an analytical review of the literature on online learning communities

30
An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities By Stacey Alexander Education 6610, Memorial University For Dr. Elizabeth Murphy Friday, December 3 rd , 2010

Upload: stacey-alexander

Post on 21-Nov-2014

2.938 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

By Stacey AlexanderEducation 6610, Memorial University

For Dr. Elizabeth MurphyFriday, December 3rd, 2010

Page 2: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Introduction

“development of a sense of community among individuals in [computer supported collaborative learning] environments improves learning objectives in such environments”1

Page 3: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Included ExcludedPeer-reviewed journals Non-peer-reviewed journals

Educational technology journals

Journals unrelated to educational technology

Studies from 2004–2010 Studies older than 2004

Studies about social work

Studies about community colleges

Page 4: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Country StudyAustralia 1, 7Canada 2, 4, 5, 8, 12Denmark 11Finland 10Ireland 11Israel 14Taiwan 14Turkey 2UK 14USA 3, 6, 13

Page 5: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Page 6: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Purpose of Studies

Purpose of Study Applicable StudiesExamine learners’ community 1, 4, 5, 13

Follow a community of learners over a long period of time

4, 10, 12

Explore professional development in communities

3, 7, 12

Study communities of practice 2, 9, 11, 14

Look at online communities 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, 15

Examine delivery models in communities

6, 8, 11, 13

Page 7: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Participants

Participants StudyUndergraduate university students

15

Graduate university students 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15

Postgraduate university students

1, 3, 6, 10

Working teachers/online community members

3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13

Working non-teachers/online community members

9

Page 8: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Data Collection

Data Collection StudiesSurvey/questionnaire 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14Evaluation 13Online forum/message transcripts 2, 3, 6, 9, 10, 15Interview 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14Field notes 3Reflective journal 6Documentation 9Focus group 4Direct observation 6Meetings 9

Page 9: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Data Analysis

Page 10: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 11: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 12: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 13: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 14: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 15: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 16: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 17: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 18: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Findings

Page 19: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Role of Instructors

Page 20: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Sense of Community

Page 21: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Success Factors

Page 22: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Professional Practice

Page 23: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Unexpected Findings

Page 24: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Conclusion

Page 25: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Implications

Page 26: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Works CitedAbedin, B., Daneshgar, F., & D’Ambra, J. (2010). Underlying factors of sense of

community in asynchronous computer supported collaborative learning environments. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 585–596. Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no3/abedin_0910.pdf.

Akyol, Z., Garrison, D., & Ozden, M. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), pp. 65–83. Retrieved September 28, 2010, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/765/1463.

Carboni, L., & Riggsbee, J. (2007). “We needed support and it was out there:” Building an online learning community with cooperating teachers. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education (EJITE), 6, 109–122. Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume6/Carboni.pdf.

1.

2.

3.

Page 27: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Works CitedConrad, D. (2005). Building and maintaining community in cohort-based

online learning. Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 1–20. Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/78/59.

Conrad, D. (2008). From community to community of practice: Exploring the connection of online learners to informal learning in the workplace. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(1), 3–23. Retrieved September 19, 2010, from doi: 10.1080/08923640701713414.

Correia, A., & Davis, N. (2008). Intersecting communities of practice in distance education: The program team and the online course community. Distance Education, 29(3), 289–306. Retrieved September 18, 2010, from doi: 10.1080/01587910802395813.

4.

5.

6.

Page 28: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Works CitedDuncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online

communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324–340. Retrieved September 18, 2010, from doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x.

Guilar, J., & Loring, A. (2008). Dialogue and community in online learning: Lessons from Royal Roads University. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 19–40. Retrieved September 19, 2010, from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/52/714.

Kok, A (2010). Demystifying virtual communities of practice: A case study of IBM. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 11(3), 119–128. Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde39/pdf/article_5.pdf.

7.

8.

9.

Page 29: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Works CitedMylläri, J., Åhlberg, M., & Dillon, P. (2010). The dynamics of an online

knowledge building community: A 5-year longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 365–387. Retrieved September 29, 2010, from doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00972.x.

Ó Murchú, D., & Sorensen, E. (2004). Online master communities of practice: Collaborative learning in an intercultural perspective. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, Vol. 2004/I. Retrieved September 28, 2010, from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2004/Identifying_COPs.html.

Riverin, S., & Stacey, E. (2008). Sustaining an online community of practice: A case study. Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 43–58. Retrieved September 19, 2010, from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/3/533.

10.

11.

12.

Page 30: An Analytical Review of the Literature on Online Learning Communities

Rovai, A., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2). Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/192/795.

Shacham, M., & Od-Cohen, Y. (2009). Rethinking PhD learning incorporating communities of practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 279–292. Retrieved September 28, 2010, from doi: 10.1080/14703290903069019.

Yeh, Y. (2010). Analyzing online behaviors, roles, and learning communities via online discussions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 140–151. Retrieved October 23, 2010, from http://www.ifets.info/journals/13_1/14.pdf.

Works Cited13.

14.

15.