animals, society and culture lecture 12: anthropomorphism and animal tales 2012-13
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture outline
Anthropomorphism Children’s literature Literature and campaigns against
cruelty to animals
Making connections Anthropomorphism derives from human
capacity for ‘reflexive consciousness’ Makes possible the ‘incorporation of some
animals into the human social milieu’ (Serpell, 2005:124).
Enables humans ‘to participate in nonhuman lives not just as observers but as active social partners…. [and] … to bridge the conceptual and moral gulf that separates humans from other animals’ (Serpell, 2005:132)
Types of anthropomorphism
Allegorical Personification Superficial Explanatory Applied (Mullan and Marvin, 1999)
Controversial
anthropomorphism is very close to anthropocentrism – humans project own ways of behaving, thinking feeling because they see themselves as the centre of the universe (Tylor)
Can also be understood as the opposite – as emphasising continuity between humans and animals (Fudge)
Civilising process Children closer to nature than are adults The process of acculturation of children
likened to the process of human development from ‘savage’ to ‘civilised’
Children are ‘like’ animals –this animality has to be controlled, tamed, repressed through process of acculturation
Children and animals
Animals are as important as humans Relationships with them significant Know their likes and dislikes See them as individuals Embodiment and touch important
aspect of communicating with animals
Social positioning similar
Fairy stories
Civilising process Repression of animality Taught about morality Charles Perrault: ‘They all tend to
reveal the advantage in being honest, patient, prudent, industrious, obedient’
Original tale In facing the werewolf and temporarily
abandoning herself to him, the little girl sees the animal side of herself. She crosses the border between civilisation and wilderness, goes beyond the dividing line to face death in order to live. Her return home is a move forward as a whole person. She is a wo/man, self-aware, ready to integrate herself into society with awareness. (Zipes, 30)
Perrault’s tale ‘As every reader/viewer subconsciously knows,
Little Red Riding Hood is not really sent into the woods to visit grandma but to meet the wolf and to explore her own sexual cravings and social rules of conduct. Therefore, the most significant encounter is with the wolf because it is here that she acts upon her desire to indulge in sexual intercourse with the wolf, and most illustrations imply that she willingly makes a bargain with the wolf, or, in male terms, ‘she asks to be raped’ (Zipes, p.239, Don’t Bet on the Prince)
Animal autobiographies Develop an anti-cruelty message Invite the reader to experience life from
an animal’s perspective Children are addressed by these books
because they’re seen as effective agents in promoting
better treatment of animals they can learn lessons in good behaviour
from the behaviour of the animals and their owners
Slave narratives Same social positioning Autobiographical Part of campaign to change the law Testimonial as well as testimony Subjectivity created for animal
autobiographers often analogous to children, women, slaves, servants (Cosslett, 2006)
Realist element Class system Morality tale – exemplar of good
behaviour (both human and animal) Respects human and animal
hierarchies Relates to treatment of horses in real
world Communication by touch and tone of
voice
Anti-cruelty campaigns
Published in 1877 RSPCA endorsed several editions
of the book George Angell, founder of the
American Humane Society, ‘issued free copies to American cabmen with the subtitle ‘The Uncle Tom’s Cabin of the Horse’ (Kean, 79).
Summary Anthropomorphism enables emotional
connection between humans and animals Devalued in modernity because it’s associated
with emotion rather than reason, women/femininity rather than men/rationality, children rather than adults, nature rather than culture
Important in children’s literature and in literature opposing cruelty to animals
Re-emergence of anthropomorphism at end of 20th beginning of 21st century is significant as it suggests change in how human-animal relations are understood/experienced – post-modernity
References used Armstrong, P (2008) What animals mean in the fiction of modernity,
Routledge Cosslett, T (2006) Talking animals in British children’s fiction, 1786-1914,
Ashgate Crist, E (2000) Images of animals: anthropomorphism and animal mind,
Temple University Press DeMelo, M (2012) Animals and Society, Columbia University Press Greene, A (2008) Horses at work, Harvard University Press Keane, H (1998) Animal Rights, Reaktion Mullan, B and Marvin, G (1999) Zoo Culture, Univ. of Illinois Press Serpell, J (2005) ‘People in disguise: anthropomorphism and the human-
pet relationship’ in Daston, L and Mitman, G (eds) Thinking with animals, Columbia University Press
Tipper, R (2011) ‘A dog who I know quite well’: everyday relationships between children and animals in Children’s Geographies, 9 (2): 145-165
Tyler, T (2003) ‘If horses had hands’ in Society and Animals, 11 (3) Zipes, J (2006) Fairy tales and the art of subversion, 2nd edition,
Routledge Zipes, J (1986) Don’t bet on the prince, Gower