SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS OF AURORAL ACCELERATION PROCESSES

Akademisk avhandling

som med tillstånd av rektorsämbetet vid Umeå universitet för avläggande av filosofie

doktorsexamen framlägges till offentlig granskning vid Institutet för rymdfysik i Kiruna,

konferensrummet Aniara, fredagen den 16 september 1994, kl. 10.15

av

Lars Eliassonfil kand

The thesis includes an introduction and the following papers:

I Eliasson, L., L.-Å. Holmgren, K. Rönnmark, Pitch Angle and Energy Distributions of

Auroral Electrons Measured by the ESRO 4 Satellite, Planet. Space Sci., 27, 87-97,

1979.

II. Eliasson, L., R. Lundin, and J.S. Murphree, Polar Cap Arcs Observed by the Viking

Satellite, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14,451-454, 1987.

i n . Eliasson, L., and R . Lundin, Acceleration/Heating Processes on Auroral Field Lines as

Observed by the Viking Spacecraft, Proceedings of the 21st ESLAB Symposium, ESA

SP-275, 87-91, 1987.

IV. Lundin, R., and L. Eliasson, Auroral Energization Processes, Ann. Geophysicae, 9, 202-

223, 1991.

V. Eliasson, L., M. André, R. Lundin, R. Pottelette, G. Marklund, and G. Holmgren,

Observations of Electron Conics by the Viking Satellite, submitted to J. Geophys. Res.,

1994.

VI. Eliasson, L., M. André, A. Eriksson, P. Norqvist, O. Norberg, R. Lundin, B. Holback,

H. Koskinen, H. Borg, and M. Boehm, Freja Observations of Heating and Precipitation

of Positive Ions, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Kiruna 1994

SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS OF AURORAL ACCELERATION PROCESSES

Lars Eliasson Swedish Institute of Space Physics

P.O. Box 812, S-981 28 Kiruna, Sweden

Abstract

Measurements with satellite and sounding rocket borne instruments contain important

information on remote and local processes in regions containing matter in the plasma state.

The characteristic features of the particle distributions can be used to explain the morphology

and dynamics of the different plasma populations. Charged particles are lost from a region due

to precipitation into the atmosphere, charge exchange processes, or convection to open

magnetic field lines. The sources of the Earth’s magnetospheric plasma are mainly ionization

and extraction of upper atmosphere constituents, and entry of solar wind plasma. The intensity

and distribution of auroral precipitation is controlled in part by the conditions of the

interplanetary magnetic field causing different levels of auroral activity. Acceleration of

electrons and positive ions along auroral field lines play an important role in magnetospheric

physics. Electric fields that are quasi-steady during particle transit times, as well as fluctuating

fields, are important for our understanding of the behaviour of the plasma in the auroral region.

High-resolution data from the Swedish Viking and the Swedish/German Freja satellites have

increased our knowledge considerably about the interaction processes between different

particle populations and between particles and wave fields. This thesis describes acceleration

processes influencing both ions and electrons and is based on in-situ measurements in the

auroral acceleration/heating region, with special emphasis on; processes at very high latitudes,

the role of fluctuating electric fields in producing so called electron conics, and positive ion

heating transverse to the geomagnetic field lines.

Keywords: Aurora, particle acceleration, space plasma, magnetosphere, ionosphere, polar cap,

satellite observations.

IRF Scientific Report 217 Swedish Institute of Space Physics Kiruna 1994

ISSN 0284-1703 ISBN 91-7174-926-8

pp 31+6 papers

Satellite Observations of Auroral Acceleration Processes

by

Lars EliassonSwedish Institute of Space Physics

P.O. Box 812, S-98128 Kiruna, Sweden

IRF Scientific Report 217 August 1994

Printed in Sweden Swedish Institutè of Space Physics

Kiruna 1994 ISSN 0284-1703

ISBN 91-7174-926-8

Satellite Observations of Auroral Acceleration Processes

Lars Eliasson

Swedish Institute of Space Physics, P.O. Box 812, S-981 28 Kiruna, Sweden

Abstract Measurements with satellite and sounding rocket borne instruments contain important information on remote and local processes in regions containing matter in the plasma state. The characteristic features of the particle distributions can be used to explain the morphology and dynamics of the different plasma populations. Charged particles are lost from a region due to, for example, precipitation into the atmosphere, charge exchange processes, or convection to open magnetic field lines. The sources of the Earth’s magnetospheric plasma are mainly ionization and extraction of upper atmosphere constituents, and entry of solar wind plasma. The intensity and distribution of auroral precipitation is controlled in part by the conditions of the interplanetary magnetic field causing different levels of auroral activity. Acceleration of electrons and positive ions along auroral field lines play an important role in magnetospheric physics. Electric fields that are quasi-steady during particle transit times, as well as fluctuating electric fields, are important for our understanding of the behaviour of the plasma in the auroral region. High-resolution data from the Swedish Viking and the Swedish/German Freja satellites have increased our knowledge considerably about the interaction processes between different particle populations and between particles and wave fields. This thesis describes acceleration processes influencing both ions and electrons and is based on in-situ measurements in the auroral acceleration/heating region, with special emphasis on; processes at very high latitudes, the role of fluctuating electric fields in producing so called electron conics, and positive ion heating transverse to the geomagnetic field lines.

Keywords: Aurora, particle acceleration, space plasma, magnetosphere, ionosphere, polar cap, satellite observations.

2

Contents

Introduction and Summary of Papers

Introduction 3Electron Acceleration 5Hot Plasma Observations in the Polar Cap 8Ion Heating and Precipitation 12Measurement Techniques 14

Viking 14Freja 17

References 24Publications 26Acknowledgements 28Summary of Papers 30

Included Papers

L Eliasson, L., L.-Å. Holmgren, K. Rönnmark, Pitch Angle and Energy Distributions of Auroral Electrons Measured by the ESRO 4 Satellite, Planet. Space Sci., 27, 87-97,1979.

ü. Eliasson, L., R. Lundin, and J. S. Murphree, Polar Cap Arcs Observed by the Viking Satellite, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14,451-454,1987.

HI. Eliasson, L„ and R. Lundin, Acceleration/Heating Processes on Auroral Field Lines as Observed by the Viking Spacecraft, Proceedings of the 21st ESLAB Symposium, ESA SP-275, 87-91,1987.

IV. Lundin, R., and L. Eliasson, Auroral Energization Processes, Ann. Geophysicae, 9,202-223,1991.

V. Eliasson, L., M. André, R. Lundin, R. Pottelette, G. Marklund, and G. Holmgren, Observations of Electron Conics by the Viking Satellite, submitted to J. Geophys. Res., 1994.

VI. Eliasson, L., M. André, A. Eriksson,.P. Norqvist, O.Norberg, R. Lundin, B. Holback, H. Koskinen, H. Borg, and M. Boehm, Freja Observations of Heating and Precipitation of Positive Ions, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

3

IntroductionThe results of particle acceleration and precipitation at high latitudes in the

form of visual phenomena, such as the aurora, has for a long period of time fascinated mankind. The scientific tradition in this field in Scandinavia is long. It was thus very natural that the first Swedish satellite was devoted to studies of the main auroral electron acceleration region. The orbit of Viking made it possible to extensively study particle distributions on magnetic field lines connected to the auroral oval as well as at latitudes equator- and poleward of the statistical oval at altitudes above, in, and below the acceleration region. High resolution measurements were made during the traversal of individual discrete auroral arcs. The Viking observations were found to be much more variable and complex than anticipated.

The importance of electrostatic acceleration, as well as time-varying acceleration/heating mechanisms, are discussed in this report. High resolution particle measurements can be used to determine the temporal behavior and spatial extension of both remote and local acceleration regions. It is essential to have a knowledge about the spatial extent and temporal development of the processes to be studied. This seems to be very obvious but is sometimes neglected. Studies of the coupling between the magnetosphere and the solar wind during low magnetic activity, in the auroral oval, have recently given interesting results on auroral phenomena in the region poleward of the oval, the region normally called the polar cap, and in the dayside oval. Physical mechanisms related to the outflow of ions from the ionosphere have been studied extensively lately and observations have confirmed the ideas that the ionosphere can be a very important source of magnetospheric plasma. Both Viking and Freja have made important contributions to the understanding of ion heating processes.

The auroral energy comes from the Sun through the flow of solar wind plasma. The solar wind - magnetosphere dynamo can generate a power of more than 1012 W. The potential across the magnetosphere amounts to about 50 kV and the current dissipated in the polar ionosphere is of the order of million Amperes. Chapman and Ferraro [1931] proposed that the Earth and its magnetic field are confined, temporarily, in a cavity which is formed during the passage of hot gas (called M-stream) from the Sun. Later, Biermann [e.g., 1957] proposed a continuous flow of plasma from the sun, which means that the magnetosphere is a permanent feature. The term magnetosphere was introduced by Gold [1950]. Piddington [1960] proposed that the magnetosphere has a long cylindrical tail whose presence was confirmed by Ness [1965]. The concept of the convection motion of the magnetospheric plasmas was originally proposed by Axford and Hines [1961]. It is normally assumed that the magnetospheric dynamo has the minimum efficiency, i.e. no energy will be dissipated in the polar ionosphere, when the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) has a large (> 5 gamma) northward component for several hours. This is, however, only partly true as has been shown by measurements in the polar cap [Zanetti et al., 1984],

The auroral oval was defined by Feldstein [1963]. A historical review on the auroral oval can be found in Brekke [1984], Snyder and Akasofu [1974] defined discrete aurora as a single, bright strand, separated from others by a dark space of order of a few tens of km in width. When it is seen from the ground it has a curtain-like structure. There are different characteristics in the electrodynamics of the individual auroral arcs mainly depending on the closure of the current circuit, the magnetospheric source (dynamo) and the action on (of) the ionosphere (load

4

or generator). One component, that plays a crucial role in the formation of auroral structures is the convection of the ambient plasma. The diffuse aurora appears as a broad band of luminosity with a width of at least several tens of km. It may not be easily visible from the ground but can cover a large part of the sky. Sounding rocket results published by Mcllwain [1960] showed that the visible auroral light could be explained by an enhanced influx of electrons in the energy range 5-10 keV.

The oval has been characterized as quiet when the magnetic activity in the nightside is low. It seems, however, that there are different processes that control the dayside compared to the nightside and it is obvious that the activity is increased at high latitudes during “quiet” periods. The dayside auroral region is connected to the low latitude boundary layer (LLBL). This region is characterized by time-dependent magnetosheath plasma injection and strong plasma acceleration. Another interesting region in the dayside magnetosphere is the polar cusp. This is a region more or less directly connected to the solar wind plasma that has penetrated the bow shock.

This report will concentrate on satellite observations of auroral acceleration processes. Data from three satellites will be presented and two of the missions will be described in some more detail. The discussion of the acceleration processes is based mainly on hot plasma observations made with the Swedish Viking and the Swedish/German Freja satellites except Paper 1. The ESRO 4 data presented in Paper 1 have given ideas concerning the formation of electron conics and information about electron acceleration and is therefore included in this thesis. ESRO 4 had an orbit with apogee at 1177 km and perigee at 245 km.

Both Viking and Freja are very well suited for studies of auroral processes, Viking, most of the time, being in or above the acceleration region and Freja below. The possibilities to compare the two data sets offer a good opportunity to learn more about the fascinating auroral processes that people at high latitudes can enjoy. That detailed study of Freja data has only started when this is written.

The schematic on the next page (scale not correct) shows some of the properties that are being studied with the two satellites. The magnetospheric dynamo, powered by the solar wind, generates a current system in the magnetosphere/ionosphere with upward currents on auroral arc field lines, ionospheric Hall and Pedersen currents, and a downward return current close to the arc. Parallel electric field acceleration, transverse and parallel ion heating/acceleration, density depletions, wave generation and damping, and plasma outflow are pronounced effects that are still not fully understood.

It is beyond the scope to here give an extensive reference to previous work dealing with observations of auroral acceleration. Many excellent books and review papers have been published recently. A short introduction to electron acceleration, auroral activities at high latitudes, and ion heating is given in the next sections.

5

Dynamo

Viking2000- 13500 km

Upward election and ion beams Electron and ion conics AKRand broadband electrostatic noise Plasma depletions

Freja600-1750 km

Precipitating electrons and ions Ion heating and evacuation Vkve-particle interaction Quasi-trapped elections

Aurora! Magnetic field line

Earth

The orbits and instrumentation of the Viking and Freja spacecraft have been ideal for extensive studies of auroral phenomena.

Electron Acceleration

Several auroral electron acceleration mechanisms have been suggested in the past years to explain the energization of auroral electrons at altitudes from about one thousand kilometers to 2 Re. Electrostatic shocks or bursts of intense electric field reversals of various scale sizes, fields parallel to the ambient magnetic field lines (e.g., double layers), solitary structures, resonant interaction with wave fields, and other wave emissions may all be important. Viking particle measurements have provided possibilities to study fine scale structures in the distribution function of electrons and ions. Freja, mostly below the acceleration region, observes mainly the effects on the cold ionospheric plasma, but the hot precipitating magnetospheric plasma gives information on processes at higher altitudes.

6

Monoenergetic electron distributions [e.g., Mclhvain, 1960; Albert, 1967; Evans, 1968] and strongly field-aligned fluxes of electrons [Hoffman and Evans, 1968] became the first evidence that parallel electric fields could be established along the magnetic field lines as proposed by Alfvén [1958]. Many signatures of the hot plasma observed by satellites can be explained by the effects of acceleration in quasi-static parallel electric fields. The electric fields can act as a static field for some particles and as a fluctuating field for others.

Several modeling attempts were made during the 1970s [e.g., Knight, 1973; Evans, 1974; Lennartsson, 1976]. One particular problem was early discovered in the data [Albert and Lindström, 1970], namely that electrons were frequently located in a part of phase space that should be a “forbidden region.” The ESRO 4 satellite, which was launched in 1972, did also observe a large amount of electrons in the forbidden region in phase space. Paper 1 of this report demonstrates a way to explain this type of observations. “Local trapping” of particles between the parallel electric field above and the magnetic mirror force below is frequently observed when the acceleration region is above the point of observation.

Other features in the distribution function of electrons, that can not be explained by static electric field acceleration, have been observed more recently when higher resolution measurements have been performed and other regions of space been studied. Low-frequency fluctuations of the electric field have been found to play an important role in the auroral region. They can explain, e.g., the observations of electron conics [André and Elias son, 1992] and situations were electrons and positive ions are accelerated in the same direction [Hultqvist et al., 1988]. Electron conics were first discovered by Menietti and Burch, [1985]. Electron conics are electron distributions observed on auroral field lines with the highest intensities at some angle away from the magnetic field. They are roughly similar to ion conics but generated in a different way. Some electron conics may be caused by a fluctuating electric field parallel to the Earth's magnetic field. An electron accelerated through a certain potential drop when moving downward may after magnetic mirroring find that the potential has changed, and it can escape and gain an energy of maybe a few keV. This can be called a resonant effect, since the electron travel time below the acceleration region and the frequency of the electric field oscillations have to match. Some electron conics might also be caused by wave energization mainly in the parallel direction or in the perpendicular direction (e.g., by upper hybrid waves).

André and Eliasson [1994] made simulations including a dipole magnetic field with a field strength varying as r 3, and an absorbing atmosphere at a geocentric distance (r) of 6500 km. A time-varying electric field was assumed to be located between 14500 km and 16500 km. The electric field was composed by a static part and a fluctuating part. The static field was chosen as 1 mV/m which corresponds to a total potential drop of 2 kV. Several different properties of the time-varying electric field were tested. Fluctuations at a specific frequency as well as broadband fluctuations were seen to give distributions similar to the observed within certain limits (frequencies between 0.3 and 6 Hz, and a larger static than fluctuating electric field amplitude) for the chosen altitude range and particle characteristics. 50000 particles were randomly selected from a Maxwellian distribution with a temperature of 100 eV, the temperature of the downgoing population observed by Viking. The particle start times were spread over one wave period and the particles were followed in small time steps until they were either lost or they returned to the spacecraft. Similar electron conics can be

7

generated with the same static field without the time-varying part but including a parallel diffusion coefficent equal to 1.5 x 1014 m2/s3. Perpendicular heating was also tested using a static field of 1 mV/m and a perpendicular wave diffusion coefficient equal to 1.5 x 1014 m2/s3 at geocentric distances between 7500 and 8500 km. This again gave electron conics in reasonable agreement with observations. Lysak [1993] discusses the properties of Alfvén waves in a region called the ionospheric Alfvén resonator. He shows that they have characteristics that can explain the formation of electron conics in a way that can be described as acceleration in a fluctuating parallel electric field, similar to the favored theory in André and Eliasson [1992, 1994]. André and Eliasson [1992, 1994] assumed the existence of the parallel electric field and did not discuss if, where, and when it should appear.

The effects of acceleration below the satellite altitude can be seen both in the ion data, upward beams, and in the electron data, widened and energy dependent loss cone. Chiu and Schultz [1978] showed the effects of acceleration on magnetospheric particles by plotting the distributions in velocity space. A comparison, using Viking data, of the width of the electron loss cone with the energy at maximum intensity of the ion beam shows a remarkably good agreement, indicating that both electrons and positive ions are accelerated by the same mechanism at relatively low altitudes. The figure below shows some data that also were used by Block and Fälthammar [1990], who compared these estimates with other ways to determine the parallel electric field. Reiff et al. [1988] used Dynamics Explorer data for similar comparisons of signatures in the electron and ion data.

101

»

8

Hot Plasma Observations in the Polar Cap

There are a number of different ways to define the polar cap. These are based on optical signatures, particle characteristics, or the magnetic field topology. The auroral zone constitutes the statistical distribution of the maximum occurrence of aurora while the auroral oval is the instantaneous distribution of aurora at any specific time. The polar cap has earlier been defined as the area poleward of the auroral zone but this was changed to be the area poleward of the auroral oval [Akasofu, 1968]. This does not mean that the polar cap is completely void of auroras. Discrete sun-aligned auroral features are frequently observed at polar cap stations. Enhanced particle fluxes at high latitudes are observed, especially during magnetically quiet conditions, that is, during northward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. The polar cap is often completely void of visible auroras during intense substorms, but often associated with weak uniform precipitation of low- energy electrons, so called polar rain {Heikkila, 1972] during periods of southward IMF.

Another definition of the polar cap is based on the hypothesis that some geomagnetic field lines are connected to the interplanetary magnetic field. The field lines having two footpoints at the Earth's surface are called closed and those with only one, open. The regions with open field lines can be identified as the polar caps. Regions at high latitudes with very low particle densities, thè lobes, exist also in a totally closed magnetic field topology. These regions, with field lines stretched to very far distances in the tail, might be considered the polar cap as well. It is often very difficult to judge whether a magnetic field line is closed or open from measurements. Observations of the particle angular characteristics can be used, but in the polar cap the intensities are low and often close to or below the threshold of the instruments. The results will also depend on which type of particle and particle energy that is used as a tracer. High energy (>30 keV) electrons have been used to determine if the field lines are open or closed [Frank et al., 1986]. The similarity between spectra in the solar wind and the polar cap was used by Fennell et al., [1975] as an indication of free access of solar wind plasma to the polar cap region. The poleward limit of 1 keV electron precipitation [Winningham et al., 1975] and differences in the ion precipitation [Troshichev and Nishida, 1991] represent other possibilities to define the polar cap boundary. Low energy (MeV) cosmic ray particles bombard the region bounded by approximately the auroral oval [Stone, 1964] and is yet another way to determine this area.

The polar cap definition can also be based on the magnetospheric convection. There is typically a region of antisunward convection at high latitudes. This is true for the two-cell convection pattern theory [Axford and Hines, 1961] resulting from a dawn to dusk electric field. Regions of sunward convection are located equatorward of the polar cap according to this picture. Current systems are persistent features in the magnetosphere. The poleward boundary of the region 1 current system can be used as a definition of the polar cap boundary [e.g., Coley, 1983; Mishin et al., 1992],

Some of the above mentioned methods to determine the polar cap area will not give the same answer, but they can all often be used to give a crude estimate of the size of the region more or less void of aurora at high latitudes. During northward IMF the size of the polar cap decreases, which means that closed magnetic field lines will exist at higher latitudes.

The relation of the magnetospheric particles to optical phenomena in the upper atmosphere, as well as knowledge about their connection to different regions in

9

the outer magnetosphere, is essential for the understanding of the acceleration and transport processes. Detailed hot plasma measurements give also clues to find the sources of the particles.

Several attempts have been made to classify the auroral activity at high latitudes. Lassen [1968] describes two main groups of polar cap emissions; discrete polar cap auroras, and polar-glow aurora. Discrete polar cap arcs are typically faint diffuse bands, draperies, or long quiet rays, where each ray may be short-lived, but the total display is often present for several hours. The altitude distribution showed that monoenergetic electrons with energies between 0.5 and 1.0 keV produced the aurora [Starkov, 1968]. The polar glow aurora, generally subvisible, is associated with polar cap absorption, PCA, events and believed to be generated by high energy protons and alpha particles at heights below 100 km.

Winningham and Heikkila [1974] described, besides polar rain, also “polar showers” with structured precipitation of electrons with energies near 1 keV, and a more intense and dramatic type of electron precipitation called “polar squall.” Ismail and Meng [1982] classified, based on DMSP pictures, auroral arcs in the polar cap into 3 categories: distinct sun-aligned arcs, morning/evening arcs expanded from the oval, and hook-shaped arcs.

Sun-aligned arcs that connect both to the dayside and the nightside oval were first observed by Frank et al. [1982] and described in more detail by Frank et al. [1986]. The “theta aurora” was found to be associated with regions of, e.g., sunward convection in the polar cap, field-aligned electron acceleration on closed magnetic field lines, and keV ions. The Dynamics Explorer observations of the theta aurora started an interesting discussion on the topology of the magnetosphere during these events. Observations by the DMSP and the ISIS spacecraft have led to the conclusion that the polar cap arcs are not in the polar cap but at an expanded poleward edge of the auroral oval [Meng, 1981; Murphree et al., 1982]. Recent Viking results [e.g., Lundin et al., 1991] also confirm this hypothesis. Structured fluxes of low energy electrons are often observed between the polar cap arc and the diffuse auroral oval, in many cases together with a 1 - 10 keV plasma sheet like ion population, either in the morning half of the polar cap or in the evening half. The particle characteristics together with information from the imager experiment were used to determine if the polar cap arcs are located at the poleward edge of the auroral oval or if the polar cap is divided by arcs into two or more regions [Austin et al., 1993]. Their conclusion was that the high latitude arcs are better described as the poleward edge of an expanded oval. The UV images obtained by the University of Calgary instrument on Viking were essential to understand the particle observations. It is very important to have a knowledge about the spatial extent and temporal development of processes to be studied.

Accelerated electrons of plasma sheet origin were found by Gorney et al. [1986] at the edges of transpolar arcs. In the central region there was less or no evidence for acceleration. Our observations frequently also show signs of acceleration in the center of polar cap arcs, but often that it occurs at higher altitudes at the edges of the structures. This is seen as increased electron energies, intensities, and often also downward field aligned angular distributions. Parallel electric field acceleration is seen to occur below the satellite as concluded from the observation of upward ion beams and widened electron loss cones. The ion beams studied with Viking on high geomagnetic latitudes were often dominated by H+. There is normally a region with downward field aligned currents close to the arc where the electrons often appear as upward directed collimated fluxes and the ions as

10

conical shaped distributions. Possible particle sources are the solar wind, the plasma sheet (boundary layer), and the upper atmosphere.

Polar cap crossings over auroral structures at high latitudes have shown that acceleration processes below 2 Re are capable of accelerating electrons to energies of 0.5 - 3 keV. Trapped “conical” electron distributions and the presence of an isotropic population of 1 - 10 keV ions indicate, that the arcs occur on closed magnetic field lines, most likely in the plasma sheet boundary layer. The polar cap structures have dimensions similar to discrete auroral arcs, which means that a satellite crossing is rather rapid and the complete distribution function of electrons and ions difficult to measure. Peterson and Shelley [1984] also concluded that polar arcs seem to be connected to regions with similar particle distributions as in the distant plasma sheet boundary layer based on ion composition measurements on polar cap field lines. Hoffman et al. [1985] suggested that the plasma sheet boundary layer was the source of sun-aligned arcs. They reported no indication of an electrostatic field-aligned acceleration. However, the Viking observations clearly demonstrate that downward acceleration of the electrons seems to take place at altitudes below 2 Re. Obara et al. [1988] made simultaneous observations of sun-aligned polar cap arcs in both hemispheres using Viking and EXOS-C measurements. They concluded, that the arcs occurred on closed magnetic field lines, and that they were conjugate.

The ESP5 instrument on board Viking was designed to measure with high angular resolution and to give complementary information on short-lived (small- scale) phenomena. It was mounted on the opposite side of the spacecraft with respect to the spectrometer normally used, ESPI. The advantage of this arrangement is cleary demonstrated at the edges of the auroral structure shown below where a field aligned flux of electrons can be seen in only one of the detectors (at ~ 09.56.30 UT).

3

2

2

0UT 9.48 9.55 10.02ILAT 83.7 88.0 86.5ALT 9400 8500 7600

Data from ESP5 (top panel) at energies around 5 keV and ESPI (two lower panels) at energies o f 400 eV and 220 eV, respectively, obtained during a traversal of an auroral arc at high latitude. Viking spent several minutes moving along the structure. It is not clear that the satellite actually crosses the arc.

VIKING Orbit 1169

S. OOKE V' 1

JB 1 I 1 I I I T M I I I I r i i I I 1 I iMabJllfclmMllill1 I II I l i

M /W W ^EV I

ri l̂L.JLiTJKiL-

. 2 2 0 KEV

11

There is a region with very collimated electron fluxes in the downward current region (09.58.30-09.59.30 UT), that gives a good example of the need for high angular resolution measurements.

VIKING Orbit 1169 9.58.56 UT

300X3

12

peaks close to the hydrogen cyclotron frequency, in this case about 70 Hz. These wave emissions are observed in the region of upward ion beams and indicate that we are close to the generation region.

Positive Ion Heating and PrecipitationThe Earth’s upper atmosphere is an important source of magnetospheric

positive ions [see, e.g., Chappell et al., 1987]. Energy transfer to atmospheric particles takes place in the auroral region resulting in ionization, heating, acceleration, and finally erosion of plasma. An important feature of the energization region is that ions may become accelerated transverse as well as parallel to the geomagnetic field. Ions heated perpendicular to the magnetic field will appear as ion conics at higher altitudes due to the geomagnetic mirror force. Such acceleration has been detected at virtually all altitudes above 400 km on auroral field lines [e.g., Klumpar, 1986 and Chang et al., 1988]. No consensus has been developed as to the fundamental mechanism for their acceleration. Many different acceleration mechanisms are in principle possible. These mechanisms include electrostatic shocks and electric field fluctuations well below the ion gyro frequencies, broadband waves around the ion gyro frequencies, and waves above the lower hybrid frequency. Recent sounding rocket measurements have shown that transverse ion heating can occur in small-scale regions with large amplitude bursts of monochromatic waves. These waves, above the lower hybrid frequency, can occur in thin filamentary density cavities oriented along the geomagnetic field lines [e.g., Vago et al., 1992].

The intensities at small pitch angles for ion beams sometimes show an appreciable spread in energy, indicating the importance of transverse energization. In fact the data sometimes show that the perpendicular heating is much higher than the parallel. Ion conic energies reaching the upper threshold of the Viking instrument (40 keV) have been observed.

Measurements with the Viking satellite established a relation between low- frequency, broadband electrostatic noise (LEF) and ion energization [e.g., Lundin et al., 1990]. Similar events have been found in the Freja data and will be investigated in more detail. Transverse ion energization is often occurring in large-scale plasma density depletion regions.

Energy dispersion signatures and anti-correlation between electron and ion precipitation are pronounced effects in the Freja particle data. Another pronounced feature in the F3H data is banded precipitation of positive ions. Ion “bands” in the central plasma sheet associated with electron inverted-Vs at higher latitudes have been described, e.g., using data from Dynamics Explorer [Winningham et al., 1984], The source is most likely extended in longitude and the ions appear at rather low latitude so the Freja orbit is excellent for the study of this phenomenon. A wealth of examples have been collected and a detailed investigation has started.

The Freja hot plasma data set looks very promising and interesting and it will provide more detailed information on processes such as; heating of ions perpendicular to the magnetic field lines, the source regions of magnetospheric plasma, ion and electron precipitation, energy and mass dispersion features, plasma injection in the dayside magnetosphere during magnetic disturbances, dynamics of the low energy ring current population during magnetic storms and relation of the hot plasma to the other parameters measured on board Freja or with ground based instrumentation. We have thus reasons to believe that Freja will be a

13

continued success and contribute actively to an increased understanding of phenomena in the lower part of the main acceleration region for auroral electrons.

FREJA F3H Orbit: 1547 Date: 93-01-31 Esrange

h Olili3.1

2.5

I'' » ly f . V ÿ W Ä

3.1

2.5

\ A A A A A A / V W \ M A A A A A A ^

^ A A A A Ä Ä Ä Ä A M W vW V ^20.2« 09.20.40

07.5 07.770.3 69.8

-43.6 -41.71766 1764

21.00 09.21.2007.8 07.969.3 68.7

-38.01762 1761

.21.40

-36.3H (k.)

Mem*

Summary plot showing Freja hot plasma data. The three upper panels show energy-time spectrograms for oxygen, helium and hydrogen ions. The fourth panel gives the pitch angle of the ion observations. Panel five and six show electron data and the corresponding pitch angle. The data show perpendicular, mainly oxygen, ion heating when Freja enters the auroral oval from the poleward side at 09.20.30 UT and banded proton precipitation after 09.21 UT. The MATE data indicate anisotropic and variable electron distributions.

14

Measurement Techniques

The magnetosphere, and especially the auroral zone, can be tremendously rich in particle and wave-particle interaction phenomena. Some have been described above. The possibilities to do high resolution measurements have improved during the era of in situ observations in space. One big challenge has been to measure the complete particle distribution functions with high enough resolution to resolve existing anisotropies. A large energy range must be covered and a high resolution sampling of all components of the velocity vector is needed. It is obvious, at least from ion observations, that full three-dimensional measurements with high temporal and spatial resolution are essential. The manufacturing of space instruments includes also other challenges, such as, minimal weight, size, power consumption, and cost, but still enough radiation shielding and data output.

Particle distributions contain many characteristic features with information on remote and local processes that need to be taken into account by theories on auroral processes. The width of auroral structures inferred from in situ measurements can be completely misinterpreted without knowledge about the angle of traversal. It is statistically true that the aurora is elongated in the east-west direction but segments of arcs can have any direction, which, of course, will influence the conclusions. We have with Viking moved more or less parallel to some auroral arcs at high latitudes. This gave us good oppurtunities to make detailed studies of the characteristic features of these arcs. The particle distributions are often far from isotropic Maxwellians. Sharp gradients are often observed. There is a possibility that we sometimes misinterpret data due to the fact that Viking crosses narrow regions too fast, even though we are doing measurements with high resolution. It is also obvious that a complete pitch angle coverage is needed because peaks and minima can occur at all pitch angles. A good pitch angle resolution is also needed, because the intensities can vary by several order of magnitudes within a couple of degrees close to the magnetic field direction. This makes estimates of currents and energy flux in the loss cone doubtful in many cases during traversals of auroral forms.

A short description of the very successful Viking and Freja projects and the hot plasma experiments on board these spacecraft is given below.

Viking

The orbit and instrumentation of the Swedish satellite Viking was well suited for studies of phenomena in the high latitude region. Observations were primarilly done in the acceleration regions at altitudes of 1 - 2 Re. Some of the orbit parameters of Viking are given below.

Apogee altitude 13530 kmPerigee altitude 817 kmInclination 98.8°Orbital period 262 minutesSpin period 20 seconds in cartwheel modeLaunch date 22 February 1986

15

The piggyback launch with the Spot spacecraft made Viking an extremely good satellite for studies of dayside and high latitude phenomena, for example, in die polar cusp and cleft region, and in the region traditionally called the polar cap, although the prime objective was to study nightside auroral phenomena. The following experiments are included in the Viking scientific payload:

VI Electric Field Experiment L. Block, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

V2 Magnetic Field Experiment T. Potemra, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, USA

V3 Particle Experiment R. Lundin, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden

V4L Low-Frequency Wave Experiment

G. Gustafsson, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala Division, Sweden

V4H High-Frequency Wave Experiment

A. Bahnsen, Danish Space Research Institute, Lyngby, Denmark

V5 Auroral UV-Imaging Experiment

C. Anger /J.S. Murphree, University of Calgary, Canada

The Viking particle experiment, V3, included seven sensor units and two data processing units. Six of the sensor units were built, tested, and calibrated at the Swedish Institute of Space Physics in Kiruna.

Two units measured electrons. V3-1 contains three electron spectrometers, ESPI-3, that use a toroidal electrostatic analyzer as energy filter. The energy range 10 eV-40 keV was sampled in 32, 64, or 128 energy steps in 0.15, 0.3, or 0.6 s, respectively. The viewing direction of ESP1-3 are 90°, 70°, and 110° relative to the satellite spin axis. The viewing directions were chosen so that the magnetic field line direction was covered during most of the time when Viking was in the auroral region. A schematic of theV3-l measurement principle is shown below.V3-2 contains two spectrometers, ESP4-5 that use a magnetic deflection system covering the energy range 0.1-200 keV in sixteen energy bands (eight in each spectrometer, ESP4 covering the lower energies) with a relative bandwidth of 0.5-1.0 and an angular resolution of about 2 x 2°. All energy levels were sampled every 70 ms. The electrons are detected by a rectangular microchannel plate. This type of detector provides simultaneous measurements of several electron energies with very high angular resolution (2°) but with less good energy resolution. The ESP 1 detector measured with higher energy resolution but with not as high temporal and angular resolution.

16

Schematic o f the V3-1 instrument [Sandahl et al,. 1985]

Positive ions were measured with 4 units, two with mass separation and two without. V3-3 contains two positive ion spectrometers that cover the energy ranges 40 eV-1.2 keV (PISP2) and 1.2-40 keV (PISP1), respectively. V3-4 is a sectorized (8 sectors) positive ion spectrometer, SECPISP, that uses two toroidal electrostatic analyzers with a total deflection of 180°. SECPISP is equipped with two separate high voltage supplies for the energy ranges, 0.5-450 eV and 10 eV- 12 keV, respectively. The ion composition spectrometers contain toroidal electrostatic analyzers and straight Wien velocity filters (crossed field analyzers). V3-5 includes two spectrometers, ICS1-2 that cover the energy ranges 0.05-0.8 keV and 1.2-20 keV, respectively. V3-6 (ICS3) uses the same measurement technique as ICS 1-2 but covers the energy range 0.001-70 keV.

V3-7 is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer for composition measurements of positive ions in the energy range 10 keV- 10 MeV. The V3-7 instrument was not manufactured in Kiruna.

Analysis programs were developed with various topics in mind. We attempted to cover many aspects of the analysis in order to facilitate joint studies with other Viking experimenters. Data summary files, DSF, were processed at Esrange. The V3 experiment provided 16 point electron energy spectra, 16 point ion energy spectra, and electron energy flux/number flux. The quick-look plots, QLP, utilized data from the DSFs and are used for qualitative analysis. The V3 quick-look data included: ion and electron energy-time spectrogram plots for: 0-30°, 75°-105°, and 150°-180° pitch angle, electron/ion fluxes and mean energies versus time.

Data for scientific analysis are processed from the raw data tapes. Color-coded energy-time spectrogram plots in a microfiche type format were distributed to coinvestigators. Other analysis programs produced time series of countrates/fluxes,

sisa0002Maskinskriven text

sisa0002Maskinskriven textBild borttagen – se tryckt versionImage removed – see printed version

17

spectral plots of ions and electrons (flux, density etc.), pitch angle distributions of electrons and ions, contour plots in velocity space or in energy/pitch angle, computed moments of the distribution function, 3-D ion flow parameters, and ion composition data. A large number of scientists from many countries have been involved in the analysis of Viking hot plasma data.

Schematic o f the V3-2 instrument [Sandahl et al., 1985].

Freja

The Freja spacecraft was launched on October 6, 1992 at 6.20 UT, from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center located at the Gobi desert in north-western China with a Long March 2C vehicle. The orbit, with a perigee at 600 km, apogee at 1755 km and 63° inclination, is highly suitable for studies of a number of phenomena in the auroral region. The inclination gives an orbit where the apogee can be considered as fixed at the same latitude. This has some advantages when comparing data from different local times and disturbance levels, A close to parallel traversal of a part of the oval gives longer observation times and new perspectives of some auroral structures than is obtained with higher inclination orbits. Freja will not reach the polar cap during all orbits. There are four charged particle instruments on board Freja: MATE, TESP, TICS, and CPA. The electron spectrometer MATE and the ion composition spectrometer TICS are included in the F3H experiment, the cold plasma analyzer CPA in F3C, and the electron spectrometer TESP in F7. The table below summarizes the experiments on board Freja.

sisa0002Maskinskriven text

sisa0002Maskinskriven textBild borttagen – se tryckt versionImage removed – see printed version

18

FI Electric Field Experiment G. Marklund, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

F2 Magnetic Field Experiment L. Zanetti, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, USA

F3C Cold Plasma Analyzer B. Whalen, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada

F3H Hot Plasma Experiment L. Eliasson, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden

F4 Wave Experiment B. Holback, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala Division, Sweden

F5 Ultraviolet Imager J.S. Murphree, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Canada

F6 Electron Beam Experiment G. Paschmann, Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany

F7 Correlator Experiment M. Boehm, Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany

The Hot Plasma Experiment, F3H, on board Freja is designed to measure auroral particle distribution functions with very high temporal and spatial resolution. The experiment consists of three different units; an electron spectrometer designed to measure angular and energy distributions simultaneously, a two- dimensional positive ion spectrometer using the spacecraft spin for three- dimensional measurements, and a data processing unit. The main scientific objective is to study positive ion heating perpendicular to the magnetic field lines in the auroral region. Electron distributions in the energy range 0.1-100 keV and positive ion distributions (with mass identification) in the energy range 0.5 eV - 5 keV (can be extended to 15 keV) are measured. A two Mbyte on-board memory is used for intermediate data storage. Most of the hardware was designed and manufactured at the Swedish Institute of Space Physics in Kiruna. The Finnish Meteorological Institute in Helsinki has contributed to the DPU hardware. The design of the spectrometers was checked with computer simulations of particle trajectories in electric and magnetic fields and the instruments were tested and calibrated at the Swedish Institute of Space Physics in Kiruna. A variety of tests to verify the function of different parts of the instrument and the thermal properties were performed as well as, e.g., calibrations with electron and ion sources, and micro channel plate response functions.

19

The Freja Hot Plasma Experiment (F3H) consists of three units: an ion composition spectrometer (TICS), an electron spectrometer (MATE), and a data processing and experiment control unit (DPU).

The main objective with the magnetic imaging two-dimensional electron spectrometer, MATE, is to measure the angular and energy distributions of electrons with high temporal and spatial resolution. Previous missions have shown that it is necessary to measure the electron distributions with high resolution, not only in time and space, but also in energy and pitch angle. This is extremely difficult with the measurement techniques presently available. A combination, MATE and TESP, of different techniques is used on Freja. The TESP spectrometer complements MATE by measuring the energy spectrum with higher resolution. MATE uses a 360° field of view sector magnet (permanent magnetic field with a strength of 0.035 T) energy analyzer with 90° deflection angle for simultaneous energy and pitch angle measurements. Only = 140° field of view is, however, used on Freja. This gives almost full pitch angle and energy coverage due to a high sampling rate if the spin axis is oriented in a favorable direction with respect to die local magnetic field. A schematic of the instrument is shown below.

Schematic o f the MATE instrument showing the entrance apertures, magnets, collimators and MCP package.

20

The sampling period of the full energy range is 10 ms, corresponding to a spatial resolution of less than 100 m. A collimator system enables measurements of the energy spectrum at 16 different energies with a reasonably high resolution, ÀE/E ~ 30 %. Grids are used to prevent the cold plasma from entering into the instrument. The spectrometer unit contains high voltage supplies for the microchannel plate (MCP) assembly, detector logics, and registers for the energy- angle matrix. MATE produces more data than can be transmitted by the telemetry system in real time so the data output must normally be reduced. A summary of the MATE characteristics is given below.

Energy range O.lkeV-lOOkeVAngular sectors 30Energy levels 16Field of view/sensor head 2° X 10°Energy resolution = 30 FWHMMinimum sampling time 10 ms/energy-angle matrixMaximum data rate 400 kbits/s (no data compression)Normal data rate = 20 kbits/sMass 2.84 kgPower 3.7 WConversion factor/sector IO-7 (cm2 sr keV/keV)

The three-dimensional ion composition spectrometer, TICS, measures the “hot” magnetospheric and “cold” ionospheric ion distributions. The heating/acceleration of ions perpendicular to the magnetic field lines is one of the main scientific objectives. Measurements close to 90° pitch angle are therefore very important. We have decided to primarily concentrate on lower energies, that is below 5 keV. The major ion species are covered by the instrument. Data reduction must be used to adjust to the allocated data rate. TICS measures perpendicular to the spin plane thus giving 3-D measurements every 3 seconds. The Freja spin period is close to 6 seconds.

TICS consists of a spherical “top hat” electrostatic analyzer with 360° field of view followed by a cylindrical sector magnet momentum analyzer. The outer plate of the electrostatic analyzer can be swept from 0 to -10 V for measurements of low energy ions (0-60 eV) and the inner plate from 0 V to about 1.5 kV, which covers the energy range 60 eV to 5 keV. This was changed after a couple of months of operation. Now only the inner plate is swept covering energies from 0.5 eV to 5 keV. The dwell time on each energy level is 10 ms and 16 or 32 energy steps are transmitted to ground. This means that one sweep of 16 energy levels takes 160 ms plus an extra time interval of 40 ms that is used for adjusting high voltages and data handling. The radius of the spherical analyzer is 45 mm and the distance between the plates 3.5 mm.

21

Electrostaticanalyser

Magnets

MCPs Sectorized anode

Schematic of the TICS spectrometer. The different ion masses hit the MCP at different radial distances.

A summary of the TICS characteristics is given below.

Energy range 0.5 - 5000 eV/qMass range 1 -4 0 Amu/qAngular sectors 30Energy levels 32 (or 16)Energy resolution 10 % FWHMField of view/sensor head 5x10°Geometric factor 5 X 10'6 (cm sr keV/keV) per 11° openingTime resolution 0.5 spin period (=3 s)Maximum data rate 800 kbits/s (no data compression)Normal data rate = 20 kbits/sMass 3.55 kgPower 4.0 W

22

A post-acceleration voltage is used to obtain the required mass range and resolution. Four different post-acceleration levels can be used: 0, 300, 2500 and 4000 V. A low post-acceleration gives an opportunity to resolve the mass of heavy ions but does not allow, the lightest ions to be measured. The circular magnetic field strength is 0.13 T obtained with permanent magnets.

The particle “imaging” detector ( 360° field of view) is based on a large diameter (10 cm) microchannel plate assembly with position sensitive anode. It provides simultaneously the azimuth and mass per unit charge of the incident ions. The anode system can resolve 1024 points and the logics can identify pulses up to a frequency of 1 MHz. The mass detection technique provides the possibility to measure ions within a broad mass range. The instrument can be operated in several different modes.

The data processing and power conversion unit, DPU, comprises two 16 bit- processors (Texas 9989), 2.25 Mbyte FIFO memory, telemetry interface, and the experiment low-voltage power converters. The weight of the DPU is 2.83 kg and it has a power consumption of about 10 W (a large fraction is DC/DC converter losses). The DPU is used to control and command the experiment, as interface to the Freja telemetry and power systems, for on-board data handling, and processing of scientific data (e.g., computations of moments of the electron distributions).

The ion composition spectrometer was successfully deployed on 14 October 1992, but MATE was stuck in the stowed position reducing the field of view from 360° to 140°. The experiment was switched on for the first time with nominal high voltages on 20 October. Data are collected at two ground stations in the northern hemisphere, Esrange in Sweden and Prince Albert in Canada. Some data are also transmitted to a ground station at Syowa in the southern hemisphere. Two major types of commands are used to operate the experiment; hardware decoded commands to switch the +28 V on/off, (deployment on/off) and either of the two microprocessors off, and normal commands that are used for status check, high voltage adjustments, high voltage on/off, switching between different operational modes, changing levels of deflection voltages, selecting mass calibration sectors, changing processor programming etc.

A limited number of modes are used for the normal operation of the instrument. In the normal modes a variety of combinations between electron and ion data measurements are possible by loading programs to the on-board computers. A calibration mode can be used to identify the mass response of the TICS sensor. In this mode of operation all data from the TICS sensor are transmitted to the ground. In the normal mode of operation, data are collected from both the MATE and TICS sensor units. The highest possible time resolution is 10 ms. During that time the complete data set from the spectrographs is transferred to the DPU. Data are then normally integrated, or reduced, to meet the size of the telemetry rate occupied by the experiment. An event mode can be initiated by a triggering signal given by the Freja system. The Hot Plasma Experiment can not generate that type of signal but some of the other experiments have incorporated that possibility. A pre-programmed command is sent to the experiment if a trig signal is received. F3H is then normally operated in one of the pre-defined burst modes. High time resolution data from the MATE and TICS sensors are stored in the DPU memory and later transmitted to ground. Only a slight reduction of the data is made in the burst mode. The DPU memory is normally used to store data during approximately 30 seconds in burst mode. It is

23

also possible to operate the instrument in an orbit summary mode where data are collected with low resolution for a complete or large part of a Freja orbit.

Raw data from the experiment are processed in Kiruna. Freja summary plots (FSP) and special color summary plots (CSP) are available in an on-line data base. This data base has also been copied to several of the co-investigators and is regularly updated when more data have been collected with the experiment. The CSPs are produced with two time scales, one covering a whole pass (30 minute plots) and the other giving information with a higher time resolution (two minute plots). They contain three panels showing energy-time spectrograms for oxygen, helium, and hydrogen ions. The fourth panel gives the pitch angle of the ion observations, panel five and six show electron data from MATE and the corresponding pitch angle. Also TESP data are plotted in the regular CSPs.

More details on the Freja and Viking projects can be found in, e.g.:- Viking Scientific Aspects (the “Blue Book”), ed. K. Fredga, 1981.- The Viking Program, EOS 67,42,1986.- Viking and the Aurora, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 379-478,1987.- Scientific Results from the Swedish Viking Satellite: A 1988 Status Report,

B. Hultqvist, IRF Scientific Report 196,1988.- Viking Investigations of High-Latitude Plasma Processes, J. Geophys. R es.,

95, 5749-6131,1990.- The Freja Scientific Satellite, ed. M. André, IRF Scientific Report 214,1993.- The Freja Satellite Mission, EOS, 74, 29,1993.- Freja Special Issue, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

A series of papers with descriptions of the Freja experiments have been submitted to the Space Science Reviews.

24

ReferencesAkasofu, S.-I., Polar and Magnetospheric Substorms, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht,

1968.Albert, R. D., Nearly monoenergetic electron fluxes detected during a visible aurora, Phys. Rev.

Lett., 18, 369, 1967.Albert, R. D„ and P. J. Lindstrom, Auroral particle precipitation and trapping caused by

electrostatic double layers in the ionosphere, Science, 170,1398,1970.Alfvén, H., On the theory of magnetic storms and aurorae, Tellus, 10, 104,1958.André, M., and L. Eliasson, Electron acceleration by low frequency electric field fluctuations:

Electron conics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1073, 1992.André, M., and L. Eliasson, Some electron conic generation mechanisms, in Proceedings of AGU

Chapman Conference on Micro- and Mesoscale Phenomena in Space Plasmas, Kauai, in press, 1994.

Austin, J. B., J. S. Murphree, and J. Woch, Polar arcs: New results from Viking UV images, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 13545, 1993.

Axford, W. I., and C. O. Hines, A unifying theory of high latitude geophysical phenomena and geomagnetic storms, Can. J. Phys., 38, 1433, 1961.

Biermann, L., Solar corpuscular radiation and the interplanetary gas, Observatory, 77,109,1957.Block, L. P., and C.-G. Fälthammar, The role of magnetic-field-aligned electric fields in auroral

acceleration, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 5877, 1990.Boström, R., B. Holback, G. Holmgren, and H. Koskinen, Solitary structures in the

magnetospheric plasma observed by Viking, Physica Scripta, 39, 782,1989.Brekke, A., On the evolution in history of the concept of the auroral oval, EOS, 705,1984.Chang, T., G. B. Crew, and J. M. Retterer, Electromagnetic tornadoes in space: Ion conics along

auroral field lines generated by lower hybrid waves and electromagnetic turbulence in the ion cyclotron range of frequencies, Comput. Phys. Commun., 49, 61,1988.

Chapman, S., and V. C. A. Ferraro, A new theory of magnetic storms, Terr. Mag. Atmosph. Elect., 36, 77, 1931.

Chappell, C. R., T. E. Moore, and J. H. Waite, Jr., The ionosphere as a fully adequate source of plasma for the Earth’s magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 5896, 1987.

Chiu, Y. T., and M. Schulz, Self-consistent particle and parallel electrostatic field distribution in the magnetospheric-ionospheric auroral region, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 629,1978.

Coley, W. R., Spatial relationship of field-aligned currents, electron precipitation, and plasma convection in the auroral oval, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 7131, 1983.

Elphinstone, R. D., D. J. Heam, and J. S. Murphree, Dayside aurora poleward of the main auroral distribution: Implications for convection and mapping, in “Physical Signatures o f Magnetospheric Boundary Layer Processes,” Eds. J.A. Holtet and A. Egeland, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 189, 1994.

Evans, D. S., The observations of a near monoenergetic flux of auroral electrons, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 2315, 1968.

Evans, D. S., Precipitating electron fluxes formed by a magnetic field aligned potential difference, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2853, 1974.

Feldstein, Y. I ., Some problems concerning the morphology of auroras and magnetic disturbances at high latitudes, Geomag. Aeronomy, 3, 183, 1963.

Fennell, J. F., P. F. Mizera, and D. R. Croley, Low energy polar cap electrons during quiet times, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Cosmic Rays, 14, MG8-3, 1267,1975.

Frank, L. A., J. D. Craven, J. L. Burch, and J. D. Winningham, Polar views of the Earth's aurora with Dynamics Explorer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 1001, 1982.

Frank, L. A., J. D. Craven, D. A. Gumett, S. D. Shawhan, D. R. Weimer, J. L. Burch, J. D. Winningham, C. R. Chappell, J. H. Waite, R. A. Heelis, N. C. Maynard, M. Sugiura, W. K. Peterson, and E. G. Shelley, The theta aurora, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 3177, 1986.

Gold, T., Motions in the magnetosphere of the Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 64, 1219, 1950.Gomey, D. J., D. S. Evans, M. S. Gussenhoven, and P. F. Mizera, A multiple-satellite

observation of the high-latitude auroral activity on January 11, 1983, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 339, 1986.

Heikkila, J. D., Penetration of particles into the polar cap and auroral regions, in “Critical Problems of Magnetospheric Physics,” Ed. E. R. Dyer, IUCSTP Secretariat, Washington, D.C., 1972.

25

Hoffman, R. A., and D. S. Evans, Field-aligned electron bursts at high latitude observed by OGO- 4, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 6201, 1968.

Hoffman, R. A., R. A. Heelis, and J. S. Prasad, A sun-aligned arc observed by DMSP and AE-C, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 9697, 1985.

Hultqvist, B., R. Lundin, K. Stasiewicz, L. Block, P.-A. Lindqvist, G. Gustafsson, H. Koskinen, A. Bahnsen, T. A. Potemra, and L. J. Zanetti, Simultaneous observation of upward moving field-aligned energetic electrons and ions on auroral zone field lines, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 9765, 1988.

Ismail, S., and C.-I. Meng, A classification of polar cap auroral arcs, Planet. Space Sci., 30, 319, 1982.

Klumpar, D. M., A digest and comprehensive bibliography on transverse auroral acceleration, in Ion Acceleration in the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere, Ed. T. Chang, AGU, Washington, D. C., 389, 1986.

Knight, L., Parallel electric fields, Planet. Space Sci., 21, 741,1973.Lassen, K., Polar cap emissions, Danish Meteorological Institute Geophysical Papers, 1968.Lennartsson, W., On the magnetic mirroring as the basic cause of parallel electric fields, J.

Geophys. Res., 81, 5583, 1976.Lundin, R., G. Gustafsson, A. I. Eriksson, and G. Marklund, On the importance of high-altitude

low-frequency electric fluctuations for the escape of ionospheric ions, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 5905, 1990.

Lundin R., L. Eliasson, and J. S. Muiphree, The quiet time aurora and the magnetospheric configuration, in “Auroral Physics," Eds. C.-I. Meng, M.J. Rycroft, and L.A. Frank, Cambridge UP, 177,1991.

Lysak, R. L„ Generalized model of the ionospheric Alfvén resonator, in “Auroral Plasma Dynamics,” Ed. R. L. Lysak, Geophysical Monograph 80 American Geophysical Union, 121,1993.

Mcllwain, C., Direct measurements of particles producing visible auroras, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 2727, 1960.

Meng, C.-I., Polar cap arcs and the plasma sheet,Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 273, 1981.Menietti, J. D„ and J. L. Burch, “Electron conic” signatures observed in the nightside auroral zone

and over the polar cup, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5345, 1985.Mishin, V. M., A. D. Bazarzhapov, T. I. Saifudinova, S. B. Lunyushkin, D. Sh. Shirapov, J.

Woch, L. Eliasson, H. Opgenoorth, and J. S. Murphree, Different methods to determine the polar cap area, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 44,1207,1992.

Murphree, J. S., C. D. Anger, and L. L. Cogger, The instantaneous relationship between polar cap and oval auroras at time of northward interplanetary magnetic field, Can. J. Phys., 60, 349, 1982.

Ness, N. F., The earth's magnetic tail, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 2989, 1965.Obara, T., M. Kitayama, T. Mukai, N. Kaya, J. S. Murphree, and L. L. Cogger, Simultaneous

observations of sun-aligned polar cap arcs in both hemispheres by Exos-C and Viking, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 713, 1988.

Peterson, W. K., and E. G. Shelley, Origin of the plasma in a cross-polar cap auroral feature (theta aurora), J. Geophys. Res., 89, 6729, 1984.

Piddington, J. H., Geomagnetic storm theory, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 93, 1960.Reiff, P. H., H. L. Collin, J. D. Craven, J. L. Burch, J. D. Winningham, E. G. Shelley, L. A.

Frank, and M. A. Friedman, Determination of auroral electrostatic potentials using high- and low-altitude particle distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 7441, 1988.

Sandahl, I., R. Lundin, and L. Eliasson, The hot plasma spectrometers on Viking, KGI Technical Report 035, 1985.

Snyder, A. L., and S.-I. Akasofu, Major auroral substorm features in the dark sector observed by a USAF DMSP satellite, Planet. Space Sci., 22, 1511, 1974.

Starkov, G. V., Auroral heights in the polar cap, Geomag. Aeronomy, 36,1968.Stone, E. C., Local time dependence of non-Störmer cutoff for 1.5-MeV protons in quiet

geomagnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 3577, 1964.Troshichev, O. A., and A. Nishida, Pattern of electron and ion precipitation in the northern and

southern polar regions for northward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 8337, 1992.

Vago, J. L., P. M. Kintner, S. W. Chesney, R. L. Amoldy, K. A. Lynch, T. E. Moore, and C. J. Pollock, Transverse ion acceleration by localized lower hybrid waves in the topside auroral ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 16.935, 1992.

26

Winningham, J. D., and W. J. Heikkila, Polar cap auroral electron fluxes observed with ISIS 1, J.Geophys. Res., 79, 949, 1974.

W inningham, J. D., F. Yasuhara, S.-I. Akasofu, and W. J. Heikkila, The latitudinal morphology of 10-eV to 10-keV electron fluxes during magnetically quiet and disturbed times in the 2100- 0300 MLT sector, /. Geophys. Res., 80 3148, 1975.

W inningham, J. D „ J. L. Burch, and R. A. Frahm, Bands of ions and angular V’s: A conjugate manifestation of ionospheric ion acceleration, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 1749,1984.

Zanetti, L. J., T. A. Potemra, T. Iijima, W. Baumjohann, and P. F. Bythrow, Ionospheric and Birkeland current distributions for northward interplanetary magnetic field: Inferred polar convection, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 7453, 1984.

PublicationsThe understanding of phenomena in the auroral region requires a broad

international collaboration and the use of different measurement techniques. It has been a great pleasure for me to work together with colleagues in this field during several years. The list of publications below is one proof that we have been fairly successful. I will take the opportunity to thank all good friends and hope that we will have as good co-operation in the future. It has been very stimulating to participate in sounding rocket campaigns and the analysis of data from the Viking and Freja satellites. Reports from most of the studies that I have participated in are listed below:

Sounding rockets and ESRO 4Eliasson, L„ L.-Å. Holmgren, K. Rönnmark, Pitch angle and energy distributions of auroral

electrons measured by the ESRO 4 satellite, Planet. Space Sci., 27, 87-97,1979.Sandahl, I., L. Eliasson, and R. Lundin, Electron spectra over discrete auroras as measured by the

Substorm-GEOS rockets, Proceedings of the Vth ESA-PAC Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research, ESA SP-152,257-262,1980.

Eliasson, L., R. Lundin, and I. Sandahl, Some results from the particle experiment on board the Barium-GEOS rocket, Proceedings of the 5th ESA-PAC Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon, Programmes and Related Research, ESA SP-152,263-268,1980.

Sandahl, I., L. Eliasson, and R. Lundin, Rocket observations of precipitating electrons over a pulsating aurora, Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 309-312, 1980.

Opgenoorth, H., R. Pellinen, W. Baumjohann, E. Nielsen, G. Marklund, and L. Eliasson, Three- dimensional current flow and particle precipitation in a westward travelling surge (observed during the Barium-GEOS rocket experiment), J. Geophys. Res., 88, 3138-3152,1983.

Eliasson, L., I. Sandahl, and R., Lundin, Observations of auroral electrons with sounding rockets and the GEOS 2 geostationary satellite, in “Results of the ARCAD 3 Project and of Recent Programmes in Magnetospheric Physics Toulouse 84,” 797-802, 1985.

Sandahl, I., and L. Eliasson, Scattering of electrons in the equatorial plane during a pulsating aurora, Proceedings of the 7th ESA-PAC Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research, ESA SP-229,103-109,1985.

Holmgren, G., G. Marklund, L. Eliasson, H. Opgenoorth, F. Söraas, F. Primdahl, G. Haerendel, and P.M. Kintner, Ionospheric response to chemical releases in the high latitude E and F regions, Adv. Space Res., 8, no 1, (1)79-(1)83, 1988.

Eliasson, L., R. Lundin, and G. Holmgren, Energetic electron enhancements due to the TOR chemical release, Adv. Space Res., 8, no 1, (1)93-(1)97,1988.

Sandahl, I., L. Eliasson, and B. Holback, Investigation of precipitating electrons during an auroral breakup, Physica Scripta, 37, 506-511, 1988.

VikingSandahl, I., R. Lundin, and L. Eliasson, The hot plasma spectrometers on Viking, KGI Technical

Report 035, 1985.Eliasson, L., R. Lundin, and J. S. Murphree, Polar cap arcs observed by the Viking satellite,

Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 451-454, 1987.Lundin, R., L. Eliasson, B. Hultqvist, and K. Stasiewicz, Plasma energization on amoral field

lines as observed by the Viking spacecraft, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14,443-446,1987.

27

Eliasson, L., Characteristics of particle acceleration at high latitude, Proceedings of the 8th ESA Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research, ESA SP-270, 51-54, 1987.

Eliasson, L., and R. Lundin, Acceleration/heating processes on auroral field lines as observed by the Viking spacecraft, Proceedings of the 21stESLAB Symposium, ESA SP-275, 87-91,1987.

Lundin, R., L. Eliasson, and I. Sandahl, First VIKING results: Hot plasma, Physica Scripta, 37, 482-490, 1988.

Pottelette, R., M. Malingre, A. Bahnsen, L. Eliasson, K. Staciewicz, R. E. Erlandson, and G. Marklund, Viking observations of bursts of intense broadband noise in the source regions of auroral kilometric radiation, Annales Geophysicae, 6, (5), 573-586,1988.

Bahnsen, A., B. M. Pedersen, M. Jespersen, E. Ungstrup, L. Eliasson, J. S. Murphree, R. D. Elphinstone, L. Blomberg, G. Holmgren, and LJ . Zanetti, Viking observations at the source region of auroral kilometric radiation, J. Geophys. Res., 94,6643-6654, 1989.

Kirkwood, S., L. Eliasson, H. Opgenoorth, and A. Pellinen-Wannberg, A study of .auroral electron acceleration using the EISCAT radar and the Viking satellite, Adv. Space Res., 9,(5)49-(5)52, 1989.

Kirkwood, S., L. Eliasson, I. Häggström, and P. N. Collis, Enhanced electron density layers in the high-latitude lower ionosphere, Proceedings of the 9th ESA Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research, ESA SP-291, 35-40,1989.

Opgenoorth, H. J., B. Bromage, D. Fontaine, C. La Hoz, A. Huuskonen, H. Kohl, U.-P. Lpvhaug, G. Wannberg, G. Gustafsson, J. S. Murphree, L. Eliasson, G. Marklund, T. A. Potemra, S. Kirkwood, E. Nielsen, and J.-E. Wahlund, Coordinated observations with EISCAT and the Viking satellite - The decay of a westward travelling surge, Annales Geophysicae, 7, N°5, 479-500, 1989.

Khrushchinskiy, A. A., A. A. Ostapenko, G. Gustafsson, L. Eliasson, and I. Sandahl, An estimate of the position of the source of microbursts in the streams of precipitating electrons from the Viking satellite data, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 29, No 6, 886-888,1989.

Kirkwood, S., and L. Eliasson, Energetic particle precipitation in the substorm growth phase measured by EISCAT and Viking, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 6025-6038, 1990.

Brüning, K., L. P. Block, G. T. Marklund, L. Eliasson, R. Pottelette, J.S. Murphree, T.A. Potemra, and S. Perraut, Viking observations above a postnoon aurora, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 6039-6050, 1990.

Sandahl, I., L. Eliasson, A. Pellinen-Wannberg, G. Rostoker, L. P. Block, R. E. Erlandson, E. Friis-Christensen, B. Jacobsen, H. Lühr, and J. S. Murphree, Distribution of auroral precipitation at midnight during a magnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 6051-6072, 1990.

Lilensten, J., D. Fontaine, W. Kofman., L. Eliasson, C. Lathuillere, and E. S. Oran, Electron energy budget in the high-latitude ionosphere during Viking/EISCAT coordinated measurements, J. Geophvs. Res., 95, 6081-6092, 1990.

Lundin, R., and L. Eliasson, Auroràl energization processes, Ann. Geophysicae, 9, 202-223, 1991.

Lundin R., L. Eliasson, and J. S. Murphree, The quiet time aurora and the magnetospheric configuration, in Auroral Physics eds. C.-I. Meng, M.J. Rycroft, and L.A. Frank, Cambridge UP, 177-193, 1991.

André, M., and L. Eliasson, Electron acceleration by low frequency electric field fluctuations: electron conics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1073-1076, 1992.

Pedersen, B. M., R. Pottelette, L. Eliasson, J. S. Murphree, R. D. Elphinstone, A. Bahnsen, and M. Jespersen, Auroral kilometric radiation from transpolar arcs, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 10567- 10573, 1992.

Mishin, V., J. Woch, L. Eliasson, T. Saifudinova, A. Bazarzhapov, D. Shirapov, and S. Lunyushkin, Substorm scenario with two active phases: A study of CDAW-9C events, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Substorms (ICS-1) ESA-SP335, 383-389,1992.

Mishin, V. M., A. D. Bazarzhapov, T. I. Saifudinova, S. B. Lunyushkin, D. Sh. Shirapov, J. Woch, L. Eliasson, H. Opgenoorth, and J.S. Murphree, Different methods to determine the polar cap area, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 44,1207-1214, 1992.

André, M., and L. Eliasson, Some electron conic generation mechanisms, in Proceedings of AGU Chapman Conference on Micro- and Mesoscale Phenomena in Space Plasmas, Kauai, in press, 1994.

Menietti, J. D., D. R. Weimer, M. André, and L. Eliasson, DE-1 and Viking observations associated with electron conical distributions, accepted for publication in J. Geophys. Res.,1994.

28

Eliasson, L., M. André, R. Lundin, R. Pottelette, G. Marklund, and G. Holmgren, Observations of electron conics by the Viking satellite., submitted to J. Geophys. Res., 1994.

Freja studiesNorberg, O., and L. Eliasson, The hot plasma spectrometers on Freja, Proceedings of the 10th

ESA Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research, ESA SP-317, 41-44, 1991.

Eliasson, L., F3H Hot Plasma Experiment, in The Freja Scientific Satellite, editor M. André, IRF Scientific Report 214, 1993.

André, M., P. Norqvist, A. Vaivads, L. Eliasson, O. Norberg, A. Eriksson, and B. Holback, Transverse ion energization and wave emissions observed by the Freja satellite, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Boehm, M. H., G. Paschmann, J. Clemmons, G. Haerendel, L. Eliasson, and R. Lundin, Freja observations of narrow inverted-V electron precipitation by the two-dimensional electron spectrometer, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Eliasson, L., M. André, A. Eriksson, P. Norqvist, O. Norberg, R. Lundin, B. Holback, H. Koskinen, H. Borg, and M. Boehm, Freja observations of heating and precipitation of positive ions, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Eriksson, A.I., B. Holback, P.-O. Dovner, R. Boström, G. Holmgren, M. André, L. Eliasson, and P.M. Kintner, Freja observations of correlated small-scale density depletions and enhanced lower hybrid waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Erlandson, R. E., L. J. Zanetti, M.H. Acuna, A. Eriksson, L. Eliasson, M. H. Boehm, and L. Blomberg, Freja observations of electromagnetic ion cyclotron (ELF) waves and transverse oxygen ion acceleration on auroral field lines, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Klumpar, D. M., L. Eliasson, O. Norberg, Freja observations of ion dispersion precipitation signatures near the inner edge of the plasma sheet, submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett., 1993.

Lundin, R, L. Eliasson, G. Haerendel, M. Boehm, and B. Holback, Large-scale plasma density cavities observed by Freja, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Nilsson, H., S. Kirkwood, L. Eliasson, and O. Norberg, The ionospheric signature of the cusp - A case study using Freja and the Sondrestrom radar, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Norberg, O., M. Yamauchi, L. Eliasson, and R. Lundin, Freja observations of multiple injection events in the cusp, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Stasiewicz, G. Gustafsson, G. Holmgren, B. Holback, L. Eliasson, P. M. Kintner, and L. Zanetti, Wave environment inside inverted-V electron events observed by Freja, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, 1994.

Lundin, R., L. Eliasson, O. Norberg, G. Marklund, L. Zanetti, B. Whalen, B. Holback, J.S. Murphree, G. Haerendel, M. Boehm, and G. Paschmann, First high resolution measurements by the Freja satellite, accepted for publication in Proceedings from the Yosemite Meeting, 1994.

Boehm, M., G.Paschmann, J. Clemmons, H. Hoefner, R. Frenzel, M. Erti, G. Haerendel, P. Hill, H. Lauche, L. Eliasson, R. Lundin, The TESP electron spectrometer and correlator (F7) on Freja, accepted for publication in Space Sei. Rev., 1994.

Eliasson, L., O. Norberg, R. Lundin, K. Lundin, S. Olsen, H. Borg, M. André, H. Koskinen, P. Riihelä, M. Boehm, and B. Whalen, The Freja Hot Plasma Experiment - Instrument and first results, accepted for publication in Space Sei. Rev., 1994.

Whalen, B. A., D. J. Knudsen, A. W. Yau, A. M. Pilon, T. A. Cameron, J.F . Sebesta, D.J . McEwen, J. A. Koehler, N. D. Lloyd, G. Pocobelli, J. G. Laframboise, W. Li, R. Lundin, L. Eliasson, S. Watanabe, G. S. Cambell, The Freja F3C Cold Plasma Analyzer, accepted for publication in Space Sei. Rev., 1994.

AcknowledgementsThere are many that have made significant contributions in different ways to this

work. I wish to thank you all for assistance and making my time at the Institute exciting, stimulating, and interesting.

Kjell Rönnmark introduced me to the activities at the Institute a long time ago. From Lars-Åke Holmgren and Hans Borg I learnt how satellite experiments behave in real life. Thank you for all support during my time in Umeå and after I moved to Kiruna.

29

It is a pleasure to acknowledge the support that I have received from Rickard Lundin and Ingrid Sandahl. Their experience in sounding rocket as well as satellite project activities has been of outmost importance for this work.

Kjell Lundin has been the technical manager for most of the projects that I have been involved in. I highly appreciate his very dedicated work, always with tight schedules and impossible demands. The experienced and skillful engineering and technical staff at IRF, headed by Sven Olsen and Kjell Lundin, have made it possible for us to receive excellent scientific data. It was a hard time to meet the deadlines for delivery of the Freja plasma instrument, special thanks to the above mentioned and Joakim Gimholt, Jonas Olsen, and Pekka Riihelä and of course, Olle Norberg who made very important contributions to the Freja project.

Programmers are essential for the success of a project. I still do not understand how Hans Borg managed to get the Freja microprocessors operational Many others have contributed with software for data analysis. Arne Moström has done most of it for the results presented here.

The co-operation and many hours of stimulating discussions with Mats André have been very valuable. This isirue also for the recent co-operation with Anders Eriksson. Bengt Hultqvist has always been encouraging and willing to share his experiences. Many thanks also to Joachim Woch, Gunnar Holmgren, Bengt Holback, Georg Gustafsson, Göran Marklund, Hannu Koskinen and the Viking and Freja Science and Engineering Teams for numerous discussions on essential questions about space physics and life on earth.

The Viking and Freja projects have been managed by the Swedish Space Corporation under contract from the Swedish National Space Board. I wish to thank SSC staff at Esrange and in Solna for excellent support during the many projects that I have participated in. This research was financially supported by the Swedish National Space Board.

Special thanks also to Birgitta Määttä, Stig Björklund, Torbjörn Lövgren and the administrative staff at IRF.

Most important of all for this work is my wife Maj-Lis. She has spent many lonely evenings during instrument calibrations, sounding rocket and satellite campaigns, conferences, etc., throughout the years. This would not have become a reality without her support and patience. Finally I am highly indepted to Johan, Erik, and David for not complaining too much about extra work when I have been away from home.

30

Summary of PapersPaper 1 “Pitch Angle and Energy Distributions of Auroral Electrons Measured

by the ESRO 4 Satellite” is based on data from particle instruments on board the ESRO 4 satellite. The satellite was launched on 22 November 1972 and collected data until re-entry in April 1974. The main objectives with the mission were studies of the neutral atmosphere, the ionosphere, and auroral particles. Particle data from sounding rockets and satellites had shown that a forbidden region in phase space was frequently filled with particles. In this paper we demonstrate a scenario that could explain that type of distribution, a population trapped by the magnetic mirror force below and a parallel electric field above the satellite. Our hypothesis was that the auroral electrons are accelerated by a quasi-static parallel electric field above the ESRO 4 altitude (perigeum 245 and apogeum 1.177 km). This electric field can in principle be considered as constant on time scales comparable to electron transit times. Previous explanations of these locally trapped electrons included backscattered and secondary particles, but without a plausible explanation for how they could reach this region of phase space. The parallel electric field may, however, be time dependent. If the time it takes to reach maximum potential is long compared to the time it takes for electrons to move from the acceleration region to the mirror point and back to the acceleration region, then the particle parallel energy will be smaller than the parallel electric field component. The electron will become trapped in a region were no particles should exist according to the simple picture of injecting a particle population from above, neglecting particles below and the time history of the intensity of the electric field. Comparing theoretical calculations with the observed angular and energy distributions gave a very good agreement.

Paper 2 “Polar Cap Arcs Observed by the Viking Satellite” discusses some preliminary Viking results on auroral structures at high geomagnetic latitudes. Sun- aligned arcs and/or theta aurora had been observed with other-spacecraft and from ground based observatories but the magnetic field line topology during this type of events was not settled. The paper discusses acceleration mechanisms leading to the precipitation of electrons into the high latitude atmosphere, at latitudes poleward of the statistical oval. It was found that the particle characteristics were in principle similar to those observed in the night-time auroral arcs at more normal auroral latitudes. The acceleration voltage was, however, found to be considerably lower, of the order of a few keV. Another conclusion was that these arcs are located on closed magnetic field lines. This fact was based on the shape of the angular distribution of electrons, the presence of plasma sheet-type positive ion populations, and structured low intensity electron fluxes in the region between the ordinary auroral oval and the high latitude arc.

Paper 3 “ Acceleration/Heating Processes on Auroral Field Lines as Observed by the Viking Spacecraft” shows some characteristics of the particle distributions observed by the Viking particle experiment. It demonstrates the necessity to perform measurements with full pitch angle coverage and high temporal and spatial resolution. The particle distributions show a large variability with signatures of acceleration both above and below the Viking altitude. A possible generation mechanism of electron conics as well as observational evidence of electron acceleration by electric fields parallel to the geomagnetic field lines are briefly discussed.

Paper 4 “Auroral Energization Processes” gives a fairly extended review of auroral acceleration and heating mechanisms in the altitude region from about 1000 km up to 2 Re. Viking results are discussed after a short historical resume and discussion of existing theories and status of observational results. Signatures in the particle distribution function such as size and shape of the loss cone and “mono- energetic” energy distributions with different degrees of field alignment, contain information on processes that have influenced the particles. The importance and

31

proof of the existence of quasi-static parallel electric fields are discussed. It was found that so called static acceleration can indeed explain major features in the electron and ion distributions. The static parallel electric is, however, not capable of explaining all features. Electron conics and perpendicular heated positive ions are created in a different way. Proposed theories are reviewed and conclusions given on what fit the Viking observations. The importance of low frequency fluctuating electric fields is stressed and discussed. It is, e.g., observed that the ion conics are correlated with large amplitude fluctuations in regions of low plasma density. A good correlation is found between the ion conic temperature and the power spectral density of low frequency fluctuations.

Paper 5 “Observations of Electron Conics by the Viking Satellite” gives some statistics on almost 200 electron conic events observed by Viking. The particle data are used together with information on wave activity at low and high frequencies. It is found that the electron conics are more frequently observed in the dusk sector compared to the dawn sector. The electron conics are always observed together with ion beams or elevated conics, indicating the presence of parallel acceleration below the Viking altitude. Possible heating/acceleration mechanisms were tested by computer simulations in papers by André and Eliasson [1992,1994] showing that several mechanisms are in principle able to explain the electron observations. Some mechanisms are, however, less likely if one takes into account also the ion observations. We favour the theory that low frequency electric field fluctuations in the parallel component are in “resonance” with the electron travel time below the parallel electric field. Broadband hiss and upper hybrid waves are often seen in the electron conic region but it is not