annual linearity - gpg93 · annual linearity - gpg93 ... datalogging software for isocals, ......
TRANSCRIPT
Annual Linearity - GPG93
• Do a full acceptance on every calibrator annually? Or quick checks?
.
Annual Linearity - RSCH
• RSCH has 7 clinically used calibrators
• We also look after another 8 calibrators
• Makes annual linearity quite a chore !
(so we generally don’t do it.)
.
RSCH
.
GPG93 Methodology
• Should measure over full range
• From maximum used (200GBq radiopharmacy, 20GBq clinical)
• To 0.1 MBq (approx 10x background)
• GPG93 recommends
decaying source
• Take reading every
2 hours
• R2 will always be 1.000
• Needs further analysis
• Calculate difference from expected measurements
• Tolerance 1% (reference) or 5% (field)
.
GPG93 Methodology
• Cons:
• Needs a tonne of 99mTc (cost, finger doses)
• Not sensitive – deviations explained by systematic errors
• Difficult to commit/remember to do the readings
• Takes a week of occasional measurements
• Pros:
• Ticks the box
.
GPG93 Methodology
Automatic Logging – 20mins
• Logging data every
20 minutes
• 99Mo tail
• More complete dataset
.
• Sensible amount of data – 500 data points over 5 days.
• Red curve is after 99Mo correction
• Counting errors at low activities
• Sensitive to jumps / range changes
.
Automatic Logging – 20mins
Range Changes
• Fidelis and Capintecs have 3 sets of electronics to enable them to
accurately measure activities and be linear across a 10^8 range.
• Sometimes the 3 ranges don’t quite match up, and sometimes you get
increasing errors towards range changes
.
Range Changes
Fidelis and Capintec range changes
for decaying sources occur at around
~18.6pA and ~1860pA –
(Approx 15MBq and 1500 MBq 99mT) (actual point varies with load/impedance)
Range changes upwards occur at
currents a little higher than these so
there are no sweet spots with rapid
switching
(Although I did try to find one once)
Range Changes
Fidelis has built in linearity
correction which gives near
perfect range change handling
But can still get infinite errors
if you log every second!
</pedant>
Range steps down at ~18.6pA
Range steps up (!) at ~19.9pA
.
Would you fail this?
• Picking instantaneous readings every 20 minutes
• Strange behaviour from 8MBq to 4MBq
• Pass? Fail? Repeat?
.
• Averaging over every couple of minutes reduces counting errors
• More frequent sampling = more sensitive to faults
• Not the kind of test you want to repeat!
.
Automatic Logging – 1 second
Our Current Practice
• Acceptance
• We do a full decaying source with automatic data logging
• Annual checks
• Full decaying source but only when we have a trainee. (but we have about 15 calibrators and 2 or 3 trainees)
• Quicker/easier alternatives?
• What errors are we expecting to find?
.
Alternatives for Annual QC – 3 Sources
3 Source Method 10GBq, 1GBq and 10MBq
1. Measure the 3 sources at the start and end of the day
2. Calculate half life of each source. With the above activities, each source will cover one of the 3 ranges.
Pros:
• Low dose / cost / effort
• Over in one day.
• Analysis takes 2 seconds
Cons:
• Not very scientific (no graphs!)
• Not quite as sensitive even to large non-linearities
• 99Mo might affect low range
.
Alternatives for Annual QC - Calicheck
Involves calculating the attenuation factor of the sleeves and
multiplying a very small number by a very large factor.
Manual says make limits the mean of all corrected readings +-5% (!!!)
.
Calicheck Limits
Pros:
• Very quick – 10 minutes!
• More scientific – you get a nice graph.
Cons:
• Lead may get damaged
• Potential for calibrator damage
• Set costs <£650
Discussion
Method Time Materials needed
Number of measurements
Sensitivity to small
non-linearities
Sensitivity to large non-linearities
Automatic logging
1 week (downtime!)
200GBq 500 to 500,000
Very good Very good
GPG93 occasional measurements
1 week 200GBq 20 Poor Good
3 source method
1 day <20GBq 6 Very poor OK
Calicheck 10 mins Lead set <20GBq
12 Very poor Good
Discussion
1. Does anyone actually do annual linearity QC (as in... every year...)?
2. Has anyone had a calibrator pass acceptance but fail annual checks?
3. Any other methods in use that I have overlooked?
4. Datalogging software for Isocals, Veenstras, Atomlabs etc.
Alexander Smout
Medical Physicist
Practical Guidance