systemic approach to safety in texas · 2017. 1. 4. · systemic approach to safety in texas ......

Post on 13-Sep-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Systemic Approach to

Safety in Texas Srinivas Reddy Geedipally, PhD, PE

June 9, 2015

What is “Systemic Approach”?

Focuses on high-risk roadway features Selects low-cost effective countermeasures Reduces fatal/severe crashes in rural areas Also beneficial for crash types less likely clustered

in urban area.

An approach that focuses on roadway safety features to prevent high severe crashes

Severe crashes are widely distributed Few locations experience a high number of

sustained occurrences Crash locations are somewhat random Addresses crashes across the network

Why “Systemic Approach”?

Systemic Project Selection Tool

Systemic Widening Program

Rural 2-Lane – 2-Way Highway ADT ≥ 400 vehicles per day Less than 24 foot paved surface width Widening to a maximum paved surface width of 28 foot

CRITERIA

Systemic Widening Program

Head-On Single Vehicle Run Off Road

K & A Crashes

SVROR Crashes Single Vehicle

8439

Urban758 (11%)

Rural6030 (89%)

Overturned2485 (37%)

Fixed Object4138 (61%)

Tree, Shrub, Landscaping - 1090 (26%)Fence - 642 (16%)

Culvert-Headwall - 620 (15%)Guardrail - 302 (7%)

Embankment- 260 (6%)Ditch- 259 (6%)

Highway Sign - 224 (5%)Other Fixed Object - 193 (4%)

Utility Pole - 150 (4%)Mailbox - 148 (4%)Others - 250 (6%)

Fatal and Incapacitating Injury Crashes OnlyTwo-lane Two-way Highways

Source: TxDOT CRIS, 2009-2013

Other/Unknown165 (2%)

Minor Arterial - 342 (45%)Collector - 215 (28%)

Principal Arterial - 196 (26%)Others - 5 (1%)

Major Collector - 3327 (55%)Minor arterials - 1386 (23%)Minor Collector - 751 (12%)Principal Arterial - 557 (9%)

Local - 9 (1%)

Total Paved Width18-20: 1187 (20%)21-22: 487 (8%)

23-24: 927 (15%)25-26: 313 (5%)27-28: 483 (8%)29-30: 304 (5%)

31-40: 1142 (19%)>40: 1187 (20%)

On Roadway1651 (20%)

ROR6788 (80%)

Fatal - 2167 (26%)Incap. injury- 6272 (74%)

ADT0-399: 768 (13%)

400-999: 1277 (21%)1000-1999: 1432 (24%)2000-2999: 887 (15%)3000-3999: 554 (9%)4000-4999: 356 (6%)5000-5999: 250 (4%)6000-6999: 182 (3%)7000-7999: 99 (2%)8000-8999: 79 (1%)9000-9999: 46 (1%)>=10000: 100 (2%)

Head-on Crashes Head-on

2023

Fatal and Incapacitating Injury Crashes OnlyTwo-lane Two-way Highways

Source: TxDOT CRIS, 2009-2013

Minor Arterial - 160 (45%)Principal Arterial - 120 (34%)

Collector - 69 (19%)Others - 9 (2%)

Major Collector - 633 (38%)Minor arterials - 584 (35%)

Principal Arterial - 376 (23%)Minor Collector - 72 (4%)

ADT0-399: 37 (2%)

400-999: 113 (7%)1000-1999: 253 (15%)2000-2999: 282 (17%)3000-3999: 229 (14%)4000-4999: 199 (12%)5000-5999: 152 (9%)6000-6999: 141 (8%)7000-7999: 80 (5%)8000-8999: 62 (4%)9000-9999: 31 (2%)>=10000: 86 (5%)

Urban358 (18%)

Rural1665 (82%)

Fatal - 1015 (50%)Incap. injury- 1008 (50%)

Total Paved Width18-20: 139 (8%)21-22: 85 (5%)

23-24: 151 (9%)25-26: 43 (3%)

27-28: 121 (7%)29-30: 66 (4%)

31-40: 413 (25%)>40: 647 (39%)

Evaluate Risk Factors

Average Daily Traffic Highways are categorized into: Low volume: 400 < ADT <700 Moderate volume: 700 < ADT <1500 High volume: ADT > 1500

Evaluate Risk Factors Cross-sectional width

- Crash Total

- Crash Over-Representation

a) SVROR crashes b) Head-on crashes

60.7%

6.4%

32.8%

53.3%

6.6%

40.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

<=10+0 10+1 11+0

Perc

ent

Lane Width + Shoulder Width (ft)

LengthKA Crashes

60.7%

6.4%

32.8%

63.1%

7.1%

29.8%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

<=10+0 10+1 11+0

Perc

ent

Lane Width + Shoulder Width (ft)

LengthKA Crashes

Evaluate Risk Factors

Truck Volume a) SVROR crashes b) Head-on crashes

49.6%

32.9%

17.5%

56.2%

30.0%

13.8%

0.0%

15.0%

30.0%

45.0%

60.0%

75.0%

0-8% 9-15% >15%

Perc

ent

Truck Presence

Length

KA Crashes

49.6%

32.9%

17.5%

59.8%

18.9% 21.3%

0.0%

15.0%

30.0%

45.0%

60.0%

75.0%

0-8% 9-15% >15%

Perc

ent

Truck Presence

Length

KA Crashes

Evaluate Risk Factors

Alignment a) SVROR crashes b) Head-on crashes

3.7%

18.2%

78.1%

14.8% 22.1%

63.1%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Curve (R <1000ft) Curve (R >=1000ft) Straight

Perc

ent

Alignment

Length

KA Crashes3.7%

18.2%

78.1%

10.6% 19.0%

70.4%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Curve (R <1000ft) Curve (R >=1000ft) Straight

Perc

ent

Alignment

Length

KA Crashes

Evaluate Risk Factors

Risk Factor Weights Category

Weight (points)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Crash Total

≥0%

and

<10%

≥10

and

<20%

≥20

and

<30%

≥30

and

<40%

≥40

and

<50%

≥50

and

<60%

≥60

and

<70%

≥70

and

<80%

≥80

and

<90%

≥90

and

<100%

100%

Crash Over-

Representation 0%

>0%

and

<2%

≥2%

and

<3%

≥3%

and

<4%

≥4%

and

<5%

≥5%

and

<6%

≥6%

and

<7%

≥7%

and

<8%

≥8%

and

<9%

≥9%

and

<10%

≥10%

and

≤100%

Evaluate Risk Factors

SVROR Risk Factor

Weight (points)

Low Volume

(400≤ADT≤700)

Moderate

Volume

(700<ADT≤1,500)

High Volume

(ADT>1,500)

Lane & Shoulder

Width

10+0 7 8 8

10+1 0 1 1

11+0 6 2 2

Truck Percentage

≤8% 2 7 11

9-15% 10 3 3

>15% 3 2 1

Alignment

Curve (R

<1000ft) 8 8 7

Curve (R

≥1000ft) 1 3 2

Straight 7 6 7

Evaluate Risk Factors Head-on Risk Factor

Weight (points)

Low Volume

(400≤ADT≤700)

Moderate Volume

(700<ADT≤1,500)

High Volume

(ADT>1,500)

Lane & Shoulder

Width

10+0 7 6 5

10+1 4 2 1

11+0 2 6 11

Truck Percentage

≤8% 2 2 15

9-15% 4 6 1

>15% 6 2 5

Alignment

Curve (R

<1000ft) 12 11 11

Curve (R

≥1000ft) 1 2 5

Straight 6 6 6

Evaluate Risk Factors We now have Weight for SVROR (Ws) Weight for Head-on (Wh) Total Weight

𝑊𝑡 = 𝑊𝑠 + 𝑝 ∗ 𝐶 ∗ 𝑊ℎ Where • 𝑝= proportion of the number of head-on crashes with respect to

SVROR and • 𝐶 = proportion of the crash cost of head-on crashes with respect

to SVROR.

Evaluate Risk Factors

Combined Risk Factor

Weight (points)

Low Volume

(400≤ADT≤700)

Moderate

Volume

(700<ADT≤1,500)

High Volume

(ADT>1,500)

Lane & Shoulder

Width

≤10+0 8.93 9.66 9.38

10+1 1.10 1.55 1.28

11+0 6.55 3.66 5.04

Truck Presence

≤8% 2.55 7.55 15.14

9-15% 11.10 4.66 3.28

>15% 4.66 2.55 2.38

Alignment

Curve (R

<1000ft) 11.31 11.04 10.04

Curve (R

≥1000ft) 1.28 3.55 3.38

Straight 8.66 7.66 8.66

Practical Application

DFO = 1.68

DFO = 1.73

DFO = 1.76

DFO = 1.8

𝐿𝑐 = 0.03 mi

𝐿𝑡1 = 0.05 mi

𝐿𝑡2 = 0.04 mi Highway: BS0121D District: Paris County: Fayette DFO: 1.68 to 1.8 Total Length :0.12 miles ADT (in 2013): 516 vpd Truck %: 8.9 Lane Width: 10 ft Shoulder Width: 0 ft

R = 110 ft

Evaluate Risk Factors

Combined Risk Factor

Weight (points)

Low Volume

(400≤ADT≤700)

Moderate

Volume

(700<ADT≤1,500)

High Volume

(ADT>1,500)

Lane & Shoulder

Width

≤10+0 8.93 9.66 9.38

10+1 1.10 1.55 1.28

11+0 6.55 3.66 5.04

Truck Presence

≤8% 2.55 7.55 15.14

9-15% 11.10 4.66 3.28

>15% 4.66 2.55 2.38

Alignment

Curve (R

<1000ft) 11.31 11.04 10.04

Curve (R

≥1000ft) 1.28 3.55 3.38

Straight 8.66 7.66 8.66

Weight Calculations

Section Weight Curve (𝐿𝑐 = 0.03 mi) 𝑊𝑐 = 8.93+11.10+11.31

= 31.34 Tangent (𝐿𝑇 = 0.09 mi) 𝑊𝑇 = 8.93+11.10+8.66

= 28.69 Total (𝐿 = 0.12 mi) 𝑊 = 𝑊𝑐𝐿𝑐+𝑊𝑇𝐿𝑇

𝐿=29.35

Prioritize Locations

DI CO HWY ADT_CUR TRK_AADT FRM_DFO TO_DFO PAVED_WID length weight 1 75 BS0121D 516 8.9 1.68 1.8 20 0.12 29.35 1 75 BU0069B 1101 22.7 0.52 0.61 20 0.09 19.87 1 75 BU0069B 1101 22.7 0.61 0.96 20 0.35 19.87 1 194 BU0271D 1100 9 1.07 1.15 21 0.08 21.98 1 194 BU0271D 1100 9 1.64 1.65 20 0.01 13.87 1 92 BU0377B 2164 3.1 1.28 1.51 22 0.23 27.98 1 92 BU0377B 2164 3.1 1.51 4.29 22 2.78 28.41 1 92 BU0377B 2164 3.1 4.29 4.89 22 0.6 28.93 1 117 FM0006 2387 4.4 7.88 8.52 20 0.64 33.18

THANK YOU

top related