evaluation of the implementation of the op ‘good ... · • op good governance thematic...

Post on 10-Aug-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

INVESTING IN OUR SHARED FUTURETHE 8TH CONFERENCE ON THE EVALUATION OF EU COHESION POLICY

PROBLEM SETTING Analysis of the interventions, incl. factors influencing the OPGG’s implementation.

EVALUATION QUESTIONS • The correspondence between the

priorities in the OPGG and current socio-economic situation.

• Results achieved, measured by output, results and financial indicators.

• Dis/advantages of collecting data for the common indicator for long-term results about participants.

METHODOLOGY • Desk research• Survey• Interview

DATA SOURCES • Programme monitoring system• Indicator and Contribution analysis

MAIN FINDINGS • The strategic objectives in the OPGG

are relevant to the socio-economic situation.

• The key projects are under implementation.

• There are differences in the implementation of the indicators. Some indicators are over-performed. For other there are no progress. Two indicators (PA1, PA2) are at risk not to achieve the milestones for 2018.

• Some indicators have to be reformulated/deleted/replaced or change the target values.

• The electronic submission of project proposals and electronic reporting is a successful practice for reducing administrative burden.

• The implementation of the Annual plans for information and communication shows achievement of the target values of the indicators.

• Serious difficulties are expected for the planned counterfactual analysis.

CONCLUSIONS • In order to accelerate the certification

of funds, MA to organize meetings with key beneficiaries to discuss the possibilities for submitting payment so the funds to be verified and certified in a timely manner.

• The MA to assess the necessary funds under the PA5.

• The MA not to require documents that are not needed for verification (certificates of completion of training, etc.).

• Large-scale events to take place when launching key projects.

• The MA to plan evaluations mostly with theoretical approaches. Update of the Evaluation Plan.

• Selection of an external contractor for reporting the long-term performance indicators.

FUND(S) COVERED• European Social Fund (ESF)• Youth Employment Initiative (YEI)

PROGRAMMING PERIOD• 2014-2020

PROGRAMME(S) COVERED• OP Good Governance

THEMATIC OBJECTIVE(S)• TO11: Institutional capacity efficient

public administration

TYPE OF EVALUATION• Process

YEAR OF COMPLETION• 2018

AUTHOR(S) OF THE EVALUATION CONTACT PERSON Consortium ‘Consult’Ecorys South East Europe Bulgarian Consultancy Organization EOODD & D Consulting OOD

Militsa Yordanova Militsa.Yordanova@government.bg

Evaluation of the implementation of the OP ‘Good Governance’ and studies supporting

the planning and data collection •

Managing Authority of Operational Programme ‘Good Governance’

top related