risposta sismica locale
Post on 16-Oct-2015
69 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
1/28
1
A . 4
ANALII DI IPOA IMICA LOCALE
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
2/28
2
INDICE
P 4
M 6
N 6
I 7
S
9
D 15
S 19
R 20
C 25
R 27
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
3/28
3
PEMEA
N
2009 P
G LA .
L F. 1.
F 1 0
,
L (
) (C II),
(
, , ). A
/.
L
(
), .
S NTC2008 P 3.2.2 : A
, .I ,
,
.
L (
,
) :
; ; L (
)
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
4/28
4
L
,
A.
/
50 II.
L
90 .
C (
)
( 1.5 ),
.
I
(1D)
EEA (J. P. B, K. I, C. H. L).
G , ,
(1D) .
I
, ,
(
A). I
S L U S V (SLV).
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
5/28
5
MEODO DI CALCOLO
L
EERA (E E R A)
U S C (D C E) J. P. BARDET, K.
ICHII, C. H. LIN.
T ,
, , 7.2.2 D.M. 14 2008:
( );
; ; .
NOME E IFEIMENI
D.M. 14 2008 C, G U. 29 4 2008 S. O . 30;
C 2 2009, . 617 " " .. 14 2008, G U . 47 26
2009 S. O . 27;
G MS (2008). .C R P A, D , R, 3 . D;
G L MSAQ (2010) .R A D P C, LA.
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
6/28
6
INDAGINI ED INFOMAIONI DI BAE
C P. 7.11.3 D.M. 14/01/2008,
, ,
,
, ,
.
A , (
2 ), :
. 1 (S1) 90.00 ; . 1 30 .
54 . (S2);
. 1 (S3) 30.00 ; . 2 V (SDMT)
64 S1 34,5 S2;
F 2 .
I F 3 S1
S. I
G0 D S SDMT1. I G 0
:
= 19 N/3 ( = 0.0 6.0 ); = 20 N/3 B A ( = 6.0 43.0 54.0 60.0 ); = 19 N/3 ( = 43.0 54.0 60.0 64.0 );
1
2
3
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
7/28
7
I
.
F 3 P , DM1.
I .
T 1 (G L MSAQ, 2010)
CERFIS (C R F
I S, U A) C ,
A
(A . 2010).
I
( ).
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
8/28
8
CELA DELLA CHEMAIAIONE GEOMEICA E DEFINIIONE DEL MODELLO
GEOECNICO DI OOOLO
I 1, N T
C 2008 (NTC08) 3.2.2
(NTC08, 7.11.3.3)
.
T ,
,
. I , 713 ...,
, , . R
. I,
.
L 350
A. T , C G ' 1(G L MSAQ, 2010)
F 4, CERFIS.
F 4 C G M ' M 1 (G L MAQ, 2010).
L H/V M S.
I F 5 M1S2, ' 1 (G L MSAQ, 2010) . D :
;
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
9/28
9
B A ( S1).
F 5 M12 M ' M 1 (G L MAQ, 2010). I
B A, D L .
I , , :
U 1 (UG1), : = 1.5 6.0 ; = 19 N/3; VS= 398 /;
U 2 (UG2), ( VS< 800 /):
= 6.0 11.0 ; = 19 N/3; VS= 620 /;
U 3 (UG3), ( VS< 800 /):
= 11.0 17.0 ; = 19 N/
3
; VS= 732 /; U 4 (UG4), (
VS> 800 /):
= 17.0 32.0 ; = 20 N/3; VS= 969 /;
U 5 (UG5), ( VS> 800 /):
= 32.0 42.0 ; = 20 N/3; VS= 1281 /;
U 6 (UG6), ( ): = 42.0 52.0 ; = 19 N/3; VS= 792 /;
U 7 (UG7), ( VS> 800 /):
= 52.0 58.0 ; = 20 N/3; VS= 1521 /;
U 8 (UG8), ( ):
= 52.0 66.0 ; = 20 N/3; VS= 938 /;
U 9 (UG9), ( ):( = 66.0 250.0 ); = 19 N/3; VS= 626778 /;
U 10 (UG10), ( ):( = 250.0 350.0 ); = 19 N/3; VS= 815848 /;
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
10/28
10
I
.
L VS SDMT 64
(UG1, UG2, UG3, UG4, UG5, UG6, UG7, UG8), UG8
( . 3) .
N VS
UG9 UG10,i C
(2001) C (1989), :
C (2001):= 300 0
0.27 2.44
0 = (+ 2)/3 , = 00
:
o 0 = ( );o = ( );o = ( );o 0= ;o = (%)
L () = 15%,
, L G D I C
A U F, S3C3, R P ( LA) P C.A.S.E. T
= 0.5;
C (1989):VS=
:
o , = ;o = .
I C (2001) C (1989)
CH (C C, 2010)
D S (A ., 2011) A,
.
P = 22 N/ 3
VS = 1250 /, CH
AQV ( O
LA), 50 (D C
. 2009).
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
11/28
11
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
12/28
12
I (
G/G0 D )
( ). S
' 1 (G L MSAQ, 2010),
. I
:
UG1: G/G0 D (M
G, 2010) (F 6);
F 6 G1:
G/G0 D.
UG2, UG3: G/G0 D (M G, 2010) (F 7);
F 7 G2/3 : G/G0
D.
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
DampingRatio(%)
G/Gmax
Shear Strain (%)
Shear Modulus
Damping Ratio
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
DampingRatio(%)
G/Gmax
Shear Strain (%)
Shear Modulus
Damping Ratio
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
13/28
13
UG4, UG5: G0 34453882 MP D 1%;
UG6: G/G0 D (RC) (TTS) 'U N
F II (S3C8) ,
50 , P C.A.S.E. R P, S
'A (G L MSAQ 2010) (F 8);
F 8 G6: G/G0
D.
UG7 : G0 34453882 MP D 1%; UG8: G/G0 D
(RC) (TTS) 'U NF II (S3C8) ,
50 , P C.A.S.E. R P, S
'A (G L MSAQ 2010) (F 9);
F 9 G8: G/G0
D.
UG9 : G/G0 D (RC) (TTS) 'U NF II (S3C8) ,
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
D
ampingRatio(%)
G/Gmax
Shear Strain (%)
Shear Modulus
Damping Ratio
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
DampingRatio(%)
G
/Gmax
Shear Strain (%)
Shear Modulus
Damping Ratio
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
14/28
14
50 , P C.A.S.E. R P, S
'A (G L MSAQ 2010) (F 10);
F 10 G4:
G/G0 D.
UG10 : UG7 ( , L 1997)
.
F 11 G10: G/G0
D.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
DampingRatio(%)
G/Gmax
Shear Strain (%)
Shear Modulus
Damping Ratio
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
DampingRatio(%)
G/Gmax
Shear Strain (%)
Shear Modulus
Damping Ratio
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
15/28
DEFINIIONE DELLE AI
N
. O ,
2008. L
:
3
(
3 ,
,
.
A
:
PGA 0.261(
I
12 13:
F 12
15
ONI IMICHE IN INGEO
,
,
. A
. I
7
(
)
);
()
,
,
)
10% 5
L;
DE1, DE2, DE3 (
,
,
NTC
,
S
(. A)
0
)
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
16/28
F 13
G
(
M : 6 < M : D (R): S : P (D): D (): > 20 ; PGA () : 0.15 < PGA () <
S
D (
.
: N
16
DE
)
(
://.../ESD/D/D
:
< 7;
;
R < 30 K;
A (V > 900 /);
D < 20 K;
0.35 (
(0.2 H < 25 H
A
). L
, G. L
T, S T, PGA0 PGA
1, DE2, DE3 (
://...)
.)
0.7 < F < 3);
)
.
,
(
. 2007)
, SA0(T)
(T)
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
17/28
,
G,
0.1.
G
. D
N D
1##K
P
K13/05/1995
2# C19/09/1979V N
3# A
UM
(2)26/09/1997
4# SI
23/11/1980
5##
DMM(: 271)
D01/10/1995
#= I , ##=ED
1
A
A E( N EI
F 14
17
. I
0.1 1 0,
D
(. A)
F M*,D**
P(K)
D()
N 6.4 14** 8 29
N 5.9 9.3* 6 25
N 6 21* 20 K 29
N 6.9 14* 15 KM 70
N 6.3 0** 20 K 27
(. A)
:
M2E);
( N);
( E);
M2E, N, E, DI
D
(
).
D.M 14/01/2008
LV.
C. PGA() D
NS 0.219 0.078
EW 0.204 0.059
NS 0.145 N
EW 0.202 N
NS 0.140 0.081
EW 0.188 0.055
NS 0.258 0.058
EW 0.36 0.035
NS 0.227 0.098
EW 0.355 0.055
L
:
NE ()
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
18/28
F 15
18
L)
(NCA
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
19/28
19
CELA DELLA POCEDA DI ANALII
S A (E
E R A) U S C J.P.
B 2000).I A A.
E
;
. I A
. I ,
. I
KV (
)
. N
;
. N
;
. I
.
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
20/28
20
ILAI
I
;
( : ,
; ,
;
; ; ;
F; ,
). N
(
).
I 6
( ).
D 16 :
0 0.6 H,
, ;
1 10 H UG1;
T .
F 16
L
I 17
SLV ( ):
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
21/28
21
-DET1, DET2, DET3:
S P (1996), M S
( MSAQ, 2010);
- STRNS , STREW : (I E, 1980)
SLV A T1 (
NTC 2008 );
- UM2EW: ( U M E, 1997) SLV
A T1 (
NTC 2008 );
I T 2 PGA (P G A) PGD
(P G D) 6 , .
APGA()
PGD()
DE1 0.30 5.70
DE2 0.29 4.90
DE3 0.28 6.8
E 0.25 10.7
N 0.30 13.00
M2E 0.30 5.70
2 PGA PGD 7 .
I 17
SLV ( ), ( ),
( )
( ). N 17 , ,
NTC 2008
B ( ) SLV:
- INVMAXSLV: DET1, DET2, DET3, STRNS, STREW, UM2EW;
- MEDIASLV: DET1, DET2, DET3, STRNS, STREW,
UM2EW;
- INVMAXNORMSLV: DET1, DET2,
DET3, STRNS, STREW, UM2EW
20% ;
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
22/28
22
- NTC(SLV)B: B T1 ( NTC 2008
);
F 17 .
L
NTC08 V30 V SDMT1
S1. D , 30
, :
30=717 /
B.
I 18
SLV ( ), (
) ( ).
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
23/28
23
F 18 .
L 7
(
). I
7
( ). S
.
I ,
B T1.
L , (0.2),
. I , ,
:
- ;- V 64
.
A.
L ,
,
(M . 2008) (
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
24/28
24
)
.
I ,
,
.
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
25/28
25
CONIDEAIONI FINALI
I DM 14/01/2008 P 3.2.5.1
, ,
,
, .
A
. L
.
D , ,
.
T
. N , , . G
,
. Q ,
,
P
. D ,
. Q
.
L , ,
. A
,
, . E
,
. S , , ;
, , . L
,
,
, , ( )
, .
P ,
.
L
( ).
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
26/28
26
O ,
.
I ,
,
,
( ) (
), .
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
27/28
27
IFEIMENI BIBLIOGAFICI
G MS (2008). I . C
R P A, D , R, 3 .
D
M. M, F. C (2008).A
, XII . 23
D 2008, T, I
T. C, J. F, C. M, G. S (2005). C
, T R, U
F
D M., G P., S F., S T., P B., V F., P L., A D., MP.(2009) A 6 A
2009.GNGTS 2009
J. P. B, K. I, C. H. L A (2000). C
A , U S
C, .
A A., D M F., D E F., M P., T, M.T B., T F.,
T G., C
A: ; 2010; R CERFIS,
D S, A T ,U S L
A.
C E., C M.,
A, C, 34; CERFIS
N 2010.
G. L, A. P.
( ) 1638 C .
E 2007
D.M. (2008) N T C. D.M. 14.01.2008 GU , 4 F 2008.
EERA(2000) //../GEES/S/EERA2000/D.
G T, F T, P M, M T, F D
M, G Z (2012)
'A S I C P
B D E G E (T, I)
-
5/26/2018 Risposta sismica locale
28/28
28
G L MSAQ (2010). M '
. R A D P C, L'A, 3 . C
.
G. M, A. G (2010). S
. P. V I. C. R A G
E E S D, S D, USA, P N. 1.28.
P M, G T, F T, S A (2011),
'A, ANIDIS (B,
I)
top related