hrdq insight newsletter - october 2013
Post on 04-Jun-2018
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
1/12
HRDQ Insight Newsletter
In this issue...
Are Time Robbers Stealing Your Productivity?
Building a Trust-Based Culture
Taking Control of Conflict
How the Negotiating Style ProfileHelped More than 600
Managers and Directors to Strengthen Their Negotiating
Skills
Trainer Education Series - Free Webinars
Are Time Robbers Stealing YourProductivity?
Your to-do list is a mile long, everything is labeled high priority, and the
expectations are high. Time robbers. They steal from you each and every
day, leaving you overwhelmed, frustrated, and spinning your wheels. And
guess what? You may be the culprit. Thats right, what derails you most is
oftentimes self-imposed. Take a look at this lineup. How many do you
recognizeand how can you stop the crime against productivity?
Procrastination
Putting things off leads to costly mistakes, poor results, and other issues that require you to spend even more
time on the task at hand. Whether youve developed a bad habit, youre dreading the project or youre afraid of
failing, understanding why you procrastinate is the best way to get a jumpstart.
Multi-tasking
You know youve tried it, and some people believe its what keeps them on track. But research shows doing
more than one thing at a time actually slows you down and reduces the quality of your work. Learn to recognize
when youre trying to tackle more than one thing at a time. Before you know it, youll discover you can
accomplish more by doing less.
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
2/12
Doing things more than once
How often do you begin a task, put it down, and then pick it up againback at square one? Fits and starts take
a huge toll on productivity. Thats why its important to assess the urgency, schedule the work, and assign a
deadline. Youll be amazed at what prioritizing your to-do list can do for you.
An outdated to-do list
Todays work environment is dynamic. That means your to-do list is ever changing too. So make it a regular
practice to review your to-do list often. Youre likely to find priorities have shifted, tasks need to be added, and
some projects can be eliminated altogether.
Distractions
Instant messaging. Chitchatting. Unsolicited phone calls. Is your productivity interrupted more often than youd
like to admit? Its ok, but take control. Unless you must be immediately available, put down the cell phone, turn
off your IM alerts, and allow calls to go to voicemail. It can wait.
Perfectionism
You rewrite, reorganize, and reformat. And then you do it again. Are you guilty of perfectionism? Stop, put down
the red pen, and think. Does the finished product already achieve expectations? You may just realize that good
enough really is good enough.
Inefficient use of technology
Be honest: How often do you find yourself surfing the Web, posting updates on social media, and responding to
email? Take an IT escape. Schedule time to do these activities when it doesnt impact your productivity. And cut
down the noise by unsubscribing to lists and feeds that no longer interest you.
Meetings, meetings, and more meetings
Are you being held hostage in the conference room? Meetings are essential to collaboration and getting thingsdone. But they can be a huge waste of time too. Before you respond to the next meeting request, ask the
organizer for an agenda. You may find your participation isnt critical. And if youre the one leading the meeting,
be mindful to stay on track and be respectful of others time.
You cant turn a 24-hour day into a 28-hour day. But you can create more time by reducing or eliminating time
robbers, whether the culprit is procrastination, multi-tasking, distraction, or perfection. Maybe youll even find
the free time to try that great new restaurant, pick up a new reador get some sleep.
Source:Balancing Priorities: How to Successfully Manage Tasks, Deadlines, and Expectations
https://www.hrdqstore.com/Balancing-Priorities_p_2939.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/Balancing-Priorities_p_2939.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/Balancing-Priorities_p_2939.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/Balancing-Priorities_p_2939.html -
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
3/12
Building a Trust-Based Culture
Trust. Its the ultimate efficiency and productivity tool. Its also the secret
to gaining a strategic advantage over the competition. But cultivating a
trust-based culture can seem like a daunting taskand some OD
professionals argue it cant be trained. We recently spoke with Laurie
Ribble Libove, organizational development specialist and author ofTrust:
The Ultimate Testabout the benefits of building a trust-based culture and
how organizations can achieveand maintainan optimal level of trust,
especially in todays virtual environment.
Q: What are some of the characteristics of a trust-based culture?
A: Structurally, trust-based cultures tend to have fewer layers and broader spans of control. Actions and
decisions are guided by values and goals. Communication is ample and flows freely up, down, and across the
organization. This atmosphere of openness often extends beyond the organization as well, to channel partners,suppliers, and customers.
Q: What benefits can organizations achieve from a trust-based culture?
A: Efficiency, responsiveness, and lower operating costs are the hallmarks of trust-based cultures. These
benefits derive from highly engaged and committed employees who can be more productive and focus on value-
added work because they arent bogged down by excessive policy and procedure or waiting for approval from
multiple layers of management. Theyre also willing to go the extra mile because they feel valued, respected,
and trusted to do whats in the best interest of the firms stakeholders.
Q: What does an organization that lacks trust look like?
A: Low-trust organizations tend to have tall organizational structures, with lots of layers and narrow spans of
control. Think in terms of impermeable silos. They are process heavy and require multiple approval levels to take
action or commit resources. Employee activity is heavily monitored. Information is scarce, with access to it based
on ones position or level.
Q: What is the potential fallout for organizations with a low level of trust?
A: Because low-trust organizations closely monitor all activity and engage in detailed data collection, employees
come to understand that information canand willbe used against them. They learn to engage in defensive
routines to protect themselves, including the withholding of negative information or bad news. This has the
effect of allowing relatively minor issues and problems to persist and fester. What could have been easily and
inexpensively addressed in the earliest stages compounds into the kind of crisis or event that makes
stakeholders ask, How could theyhave possibly allowed that to happen?
Q: Is it true too much trust can harm organizational performance?
A: It may sound counterintuitive, but when trust exceeds a certain threshold, performance can suffer or other
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
4/12
negative outcomes may occur. Remember that with trust comes the risk someone will exploit it for personal gain
or otherwise take advantage. In organizations with a balanced approach to trust, there is sufficient monitoring to
detect slacking or opportunism in its early stages. But in organizations with an extreme level of trust, monitoring
is often negligible and employee empowerment is typically very high. These conditions allow good employees to
flourish, but it also permits bad ones to freeloador worse. And any harmful behavior often goes undetecteduntil real economic harm has been done to the firm and its reputation.
Q: How can teams establish and build trust in todays virtual environment?
A: The single most important factor is the opportunity for face-to-face interaction, especially at the launch of a
new team or project or when there is a change in leadership, resources, or mission. Keep in mind that face-to-
face doesnt necessarily mean in-person (although that is ideal). There are plenty of low-cost options for group-
video conferencing these days. A secondary factor in helping virtual teams to build trust is to provide a way for
team members to learn about one another as people, not just as professionals. The goal is to help team
members discover ways in which they are similar, because the more we have in common with someone, the
more likely we are to trust.
Q: What are the best first steps toward developing a culture of trust?
A: First, confirm that you have the full commitment of the organizations leaders. If not, step back and facilitate
a dialogue at the highest levels about the relative importance of trust in achieving the organizations strategic
goals. Make the business argument for investing in change by educating the senior team about the comparative
costs and benefits of various trust levels. Finally, provide them with an estimate of the organizations trust gap
and map out a multi-year plan to influence the degree of openness, benevolence, risk-taking, and monitoring in
the organization.
If you want to learn more about specific actions to include in your multi-year trust plan, download the free
webinar, Can You Really Train Trust?, presented by Laurie Ribble Libove.
About the Author
Laurie Ribble Liboveis a specialist in strategic human resource management and organizational development.
She earned a M.S. from the School of Management and Labor Relations at Rutgers University and a B.S. in
Economics from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania. Prior to joining Napa Valley
College in 2009, Laurie was a Visiting Lecturer at the Haas School of Business, University of California - Berkeley
and an Instructor in the MBA program at Dominican University of California. Her publication credits include
training tools on change management, visionary leadership, team trust, and listening.
Source: Trust: THe Ultimate Test>
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
5/12
Taking Control of Conflict
Workplace productivity, employee engagement, and job satisfaction
probably arent the first things that come to mind when you think about
conflict. Since the days of Plato and Aristotle, conflict has been widely
recognized as the cause of many struggles, from stress and inefficiency to
poor decision making and employee turnover. Just look these eye-opening
statistics:
Almost 85% of employees experience conflict at work.
Managers spend as much as 40% of their time dealing with conflict.
Employees exhaust approximately 3 hours each weekin conflict situations.
Yikes! And to complicate things further, wrap your head around this: For all the damage inflicted by excessive
conflict, the absence of conflict can breed a culture of mistrust and complacency:
According to the management team at Intel, The only thing worse than too much conflict is no conflict at
all.
Former General Electric CEO Jack Welch coined the term superficial congeniality, in which everything was
pleasant on the surface, with distrust and savagery roiling beneath.
Clearly, conflict has been given a bum rap. But conflict itself is not the problem. In fact, it can be the secret to a
competitive advantage when its harnessed and well-managed. And that starts with education. Rather than
attempting to eliminate conflict, equip people with awareness, knowledge, and an effective strategy. That
is, awarenessof how individuals typically react in conflict situations, knowledgeof the consequences that result
from those reactions, and finally, the ability to select the most effective strategyfor responding to conflict in aproductive manner.
Model Conflict
Theories of conflict have shifted and evolved since Classical Greece. Today, the grid first introduced by
psychologists Robert Blake and Jane Mouton in 1964 continues to be the predominant conflict model. A matrix
that combines an individuals degree of concern for work output with his or her degree of concern for people
generates five different conflict strategies: Integrating, Compromising, Competing, Smoothing, andAvoiding.
Strategy Characteristics Drawbacks Appropriate UsesAppropriate Uses
Avoiding Leaves issues unresolved
Ignores personal needs
Fears conflict
Complacency
Resentment
Lack of willingness
Trivial Issues
Need to buy time
Reduce tension temporarily
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
6/12
Smoothing Yields to others
Selfless
Prefers harmony
Portrays the victim
Goals are not met
Pushover
Create goodwill
Keep the peace
Develop rapport
Competing Argues/debates
Wants to be right
Directs the outcome
Undermining
Erodes trust
Avoided by others
Need quick action
Protect core values
Emergency situations
Compromising Negotiates
Finds middle ground
Concedes
Neither needs met
Must revisit issues
Dissatisfaction
When time is an issue
Parties have equal power
Need temporary fix
Integrating Mutually beneficial
Listens activelyProblem solves
Requires time
Can be exhaustingComplex
Important issues
Need mutual agreementLong-term solutions
As you may have guessed, Integratingis the ideal strategy for successfully managing conflict on a consistent
basis. But even though its problem-solving focus yields positive results, there are times when its not possible to
invest the energy and collaboration it requires. Thats why its important to understand the situation, evaluate
the options, and then choosethe best-suited conflict strategy.
You dont have to cringe when youre in the midst of conflict. With some skill and know-how, youand your
organizationcan reap the benefits of conflict done right!
Sources:Taking Control of ConflictandConflict Strategies Inventory
Back to Top ^
Case Study: How the Negotiating StyleProfileHelped More than 600 Managers and
Directors to Strengthen Their NegotiatingSkills
Capitalizing on a Growth Trend after a Bottom-Floor Drop
Like so many industries in America, the hotel industry experienced a
number of volatile years between 2006 and 2012. After a high in 2006, the
occupancy rate (Occ%) and the average dollar rate (ADR) plummeted
dramatically between 2006 and 2009 before it began to rebound as the
https://www.hrdqstore.com/taking-control-of-conflict-soft-skills-training.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/taking-control-of-conflict-soft-skills-training.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/taking-control-of-conflict-soft-skills-training.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/conflict-strategies-inventory-experiential-learning.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/conflict-strategies-inventory-experiential-learning.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/conflict-strategies-inventory-experiential-learning.htmlhttp://www.hrdqstore.com/Insight-Newsletter--October-2013_df_133.html#tophttp://www.hrdqstore.com/Insight-Newsletter--October-2013_df_133.html#tophttp://www.hrdqstore.com/Insight-Newsletter--October-2013_df_133.html#tophttps://www.hrdqstore.com/conflict-strategies-inventory-experiential-learning.htmlhttps://www.hrdqstore.com/taking-control-of-conflict-soft-skills-training.html -
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
7/12
economy recovered. (See Figure 1 below.) The average daily rate
represents the average income per paid occupied room during a given time
frame. This combined with the occupancy rate is the foundation for
measuring a hotels financial performance.
Gary Turner, an expert in negotiating styles and leadership training, was contacted by his client, the Vice President of
Sales for a nationally-recognized upscale hotel chain. Although the organizations 2012 average daily rate was better
than the national average, my clients 2013 strategic goal is to achieve an even higher ratewithout damaging the
occupancy rate, said Gary. The Vice President of Sales was responsible for ensuring the General Managers and
Directors of Sales were equipped to achieve this goal.
Does Negotiating Style Help or Hinder Results?
Each of the clients hotels is managed by a General Manager and a Director of Sales who are responsible for
managing costs and maximizing sales. While both roles are required to negotiate as part of their everyday
responsibilities, their objectives are different. The General Managers negotiations are centered on securing operationservices and supplies such as repairmen, paper products, and more through a network of vendors. The Director of
Sales, on the other hand, is focused on selling accommodations to the hotels client base, including extended-stay
reservations and la carte services.
Garys client raised questions about negotiating style and how it impacts the objectives of each managers role:
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
8/12
Do General Managers have the urge to drive a tougher bargain because of the underlying pressure to maximize
revenue? Are they more demanding when making purchases?
Are Directors of Sales more accommodating now because times are good and being nice might help them to
establish beneficial long-term relationships with clients?
Are Directors of Sales hesitant to charge the higher rates that would increase the average daily rate but damage
the occupancy rate?
An Assessment of Negotiating Style
Garys recommended starting point was a self-assessment of personal negotiating styles. Based on Ury and Fishers
collaborative win-win model, and heavily influenced by the highly-respected Thomas-Kilmann conflict resolution
model, the Negotiating Style Profileoffers a simple framework for determining ones negotiating style and interprets
how that behavior is likely to affect relationships and results.
Presented with 30 different statements, individuals were asked to choose one of seven possible responses, ranging
from Completely Characteristicto Completely Uncharacteristic. Scores revealed a preference for one of fivenegotiating styles: Defeating,Accommodating, Collaborating, Withdrawing, or Compromising.
More than 600 General Managers and Directors of Sales were surveyed using the Negotiating Style Profileonline self-
assessment. The assessment results were grouped by title and then compared to the national norm:
Summary of Negotiating Style ProfileResults:
The distribution of styles between the General Managers and Directors of Sales is relatively parallel across the five
negotiating styles.
The Defeating,Accommodating, and Compromisingstyles are consistent with the national average.
The General Managers and the Directors of Sales both possess a higher rateof the Collaboratingstyle than the
national average.
The General Managers and the Directors of Sales possess the Withdrawingstyle less than the national average.
Combined, the Negotiating Style Profilescores indicate that both the General Managers and Directors of Sales
practice problem solving and patience more than most negotiators and they do not have the tendency to withdraw
from the negotiating process. (See Figure 2 above.)
Variations of each of the five negotiating styles may be appropriate in certain scenarios, and sometimes negotiators
may want to use a specific style for a particular type of negotiation. For example, if the other party exerts superior
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
9/12
power over the subject of the negotiation, a Withdrawingstance might be the most appropriate course of action in
order to achieve an agreement.
However, the style that produces the best results most consistently is the Collaboratingstyle. When satisfying mutual
needs is a paramount concern, both parties can harness problem-solving strategies that benefit both the outcome ofthe negotiation as well as the relationship of the parties. (See Figure 3 below.)
Negotiating Success Is a Matter of Style
Using the Negotiating Style Profileas the basis for insight and knowledge, Garys next step was to focus on the
importance of raising the organizations average daily rate by employing collaborative skills such asactive listening
and questioning. While this may be considered a basic skill, evidence shows that even the best collaborators lack the
ability to hear what is being said and ask questions that elicit important and valuable information. He utilized role-
play simulations as skill practice, with the General Managers acting as the client (a.k.a. the purchaser of
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
10/12
accommodations).
In one situation, a Director of Sales negotiated with a potential client who wanted to reserve 30 suites for an
organization that was in town during the summer months to centralize its IT function. The potential client received a
bid from a competing hotel for a nightly rate of $80. But what the Director of Sales did not know was three pieces ofimportant information about the potential client:
. There were several complaints about the competing hotel and it was not the first choice of accommodations for
the organizations employees and their families.
. The potential clients organization was building a new corporate office directly across the street from the Director
of Sales hotel location.
. Part of the centralization project required employees to get up during the middle of the night for system test
crashes.
During the simulation, the potential client was instructed to withhold these valuable tidbits unless the Director ofSales specifically asked for the information. The client was also told to pay extra to stay at the Director of Sales hotel
if it became necessary to complete the negotiation. The role play took approximately 10 minutes, at which time
the participants were told to come to an agreement in increments of $5. Figure 4 below illustrates that not everyone
got the same dealsome negotiated a better deal and some were not as successful.
Following the role-play simulation, Gary surveyed the Directors of Sales to see how many thought to ask the potential
-
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
11/12
client:
. Have you received any complaints about the accommodations at the competing hotel?
. Where is the location of the organizations new IT function?
. How oftenand whenwere the employees expected to be on site at the new office?
Approximately one-thirdof the negotiators thought to ask at least one of these probing questions. The negotiator
who achieved the $105 rate did obtain this information and used it to drive the higher suite rate. (See Figure 4
above.)
Conclusion
As the Negotiating Style Profilerevealed, Collaboratingis the dominant style of both the General Managers and the
Directors of Sales. While this style will help them to reach successful negotiating outcomes, Gary supplemented the
training with skill practice to further develop their skills.
The role-play simulations helped the Directors of Sales to apply the insights gained through the self-assessment.
Specifically, they learned the importance of asking probing questions to uncover important information relevant tothe negotiation. Coupled with action planning, the Vice President of Sales is confident the hotel chain will experience
an average daily rate increase to achieve its 2013 goal.
Click here for more information about the Negotiating Style Profile.
Gary Turneris an award-winning consultant and speaker with more than 30 years of experience in training and
development. He has worked with many prominent organizations, including M&M/Mars, Con-way Freight, Warner
Brothers, and Owens & Minor.
TRAINER EDUCATION SERIES
One hour of learning.
A lifetime of knowledge.Free Webinars - Register Today!
Trainer Education Webinars
Each month we deliver new webinars to help you better understand HRDQ products, gain industry insight, and
explore new ideas. Webinars are first offered live, with time for interaction with presenters. Each webinar is
http://www.hrdqstore.com/negotiation-style.htmlhttp://www.hrdqstore.com/negotiation-style.htmlhttp://www.hrdqstore.com/negotiation-style.htmlhttp://www.hrdqstore.com/negotiation-style.htmlhttp://www.hrdqstore.com/negotiation-style.html -
8/13/2019 HRDQ Insight Newsletter - October 2013
12/12
recorded for viewing after the live date.
top related