書法藝術介入餐旅空間之研究 a study on the art of...
TRANSCRIPT
-
1
1~22
The Journal of Aesthetics and Visual Arts No. 6
pp.1~22
A Study on the Art of Calligraphy within the
Hospitality Space
Chun-Yi Lu
()
Masters Student, Graduate Institute and Department of Visual and Media Arts at Nanhua
University
Tzong-Ho Yeh
()
Associate Professor, Graduate Institute and Department of Visual and Media Arts at Nanhua
University
Abstract Calligraphy is inherent cultural symbol in Chinese, and also one of the most representative characteristics in
the national spirit and art. With the change of the times, when the pen and ink encounter again, the words get rid
of the exist restrictions of "symbol" , integrating into the modern spirit of thinking, developing the innovation in
"calligraphy", finding the new definitions and exist value in the hospitality space, and also allowing viewers to
enjoy the greater vitality of calligraphy.
This study aims to explore the imagery thinking on the art of calligraphy within the hospitality space,
through literature research, in-depth interviews and participant observation, analyzing with the hospitality space
-
2
planning on the issues of aesthetics, situation, cross-border and perceptions. Results showed that, the aesthetic
images of calligraphic within the hospitality space, the operators- as- creators have different styles on their
aesthetics context, will arouse viewers' resonation memories of life with, and consequently, producing the
subjective and objective fusion in the aesthetic experience, condensing the image of space and Chinese
calligraphy, constructing an interactive perceptions of cross-border dialogue.
KeywordsChinese Calligraphy, Images, Hospitality Space
1.
1
2
Featherstone2000
3
1 2006 2 2 2008 20 3 2012 27
-
3
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
3.
(1)
(2)
1.
-
4
4
//
5
()
6
7
8
9
Kant1724-1804
10
11
12
4 2006 3 5
http://blog.xuite.net/crjpf/blog/7861429-%E5%AE%97%E7%99%BD%E8%8F%AF%E6%9B%B8%E6%B3%95%E7%BE%8E%E5%AD%B8%E
4%B9%8B%E5%BE%8C%E8%A8%AD%E6%80%9D%E8%80%832014/04/26 6 1983 474 7 2008 154 8 1989 47 9 1982 15 10 1999 39 11 2002 78 12 -2010 200
-
5
2.
Baumgarten1714-17621750
()()
()
13
()
()
()
14
15
16
John Dewey1859-1952
()()
()
17
18
Bernard Bosanquet1848-1923
19
13 19872 14 19935-7 15 13 52 16 19989 17 15 123 18 14 540-542 19 1985165-167
-
6
20
3.
21
(1)
(2)
22
(3)
23
1.
(1)
20 2002 471 21 --2007
88 22 e --2002 11 23 2007 68
-
7
(2)
(3)
24
(4)
2.
(1)
a.
b.
c.
24 Discovery
2006 270-294
-
8
A1 A2
A3
d.
(2)
1
1.
-
9
BermanEvans
25
1.
26
25 2003 33 26 2012 14
-
10
(1)
()
()
()
()
27
27 -2013 9
1.
-
11
Lnger Susanne, 1895-1982
28
(2)
a.
29
30
b.
A1
c.
28 2003 78 29 2013 27 30 -2013 34
-
12
31
32
33
d.
2
31 Willy Rotzler 1991 6 32
2002 7 33 2006 46
2.
-
13
2.
(1)
Sigmund Freud1856-1939
Carl Gustav Jung1875-1961
34
35
(2)
36
3 4
37
34 VirgilC.Aldrich 1991 173 35 -2002 33 36 2011
43 37 http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/3/7/13/n342276.htm103/04/07
-
14
3.
38
38 2011
3. - http://tw.twent.chinayes.com/Content/20111111/ke0d2eg4hul1g.shtml
4. -
http://www.trend.org/arts_info.php?pid=603
5.
6.
-
15
(1)
a.
()
()
()
7
8
b.
8.
7.
-
16
39
40
9 41
(2)
a.
39 2012 13 40 2013 73 41 http://www.docin.com/p-99047749.html2014/04/12
9.
-
17
42
\
43
b.
44
45
42
2009 37 43 167 :2005 369 44 1997 73 45 2008 89
-
18
46
2
2.
46 1987 44
-
19
47
48
49
50
47 -2005 20 48 95 49 Ellen Winner-1997 59 50 Gaston Bachelard 2003 224
-
20
1. -2005
2. 1998
3. 1987
4. 2006
5. 2002
6. 167 :2005
7. 2006
8. 2008
9. 1989
10.1999
11.2003
12.1997
13.1993
14.1985
15.1982
16.1987
17.2008
18.-2010
1. Ellen Winner -1997
2. Gaston Bachelard 2003
3. VirgilC.Aldrich 1991
4. Willy Rotzler 1991
1.
1983
2. 2008
3. 2011
-
21
1.
2012
2.
2002
3. 2013
4.
2007
5. --
2007
6. Discovery
2006
7. e --2002
11
8. 2013
9.
2003
10.2012
11.-2002
12.-2013
13.
2011
14.
2009
15.
2012
16.
2002
17. 2006
18.-2013
1. http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/3/7/13/n342276.htm
2. http://www.docin.com/p-99047749.html
3.
http://blog.xuite.net/crjpf/blog/7861429-%E5%AE%97%E7%99%BD%E8%8F%AF%E6%9B%B8%E6%B3%95%
E7%BE%8E%E5%AD%B8%E4%B9%8B%E5%BE%8C%E8%A8%AD%E6%80%9D%E8%80%83