armed robbery case study for vels. 2 sentencing advisory council, 2015 1. what is sentencing? what...
TRANSCRIPT
Armed robbery
Case study for VELS
2 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
1. What is sentencing?
What laws guidea judge when sentencing?
Pho
to: J
ohn
Fre
nch
/ Cou
rtes
y of
The
Age
Chief Justice Marilyn Warren of the Supreme Court of Victoria
3 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Who is responsible for sentencing?
In Australia, responsibility for sentencing is spread among
three groups
Parliament ~ makes the laws ~
Government~ puts laws into operation ~
Courts ~ interpret the laws ~
Creates offences and decides what the maximum penalties will be
Makes the rules that the courts must apply to cases
Sets up punishments for judges and magistrates to use
Apply the law within the framework set up by parliament
Set specific sentences for individual offenders
Correctional authorities (e.g. prisons) – control offenders after sentencing
Adult Parole Board – supervises offenders who are on parole
4 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Where is sentencing law found?
• Sentencing Act 1991
• Children, Youth and Families Act 2005
• Common law – previous court judgments
• Various Acts and Regulations creating particular offences, for example:
– Crimes Act 1958 deals with a range of crimes, including injury offences
– Road Safety Act 1986 deals with a range of driving offences, including drink driving and drug driving
5 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Types of sentences
Imprisonment
Drug treatment order
Community correction order
Fine
Adjourned undertaking
Most severe
Least severe
6 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
2. Sentencing theory
What must a judge consider when deciding what sentence to impose?
Source: Victorian Sentencing Manual, Judicial College of Victoria
7 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Purposes of sentencing
These are the ONLY purposes for which sentences can be given
Sentencing Act 1991 s 5(1)
PURPOSES OF SENTENCING
Community protection
Deterrence
RehabilitationDenunciation
Just punishment
8 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Principle of parsimony
Sentencing Act 1991 ss 5(3)(7)
Parsimony~ extreme care when imposing punishment ~
Where a choice of punishment exists,the judge should take care to choose
the least severe option that will achieve the purposes of sentencing
Example - If there is a choice between imposing a fineor a community correction order, a fine should be imposed
provided it meets the purposes of sentencing
9 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Factors that must be considered
Sentencing Act 1991 s 5(2)
Aggravating ormitigating
factors
Maximum penalty& current sentencingpractices
Type of offence& how serious
Circumstancesof the offender
Victim
Relevant Actsof Parliament
& previouscourt decisions
Factors making the crime worse, intention, effects, method, motive,
weapons,role the offender
played
Prior offences,age, character,& mental state.
Alcohol, drug, orgambling addiction.
Personal crisis, guilty plea
Impact of crimeon victim (e.g.psychological
or physicaltrauma), materialor financial loss
Factors thatincrease orlessen the
seriousnessof the crime
Victim ImpactStatement
Factors that must be consideredwhen sentencing
10 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Victim Impact Statements
• If a court finds a person guilty, a victim of the offence may make a Victim Impact Statement (VIS)
• A VIS contains details of any injury, loss, or damage suffered by the victim as a direct result of the offence
• A person who has made a VIS can request that it be read aloud during the sentencing hearing
11 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
How long is a sentence?
• Cumulative sentences for two or more crimes that run one after the other, e.g. two x five-year prison sentences served cumulatively = 10 years in prison
• Concurrent sentences for two or more crimes that run at the same time, e.g. two x five-year prison sentences served concurrently = five years in prison
• The total effective sentence (TES) (or head sentence) the total imprisonment sentence for all offences within a case, after orders making sentences cumulative or concurrent
12 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Non-parole period
Parole is the prisoner’s release from prison before the end of his or her total possible prison sentence, subject to conditions (e.g. regular reporting to a parole officer)
A non-parole period:• is set by the court• is the part of the sentence that must be served in prison• must be set by the court for sentences of two years or
more• may or may not be set for sentences of one to two years• is not set if the sentence is less than one year
13 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
3. The crime and the time
What isarmed robbery?
What is themaximum penalty?
14 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Armed robbery
A person is guilty of armed robbery if he or she commits any robbery and at the time has with him or her a firearm, imitation firearm, offensive weapon, explosive, or imitation explosive. A person guilty of armed robbery is guilty of an indictable offence
Maximum penalty
The maximum penalty for armed robbery is Level 2 imprisonment (maximum 25 years’ imprisonment) and/or a fine of 3,000 penalty units
Crimes Act 1958 s 75A(1)(2)
15 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Armed robbery people sentenced
16 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Armed robbery sentence types
17 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Age & gender of people sentenced
18 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Total effective sentence & non-parole period
19 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
4. The case
What are the facts of this case?
20 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
The offender
• Bradley Flint is 19 years old
• He was 18 at the time of the offence
• He has been found guilty of one count ofarmed robbery
21 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
The crime 1
• Bradley went into his local milkbar, took a can of soft drink from the fridge, and went to the counter
• He took a knife from his pocket, pointed it at the female shopkeeper, and said, ‘Money, quickly!’
• The shopkeeper took a $10 note from the cash register
• Bradley grabbed the $10 and ran from the store with the can of soft drink
22 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
The crime 2
• Bradley ran down a laneway near the store
• He hid the knife behind a wall
• He caught a bus home, using the $10 note to buy his bus ticket
• He was arrested soon after and taken to the local police station
• At the police station, he was charged with armed robbery
23 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
Factors for consideration
• Bradley was 18 when he committed the offence
• He pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity
• He has four prior juvenile convictions for theft,driving offences, and cannabis possession
• Bradley had an unstable home life. His parents separated when he was five years old
• He is a regular cannabis user, a habit he startedwhen he was 11 years old
• He left school after Year 11 and worked briefly as an apprentice bricklayer. He is now unemployed
24 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
5. The sentence
What sentence would you give?
Photo: Department of Justice & Regulation
25 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
You decide …
What sentence would you give?
• If imprisonment, what would be the total effective sentence and the non-parole period?
• If a community correction order, what would be the length of the order?
• If a fine, what would be the amount of the fine?
26 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
The maximum penalty
Armed robbery
• A person found guilty of armed robbery is liable to Level 2 imprisonment and/or fine
• Maximum 25 years and/or 3,000 penalty units
Crimes Act 1958 s 75A(1)(2)
Bradley Flint is guilty of one count of armed robbery and could receive:
• possible maximum imprisonment of 25 years
• possible maximum fine of 3,000 penalty units
27 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
What the judge decided
Bradley Flint’s case, County Court
• Two years community correction order
• Conditions– report to a community corrections worker for supervision
– attend treatment for alcohol and drug addiction
– complete 100 hours of unpaid community work
28 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015
6. Conclusion
Effective sentencing achieves a balance between the interests of society, the concerns of the victim, and the best interests of the offender
The more information society has about crimes and the people involved in them, the more reasonable it is in its demands about sentencing
Photo: Department of Justice & Regulation