attachments - city of belmont · no . name and address description of affected property, lot no.,...

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING Attachments 27 April 2010

City of Belmont

Attachments

Ordinary Council Meeting

Held

27 April 2010

A1


Ordinary Council 27/04/10

Item 12.1 refers

Attachment 1

Scheme Amendment 59 Report

A2



Item 12.1 refers

Attachment 2

Scheme Amendment 59 Submission Table

A42

PLA

NN

ING

AN

D D

EVEL

OPM

ENT

AC

T 20

05

SCH

EDU

LE O

F SU

BMIS

SIO

NS

TO

CIT

Y O

F BE

LMO

NT

TOW

N P

LAN

NIN

G S

CH

EME

NO

. 14

AMEN

DM

ENT

NO

. 59

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

1.

MJ

Har

ding

Lo

t 3 T

eleg

raph

R

oad,

Esp

eran

ce

4/27

Har

dey

Roa

d,

Asc

ot

Obj

ectio

n 1.

A

n ex

istin

g no

n-co

nfor

min

g us

e is

alre

ady

allo

wed

, in

esse

nce

the

prop

osal

will

al

low

for a

noth

er n

on-

conf

orm

ing

use.

2.

Mot

or v

ehic

le w

ash

is

unac

cept

able

bas

ed o

n:

• C

urre

nt n

oise

is a

lread

y un

acce

ptab

le. A

dded

no

ise

from

car

was

h,

vehi

cles

and

occ

upan

ts

(inc.

radi

os e

tc).

• C

hem

ical

was

h sp

ray

• N

oise

from

del

iver

ies

(load

ing

/ unl

oadi

ng)

• P

ropo

sed

hour

s of

op

erat

ion

• Li

kelih

ood

of a

dditi

onal

lig

htin

g / l

ight

impa

ct

• V

isua

l im

pact

of 3

-5m

hi

gh b

uild

ings

3.

Not

es th

at p

lann

ing

repo

rt id

entif

ies

a lik

ely

impa

ct o

n ad

join

ing

resi

dent

ial

prop

ertie

s.

Par

tially

uph

old.

M

atte

rs r

aise

d sh

ould

be

ad

dres

sed

at

the

deve

lopm

ent

stag

e bu

t th

e is

sues

ca

n be

re

info

rced

by

be

ing

spec

ified

as

is

sues

fo

r co

nsid

erat

ion

on l

odge

men

t of

an

y pr

opos

al.

1.

The

fact

that

ther

e is

an

exis

ting

non-

conf

orm

ing

use

is n

ot a

reas

on to

reje

ct th

e Am

endm

ent.

2.

N

oted

. •

Noi

se (c

urre

nt a

nd

futu

re) i

s re

quire

d to

co

mpl

y w

ith

Env

ironm

enta

l P

rote

ctio

n (N

oise

) R

egul

atio

ns 1

997.

The

no

ise

impa

ct fr

om

addi

tiona

l dev

elop

men

t on

site

will

be

dete

rmin

ed a

t de

velo

pmen

t app

licat

ion

stag

e.

• A

pplic

ant h

as a

dvis

ed

that

the

inte

nded

was

h un

it ha

s au

tom

ated

do

ors

at e

ntry

/ ex

it w

hich

mus

t be

clos

ed fo

r

A43

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

4.

Que

stio

ns in

vest

men

t in

a ca

r w

ash

tailo

red

for a

n ex

tra 1

4 ve

hicl

es p

er d

ay –

it is

like

ly

that

this

will

be

grea

ter,

henc

e th

e in

vest

men

t by

BP.

5.

Ant

i-soc

ial b

ehav

iour

, rad

ios

and

sque

alin

g ty

res

may

be

mor

e no

isy

that

the

was

h un

it its

elf.

6.

3

min

ute

car m

ovem

ent i

s un

acce

ptab

le.

7.

10

:00p

m is

too

late

for

cess

atio

n of

ope

ratio

n of

car

w

ash

havi

ng re

gard

to

prox

imity

of n

eigh

bour

s

8.

Car

was

hes

have

bee

n pr

oven

sci

entif

ical

ly to

co

ntrib

ute

to b

reed

ing

bact

eria

that

can

lead

to

Legi

onna

ires

dise

ase

due

to

recy

cled

wat

er, w

arm

sto

rage

ta

nks

and

wat

er v

apou

r. 7

deat

hs in

Mel

bour

ne.

unit

to o

pera

te. T

o be

co

nsid

ered

furth

er a

t DA

stag

e.

• A

s pe

r dot

poi

nt 1

. •

Hou

rs o

f ope

ratio

n of

C

onve

nien

ce S

tore

is

curr

ently

24

hr a

day

/ 7

days

a w

eek.

No

chan

ge

prop

osed

. Ve

hicl

e W

ash

inte

nded

to b

e lim

ited

to

com

ply

with

EP

(Noi

se)

Reg

ulat

ions

. Can

be

furth

er c

onsi

dere

d at

DA

stag

e.

• To

be

cons

ider

ed a

t DA

st

age.

•

To b

e co

nsid

ered

at D

A

stag

e.

3.

N

oted

. Maj

ority

of i

mpa

cts

on a

djoi

ning

land

use

s w

ill be

dev

elop

men

t pro

posa

l sp

ecifi

c an

d co

nsid

ered

at

DA

sta

ge.

4.

N

oted

. Per

sona

l opi

nion

.

5.

Valid

poi

nt b

ut n

ot a

land

us

e sp

ecifi

c m

atte

r. C

ounc

il to

pro

vide

max

imum

en

cour

agem

ent t

o bu

sine

ss

oper

ator

to a

ppro

pria

tely

m

anag

e.

6.

N

oted

. Per

sona

l opi

nion

.

A44

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

7.

To b

e fu

rther

con

side

red

at

DA

sta

ge.

8.

Pr

opos

ed c

ar w

ash

inte

nded

to

be

cold

wat

er w

ash

only

. N

o ca

ses

of L

egio

nnai

re’s

di

seas

e in

WA

asso

ciat

ed

with

car

was

hes.

Typ

ical

ly

asso

ciat

ed w

ith a

ir-co

nditi

onin

g un

its, s

oil /

po

tting

mix

es a

nd m

ore

hum

id c

limat

es. T

o be

m

anag

ed b

y bu

sine

ss

oper

ator

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith

heal

th re

gula

tions

.

2.

RN

Kem

p 3/

27 H

arde

y R

oad,

Asc

ot

3/27

Har

dey

Roa

d,

Asc

ot

Obj

ectio

n

1.

Con

cern

ed a

bout

and

st

rong

ly d

isag

ree

with

the

prop

osed

car

was

h.

2.

A

n ex

istin

g au

tom

atic

car

w

ash

is lo

cate

d ac

ross

the

road

.

3.

Cur

rent

ly a

n ex

istin

g qu

iet

neig

hbou

rhoo

d an

d se

e no

ne

ed fo

r dis

turb

ance

like

ly to

be

gen

erat

ed fr

om th

e ca

r w

ash,

par

ticul

arly

: •

Noi

se

• P

ollu

tant

s / g

rey

wat

er

mis

t

Par

tially

uph

old.

M

atte

rs r

aise

d sh

ould

be

ad

dres

sed

at

the

deve

lopm

ent

stag

e bu

t th

e is

sues

ca

n be

re

info

rced

by

be

ing

spec

ified

as

is

sues

fo

r co

nsid

erat

ion

on l

odge

men

t of

an

y pr

opos

al.

1.

N

oted

.

2.

The

car

was

h ac

ross

th

e ro

ad i

s a

self-

oper

ated

car

w

ash.

Th

e pr

opos

ed

car

was

h is

au

tom

atic

. C

ompe

ting

busi

ness

is n

ot a

pl

anni

ng c

onsi

dera

tion.

3.

Not

ed.

• N

oise

(c

urre

nt

and

futu

re)

is

requ

ired

to

A45

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

com

ply

with

E

nviro

nmen

tal

Pro

tect

ion

(Noi

se)

Reg

ulat

ions

19

97.

The

nois

e im

pact

fro

m

addi

tiona

l de

velo

pmen

t on

site

will

be

give

n du

e co

nsid

erat

ion

at

deve

lopm

ent

appl

icat

ion

stag

e.

• A

pplic

ant

has

advi

sed

that

the

int

ende

d w

ash

unit

has

auto

mat

ed

door

s at

en

try

/ ex

it w

hich

mus

t be

clos

ed fo

r un

it to

op

erat

e.

To

be

cons

ider

ed fu

rther

at D

A

stag

e.

3.

C

O &

J D

anks

4/

27 H

arde

y R

oad,

Asc

ot

4/27

Har

dey

Roa

d,

Asc

ot

Obj

ect

1.

Dis

appo

inte

d th

at th

e C

ounc

il fe

els

the

need

to a

men

d TP

S14

to a

llow

thes

e ad

ditio

nal u

ses.

2.

Has

pre

viou

sly

disa

gree

d w

ith

prop

osal

how

ever

Cou

ncil

is

now

mak

ing

it ea

sier

for t

he

serv

ice

stat

ion

to c

arry

on

and

do w

hate

ver t

hey

wan

t. 3.

M

ain

conc

ern

is w

ater

spr

ay

from

the

car w

ash

and

nois

e fro

m th

e dr

ive

thro

ugh.

Par

tially

uph

old.

M

atte

rs r

aise

d sh

ould

be

ad

dres

sed

at

the

deve

lopm

ent

stag

e bu

t th

e is

sues

ca

n be

re

info

rced

by

be

ing

spec

ified

as

is

sues

fo

r co

nsid

erat

ion

on l

odge

men

t of

an

y pr

opos

al.

1.

Am

endm

ent

has

been

in

itiat

ed b

y th

e ap

plic

ant,

not

the

Cou

ncil.

2.

Not

ed.

The

Sch

eme

Amen

dmen

t an

d de

velo

pmen

t ap

plic

atio

n pr

oces

ses

are

sepa

rate

. Is

co

rrec

t in

not

ing

that

if

the

A46

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

4.

Will

Cou

ncil

put u

p a

buffe

r fe

nce

high

er th

an th

e ex

istin

g to

pre

vent

und

esira

bles

from

cl

imbi

ng o

ver?

5.

Pre

viou

sly

rais

ed c

once

rn

over

war

m w

ater

and

the

thre

at o

f Leg

ionn

aire

s di

seas

e –

7 ca

ses

in

Mel

bour

ne.

6.

W

ould

Cou

ncill

ors

like

this

to

go a

head

if th

ey w

ere

neig

hbou

rs?

7.

E

nter

tain

ing

area

and

be

droo

ms

whe

re y

oung

gr

andc

hild

ren

slee

p ar

e in

ar

ea n

ear p

ropo

sed

car w

ash,

w

hich

will

add

to e

xist

ing

nois

e le

vels

/ w

ater

spr

ay e

tc.

8.

E

xist

ing

car w

ash

less

than

40

0m a

way

and

see

s no

nee

d fo

r ano

ther

in th

e vi

cini

ty.

9.

C

ounc

illors

sho

uld

have

a

hear

t and

say

no

to p

ropo

sed

car w

ash.

Amen

dmen

t is

en

dors

ed,

the

uses

the

mse

lves

wou

ld

be

perm

itted

, su

bjec

t to

co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

othe

r de

velo

pmen

t sta

ndar

ds.

3.

Ap

plic

ant

has

advi

sed

that

th

e in

tend

ed w

ash

unit

has

auto

mat

ed d

oors

at

entry

/

exit

whi

ch m

ust

be c

lose

d fo

r un

it to

ope

rate

. W

ill be

co

nsid

ered

fu

rther

at

D

A

stag

e.

4.

The

Cou

ncil

will

not

erec

t a

fenc

e. T

his

is t

o be

agr

eed

to

betw

een

affe

cted

la

ndow

ners

in

ac

cord

ance

w

ith

the

Div

idin

g Fe

nces

A

ct.

5.

Not

ed. I

nfor

mat

ion

from

ap

plic

ant i

s th

at a

ny

prop

osed

car

was

h is

in

tend

ed to

be

cold

wat

er

was

h on

ly. N

o ca

ses

of

Legi

onna

ire’s

dis

ease

in W

A

asso

ciat

ed w

ith c

ar w

ashe

s.

Typi

cally

ass

ocia

ted

with

air-

cond

ition

ing

units

, soi

l /

potti

ng m

ixes

and

mor

e hu

mid

clim

ates

. To

be

man

aged

by

busi

ness

op

erat

or in

acc

orda

nce

with

H

ealth

Reg

ulat

ions

.

6.

The

Am

endm

ent h

as b

een

A47

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

initi

ated

on

plan

ning

gr

ound

s.

7.

C

omm

ents

not

ed. N

oise

is

requ

ired

to c

ompl

y w

ith E

P

(Noi

se) R

egul

atio

ns. R

efer

al

so to

Poi

nt 3

. Noi

se im

pact

w

ill b

e co

nsid

ered

furth

er a

t D

A s

tage

.

8.

The

car

was

h ac

ross

th

e ro

ad i

s a

self-

oper

ated

car

w

ash.

Th

e pr

opos

ed

car

was

h is

aut

omat

ic.

Prov

ides

ch

oice

. C

ompe

ting

busi

ness

is

no

t a

plan

ning

co

nsid

erat

ion.

9.

C

ounc

il w

ill m

ake

a de

cisi

on

on p

lann

ing

grou

nds.

4.

JJ &

KA

Rei

d 16

Car

bine

S

treet

, Asc

ot

16 C

arbi

ne S

treet

, A

scot

O

bjec

tion

1.

P

revi

ousl

y ob

ject

ed to

de

velo

pmen

t pro

posa

l and

ob

ject

ions

hav

e no

t cha

nged

.

2.

BP

has

had

little

rega

rd to

re

solv

ing

prob

lem

s ov

er th

e pa

st 1

0 ye

ars,

in p

artic

ular

in

rela

tion

to d

eliv

ery

of fu

el

(som

etim

es in

ear

ly h

ours

of

mor

ning

), w

hich

dis

rupt

s sl

eep.

3.

O

bjec

tion

is b

ased

on

Par

tially

uph

old.

M

atte

rs r

aise

d sh

ould

be

ad

dres

sed

at

the

deve

lopm

ent

stag

e bu

t th

e is

sues

ca

n be

re

info

rced

by

be

ing

spec

ified

as

is

sues

fo

r co

nsid

erat

ion

on l

odge

men

t of

an

y pr

opos

al.

1.

N

oted

. Th

e S

chem

e Am

endm

ent

and

deve

lopm

ent

appl

icat

ion

proc

esse

s ar

e se

para

te.

2.

Rel

ates

to

man

agem

ent

of

exis

ting

oper

atio

ns.

Not

a

A48

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

prob

lem

s as

soci

ated

with

24

/7 fu

el a

nd c

onve

nien

ce

stor

e, b

orde

ring

on

resi

dent

ial/s

tabl

ing

area

, w

hich

enc

roac

hes

on th

e qu

ality

of l

ife, p

artic

ular

ly:

• Lo

catio

n of

car

was

h w

ill ha

ve a

dire

ct im

pact

on

resi

dent

ial p

rope

rties

. •

Noi

se –

doo

rs o

n ca

r w

ash

will

not d

imin

ish

nois

e, e

spec

ially

giv

en

cars

que

uing

nea

rby

resi

denc

es.

• A

ntis

ocia

l beh

avio

ur (b

ad

lang

uage

, fig

htin

g,

syrin

ges

thro

wn

over

fe

nce,

car

ala

rms,

etc

). •

Vib

ratio

n fro

m tr

ucks

on

site

. •

Impa

ct o

n pr

oper

ty

valu

es.

• E

xist

ing

auto

mat

ed c

ar

was

h at

BP

Red

cliff

e an

d se

lf-op

erat

ed c

ar w

ash

acro

ss th

e ro

ad –

nei

ther

ha

ve im

pact

on

resi

dent

ial

prop

ertie

s.

• R

esum

ed la

nd fo

r Gre

at

Eas

tern

Hig

hway

w

iden

ing

will

mak

e ac

cess

to a

nd fr

om th

e si

te m

ore

prob

lem

atic

. D

oes

not b

elie

ve th

e tra

ffic

stud

y ac

cura

tely

de

tails

the

real

traf

fic

cons

ider

atio

n fo

r th

is

proc

ess.

3.

Con

cern

s no

ted.

•

Loca

tion

is b

ased

on

a de

velo

pmen

t co

ncep

t on

ly.

A fo

rmal

D

A

is

requ

ired

whi

ch

will

as

sess

im

pact

s on

ad

join

ing

resi

dent

ial

prop

ertie

s.

• N

oise

(c

urre

nt

and

futu

re)

is

requ

ired

to

com

ply

with

E

nviro

nmen

tal

Pro

tect

ion

(Noi

se)

Reg

ulat

ions

19

97.

The

nois

e im

pact

fro

m

addi

tiona

l de

velo

pmen

t on

si

te

will

be

dete

rmin

ed

at

deve

lopm

ent

appl

icat

ion

stag

e.

• N

ot a

lan

d us

e sp

ecifi

c m

atte

r. To

be

man

aged

by

in

divi

dual

bu

sine

ss

oper

ator

. •

Req

uire

d to

com

ply

with

E

nviro

nmen

tal

Hea

lth

Reg

ulat

ions

. •

Pro

perty

va

lues

no

t a

plan

ning

con

side

ratio

n.

• C

omm

ents

no

ted.

Im

pact

s on

ad

join

ing

resi

dent

ial

land

use

s to

be

fur

ther

con

side

red

at

A49

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

mov

emen

ts a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith th

e si

te.

• La

rge

impa

ct fo

r hor

ses

on a

djoi

ning

pro

perti

es –

ho

rses

are

hig

hly

stru

ng

anim

als

and

nois

e an

d vi

brat

ion

can

upse

t the

m

easi

ly.

4.

C

ar w

ash

and

deliv

ery

of fu

el

/ sto

ck s

houl

d be

bet

wee

n 7a

m a

nd 7

pm.

5.

C

onve

rsio

n of

ser

vice

are

a to

pl

ant r

oom

will

con

tribu

te to

ad

ditio

nal i

mpa

cts

on

adjo

inin

g re

side

nces

.

6.

Con

cern

BP

is u

sing

the

notif

icat

ion

on ti

tle o

f uni

ts to

th

e ga

in a

ppro

val,

and

that

it

is u

nrea

sona

ble

for B

P to

ar

gue

that

she

d on

adj

oini

ng

prop

erty

will

min

imis

e no

ise,

as

it w

as n

ot c

onst

ruct

ed b

y B

P, b

ut ra

ther

by

owne

rs to

as

sist

miti

gatin

g no

ise.

7.

Bel

ieve

s th

at th

ere

will

be

min

imal

invo

lvem

ent /

co

nsid

erat

ion

of im

pact

on

adjo

inin

g la

ndow

ners

in fu

ture

de

velo

pmen

t pro

posa

l.

8.

Bel

ieve

that

the

exte

nsio

ns

prop

osed

by

BP

will

not

DA

sta

ge.

• M

RW

A

has

prov

ided

co

mm

ents

on

th

is.

Con

side

ratio

n fo

r fo

rmal

de

velo

pmen

t app

licat

ion.

•

Not

ed,

as p

er d

ot p

oint

1.

4.

Not

ed.

To

be

cons

ider

ed

furth

er a

t DA

sta

ge.

5.

For

cons

ider

atio

n at

D

A

stag

e.

6.

N

otifi

catio

n on

C

T is

in

tend

ed

to

info

rm

land

owne

rs

of

pote

ntia

l am

enity

im

pact

. D

oes

not

take

aw

ay

requ

irem

ent

to

com

ply

with

de

velo

pmen

t st

anda

rds

unde

r a

form

al

DA

. 7.

An

y D

A

rece

ived

w

ill

be

adve

rtise

d to

af

fect

ed

land

owne

rs

in

acco

rdan

ce

with

TP

S re

quire

men

ts.

8.

Th

e A

men

dmen

t ha

s be

en

mad

e on

pla

nnin

g gr

ound

s.

A50

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

enha

nce

the

area

, but

mak

e it

an u

nten

able

situ

atio

n w

ith

adjo

inin

g re

side

ntia

l/sta

blin

g di

stric

t.

5.

C

A K

elly

6/

27 H

ardy

Roa

d,

Asc

ot

6/27

Har

dy R

oad,

Asc

ot

O

bjec

t

1.

Con

cern

s re

late

to th

e pr

opos

ed u

tility

/ se

rvic

e ar

ea.

2.

C

once

rned

that

due

to th

e he

ight

of f

ence

bet

wee

n af

fect

ed p

rope

rty a

nd u

tility

ar

ea, t

his

will

resu

lt in

vie

w,

smel

l and

ver

min

impa

cts

from

rubb

ish.

3.

If de

velo

pmen

t pro

ceed

s,

wou

ld li

ke to

rais

e th

e he

ight

of

the

fenc

e.

Dis

mis

s.

1.

The

Am

endm

ent

rela

tes

to

land

us

es,

rath

er

than

sp

ecifi

c de

velo

pmen

t co

ncep

t.

2.

As

ab

ove.

Th

is

is

to

be

addr

esse

d at

DA

sta

ge.

3.

Not

ed.

Sub

ject

to

co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

Cou

ncil

requ

irem

ents

.

6.

Mai

n R

oads

WA

P

O B

ox 6

202

Eas

t Per

th 6

892

(Ref

05/

2652

/02)

210

Gre

at E

aste

rn

Hig

hway

, Asc

ot

No

obje

ctio

n 1.

N

otes

tha

t a

porti

on o

f th

e su

bjec

t pr

oper

ty (

sepa

rate

to

the

MR

S

rese

rvat

ion)

is

re

quire

d fo

r “r

oad

purp

oses

” to

acc

omm

odat

e a

bus

lane

w

ith q

ueue

jum

ping

fac

ilitie

s du

ring

peak

ho

ur

perio

ds

alon

g G

EH

.

Not

ed.

Land

owne

r /

appl

ican

t is

aw

are

of t

he r

oad

wid

enin

g of

Gre

at

Eas

tern

Hig

hway

.

7.

Wat

er

Cor

pora

tion

PO

Box

100

Le

eder

ville

690

2 (R

ef J

T1 2

006

Gen

eral

N

o ob

ject

ion

1.

R

etic

ulat

ed w

ater

sup

ply

is

avai

labl

e.

2.

Not

ed.

This

A

men

dmen

t do

es

not

dire

ctly

pro

pose

any

cha

nges

to

serv

ices

or a

n y p

hysi

cal w

orks

.

A51

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

0935

9 VO

2)

3.

Any

requ

ired

exte

nsio

ns to

w

ater

mai

ns m

ust b

e w

ithin

ro

ad re

serv

es h

avin

g re

gard

to

Util

ity P

rovi

ders

Cod

e of

P

ract

ice.

4.

A

rea

can

be c

onne

cted

to

exis

ting

grav

ity s

ewer

ne

twor

k.

5.

An

exis

ting

sew

er e

asem

ent

exis

ts o

n no

rther

n bo

unda

ry,

and

any

deve

lopm

ent i

n th

is

area

will

requ

ire d

ue

cons

ider

atio

n.

6.

Wat

er s

trate

gy a

nd

man

agem

ent i

ssue

s sh

ould

be

add

ress

ed in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Sta

te W

ater

Stra

tegy

, S

tate

Wat

er P

lan,

and

Dep

t of

Wat

er B

ette

r Urb

an W

ater

M

anag

emen

t doc

umen

t. 7.

Fu

ndin

g is

bas

ed o

n ‘u

ser

pays

’ – d

evel

oper

to p

rovi

de

all w

ater

and

sew

er

retic

ulat

ion,

esp

ecia

lly n

ew

wor

ks.

Hea

dwor

ks

cont

ribut

ion

for w

ater

, sew

er

and

drai

nage

als

o ap

plic

able

. 8.

A

ny d

evel

opm

ent w

ill re

quire

W

ater

Cor

p B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s ap

prov

al a

nd w

ith p

rior

paym

ent o

f hea

dwor

ks.

Any

ph

ysic

al

wor

ks

and/

or

fee/

char

ges

requ

ired

in r

elat

ion

to

serv

ices

et

c w

ill

be

addr

esse

d at

an

y fu

ture

su

bdiv

isio

n an

d/or

DA

sta

ge.

A52

No .

Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss

Des

crip

tion

of

Affe

cted

Pro

pert

y,

Lot N

o., S

tree

t, et

c.

Res

ume

of S

ubm

issi

on

Cou

ncil

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Com

mis

sion

R

ecom

men

datio

n

9.

Info

rmat

ion

prov

ided

m

ay

chan

ge

and

Wat

er

Cor

p sh

ould

be

co

ntac

ted

if de

velo

pmen

t ha

s no

t pr

ocee

ded

with

in 6

mon

ths.

8.

W

este

rn P

ower

Lo

cked

Bag

252

0 P

erth

600

1

Gen

eral

N

o O

bjec

tions

1.

D

evel

oper

to

co

ntac

t P

erth

O

ne C

all

Ser

vice

and

obt

ain

loca

tion

deta

ils

of

Wes

tern

P

ower

un

derg

roun

d ca

blin

g ob

tain

ed

prio

r to

an

y ex

cava

tion

com

men

cing

.

2.

Wor

k S

afe

requ

irem

ents

mus

t al

so

be

obse

rved

w

hen

exca

vatio

n w

ork

is

bein

g un

derta

ken

in t

he v

icin

ity o

f an

y W

este

rn P

ower

ass

ets.

3.

A

ny

chan

ge

to

the

exis

ting

pow

er

syst

em

is

the

resp

onsi

bilit

y of

the

indi

vidu

al

deve

lope

r.

Not

ed.

This

A

men

dmen

t do

es

not

dire

ctly

pro

pose

any

cha

nges

to

serv

ices

or a

ny p

hysi

cal w

orks

. A

ny p

hysi

cal

wor

ks r

equi

red

in

rela

tion

to s

ervi

ces

etc

will

be

addr

esse

d at

an

y fu

ture

su

bdiv

isio

n an

d/or

DA

sta

ge.

9.

Wes

tnet

Ene

rgy

PO

Box

849

1

Per

th B

C 6

849

(Ref

LM

093

90)

Gen

eral

N

o O

bjec

tions

N

oted

.

A53



Item 12.1 refers

Attachment 3

Scheme Amendment 59 Independent Acoustic Report

A54

Noise Impact Assessment

Prepared For

City of Belmont

March 2010

Reference: 10031514-01

Automotive Vehicle Wash BP Ascot

Great Eastern Highway

GEORGE

LLOYD

Acoustics

A55

Report: 10031514-01

Lloyd George Acoustics Pty Ltd ABN: 79 125 812 544

PO Box 717 Hillarys WA 6923

Offices: Ocean Reef Padbury Scarborough Waterford

Phone: Fax:

Email: Mobile:

9300 4188 9300 4199 [email protected]

0439 032 844

9401 7770 9401 7770 [email protected]

0400 414 197

9245 3223 9300 4199 [email protected]

0438 201 071

9313 3655 9300 4199 [email protected]

0427 388 876

Member of the Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants – (AAAC)

Approved for Issue: Terry George

Position: Project Director

Verified Daniel Lloyd

Date: 30 March 2010

This report has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services described in the contract or agreement between Lloyd George Acoustics Pty Ltd and the Client. The report relies upon data, surveys, measurements and results taken at or under the particular times and conditions specified herein. Any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to the aforementioned circumstances and no greater reliance should be assumed or drawn by the Client. Furthermore, the report has been prepared solely for use by the Client, and Lloyd George Acoustics Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility for its use by other parties.

A56

Lloyd George Acoustics

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1

2 CRITERIA ........................................................................................................................ 1

3 CARWASH USAGE ......................................................................................................... 4

4 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 5

4.1 Site Measurements ................................................................................................... 5

4.2 Noise Modelling ........................................................................................................ 5

4.2.1 Meteorological Information ................................................................................ 5

4.2.2 Topographical Data ........................................................................................... 6

4.2.3 Ground Absorption ............................................................................................ 6

4.2.4 Sound Power Data ............................................................................................ 6

5 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 10

5.1 Background Noise Measurements ......................................................................... 10

5.2 Noise Modelling ...................................................................................................... 10

6 ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................................. 12

6.1 Existing Service Station .......................................................................................... 12

6.2 Existing Service Station with Car Wash ................................................................. 12

7 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 12

APPENDICES

A Site Plan

B Carwash Noise Measurements

C Vacuum Noise Measurements

D Tyre Pressurisation Noise Measurements

E Terminology

A57


Reference: 10031514-01 Page 1

1 INTRODUCTION

BP Australia Pty Ltd (BP) are proposing to refurbish an existing service station located at 210 (Lot 151) Great Eastern Highway in Ascot, on the corner of Resolution Drive – refer Figure 1.1 taken from the City of Belmont’s Local Planning Scheme No.14. The main area of interest of this report is the addition of an automotive vehicle wash, although analysis has also been undertaken of some existing noise sources.

Figure 1.1 –Locality Map

Noise from the facility has been assessed to the closest residences (refer Figure 1.1) against the prescribed standards of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.

Note that an acoustic assessment has already been undertaken by another consultant and submitted to the City of Belmont. However, the Council have requested an independent acoustic assessment to ensure compliance can be achieved.

Appendix E contains a description of some of the terminology used throughout this report.

2 CRITERIA

Environmental noise in Western Australia is governed by the Environmental Protection Act 1986, through the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 (the Regulations).

Regulation 7 defines the prescribed standard for noise emissions as follows:

“7. (1) Noise emitted from any premises or public place when received at other premises –

(a) Must not cause or significantly contribute to, a level of noise which exceeds the assigned level in respect of noise received at premises of that kind; and

Proposed Facility

R1 – 27 Hardey Rd

R4 – 249 GEH

R3 – 214 GEH

R2 – 16 Carbine St

A58



(b) Must be free of –

i. Tonality;

ii. Impulsiveness; and

iii. Modulation”.

A “…noise emission is taken to significantly contribute to a level of noise if the noise emission exceeds a value which is 5dB below the assigned level…”

Tonality, impulsiveness and modulation are defined in Regulation 9. Noise is to be taken to be free of these characteristics if:

(a) The characteristics cannot be reasonably and practicably removed by techniques other than attenuating the overall level of noise emission; and

(b) The noise emission complies with the standard after the adjustments of Table 2.1 are made to the noise emission as measured at the point of reception.

Table 2.1 – Adjustments For Intrusive Characteristics

Tonality Modulation Impulsiveness

+ 5dB + 5dB + 10dB

Note: The above are cumulative to a maximum of 15dB.

The baseline assigned levels (prescribed standards) are specified in Regulation 8 and are shown below in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2 – Baseline Assigned Noise Levels

Premises Receiving Noise Time Of Day

Assigned Level (dB)

LA10 LA1 LAmax

Noise Sensitive1

0700 to 1900 hours Monday to Saturday (Day)

45 + influencing

factor

55 + influencing

factor

65 + influencing

factor

0900 to 1900 hours Sunday and public holidays (Sunday)

40 + influencing

factor

50 + influencing

factor

65 + influencing

factor

1900 to 2200 hours all days (Evening)

40 + influencing

factor

50 + influencing

factor

55 + influencing

factor

2200 hours on any day to 0700 hours Monday to Saturday and 0900 hours Sunday and public holidays (Night)

35 + influencing

factor

45 + influencing

factor

55 + influencing

factor

Commercial All hours 60 75 80

1. Applies within 15metres of a building associated with a noise sensitive use, as defined in Schedule 1, Part C.

A59



The influencing factor has been calculated at each receiver location. Note that R3 is currently commercial and therefore has no influencing factor with allowable levels of 60 dB LA10, 75 dB LA1 and 80 dB LAmax. Table 2.3 shows the applicable influencing factor should the site be developed into residential.

Table 2.3 – Influencing Factor Calculation

Description Within 100 metre Radius

Within 450 metre Radius Total

R1 – 27 Hardey Road

Commercial Land 1.0 dB

21 %

1.3 dB

25 % 2 dB

Major Road 6 dB

GEH - 6 dB

Total 8 dB

R2 – 16 Carbine Street


22 %

1.3 dB

25 % 2 dB

Major Road 6 dB

GEH - 6 dB

Total 8 dB

R3 – 214 Great Eastern Highway (Assume Future Residential)


22 %

1.3 dB

25 % 2 dB

Major Road 6 dB

GEH - 6 dB

Total 8 dB

R4 – 249 Great Eastern Highway


47 %

1.3 dB

25 % 4 dB

Major Road 6 dB

GEH - 6 dB

Total 10 dB

A60



With reference to Section 4, it has been determined that the most critical assigned noise levels are the LA10 on Sundays during the day and the LA1 during the night. The LAmax is also applicable for the intermittent audible alarm from the air pressurisation units used for tyre inflation.

Table 2.4 shows the critical assigned noise levels including the influencing factor at each of the assessment locations.

Table 2.4 – Assigned Noise Levels

Premises Receiving Noise

Assigned Level (dB)

Sunday Day LA10 Night LA1 Night LAmax

R1 48 53 63

R2 48 53 63

R3 60 (48) 75 (53) 80 (63)

R4 50 55 65

Numbers in brackets indicate assigned noise level if residential use.

3 CARWASH USAGE

From Table 2.2, it can be seen that for items that do not operate for more than 10% of the time, a higher allowable noise level is permissible. That is, if something generates noise for more than 1% but less than 10% of the time, the LA1 parameter is applicable. Similarly if something operates for less than 1% of the time, the LAmax parameter is applicable.

Information sourced for previous projects indicated that a car wash will be used 34.5% during the day on a Sunday and 3.2% of the night on a Sunday. All other days/times resulted in lower percentage uses and thus Sunday is the most critical. Note that vacuum usage is assumed to be equivalent with carwash usage.

Due to the relative low usage of the car wash at night, it is considered unlikely the vacuum units would operate simultaneously with the carwash and hence these are assessed independently. During the day or evening, it is considered possible that the carwash and vacuums will operate simultaneously.

Noise from the audible alarm associated with the air pressurisation device is present for only a short time, considered to be less than 1% and therefore the night LAmax parameter is applicable.

A61



4 METHODOLOGY

4.1 Site Measurements Long term monitoring has been undertaken at R4 as part of a different project. This monitoring involved the use of an ARL Type 316 noise data logger and was located 5 metres from Great Eastern Highway. The logger was programmed to record hourly LA1, LA10, LA90, and LAeq levels. The logger was field calibrated before and after the measurement session and found to be accurate to within +/- 1 dB. Lloyd George Acoustics also holds current laboratory calibration certificate for the loggers.

Hand held noise measurements were undertaken of the equipment (existing and proposed) on 25 March 2010. The proposed carwash was measured at BP Carlisle (corner of Orrong Road and Archer Street), whilst the vacuum and tyre pressurisation alarm were both measured at the Ascot side.

Measurements were undertaken in accordance with Regulations 19, 20, 22 and 23 and Schedule 4, specifically noting the following:

The sound level meter used was a Bruel & Kjaer Type 2260 (S/N: 2508199), which holds current laboratory certificates of calibration (Calibration Date 4 July 2007) available upon request and was field calibrated before and after the measurements and found to be within +/- 0.5 dB. This meter simultaneously records the slow and fast time weighted sound levels allowing relevant data to be collected. The microphone was fitted with a standard wind screen with winds being less than 5m/s;

The microphone was at least 1.2 metres above ground level and at least 3.0 metres from reflecting facades (other than the ground plane) and as such no adjustments have been applied for reflected noise;

4.2 Noise Modelling To determine the noise emissions from the automotive vehicle wash facility, the computer modelling programme SoundPlan 6.5 has been utilised. The programme was selected to use the CONCAWE algorithms, which requires the following input data:

Meteorological Information;

Topographical data;

Ground Absorption; and

Source sound power levels.

4.2.1 Meteorological Information

Meteorological information utilised is based on that specified in EPA Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors No.8 Environmental Noise draft, and are shown below in Table 4.1.

A62



Table 4.1 –Modelling Meteorological Conditions

Parameter Night (1900-0700) Day (0700-1900)

Temperature (oC) 15 20

Humidity (%) 50 50

Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4

Wind Direction* All All

Pasquil Stability Factor F E

* Note that the modelling package used allows for all wind directions to be modelled simultaneously.

Note that the above conditions approximate the typical worst-case for enhancement of sound propagation. The EPA policy is that compliance with the assigned noise levels needs to be demonstrated for 98% of the time, during the day and night periods, for the month of the year in which the worst-case weather conditions prevail. In most cases, the above conditions occur for more than 2% of the time and therefore must be satisfied.

At wind speeds greater than those shown above, sound propagation may be further enhanced, however background noise from the wind itself is likely to be elevated and dominate the ambient noise levels.

4.2.2 Topographical Data

Topographical data was based on file data, which is from the Department of Land Information (DLI). The contours are in 1-metre intervals and cover the noise sensitive premises of concern.

Buildings and perimeter fencing have also been included as these can provide barrier attenuation when located between a source and receiver, much the same as a hill.

4.2.3 Ground Absorption

Ground absorption varies from a value of 0 to 1, with 0 being for an acoustically reflective ground (e.g. water or bitumen) and 1 for acoustically absorbent ground (e.g. grass). The site itself is considered to be reflective so an absorption of 0.1 (10%) has been assumed, with the surrounding land assumed to be 0.65 (65%), representing a mixture of hard and soft.

4.2.4 Sound Power Data

Measurements were undertaken of the BP Carlisle carwash for a deluxe carwash and standard carwash. The noise levels were logged in 1-second intervals at 3-metres from the entry door. The entry and exit to the carwash are fitted with acoustic doors that close once the wash commences. The results of the noise logging are presented in Appendix B. The LA10 and LA1 noise levels from the carwash were then determined and converted to a sound power level. Note that the entry and exit doors are assumed to have the same sound power level as shown below in Table 4.2.

A63



During the day on a Sunday, the carwash may operate once every 15-minutes. Based on this usage, the calculated sound pressure level at 3-metres was 76 dB LA10, with negligible difference between the standard and deluxe wash cycles. During the night, the usage may be once every 2-hours. Based on this usage, the calculated sound pressure level at 3-metres was 77 dB LA1, again with negligible difference between the standard and deluxe wash cycles.

The vacuum and tyre pressurisation alarms were both measured at the existing Ascot site at 1-metre from each source with the logging results presented in Appendices C & D respectively.

The vacuum usage is assumed to be on a 1 for 1 basis with the car wash. As such, the calculated sound pressure level at 1-metre was 84 dB LA10 when assessed over a 15-minute period (e.g. daytime) and 84 dB LA1 when assessed over a 2-hour period (e.g. night-time).

The highest noise level recorded from the tyre pressurisation alarm was 81 dB LAmax at 1-metre.

Table 4.2 – Sound Power Levels Used in Modelling, dB(A)

Item One-Third Octave Band Centre Frequency (Hz)

dB(A) 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k

LA1 Noise Level

Vacuum 66 69 70 87 82 85 85 77 91

Auto Wash 70 80 81 84 87 87 83 69 93

LA10 Noise Level

Vacuum 58 65 72 87 82 83 85 77 91

Auto Wash 66 79 79 82 86 86 82 68 91

LAmax Noise Level

Air Pressure Alarm 89 89

A64



5 RESULTS

5.1 Background Noise Measurements Figure 5.1 shows the noise levels over an entire Sunday. The measurement location is at 5-metres from the edge of Great Eastern Highway and is therefore significantly influenced by road traffic. The lowest noise level is at 4am when road traffic is at a minimum, recording a noise level of 46 dB LA90. During the day, the noise level is continually around 60 dB LA90.

For every doubling of distance away from the road, a 3 dB reduction would be approximately applicable.

5.2 Noise Modelling Table 5.1 summarises the results of the calculations for the existing conditions.

Table 5.1 – Summary of Predicted Noise Levels: Existing Conditions

Scenario Assessment Location

R1 - Hardey R2 - Carbine R3 – 214 GEH R4 - 249 GEH

L10 Day (Vacuum Only) 44 48 48 43 – 46

L1 Night (Vacuum) 44 49 48 43 – 47

Lmax Night (Alarm) 42 45 44 46

Note: The range in noise level at R4 is for the ground and upper floors where there is a variation.

Table 5.2 summarises the results of the calculations with the addition of the carwash.

Table 5.2 – Summary of Predicted Noise Levels: Includes Proposed Carwash

Scenario Assessment Location

R1 - Hardey R2 - Carbine R3 – 214 GEH R4 - 249 GEH

L10 Day (Vacuum & Car Wash) 56 56 63 51

L1 Night (Car Wash) 56 56 64 52

L1 Night (Vacuum) 44 49 48 43 – 47

Lmax Night (Alarm) 42 45 44 46

Note: The range in noise level at R4 is for the ground and upper floors where there is a variation.

A65


30

40

50

60

70

80

901:

00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

SPL,

dB(

A)

Time

Figure 5.1 - Noise Monitoring: Sunday 30 November 2008L1 L10 Leq L90

A66



6 ASSESSMENT

Noise levels from each of the noise sources have the potential to contain intrusive characteristics, in particular tonality. However, if compliance is achieved, that is the noise levels from the service station is equal to the assigned noise levels, it is unlikely that any intrusive characteristics would be audible above background noise. As such, no penalty has been applied for intrusive characteristics.

6.1 Existing Service Station

Examining the existing scenario (Table 5.1), compliance is currently being achieved. The most critical location is R2, where the predicted noise level from the vacuum unit during the day is the same as the assigned noise level.

If location R3 was redeveloped for residential use, compliance would be achieved at ground level. However, the noise levels from the vacuum units are calculated to be 5 dB higher at an upper floor and would therefore exceed. This could however be readily overcome by considering this in the design of the residences. It is unlikely that a development would have balconies for instance facing the service station so external noise at an upper level is unlikely to a concern. Any windows facing the service station would likely be relatively small and thicker than standard glass to minimise the impact of road traffic noise.

6.2 Existing Service Station with Car Wash

With the addition of the car wash, noise levels are calculated to exceed the prescribed standards of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997, based on the car wash measured at BP Carlisle.

Noise levels from the vacuum and tyre pressurisation alarm comply by themselves, however the noise of the vacuum units does significantly contribute at some locations.

At R4, it is considered that compliance is achieved at all times, given the only exceedance is by 1 dB during the day.

At R1 and R2, the car wash is calculated to cause exceedances during the day and night, by up to 8 dB. Even at R3, a 3 dB exceedance is calculated during the day assuming this is a commercial property.

7 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the methodology and analysis described in this report, the proposed automotive carwash is calculated to exceed the Sunday LA10 day time assigned noise levels by up to 8 dB and the night-time LA1 assigned noise levels by up to 3 dB. It is therefore recommended that further noise controls be implemented than those currently proposed.

A67



In terms of the measured carwash in Carlisle, this did incorporate acoustic doors. Compared with file data for a typical car wash with no acoustic doors, the Carlisle carwash was around 7 dB less. This would relate to doors that have an Rw

1 rating of around 13. From file information, ratings of up to Rw 26 are available for car wash doors. To achieve compliance at R1 & R2, an Rw 26 door would be required to the carwash entry. This will result in noise from the carwash being 5 dB less than the assigned noise level, thereby allowing for the contribution of the vacuum unit should the two operate simultaneously during the day. An alternative would be to reduce the rating of the entry door to say Rw 21 and replace the vacuum units with quieter models. File data suggests models that are up to 15 dB quieter than those currently present are available. Note that whilst the adjoining lot is commercial, the exit door is less critical and would need to be improved by only 3 dB (i.e. an Rw 17 rated door).

A further alternative may be to relocate the carwash. From an acoustic perspective, the preferred location would be to be orientated parallel to Great Eastern Highway and on the south side of the parking area where the vacuums are located. This would need to be assessed in detail on its own merit if it is practicable from a traffic arrangement point of view.

Based on the proposed arrangement, the most practicable noise control options are considered to be:

1. Replace the existing vacuum units with quieter models; and

2. Upgrade the entry door to a minimum Rw 21 rated door; and

3. Upgrade the exit door to a minimum Rw 17 rated door.

Note that the above recommendations assume the adjoining property to the east remains as a commercial use. If this property were to be developed as single storey residential, noise levels are calculated to exceed by up to 15 dB. In this case, the following would be required:

1. Replace the existing vacuum units with quieter models; and

2. Install Rw 26 rated doors at both the entry and exit; and

3. Increase the height of the boundary wall from 1.8 metres to 2.1 metres.

If the neighbouring property were to be developed to multi-storey residential, noise levels at Level 1 would exceed by up to 19 dB. With the inclusion of Rw 26 rated acoustic doors, the exceedance would still be 6 dB and therefore the boundary wall would need to increase to 3.5 metres or Level 1 of the development would need to incorporate design features to minimise noise intrusion (e.g. no balconies facing service station, 10mm laminated glass to windows etc).

1 Rw is a single number value given to a material providing guidance on its sound insulation performance and measured in a laboratory under controlled conditions. It is determined by using the procedures documented in AS/NZS 1276 and AS 1191. The higher the number, the better the performance. Note it is very similar to the previously used STC (Sound Transmission Class) value. The only difference being a shift in frequency range where Rw is determined from the transmission loss at each one-third-octave band centre frequency between 100 Hz and 3.15kHz, STC was between 125 Hz and 4kHz. The two ratings are normally within 1 point of each other.

A68



If the neighbouring development was to be more than 2 storeys, a boundary wall of say 4 metres high (considered to be the maximum practicable) would not reduce noise levels. As such, floors above Level 1 would need to incorporate noise mitigation design features and the carwash would need the highest rated acoustic doors (Rw 26).

A69

attachments - city of belmont · no . name and address description of affected property, lot no.,...

Documents