augmented)reality)) discovery) · search)vs.)discovery) search discovery’...
TRANSCRIPT
Augmented Reality Discovery
Ninth AR Standards Community Mee:ng May 30, 2013
Is there an AR experience here?
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 2
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 3
Or here?
Now Let’s Leap Ahead
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 4
Everywhere is AR enriched • Every object, place and person is poten:ally an AR experience – From birth, design – Throughout and beyond its “life”
• Mul:ple sources of content for every target – Commercial data – Public data – Personal data – Group data
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 5
Key Assump:ons • No technology constraints – Unlimited processing, storage, memory, bandwidth, etc
• Sensors are small, cheap, ubiquitous, connected – Wearable compu:ng – Internet of Things
• Content “ready” (condi:oned) for use in AR experiences – Very small – Many business models available – Open data – More content assets than human or machine can process
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 6
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 7
There’s a charging sta:on
A pedestrian is approaching
The driver is spiritual
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 8
No adver:sements No CTAs
Call to Ac:on
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 9
Automa:c, Con:nuous Discovery
• Personalized alerts/no:fica:ons – Not always presented in AR view
• Just in :me • Can be ignored • Can be shared • Can be validated
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 10
Search vs. Discovery Search Discovery
User ini:ates (text, speech, image) Sensors are con:nuously “scanning”
Global (constrained by :me, space, etc) Local (or another defined constraint)
Results immediate (list, map) Results con:nuously
Query is performed on digital data (structured data)
“Query” is being performed on the physical world (unstructured data) and digital data
Provided by the search engine provider Provided by the Discovery “System” provider
Agen:on focused on query Ignored, Par:al agen:on, full agen:on
New digital data always increasing Physical world and digital data always increasing
LET’S CONTINUE THIS TABLE…
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 11
Other Analogies?
• Like maps for places? • Like Domain Name Service (DNS) for domains? • Like AppStores for na:ve applica:ons?
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 12
Types of Discovery • Temporal
– I only want live data for the present – I want to discover historical digital assets or experiences – I want to discover the future
• Social – I only want to discover what my friends have done – I want to be alerted when I pass or interact with someone who is 1 or
more degrees removed from me • Spa:al
– My device can only discover in 10 meter circumference – Only discover indoor or only outdoor
• Financial – Only discover what I can earn credits for – Only discover “open data” at no fee to me – Only discover sponsored AR experiences
5/6/13 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 13
Levels of Discovery
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 14
My sensors are on, put what they find in the (whose?) catalog, credit me for having contributed
This (target) matches all (or some of) my criteria (temporal, spa:al, etc) and my personalized system can
use it to make sugges:ons (an alert)
If metadata associated with this asset that my system discovers does not match others, let me know and I will have op:on to take further ac:on
This experience is one that I’m in mode to acquire. No:fy me using [op:ons
configured by user]
When AR Discovery Will Mager
• Like the search for the Web, AR Discovery is important once ecosystem approaches or there is – Cri:cal mass of users enabled with AR players – Cri:cal mass of content
• Does it have to be defined in categories (see metadata)? • Exceeds that which can appear on a map or a list
– Agreed upon conven:ons for metadata – Open and interoperable systems
• Users place value on an:cipatory services, not ac:ve search or simply serendipity
5/6/13 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 15
Deeper Dimensions of Discovery
• Experience detec:on/discovery storage – Local, cloud, fog – Maps, Catalogs/directory experiences or services – Equivalent of DNS for domains? Web servers? – Emergency or “extraordinary” experience levels?
• Senng permissions to/of experience discovery
5/6/13 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 16
Establishing (and keeping) Digital Asset Provenance
• How is digital data “object” iden:fied? – Object Iden:fica:on (NISO) – Ins:tu:onal Iden:fica:on (NISO)
• How trustworthy is the digital data my system is using for this AR experience? – PROV (W3C)
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 17
AR Discovery Business Models
• Public service – DNS
• Business pays – Adver:sing (analogous to search)
• User pays – Per discovery – Subscrip:on
5/6/13 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 18
Discussion Notes • Pub Sub
– Solves the provenance issue • Arty sees 3 phases/issues
– How/what is the method of crea:ng – How do you catalog – Filtering the catalog content
• Mikel-‐volume search-‐searching the volume around you • Frank (Augmate) CMS fro stores • Dirk
– Wondering why search isn’t good enough paradigm – Isn’t discovery another word for Google Now – People know what they are search/looking for
• Kaliya – Search is “look in a giant database” – Discover is not
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 19
Discussion Notes (2) • Chris Stapleton
– How can anyone an:cipate what you don’t know? – Search is not discovery
• Kaliya – With Google you end up with a filter bubble – Google Now is a case where the provider sets the knobs without giving
the user control • Carl Byers
– Discovery sends us down a rabbit hole that is too close to serach – I want an advisory service, learning algorithms (like case based
learning systems) • Mikel
– Where do we put the content that user sees – Wherever the network, the content is available… the spa:al DNS
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 20
Discussion Notes (3) • Carl
– The system does discovery – The user sets the filters and receives advisory (alerts and no:fica:ons)
• Frank M – User has set the most likely content you are looking for…
• Loca:on based hook up service – Types of person you want to see, mutual agrac:on – User publishes data, depending on what you want to discover – Systems like this are already at play (available)
• Chris Stapleton – Layering of experiences, intented or not, – Mixture that have never been done
• Frank M. – Emergence (ants pheremon trails) – Person has a brighter signal, can s:ll view… – Trails that are around-‐small simple things that build up to a complex rich experience
• Dirk – Catalog of geospa:al data – Also indexed through everything that passed through the system to make more prominent what was viewed
at a lot .. Self-‐fulfilling prophecy
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 21
Discussion Notes (4) • Dirk
– Very difficult to propose new content – You need a catastrophy to get the ants to follow another route
• Kaliya – We aren’t ants, how do those with large Twiger followers deal with their followers
• Frank M. – Echo chamber risk – You only have your view of the world, needs to be some randomiza:on built in
• Chris – Or you are mining and always genng something new.
May 30, 2013 PEREY Research & Consul:ng 22
Chris:ne Perey PEREY Research & Consul:ng
www.perey.com [email protected] +41 79 436 68 69