229

Bibliography

1. Adhiguru, P. et al. 2008. Agricultural research and technology

transfer to farmers. University News 46(05): 65-74.

2. Adithyakumari, H. and Rao, Shivaram, H. 2000. The Nucleus: An

international journal of Cytology and allied topics - A

bibliometric study. SRELS Journal of Information Management.

37(1): 59-74.

3. Allue - Quesada La and Gitlin, D. S. 1995. Scientific output ill

Argertina 1966 - 83. Scientometrics 34 (1): 27 - 35.

4. Angadi, Mallikarjun et al. 2006. Nobel laureate Anthony J.

Leggett: A scientometric portrait. Annals ofLibrary and Information

Studies 53(4): 203-212

5. Angadi, Mallikarjun et al. 2006. Publication productivity of Tata

Insititute of Social Science: a scientometric study. SRELS Journal

ofInformation Management 43 (4): 363-74

6. Ani! Kumar. etal. 2008. Pramana - Journal of Physics: A

scientometric analysis.Annals of Library and Information Studies.

55(1): 52-61.

7. Anilkumar, et al. 2008. Web resources in INSPEC database: A

sceintometric mapping. SRELS Journal of Information Management.

45(a): 197-208

8. Anup Kumar Das and Aruna Karanjai. 2002. Institutional

distribution in computer science research in India: A study.

Annals ofLibrary and Information Science 49 (1) :23 - 27.

230

9. Anuradha, K.T. and Ramya, S.K. 2008. Scientific collaboration in

academic institutions: A case study with Indian Institute of

Science publications. SRELS Journal of Information Management.

45(2): 181-196.

10. Aparna Basu and Vinu Kumar, B. S. 2000. International

collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scient'ometrics 48 (3): 381­

402.

11. Beaver, D and Rosen, R. 1978. Studies on scientific collaboration.

PartI: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship.

Scientometrics 1: 65-84.

12. Beck, M. T and Gaspar, V. 1991. Scientometric evaluation of

the scientific performance of the faculty of natural science,

Kossuth Lajos University, Debrecen, Hungary. Scientometrics 20:

72-77.

13. Bhatia, Ketki et al. 2006. Research trends in a premier institute

based on annual report. Annals of Library and Information Studies.

53(2): 61-64.

14. Chu Keong Lee. 2003. A scientometric study of the research

performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in

Singapore. Scientometrics 56(1): 95-110.

15. Daniel, H. D. and Fisch, R. 1990. Research performance

evaluation In German University sector. Scientometrics 19: 349 ­

361.

16. Davarpanah, M.R and Aslekia, S. 2008. a scientometric analysis of

international LIS journals: productivity and characteristics.

Scientometrics 77(1): 21-39

231

17. Dayanatha Jha and Sant Kumar, 2006. Research resource

allocation In Indian agriculture. NCAP Policy paper No. 23,

National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research,

New Delhi.

18. Devarai Rajasekhara, S. et aI. 1998. Informetrics on M. N.

Srinivas. Annals afLibrary and Documentation 45 (4) : 125-135.

19. Dizon, L. B and Sadorra, M. S. M. 1995. Patterns of publication by

the staff of an international fisheries research center. Scientometrics

32 (1): 67- 75.

20. Farahat, Hashem. 2002. Authorship pattern in agricultural science

in Egypt. Scientometrics 55 (2):157-170.

21. Fonseca, L. et al. 1997. The importance of human relationships in

scientific productivity. Scientometrics 39 (2): 159 - 171.

22. Gander J.P. 1999. Faculty gender effects on academic research

and teaching. Research in Higher Education 40(2): 171-184.

23. Ganguli, ranjan.2008. A scientometric analysis of recent aerospace

research. Current Science 95(12): 1670-72

24. . Garg, K. C. 2002. Scientometrics of laser research with special

reference to India. NISTADS News 4 (1):3.

25. Garg, K.C. 2006. A preliminary scientometric investigation of

malaria research. Annals of Library and Information Studies. 53(1):

43-53.

26. Garg, K.C. et aI. 2008. scientometric profile of the journal

Mausam. Annals afLibrary and Information Studies 55(1): 76-80

27. Geetha, P. and Varghese, M. 1998. Scientometric study of

Prof. C. N. R. Rao, the doyen of Solid State Chemistry in India.

Kelpro Bulletin 2 (2) : 67 - 69.

232

28. Gilbert, G.N. 1978. Measuring the growth of science: a review of

literature. Scientometrics 1 (1): 9-34

29. Gokceoglu, Candan, et al. 2008. International earth science

literature from Turkey- 1970-2005: Trends and possible causes.

Scientometrics 74(3): 409-23.

30. Gopikkuttan. A. 2004. A scientometric analysis of research

productivity of faculty members in the Science departments of

University of Kerala. Ph. D thesis, University of Kerala

31. Grogan, Denis.1976. Science and technology: an introduction to the

literature. Ed3. London, Clive Bingly.

32. Gunasekaran, s. et al Mapping chemical science research in India:

a bibliometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies.

53(2): 83-95.

33. Gupta, B. M., et al. 1999. Comparison of productivity of male and

female scientists of CSIR. Scientometrics 45 (2): 269 - 289.

34. Gupta, B.M and Dhawan, S.M. 2008. Condensed Matter Physics:

An analysis of India's research output, 1993-2001. Scientometrics.

75(1): 123-144

35. Gupta, B.M and Karisiddappa, c.R. 2000. Application of statistical

models to the collaborative publications data in theoretical

population genetics. Malasian Journal of Library & Information

Science 5 (1): 37-51. .36. Gupta, B.M. et al. 2004. Regional collaboration in S & T among

South Asian countries. Annals of Library and Information Studies

51(4): 121-132.

233

37. Gupta, D. K. 1992. Scientometric study of exploration geophysics:

author productivity trends. Annals of Library Science and

Documentation 39 (4) : 145 - 52.

38. Guta, D. K. 1993. Author productivity patterns: Geoscientific

literature of Nigeria for the period 1904-1979. Library Science with a

Slant to Documentation 30 (2): 76 -89.

39. Guttikonda, Aneeja and Gautam, Sridhar. 2009. Prospects of open

access to Indian agricultural research: A case study of ICAR.

Accessed at http://firstsunday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.

40. Haiqi, Z and Yuhua, Z. 1997. Scientometric study on research

performance in China. Information Processing and Management 33

(1): 81 - 90.

41. Haiqui, Z. 1996. Research performance in key Medical

Universities in China observed from scientific productivity.

Scientometrics 37(1): 177 - 90.

42. Hasan, Nabi and Sewa Singh. 2007. Agricultural research in

Himachal Pradesh: A profile based on AGRICOLA, AGRIS, CAB

and FSTA CD-ROM databases. SRELS Journal of Information

Management 44(3): 279-300.

43. Hawkins, D.T. 1978. Bibliometric of the online information

retrieval literature. Online Review. 2: 345-351

44. Ho, Y. S. et al. 2003. Assessing stem cell research productivity.

Scientometrics 57 (3): 369 - 376.

45. Hood, William, W and Wilson, Concepcion,S. 2001. The literature of

bibliomeb"ics, scientometrics and informetrics. Scientometrics 52 (2): 291­

314.

46. http://www.icar.org.in/sau.htm accessed in 10-9-2009

234

47. Huber, J. C. 2001. A new method for analyzing scientific

productivity. JASIST 52 (13): 1089 -99.

48. India, Education Commission 1966. Report of the Education

Commission (1964-66) Delhi, Ministry of Education, 598.

49. Jacquelineleta and Lewison, Grant. 2003. Contribution of

women In Brazilian Science: A case study in Astronomy,

Immunology and Oceanography. Scientometrics 57 (3): 339 - 53.

50. Jain, N.C. 2009. Five Indian journals cross impact factor 1000 in

2008. Current Science 97 (9): 1273 naasindia.org/documentj

criteria.pdf. Accessed on 23-10-2009.

51. Jeevan, V. K. J. and Gupta, B. M. 2002. A scientometric analysis

of research output from Indian Institute of Technology, Khargpur.

Scientometrics 53 (1): 165 -168.

52. Kabir, Humayoon S. 2000. Contribution of Indian agricultural

scientists in foreign agricultural periodicals - a quantitative.study.

Journal ofInformation, Library and Society 13 (3 - 4): 212 - 222

53. Kadeimani, B.s. et al. 2007. Scientometric profile and publication

productivity of the radio chemistry division at Bhabha Atomic

Research Centre. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 44 (2):

99-124

54. Kademani, B. S. et al 2002.

laureate Harold W. Kroto.

Scientometric portrait of Nobel

SRELS Journal. of Information

Management 39 (4): 409 -434.

55. Kademani, B. S. et al. 1996. Scientometric portrait of Sir. K. S.

Krishnan. Indian Journal of Information, Library and Society 9 (1-2) :

125 -137.

235

56. Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L. 1998. Scientometric portrait

of R. Chidambaram, the Indian Nuclear Physicist: based on

citation analysis. Kelpro Bulletin 2 (1): 13 -29.

57. Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L. and Vijay Kumar. 2000.

Scientometric portrait of Vikram Ambalal Sarabhai: A citation

analysis. SRELS Journal. of Information Management 37 (2): 107 ­

131.

58. Kademani, B.s et al. 2005. Publication productivity of the Bio­

orgaruc division at Bhaba Atomic Research Centre: a

scientometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies 52(4:

135-146

59. Kademani, B.S. et al. 2006. Scientometric dimensions and

publication productivity of the Analytical Chemistry division at

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. SRELS Journal of Information

Management. 43(1): 5-20.

60. Kademani, B.s., Kalyane, V.L. and Balakrishnan, M. R. 1994.

Scientometric portrait of P. K. Iyengar. Library Science with a Slant

to Documentation 31(4): 155 -176.

61. Kalyane, V. L. and Kalyane, S. V. 1994. Scientometric portrait

of M.S. Swaminathan. Library Science with a Slant to

Documentation 31 (1): 31- 46.

62. Kalyane, V. L. and Vidya Sagar Rao, K. 1991. Collaboration

trends in sugarcane research - a case study. Annals of Library

Science and Documentation 38 (4): 9 -11.

63. Kalyane, V. L., Prakasan, E. R. and Vijay Kumar. 2001.

Scientometric portrait of Ranjit Kuamr Mitra. ILA Bulletin 37 (2) :

39 - 53.

236

64. Kalyane, V.L. and Kademani, B.s. 1997. Scientometric portrait of

Barbara Mc Clintock: The Nobel laureate in Physiology. Kelpro

Bulletin 1 (1): 3 -14.

65. Kamble, Pradeep S. 2003. Bibliographics on publication

productivity of J. V. Narlikar and his collaborators. Kelpro Bulletin

7 (1&2): 72 -78.

66. Kamlesh Goel. 2002. Gender differences in publication

productivity in psychology in India. Scientometrics 55(2): 243 - 258.

67. Kamlesh Goel. 2002a. Bibliometric study of gender differences in

the field of psychology in India. Journal of Library & Information

Science 27 (1): 11 -23.

68. Kannaiyan, C.s., et al. 2001. Accountability in agricultural

education. Productivity 42 (2): 307-17

69. Kannappanavar, B. U. and Nulvi, C. N. 1991. Authorship trend

and solo research in Rural transformation: A bibliometric study.

ILA Bulletin 27(1) : 38-41

70. Karisiddappa, C. R., et al. 2002. Scientific productivity of authors

in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics 53 (1): 73- 93.

71. Kaur, Prabhjot and Dhaliwal, R.K.2008. A study of work output of

agricultural scientists of selected state agricultural universities of

t northern region. Journal ofInteracademicia 12(4): 548-552

72. Kawamura,M.et al.1999. Lotka's law and the pattern of scientific

productivity in the dental science literature. Medical Informatics

and Internet In Medicine 24(4): 309-315

http://search.ebscohost.com (accessed on 12.6.2009)

73. Kerala Agricultural University. 2001. Self study report for

accreditation. Thrissur, Kerala Agricultural University, 1.

237

74. Klaic, B. 1995. Analysis of the scientific productivity of

researchers from the Republic of Croatia for the period 1990 - 92.

Scientometrics 32 (2): 133 - 152.

75. Kaley, Susanta and Sen, B.K 2006. A bibliometric study of

Prof. B.N. Kaley, an eminent physiologist. Annals of Library and

Information Studies 53(2): 74-82.

76. Krampen, Gunter. 2008. The evaluation of university

departments andtheir scientists: Some general considerations with

reference to exemplary bibliometric publications and citation

analysis for a department of psychology. Scientometrics 76(1): 3-21.

77. Krauskopf, M. et al. 1995. Assessment of a university's scientific

capabilities and profile: The case of faculty of Biological science of

the Pontificia Universidad Catolica De Chile. Scientometrics 34 (1):

87 -100.

78. Kumbar, Mallinath and Akhtary, Syed. 1998. Bibliometric

analysis of Opthalmology literature. Library Science with aslant to

Documentation and Information Studies. 35(3): 201-07.

79. Kumbar, Mallinath et al. 2008. Growth and impact of research

output of University of Mysore 1999-2006: A case study. Annals of

Library and Information Studies. 55(3): 185-195.

80. Le Minor, S. and Dostani, P. 1991. Bibliometric study of the

French National Institute of Health and Medical Research

(INSERM). Scientometrics 22: 41- 63.

81. Lemoine, W. 1992. Distribution of research papers in CSIR.

Scientometrics 24: 450 - 457.

238

82. Lemoine, W. 1992. The frequency distribution of research papers

and patents according to sex: The case study of CSIR, India.

Scientometrics 24 (3): 449 - 469.

83. Maclean, J. and Janagap, C. 1993. The publication productivity

of international agricultural research centres. Scientometrics 28 (3):

329 - 48.

84. Mahapatra, R.K. and Jena, Padmanav. 2006. Scientific research

productivity on Orissa: A bibliometric analysis. Annals of Library

and Information Studies 53(1): 18-21.

85. Maheswarappa, BS and Mathias, S.A. 1988. Multiple authorship

and collaboration research in biological sciences in India: a

bibliometric study. Library Herald 27( %): 86-94.

86. Maheswarappa, B.S, et al. 1984. Collaborative research in science

and technology in India. Journal of Library and Information

Science 9 (2): 154-159.

87. Maheswarappa, B.S. and Mathias, S.A. 1987. Authorical

collaboration in various disciplines of the physical science in

India. A bibliometric study. Journal of Library and Information

Science 2 (2): 136-155

88. Maheswarappa, BS. and Mathias, S.A.1987 Research collaboration

in different disciplines of applied sciences in India (1965-1983).

IASLIC Bulletin 32 (3): 105-114.

89. Manjunath, L. et al. 2008. Determinants of scientific

productivity of agricultural scientists. Karnataka Journal of

Agricultural Science 21(3): 466-68.

90. Meadows, A.J. 1974. Communication in science. Butterworths.

239

91. Melin, Goran and Persson, Olle. 1998. Hotel Cosmopolitan: A

bibliometric study of collaboration at some European Universities.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (1): 43-48.

92. Mendiki, P.S. 2006. Order of authorship. Current Science 90: 1457.

93. Munnolli, Satish. S. and Kalyane, V. L. 2003. Scientometric

portrait of Ram Gopal Rastogi. Annals of Library & Information

Studies. 50 (1): 1 -17.

94. Nalini, J.K. 2003. Occupational health related publications in

India: a bibliometric analysis of journals. SRELS Journal of

Information Management 40(1): 41-50

95. Oliveira, Martins, et al. 1999, Conditional variables of the

scientific production process of the agricultural research centres of

Embrapa. Ciencia da Informacao 19 (1): 30 -39.

96. Parvathamma N. et al. 2008. T.M. Aminabhavi: a bibliometric

study. Annals ofLibrary and Information Studies 55(2): 127-134.

97. Parvathamma, N and Gobbur, Devendra,S. 2007. Mapping of

plastics literature(1999-2008): a bibliometric study. SRELS Journal

ofInformation Management 40(1): 41-50

98. Parvathamma, N. et al. 1993. Growth pattern of literature and

productivity of author in Indian earth science (1978 -88): A

bibliometric study. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation 30

(2): 54 -64.

99. Patel, Y.M. and Kumar, P.S.G. 1998. Pedological literature

analysis. Library Science with a slant to Documentation and

Information Studies. 35(2): 125-132.

100. Posner, R.A. 2001. Public intellectual: A study of decline.

Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

240

101. Pratap, Gangan and Gupta, B.M. 2009. Ranking of Indian

Engineering and technological institutes for their research

performance during 1999-2008. Current Science 97(3): 304-06.

102. Preman, P. K. 2001. Scientific productivity of scientists In

Regional Cancer Centre, Trivasndrum. M. Phil. Dissertation,

University of Kerala.

103. Price, D.J. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University

Press, London.

104. Price, De Solla.1963. Little science, big science. London, Columbia

University press.

105. Prpic, K. 2002. Gender and productivity differentials in science.

Scientometrics 55(1): 27-58.

106. Prpic, Katarina. 1994. The Socio-cognitive frameworks of

scientific productivity. Scientometrics 31(3): 293 - 311.

107. Prpic, Katarina. 1996 a. Characteristics and determinants of

eminent scientist's productivity. Scientometrics 36 (2): 186 - 206.

108. Prpic, Katarina. 1996. Scientific fields and eminent scientist's

productivity pattern and factors. Scientometrics 37 (3): 445 - 471.

109. Prpic, Katarina. 2000. The publication productivity of young

scientists: An empirical study. Scientometrics 49 (3): 453 - 490.

110. Rajendran, P. et a1..2005. Bibliometric analysis of fiber optics

literature. Annals afLibrary and Information Studies 52(3): 82-85

111. Ramaakrishana, N.V. 2009. Modelling the growth of ferrous metallurgy

literature:a study based on iron making and steel making. SRELS

Journal of Information Management 46 (4): 413-421

241

112. Ramakrishna, J and Ramesh Babu,B. 2007. Literature on hepatitis

(1984-2003): a bibliometric analysis. Annals of Library and

Information Studies. 54(4): 195-200

113. Ramakrishna, N. V and Pangannaya, N. B. 1999. Growth of

animals cell culture technology: A correlation between citations

and publications based on growth curves. Library Science with a

Slant to Documentation & Information Studies 36 (1) : 21 -26.

114. Ramesh, L.S.R.C.V., et al. bibliometric study. SRELS Journal of

Information Management. 37(3): 215-27.

115. Randhawa, M.s. 1963. Agricultural research in India:

Institutes and organizations. New Delhi, leAR.

116. Ranganathan, S.R. 1964. Classified catalogue code. 5th Ed. Asia

Publishing House, Bombay. P 126

117. RaviChandra Rao, I.K. 1980. The distribution of scientific productivity

and social change. Journal of the (imerican Society for Information Science

31 (2): 111-122.

118. Rey-Rocha, Jesus et al. 2002. Research productivity of

consolidated vs non-consolidated teams. The case of Spanish

University Geologists. Scientometrics 55 (1): 137 - 56.

119. Riikonen, pentti and Vihinen, Mauno.2008. National research

contribution: a case study on Finnish bio-medical research.

Scientometrics 77(2): 207-222

120. Sahu, J. R. 2000. National mapping of Science - India: Earth

Sciences.Information Today & Tomorrow 19 (3) : 17 -18

121. Sangam, S.L and Keshava. 2003. Growth pattern of literature in

the field of social science. SRELS journal of Information

Management 40 (1): 77-84

242

122. Sangam, S.L and Kiran,Savanur. 2006. Dr.N Rudraiah: a

bibliometric study. SRELS Journal of Information Management

43(2); 185-199

123. Sarala, K. R. 2004. Scientific productivity of agricultural scientists

in the College of Agriculture, Vellayani. M.Phil Dissertation.

University of Kerala.

124. Sarala, K.R. 1995. A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of

TropicalAgriculture. Library Science with a slant to Documentation

and Information Studies. 32 (4) : 165-171.

125. Sarala, K.R. 2004. Scientific Productivity of Agricultural Scientists

in the College of Agriculture, Thiruvananthapuram. M. Phil

dissertation. University of Kerala.

126. Satyanarayana, K. 2000. Mapping of Science - India:

Biomedical sciences Information Today & Tomorrow 19 (1) :17 - 21

127. Schloegl. Christian et al. 2003. Evaluating two Australian University

departments: Lessons learned. Scientometrics 56 (3): '2B7 - 299.

128. Scimago, Grupo. 2007. lSI productivity of the Spanish

Universities (2000-04). El Professional de la informacion 16(4):

354-58. http://web.ebscohost.com (accessed on 12-6-09)

129. Seglen, Pero, et al. 2000. Scientific productivity and group

size - A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological

research. Scientometrics 49 (1): 125 -143.

130. Senthilkumar P. and Amudavalli, A. 2007. A quantitative

analysis of the Spices Literature in India. Annals of Library and

Information Studies. 54(3): 152-57

243

131. Sevukan, R. et al.. 2007. Research output of faculties of Plant

Sciences in Central Universities in India: A bibliometric study.

Annals ofLibrary and Information Studies. 54(3): 129-39.

132. Shrum, Wesley. 1997. View from afar: "Visible" productivity of

scientists in the developing world. Scientometrics 40 (2): 215 - 235.

133. Singh, Yogendra et al. 2005. Research contributions and impact

of research of Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 1993 to

2001. Annals ofLibrary and Information Studies. 52(1): 8-14.

134. Sinha, S. C. and Furoquan Ullah. 1993. Eleven years of CBRI

research output, 1980-90. A bibliometric study. Annals of Library

and Documentation 40 (3) : 77 - 91.

135. Subbaiah Arunachalam and Rino, S. 1. 2004. Life science research

in India: A profile based on Biosis 1998. http://itt.nissat.tripod.

com/ittOl 04jbiorep.htm

136. Subbiah Arunachalam and Umarani, K. 2001. Mapping

agricultural research in India: A profile based on CAB Abstracts

1998.Cuurent Science 81 (8): 896 - 906.

137. Subramanyam, K. 1983. Bibliometric studies of research

collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science 6: 35-37.

138. Sudhier, K. G. 1997. Output of scientific research in Kerala:

A bibliometric analysis. Annals of Library Science and

Documentation 44 (4) :113 - 25.

139. Surendra Kumar and Kumar, S. 2004. Productometric study of

ICAR'S National Research Centre for Soybean (NRCS). Annals of

Library and Information Studies 51 (1) :11- 21.

140. Suresh Kumar. 2003. Ltoka's Law and author productivity in the field

of Computer Science in India. Library Herald 41 (2): 90 - 97.

244

141. Suriya, M. and Manimekalai, A. 1997. Research productivity of

the Academic community of the Marine Biological Center,

Annamalai University. Kelpro Bulletin 1 (1): 20 -26.

142. Surwase, Ganesh, et al. 2008. scientometric dimensions of pulsed

laser deposition research: a global perspective. Annals of Library

and Information Studies 55(2): 101-110

143. Tsay, Ming-Yueh, 2004. Literature growth, journal characteristics

and author productivity in subject Indexing 1977 - 2000. JASIST

55 (1): 64 - 73

144. Udofia, Udofia Hon. 2002. Bibliometric studies on African

Trypanosomiasic research literature: a research of authorship

pattern. Annals of Library and Information Studies 49 (2): 45-49.

145. Ulrich's Periodicals Directory. 2009. Ed. 47. ProQuest, New

Jersey.

146. Vanecek, Jiri. 2008. Bibliometric analysis of the Czech research

publications from 1994-2005. Scientometrics 77(2): 345-60.

147. Vijay, K.R.2005. Bibliometric study of research publication trends

among Indian Food Scientists and Technologists. Annals of

Library and Infoemation Studies 52(3): 77-81

148. Webster, Berenika, M. 2001. Polish women In science: a

bibliometric analysis of polish science and its publications, 1980 ­

99. Research Evaluation 10 (3): 185 -194.

149. Yesan, S. and Ally Sornam, S. 2001. A study on the factors

affecting school-ady productivity of faculty of Regional

Engeneering College (REC), Trichy. Kelpro Bulletin 5 (2): 10 -14.

245

150. Ying He and Gaun, Jiancheng. 2008. Contribution of Chinese

publications in computer science: A case study on LNCS.

Scientometrics 75(3): 519-34.

151. Zhou, Feng, et al. 2007. Scientometric analysis of geostatistics

using multi-variate methods. Scientometrics. 73(3): 265-270

152. Zipf, G.K. 1949. Human behaviour and the principle of least

effort. Reading Mass, Addison Wesley.

153. Zumelzu, E. 1997. Mainstream engineering publishing in Latin

America: The Chilean experience. Scientometrics 40 (1) 3 -12

•