alice abreu and francisco pilotti office of education, science and technology executive secretariat...
TRANSCRIPT
Alice Abreu and Francisco Pilotti
Office of Education, Science and Technology
Executive Secretariat for Integral Development (SEDI)
Second Meeting of the Working Groups of the IACML
Buenos Aires, 11 - 13 April, 2005
The Inter-American Cooperation Mechanism for Professional Labor Administration: The OAS Proposal
I. The Feasibility Study
II. The Social Network of Latin America and the Caribbean
III. CONARED – Knowledge Sharing and Advisory Network
IV. Lessons Learned
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
INDEX
I. The Feasibility StudyMechanism for the
Modernization of Labor Administration
•Background–Declaration of Salvador
•Regional Action based on horizontal cooperation•Feasibility Study
•Feasibility Study: Options–Inter-American Network for Labor Administration –Inter-American Centre for Labor A.
I. Feasibility StudyOptions from the Study:Network
–Portfolio of experiences–Comparative analysis of experiences–Dissemination of information, electronic means–Supply and Demand Matrix–Horizontal Cooperation Facilitator–Database–Cost: US$3.2 millons
Centre–All of the above, plus the following:–Identifies sources for resources–Technical assistance to assess needs–Designs and executes courses, seminars, interchanges–Cost: US$11.5 millons
I. The Feasibility Study
II. The Social Network of Latin America and the Caribbean
III. CONARED – Knowledge Sharing and Advisory Network
IV. Lessons Learned
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
INDEX
II. The Social Network
What is the Network?
•Origen: Tlaxcala, 1991•30 Countries - 34 Institutions (SIF)•Purpose: Horizontal Cooperation horizontal / fight against poverty
Structure of the Network•Annual Conference•Coordinating Committee•Technical Secretariat – OEST/OAS
II. The Social Network
Diversification Activities
Extra-Regional Relationships
Corporative Identity
Cooperation/Financing links
Seminars Course
Internships
Seminars Course
Internships
World Conferences
Other Networks
World Conferences
Other Networks
Publication on website
Publication on website
OAS: Institutional Strengthening ECLAC
World Bank: Information and Technology (InterRed) GTZ
IDB/INDES: Intr-Regional Internships Program EU
OAS: Institutional Strengthening ECLAC
World Bank: Information and Technology (InterRed) GTZ
IDB/INDES: Intr-Regional Internships Program EU
The Network: Consolidation
II. The Social NetworkHorizontal Cooperation in the framework of the Network: Results•11 Annual Conferences•30 seminars•140 Internships•1080 officers trained (10 years)•Publications•Web Site
II. The Social NetworkHorisontal Cooperation Models Horizontal: from Tianguis to the Virtual
Market•TIANGUIS
•Technical Secretariat as Focal Centre
•Virtual Network: WEBSITE
II. The Social Network
Tianguis: Direct Exchange Model
F1 F2 F3
F4 F5 F6
ST
II. The Social Network
The Technical Secretariat as Focal Centre: Indirect Exchange Model
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
ST
Supply and Demand Matrix
Supply and Demand Matrix
II. The Social Network
WEBSITE: Virtual Exchange Model
F1
F2
ST
F4
www.redsocial.org
Design
Hosting
Administration
Design
Hosting
Administration
II. The Social Network
Connectivity Modalities
•Face to Face Meetings•Videoconferences•Phone Conferences•Phone Messages •Electronic Mail•Electronic Conference•Fax
II. The Social Network
Social Network: A Complex Community
•It has members from more than one organization•High rotation of executives•Geographically dispersed, with different times•Members from different countries/cultures•Members that speak different languages•Not everybody has the same access to information and communication technologies
Challenges Identified I
•Evaluation–Individual–Work Position – multiplier effect–Institutional Management
•Participation–Internal–External
•Civil Society•Local Government•Researchers
II. The Social Netwrok
Challenges Identified II
•Management: From simple associations to complex networks
–Asymmetries –Statutes–Diversified budget and financing–Strategic role of members
II. The Social Network
Differences between the Feasibility Study and the Social Network Model
• Option: Network or Centre
• Vertical Management
• Beneficiaries• Financing donors• Does not take into
account legal aspects
• Costs: US$ 3-11mill
• Flexible Knowledge Network
• Co-management• Active participants• Co-financing• Role of OEST/OAS
– Executing Agency– Voluntary Fund
• Cost: US$ 750 mil
II. The Social Network
I. The Feasibility Study
II. The Social Network of Latin America and the Caribbean
III. CONARED – Knowledge Sharing and Advisory Network
IV. Lessons Learned
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
INDEX
Strategy and Objectives• This initiative seeks to identify, systematically
organize and share consolidated experiences among countries of the Hemisphere
• Simultaneously, it seeks to advise, accompany and communicate through virtual tools with and among those countries; as they critically transfer different experiences to their own contexts
• It opens a space for dialogue with all the actors involved in education: civil society, political body, international institutions and researchers
III. CONARED
The creation of this unique space within the OAS is proposed as an alternative to the traditional vision to review and jointly construct experiences and models. Under this model, all parties offer and receive experiences, understanding that all countries have something to share and something to learn from the other member States.
Sharing Knowledge in a horizontal mannerIII. CONARED
What do we want to overcome?
•Some experiences are better
•First you learn and then you apply what you learned
•Local knowledge is not relevant
•The benefit is only obtained in the final stage of the process
III. CONARED
An interchange methodology that implies that:
What approach do we apply?Relevant elements:
•A dialogue that results in something unique to the sum of its parts, that it feeds from theory and it is strengthened with the support of financing and technical institutions
•Political will and the catalyst for a permanent and direct dialogue
III. CONARED
Country 1
Country 2 Country 3
International Financing Institutions
Researchers Observatories
Evaluating Institutions CATALYST
What approach do we apply?Other Relevant Elements:
III. CONARED
•Information may be disseminated, but knowledge must be built
•It is a collaborative work that returns key knowledge to the enrichment of national initiatives
•Low Cost and High Return Mechanism which permanently links theory with practice
Country 1
Country 2 Country 3
International Financing Institutions
Researchers Observatories
Evaluating Institutions CATALYST
CONARED
III. CONARED
The Results
- More than 3 years implementing the strategy, which is permanently updated and adapted to the new demands from the Ministries
-8 Technical Cooperation Workshops
-28 countries actively participating
- Creation of a network of permanent advisors
-Construction of a permanent dialogue with all actors involved: videoconferences, on-line forums, on-site workshops
-Financial sustainability thanks to the support from the Work Bank and the contributions of the Technical Secretariat
III. CONARED
INDEX
I. The Feasibility Study
II. The Social Network of Latin America and the Caribbean
III. CONARED – Knowledge Sharing and Advisory Network
IV. Lessons Learned
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
What have we learned or reaffirmed about cooperation?
•All countries have valid lessons to share
•Horizontal Cooperation increases the capacity of the System to reflect and learn from each other experiences
•A genuine political will to share is as important as sharing itself
IV. Lessons Learned
What is a Knowledge Network?
•Group of people that share the same concern and set of problems, and who deepen their knowledge through continuous interaction.•Through this interaction: group learning, knitting relationships, sense of belonging and collective commitment•The members bring added value through the voluntary participation in the community
IV. Lessons Learned
Generation of Value
•Short term value – Solution of contingent problems•Long term value – Training and systematization of a knowledge base•Intangible value – Social capital•Strategic value – How can a community with its own identity initiate high quality collective projects for its members
IV. Lessons learned
Network and Development of Capacities
• Traditional– Professional Skills
– Technical and Analytical Tools
– Stress on acquired knowledge
– Increase individual capacity
• Networks– Institutional
Competence– Solution of Problems
and Implementation of Policies
– Stress on the link between knowledge and execution
– Increase sectoral capacity
IV. Lessons Learned
Added Value of the OAS Technical Secretariat
Legal AdvantagePolitical Advantage
Link between CIDI, Ministerials and SummitsBetter Connectivity
Installed CapacityNetwork of Networks
Economic AdvantageAnnual OAS subsidize: approx. US$30,000
Managerial AdvantageAdministration of Voluntary FundSecretariat of MeetingsHistoric Memory
Technical Advantage
IV. Lessons Learned
Horizontal Cooperation Strategy
•Connectivity
•Transference of Knowledge
•Network Management
IV. Lessons Learned
INDEX
I. The Feasibility Study
II. The Social Network of Latin America and the Caribbean
III. CONARED – Knowledge Sharing and Advisory Network
IV. Lessons Learned
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
The proposal is based on the accumulated experience of the OEST in:
1)The Social Network for Latin America and the Caribbean
2) CONARED
3) The Technical Secretariat of the IACML
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
Proposal: to create an Inter-American Network for Labor Administration (INLA), conceived as an integral mechanism that shares knowledge and relevant experiences for the strengthening and modernization of labor administration vis-à-vis the challenges of globalization
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
The INLA shall be administered by the OAS with the collaboration of ILO and in permanent coordination and communication with the Min. of Labor, COSATE and CEATAL, which shall comprise the basic core of the Network.
The INLA shall have some basic components, but its benefits are greater that those that can be achieved in each
component
Components of the Network:
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
I. Inter-Institutional Coordinating Committee
Participants: Authorities of the IACML (troika, and presidents and vice-presidents de WGs), COSATE, CEATAL and international organizations involved in the process.
The Coordination has two objectives: 1) to guarantee that there is no duplication of efforts and 2) to add initiatives and activities that could be harnessed in complementary ways
Objectives: define themes, establish concrete activities and responsibilities, set training possibilities and coordinate the different cooperation and technical assistance initiatives developed in the sub-regions of the Hemisphere.
II. Horizontal Cooperation Strategy
• Systematization of programs and projects Two tools developed: the Permanent Portfolio
of Consolidated Programs in the area of Labor and the Database of the USDOL/ILO project.
• Workshops and Seminars for critical transference
On-site workshops, bilateral or multilateral. Participation of officers, experts, researchers.
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
Components of the Network:
III. Interactive Portal
• Information Component:
• Cooperation Projects from international organizations – training courses.
• Interaction and Dialogue Component – Virtual Forum
• Financing sources and international contests to obtain resources.
• Researchers and experts’ database
• Programs from the Ministries of Labor
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
Components of the Network:
Preliminary Schedule of Activities:
Before the XIV IACML• Continuous updating of the IACML website• Design and support of the Virtual Forum• Updating the Portfolio of Consolidated Programs
Between the XIV and the XV IACML• Seminars to interchange experiences• Meetings of the Inter-Institutional Coordinating
Committee• Update of the IACML website and incorporation of
the database of the USDOL/ILO Project• Virtual Forums and Videoconferences• Update of the Portfolio of Consolidated Programs
and database of technical cooperation projects
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal
Financing:• OAS, in its capacity as administrator of the
Network, offers its physical infrastructure and the services of its staff. During the first phase of activities the OAS shall completely cover all costs.
• After the XIV IACML, the in-kind contribution of the OAS shall be complemented with financial support that may cover the costs of specific activities: workshops, meetings, videoconferences. Also ensure that a junior professional and an assistant are hired to permanent update the information and maintenance of the interactive Portal.
V. Outline of the OAS Proposal