve Equation: Not given ----- • Avenoge Rate

Trip Generation, 9th Edition • Institute of Trans 1Xlr1ation Engineers


1134

Day Care Center (565)

Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Students on a: Weekday

Number of Studies: 12 Average Number of Students: 82

Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting

Trip Generation per Student Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

4.38 2.50 7.06 2.37


goo r---~--~--~--~-------------------------------------

800 .. . . . ; .•••• ; .•. . . ; .• • . .. ; .. . .. • ; •.• . • . ; . . • . • .; .•• . •. ;. .. . . • . • ·· .·· ····.··- - - ·;·•· · · :· X

700 . •••• ; . . .. . ; ... . . , .. .. .. ; ...... .. . . . : . ... .. :- . .. .. :- .... . :- .. .. . :- . . ... : ... .. : .

~ 600 ... . . : . . . .. l •. .. . ~ ··· ···=·· · · · ·:- .... ... · ..... . : w ...... ; .. .. .. ... ..

! ~ "' ~ ~ l I

1-

. . 500 .. .. · : · ···· : ·· · · · ··· .. .. . . . .. .... . . . . . .. .. .... . . .. ..

X • 400 .... ..... ........ .. . .. . . ..... * .. .. . . . . . . .

~ . . . .. . .... .. .... .

300 . •.. • ; ... •. ~ .. .. . \ . . . . · .. • .. .. . . .; ... . . . ,• .. .. . . ; .... . . ·.. . . ,. .. ..

. ,.., .. 200 .. .... . . • < • • ••• • • • . • • •• : • • • •• :

• ' • • I • • • ' • ; • • • • •

;..-" .· . . . . .. . · . . . . . . :- . . ··· ·; · · · -·:--- · · =····· ·" ; x . .

100 ..... ~ .... . : . .... : • .. .. ·:. • . . .. ': ..... -: .. . . . . · . ... . -· .. ... .. · .. . . . . .. . . . . . :· .... . : .... .

0~~~:--~~~U 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

X • Number of Students 120 130 140 150

X Actual Olto Points

160

Flltecl CUtVe

Fitted Curve Equation: T = 4.79(X) . 33.46 ------ Average Rate

R2 = 0.75

Trip Generation, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Eng· rneers



Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Students

On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Number of Studies: 71 Average Number of Students: 67

_________ D_i_;re~c~ti:..:o..:..:n:.:a::....l =D.:.:is::tr:.:.:ib::u::::_ti.on: 53% entering, 47% exiting

Trip Generation per Student Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.80 0.39 1.78 0.92


(/)

'0 c w Q.

~ .. 0 :E .. > .. 0> ~ ~ <(

II ...

150

14Q

130

• . . • • X . ,·, •. . . · ... • \ ... . • . •.• : . ... · .. ,. . ........ • •••. : . . .. · . .. . . • .. .. : . . ·X '· .. . . · . ;.. ·.

' 0 • ' I o o .. ~ ;

. . . . . . .: ... .. : ... . : ...... : .... . ~. - .. . : .... . : .... ~ - .. -~/< _: •••• • • ••• • ••• •• ! • •• ·,· • • • •. • • • • .. • • " ~

, . . 120

• • • . • • . X • • • • ... • • • ~ .. .. . ...... . .. 4 . .... ........ . 4 • • •• ~ ........... . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;,_ ... ' ' .

/ • .,"' .

110 . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ~ .. ...... . ·: .... :· . . ..... .. : .... :· .... :- .. . . . . : ~;,"'~· . . . .. . ....... .

100

90

eo

70

. . . . ' , "'." . . . . • • • • ' •. •• ; ••••••• .• ' •• •• ~ .. • .•• • • . ' • > '- • • •• • , • . • . • •••• •• •••••• • • • ··· · :·· ·· : · ·· -~·- · ·:· · x · ,,:/

. . . , . . . .. ~ .. ..... . . ' .... ' ...... ; . . . . . ... .. ..... . . .. .. ... ... ·' .. . . . . . ·:· ... :· . . . : ... ·:· / . . . .

. . ) ... . : ... . : .. ·l· ... :x .. : ... . ; .. +->~-< ·:·. ~- :- .. <· .. . -: .... :- · ·<· ... ·> .. .

...... .. .. . .. :. X .: . .. . ; . ·x>C . . · · .. · · - ~ · · .. ; · .. · ; · · · .:. · · · ; · · · · : · · · .:. · · ·

60

50

40 . .... ... . .. ...... . ...... .. ... -... .. . ... .

. . . . . · ... .. · .... ·: ... .. ~- ... . · . . .. : .. .. :- .... .. · ... .

20 X • • ' • I ' ' I . . : . ... ~ . . .. ~ ... ·:· . . . · . . . .. . · . .. ·,· ... \ ..... .... . ·.· .. . ' . . . .. · . . . ·.· .. .

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 180

X Actual Data Points

X = Number of Students

--- Fitted Cu...,. - ----· Average Rate

Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.73(X) + 4·67 R2 :0.69

Trip Generation, 9th Ed~ion • Institute of Transportation Engineers 1135



Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a:

Number of Studies: Average Number of Students:

Directional Distribution:

Students Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

72 69 47% entering, 53% exiting

Trip Generation per Student

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.81 0.24 1.72 0.94

Data Pl ot and Equation

190 . X .

180 'o • ~ o o o ~ • o • ·=• • o . ; . o o I ;.,, " ~ o o • ; o' o ~ o o , , ;, o o o:o ,, o ~ o o o ~ o o o! o o o ~ o o o o:o o 0 o:o o • • ;. • o o ~ o o o . . . 170 ~ .•• ~ .... : .. •. : ... -~ ••. ;- .. ; ..• ~ .... ; ..•. ; .... ~ ... ; . •• ~ .. . ~ ... <-.. . : .. - . : . .. • ~ . .. . . . . . . . . 160 ... :. -.: ... -:- .. -:-. .. : ... ~ . 0.: ... ; . .. -:- .. -:-. 0. ~ ... : ... ... . ; .... : . ....... . : .. .. : .. .. . -150

140 .. 11 130 w

-~ 120 .....

. .. :· .. ·: .. --:-. . -~- ... : ... - ~ ... i ... ·> .. . : .... : .... : .. 0 - ~ •• • ~ •• •• : • ••• : •••• : •• • ·i· .. -,.'~( ..

... ' . . . ~- . .. : .. '.: . . .. : . . . : . . . ; .. . ~ - .. . : .. . . : .... : ... : . . .. ... ~ - .. :. . . . _," . . . . . . . . ...... ,., ...... . . . . • •• t ••• ; •• •• : •••• : •••• ~ •• • ; • •• ; •• • • : •••••••• • : •• • • : •••• ; •• • ; ••• ; • • .; .. ":' ~ ... ~- • •• : •••

... ,_: ... '.: . . .. : .. .. _; .. .. ; .. . . ~ . .. ; .... : ..... : ..... : . . . . : .. .)( .:. . . : ,./~ . . . . ; . ....... ~ .. . . : ... . !!l 110 .!.1 .s:;

"' 100 > . .. ·: . .. ·: . .. . :- ... ; . .. . . : .. . ., 90 "' e

"' 80 ~

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........ ...... - . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ............ . . .

I 70 ..... 80

50

40

30

20

10

• • ' • .. ' JS • 'i(- ;;l· . X • • • • , ... ' • .. ' , ' ' • ' '

· ~~- ~: . ~ r' : .. • : r F • • r: •: •: : • • ••• • • : • • : · . 10 20 30 40 60

120 130 140 ISO 160 170 180 190 200

X Actu.l Doll Polnta

70 80 :90 100 110

X • Number of Students

F1110d Cwve •••••• A-.ge RAila

Fitted Curve Equation: ln(T) = 0.88 ln(X) + 0.27

1136 Trip Generation, 9th Edition • Institute ofTransportation Engineers

'

Appendix E: Internal Capture

Name of Dvlpt Rainberry PUDAnalyst WGI Time Period Daily

Date

Private School Land Use B: Recreational Community CenterITE LUC: 536 Balanced ITE LUC: 495

Size: 0 Students 1.0% 0 0 5.0% 29 Size: 33,984 SFEnter from External: Total Internal External Total Internal External Enter from External:

0 Enter 0 0 0 5.0% 0 0 1.0% 6 Enter 575 20 555 555Exit to External: Exit 0 0 0 Balanced Exit 574 20 554 Exit to External:

0 Total 0 0 0 Total 1,149 40 1,109 554% Demand 2.0% 11 % 100% 3% 97%

Balanced 110.0% 0 3.0% 0 2.0% 0 1.0% 0 Demand Demand 3.0% 16 1.0% 6 3.0% 17 1.5% 9 1.0% 6

3.0% 00 0 0 0 Balanced 0 4 2 4 5

Balanced Balanced Balanced Balanced 4.0% 8 3.0% 0 Balanced Balanced Balanced Balanced3.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 5 2.0% 11 Balanced 0 2.0% 4 1.0% 2 1.0% 4 1.5% 5

4.0% 8Demand

2.0% 12CLF 12 Balanced Land Use D: Day Care

ITE LUC: 253 3.0% 16 Demand ITE LUC: 565Size: 538 Dus Size: 90 Students

Enter from External: Total Internal External Balanced Total Internal External Enter from External:524 Enter 544 20 524 1.0% 5 2 1.0% 2 Enter 197 12 185 185

Exit to External: Exit 543 21 522 Exit 197 12 185 Exit to External:522 Total 1,087 41 1,046 1.0% 5 2 1.0% 2 Total 394 24 370 185

% 100% 4% 96% Balanced % 100% 6% 94%Demand 3.0% 6

Balanced 1Demand 1.0% 1

4.0% 22 3.0% 16 Demand 4.0% 8 2.0% 41.0% 5

2 3 Balanced 5 7 4Balanced Balanced 2.0% 7 2.0% 11 Balanced Balanced

3.0% 2 4.0% 3 Balanced 4 2.0% 7 4.0% 141.0% 4

DemandAssisted Living Facility 1.0% 2 Land Use F: General Office

ITE LUC: 254 2 Balanced ITE LUC: 710Size: 60 Beds 3.0% 2 Demand Size: 45,000 SF


Exit to External: Exit 80 9 71 Exit 358 16 342 Exit to External:71 Total 160 16 144 2.0% 2 2 5.0% 18 Total 716 35 681 342

% 100% 10% 90% Balanced % 100% 5% 95%

Balanced Balanced2.0% 12 2 3.0% 2 2.0% 7 0 1.0% 0

3.0% 17 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 4 0 2.0% 0Balanced Balanced

A B C D E F Total

Private School

Recreational Community

CenterCLF Day Care

Assisted Living Facility

General Office

0 555 524 185 73 339 1,6760 554 522 185 71 342 1,6740 1,109 1,046 370 144 681 3,3500 1,149 1,087 394 160 716 3,506

#DIV/0! 3.48% 3.77% 6.09% 10.00% 4.89% 4.45%

Internal Capture = 4.45%

Demand Demand

Multi-Use Trip GenerationTrip Generation and Internal Capture Summary

7/31/2017

Land Use A:

Demand

Demand Demand

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand DemandDemand

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand DemandDemand

Land Use C:

Demand Demand

Demand

Demand

Demand Demand

Demand Demand Demand DemandDemand

DemandDemand Demand Demand

Land Use E:

Demand Demand

Demand Demand

Demand Demand Demand Demand


Single-Use Trip Gen Estimate

NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT

Land UseCategory

EnterExitTotal

2017‐07‐31_Rainberry PUD POD A & B_CPA Traffic Study_2675.00.xlsxIC‐Daily (Equiv) (2)

Name of Dvlpt Rainberry PUDAnalyst WGI Time Period AM

Date




0 Total 0 0 0 Total 70 0 70 24% Demand 2.0% 0 % 100% 0% 100%


3.0% 00 0 0 0 Balanced 0 0 0 0 0


4.0% 1Demand





% 100% 0% 100% Balanced % 100% 1% 99%Demand 3.0% 1


4.0% 1 3.0% 1 Demand 4.0% 1 2.0% 11.0% 0


3.0% 0 4.0% 0 Balanced 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 01.0% 0





% 100% 0% 100% Balanced % 100% 1% 99%



A B C D E F Total

Private School


CenterCLF Day Care


General Office

0 46 19 38 5 88 1960 24 13 33 3 12 850 70 32 71 8 100 2810 70 32 72 8 101 283

#DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% 1.39% 0.00% 0.99% 0.71%


Demand Demand


7/31/2017

Land Use A:

Demand

Demand Demand



Land Use C:

Demand Demand

Demand

Demand

Demand Demand



Land Use E:

Demand Demand

Demand Demand





Land UseCategory

EnterExitTotal

2017‐07‐31_Rainberry PUD POD A & B_CPA Traffic Study_2675.00.xlsxIC‐AM (Equiv) (2)

Name of Dvlpt Rainberry PUDAnalyst WGI Time Period PM

Date




0 Total 0 0 0 Total 93 3 90 46% Demand 2.0% 1 % 100% 3% 97%


3.0% 00 0 0 0 Balanced 0 0 0 1 0


4.0% 2Demand





% 100% 3% 97% Balanced % 100% 1% 99%Demand 3.0% 1


4.0% 2 3.0% 2 Demand 4.0% 2 2.0% 11.0% 0


3.0% 0 4.0% 0 Balanced 1 2.0% 0 4.0% 21.0% 1





% 100% 0% 100% Balanced % 100% 4% 96%



A B C D E F Total

Private School


CenterCLF Day Care


General Office

0 44 48 33 6 11 1420 46 40 39 7 53 1850 90 88 72 13 64 3270 93 91 73 13 67 337

#DIV/0! 3.23% 3.30% 1.37% 0.00% 4.48% 2.97%


Demand Demand


7/31/2017

Land Use A:

Demand

Demand Demand



Land Use C:

Demand Demand

Demand

Demand

Demand Demand



Land Use E:

Demand Demand

Demand Demand





Land UseCategory

EnterExitTotal

2017‐07‐31_Rainberry PUD POD A & B_CPA Traffic Study_2675.00.xlsxIC‐PM (Equiv) (2)

Appendix F: Approved Trip Generation

2014-04-11_Rainberry PUD_Pods A and B_583.8.docx Page 3 of 4

Table 3: Trip Generation – Proposed

Land Use Intensity Daily Traffic AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour


Private School8 65 Students 161 32 21 53 5 6 11

Assisted Living Facility9 134 Beds 356 12 7 19 13 16 29

Congregate Care Facility10 464 Beds 937 17 11 28 43 36 79

Day Care11 90 Students 394 38 34 72 34 39 73

Apartment12 125 DU 875 13 52 65 51 27 78

Recreational Comm. Center13 33,984 SF 1,149 46 24 70 46 47 93

General Office14 45,000 SF 716 89 12 101 11 56 67

Σ 4,588 247 161 408 203 227 430

Internal Capture 6.19% 4.90% 6.05%

Private School 15 2 1 3 0 0 0

Congregate & Assisted Living Facilities 70 1 1 2 3 3 6

Day Care 31 1 2 3 1 1 2

Apartment 64 1 5 6 5 3 8

Recreational Comm. Center 55 3 1 4 3 2 5

General Office 49 2 0 2 1 4 5

Σ 284 10 10 20 13 13 26

Pass-By

Day Care 50.0% 182 19 16 35 17 19 36

General Office 10.0% 67 9 1 10 1 5 6

Σ 249 28 17 45 18 24 42

Net Proposed Traffic 4,055 209 134 343 172 190 362

Net Traffic (33) (2) 0 (2) (1) (2) (3)

The proposed Site Plan Amendment for the Rainberry PUD Pods A and B will not generate additional traffic during the peak hour. Based on Article 12 of the PBC ULDC – Chapter A. Section 3.C.5.b, if there is no increase in the captured Site Specific Development Order Net Peak Hour Trips, the project does not require a Traffic Study. The proposed plan for the project has been evaluated following the PBC TPS - Article 12 of the PBC ULDC. This analysis shows that the proposed development will be in compliance with the PBC TPS - Article 12 of the PBC ULDC.

8 Private School: The number of approved students is broken into: POD A: 65 (JARC - offsite) = 65 Students 9 Assisted Living Facility: The number of Proposed beds is broken into: POD B: 60 Beds (Skilled Nursing) + 50 Beds (Assisted Living) 24 Beds (Memory Support)= 134 Beds 10 Congregate Care Facility: The number of approved/Proposed beds is broken into: POD B: 464 (Independent Living) + = 464 Beds 11 Day Care: The number of approved students is broken into: POD B: 90 (Adult Day Care) = 90 Adults 12 Apartment: The number of approved dwelling units is broken into: POD A: 20 DU (JARC Housing) + 105 DUs= 125 DU 13Per ULDC, the three proposed buildings in Pod B: Federation, JFS and JCC follow under the Non-Profit Institutional Assembly category. JCC will offer services similar to a Community Center. 14 Office: As part of a conservative analysis, 45,000 SF of the proposed Non-Profit Institutional Assembly buildings in Pod B were assumed as office use.

Name of Dvlpt Rainberry PUDAnalyst LDS Time Period Daily

Date




70 Total 161 15 146 Total 1,149 55 1,094 553% 100% 9% 91% Demand 2.0% 11 % 100% 5% 95%


3.0% 20 0 2 1 Balanced 2 4 2 4 5


4.0% 8Demand

2.0% 12CLF & ALF 12 Balanced Land Use D: Day Care

ITE LUC: 253 3.0% 19 Demand ITE LUC: 565Size: 464 Beds Size: 90 Students


Exit to External: Exit 646 34 612 Exit 197 17 180 Exit to External:612 Total 1,293 70 1,223 1.0% 6 2 1.0% 2 Total 394 31 363 180

% 100% 5% 95% Balanced % 100% 8% 92%Demand 3.0% 6


4.0% 26 3.0% 19 Demand 4.0% 8 2.0% 41.0% 6


3.0% 13 4.0% 17 Balanced 4 2.0% 7 4.0% 141.0% 4

DemandApartment 1.0% 2 Land Use F: General Office

ITE LUC: 220 2 Balanced ITE LUC: 710Size: 125 DU 3.0% 13 Demand Size: 45,000 SF



% 100% 7% 93% Balanced % 100% 7% 93%



A B C D E F Total

Private School


CenterCLF & ALF Day Care Apartment General

Office

76 541 611 183 414 329 2,15470 553 612 180 397 338 2,150146 1,094 1,223 363 811 667 4,304161 1,149 1,293 394 875 716 4,588

9.32% 4.79% 5.41% 7.87% 7.31% 6.84% 6.19%




Land UseCategory

EnterExitTotal



Land Use E:

Demand Demand

Demand Demand

Demand

DemandDemand Demand Demand Demand

Demand Demand


Demand DemandDemand

Land Use C:

Demand Demand

Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand


Demand

Demand Demand



4/11/2014

Land Use A:Demand Demand

2010_05_17-Rainberry_PUD_POD B Traffic_Trip Gen-583.8.xlsIC-Daily (Equiv) (2)

Exhibit 3 Page 4 of 6

Name of Dvlpt Rainberry PUDAnalyst LDS Time Period AM

Date




20 Total 53 3 50 Total 70 4 66 23% 100% 6% 94% Demand 2.0% 0 % 100% 6% 94%


3.0% 10 1 0 0 Balanced 1 0 0 0 0


4.0% 1Demand





% 100% 4% 96% Balanced % 100% 4% 96%Demand 3.0% 1


4.0% 1 3.0% 1 Demand 4.0% 1 2.0% 11.0% 0


3.0% 0 4.0% 2 Balanced 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 01.0% 0





% 100% 9% 91% Balanced % 100% 2% 98%



A B C D E F Total

Private School



Office

30 43 28 37 12 87 23720 23 17 32 47 12 15150 66 45 69 59 99 38853 70 47 72 65 101 4085.66% 5.71% 4.26% 4.17% 9.23% 1.98% 4.90%




Land UseCategory

EnterExitTotal



Land Use E:

Demand Demand

Demand Demand

Demand


Demand Demand


Demand DemandDemand

Land Use C:

Demand Demand



Demand

Demand Demand



4/11/2014


2010_05_17-Rainberry_PUD_POD B Traffic_Trip Gen-583.8.xlsIC-AM (Equiv) (2)


Name of Dvlpt Rainberry PUDAnalyst LDS Time Period PM

Date




6 Total 11 0 11 Total 93 5 88 45% 100% 0% 100% Demand 2.0% 1 % 100% 5% 95%


3.0% 00 0 0 0 Balanced 0 0 0 1 0


4.0% 2Demand





% 100% 6% 94% Balanced % 100% 3% 97%Demand 3.0% 1


4.0% 2 3.0% 2 Demand 4.0% 2 2.0% 11.0% 1


3.0% 2 4.0% 1 Balanced 1 2.0% 0 4.0% 21.0% 1





% 100% 10% 90% Balanced % 100% 7% 93%



A B C D E F Total

Private School



Office

5 43 53 33 46 10 1906 45 49 38 24 52 214

11 88 102 71 70 62 40411 93 108 73 78 67 4300.00% 5.38% 5.56% 2.74% 10.26% 7.46% 6.05%




Land UseCategory

EnterExitTotal



Land Use E:

Demand Demand

Demand Demand

Demand


Demand Demand


Demand DemandDemand

Land Use C:

Demand Demand



Demand

Demand Demand



4/11/2014


2010_05_17-Rainberry_PUD_POD B Traffic_Trip Gen-583.8.xlsIC-PM (Equiv) (2)


Appendix G: Approved Trip Distribution and Assignment

11 R

ainberry_PUD

_Traffic_583.4

Source: Rainberry PUD R-2007-0424 Traffic Impact Analysis dated September 12, 2008

N.T.S.

~.--------

8 ii2

LEGEND SL - 101. - AM TRAFAC ~ XX

40 - 6X - PM TRAFAC = (YY) 3L --2L __ 6L - ASSIGNMENT = xn;

RAINBERRY PUD LOS No. 583.4

CUNT MOORE RD

YAMATORD

DAILY

2,877

m 18THST

FIGURE 3: TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT

AM PM

855 370

LAND DESIGN SOUTH

Appendix H: 2040 Volumes

Station Roadway From To Owner

Cost Feasible Lanes

Observed 2005

Counts

Observed 2010

Counts

Observed 2015

Counts2040 SERPM 6.5 Adjusted Volume

2040 SERPM7+ Adjusted Volume

1102 FLORIDA TURNPIKE Indiantown Rd Martin County Line FDOT 4X 33,269 N/A 0 66,900 81,5003438 FOLSOM RD Crestwood Blvd Okeechobee Bl PBC 2 4,989 4,492 4,684 5,900 6,5003402 FOREST HILL BLVD Southern Blvd Wellington Trace WEL 6D 39,091 34,180 35,877 52,100 41,1003430 FOREST HILL BLVD Wellington Trc South Shore Blvd WEL 4D 36,110 28,360 28,571 42,100 31,8003407 FOREST HILL BLVD South Shore Blvd SR 7 WEL 6D 57,143 45,720 47,835 59,400 49,8003423 FOREST HILL BLVD SR-7 Lyons Rd FDOT 6D 45,075 34,174 37,209 51,600 43,4003221 FOREST HILL BLVD Lyons Rd Pinehurst Dr FDOT 6D 45,428 34,503 36,125 51,100 47,0003666 FOREST HILL BLVD Pinehurst Dr Jog Rd FDOT 6D 52,443 40,490 42,563 58,200 53,3003636 FOREST HILL BLVD Jog Rd Sherwood Forest Blvd FDOT 6D 46,699 38,014 37,786 50,900 43,2003667 FOREST HILL BLVD Sherwood Forest Blvd Haverhill Rd FDOT 6D 45,119 39,543 41,136 48,800 49,5003625 FOREST HILL BLVD Haverhill Rd Military Tr FDOT 6D 47,087 40,932 43,254 52,200 49,2003627 FOREST HILL BLVD Military Tr Kirk Rd FDOT 6D 49,154 47,216 41,933 52,800 54,2003629 FOREST HILL BLVD Kirk Rd Congress Ave FDOT 6D 48,676 46,688 42,266 57,900 56,0003219 FOREST HILL BLVD Congress Ave I-95 FDOT 6D 44,735 43,416 43,813 56,900 51,4003317 FOREST HILL BLVD I-95 Parker Ave FDOT 5 27,803 26,498 27,796 30,700 30,6003831 FOREST HILL BLVD Parker Ave Dixie Hwy FDOT 5 22,693 17,470 19,467 23,000 21,4003841 FOREST HILL BLVD Dixie Hwy Olive Ave FDOT 5 6,517 5,100 5,338 7,200 5,7001217 FREDERICK SMALL RD Centrl Blvd Military Tr PBC 4D 7,600 8,223 8,119 13,400 9,4001215 FREDERICK SMALL RD Military Tr Alt A1A PBC 2 9,569 9,622 9,724 15,900 11,6004663 GATEWAY BLVD Hagen Ranch Rd Jog Rd PBC 2 7,102 6,040 6,372 9,400 6,8004659 GATEWAY BLVD Jog Rd Military Tr PBC 4D 18,312 16,243 17,274 24,900 21,3004649 GATEWAY BLVD Military Tr Lawrence Rd PBC 6D 25,969 22,097 23,948 30,200 27,8004625 GATEWAY BLVD Lawrence Rd Congress Ave PBC 6D 33,304 28,728 31,071 43,900 32,7004667 GATEWAY BLVD Congress Ave High Ridge Rd BB 6D 40,166 34,623 36,655 52,800 40,3004213 GATEWAY BLVD High Ridge Rd I-95 BB 6D 41,163 43,387 48,114 64,500 52,1004315 GATEWAY BLVD I-95 Seacrest Blvd BB 6D 26,276 24,970 26,287 33,600 32,5005803 GEORGE BUSH BLVD SR A1A US-1 FDOT 2 7,786 6,955 8,555 8,100 7,5003906 GEORGIA AVE Bunker Rd Forest Hill Blvd WPB 2 6,119 N/A 0 6,200 5003900 GEORGIA AVE Southern Blvd Bunker Rd WPB 2 6,939 N/A 0 7,300 1,5003876 GEORGIA AVE Belvedere Rd Southern Blvd WPB 2 6,827 N/A 0 8,400 3,6003860 GEORGIA AVE Park Pl Belvedere Rd WPB 2 1,150 N/A 0 1,900 2,1003844 GEORGIA AVE Banyan Blvd Lakeview Ave WPB 2 4,474 N/A 0 5,000 1,6006429 GLADES RD Palmetto Park Rd Cain Blvd PBC 4D 7,468 7,000 7,761 9,100 7,9006411 GLADES RD Cain Blvd SR-7 PBC 4D 30,928 28,405 29,424 36,900 30,2006415 GLADES RD SR-7 Lyons Rd FDOT 6D 46,600 39,924 40,196 48,500 41,8006413 GLADES RD Lyons Rd Boca Rio Rd FDOT 6D 50,638 46,740 45,717 58,900 57,1006101 GLADES RD Boca Rio Rd Turnpike Entrance FDOT 6D 60,318 49,860 51,697 68,000 59,9006205 GLADES RD Turnpike Entrance Jog/Powerline Rd FDOT 6D 65,077 57,111 0 75,400 67,7006615 GLADES RD Jog/Powerline Rd St. Andrews Blvd FDOT 6D 56,754 52,005 55,321 61,100 61,1006207 GLADES RD St. Andrews Blvd I-95 FDOT 6D 69,770 68,346 63,102 75,300 90,0006307 GLADES RD I-95 Perimeter Rd FDOT 6D 69,258 73,921 59,051 68,000 80,7006821 GLADES RD Perimeter Rd FAU Entrance(10th Ave NW) FDOT 6D 70,373 61,909 43,674 69,100 69,8006831 GLADES RD FAU Entrance(10th Ave NW) Boca Raton Blvd FDOT 6D 40,979 40,520 43,129 46,200 48,3006833 GLADES RD Boca Raton Blvd Old Dixie Hwy FDOT 6D 31,340 30,826 31,207 33,000 36,6006837 GLADES RD Old Dixie Hwy US-1 (Federal Hwy) FDOT 6D 21,142 18,587 25,998 21,200 19,3003432 GREENVIEW SHORES Wellington Trc South Shore Blvd WEL 4D 21,269 16,060 18,685 30,000 23,0003649 GUN CLUB RD Jog Rd Haverhill Rd PBC 2 6,740 4,227 3,918 6,600 7,2003651 GUN CLUB RD Haverhill Rd Military Tr PBC 5 16,087 11,857 9,719 17,800 16,000

8/17/2016 S:\LRTP\2040 LRTP\Modeling\Cost Feasible Plan\2040 CF Model Volumes S65&S7‐062(Plus).xlsx Page 8 of 22

hanane.akif

Highlight

Station Roadway From To Owner

Cost Feasible Lanes

Observed 2005

Counts

Observed 2010

Counts

Observed 2015

Counts2040 SERPM 6.5 Adjusted Volume

2040 SERPM7+ Adjusted Volume

3437 SOUTHERN BLVD Cypress Head Royal Palm Beach Blvd FDOT 6D 45,352 53,158 55,995 73,800 72,000

3405 SOUTHERN BLVD Royal Palm Beach Blvd Lamstein Ln FDOT 8D 48,779 N/A 0 82,500 83,400

3409 SOUTHERN BLVD Lamstein Ln SR-7 FDOT 8D 51,263 65,897 74,163 86,900 81,700

3415 SOUTHERN BLVD SR 7 Sansbury's Way FDOT 8D 38,854 61,147 68,835 75,700 87,700

3105 SOUTHERN BLVD Sansbury's Way Pike Rd FDOT 8D 43,644 62,010 64,009 88,700 78,600

930749 SOUTHERN BLVD Pike Rd Fla Turnpike Entrance FDOT 8D 45,951 56,749 0 80,800 72,900

3223 SOUTHERN BLVD Fla Turnpike Entrance Jog Rd FDOT 8D 39,180 56,858 65,967 75,800 75,500

3643 SOUTHERN BLVD Jog Rd Haverhill Rd FDOT 8D 32,658 61,432 69,801 39,300 75,600

3635 SOUTHERN BLVD Haverhill Rd Military Tr FDOT 8D 30,884 64,446 77,359 39,600 82,100

3637 SOUTHERN BLVD Military Tr Kirk Rd FDOT 8D 26,961 67,701 68,672 52,600 86,300

3673 SOUTHERN BLVD Kirk Rd Congress Ave FDOT 8D 33,449 58,752 65,258 56,700 73,700

3639 SOUTHERN BLVD Congress Ave SB Congress Ave NB FDOT 8D 53,584 N/A 0 67,300 29,500

3675 SOUTHERN BLVD Congress Ave NB Gem Lake FDOT 8D 53,584 58,349 0 74,600 74,400

3217 SOUTHERN BLVD Gem Lake I-95 FDOT 8D 31,292 51,969 58,703 52,200 68,700

3313 SOUTHERN BLVD I-95 Parker Ave FDOT 8D 30,197 30,776 34,484 38,100 34,600

3823 SOUTHERN BLVD Parker Ave Dixie Hwy FDOT 5 22,160 22,301 25,426 25,900 21,300

3825 SOUTHERN BLVD Dixie Hwy Flagler Dr FDOT 5 13,377 11,595 17,152 17,100 11,100

3827 SOUTHERN BLVD Flagler Dr Ocean Blvd FDOT 2 14,504 12,830 14,411 15,800 10,100

6605 SPANISH RIVER BLVD Military Tr IBM Access BR 4 24,618 22,574 29,285 27,100 26,700

6305 SPANISH RIVER BLVD IBM Access Perimeter Rd BR 4 22,776 23,173 27,823 20,700 25,300

6811 SPANISH RIVER BLVD Perimeter Rd Old Dixie Hwy BR 4D 21,491 19,254 22,555 33,900 24,100

6813 SPANISH RIVER BLVD Old Dixie Hwy Federal Hwy BR 4D 16,980 15,945 18,750 20,700 18,300

6801 SPANISH RIVER BLVD Federal Hwy Ocean Blvd BR 4D 18,419 18,762 19,154 23,000 21,200

7013 SR-15 State Market Rd SR-729 Section 20 Rd FDOT 2 8,040 11,523 9,295 11,600 14,300

7012 SR-15 McClure Rd State Market Rd SR-729 FDOT 2 7,300 6,666 6,395 9,600 7,900

7009 SR-15 W Main St McClure Rd FDOT 2 4,113 3,651 3,501 4,100 4,300

7008 SR-15 W Main St N State Market Rd SR-729 FDOT 2 6,149 3,530 2,983 6,300 4,100

7007 SR-15 SR-729 Muck City Rd SR-700 FDOT 2 6,379 5,289 5,061 7,000 6,200

7005 SR-15 Old Connors Hwy Amons Rd FDOT 2 5,270 4,352 4,559 6,800 5,100

6110 SR-7 Broward County Line SW 18 St FDOT 6D 51,123 51,995 51,985 62,100 62,300

6414 SR-7 SW 18 St Palmetto Park Rd FDOT 6D 53,733 48,959 52,909 60,200 57,100

6400 SR-7 Palmetto Park Rd Glades Rd FDOT 6D 58,692 58,187 57,771 64,500 67,100

6402 SR-7 Glades Rd Yamato Rd FDOT 6D 51,532 44,141 45,141 52,700 55,300

6412 SR-7 Yamato Rd Clint Moore Rd FDOT 6D 37,804 31,986 36,321 58,800 43,600

6102 SR-7 Clint Moore Rd Winner's Cir FDOT 6D 32,366 30,642 28,306 55,900 45,800

5404 SR-7 Winner's Cir W Atlantic Ave FDOT 4D 28,073 23,965 27,414 52,600 43,000

5400 SR-7 W Atlantic Ave Lee Rd FDOT 4D 25,797 21,746 24,509 48,800 37,000

5402 SR-7 Lee Rd Boynton Beach Blvd FDOT 4D 27,483 22,402 23,191 49,600 37,600

5102 SR-7 Boynton Beach Blvd Hypoluxo Rd FDOT 6D 32,692 26,203 27,687 56,600 41,300

4402 SR-7 Hypoluxo Rd Lantana Rd FDOT 6D 31,171 28,880 31,450 57,400 38,800

4400 SR-7 Lantana Rd Lake Worth Rd FDOT 6D 42,465 40,402 41,210 67,900 40,200

4406 SR-7 Lake Worth Rd Stribling Way FDOT 8D N/A 53,939 65,398 60,900 55,800

4102 SR-7 Stribling Way Forest Hill Blvd FDOT 8D 51,821 43,846 49,645 72,900 54,700

3452 SR-7 Forest Hill Blvd Pioneer Rd FDOT 8D 55,024 54,731 58,868 83,700 66,400

3408 SR-7 Pioneer Rd Southern Blvd FDOT 8D 55,628 52,008 56,643 84,100 64,100

3406 SR-7 Southern Blvd Belvedere Rd FDOT 8D 59,099 50,065 51,645 77,600 64,600

3404 SR-7 Belvedere Rd Okeechobee Blvd FDOT 8D 47,176 36,000 38,417 57,400 51,200

3468 SR-7 Okeechobee Blvd Orange Grove Blvd PBC 4 N/A 13,661 17,803 27,600 28,500

8/17/2016 S:\LRTP\2040 LRTP\Modeling\Cost Feasible Plan\2040 CF Model Volumes S65&S7‐062(Plus).xlsx Page 18 of 22

hanane.akif

Highlight

Appendix I: Development Potential Form

FLUA Development Potential Form 1 2016

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FORM - 2016 FUTURE LAND USE ATLAS AMENDMENT APPLICATION

Palm Beach County Planning Division 2300 North Jog Road, WPB, FL 33411, (561) 233-5300

I. Amendment Data

Round 18-B Date July 7, 2017

Application Name Rainberry PUD - Pod B PCN 00-42-47-19-35-012-0000; 00-42-47-19-35-001-0010; 00-42-47-19-35-002-0010; 00-42-47-19-35-002-0020; 00-42-47-19-35-002-0030; 00-42-47-19-35-002-0040; 00-42-47-19-35-002-0050

Applicant Federation CCRC Operations Corp. Overlay N/A

Agent WGI Concurrent? Yes

Location East side of 95th Ave S, approximately .26 miles south of Glades Road

Acres 34.10

Current Proposed

Tier Urban/Suburban Urban/Suburban

Use Congregated Living Facility; Adult daycare; Nursing or Convalescent Facility; Assembly; Nonprofit Institutional

No change (expansion of Type 3 CLF)

Zoning PUD No change

FLU LR-3 MR-5 (Pod B)

Underlying FLU N/A N/A

Conditions N/A N/A

Max Trip Generator Use: Single Family Detached Code: 210 Rate: 10

Use: Single Family Detached Code: 210 Rate: 10

Maximum DU 1 3 du/acre x 34.10 ac. = 102 DU 5 du/acre x 34.10 ac. = 170 DU

Maximum Beds _______ max du x 2.39 = _______ _______ max du x 2.39 = ________

Maximum SF 2, 4 ______ FAR x ______ ac. = _______ ______ FAR x ______ ac. = ________

Max Trip Generation 1,020 1,710

Conditioned DU 3, 4 ______ du/acre x ______ ac. = ______

Conditioned Beds 3, 4 _______ max du x 2.39 = ________

Conditioned SF 3, 4 ______ FAR x ______ ac. = ________

FLUA Development Potential Form 2 2016

Conditioned Trip G. 3, 4

Notes 1. Maximum units per acre see Future Land Use Element Table III.C.1; 2. Maximum FAR see FLUE Table III.C.2 for FAR. If the site's acreage is large enough to be a planned

development, utilize the PDD maximum whether or not a PDD is proposed. 3. For applications with a voluntary condition for a maximum development potential; 4. FLUA Amendments with a concurrent zoning application must calculate maximum development potential at

the typical use & trip generation (eg. General Retail for Commercial future land uses) and in addition, calculate the trip generation for the actual proposed zoning application.

II. Traffic Information

In order to be accepted on the day of intake, the application must include a written letter from the County Engineering Department indicating compliance with Policy 3.5-d of the FLUE of the Comprehensive Plan. The letter must state if the traffic generation for the amendment meets FLUE 3.5-d at the maximum density/intensity for the proposed future land use designation or the square footage/use proposed to be assigned as a voluntary condition of approval. For more information, contact the Traffic Division at 684-4030 or visit http://www.pbcgov.com/pzb/planning/FLU.htm

Current FLU Maximum Conditioned or Concurrent

Max Trip Generation 1,020 1,710 N/A

Trip Increase Max. 690

Trip Inc. Conditioned or Concurrent

N/A

Significantly impacted roadway segments that fail Long Range

N/A None N/A

Significantly impacted roadway segments for Test 2

N/A None N/A

Traffic Consultant Dr. Juan F. Ortega, P.E. - WGI

III. Agent Information

Name Juan F. Ortega

Company Name WGI

Address 2035 Vista Parkway

City, State, Zip West Palm Beach, FL 33411

Phone / Fax Number (561)-537-4504/(561)-478-5012

Email Address [email protected]

b)discover.pbcgov.org/pzb/planning/pdf/amendments/rainberrypodbtraffic.pdfdesignation. the net...

Documents