1. The Mechanism of Annual Education System is an obstaclein the learning process of commerce students at Government College of Management Sciences Peshawar. NoorulhadiPhD Scholar at Islamia College University Peshawar. Lecturer at Govt College of Management sciences Peshawar.(nooruhadi99@yahoo.co) 00923219091220

2. IntroductionAnnual examination system is annually term of studywithout any break and this system was inherited fromBritish education system, London education systemestablished school and university as it aggression onHindo-Pak in 1857.After 1947 no change was made in education policy.Education commission of Pakistan, 19591972-80 education policy was constituted.1992 NTS was introduced, with distribution of internaland external marks1998 NTS, GRE, TOEFL used as instrument forscholarships2002, Semester system was initiated by many university. 3. Introduction (cont)2000-2010, Annual system was replaced in private sectors2004 Quaid-e-Azam college of management scienceuniversity of Peshawar replaced annual system.But still in 2013, Govt college of management sciences,Peshawar. Evaluates student using traditional way ofannual system.Traditional system started in 1857 still acceptable inCommerce and Management sciences colleges ofKhyberpukhtunkhuwa.That become obstacle in learning process of B.com andM.com Students. 4. Introduction(cont) Objective :Magnifying the iceberg problems faced by commercestudents as in Govt college of management sciencesPeshawar. 5. Literature Review Shirazi and Muhammad Jawad Haider ,(2004) describedmaximum examination systems, major focused on annualsystem with its historical backrong starting from 1857 to2004. Allah Nawaz at al (2009)mentioned main drawback ofAnnual system, absenteeism, Leakage ofpapers, Impersonation of students, high absenteeismExternal assistance during examination ,Smuggling ofunauthorized material specially in annual exam, Copyingfrom a nearby candidate setting in closerows, Intimidation, and Irregularities of supervisory staffby allocating more time to some students. 6. Literature review (cont) Asfandiar and Hashim (2012) compared annual withsemester system, absenteeism, presentation andassignments value learning process. Aggarwal suggested effective method for learningprocess which is not possible in current system. 7. Research Methodology Data Collection Methods Researchers used two main sources that is primary andsecondary source of data. Primary Data The main obstacle that were traced from literature review andbecome obstacles such as absenteeism, confidence building toolsetc in learning process of students in annual system can behighlighted with reliability, primary data tools was best option.primary data has been collected through Questionnaire Population = Govt college of management sciences, Peshawar Sample size = 60 students , 10 Non responses, 50 studentsresponses were analyzed 8. Research methodology. Research Instruments Questionnaire with close end questions.Interview:DDO Khalid khan Chairman of Computer DepartmentGCMS Peshawar.Lecturers and students of GCMS Peshawar. 9. Result and DiscussionDescriptive analysis.After collection of questionnaire, Ms excel of MS-officeassisted the researcher with easytabulation, calculation the result and used of Bar andPie chart gave a conceptual understanding over theresult. 10. Conclusion This research clearly demonstrates that there is significant impact of annual system on student learning process, Absenteeism in annual system disturbs lectures sequences and also causes less conceptual understanding, Secondly, less interest of students arise because of less academic and co- curriculum activities, that leads students cowardly and also cause communication gap between students and teachers, Assignment and presentation skill are completely ignore in annual system that cause less conceptual understanding and students feel the course work as burden, and students pay full attention at the end of annual days. 11. Recommendation Attendance should be valued and should beaggregated in final result. In colleges external examination must be replacedwith internal and continuous evaluation. Assignment and presentation must be integral part ofevaluation in annual system as well. Education Policy need to trained and authorizedTeachers for some internal marks in annual system. Conceptual methodology of learning must systemized. 12. Thanks for your attentionNOORULHADI, PhD scholar Islamia College university Peshawa. noorulhadi99@yahoo.com