書法藝術介入餐旅空間之研究 a study on the art of...

Post on 23-Jul-2018

214 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    1~22

    The Journal of Aesthetics and Visual Arts No. 6

    pp.1~22

    A Study on the Art of Calligraphy within the

    Hospitality Space

    Chun-Yi Lu

    ()

    Masters Student, Graduate Institute and Department of Visual and Media Arts at Nanhua

    University

    Tzong-Ho Yeh

    ()

    Associate Professor, Graduate Institute and Department of Visual and Media Arts at Nanhua

    University

    Abstract Calligraphy is inherent cultural symbol in Chinese, and also one of the most representative characteristics in

    the national spirit and art. With the change of the times, when the pen and ink encounter again, the words get rid

    of the exist restrictions of "symbol" , integrating into the modern spirit of thinking, developing the innovation in

    "calligraphy", finding the new definitions and exist value in the hospitality space, and also allowing viewers to

    enjoy the greater vitality of calligraphy.

    This study aims to explore the imagery thinking on the art of calligraphy within the hospitality space,

    through literature research, in-depth interviews and participant observation, analyzing with the hospitality space

  • 2

    planning on the issues of aesthetics, situation, cross-border and perceptions. Results showed that, the aesthetic

    images of calligraphic within the hospitality space, the operators- as- creators have different styles on their

    aesthetics context, will arouse viewers' resonation memories of life with, and consequently, producing the

    subjective and objective fusion in the aesthetic experience, condensing the image of space and Chinese

    calligraphy, constructing an interactive perceptions of cross-border dialogue.

    KeywordsChinese Calligraphy, Images, Hospitality Space

    1.

    1

    2

    Featherstone2000

    3

    1 2006 2 2 2008 20 3 2012 27

  • 3

    2.

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    3.

    (1)

    (2)

    1.

  • 4

    4

    //

    5

    ()

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Kant1724-1804

    10

    11

    12

    4 2006 3 5

    http://blog.xuite.net/crjpf/blog/7861429-%E5%AE%97%E7%99%BD%E8%8F%AF%E6%9B%B8%E6%B3%95%E7%BE%8E%E5%AD%B8%E

    4%B9%8B%E5%BE%8C%E8%A8%AD%E6%80%9D%E8%80%832014/04/26 6 1983 474 7 2008 154 8 1989 47 9 1982 15 10 1999 39 11 2002 78 12 -2010 200

  • 5

    2.

    Baumgarten1714-17621750

    ()()

    ()

    13

    ()

    ()

    ()

    14

    15

    16

    John Dewey1859-1952

    ()()

    ()

    17

    18

    Bernard Bosanquet1848-1923

    19

    13 19872 14 19935-7 15 13 52 16 19989 17 15 123 18 14 540-542 19 1985165-167

  • 6

    20

    3.

    21

    (1)

    (2)

    22

    (3)

    23

    1.

    (1)

    20 2002 471 21 --2007

    88 22 e --2002 11 23 2007 68

  • 7

    (2)

    (3)

    24

    (4)

    2.

    (1)

    a.

    b.

    c.

    24 Discovery

    2006 270-294

  • 8

    A1 A2

    A3

    d.

    (2)

    1

    1.

  • 9

    BermanEvans

    25

    1.

    26

    25 2003 33 26 2012 14

  • 10

    (1)

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    27

    27 -2013 9

    1.

  • 11

    Lnger Susanne, 1895-1982

    28

    (2)

    a.

    29

    30

    b.

    A1

    c.

    28 2003 78 29 2013 27 30 -2013 34

  • 12

    31

    32

    33

    d.

    2

    31 Willy Rotzler 1991 6 32

    2002 7 33 2006 46

    2.

  • 13

    2.

    (1)

    Sigmund Freud1856-1939

    Carl Gustav Jung1875-1961

    34

    35

    (2)

    36

    3 4

    37

    34 VirgilC.Aldrich 1991 173 35 -2002 33 36 2011

    43 37 http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/3/7/13/n342276.htm103/04/07

  • 14

    3.

    38

    38 2011

    3. - http://tw.twent.chinayes.com/Content/20111111/ke0d2eg4hul1g.shtml

    4. -

    http://www.trend.org/arts_info.php?pid=603

    5.

    6.

  • 15

    (1)

    a.

    ()

    ()

    ()

    7

    8

    b.

    8.

    7.

  • 16

    39

    40

    9 41

    (2)

    a.

    39 2012 13 40 2013 73 41 http://www.docin.com/p-99047749.html2014/04/12

    9.

  • 17

    42

    \

    43

    b.

    44

    45

    42

    2009 37 43 167 :2005 369 44 1997 73 45 2008 89

  • 18

    46

    2

    2.

    46 1987 44

  • 19

    47

    48

    49

    50

    47 -2005 20 48 95 49 Ellen Winner-1997 59 50 Gaston Bachelard 2003 224

  • 20

    1. -2005

    2. 1998

    3. 1987

    4. 2006

    5. 2002

    6. 167 :2005

    7. 2006

    8. 2008

    9. 1989

    10.1999

    11.2003

    12.1997

    13.1993

    14.1985

    15.1982

    16.1987

    17.2008

    18.-2010

    1. Ellen Winner -1997

    2. Gaston Bachelard 2003

    3. VirgilC.Aldrich 1991

    4. Willy Rotzler 1991

    1.

    1983

    2. 2008

    3. 2011

  • 21

    1.

    2012

    2.

    2002

    3. 2013

    4.

    2007

    5. --

    2007

    6. Discovery

    2006

    7. e --2002

    11

    8. 2013

    9.

    2003

    10.2012

    11.-2002

    12.-2013

    13.

    2011

    14.

    2009

    15.

    2012

    16.

    2002

    17. 2006

    18.-2013

    1. http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/3/7/13/n342276.htm

    2. http://www.docin.com/p-99047749.html

    3.

    http://blog.xuite.net/crjpf/blog/7861429-%E5%AE%97%E7%99%BD%E8%8F%AF%E6%9B%B8%E6%B3%95%

    E7%BE%8E%E5%AD%B8%E4%B9%8B%E5%BE%8C%E8%A8%AD%E6%80%9D%E8%80%83

top related