bibliography - inflibnetshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/70781/11/11_bibliography.pdf ·...
Post on 12-Mar-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
229
Bibliography
1. Adhiguru, P. et al. 2008. Agricultural research and technology
transfer to farmers. University News 46(05): 65-74.
2. Adithyakumari, H. and Rao, Shivaram, H. 2000. The Nucleus: An
international journal of Cytology and allied topics - A
bibliometric study. SRELS Journal of Information Management.
37(1): 59-74.
3. Allue - Quesada La and Gitlin, D. S. 1995. Scientific output ill
Argertina 1966 - 83. Scientometrics 34 (1): 27 - 35.
4. Angadi, Mallikarjun et al. 2006. Nobel laureate Anthony J.
Leggett: A scientometric portrait. Annals ofLibrary and Information
Studies 53(4): 203-212
5. Angadi, Mallikarjun et al. 2006. Publication productivity of Tata
Insititute of Social Science: a scientometric study. SRELS Journal
ofInformation Management 43 (4): 363-74
6. Ani! Kumar. etal. 2008. Pramana - Journal of Physics: A
scientometric analysis.Annals of Library and Information Studies.
55(1): 52-61.
7. Anilkumar, et al. 2008. Web resources in INSPEC database: A
sceintometric mapping. SRELS Journal of Information Management.
45(a): 197-208
8. Anup Kumar Das and Aruna Karanjai. 2002. Institutional
distribution in computer science research in India: A study.
Annals ofLibrary and Information Science 49 (1) :23 - 27.
230
9. Anuradha, K.T. and Ramya, S.K. 2008. Scientific collaboration in
academic institutions: A case study with Indian Institute of
Science publications. SRELS Journal of Information Management.
45(2): 181-196.
10. Aparna Basu and Vinu Kumar, B. S. 2000. International
collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scient'ometrics 48 (3): 381
402.
11. Beaver, D and Rosen, R. 1978. Studies on scientific collaboration.
PartI: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship.
Scientometrics 1: 65-84.
12. Beck, M. T and Gaspar, V. 1991. Scientometric evaluation of
the scientific performance of the faculty of natural science,
Kossuth Lajos University, Debrecen, Hungary. Scientometrics 20:
72-77.
13. Bhatia, Ketki et al. 2006. Research trends in a premier institute
based on annual report. Annals of Library and Information Studies.
53(2): 61-64.
14. Chu Keong Lee. 2003. A scientometric study of the research
performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in
Singapore. Scientometrics 56(1): 95-110.
15. Daniel, H. D. and Fisch, R. 1990. Research performance
evaluation In German University sector. Scientometrics 19: 349
361.
16. Davarpanah, M.R and Aslekia, S. 2008. a scientometric analysis of
international LIS journals: productivity and characteristics.
Scientometrics 77(1): 21-39
231
17. Dayanatha Jha and Sant Kumar, 2006. Research resource
allocation In Indian agriculture. NCAP Policy paper No. 23,
National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research,
New Delhi.
18. Devarai Rajasekhara, S. et aI. 1998. Informetrics on M. N.
Srinivas. Annals afLibrary and Documentation 45 (4) : 125-135.
19. Dizon, L. B and Sadorra, M. S. M. 1995. Patterns of publication by
the staff of an international fisheries research center. Scientometrics
32 (1): 67- 75.
20. Farahat, Hashem. 2002. Authorship pattern in agricultural science
in Egypt. Scientometrics 55 (2):157-170.
21. Fonseca, L. et al. 1997. The importance of human relationships in
scientific productivity. Scientometrics 39 (2): 159 - 171.
22. Gander J.P. 1999. Faculty gender effects on academic research
and teaching. Research in Higher Education 40(2): 171-184.
23. Ganguli, ranjan.2008. A scientometric analysis of recent aerospace
research. Current Science 95(12): 1670-72
24. . Garg, K. C. 2002. Scientometrics of laser research with special
reference to India. NISTADS News 4 (1):3.
25. Garg, K.C. 2006. A preliminary scientometric investigation of
malaria research. Annals of Library and Information Studies. 53(1):
43-53.
26. Garg, K.C. et aI. 2008. scientometric profile of the journal
Mausam. Annals afLibrary and Information Studies 55(1): 76-80
27. Geetha, P. and Varghese, M. 1998. Scientometric study of
Prof. C. N. R. Rao, the doyen of Solid State Chemistry in India.
Kelpro Bulletin 2 (2) : 67 - 69.
232
28. Gilbert, G.N. 1978. Measuring the growth of science: a review of
literature. Scientometrics 1 (1): 9-34
29. Gokceoglu, Candan, et al. 2008. International earth science
literature from Turkey- 1970-2005: Trends and possible causes.
Scientometrics 74(3): 409-23.
30. Gopikkuttan. A. 2004. A scientometric analysis of research
productivity of faculty members in the Science departments of
University of Kerala. Ph. D thesis, University of Kerala
31. Grogan, Denis.1976. Science and technology: an introduction to the
literature. Ed3. London, Clive Bingly.
32. Gunasekaran, s. et al Mapping chemical science research in India:
a bibliometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies.
53(2): 83-95.
33. Gupta, B. M., et al. 1999. Comparison of productivity of male and
female scientists of CSIR. Scientometrics 45 (2): 269 - 289.
34. Gupta, B.M and Dhawan, S.M. 2008. Condensed Matter Physics:
An analysis of India's research output, 1993-2001. Scientometrics.
75(1): 123-144
35. Gupta, B.M and Karisiddappa, c.R. 2000. Application of statistical
models to the collaborative publications data in theoretical
population genetics. Malasian Journal of Library & Information
Science 5 (1): 37-51. .36. Gupta, B.M. et al. 2004. Regional collaboration in S & T among
South Asian countries. Annals of Library and Information Studies
51(4): 121-132.
233
37. Gupta, D. K. 1992. Scientometric study of exploration geophysics:
author productivity trends. Annals of Library Science and
Documentation 39 (4) : 145 - 52.
38. Guta, D. K. 1993. Author productivity patterns: Geoscientific
literature of Nigeria for the period 1904-1979. Library Science with a
Slant to Documentation 30 (2): 76 -89.
39. Guttikonda, Aneeja and Gautam, Sridhar. 2009. Prospects of open
access to Indian agricultural research: A case study of ICAR.
Accessed at http://firstsunday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.
40. Haiqi, Z and Yuhua, Z. 1997. Scientometric study on research
performance in China. Information Processing and Management 33
(1): 81 - 90.
41. Haiqui, Z. 1996. Research performance in key Medical
Universities in China observed from scientific productivity.
Scientometrics 37(1): 177 - 90.
42. Hasan, Nabi and Sewa Singh. 2007. Agricultural research in
Himachal Pradesh: A profile based on AGRICOLA, AGRIS, CAB
and FSTA CD-ROM databases. SRELS Journal of Information
Management 44(3): 279-300.
43. Hawkins, D.T. 1978. Bibliometric of the online information
retrieval literature. Online Review. 2: 345-351
44. Ho, Y. S. et al. 2003. Assessing stem cell research productivity.
Scientometrics 57 (3): 369 - 376.
45. Hood, William, W and Wilson, Concepcion,S. 2001. The literature of
bibliomeb"ics, scientometrics and informetrics. Scientometrics 52 (2): 291
314.
46. http://www.icar.org.in/sau.htm accessed in 10-9-2009
234
47. Huber, J. C. 2001. A new method for analyzing scientific
productivity. JASIST 52 (13): 1089 -99.
48. India, Education Commission 1966. Report of the Education
Commission (1964-66) Delhi, Ministry of Education, 598.
49. Jacquelineleta and Lewison, Grant. 2003. Contribution of
women In Brazilian Science: A case study in Astronomy,
Immunology and Oceanography. Scientometrics 57 (3): 339 - 53.
50. Jain, N.C. 2009. Five Indian journals cross impact factor 1000 in
2008. Current Science 97 (9): 1273 naasindia.org/documentj
criteria.pdf. Accessed on 23-10-2009.
51. Jeevan, V. K. J. and Gupta, B. M. 2002. A scientometric analysis
of research output from Indian Institute of Technology, Khargpur.
Scientometrics 53 (1): 165 -168.
52. Kabir, Humayoon S. 2000. Contribution of Indian agricultural
scientists in foreign agricultural periodicals - a quantitative.study.
Journal ofInformation, Library and Society 13 (3 - 4): 212 - 222
53. Kadeimani, B.s. et al. 2007. Scientometric profile and publication
productivity of the radio chemistry division at Bhabha Atomic
Research Centre. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 44 (2):
99-124
54. Kademani, B. S. et al 2002.
laureate Harold W. Kroto.
Scientometric portrait of Nobel
SRELS Journal. of Information
Management 39 (4): 409 -434.
55. Kademani, B. S. et al. 1996. Scientometric portrait of Sir. K. S.
Krishnan. Indian Journal of Information, Library and Society 9 (1-2) :
125 -137.
235
56. Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L. 1998. Scientometric portrait
of R. Chidambaram, the Indian Nuclear Physicist: based on
citation analysis. Kelpro Bulletin 2 (1): 13 -29.
57. Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L. and Vijay Kumar. 2000.
Scientometric portrait of Vikram Ambalal Sarabhai: A citation
analysis. SRELS Journal. of Information Management 37 (2): 107
131.
58. Kademani, B.s et al. 2005. Publication productivity of the Bio
orgaruc division at Bhaba Atomic Research Centre: a
scientometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies 52(4:
135-146
59. Kademani, B.S. et al. 2006. Scientometric dimensions and
publication productivity of the Analytical Chemistry division at
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. SRELS Journal of Information
Management. 43(1): 5-20.
60. Kademani, B.s., Kalyane, V.L. and Balakrishnan, M. R. 1994.
Scientometric portrait of P. K. Iyengar. Library Science with a Slant
to Documentation 31(4): 155 -176.
61. Kalyane, V. L. and Kalyane, S. V. 1994. Scientometric portrait
of M.S. Swaminathan. Library Science with a Slant to
Documentation 31 (1): 31- 46.
62. Kalyane, V. L. and Vidya Sagar Rao, K. 1991. Collaboration
trends in sugarcane research - a case study. Annals of Library
Science and Documentation 38 (4): 9 -11.
63. Kalyane, V. L., Prakasan, E. R. and Vijay Kumar. 2001.
Scientometric portrait of Ranjit Kuamr Mitra. ILA Bulletin 37 (2) :
39 - 53.
236
64. Kalyane, V.L. and Kademani, B.s. 1997. Scientometric portrait of
Barbara Mc Clintock: The Nobel laureate in Physiology. Kelpro
Bulletin 1 (1): 3 -14.
65. Kamble, Pradeep S. 2003. Bibliographics on publication
productivity of J. V. Narlikar and his collaborators. Kelpro Bulletin
7 (1&2): 72 -78.
66. Kamlesh Goel. 2002. Gender differences in publication
productivity in psychology in India. Scientometrics 55(2): 243 - 258.
67. Kamlesh Goel. 2002a. Bibliometric study of gender differences in
the field of psychology in India. Journal of Library & Information
Science 27 (1): 11 -23.
68. Kannaiyan, C.s., et al. 2001. Accountability in agricultural
education. Productivity 42 (2): 307-17
69. Kannappanavar, B. U. and Nulvi, C. N. 1991. Authorship trend
and solo research in Rural transformation: A bibliometric study.
ILA Bulletin 27(1) : 38-41
70. Karisiddappa, C. R., et al. 2002. Scientific productivity of authors
in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics 53 (1): 73- 93.
71. Kaur, Prabhjot and Dhaliwal, R.K.2008. A study of work output of
agricultural scientists of selected state agricultural universities of
t northern region. Journal ofInteracademicia 12(4): 548-552
72. Kawamura,M.et al.1999. Lotka's law and the pattern of scientific
productivity in the dental science literature. Medical Informatics
and Internet In Medicine 24(4): 309-315
http://search.ebscohost.com (accessed on 12.6.2009)
73. Kerala Agricultural University. 2001. Self study report for
accreditation. Thrissur, Kerala Agricultural University, 1.
237
74. Klaic, B. 1995. Analysis of the scientific productivity of
researchers from the Republic of Croatia for the period 1990 - 92.
Scientometrics 32 (2): 133 - 152.
75. Kaley, Susanta and Sen, B.K 2006. A bibliometric study of
Prof. B.N. Kaley, an eminent physiologist. Annals of Library and
Information Studies 53(2): 74-82.
76. Krampen, Gunter. 2008. The evaluation of university
departments andtheir scientists: Some general considerations with
reference to exemplary bibliometric publications and citation
analysis for a department of psychology. Scientometrics 76(1): 3-21.
77. Krauskopf, M. et al. 1995. Assessment of a university's scientific
capabilities and profile: The case of faculty of Biological science of
the Pontificia Universidad Catolica De Chile. Scientometrics 34 (1):
87 -100.
78. Kumbar, Mallinath and Akhtary, Syed. 1998. Bibliometric
analysis of Opthalmology literature. Library Science with aslant to
Documentation and Information Studies. 35(3): 201-07.
79. Kumbar, Mallinath et al. 2008. Growth and impact of research
output of University of Mysore 1999-2006: A case study. Annals of
Library and Information Studies. 55(3): 185-195.
80. Le Minor, S. and Dostani, P. 1991. Bibliometric study of the
French National Institute of Health and Medical Research
(INSERM). Scientometrics 22: 41- 63.
81. Lemoine, W. 1992. Distribution of research papers in CSIR.
Scientometrics 24: 450 - 457.
238
82. Lemoine, W. 1992. The frequency distribution of research papers
and patents according to sex: The case study of CSIR, India.
Scientometrics 24 (3): 449 - 469.
83. Maclean, J. and Janagap, C. 1993. The publication productivity
of international agricultural research centres. Scientometrics 28 (3):
329 - 48.
84. Mahapatra, R.K. and Jena, Padmanav. 2006. Scientific research
productivity on Orissa: A bibliometric analysis. Annals of Library
and Information Studies 53(1): 18-21.
85. Maheswarappa, BS and Mathias, S.A. 1988. Multiple authorship
and collaboration research in biological sciences in India: a
bibliometric study. Library Herald 27( %): 86-94.
86. Maheswarappa, B.S, et al. 1984. Collaborative research in science
and technology in India. Journal of Library and Information
Science 9 (2): 154-159.
87. Maheswarappa, B.S. and Mathias, S.A. 1987. Authorical
collaboration in various disciplines of the physical science in
India. A bibliometric study. Journal of Library and Information
Science 2 (2): 136-155
88. Maheswarappa, BS. and Mathias, S.A.1987 Research collaboration
in different disciplines of applied sciences in India (1965-1983).
IASLIC Bulletin 32 (3): 105-114.
89. Manjunath, L. et al. 2008. Determinants of scientific
productivity of agricultural scientists. Karnataka Journal of
Agricultural Science 21(3): 466-68.
90. Meadows, A.J. 1974. Communication in science. Butterworths.
239
91. Melin, Goran and Persson, Olle. 1998. Hotel Cosmopolitan: A
bibliometric study of collaboration at some European Universities.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (1): 43-48.
92. Mendiki, P.S. 2006. Order of authorship. Current Science 90: 1457.
93. Munnolli, Satish. S. and Kalyane, V. L. 2003. Scientometric
portrait of Ram Gopal Rastogi. Annals of Library & Information
Studies. 50 (1): 1 -17.
94. Nalini, J.K. 2003. Occupational health related publications in
India: a bibliometric analysis of journals. SRELS Journal of
Information Management 40(1): 41-50
95. Oliveira, Martins, et al. 1999, Conditional variables of the
scientific production process of the agricultural research centres of
Embrapa. Ciencia da Informacao 19 (1): 30 -39.
96. Parvathamma N. et al. 2008. T.M. Aminabhavi: a bibliometric
study. Annals ofLibrary and Information Studies 55(2): 127-134.
97. Parvathamma, N and Gobbur, Devendra,S. 2007. Mapping of
plastics literature(1999-2008): a bibliometric study. SRELS Journal
ofInformation Management 40(1): 41-50
98. Parvathamma, N. et al. 1993. Growth pattern of literature and
productivity of author in Indian earth science (1978 -88): A
bibliometric study. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation 30
(2): 54 -64.
99. Patel, Y.M. and Kumar, P.S.G. 1998. Pedological literature
analysis. Library Science with a slant to Documentation and
Information Studies. 35(2): 125-132.
100. Posner, R.A. 2001. Public intellectual: A study of decline.
Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
240
101. Pratap, Gangan and Gupta, B.M. 2009. Ranking of Indian
Engineering and technological institutes for their research
performance during 1999-2008. Current Science 97(3): 304-06.
102. Preman, P. K. 2001. Scientific productivity of scientists In
Regional Cancer Centre, Trivasndrum. M. Phil. Dissertation,
University of Kerala.
103. Price, D.J. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University
Press, London.
104. Price, De Solla.1963. Little science, big science. London, Columbia
University press.
105. Prpic, K. 2002. Gender and productivity differentials in science.
Scientometrics 55(1): 27-58.
106. Prpic, Katarina. 1994. The Socio-cognitive frameworks of
scientific productivity. Scientometrics 31(3): 293 - 311.
107. Prpic, Katarina. 1996 a. Characteristics and determinants of
eminent scientist's productivity. Scientometrics 36 (2): 186 - 206.
108. Prpic, Katarina. 1996. Scientific fields and eminent scientist's
productivity pattern and factors. Scientometrics 37 (3): 445 - 471.
109. Prpic, Katarina. 2000. The publication productivity of young
scientists: An empirical study. Scientometrics 49 (3): 453 - 490.
110. Rajendran, P. et a1..2005. Bibliometric analysis of fiber optics
literature. Annals afLibrary and Information Studies 52(3): 82-85
111. Ramaakrishana, N.V. 2009. Modelling the growth of ferrous metallurgy
literature:a study based on iron making and steel making. SRELS
Journal of Information Management 46 (4): 413-421
241
112. Ramakrishna, J and Ramesh Babu,B. 2007. Literature on hepatitis
(1984-2003): a bibliometric analysis. Annals of Library and
Information Studies. 54(4): 195-200
113. Ramakrishna, N. V and Pangannaya, N. B. 1999. Growth of
animals cell culture technology: A correlation between citations
and publications based on growth curves. Library Science with a
Slant to Documentation & Information Studies 36 (1) : 21 -26.
114. Ramesh, L.S.R.C.V., et al. bibliometric study. SRELS Journal of
Information Management. 37(3): 215-27.
115. Randhawa, M.s. 1963. Agricultural research in India:
Institutes and organizations. New Delhi, leAR.
116. Ranganathan, S.R. 1964. Classified catalogue code. 5th Ed. Asia
Publishing House, Bombay. P 126
117. RaviChandra Rao, I.K. 1980. The distribution of scientific productivity
and social change. Journal of the (imerican Society for Information Science
31 (2): 111-122.
118. Rey-Rocha, Jesus et al. 2002. Research productivity of
consolidated vs non-consolidated teams. The case of Spanish
University Geologists. Scientometrics 55 (1): 137 - 56.
119. Riikonen, pentti and Vihinen, Mauno.2008. National research
contribution: a case study on Finnish bio-medical research.
Scientometrics 77(2): 207-222
120. Sahu, J. R. 2000. National mapping of Science - India: Earth
Sciences.Information Today & Tomorrow 19 (3) : 17 -18
121. Sangam, S.L and Keshava. 2003. Growth pattern of literature in
the field of social science. SRELS journal of Information
Management 40 (1): 77-84
242
122. Sangam, S.L and Kiran,Savanur. 2006. Dr.N Rudraiah: a
bibliometric study. SRELS Journal of Information Management
43(2); 185-199
123. Sarala, K. R. 2004. Scientific productivity of agricultural scientists
in the College of Agriculture, Vellayani. M.Phil Dissertation.
University of Kerala.
124. Sarala, K.R. 1995. A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of
TropicalAgriculture. Library Science with a slant to Documentation
and Information Studies. 32 (4) : 165-171.
125. Sarala, K.R. 2004. Scientific Productivity of Agricultural Scientists
in the College of Agriculture, Thiruvananthapuram. M. Phil
dissertation. University of Kerala.
126. Satyanarayana, K. 2000. Mapping of Science - India:
Biomedical sciences Information Today & Tomorrow 19 (1) :17 - 21
127. Schloegl. Christian et al. 2003. Evaluating two Australian University
departments: Lessons learned. Scientometrics 56 (3): '2B7 - 299.
128. Scimago, Grupo. 2007. lSI productivity of the Spanish
Universities (2000-04). El Professional de la informacion 16(4):
354-58. http://web.ebscohost.com (accessed on 12-6-09)
129. Seglen, Pero, et al. 2000. Scientific productivity and group
size - A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological
research. Scientometrics 49 (1): 125 -143.
130. Senthilkumar P. and Amudavalli, A. 2007. A quantitative
analysis of the Spices Literature in India. Annals of Library and
Information Studies. 54(3): 152-57
243
131. Sevukan, R. et al.. 2007. Research output of faculties of Plant
Sciences in Central Universities in India: A bibliometric study.
Annals ofLibrary and Information Studies. 54(3): 129-39.
132. Shrum, Wesley. 1997. View from afar: "Visible" productivity of
scientists in the developing world. Scientometrics 40 (2): 215 - 235.
133. Singh, Yogendra et al. 2005. Research contributions and impact
of research of Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 1993 to
2001. Annals ofLibrary and Information Studies. 52(1): 8-14.
134. Sinha, S. C. and Furoquan Ullah. 1993. Eleven years of CBRI
research output, 1980-90. A bibliometric study. Annals of Library
and Documentation 40 (3) : 77 - 91.
135. Subbaiah Arunachalam and Rino, S. 1. 2004. Life science research
in India: A profile based on Biosis 1998. http://itt.nissat.tripod.
com/ittOl 04jbiorep.htm
136. Subbiah Arunachalam and Umarani, K. 2001. Mapping
agricultural research in India: A profile based on CAB Abstracts
1998.Cuurent Science 81 (8): 896 - 906.
137. Subramanyam, K. 1983. Bibliometric studies of research
collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science 6: 35-37.
138. Sudhier, K. G. 1997. Output of scientific research in Kerala:
A bibliometric analysis. Annals of Library Science and
Documentation 44 (4) :113 - 25.
139. Surendra Kumar and Kumar, S. 2004. Productometric study of
ICAR'S National Research Centre for Soybean (NRCS). Annals of
Library and Information Studies 51 (1) :11- 21.
140. Suresh Kumar. 2003. Ltoka's Law and author productivity in the field
of Computer Science in India. Library Herald 41 (2): 90 - 97.
244
141. Suriya, M. and Manimekalai, A. 1997. Research productivity of
the Academic community of the Marine Biological Center,
Annamalai University. Kelpro Bulletin 1 (1): 20 -26.
142. Surwase, Ganesh, et al. 2008. scientometric dimensions of pulsed
laser deposition research: a global perspective. Annals of Library
and Information Studies 55(2): 101-110
143. Tsay, Ming-Yueh, 2004. Literature growth, journal characteristics
and author productivity in subject Indexing 1977 - 2000. JASIST
55 (1): 64 - 73
144. Udofia, Udofia Hon. 2002. Bibliometric studies on African
Trypanosomiasic research literature: a research of authorship
pattern. Annals of Library and Information Studies 49 (2): 45-49.
145. Ulrich's Periodicals Directory. 2009. Ed. 47. ProQuest, New
Jersey.
146. Vanecek, Jiri. 2008. Bibliometric analysis of the Czech research
publications from 1994-2005. Scientometrics 77(2): 345-60.
147. Vijay, K.R.2005. Bibliometric study of research publication trends
among Indian Food Scientists and Technologists. Annals of
Library and Infoemation Studies 52(3): 77-81
148. Webster, Berenika, M. 2001. Polish women In science: a
bibliometric analysis of polish science and its publications, 1980
99. Research Evaluation 10 (3): 185 -194.
149. Yesan, S. and Ally Sornam, S. 2001. A study on the factors
affecting school-ady productivity of faculty of Regional
Engeneering College (REC), Trichy. Kelpro Bulletin 5 (2): 10 -14.
245
150. Ying He and Gaun, Jiancheng. 2008. Contribution of Chinese
publications in computer science: A case study on LNCS.
Scientometrics 75(3): 519-34.
151. Zhou, Feng, et al. 2007. Scientometric analysis of geostatistics
using multi-variate methods. Scientometrics. 73(3): 265-270
152. Zipf, G.K. 1949. Human behaviour and the principle of least
effort. Reading Mass, Addison Wesley.
153. Zumelzu, E. 1997. Mainstream engineering publishing in Latin
America: The Chilean experience. Scientometrics 40 (1) 3 -12
•
top related