research study "cse~work intensity~creativity"
Post on 03-Jun-2018
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
1/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY.
The interactive effect of core self-evaluation and tendency to work intenselyon creativity and performance
Donna George
Michelle Gomes
Ryan LambieAlex Martynov
Sara Pecorella
Zain SardarMuhammad Obaid Yaqub
Natalia Zaslavsky
HRM 4420 N WI14Dr. Amanda Shantz
April 2nd
, 2014
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
2/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 1Abstract
This paper investigates the equivocal relationship between core self-evaluations (CSE)
and creativity, and describes how and under what conditions this relationship is optimal for
organizations. We present a conceptual model of CSE and creativity that is moderated by
tendency to work intensely (TWI), and analyze the effect of creativity on four facets of
performance: organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), turnover intentions (TI), work
engagement (WE), and willingness to recommend the organization (WRO). Data gathered from
209 full-time employees revealed that CSE predicted creativity in the simultaneous presence of
high levels of tendency to work intensely (TWI) as a moderator. Conversely, CSE had an
opposite empirical association with creativity at low levels of TWI. Limitations, implications for
research, and practical implications are discussed.
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
3/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 2The role of personality variables in predicting performance has sparked the interest of
organizational psychologists for many years (Johnson, 2003). Firms interested in creating and
sustaining exceptional performance may be eager to inquire about variables that effectively
predict performance outcomes for which they aspire towards.
Core self-evaluation (CSE) is comprised of a set of fundamental self-beliefs regarding our
capacity to problem solve,worthiness of respect and regard, control of and responsibility for what
happens to us, and proneness to optimism and freedom from doubt (Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller,
2011). It may seem safe to assume those who possess this unique, trait-like CSE characteristic are
likely to exhibit higher levels of creativity because of their belief in the likelihood of success. In
support of this line of logic, Judge and Kammeyer-Mueller (2011) found that CSE was positively
associated with job attitudes (domain-specific and generalized self-efficacy) and that domain-
specific self-efficacy in particular was positively associated with creative behaviour (Judge &
Kammeyer-Mueller, 2011). Other research supports an opposite proposition. Silvia and Phillips
(2004) claimed that majority of the time, self-evaluation diminished creativity because of its
interference with the generation of new ideas (Silvia & Phillips, 2004).
The nature of the relationship between core self-evaluation (CSE) and creativity is
ambiguous. Streams of research have confirmed a substantial positive association between CSE
and creativity (Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2011)whereas others found a substantial opposite
association (Silvia & Phillips, 2004). Current research lacks empirical evidence that specifies
which conditions allow the relationship between CSE and creativity to be enhanced (strengthened
or dampened). Trait activation theory asserts that a traits presence is insufficient in determining
its predictive utility, and that personality variables may be either dormant or operational
depending on cuesprovided by the environment (Byrne, Stoner, Thompson & Hochwarter,
2005, p. 327). In terms of the current study, the CSE trait may remain latent unless its effect is
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
4/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 3activated by the situation of high TWI. The trait activation theory by Tett and his colleagues
serves as the theoretical foundation for our study (Tett & Burnett, 2003) in that it presents a
model of person-situation interaction specifying the conditions under which particular
personality traits will predict performance in particular jobs (Tett & Burnett, 2003, p. 507).
The goal of the current research study was not to address if CSE has any effect on
creativity, but rather under which circumstances does it affect creativity. Which conditions allow
for CSE and creativity to be positively related and which conditions allow for a negative
relationship? Given the importance of CSE, careful consideration of a moderating variable may
provide a more comprehensive understanding of the association between CSE and creativity. To
account for this ambiguity, we propose that the equivocal relationship between CSE and
creativity is influenced by the moderating variable of tendency to work intensely (TWI).
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
5/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 4Theoretical Background and Hypothesis
Literature Review
Core self-evaluation.The concept of CSE was initially developed to function as a
predictor of job satisfaction. CSE is a broad, latent, higher-order trait that is denoted by four traits
in the personality literature: self-esteem, the overall value that one places on oneself as a person;
(b)generalized self-efficacy, an evaluation of how well one can perform across a variety of
situations; (c) neuroticism, the tendency to have a negativistic cognitive/explanatory style and to
focus on negative aspects of the self; and (d) locus of control, beliefs about the causes of events
in ones life (Judge, Bono, & Thoresen, 2003, pp. 303-304). An individual with a high CSE
score is well adjusted, positive, self-confident, efficacious, and believes in his or her own
agency (Judge et al., 2003, p. 304). CSE is stable over the life-course with robust and consistent
effects across a variety of work domains (Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2011). These basic,
fundamental appraisals regarding worthiness, effectiveness, and capability comprise the deeper
level psychological construct of CSE (Judge et al., 2003).
The five-factor model of personality consists of extraversion, agreeableness,
conscientiousness, emotional stability (also called neuroticism), and openness to experience
(Byrne, Stoner, Thompson & Hochwarter, 2005, p. 327). The emotional stability (neuroticism)
trait is common to both the five-factor model and the CSE framework (Judge et al., 2003). The
conceptual overlap of emotional stability among both the five-factor model and the CSE
framework suggests that further examination of the CSE concept is warranted.
Creativity.The ferocity of todays competitive business environment requires
organizations to continuously seek methods to improve their products or services (Andriopoulos,
2001). Organizations interested in capitalizing on creativity view development of conditions that
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
6/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 5will foster creative conditions as long-term investment that starts from the individual and
disseminates throughout the organization (Andriopoulos, 2002).
Farmer, Tierney and Kung-McIntyre (2003) define creativity as the development of new
and practical ideas (Farmer, Tierney and Kung-McIntyre, 2003). This definition is paramount and
common to both Eastern and Western definitions of creativity and is central to the concepts use
in our study. The ability to create and execute novel and useful outcomes is facilitated by self-
confidence, belief that one is in control of implementation, and lack of doubt in the face of
uncertainty (Judge et al., 2011).
In the context of the competitive organizational environment, creation and application of
new ideas is crucial. Personality traits, self-perceptions and self-efficacy may influence creativity
(Diliello, Houghton, & Dawley, 2011). Research has highlighted the importance of establishing
necessary conditions for creative behaviours as well as the need for individual creative skills,
abilities, expertise, and creative self-efficacy (Diliello et al., 2011). Creativityexistsatthree
levels: the work team level, the supervisory level and the organizational level (Diliello et al.,
2011). At the work team level, creativity is enhanced when team members are open to new and
challenging ideas, can effectively communicate these ideas, and successfully manage conflict and
feedback (Diliello et al., 2011). Organizations should facilitate creative work environments so
that new and practical ideas are encouraged (Diliello et al., 2011).
Core self-evaluation and creativity. In examining CSE and creativity, there is lack of
clear empirical evidence that indicates whether CSE is either positively or negatively associated
with creativity. Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller (2011) demonstrated the demand for individuals
who are confident in their own abilities and who believe they can control their own fates (Judge
et al., 2011). People with a positive CSE viewed themselves positively across different situations,
and approached the world with confidence. According to self-verification theory, people with
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
7/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 6high CSE take on jobs that are perceived as challenging and rewarding as they believe they will
succeed in these roles (Judge et al., 2011). They discovered a positive relation between CSE and
job attitudes (domain-specific self-efficacy and generalized self-efficacy), and established a
correlation between domain-specific self-efficacy as a correlate of creative behaviour at work.
This lends support to CSEs positiveassociation to creative work performance (Judge et al.,
2011). Zhang & Bartol (2010) found that psychological empowerment was positively associated
to both intrinsic motivation (IM) and creative process engagement (CPE) (Zhang & Bartol,
2010). IM and CPE were both positively related to creative behaviours. An aspect of
psychological empowerment, competence, is referred to as self-efficacy in the CSE literature.
This conceptual overlap lends further support to CSEs positive associationwith creativity.
A negative association between CSE and creativity has also been shown to exist. Silvia
and Phillips (2004) sought to identify the nature of the effects of CSE on creativity and claimed
that majority of the time, self-evaluation diminished creativity (Silvia & Phillips, 2004). Self-
evaluation could possibly decrease creativity because it interfered with the critical thinking
process, when an individual usually generated new ideas (Silvia & Phillips, 2004). First, when
self-evaluation is accompanied with the feeling of an inability to succeed, it is thought to be
negatively associated with creativity. Second when individuals thought they were able to
improve, this resulted in a positive trend between self-evaluation and creativity. The authors
research challenged the hypothesis that the relationship between CSE and creativity is
unquestionably positive.
Tendency to work intensely as a moderator.Work effort is the quantity of resources
expended on the job (Yeo & Neal, 2004). Brown and Leighs (1996) conceptualization of effort
consists of three components: duration (or time commitment), intensity (or force), and direction
(Brown & Leigh, 1996, p. 361) with a focus on the time commitment and intensity dimensions
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
8/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 7which constitute the essence of working hard (Brown & Leigh, 1996, p. 361). Scales of effort
(including time commitment and work intensity) measure tendencies to work long (time
commitment) and hard (intensity) in order to achieve success (Brown et al., 1996). Thus, TWI, a
component of effort, refers to the amount of time and force expended on the job.
Byrne, Stoner, Thompson and Hochwarter (2005) indicate using a three-way interaction
between conscientiousness, effort, and psychological climate in a study of 139 restaurant
employees, that the relationship between conscientiousness and performance is moderated by
work effort (Byrne, Stoner, Thompson & Hochwarter, 2005). The study found a strong positive
relationship between conscientiousness and performance in the high work effortpositive
psychological climate subgroup (Byrneet al, 2005, p. 334).Conversely, they found non-
significant relationships for the low work effortpositive psychological climate groups (Byrne
et al, 2005, p. 334). Conscientiousness is one of the five key traits in the five-factor model (FFM)
of personality. Along with conscientiousness, neuroticism (emotional stability) is also part of the
FFM. When conscientiousness is combined with high levels of expended effort (a component of
effort is work intensity), performance is an outcome (Byrne et al., 2005). Emotional stability is a
dimension of the FFM as well as a central element of the CSE composition. This begs the
question of whether the enhanced conscientiousnessperformance relationship in the presence
of the moderating variable of work effort can be similarly applied to the CSEcreative
performance relationship with work intensity as a moderator. The dual-presence of emotional
stability in the FFM and the CSE composition is a stepping stone to discovering whether or not a
similar enhancing relationship exists with CSE and creativity.
Hypothesis 1a: There is an interaction between core self-evaluation and TWI, such that the
relationship between core self-evaluation and creativity is positive at high levels of TWI.
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
9/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 8We expect that the effect of CSE will work in the opposite direction at low levels of work
intensity. This essentially means that when levels of CSE are high (similar to the above case) but
tendency to work intensely is low, the opposite outcome occurs. That is, our model predicts a
negative association between CSE and creativity at low levels of TWI.
Hypothesis 1b: There is an interaction between core self-evaluation and TWI, such that the
relationship between CSE and creativity is negative at low levels of TWI.
Creativity and organizational citizenship behaviour. Lee and Allen (2002) describe
organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) as employee behaviour that is not necessarily critical
to the job, but facilitates organizational functioning (Lee & Allen, 2002). Examples of OCB
include attending non-mandatory corporate functions as well as assisting coworkers without
instruction to do so. Although OCB is not supported by organizational rules or reward systems, it
contributes positively to organizational effectiveness (Ryan, 2002). Discretionary helping
behaviours are framed by the context inwhichthis behaviour occurs (Dewett & Denisi, 2007).
OCB can result in employees working overtime and providing innovative solutions to
organizational problems because they are willing to perform tasks that go above and beyond their
basic duties (Xerri & Brunetto, 2013). Furthermore, affective commitment was found to have
been positively associated with an increase in the level of OCB and innovation (Xerri et al.,
2013).
Despite Xerri et al.s(2013) findings, there is a lack of empirical research to support the
relationship between OCB and creativity. We hypothesize a positive relationship between
creativity and OCB. This encompasses OCB directed towards individuals and OCB directed
towards the organization.
Hypothesis 2a: Creativity is positively related to organizational citizenship behaviour
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
10/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 9Creativity and turnover intentions. Turnover intentions are ones intention to quit. It is
the likelihood that a person will leave his/her job within the foreseeable future (Shalley, Gilson,
& Blum, 2000). Negative perceptions of the job can be associated with TI which raises concerns
regarding both substantive monetary and psychological dimensions of an organization. TIs are a
reflection of the organizational context (culture). A positive work context is comprised of ethical
values and creativity synergies. This tends to result in increased job satisfaction and decreased
turnover intentions (Valentine, Godkin, & Fleischman, 2011). Although some workplaces are
more efficient in creative settings, other workplaces may not respond similarly. Some jobs
require low creativity, and creative jobholders may become frustrated and less satisfied. The key
is complementarity between the work environment and creative job requirements; when there is
greater complementarity, the effect on turnover intentions will decrease (Shalley et al., 2000).
Turnover intention is a facet of employee behaviour that can partially depend on creativity
levels. The hospitality industry has a significant amount of turnover culture and it oftentimes
encompasses poor perceived working conditions relative to pay and temporal and seasonally
challenging nature of the work. Such conditions tend to hold true in the cookery occupation of
this industry, where combinations of extrinsic motivators (working conditions and pay) are the
catalysts to (dis)satisfaction along with occupational-specific intrinsic motivators which impact
chefs job satisfaction(Robinson & Beesley, 2010) . Occupational-specific intrinsic needs
contribute to higher order human needs (i.e. self-respect and achievement). Creativity is therefore
a defining element of the chef occupational culture (Robinson et al., 2010).
Based on the aforementioned research, we hypothesize that creativity and turnover
intentions are negatively related. This means that as creativity increases, the likelihood that an
individual will leave their job within the foreseeable future will decrease.
Hypothesis 2b: Creativity is negatively related to turnover intentions
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
11/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 10Creativity and work engagement.Organizations typically desire enthusiastic and
dedicated employees who are proactive and demonstrate initiative. Work engagement (WE) is
a positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind characterized by vigor, dedication, and
absorption (Schaufeli, Bakker, Salanova, 2006, p. 702). Vigor refers to high levels of energy and
mental resilience while working. Dedication refers to being strongly involved in ones work and
experiencing a sense of significance, enthusiasm, and challenge. Absorption refers to being fully
concentrated and happily engrossed in ones work, whereby time passes quickly and one has
difficulties with detaching oneself from work (Schaufeli et al., 2006).WE allows firms to
understand how vigorous, dedicated, and absorbed employees are in their work. Engaged workers
are more proactive, take more initiative, feel more positively about the organization and their
own ability, set higher goals, are more enthusiastic about their work, and exhibit less absenteeism
and burnout compared to non-engaged workers (Christian, Garza & Slaughter, 2011).
Research has demonstrated a positive relationship between WE and creativity as engaged
employees experience positive emotions on the job, which results in increases in their
productivity (Christian et al., 2011). When employees are engaged, they show an interest in the
work that is being performed as they are willing to invest themselves in their work. These
individuals will most likely exert themselves to the fullest. This can be explained by an openness
to experiment and create novel and useful ideas and processes. Thus, it is possible that creativity
is more likely to be an outcome. Research has also shown that WE may be a key to performance
(Rich, Lepine & Crawford, 2010). When individuals exert effort on the job, they also may
experience higher levels of task performance. This is possible because when workers demonstrate
positive and constructive behaviour, they could also be displaying behaviours that signal
openness to develop new and practical ideas.
Hypothesis 2c: Creativity is positively related to work engagement
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
12/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 11Creativity and willingness to recommend the organization. In much of the current
literature, willingness to recommend the organization (WRO) is considered a positive
organizational outcome. Its importance is attributed to the fact that employee referral is
commonly regarded as the single most effective recruitment method (Breaugh, 2008). WRO
helps the organization identify top talent (Ruiz-Palomino, Martnez-Caas, & Fontrodona, 2013).
Cable and Judge (1996) define WRO asa variable related to personal satisfaction (Cable &Judge, 1996). When satisfied with his or her job, employees may recommend their organization
to friends, relatives, and colleagues(Cable et al., 1996).Cable et al. (1996) also examinedpotential determinants of new employees and job seekers person to organization fit (P-O) and
the significance of person to job fit perceptions in job decision making. They determined that
individuals P-O fit perceptions significantly predict an individuals WRO (Cable et al., 1996).
Consequently, solely looking at management culture interventions on the larger scale is not
enough. Interventions for the individual are important to take into consideration as well.
Ruiz-Palomino et al. (2013) provides insight into how WRO can be measured for research
purposes. The relationship between organizational culture and positive organizational outcomes
(including WRO) were examined. This study demonstrates organizational culture is related to
outcomes such as WRO. More specifically the study shows ethical culture is positively related to
both P-O fit and WRO, and that P-O fit partially mediates the positive relationship between
ethical culture and WRO (Ruiz-Palomino et al., 2013).
We hypothesize a positive relationship between creativity and WRO. If a positive
relationship between creativity and WRO is found, this may suggest practical benefits to
promoting creativity within the organizational culture.
Hypothesis 2d: Creativity is positively related to willingness to recommend the organization
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
13/33
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
14/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 13requested to fill out the questionnaire in private, put it in a sealed envelope. The response rate
was 100%, meaning that each participant has completed the survey.
Measures
Participants rated their own CSE, TWI, creativity, WE, OCB, TI, and WRO using a
seven-point Likert scale that ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). Some of
the items were reverse-phrased and were reversed without any logical changes made to the
responses. Internal consistencies (Cronbachs alpha) and the number of items in the measuring
scale are displayed in Table 1 and all of them are acceptable.
Core self-evaluation. CSE is an independent variable in the model. CSE was measured
using a scale developed by Judge, Bono and Thoresen (2003). A sample item is: I am confident
I get the success I deserve in life.
Tendency to work intensely. TWI is a moderator variable within the model. TWI was
measured using a scale developed by Brown and Leigh (1996). A sample item is: When theres
a job to be done, I devote all my energy to getting it done.
Creativity.Creativity is a dependent variable in our model. Creativity was measuredusing a scale developed by Farmer, Tierney and Kung-McIntyre (2003). A sample item is: I try
new ideas or methods first before using established methods or ideas.
Organizational citizenship behaviour. Two types of organizational citizenship
behaviour (OCB) were included: individual and organizationalOCB. Both types were measured
using a scale developed by Lee and Allen (2002). A sample item for individual OCB is:
Willingly gave your time to help others who had work-related problems. A sample item for
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
15/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 14organizational OCB is: Attended functions that were not required but that helped the
organizational image.
Willingness to recommend the organization. WRO was measured using a scale with
one of the items being reversed-scored developed by Cable and Judge (1996). A sample item is:
How likely would you be to recommend your organization to your friends as a good place to
work?.
Work engagement. WE was measured using a scale developed by Schaufeli, Bakker and
Salanova (2006). A sample item is: When I get up in the morning, I feel like going to work.
Turnover Intentions.TI was measured using a scale developed by Boroff and Lewin
(1997). A sample item is: I try new ideas or methods first before using established methods or
ideas.
Control Variables. We control for age and working hours. Age was selected as a control
variable to eliminate its effect on our dependent variable of creativity, as previous studies showed
that age has a large effect on creativity (Binnewies, Ohly and Niessen 2008, pp. 438-457).
Working hours was selected as a control variable, because it was closely related to TWI. As we
wanted to test the exact effect of TWI on creativity, we decided to control for number of working
hours, so it would not affect the overall model.
Results
Descriptive Statistics
Table 2 reports descriptive statistics and correlations among all study variables. Bivariate
correlations were in the expected direction. In particular, we can state that creativity does not
have significant correlation with CSE. However, it is positively related to OCB, WE and WRO.
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
16/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 15Our Hypotheses 2a, 2c and 2d proposed that creativity is positively related to OCB, WE and
WRO. As Table 2 reveals, creativity does, in fact, have a significant positive relationship with
these three variables. However, hypothesis 2b, which proposed that creativity was negatively
related to TI, is not supported by the correlation results. The coefficient is negative (-0.04) but
this relationship is not significant at 95% confidence level (p=0.59). Thus, hypotheses 2a, 2c and
2d were supported by the data, while hypothesis 2b was not supported. Due to these four
hypotheses testing the importance of creativity to the organization, we can state that three out of
four hypotheses were supported by the results. Age and working hours are the control variables.
Age is not related to CSE or creativity, however the relationship between age and tendency to
work intensely is statistically significant and shows that the older a person is, the more intense he
will work. Also, despite that working hours, another control variable, is correlated with TWI, the
coefficient of correlation is only 0.20, which represents a small to medium relationship between
the variables. This suggests that these two concepts are not the same.
Regression Model
We tested hypotheses 1a and 1b using hierarchical regression analyses. In the first step,
we entered the control variables (age and working hours). In the second step, we entered the
standardized moderator variable (tendency to work intensely) and predictor (CSE). The
interaction term was entered in the third step. The regression model results of all three models are
summarized in Table 3. If we look at the adjusted R2we can state that 7.3% of the variation of the
dependent variable (creativity) can be explained by our model. Durbin-Watson coefficient is
close to 2 (1.628), which means that the assumptions of the independent errors has not been
violated. Significant F change and R2between model 1, 2, 3 tell us that the model with interaction
effect between CSE and tendency to work intensely fits the data better than without it. It shows,
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
17/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 16as expected, that model 3 is significant at 5% significance level (p = 0.03) and that tendency to
work intensely is a moderator for CSE and creativity. Beta coefficients of the model 3 predicting
creativity level are plotted in figure 2, showing the relationship between creativity and CSE for
low and high levels of tendency to work intensely. Hypothesis 1a and 1b proposed that there is an
interaction between CSE and tendency to work intensely, such that the relationship between CSE
and creativity is positive at high levels of TWI and negative at low levels of TWI. Both
hypotheses were supported by our model and are clearly demonstrated in figure 2.
Unstandardized beta coefficients in model 3 predict the creativity score using 2 control
variables, predictor, moderator, and interaction effect. As we can find out from table 4, age and
working hours are not significant at 5% significance level and their betas do not affect creativity
(-0.01 and -0.01). Creativity score can be predicted using the formula: Creativity = 4.7 + 0.05 *
CSE score + 0.29 * Tendency to work intensely score + 0.19 * Interaction effect. As we can see
on figure 2, both hypotheses 1a and 1b were supported, as creativity level tends to decrease for
high level of CSE accompanied with low level of tendency to work intensely, and to increase for
high level of CSE and high level of tendency to work intensely. Overall model is significant at
5% significance level. However, we have run the regression without the control variables
included and it was not significant at 5% level (p = 0.57). Possible reasons for this phenomenon
will be discussed more closely in discussion section.
Discussion
The results from our study have expanded the understanding of the relationship between
CSEs and creativity. Our results supported some of the current research that suggests a positive
relationship between creativity and CSEs, and have also provided explanation for why other
academic theories support an opposite relationship. Our results suggested that in order to
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
18/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 17maximize the creativity of an individual who has high CSE, the individual would also have to
possess TWI. On the other hand, when an individual exhibits low levels of TWI there is an
opposite effect. Our results supported Judge et al.s(2011) theory that domain specific self-
efficacy is positively associated with creativity. However, it extended the theory to suggest that
high TWI needs to be present in order for this positive association to exist. Thus, our results may
have provided an explanation on why Siliva et al. (2004) claimed that CSE interfered with
creativity, because their study did not include TWI. Our results have added to the current research
on the relationship between creativity and CSE and have extended it to include the situational
variable TWI, hoping to bring further clarity to the relationship.
Not only do our results support research surrounding these performance variables, but we
lend support to trait activation theory. High CSE alone cannot sufficiently predict creativity, but
when cues from the environment (i.e. requirement to work intensely) are present, then personality
variables (i.e. CSE) are more likely to have predictive utility (Byrne et al., 2005). This is just one
application of our results to trait-activation theory, and would require further research that
specifically studied our formula against trait-activation theory in order to determine if there is
definitive support. Our results support research suggesting that support on the three levels of the
organization has a positive relationship on self-efficacy and self-perceived creativity. We suggest
that TWI at the individual, work team, and organizational level, would be required to maximize
creativity across these levels (Diliello et al., 2011).
Our research also examined the relationship between creativity and other performance
outcomes. Our results and area of focus only examined if a significant relationship existed
amongst these four outcomes, and did not go further to examine situational variables to determine
if there is a potential for moderation or mediation among these relationships. Our results
supported the hypothesized positive relationship between creativity and OCB, WRO, and work
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
19/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 18engagement, but did not support the hypothesized negative relationship between creativity and
turnover intentions.
Although these relationships were only studied on a basic level, there are some theoretical
implications. In support of research on organizational culture and performance outcomes, our
results suggested that by supporting a culture that promotes creativity, there is an increased
chance that individuals within that organization are likely to recommend the organization to
others as a positive place to work (Ruiz-Palomino et al., 2013). Our results supported the research
by Christian et al. (2011) arguing that creativity and work engagement are positively associated.
Practical implications
There are several practical implications of our study for HRM practitioners, and would
benefit managers who are seeking to obtain specific performance outcomes. The implications of
our research can be applied across different functions of an organization, from recruitment and
selection to training and development, to job design, and performance appraisal. Our results
centered on maximizing creativity, the practical application is that our formula stands as a
reference for management whose interest is to maximize creativity within the organization,
starting with the individual.
From a recruitment and selection standpoint, management is looking to hire those who
possess qualities that will potentially result in creativity. Our formula supports the notion to hire
individuals who not only have creative qualities, but also have both strong CSE trait and high
TWI. Our formula suggests that management would also want to use training and development
interventions that develop these qualities within the individual to maximize creativity.
From a job design perspective, our results suggested that management should be looking
to design tasks that would initiate the individual to work intensely on the tasks at hand, for
example providing tasks to the individual that are challenging and stimulate creative thinking.
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
20/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 19This application also applies to trait activation theory in that CSEs alone does not predict
creativity but when management introduces tasks that stimulate the individual to work intensely,
creativity is more likely to be maximized.
For performance appraisals the concept is the same. Both intrinsically and extrinsically
rewarding employees who display TWI, and also providing workshops and technical training
allows employees to recognize and improve these facets. Our results have given management a
formula to apply to their recruitment, job design, development, and appraisal strategies that will
help maximize creativity within individuals.
As far as our results that showed positive associations of performance outcomes; WRO,
work engagement and OCB, with creativity, the practical implications are less significant. It
would require more in depth testing of the positive relationships to apply our results to
management strategies. Nonetheless we can make limited suggestions to management, informing
them that individuals who are more creative are more likely to be more engaged at work,
recommend the organization, and demonstrate OCB. Also, creativity does not have a significant
impact on employee TI. The importance for management here is that these performance
outcomes are desired (except for TI), so management may want to engage in, and provide
activities that support creativity within organizational culture in order to improve the likelihood
of obtaining desired performance outcomes.
Limitations
Our study had some limitations that bring forth further research. First, the sample size
used in this study was not of significant size, at only 209 participants. This suggests that a larger
sample size may potentially produce more varied results and thus change the results of our study.
In future studies, a larger sample size is suggested to produce more varied results which can be
easily generalized towards a larger population.
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
21/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 20Second, the composition of the participants may not have been a true random sample of
participants as studies request, thus the group of participants may not have been as differentiated
as expected. Since university students selected the participants, this may have led to a pool of
participants that are quite similar and those individuals may have been precisely selected, which
suggests that the sample studied may not have been random. This limitation may have affected
the findings of the study and suggests that the results of the study may not be replicated or
generalizable when tested on an alternate group of participants or on a larger population. In future
studies, it is suggested to use a proper method to randomly select participants for studies in order
to successfully produce generalized results that can be easily reproduced on a larger population.
Third, our conceptual model excluded in measuring some variables and controls. These
excluded variables may influence our conceptual model, and thus alter our results in such a way
that it produces new associations between variables. If these omitted variables were included in
our conceptual model, more significant and stronger associations could have been found, such as
moderators or mediators of the relationship between CSE and creativity. Our findings could have
potentially altered slightly or even immensely if we had included these omitted variables. As for
omitted controls variables, this may cause biased results and may alter our findings. In future
studies, it is suggested to include more variables in the study in order to eliminate or include
specific variables in the theoretical conceptual model.
The last limitation of our study concerns the restrictions of our cross-sectional study. Our
study was cross-sectional, in that it studies a group of participants where each participant
completes a survey at a single point in time (Rindfleisch, Malter, Ganesan, & Moorman, 2008).
Thus, our cross-sectional study fails to provide causal relationships between variables and also
leads to common method variance, which is due to using a single rater survey method, resulting
in systematic method error (Rindfleisch et al., 2008). Thus, our cross-sectional study limits the
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
22/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 21results to conclude that there are associations between variables, such that tendency to work
intensely moderates the association between CSE and creativity, creativity is associated with
OCB, WRO and WE, and creativity is not associated with TI. The absence of causality between
variables and common method variance leads to questioning the validity of the results of our
study (Rindfleisch et al., 2008). Additionally, common method variance may have potentially
inflated the associations between the variables studied. In order to ensure validity of our study it
is suggested that future studies utilize a longitudinal study rather than a cross-sectional study, to
combat the lack of causality and common method variance (Rindfleisch et al., 2008).
Future Research
Future research is suggested to provide additional support for our conceptual model. First,
a noteworthy point is that our conceptual model is not significant at 95% confidence level
without the control variables of age and working hours. As noted, control variables were included
in our conceptual model for theoretical reasons, as previous studies have shown that age affects
creativity (Binnewies, Ohly and Niessen 2008), and working hours is closely related to TWI.
This allowed us to omit alternate explanations for the moderation effect of TWI on the
relationship between CSE and creativity. The reasons as to why the model is not significant if the
control variables are not included in the analysis, suggests that age and working hours may in fact
moderate the relationship between CSE and creativity. Further research is advised to study why
the moderation effect of the relationship between CSE and creativity is not significant when the
control variables of age and working hours are omitted from the measures.
Second, as noted earlier, it is also fascinating for future research to compare the results of
this study to a similarly replicated study, whereas the sample size is larger and more diverse. This
of interest because it will produce generalized results that are capable of being replicated by a
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
23/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 22larger population. This will further the validity of our findings and encourage wide acceptance of
our conceptual model.
Third, future research should involve further testing the conceptual model utilizing a
longitudinal study in place of the current cross-sectional study. A longitudinal study studies a
group of participants over a period of time, and thus provides a sequence of events, which can
reveal causal relationships (Rindfleisch et al., 2008). This research should be conducted because
it will provide additional validity of and confidence in our conceptual model, because it may
reveal causality between the variables in our study, and it will slightly combat common method
variance (Rindfleisch et al., 2008).
Fourth, it is of interest for future research to study a potential mediation or moderation
effect of creativity among the relationship between CSE and the specified performance outcomes
in our conceptual model. A literature review is suggested in order to select whether creativity is a
moderator or mediator in this setting. The purpose of this future research is to further enhance our
conceptual model.
Conclusion
Creativity is a brilliant way for organizations to sustain a competitive advantage in
todaysbusiness environment. Although it may seem natural to assume that individuals who
think more positively about themselves also have the confidence to step outside of the box, some
research suggests that under different circumstances, these individuals are less creative (Silvia et
al., 2004). Our study lends support to the theory of trait activation through the assertion that the
mere presence of CSE is insufficient in determining its predictive utility.
The aim of our study was to address the ambiguous nature of the relationship between
CSE and creativity, and found that the relationship changes depending on the interaction between
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
24/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 23CSE and TWI, such that individuals who think positively about themselves and also tend to work
more intensely are more creative, and individuals who think positively about themselves but do
not tend to work more intensely are less creative. In other words, for individuals who tend to
work more intensely, as CSE increases, the more creative they are likely to be, whereas for
individuals who tend not to work as intensely, as CSE increases, the less creative they are likely
to be. Thus, the relationship between CSE and creativity is strengthened at high levels of TWI
and dampened at low levels of TWI.
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
25/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 24References
Andriopoulos, C. (2001). Determinants of organisational creativity: A literature review.
Management Decision, 39(10), 834-841.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job
performance: a metaanalysis.Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of
sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting.Journal of Applied
Psychology, 78(5), 715.
Behling, O., & Starke, F. A. (1973). The postulates of expectancy theory.Academy of
Management Journal, 16(3), 373-388.
Breaugh, J. A. (2008). Employee recruitment: Current knowledge and important areas for future
research.Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 103-118.
Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to
job involvement, effort, and performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358-
368.
Byrne, Z. S., Stoner, J., Thompson, K. R., & Hochwarter, W. (2005). The interactive effects of
conscientiousness, work effort, and psychological climate on job performance.Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 326-338.
Cable, D.M. & Judge, T.A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decision, and
organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3),
294-311.
Christian, M.S., Garza, A.S., & Slaughter, J.E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review
and test of its relations with task and contextual performance.Personnel Psychology,
64(1), 89-136.
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
26/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 25Dewett, T., & Denisi, A. S. (2007). What motivates organizational citizenship behaviours?
Exploring the role of regulatory focus theory.European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 16(3), 241-260.
Diliello, T. C., Houghton, J. D., & Dawley, D. (2011). Narrowing the creativity gap: The
moderating effects of perceived support for creativity. The Journal of Psychology, 145(3),
151-172.
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An
application of role identity theory.Academy Of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630.
Hilal, H. M. H., Husin, W. N. I. W., & Zayed, T. M. (2013). Barriers to creativity among
students of selected universities in Malaysia.International Journal of Applied Science
and Technology, 3(1), 51-60.
Johnson, J. W. (2003). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between personality
and individual job performance.Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of
personality in organizations, 83-120.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J.E., & Thoresen, C.J. (2003). The core self-evaluation scale: Development
of a measure.Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303-331.
Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-
analytic review.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797.
Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2011). Implications of core self-evaluations for a
changing organizational context.Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 331-341.
Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-
evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future
research.Human Performance, 17(3), 325-346.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
27/33
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
28/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 27Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job
performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517.
Tett, R. P., & Gutterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-
situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation.Journal of Research in
Personality, 34(4), 397-423.
Valentine, S., Godkin, L., Fleischman, G. M., & Kidwell, R. (2011). Corporate Ethical Values,
Group Creativity, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: The Impact of Work Context
on Work Response.Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 353-372.
Xerri, M. J. & Brunetto, Y. (2013). Fostering innovative behaviour: the importance of employee
commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. The International Journal of
Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3163-3177.
Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance effects
of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2),
231-247.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity:
The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process
engagement.Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
29/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 28TABLES AND FIGURES
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
30/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 29
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
31/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 30
Table 3. Hierarchical linear regression model with creativity as dependent variable
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
32/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 31
Figure 1. Conceptual model
-
8/12/2019 Research study "CSE~Work Intensity~Creativity"
33/33
CORE SELF-EVALUATION, TENDENCY TO WORK INTENSELY, CREATIVITY. 32
top related