ahmedabad mehsana toll road company limited · ahmedabad mehsana toll road company limited...

AHMEDABAD MEHSANA TOLL ROAD COMPANYLIMITED

AHMEDABAD-MEHASANA TOLL ROADPROJECT

IMPLEMENTABLE RESETTLEMENT

REHABILITATION ACTION PLAN

FILE COPYPrepared by:

Environment & Social Management Group,IL&FS, Mumbai

March 2001

1

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

22

Table of Contents

Chapter Page No.

1 Social Impacts of AMRP: Need for Detailed RAP and its 1Coverage

1.1 Background 11.2 Summary of Social Assessment conducted during 1

Feasibility Study1.3 Preparation of Implementable RAP 21.4 Present Status of RAP Implementation 3

2 Land Acquisition: Status, Extent and Impacts 42.1 Land Requirement for the Project 42.2 Status of Land Acquisition Proceedings 42.3 Compensation Rates 52.4 Impacts of Land Acquistion 142.4.1 Loss of Private Agricultural Land 142.4.2 Loss of Agricultural Income 152.4.3 Loss of Private Structures and Utilities 152.4.3 Loss of Community Structures and Utilities 162.5 Impact of RoW Clearance 162.5.1 Commercial Squatters 162.5.2 Residential Structures 162.5.3 Community Utilities and Structures 17

3 Entitlement Framework and the RAP 223.1 Introduction 223.2.1 Entitlement Framework - Basic Considerations 223.2.2 Definitions 233.3 Methodology to Determine Entitlement for a loss Category 233.4 Entitlement for Loss of Agricultural Lands 243.4.1 Determination of Replacement Value for Lands 243.4.2 Vulnerable Groups 253.4.3 Entitlement Package 253.5 Entitlement for Loss of Structures 273.6 Entitlement to Squatters within the RoW 283.7 Rehabilitation Action Plan 293.7.1 Rehabilitation Assistance for Loss of Agricultural Lands 29

and Income3.8 Rehabilitation Assistance for Loss of Assets 333.9 Institutional Framework 343.10 Time Frame 353.11 Monitoring of Implementation Progress 373.12 R&R Budget 37

2

33

Chapter One

SOCIAL IMPACTS OF AMRP: NEED FORDETAILED RAP AND ITS COVERAGE

1.1 Background

The Ahmedabad Mehasana Road Project (AMRP) comprises of improving andconstruction of SH 41 between Ahmedabad and Mehsana, in the state of Gujarat. Theproject road runs a total length of 51.6 kms. The proposed alignment starts from Km.19 near Adalaj and ends at 70.6 near the southern Municipal limit of Mehasana. Thissection of the highway is a major link between Ahmedabad City and the oil andindustrial town of Mehasana. Adalaj, Sertha, Kalol, Chhatral, and Nandesan are theprominent towns and villages along the main road.

The AMRP envisages widening and upgrading the existing 51.6-km of SH 41 to atwo-lane dual carriageway, with service roads on either side of the main road. Also a11.5 km long spur road will be constructed, which will commence from Chhatral onthe main road and run northwest to the town of Kadi. The road at Km. 22 passesthrough agricultural land and Sertha Village. Here the alignment is very poor with areverse curve within the village. The AMRP proposes to construct a 2.08 km long 60meter wide duel carriage way By-pass road to the west of Sertha village to take thetraffic out of the village. Hence, the implementation of the bypass at Sertha Villagewould entail acquisition of land.

The AMRP is being implemented on a Build, Operate, Own and Transfer (BOOT)format by a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) by the name and style of AhmedabadMehasana Toll Road Limited (AMTRL), a joint company, formed by TheInfrastructure Leasing and Financial Services (IL&FS) and the Government ofGujarat (GOG). The BOOT is a contractual arrangement whereby a project entity isauthorized to finance, construct, own, operate and maintain an infrastructure or afacility for a specific fixed franchise period. The project entity is allowed to recoverthe total investment and operation and maintenance costs plus a reasonable rate ofreturn through the collection of tolls/fees/rentals/user charges from the users of thefacility

1.2 Summary of Social Impacts Assessment Conducted during the Feasibility Study

During the planing stage a detailed Social Assessment' (SA) of the project wasundertaken along with the technical and environmental investigations. The objectiveof SA was to minimise the adverse social impacts in terms of number of ProjectAffected Persons (PAPs) as well as the intensity of the impacts; and to suggest

'Undertaken by Scott Wilson and Kirkpatrick India Pvt. Ltd. (August 1997)

3

44

mitigation measures by way of measures for restoring the socio-economic status ofthe PAPs. As a first step, the SA examined alternate alignments to bypass the existingcongested road sections that would cause significant negative impacts. As a result a2.08km bypass with a Right of Way (ROW) of 60m was proposed at Sertha village.

The salient features of the SA are summarised below:

* The project required acquisition of 11.27ha of land from 76 plots at villageSertha of which 9.54ha were privately owned agricultural lands belonging to 47landowner Project Affected Families (PAFs). The land acquisition also included1.73ha of Sertha grampanchayat and ONGC land

* 36 and 25 commercial squatters were identified within the ROW on theAhmedabad-Mehasana main project road and Chhatral-Kadi spur road,respectively. Since these squatters had setup their commercial activities inresponse to consumer demand from the highway and the adjoining industries, itwas felt that relocation of these structures would lead to loss of livelihood. TheSA recommended shifting of the squatters to the edge of ROW such that theirincome would not be affected. It was also proposed that the squatters would beprovided an assistance of Rs. 2000/- each towards the costs involved in shiftingand improving their appliances

* The total cost of mitigating the adverse social impacts due the project wasestimated at Rs. 19.47 million, which included a provision of Rs. 15.9 million forreplacement value of lands, Rs. 2.12 million towards cost of resettlement andrehabilitation and Rs. 1.45 million for hiring of NGO and Monitoring andEvaluation Agency

1.3 Objective of the Present Study

The preparation of implementable RAP under the present study was undertaken withthe onus of filling the gaps in the SA and update its findings. Specifically, the studyaimed at identification of all PAPs (100 per cent coverage) having interest inproperties and land to be acquired for the project and collection of recent socio-economic and other relevant data to facilitate development of RAP in consonancewith the SA recommendations. The overall assignment had the following sub-components:

* To obtain and record the final status of LA in the project area.* To confirm that all such notified plots of land optimally meet the project

requirements* To confirm through field surveys, discussions with villagers and their

representatives that all rightful owners and persons having interest in the saidland have been correctly identified and compensated; and highlight and details ofany disputed cases

* Determine the replacement value for the land acquired in project villages basedon the location, type and use of land and reach consensus with the PAPs oneconomic assistance in lieu of loss of land

4

55

* Based on data pertaining to post LA land holding, extent of loss, economic statusgrouping PAPs into relevant categories and developing the entitlement packagefor all PAPs to ensure restoration of their economic status within a stipulatedperiod and

* To prepare the Resettlement and Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP) for theproject, which will provide details of implementation strategy, time frame,budget, institutional framework for implementation and monitoring andevaluation, of the RAP

1.4 Present Status of RAP Implementation

At the time of submitting this report construction activity has begun along aconsiderable length of the project road. However, at this stage no commercialsquatters have been displaced. The government has completed the land acquisitionand lands have been transferred to AMTRL. AMTRL is in the process of disbursingthe rehabilitation and relocation assistance and is undertaking construction ofcommunity structures as detailed out in this document

5

66

Chapter Two

LAND ACQUISITION - STATUS, EXTENT AND IMPACTS

2.1 LAND REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT

The existing ROW of 60m is sufficient for construction and upgradation of theproject road, except at Sertha village where a bypass is proposed as an alternative.The bypass, which passes through2 72 revenue plots, would require a land area of12.1067 ha comprising predominantly private agricultural lands. Of the 72 plots, 65are private lands owned by 79 families and the rest of the plots belong to SerthaGrampanchayat, ONGC and Gandhinagar Collectorate. Table 2.1 gives the area oflands acquired for the bypass under various categories of ownership

L________ Table 2.1: Land Requirement DetailsLand Type Number of plots Area in hectares

Private Land 65 8.8557Government Land 1 0.1152ONGC Land 1 0.0168Pasture Land 2 0.6308Pond 2 1.9250Barren land 1 0.5800Total 72 12.1067

2.2 STATUS OF LAND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS AT SERTHA

The Roads & Buildings divisional Executive Engineer initiated the LA proceedingsby submitting the land plan schedules indicating the details of the land required toGandhinagar District LAO. The LAO initiated the proceedings with the publicationof notification u/s-4 (1) under the LA Act on July 28, 1997. The LA proceedingswere further processed u/s 6 and 9 between September 1997 and February 2000 andthe final award was declared during March 2000. Table 2.2, gives details of theprivate lands acquired from the titleholders named in the award list. However, land inrural areas is often passed on from one generation to the other without updating theland records. As a result, though the land is physically divided between inheritors thetitleholder in the award list maybe the ancestor or the eldest inheritor. Therefore,necessary care has been taken to also identify the inheritor and Project AffectedPerson/Family who actually possess and enjoy the land rights. The details in thisrespect are given in Table 2.2 column 4 and 5 respectively. The final award list isattached as Appendix 1

2 The lands acquired for the project marginally differ from those estimated at the time of SA andsummarized in the previous chapter

6

77

2.3 COMPENSATION RATES:

The compensation rates awarded by the Government of Gujarat for land acquired inthe village Sertha is based on the registered price of land in respective areas over thepast three years. Accordingly, the revenue department has declared compensation atthe rate of Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare for agricultural lands which including thesolatium at 30 per cent and the interest at 12 per cent per annum for 29 months on theland value since the date of notification under section 4(1) amounts to Rs.1,59,000per hectare

7

88

Table: 2.2 Title Holders, Project Affected Families and Their Land Details

Award Bolek No Title holders as per Inherited Share holders Project Affected Share holder Project Total Land Acquired Post L.A PercentageNo. Award List Declared Affected Land Holding Loss of Land

by GoG Famnily Holding HoldingReferenceNumber

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

1218 Somabhai Revabhai Kanti Soma Kantibhai 1 0.2021 0.1017 0.1005 50.3%

Govind Soma Govind Somabhai 2 0.2021 0.1017 0.1005 50.3%

Manilal Soma Mangabhai(Manilal) 3 0.2021 0.1017 0.1005 50.3%

2 1219/B Ramabhai Bababhai Ramabhai Bababhai Ramabhai Bababhai 4 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3%

DahyabhaiBababhai DahyabhaiBababhai Dayabhai 5 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3%

AtmaramBababhai AtmaramBababhai Kuwarben Girish(widow of 6 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3%Girish)

AmbaramBababhai AmbaramBababhai Atmarambhai 7 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3%

ShambhaiBababhai ShambhaiBababhai Shambhai 8 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3%

GirishbhaiBababhai GirishbhaiBababhai Ambarambhai 9 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3%

3 1717 Ratilal Ramdas Ratilal Ramdas Ratilalbhai 10 1.9373 0.9352 1.0021 48.3%

4 1731 Ramabhai Trikam Ramabhai Trikam Rambhai I1 0.7611 0.0845 0.6766 11.1%

Jagabhai Jagabhai Jagabhai 12 0.7611 0.0845 0.6766 11.1%

5 &14 1732(this belongs Baldevji Babarji Baldevji Babarji Baldevji Babarji 13 0.4181 0.0067 0.4114 1.6%

Nathaji)b Johaji Babarji Johaji Babarji Johaji Babarji 14 0.4181 0.0186 0.3995 4.4%

1734(common Jadiben Sambhuji Babarji Sambhuji Babarji 15 0.4181 0.0067 0.4114 1.6%land-share for all), Chanduji(Widow)1836(belongs to Sambhuji Babari Nathaji Dhanaji Nathaji Dhanaji 16 0.4181 0.1276 0.2906 30.5%

Johaji) Savitaben Jadiben Chanduji Jadiben Chanduji 17 0.4181 0.1276 0.2906 30.5%

Lalitaben

Rameshbhai

Vipulbhai

6 1733&1837 Shanaji Shankarji Shanaji Shankarji Shedajy Shankarji(son-Shanaji) 18 2.4595 0.2705 2.1890 11.0%

Gali Shankarji Gali Shankarji Chanaji's WidowChanaji's Widow

8

99

Award Boick No Title holders as per Inherited Share holders Project Atfected Share holder Project Total Land Acquired Post L.A PercentageNo. Award List Declared Affected Land Holding Loss of Land

by GoG Family Holding HoldingReferenceNumber

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

7 1738 Ambaram ishwarbhai Ambaram ishwarbhai Chandubhai Shamalbhai 19 0.2213 0.0238 0.1975 10.8%

Ranchhodbhai Shivdas Ranchhodbhai Shivdas

Keshubhai Jethidas Keshubhai Jethidas

Chaturbhai Motidas Chaturbhai Motidas

Ranchhodbhai Ranchhodbhai YohanbhaiYohanbhaiRameshbhai Rameshbhai ShamalbhaiShamalbhaiChandubhai Chandubhai Shamnalbhai

Nandubhai Nandubhai

8 1739 Monaben Varsangji Monaben Varsangji Maganji Vasangji(Son) 20 0.5945 0.2787 0.3158 46.9%Thakur Thakur(Mother)Manguben Manguben(Daughter)

Dahiben Dahiben(Daughter)

9 1740 Ataji Sursangi Thakur Ataji Sursangi Thakur Ataji Sursangi Thakur 21 2.2427 0.1166 2.1262 5.2%

Kalabhai Gandaji Kalabhai Gandaji(expired- Babiben Gandaji 22 2.2427 0.1166 2.1262 5.2%Babiben's son)

Mangabhai Gandaji Mangabhai Gandaji(Babiben's son)

Sitaben Gandaji Sitaben Gandaji(widow daughter of Babiben)

Babiben Gandaji Babiben Gandaji (Chuthaji Widow)Chuthajini Widow

10 1741 Fakirji Havjiji Thakur Fakirji Havjiji Thakur Fakirji Havjili Thakur 23 2.0929 0.2613 1.8316 12.5%

11 1746 Shanaji Shivaji Manaji Sokaji Thakur Keshaji Becharji 24 0.4162 0.0357 0.3805 8.6%

Jivanji Dayaji Shanaji Shivaji

CChanduji Sokaji Jivanji Gadaji

Galabji Sokaji Chanduji Sokaji

Manaji Sokaji Thakur Galabji Sokaji

Keshaji Becharji Keshaji Becharji

Dhonaji Becharji Dhonaji Becharji

9

1010

Award Bolek No Title holders as per Inherited Share holders Project Affected Share holder Project Total Land Acquired Post L.A PercentageNo. Award List Declared Affected Land Holding Loss of Land

by GoG Farily Holding HoldingReferenceNumber

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

12 1753 Bhothaji Hemaji(Son Bhothaji Hemaji(Son Ramaji Amaji Becharji 25 0.0357 0.0127 0.0230 35.6%Ramaji bothaji) bothaii)Masangji Visaji Gomati

Maganji Hothaji Mangaji

Baldevji Baberji Govindji

Jhuhaji Baberji Josna

Shambhuji baberji Sakriben Becharji

Nathaji

Chanduji Mathurji

13 1834 & 1839 Ramaji Bothaji(Son of Ramaji Bothaji(son of Ramaji Bothaji 26 0.2081 0.1245 0.0836 59.8%Bothaii) Manikben)Manekben Bothaji Manekben Bothaji Rupaben Somaji 27 0.2081 0.1245 0.0836 59.8%Thakur(widow of Thakur(widow of Bothaji)Bothaji)Veehaji somaji Khodidas Veehaji(son of Veehaji Somaji)(Expired)Ishwar Rupaben SomajiVeehaji(expired)Rupaben Somaji Dashrath Somaji

Dashrath Somaji Nathiben - Somajibhai

Nathiben - Somajibhai Sakariben becharji Thakur

Sakariben becharji Amaji BecharjiThakurAmaji Becharji Lilaben Becharji

Lilaben Becharji Sitaben Becharji

Sitaben Becharji

14 1836 Dhudji Masangji Covered UJnder Award Number 14

15 1842 Shankarbhai Hirabhai Shankarbhai Hirabhai Babubbai Narayanbhai(Jiviben 28 0.1888 0.0287 0.1601 15.2%stays at his residence)

Ishwarbhi Narayanbhai lshwarbhi Narayanbhai Iswarbhai 29 0.1888 0.0287 0.1601 15.2%

10

1111

Award Boick No Title holders as per Inherited Share holders Project Affected Share holder Project Total Land Acquired Post L.A PercentageNo. Award List Declared Affected Land Holding Loss of Land

by GoG Family Holding IIoldingReferenceNumber

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Savitaben SavitabenNarayanbhai Baldevbhai 30 0.1888 0.0287 0.1601 15.2%

BabubhaiNarayanbhai BabubhaiNarayanbhai Savitaben 31 0.1888 0.0287 0.1601 15.2%

BaldevbahiNarayanbha BaldevbahiNarayanbhaii.JivibenNarayanbhai(wi JivibenNarayanbhai(Narayanbhai's widow)dow of Narayanbhai)

16 1843 Natavarbhai Natavarbhai Karshanbhai Natwarbhai Karsanbhai 32 1.1772 0.1650 1.0122 14.0%Karshanbhai

17 1844 Baldevbhai Baldevbhai Atmaramdas Baldevbhai Atmaramdas 33 3.4865 0.1656 3.3209 4.7%Atmaramdas

18 1845 Baldevji Somnath Baldevji Somnath Popatbhai Ambabhai 34 0.2466 0.0172 0.2294 7.0%

Popatlal Ambalal Popatlal Ambalal Baldevbhai Somnath 35 0.2466 0.0172 0.2294 7.0%X

19&27 1887&1900 Chandulal Jesangbhai Chandulal Jesangbhai Chandulal Jesangbhai 36 0.6422 0.2048 0.4374 31.9%

20&25 1888,1897&1943 Dashrathbhai Dashrathbhai Shankarbhari Sidharajbhai 37 2.4973 0.2146 2.2827 8.6%ShankarbhariSiddhrajbhai Siddhrajbhai Dasradhbhai 38 2.4973 0.2146 2.2827 8.6%

21 1889 Parvatiben Maneklal Parvatiben Manekial Parvatiben(widow of Maneklal) 39 1.8193 0.1562 1.6631 8.6%

Harshadkumar Harshadkumar Maneklal(Son)ManeklalRavindrakumar Ravindrakumar Maneklal(son)ManeklalJyotsnaben Manilal Jyotsnaben Manilal Vani(Married Daughter)VaniMandakiniben Mandakiniben (Married Daughter)Maneklal

22 1890&1899 Ambalal Madhavdas Ambalal Madhavdas Ambalal Madhavadas 40 3.0411 0.2419 2.7992 8.0%

23 1892 Prahaladas Aatmaram Prahaladas Aatmaram Pralhadbhai Atmaram 41 3.3536 0.2640 3.0896 7.9%

24 1893 Ambalal Aatmaram Ambalal Aatmaram- Keshavlal Ambalal(nephew) 42 0.2260 0.0195 0.2065 8.6%Keshavlal Ambalal

Govind Aatmaram Govind Aatmaram

25 Covered under the award number 20

26 1898 Rajendrakumar Ratilal |Rajendrakumar Ratilal(Son) Sitaben Ratilal 43 2.1523 0.0500 2.1023 2.3%

11

1212

Award Bolck No Title holders as per Inherited Share holders Project Affected Share holder Project Total Land Acquired Post L.A PercentageNo. Award List Declared Affected Land Holding Loss of Land

by GoG Family Holding HoldingReferenceNumber

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Surendra Kumar Surendra Kumar Ratilal(son)RatilalSitaben Ratilal Sitaben Ratilal(Widow Mother)

27 1900 C J Patel covered under 19

28 1901 Naranbhai Babubhai Naranbhai Babubhai Naranbhai Babubhai 44 1.8075 0.1775 1.6300 9.8%

29 & 32 1944,1948&1950 Sitaben Gordhanbhai Sitaben Gordhanbhai Jaswantbhai 45 0.7016 0.4686 0.2330 66.8%

Jaswantbhai Jaswantbhai RamanhbhaiRamanhbhaiMaheshbhai Maheshbhai RamanbhaiRamanbhaiRenukaben Ramanbhai Renukaben Ramanbhai

30 1945 Vadibhai Jesangbhai Vadibhai Jesangbhai Vadilal Jesangbhai 46 0.5235 0.1846 0.3389 35.3%

31 1946,1951&1984 Aatmaram Sakabhai Aatmaram Sakabhai Aatmaram Sakabhai 47 2.6637 0.5650 2.0987 21.2%

Nathiben Nathiben VithalbhaiVithalbhai(Widow ofvittalbhai)Kanubhai Vithalbhai Kanubhai Vithalbhai

Shankarbhai Vittalbhai Shankarbhai Vittalbhai

Ganptbhai Vittalbhai Ganpatbhai Lalbhai

Vikrambhai Vittalbhai Vikrambhai Vittalbhai

32 Covered under Award Number 29

33 1949 Baldevbhai Ambalal Baldevbhai Ambalal Baldevbhai Ambalal 48 3.8993 0.1271 3.772 3.25%

34 1953 Somabhai Somabhai Bhaichandbhai This land is given to School 49 1.9260 0.0014 1.9246 0.072%BhaichandbhaiRanchhodbhai Ranchhodbhai MenabenMenabenShertha Keravani Shertha Keravani MandalMandalHiraben Mangalbhai Hiraben Mangalbhai

Shardaben Ambalal Shardaben Ambalal PatelPatel

12

1313

Award Bolck No Title holders as per Inherited Share holders Project Affected Share holder Project Total Land Acquired Post L.A PercentageNo. Award List Declared Affected Land Holding Loss of Land

by GoG Farnily Holding HoldingReferenceNuniber

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Lilaben Lilaben Champaben

Champaben Ketanben Govindbhai

Ketanben Parsotamdas(mantri Shertha Keravani mandal)GovindbhaiParsotamdas(mantri Shertha Keravani mandal)

35 1972 Kanubhai Vittalbhai Kanubhai Vittalbhai Kanubhai Vittalbhai 50 1.8273 0.0037 1.8236 0.2%

Shankarbhai Shankarbhai Vithalbahi Shankarbhai 51 1.8273 0.0037 1.8236 0.2%Vithalbahi Vittalbhai&GanpathbhaiVikrambhai Vikrambhai Vikrambhai Vithal 52 1.8273 0.0037 1.8236 0.2%

Ganpatbhai Ganpatbhai

Nathiben Nathiben

36 1973 Labhshankar Labhshankar Manishankar Somnath 53 2.1592 0.0180 2.1412 0.8%

Manishankar Somnath Manishankar

Natvarlal Natvarlal

Parsotam Parsotam

Manekial Manekial

Bipinchandra Bipinchandra

37 1974,1974/B Parsotam Kishorbhai Parsotam Kishorbhai Parsotam Kishorbhai 54 1.3556 0.2056 1.1500 15.2%

Surajben Surajben Kantibhai (widow)

Kantibhai Bhagyeshbhai Kantibhai (Son of Kantibhai)

Bhagyeshbhai Kantibhai

38 1975 Sureshbhai Amrutbhai Sureshbhai Amrutbhai(son) Sureshbhai Amrutbhai 55 1.0585 0.0060 1.0525 0.6%

Manubhai Amrutbhai Manubhai Amrutbhai(Son)

Puriben Puriben(Mother)

39 1985 Ishwarbhai Kashibhai Manubhai Manubhai Ishwarbhai 56 2.8980 0.0460 2.8520 1.6%Ishwarbhai(lswarbhai's Son)

Baldevbhai Kashibhai Kantaben (Iswarbahi's Shankarbhai Kashibhai 57 0.7245 0.0460 0.6785 6.3%widow)

13

1414

Award Boick No Title holders as per Inherited Share holders Project Affected Share holder Project Total Land Acquired Post L.A PercentageNo. Award List Declared Affected Land Holding Loss of Land

by GoG Fanily Holding HoldingReferenceNumber

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Ramanbhai Kashibhai Baldevbhai Kashibhai Ramanbhai Kashibhai(mother 58 1.4490 0.0460 1.4030 3.2%stays with him)

Shankarbhai Kashibhai Ramanbhai Kashibhai

Rewaben (Kashibhai's Shankarbhai KashibhaiWidow)

Rewaben

40 1986 Narayanbhai Ramabhai Narayanbhai Ramabhai Narayanbhai Ramabhai 59 2.8065 0.0034 2.8031 0.1%

41 1991 Baldevbhai Ambalal Baldevbhai Ambalal Baldevbhai Ambalal 60 8.2160 0.0504 8.1656 0.6%

42 1995 Dwarkadas Dwarkadas Manohardas Dwarkabhai 61 1.9740 0.0436 1.9304 2.2%ManohardasLaxmiben Laxmiben Bhudar Premilaben 62 1.9740 0.0436 1.9304 2.2%Bhudar(widow)lshwarbhai Bhudarbhai Ramabhai Budharbhai Laxmiben 63 1.3160 0.0436 1.2724 3.3%

Shankarbhai Budarbhai Shankarbhai Budarbhai

Ramabhai Budharbhai Nilamkumar (Son)

Nilaykumar Iswarbhai Rajalben (Ishwarbhai's Daughter)

Samaben Prameelaben Ishwarbhai (Widow)

Natwarbhai

Prameelaben

43 1996 Revaben Ambaram Revaben Ambaram(Mother) Revaben Ambaram 64 0.2497 0.0025 0.2472 1.0%

Narayanbhai Ambaram Narayanbhai Ambaram(Son)

Vishnubhai Vishnubhai(Son)

44 1992 Somabhai Jevarbhai Somabhai Jevarbhai Somabhai 65 5.3155 0.2027 5.1128 3.8%

45 2032/A,2038/B&2 Amrutbhai Mangaldas Amrutbhai Mangaldas Amrutbhai 66 1.4778 0.059 1.4183 4.0%

092 Parsotambhai Parsotambhai Mangaldas Dayabhai 67 1.4778 0.059 1.4183 4.0%

Dahyabhai Dahyabhai Mangaldas Puriben (Widow of Parsotambhai) 68 1.4778 0.059 1.4183 4.0%

46 2033 Kantaben (Bachubhai Kantaben (Bachubhai 's Anilbhai Bachubhai 69 3.1987 0.0420 3.1567 1.3%'s widow) widow)Anilkumar Bachubhai Anilkumar Bachubhai(Son)

14

1515

Award Boick No Title holders as per Inherited Share holders Project Affected Share holder Project Total Land Acquired Post L.A PercentageNo. Award List Declared Affected Land llolding Loss of Land

by GoG Family Holding IloldingReferenceNumber

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Geetaben Geetaben (Married Daughter)

Shaileshbhai Shaileshbhai(Son)Bachubhai

47 2036,2089&1993 Navnitbhai Laljibhai Navnitbhai Laljibhai(Son) Shardaben Laljibhai(Stays with 70 3.6468 0.2236 3.4232 6.1%___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ N avnit)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Sailesh Laljibhai Sailesh Laljibhai(Son) Shaileshkumar 71 1.8234 0.1118 1.7116 6.1%

Shardaben Laljibhai Shardaben Laljibhai(Widow of Laljibhai)

48&49 2039&2040 Laljibhai Ambaram Laljibhai Ambaram Anritbhai mangaldas 72 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2%

Kalidas Kalidas Ranchhodbhai Laxmiben Ratilal 73 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2%RanchhodbhaiDhana Fakir Dhabhai Fakirbhai Dhana Fakir 74 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2%

Prabhudas Motilal Prabhudas Motibhai Kantaben Bachubhai(widow) 75 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2%

Ratilal Ambaram Laxmiben Ratilal(widow of Hasmukhbhai Somnath 76 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2%Ratilal)

Soma Mulji Somnath Muljibhai

Amrutbhai Mangaldas Amrutbhai Mangaldas

Parshottambhai Parsotamdas

Dayabhai Dahayabhai

50 2090&2041 Kantibhai Hirabhai Kantibhai H-irabhai Kantibhai Hirabhai 77 1.6767 0.6106 1.0661 36.4%

51 1994 Natwar Hira Natwar Hira Nathubhai 78 1.8430 0.1763 1.6667 9.6%

52 1994 Dhunabhai Hirabhai Dhunabhai Hirabhai Dhunabhai Hirabhai 79 1.7481 0.0779 1.6702 4.5%

Total No. of PAFs 79 8.8553 ha of private land acquired

15

1616

2.4 IMPACTS OF LAND ACQUISITION

2.4.1 Loss of Private Agricultural Land

Total private agricultural land being acquired due to this project is 8.8553 hacomprising of 65 plots, affecting 79 families3. As a first step of the exercise, thesocio- economic data of the PAFs was analysed to identify PAFs who are primarilydependent on agriculture. The observations are presented in Table 2.5. Out of 79families, 2 families do not reside at Sertha or in nearby villages. This indicates thattheir livelihood is not affected by land acquisition. The impact of LA for the projecton the PAFs has been evaluated using two criteria. The first criterion is based on acomparison of pre and post land holdings, with respect to Minimum EconomicLandholding (MEL4 ). The PAFs were classified based on their pre and postlandholding sizes. The aim being to identify no. of families which move to a lowerclassification as a result of LA. The distribution of PAFs under the differentcategories is given in Tables 2.3

Table 2.3: Impact on Size of Landholding Due to Land Acquisition*

Size of Number of PAFsLandholding Pre LA Post LA

>2MEL 20 18MEL - 2MEL 20 22

<MEL 39 39

* LA for the project does not result in increased number of PAFs having post LAland holding less than the Minimum Economic Landholding (MEL), consideredto be the most vulnerable group. However, a large number of PAFs having preLA landholding less than MEL have also lost land, and these families will requireeconomic rehabilitation for restoration of their income

* There is no significant increase (pre LA-20 and post LA-22) in number offamilies having post LA holding between MEL and 2 times the MEL.

The second criterion is based on the percentage of loss in size of landholding of eachPAF due to LA. The details are presented in Table 2.4

3One of the plots of land being acquired belongs to Sertha school4MEL: Minimum Economic landholding is the size of plot that enables the cultivator to maintain an economical status just abovepoverty line. The MEL in the project site is estimated as IHa of irrigated land or 2Hla. of unirrigated land (average expenses andincome from agricultural activities is presented in Appendix 2).

16

1717

Table 2.4: Percentage Loss in Size of Landholdin2s

% age loss in size of Total PAFsLandholding Number %age

<5 % 26 32.95% to 15% 33 41.715% to 25% 6 7.725% to 50% 8 10.0>50% 6 7.7

* From the above tables it is evident that majority of the PAFs (57 of 79) lose lessthan 15% of their land holding. Specific technical interventions can make goodfor the loss by increasing agricultural productivity. Real loss of agriculturalincome is therefore limited to approximately 25% of the families affected by theproject

2.4.2 Loss of Agricultural Income:

There could be an economic impact on a family due to the land acquisition, as thelands are agricultural lands and agriculture is a traditional source of income orlivelihood in this village. Paddy is gROWn as kharif crop and wheat/ mustard as arabi crop. Agricultural income has been estimated as Rs. 40,000/ha/year for PAFsowning irrigation sources, tractor and gROWing three crops per year and Rs.30,000/ha/year for PAFs not owning irrigation sources, tractor and gROWing two cropsper year. The details for the estimates have been presented in Appendix-2. The extentof impact would depend on the size of the pre LA land holding as well as the landarea acquired for the project. The socio-economic details presented in Table 2.5reveal that with respect to loss in agricultural income

* One PAF suffers an agricultural income loss of more than Rs.25,000 (PAF no.10), however LA does not render this PAF vulnerable as his post LA income isestimated to be above twice poverty line (2PL)

* Three PAFs will suffer loss of agricultural income in the range of Rs. 15000 - Rs.25,000 (PAF no.s 45, 47 and 77). Of these PAF nos. 45 and 47 are not renderedvulnerable and retain income levels above 2PL after LA.

2.4.3 Loss of Private Structures and Utilities

The land acquisition for the bypass will affect three irrigation wells and onefarmhouse with a small temple. The irrigation wells are defunct and are not used bythe farmers. The farmhouse made of brick work in mud is currently used for storingfarm implements and as a cattle shed, which has been acquired, and GoG has paid Rs.58,080. A small temple is also located within the farmhouse which will bereconstructed by AMTRL. However, the livelihood of the farmhouse owner, Shanaji

17

1818

Shankarji, listed under block no. 1733 will not be affected due to LA, as the landacquired is a marginal area of 0.2705ha out of 2.4595ha.

2.4.4 Loss of Community Structures and Utilities

A community cattle drinking water trough and a marginal part of the village watertank (open) will be affected due to LA. The proposed bypass will also sever the twoof the village cart tracks

2.5 IMPACT OF ROW CLEARANCE

2.5.1 Commercial Squatters

The current 60m ROW of the road is sufficient for construction of the project.However, 36 and 23 commercial squatters have been identified (during SA)5 withinthe ROW of the main road and the spur road, respectively. The list of these structuresis presented as Appendix 3

These are temporary wooden structures comprising of tea-stalls, vegetable vending,cigarette shops, automobile repair shops and set up in response to the consumerdemand from highway traffic and the adjoining industries. The space occupied bythese squatters on an average is about 50sqft and in no instance exceeds 100sqft. Theowners of these structures will lose the source of their income if these structures areremoved without appropriate rehabilitation

It was observed that since the time of undertaking the SA in 1997, in a few sectionsof the road, commercial development had taken place. This has led to an increase innumber of commercial squatters within these stretches. Whereas, most of the roadlength did not attract such commercial activities and no new commercial squatterswere observed. Since considerable time has passed from the date of documentation ofcommercial squatters in the SA, it has been decided to update the list of commercialsquatters, just prior to physical relocation necessary for road construction andconsider them as PAFs

2.5.2 Residential Structures

The clearing of ROW will affect 13 residential structures encroaching into the ROWand 4 residential squatters located within the ROW. The list of these structures arepresented in Appendix 4. The ROW clearance will render squatters homeless,necessitating relocation. However, the residences encroaching the ROW will not besignificantly affected as only a small portion of the structures encroaching the ROWwill be demolished.

5These numbers are as on August 1997, as recorded in the final detailed feasibility oreport by theconsultants - Scot Wilson.

18

1919

2.5.3 Community Utilities and Structures

The community structures and utilities that need to be relocated as part of ROWclearance includes shifting of 16 temples, five roadside drinking water posts, threetoilet blocks and 15 bus stops.

19

2020

Table 2.5 Socio-Economic Status of PAFs due to Land A(iuisition

Award PAF no. Head of Project Affected Family Size Total Land Acquired Post LA %Loss of Loss of Post LA Post LA non Total Income Per Capita Post LA economicNo. Family Landholding landholding Landholding agricultural Agricultural agricultural after LA Income per status

income post LA Income in Rs. income AnnuminRs (12)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (I 1) (13)(14)

1 Kantibhai 2 0.2021 0.1017 0.1005 50.3% 3050 3014 120000 123014 61507 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

2 Govind Somabhai 6 0.2021 0.1017 0.1005 50.3% 3050 3014 36000 39014 6502 Partially Vulnerable(l-I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~______2PL)

3 Mangabhai(Manilal) 4 0.2021 0.1017 0.1005 50.3% 3050 3014 60000 63014 15754 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

2 4 Ramabhai Bababhai 6 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3% Nil Nil 120000 120000 20000 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

5 Dayabhai i 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3% Nil Nil 79200 79200 7200 Not Vulnerable(1-2PL)

6 Kuwarben Girish(widow 4 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3% Nil Nil 9600 9600 2400 Vulnerable(<PL)of Girish)

7 Atmarambhai 5 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3% Nil Nil 84000 84000 16800 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

8 Shambhai 7 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3% Nil Nil 132000 132000 18857 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

9 Ambarambhai 6 0.1130 0.0117 0.1013 10.3% Nil Nil 156000 156000 26000 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

3 10 Ratilalbhai 7 1.9373 0.9352 1.0021 48.3% 28086 30063 100000 130063 18580 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

4 _1 Rambhai 7 0.7611 0.0845 0.6766 11.1% 2280 20298 61200 81498 11643 Not Vulnerable(1-2PL)

12 Jagabhai 4 0.7611 0.0845 0.6766 11.1% 2280 20298 9600 29898 7475 Not Vulnerable(1-2PL)

5 &14 13 Baldevji Babarji 4 0.4181 0.0067 0.4114 1.6% 201 12343 190000 202343 50586 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

14 Johaji Babarji 5 0.4181 0.0186 0.3995 4.4% 552 11986 32400 44386 8877 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

15 Sambhuji Babarji 2 0.4181 0.0067 0.4114 1.6% 201 12343 9000 21343 10671 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

16 Nathaji Dhanaji 3 0.4181 0.1276 0.2906 30.5% 3826 8717 50400 59117 19706 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

17 Jadiben Chanduji 6 0.4181 0.1276 0.2906 30.5% 3826 8717 41700 50417 8403 Partially Vulnerable(1-______________ _________________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2PL)

6 18 Shedajy Shankarji(son- 12 2.4595 0.2705 2.1890 11.0% 8117 65670 201000 266670 22223 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)______ ~Shanaji)__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

7 19 Chandubhai Shamalbhai 4 0.2213 0.0238 0.1975 10.8% 718 5926 54000 59926 14981 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

8 20 Maganji Vasangji 6 0.5945 0.2787 0.3158 46.9% 11157 12632 75000 87632 14605 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

9 21 Ataji Sursangi Thakur 7 2.2427 0.1166 2.1262 5.2% 3499 63785 30000 93785 13398 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

22 Babiben Gandaji 6 2.2427 0.1166 2.1262 5.2% 3499 63785 9000 72785 12131 NotVulnerable(>2PL)

20

2121


income post LA Income in Rs, income AnnuminRs (12)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (13)(14)

10 23 Faldrji Havjiji Thakur 8 2.0929 0.2613 1.8316 12.5% 7849 54948 63000 117948 14744 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

I11 24 Keshaji Becharji 13 0.4162 0.0357 0.3805 8.6% 1074 11415 70000 81415 6263 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

12 25 Amaji Becharji 6 0.0357 0.0127 0.0230 35.6% 382 690 28800 29490 4915 Vulnerable(<PL)

13 26 Ramaji Bothaji 6 0.2081 0.1245 0.0836 59.8% 3729 2507 70000 72507 12085 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

27 Rupaben Somaji 3 0.2081 0.1245 0.0836 59.8% 3729 2507 9600 12107 4036 Vulnerable(<PL)

15 28 Babubhai Narayanbhai 5 0.1888 0.0287 0.1601 15.2% 861 4803 39000 43803 8761 Partially Vulnerable(l-I9 Iswarbhai 0.1888 0.0287 2PL)

29 Iswarbhai 4 0.1888 0.0287 0.1601 15.2% 861 4803 33000 37803 9451 Partially Vulnerable(l-___________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2PL)

30 Baldevbhai 3 0.1888 0.0287 0.1601 15.2% 861 4803 18000 22803 7601 Partially Vulnerable(1-2PL)

31 Savitaben 4 0.1888 0.0287 0.1601 15.2% 861 4803 30000 34803 8701 Partially Vulnerable(l-2PL)

16 32 Natwarbhai Karsanbhai 10 1.1772 0.1650 1.0122 14.0% 4943 30366 81000 111366 11137 Not Vulnerable(l -2PL)

17 33 Baldevbhai Atmaramdas 5 3.4865 0.1656 3.3209 4.7% 6551 132836 0 132836 26567 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

18 34 Popatbhai Ambabhai 3 0.2466 0.0172 0.2294 7.0% 7400 6882 15000 21882 7294 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

35 Baldevbhai Somnath 9 0.2466 0.0172 0.2294 7.0% 7400 6882 72000 78882 8765 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

19&27 36 Chandulal Jesangbhai 13 0.6422 0.2048 0.4374 31.9% 6147 13122 200000 213122 16394 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

20&25 37 Sidharajbhai 5 2.4973 0.2146 2.2827 8.6% 8591 91308 9000 100308 20062 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

38 Dasradhbhai 4 2.4973 0.2146 2.2827 8.6% 8591 91308 75000 166308 41577 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

21 39 Parvatiben (widow of 9 1.8193 0.1562 1.6631 8.6% 4695 49893 96000 145893 16210 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)M anekial)__ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

22 40 Ambalal Madhavadas 7 3.0411 0.2419 2.7992 8.0% 7302 83976 18000 101976 14568 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

23 41 Pralhadbhai Atmaram 11 3.3536 0.2640 3.0896 7.9% 7950 92688 25000 117688 10699 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

24 42 Keshavlal Ambalal 9 0.2260 0.0195 0.2065 8.6% 777 8258 36600 44858 4984 Vulnerable(<PL)

26 43 Sitaben Ratilal 8 2.1523 0.0500 2.1023 2.3% 1484 63069 28800 91869 11484 Not Vuinerable(I-2PL)

28 44 Naranbhai Babubhai 7 1.8075 0.1775 1.6300 9.8% 5312.8 48900 36000 84900 12129 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

29 & 32 45 Jaswantbhai 8 0.7016 0.4686 0.2330 66.8% 18752 9320 126000 135320 16915 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

30 46 Vadilal Jesangbhai 6 0.5235 0.1846 0.3389 35.3% 5547 10167 48000 58167 9695 Partially Vulnerable(l-.__ _ _ _ __________ ____________ __________ ____________ __________ ___________ __________ __________ 2PL )

21

2222



(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (I1) (13)(14)

31 47 Aatmaram Sakabhai 9 2.6637 0.5650 2.0987 21.2% 16938 62960 120000 182960 20329 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

33 48 Baldevbhai Ambalal 14 3.8993 0.1271 3.7722 3.3% 3862 113166 20000 133166 9512 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

34 49 This land has been given DNA 1.9260 0.0014 1.9246 0.1% Nil Long back, this land was given to Shertha School by the PAF Vulnerable(<PL)to a School _______without title transfer

35 50 Kanubhai Vittalbhai 5 1.8273 0.0037 1.8236 0.2% 110 54708 48000 102708 20542 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

51 Shankarbhai 1 1.8273 0.0037 1.8236 0.2% 110 54708 27000 81708 7428 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)_____ Vittalbhai&Ganpathbhai _

52 Vikrambhai Vithal 5 1.8273 0.0037 1.8236 0.2% 110 54708 27000 81708 16342 Not Vulnerable(>2PLI)

36 53 Manishankar Somnath 5 2.1592 0.0180 2.1412 0.8% 518 64236 81600 145836 29167 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

37 54 Parsotam Kishorbhai 13 1.3556 0.2056 1.1500 15.2% 6184 34500 144000 178500 13731 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

38 55 Sureshbhai Amrutbhai 9 1.0585 0.0060 1.0525 0.6% 191 31575 54600 86175 9575 Not Vulnerable(1-2PL)

39 56 Manubhai Ishwarbhai 5 2.8980 0.0460 2.8520 1.6% 1391 85560 37200 122760 24552 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

57 Shankarbhai Kashibhai 5 0.7245 0.0460 0.6785 6.3% 1369 20355 84000 104355 20871 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

58 Ramanbhai Kashibhai 6 1.4490 0.0460 1.4030 3.2% 1391 42090 96000 138090 23015 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)(mother stays with him)

40 59 Narayanbhai Ramabbai 10 2.8065 0.0034 2.8031 0.1% 84 84093 0 84093 8409 Not Vulnerable(I -2PL)

41 60 Baldevbhai Ambalal DNA 8.2160 0.0504 8.1656 0.6% 1478 244968 DNA Refused to DNA Not Vulnerable(>2PL)_____________

0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~rovide Detais

42 61 Dwarkabhai 6 1.9740 0.0436 1.9304 2.2% 1737 77217 600000 677217 112870 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

62 Premilaben 1.9740 0.0436 1.9304 2.2% 1737 77217 33000 110217 27554 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

63 Laxmiben 5 1.3160 0.0436 1.2724 3.3% 1830 50897 45000 95897 19179 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

43 64 Revahen Ambaram 7 0.2497 0.0025 0.2472 1.0% 75 7416 48000 55416 7917 Not Vulnerable(1-2PL)

44 65 Somabhai 6 5.3155 0.2027 5.1128 3.8% 6059 153384 36000 189384 31564 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

45 66 Amrutbhai 15 1.4778 0.059 1.4183 4.0% 1773 42550 66000 108550 7237 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

67 Dayabhai 5 1.4778 0.059 1.4183 4.0% 1773 42550 9000 51550 10310 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

68 Puriben (Widow of 5 1.4778 0.059 1.4183 4.0% 1773 42550 27000 69550 13910 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)______ Parsotambhai)

46 69 Anilbhai Bachubhai 8 3.1987 0.0420 3.1567 1.3% 1247 94701 123600 218301 27288 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

47 70 Shardaben Laljibhai 4 3.6468 0.2236 3.4232 6.1% 6671 102696 9000 111696 27924 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)(stays with Navnit) .

22

2323

Award PAF no. Head of Project Affected Family SiZe Total Land Acquired Post LA %Loss of Loss of Post LA Post LA non Total Income Per Capita Post LA economicNo. Family Landholding landholding Landholding agricultural Agricultural agricultural after LA Income per status


(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (I 1) (13)______ _______ ______________________ _____________ ___________ (14)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(14

71 Shaileshkumar 4 1.8234 0.1118 1.7116 6.1% 3336 51348 23400 74748 18687 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

48&49 72 Amritbhai Mangaldas 14 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2% 986 17972 84000 101972 7284 Not Vulnerable(I-2PL)

73 Laxmiben Ratilal 9 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2% 986 17972 9000 26972 2997 Vulnerable(<PL)

74 Dhana Fakir 7 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2% 986 17972 39000 56972 8139 Not Vulnerable(l-2PL)

75 Kantaben Bachubhai 14 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2% 986 17972 129000 146972 10498 Not Vulnerable(1-2PL)(widow)

76 Hasmukhbhai Somnath 10 0.63220 0.0331 0.5991 5.2% 986 17972 33000 50972 5097 Vulnerable(<PL)

50 77 Kantibhai Hirabhai 5 1.6767 0.6106 1.0661 36.4% 18147 31983 18000 49983 9997 Partially Vulnerable(1-

51 78 Nathubhai 6 1.8430 0.1763 1.6667 9.6% 7078 66668 9000 75668 12611 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

52 79 Dhunabhai Hirabhai 8 1.7481 0.0779 1.6702 4.5% 3148 66808 48000 114808 14351 Not Vulnerable(>2PL)

23

2424

Chapter Three

ENTITLEMENT FRAMEWORK AND THE RAP

3.1 Introduction

AMTRL's E&S policy for R&R is based on the Environmental and Social Report ofIL&FS, and follows the three principles

(i) Prevent adverse social situation(ii) Mitigate possible adverse social impacts; and(iii) Enhance the quality of life in and around the project

The Social Assessment (SA), which was undertaken with an aim to minimise theimpact of the project on the PAFs, examined alternate alignments to bypasscongested road sections. Therefore, the first principle was taken into considerationduring the SA itself. The present study carried out with an aim to develop animplementable RAP takes into account the second and third principle of the ESR, bydetailing out the rehabilitation assistance measures entitled to each PAF and theinstitutional arrangements and mechanisms that will ensure timely and effectiveimplementation of the R&R related activities

3.2.1 Entitlement Framework - Basic Considerations

As a result of land acquisition, the affected population is subjected to a range ofsocio-economic impacts. Most significantly affected families are those, who lose allor a considerable portion of their assets to the project. Rehabilitation by way ofphysical replacement of the assets may be the only effective means of compensatingsuch families. The families that lose only partial assets may be able to continue theirpresent occupation albeit with diminished income. The mitigation measures for suchfamilies will involve an assessment of their losses and provision for timely andadequate compensation to overcome the losses

The form of assistance should also depend upon the extent of loss; and economic andsocial vulnerability of the PAFs. The PAFs, who retain a substantial part of theirassets after the LA and who have a demonstrable capacity to invest moneyproductively, can be compensated by one time payment of cash. In the rest of thecases, the mitigation measures need to strike a balance between immediate and long-term needs of the PAFs. This can be achieved by providing a cash compensation forpartially replacing the lost assets, a maintenance allowance to provide relief forimmediate loss of income and a compensation by way of income generating scheme(IGS) and training to rebuild the lost earning capacity of the PAF. The actualmechanism and amount of resettlement and rehabilitation assistance for the PAFs isdetermined by way of developing a family level entitlement package that accounts forthe losses suffered by the family as well as its ability to make effective use of theassistance

24

2525

The entitlement framework also needs to be sensitive to the special needs andlimitations of squatter families. If not adequately provided for these families could beworst affected by the project as they are solely dependent on the economicopportunities near the area of their settlement and project induced displacementleaves them with very limited opportunities for restoring their income.

3.2.2 Definitions

Project Affected Person

Project Affected Person (PAP) under the current project assignment refers to everyperson affected by the project implementation through acquisition of land and/orother properties.

In the context of this assignment for the Sertha By-pass Road component of theProject, the following may be the possible categories of PAPs/ PAFs:

(i) Who lose agricultural land(ii) whose livelihood/trade/occupation is affected(iii) who lose access to common property / resources(iv) others found / reported as affected by the project

The Cut -Off Date

For identification of PAPs and determining their entitlement for lands and assetsfalling on newly acquired lands for the project, the date of 4(1) notification, i.e. July28, 1997 will be deemed as the cut-off date.

For identification of squatter PAPs owning commercial or other structures within thepreviously existing ROW of 60m, a fresh survey will be under taken just prior to thebeginning of construction, while implementing the RAP and the date of such surveywill be deemed as the cut-off date. Following this survey regular monitoring ofproject ROW will be undertaken by the SPV, inorder to control further inflow ofsquatters within the ROW

3.3 Methodology to Determine Entitlement for a Loss Category

The objective of the RAP is to ensure that the socio-economic status of PAFs ismaintained or improved. The desired improvement in income levels is especiallyrelevant in case of below poverty line6 (BPL) PAFs. However, it is also importantthat the level of assistance is equitable and does not cause resentment among thePAFs due to perceived discrimination.

6 For this report the poverty line has been pegged at Rs 30,000/- for a fanily size of 5.

25

2626

The entitlement of the PAFs, therefore, is determined by identifying the applicablecategory of losses, estimating their quantum and assessing the potential socio-economic impact due to the loss. The level and mechanism of assistance by way ofcompensation (monetary and in kind) is then decided to ensure that the incomerestoration/enhancement objectives of RAP are achieved. The following sectionpresents the reasoning and the entitlement framework developed for differentcategories of losses suffered by the PAFs due to acquisition of property and assetsby the project

3.4. Entitlement for Loss of Agricultural Lands

The 'land for land' option for PAFs having valid title or customary or usufruct rightfor their acquired land is considered as the most appropriate way to compensate theagricultural PAFs. However, unavailability of surplus agricultural land in theproject village makes this option difficult to implement. Also the small plotsacquired from individuals PAFs cannot be replaced due to lack of contiguous landsto supplement the land lost and purchase of such small plots at different placeswould not be economically viable. In such case compensating for the loss of land atreplacement value is considered appropriate and is acceptable to the PAFs

3.4.1 Determination of Replacement Value for Lands

It is generally observed that the registered values for the lands are lower thantheir replacement values. As a result, the compensation rates determined by thegovernment based on the registration value are also lower than the replacementvalue. The PAFs, therefore, do not get adequate compensation to replace theirlost assets.

Since the lands have already been acquired by the government and compensationpaid, for adequate replacement of their assets the project provides the differencebetween the replacement value and the government compensation, asRehabilitation Assistance (RA) to PAFs. The payment of RA to PAFs willhowever be subject to handing over the lands to the Project Company, free fromany title litigation and court cases against the award by LAO.

With the objective of determining replacement value, an informal survey wasconducted to collect information on land prices in the bypass area. Sertha Talati,Sarpanch, sellers and buyer in the vicinity were contacted for this purpose.During the survey it was observed that there was only a single transaction in thepast two years in Sertha village. However, the prices in the nearby villagesprovided the Project Authority a general idea of prevailing land prices andvariations thereof. *

The PAFs were consulted through series of Public Information and Consultationsto reach a consensus on replacement value of land. After extensive discussions

26

2727

with the PAFs, a final value of Rs. 8,50,000/- per hectare 7was arrived at asreplacement cost of the land. The photographs of the PICs held in Sertha areincluded as Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2. As an outcome of the deliberations, thepeople agreed to withdraw the court cases as a pre-condition to receiving theRehabilitation Assistance (RA) from the Project Company

3.4.2 Vulnerable Groups

The PAFs below poverty line (pre as well as post LA), women headed familiesand families with physically or mentally handicapped members have beenconsidered as vulnerable group of PAFs. These PAFs need to be provided with aspecial guidance to use the RA effectively to establish a suitable IncomeGeneration Activity (IGA) that brings the family above poverty line. Theexperience of implementing the IGAs shows that for success of such schemesmotivated participation of PAFs is necessary.

In order to generate wholehearted support from the PAFs, an incentivemechanism by way of a financial reward on achieving the target incomegeneration has been built in IGA implementation. The reward will be capital costof IGA, up to a ceiling of a pre-determined amount on successfully achieving thetarget income level of selected IGA. Also the vulnerable PAFs shall be providedwith maintenance allowance per month during the first year of IGA operation.

3.4.3 Entitlement Package

Considering the above guiding principles and the severity of impacts due to landacquisition, the entitlement package has been determined taking in to account thepercentage loss of landholdings and post-LA income levels. While determiningthe entitlement package the following two categories have been considered

1. The loss of landholdings up to 15% is considered as minor loss, whereagricultural interventions can make good for the loss by increasing agriculturalproductivity. In such cases, Rehabilitation Assistance (RA) in cash plusguidance for improved agricultural produce will be provided. In case of thePAFs who are below PL under this category will be provided with IncomeGenerating Activities (IGA) to generate one fourth the PL income.

2. In cases where loss of landholdings is above 15 % the agriculturalinterventions cannot offset the income from loss of productive land. The PAFs

7 Rs. 1,59,000/- per hectare has already been paid by the government as part of the LA procedure.Therefore, the Rehabilitation Assistance per hectare works out to Rs. 6,91,000/-

27

2828

under this category are further classified as: (i) PAFs with income above 2PL (ii)PAFs having income between 1 and 2PL and (iii) the PAFs whose income levelsare below poverty line. While the PAFs under category (i) will be provided withRA in cash, the PAFs in category (ii) and (iii) will be provided with IGAsgenerating one fourth and half the PL incomes respectively

The IGAs for the eligible PAFs will be provided using part or full amount of RA.The implementation of IGA will also have a provision for an incentive to PAFsto run the IGAs diligently. Accordingly, an amount, not exceeding the cost ofIGA or Rs2O,000/-for PAFs being provided with IGA generating one half the PL,and not exceeding Rs. 10,000/- for PAFs being provided with IGA generating onefourth the PL will be reimbursed to the PAFs on achieving targetted performanceof IGAs. The incentive will be paid in two installments over three years if thefamily runs the IGA successfully, earning the projected income levels. In case ofbelow PL PAFs, an additional maintenance allowance per month per family willbe paid for an year, by which time the income flow from IGA is expected tostabilise

The summary of entitlement package is presented in Table 3.1

28

2929

Table 3.1: Entitlement Package

X % Loss in Post Acquisition Post L.A Income Entitlement PackageCategory Size of Land Land Holding from all sources

Holding

>MEL >PL Rehabilitation Assistance in Cash + technicalguidance and other interventions are visualisedto increase the productivity of land

>PL Rehabilitation Assistance in Cash + technicalguidance and other interventions are visualisedto increase the productivity of land"

<PL Provision of Income Generation Activity (IGA)1 <15% using part or full amount of Rehabilitation

Assistance (RA remaining after providing IGA will<MEL be paid in cash) to generate PL4 income +

Maintenance allowance for an year @ Rs. 350/-per family per month for an year. Also as anincentive, an amount equal to IGA and notexceeding Rs 10000/- will be paid in twoinstallments in three years if the family runs theIGA successfully, earning the projected incomelevels

>2MEL >2PL Rehabilitation Assistance in Cash

>2PL Rehabilitation Assistance in Cash

>1 PL <2PL Provision of Income Generation Activity (IGA)using part or full amount of RehabilitationAssistance (RA remaining after providing IGA will

Between 1 to 2 be paid in cash) to generate PLU4 income. AlsoMEL as an incentive, an amount equal to cost of IGA

and not exceeding Rsl 0000/- will be paid in twoinstallments in three years, if the family runs theIGA successfully, earning the projected income

2____>1___________ levels.2 >15% >1 PL <2PL Entitlement as above

<PL Provision of Income Generation Activity (IGA)using part or full amount of RehabilitationAssistance (RA remaining after providing IGA willbe paid in cash) to generate PLU2 income +

<MEL Maintenance allowance for an year @ Rs. 700/-per family per month for an year. Also as anincentive, an amount equal to cost of IGA andnot exceeding Rs 20000/- will be paid in twoinstallments in three years if the family runs theIGA successfully, earning the projected incomelevels

3.5 Entitlement for Loss of Structures

Private: The land acquisition for the bypass will affect two irrigation wells and onefarmhouse with a small temple. The irrigation wells are defunct and are not used by

the farmers. A small temple is also located within the farmhouse. The cost of the farm

house has been paid by the Revenue department. The owner of the structure has

opted for replacement of the temple

8 From agricultural experts, it is understood that up to 15% of loss of agricultural land, specific technicalinterventions can make good for the loss by way of increasing productivity from agriculture

29

3030

Community: A community cattle drinking water trough and a marginal part of thevillage water tank, will be affected due to LA The extent and impact of the loss willbe evaluated with the help of an engineer and alternative solutions will be made goodby the Project Company.

3.6 Entitlement to Squatters Within the Row

Commercial Squatters: 59 commercial squatters were identified to be within theROW of the main road and the spur road, respectively at the time of SA. Since thenan increase of such squatters in a few road stretches which have attracted significantcommercial development has been observed. Informal observations indicate that suchincrease will not be more than double the numbers observed during the DFIBR study.These commercial ventures have been set up in response to the consumer demandfrom highway traffic and the adjoining industries. Removal of these structures wouldlead to economic loss to the families dependent on these commercial activities.

An informal interaction in this regard with the squatters revealed that that thesquatters prefer self-relocation option in the nearby place with necessary shiftingallowance from the company. Considering this observation, it is proposed to providea self-relocation measure, where, market value of the land occupied by the squatter;in addition, shifting allowance will be paid. The maximum assistance for self-relocation is estimated9 at Rs.5000/- In case if the structures are beyond theformation width of the project road, the structure will be allowed to continue

However, in some cases where the lands outside the ROW are occupied by industriesor commercial sector, it may not be possible self-relocation by the commercialsquatters in the visinity of their original location. In such case, it is possible that theincome from the business is impacted over a transitional period. In such cases it maybe necessary to provide a rehabilitation assistance to the squatters on the case to casebasis. The exact measures for such assistance will be determined during the RAPimplementation. The expenditure towards this head is expected to be marginal andwill be met from R&R contingency

Residential Structures: The clearing of ROW will affect 13 residential structuresencroaching ontothe ROW and 4 residential squatters located within the ROW atKalol. The residences encroaching the ROW will not be significantly affected asonly a small portion of the structures encroaching the ROW will be demolished. Theresidences have considerable area behind the structures for expansion. Also theowners have agreed for demolition of the encroached part of the structure, onpayment of the actual value of the demolished structure. In case of residentialsquatters, the affected families opted for self-relocation on payment of compensationfor the structures currently occupied by them. The compensation for these squatterPAFs will be paid once they identify structures for self-relocation. The names of the

9 The maximum area of the squatter is about lOi2, cost of land is assumed to be three times the marketvalue at Sertha village, i.e. Rs. 250/- per Sq.mtr. and an additional allowance up to Rs. 2500/- is consideredfor shifting and improving their tools of the trade

30

3131

residential PAFs and the compensation value of the respective structures is presentedin Appendix 4

Community Utilities and Structures: The community structures and utilities thatneed to be relocated as part of ROW clearance includes shifting of 16 temples, 5roadside drinking water posts, and 15 bus stops. The following measures are planned:

* Temples: 3 of the 16 temples are personal temples while the rest are communityowned. Discussions held with the focus groups revealed that the people wouldprefer to shift the temple as per the village customs with assistance from thecompany. Therefore, it is proposed that the Project Company will provideconstruction material and cash assistance for relocation

* Bus Stands: All these bus stands have been taken into consideration in thedesigning of the project road configuration and bus bays have been provided with

* Drinking Water Stand Posts, Hand Pumps and Toilet Blocks: 5 drinkingwater posts and three toilet blocks need to be relocated as part clearance offormation width for construction of road. The public utilities will be shiftedoutside the RoW of the project road

3.7 Rehabilitation Action Plan

Based on the above discussions the following are the RAP components for thisproject.

1. Rehabilitation Assistance for loss of agricultural lands and income2. Identification of vulnerable families and provisions for

* Income generation schemes3. Rehabilitation assistance for loss of assets

* Private* Community

4. Rehabilitation for loss caused due to ROW clearance* Commercial Squatters* Community structures

The above have been detailed out in the following section

3.7.1 Rehabilitation Assistance for Loss of Agricultural Lands and Income:

The landowning PAFs are to be compensated at the replacement value of their lands.This objective of RAP is achieved by adding a rehabilitation assistance to thecompensation paid by the government. A provision has been made to assure thatPAFs all together receive an amount of Rs. 8,50,000 per ha of land acquired which isconsidered as appropriate compensation by the PAFs for their loss of agriculturallands. The detailed family-wise entitlement towards this head is presented in Table3.2. A budgetary provision of Rs. 61,19,289/- has been made to meet this expenditure

31

3232

Table 3.2: Family wise Rehabilitation Assistance Towards Loss of Land

Award PAF no. Head of Project Affected Family Size %Loss of Post LA economic RehabilitalonNo. Family Landholding status Assistance

(7)(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

(6)1 1 Kantibhai 2 50.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 70253

2 Govind Somabbai 6 50.3% Partially Vulnerable(l- 702532PL)

3 Mangabhai(Manilal) 4 50.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 70253

2 4 Ramabhai Bababhai 6 10.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 8062

5 Dayabhai 11 10.3% Not Vulnerable(I-2PL) 8062

6 Kuwarben Girish(widow 4 10.3% Vulnerable(<PL) 8062of Girish)

7 Atmarambhai 5 10.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 8062

8 Shambhai 7 10.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 8062

9 Ambarambhai 6 10.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 8062

3 10 Ratilalbhai 7 48.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 646234

4 it Rambhai 7 11.1% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 58391

12 Jagabhai 4 11.1% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 58391

5 &14 13 Baldevji Babarji 4 1.6% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 4644

14 Johaji Babarji 5 4.4% Not Vulnerable(I-2PL) 12853

15 Sambhuji Babarji 2 1.6% Not Vulnerable(I-2PL) 4644

16 Nathaji Dhanaji 3 30.5% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 88152

17 Jadiben Chanduji 6 30.5% Partially Vulnerable(l- 88152_____ ______ __________ ~~~ ~~~2PL)

6 18 Shedajy Shankarji(son- 12 11.0% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 186919Shanaji)

7 19 Chandubhai Shamalbhai 4 10.8% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 16446

8 20 Maganji Vasangji 6 46.9% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 192585

9 21 Ataji Sursangi Thakur 7 5.2% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 80537

22 Babiben Gandaji 6 5.2% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 80537

10 23 Fakirji Havjiji Thakur 8 12.5% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 180561

11 24 Keshaji Becharji 13 8.6% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 24669

12 25 Amaji Becharji 6 35.6% Vulnerable(<PL) 8776

13 26 Ramaji Bothaji 6 59.8% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 86031

27 Rupaben Somaji 3 59.8% Vulnerable(<PL) 86031

15 28 Babubhai Narayanbhai 5 15.2% Partially Vulnerable(I- 19815___________________ ~~~2PL)

29 Iswarbhai 4 15.2% Partially Vulnerable(I - 19815___________________ ~~~2PL)_ _ _ _ _ _ _

30 Baldevbhai 3 15.2% Partially Vulnerable(I- 198152PL)

31 Savitaben 4 15.2% Partially Vulnerable(l- 198152PL)

16 32 Natwarbhai Karsanbhai 10 14.0% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 114017

17 33 Baldevbhai Atmaramdas 5 4.7% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 114432

18 34 Popatbhai Ambabhai 3 7.0% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 11885

35 Baldevbhai Somnath 9 7.0% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 11885

19&27 36 Chandulal Jesangbhai 13 31.9% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 141519

32

3333

Award PAF no. Head of Project Affected Family Size %Loss of Post LA economic RehabilitaionNo. Family Landholding status Assistance

(7)(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

(6)20&25 37 Sidharajbhai 5 8.6% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 148257

38 Dasradhbhai 4 8.6% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 148257

21 39 Parvatiben (widow of 9 8.6% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 107936Manekial)

22 40 Ambalal Madhavadas 7 8.0% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 167156

23 41 Pralhadbhai Atmaram 11 7.9% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 182427

24 42 Keshavlal Ambalal 9 8.6% Vulnerable(<PL) 13475

26 43 Sitaben Ratilal 8 2.3% Not Vulnerable(I-2PL) 34551

28 44 Naranbhai Babubhai 7 9.8% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 122655

29 & 32 45 Jaswantbhai 8 66.8% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 323808

30 46 Vadilal Jesangbhai 6 35.3% Partially Vulnerable(l- 1275612PL)

31 47 Aatmaram Sakabhai 9 21.2% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 390422

33 48 Baldevbhai Ambalal 14 3.3% Not Vulnerable(I-2PL) 87828

| 34 | 49 This land has been given DNA 0.1%

to a School|35 50 |Kanubhai Vittalbhai 5 | 0.2% 1NOt Vulnerable(>2PL) 2557

| | 51 |Shankarbhai l 11 | 0.2% |Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 2557Vittalbhai&Ganpathbhai __!_!

52 Vikrambhai Vithal 5 0.2% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 2557

36 53 Manishankar Somnath 5 0.8% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 12438

37 54 Parsotam Kishorbhai 13 15.2% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 142072

38 55 Sureshbhai Amrutbhai 9 0.6% Not Vulnerable(I -2PL) 4146

39 56 Manubhai Ishwarbhai 5 1.6% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 31787

57 Shankarbhai Kashibhai 5 6.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 31787

58 Ramanbhai Kashibhai 6 3.2% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 31787(mother stays with him)

40 59 Narayanbhai Ramabhai 10 0.1% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 2349

41 60 Baldevbhai Ambalal DNA 0.6% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 34827

42 61 Dwarkabhai 6 2.2% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 30105

62 Premilaben 4 2.2% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 30105

63 Laxmiben 5 3.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 30105

43 64 Revaben Ambaram 7 1.0% Not Vulnerable(I -2PL) 1728

44 65 Somabbal 6 3.8% Not Vu]nerable(>2PL) 140068

45 66 Amrutbhai 15 4.0% Not Vulnerable(D-2PL) 41092

67 Dayabhai 5 4.0% Not Vulnerable(I-2PL) 41092

68 Puriben (Widow of 5 4.0% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 41092Parsotambhai)

46 69 Anilbhai Bachubhai 8 1.3% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 29023

47 70 Shardaben Laljibhai 4 6.1% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 154510(stays with Navnit)

71 Shaileshkumar 4 6.1% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 77255

48&49 72 Amritbhai Mangaldas 14 5.2% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 22900

73 Laxmiben Ratilal 9 5.2% Vulnerable(<PL) 22900

74 Dhana Fakir 7 5.2% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 22900

33

3434

Award PAF no. Head of Project Affected Family Size %Loss of Post LA economic RehabilitaionNo. Family Landholding status Assistance

(7)(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

(6) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

75 Kantaben Bachubhai 14 5.2% Not Vulnerable(1-2PL) 22900(widow)

76 Hasmukhbhai Somnath 10 5.2% Vulnerable(<PL) 22900

50 77 Kantibhai Hirabhai 5 36.4% Partially Vulnerable(l- 4219322PL)

51 78 Nathubhai 6 9.6% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 121825

52 79 Dhunabhai Hirabhai 8 4.5% Not Vulnerable(>2PL) 53830

The socio-economic survey's findings have been further analyzed to determine thevulnerable families. The following are the salient observations and recommendationsin this context

* 55 PAFs who lose less than 15% of their land holding and are above poverty line.These PAFs will be provided with RA in cash and specific guidance for improvedagricultural practices.

* 4 PAFs losing less than 15% of their land holding, and having post LA incomebelow PL have been considered as vulnerable, and will be provided with IGAusing part or full amount of RA to generate PL4 income. These PAFs will beprovided with maintenance allowance for a year @ Rs. 350/family per month

* 8 PAFs losing more than 15 % of their land holding, and having post LA income,between 1-2 PL will be provided with IGA using part or full amount of RA togenerate PL/4 income.

* 1 PAF losing more than 15% of their landholding, and having post LA incomebelow PL will be provided with IGA using part or full amount of RA to generatePL/2 income. The PAF will be provided with maintenance allowance for a year@ Rs. 700/ family per month

A detailed vulnerability analysis has been carried out based on the entitlementpackage, and the extent to which individual families are affected by the project hasbeen determined. The R&R measures are presented in Table 3.3

34

3535

Table 3.3: Details of R&R Assistance for Individual PAFs

SI no. PAF no. Type of Assistance i Maintenance Allowance

A. PAFs losing less than 15% of land and having post LA income below PL

1. 6 IGA to generate P1/ 4 income 350.00/ month for one year2. 42 IGA to generate PL 4 income 350.00/ month for one year3. 73 IGA to generate PL 4 income 350.00/ month for one year4 76 IGA to generate PU 4 income 350.00/ month for one year

B. PA losing more than 15 % of land and having post LA income between PL-2PL

1. 2 IGA to generate PL 4 income Nil2 17 IGA to generate P1 4 income Nil3 28 IGA to generate P1 4 income Nil4 29 IGA to generate P1 4 income Nil5 30 IGA to generate P1 4 income Nil6 3 1 IGA to generate P11 4 income Nil7 46 IGA to generate P1 4 income Nil8 77 IGA to generate P1 4 income Nil

C. PA losing more than 15% of land and having post LA income less than PL

1 25 IGA to generate PL/ 2 income 700/ month for one year

3.8 Rehabilitation Assistance for Loss of Assets:

Private: The land acquisition for the bypass will affect three irrigation wells and onefarmhouse made of brickwork in mud. The irrigation wells are defunct and are not used bythe farmers and the same are valued by GoG and compensated.. The farmhouse has beenacquired, and GoG has paid Rs. 58,080, which has been excepted by the PAF. A smalltemple is also located within the farmhouse. The private temple will be relocate by AMTR.

Community: A community cattle drinking water trough and a marginal part of the villagewater pond will be affected due to LA The extent and impact of the loss will be evaluatedwith the help of an engineer and alternative solutions will be made good from the project.The proposed bypass will severe two of the village cart tracks. The following measures areplanned to minimise these impacts:

35

3636

* Construction of a cattle trough* Provision of an underpass at the southern end of the village and cattle crossing on the

northern part for uninterrupted movements on village cart tracks* Deepening of the Village water tank by desilting and thereby increasing the water

holding capacity

Commercial Squatters: The commercial squatters will be paid up to Rs. 5000 for relocation.A provision of Rs. 5,90,000 has been made for 118 squatters. Those squatters who are unableto effectively exercise the self-relocation option due to locational constraints will be assistedby way of rehabilitation assistance from project contingency (R&R budget). The detailedmeasures will be determined by the implementing social consultant/NGO

Residential Structures: In case of residential encroachment the encroached part is valuatedand compensation for this works out to Rs. 12,98,172/-. The residential squatters, who haveopted for self-relocation, the compensation amount works out to Rs.1,46,780/-

Community Utilities and Structures: The community structures and utilities that need to berelocated as part of ROW clearance includes shifting of 16 temples, 5 roadside drinkingwater posts, and 15 bus stops. The following measures are planned:

D Temples: 3 of the 16 temples are personal temples while the rest are community owned.Discussions held with the focus groups revealed that the people would prefer to shift thetemple as per the village customs with assistance from the company. Therefore, it isproposed that the Project Company will provide construction material and cash assistancefor relocation

* Bus Stands: All these bus stands have been taken into consideration in the designing ofthe project road configuration and bus bays have been provided with

* Drinkin2 Water Stand Posts, Hand Pumps and Public Toilet Blocks: The publicutilities will be shifted outside the RoW of the project road

3.9 Institutional Framework

For the purpose of implementing the RAP an independent full time social consultant will beappointed. The specific tasks of the social consultant being:

* Creating awareness and facilitating community development for implementing economicand social rehabilitation Package

* Assist PAFs in getting their RA for their land* Ensure proper utilisation of RA as available under the R&R package for vulnerable

families requiring IGA* Help PAPs in redressal of their grievances relating to LA and economic rehabilitation* Assist PAPs in IGA selection, effective working and uplifting their standard of living

The cost of engaging a social consultant has been budgeted at Rs. 8,00,000 .

36

3737

An external monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) consultant, appointed by AMTRL will reviewthe implementation of RAP. The M&E consultant will review the RAP implementation for aperiod of 90 person days spread over 2 years. Rs. 6,00,000 has been budgeted towards cost ofappointing an external M&E consultant

3.10 Time Frame

In the present context the RAP will be implemented over a period of 6 months.

Months 1-3: Rapport building with PAFs and withdrawal of cases. Relocation of structuresis also expected to begin in the first month

Months 4-6: Continuation of relocation of structures. Disbursement and of replacementamounts to the respective PAFs. Implementation of IGAs

The following chart gives the time schedule for the RAP.

37

3838

RAP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE - AHMEDABAD MEHSANA ROAD PROJECTActivity January February March April May June

Establish Rapport with PAPs fRelocation of Structures along highway

Withdrawal of land reference cases

Disbursement of Rehabilitation Assistance

Implementation of IGAs

38

3939

3.11 Monitoring of Implementation Progress

ESMG will monitor and evaluate the progress of RAP at the end of each quarter and will submit areport on the same, to the Project Company and Bank for review and comment. A quarterlyprogress report format has been developed to monitor both physical and financial indicatorsof RAP implementation progress. Refer Appendix-5. The format will present a clearpicture of progress made with respect to the targets indicated as per the action plan.However, the targets as per the action plan listed in the attached format may change at thetime of actual implementation. Any such deviation will be highlighted with reasons forthe same at the time of submission of progress reports

3.12 R&R Budget:

The total budget for implementation of RAP is estimated at Rs.1,24,07,385/-. The budgetheads and the expenses are tabulated below:

SI. Budget Head Unit Rate AmountNol. Rehabilitation Assistance Rs.6,91,000 per Ha 61,19,289.002. Incentives for IGA > Rs.20,000 Per IGA for 1 Vulnerable PAF 1,40,000.00

Rs. 10,000 Per IGA for 8 PAFs of 1 to 2PLcategory and 4PAFs of category losing lessthan 15% of land and having income lessthan PL

3. Maintenance Allow. for Vulnerable @ Rs. 350 per PAF per month for one year for 4 25,200.00PAFs PAFs losing land less than 15% and having

income less than PL@ Rs. 700 per PAF per month for one year for 1

PAF losing land less more than 15% andhaving income less than PL

4. Agricultural and IGA expert/advisor Lumpsum 1,00,000.005. Relocation of commercial squatters @ Up to Rs.5000 per structure 5,90,000.006 Compensation for residential Details as per Appendix 4 14,44,952.00

encroachments and squatters7. Construction of Cattle Trough @Rs. 20000 per structure for one structure 20,000.008. Roadside Water posts @Rs. 6,000 per Structure for five structures 30,000.009 Toilet blocks @Rs. 30,000 per Structure for three blocks 90,000.0010. Relocation of Temples @Rs. 20,000 per temple for 16 temples 3,20,000.0011. Community Development in villages Lumpsum 10,00,000.00

along the project road12. Cost of social consultant Lumpsum 8,00,000.0013. Cost of M&E consultant Lumpsum 6,00,000.0014 Contingencies @ 10% of the total amount 11,27,944.10

Total 1,24,07,385.00

39

4040

APPENDICES

40

4141

Appendix - 1

AWARD LIST

Award Name Plot Bolck No Acquired Type of Award land 30% 25-9-99 to Trees Well,Pipe Column 7 5% Total R&B Correct 850000Per

Sr.No Acquired Area land rate/Sq Rate solatium 24-2-200 Value Line to 11 total deduction Award Award Hector

No mts Int @ 12 ,Structure for New Paid Figurefor 29 mth Value condition

land

1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 3 14 15 1 6 17 18

1 Soma Revabhai 1 1218 0.3050 NC 10 30500 9150 8845 216 0 48711 -2436 46275 259250

2 Ramabhai 2 1219/B 10 7000 2100 2030 0 0 11130 -536 10594 10577 59500

Bababhai

Dahyabhai

Atmaram

Ambaram

Shambhai

Girishbhai

3 Ratilal Ramdas 3 1017/B 20 56112 54242 0 0 297394 0 297394 794920

4 Ramabhai Trikam 4 1731 0.1690 10 16900 5070 4901 0 0 26871 0 26871 143650

Jagabhai _ _

5 Baldevji Sagir 5 1734 0.2417 10 24170 7251 7009 0 0 38430 0 38430 205445

Juhaji Lalarjinawali

5 Jadiben Chandu 6 1734 0.0336 10 3360 1008 974 0 0 5342 0 5342 28560

Mathurji'S Widow

Shambuji Baldevji

Savitaben

Lalitaben

Rameshbhai

41

4242

Award Name Plot Bolck No Acquired Type of Award land 30% 25-9-99 to Trees Well,Pipe Column 7 5% Total R&B Correct 850000PerSr.No Acquired Area land rate/Sq Rate solatium 24-2-200 Value Line to 11 total deduction Award Award Hector


land1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Vipulbhai

6 Shanaji Shankarji 7 1733 0.0462 10 4620 1386 1340 0 58080 65426 0 65426 39270

6 Gali Shankarji 8 1837 0.2243 10 22430 6729 6505 1774 0 37438 0 37438 190655Chanaji's Widow

7 Ambaram 9 1738 0.0238 10 2380 714 690 0 0 3784 0 3784 20230ishwarbhaiRanchhodbhaiShivdasKeshubhai Jethidas

Chaturbhai Motidas

RanchhodbhaiYohanbhaiRameshbhaiShalbhaiChandubhai

Nandubhai

8 Menaben Varsangji 10 1739 0.2787 10 27870 8361 8082 831 0 45144 0 45144 236895

Manguben

Dahiben .

9Ataji Sursangi 11 1740 0.2331 10 23310 6993 6760 0 0 37063 0 37063 198135

Sagir

Kalabhai Gandajina

Maganbhai Vali

Sitaben

Babiben Gandaji

Chuthajini Widow

10 Fakirbhai Havjaji 12 0.2613 10 26130 7839 7578 0 0 41547 0 41547 222105

11 Shanaji Shivaji 13 1746 0.0357 10 3570 1071 1035 1573 84710 91959 0 91959 30345

Jivraji Dayaraji

______ Chanduji

42

4343


No mts Int @ 12 Structure for New Paid Figurefor 29 mth Value condition

land1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Galabji

Masaji Sakaji

Keshaji Becharji

Dhodaji

12 Bhochanji Hemaji 14 1753 0.0127 10 1270 381 368 0 0 2019 0 2019 10795

Masgaji VisajiMangajiDhanji Bapajina

Baldevji ValiShambhuji ._.Jhuhaji

Shambhuji

______ Napaldhanaji

Chanduji Mathurji

13 Ramaji Bopaji 15 1834 0.2124 10 21240 6372 6160 0 0 33772 0 33772 180540

Manekben

13 Vihaji Somajina 16 1836 0.0366 10 3660 1098 1061 1052 0 6871 0 6871 31110

Dashrathji & Rupali

Nathiben - Somajibhai Buthajini widow

Shakriben

Khamaji

Libaji Becharji

Sitaben

Shakriben

14 Dhudji Masangji 17 1836 0.0119 10 1190 357 345 0 19660 21552 0 21552 10115

Manguji

Nthaji Dhanaji

43

4444



land1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Baldevji

Dhuraji SagirsamaValiShambhuji Baldevji

Shakriben

Ramaji _

Manekbo Baldevji

Vihaji Somajina

lshwarji Somaji

Dashrathji Vali

Nathiben Rupaben

Jadiben

Savitaben

Lalitaben

Rameshbhai

Vishnubhai

15 Shankarbhai 18 1842 0.1147 10 11470 3441 3326 0 0 18237 0 18237 18597 97495HirabhailshwarbhiNarayanbhaiSavitaben

Babubhai

Baldevbahi

Jiviben

16 Natavrbhai 19 1843 0.1650 10 16500 4950 4785 0 0 26235 0 26235 140250Karshanbhai

17 Baldevji Aatmaram 20 1844 0.1656 10 16560 4968 4802 0 5130 31460 0 31460 Well Off 140760

18 Baldevji Somnath 21 1845 0.0344 10 3440 1032 998 0 0 5470 0 5470 29240

Popatlal Ambalal

44

4545



land1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 Chandulal 22 1887 0.0285 10 2850 855 827 0 0 4532 0 4532 24225Jesangbhai

20 Dashrathbhai 23 1888 0.1030 10 10300 3090 2987 0 0 16377 0 16377 87550Shankarbhari .Siddhrajbhai

21 Harshadkumar 24 1889 0.1562 10 15620 4686 4530 0 0 24836 0 24836 21836 132770Maneklal I IRavindrakumar Parvatiben

Jyotsnaben ManilalVani _Mandakiniben

22 Ambalal 25 1890 0.0060 10 600 180 174 0 0 954 0 954 5100Madhavdas II __

22 Ambalal 26 1899 0.2359 10 23590 7077 6841 0 0 37508 0 37508 200515Madhavdas _

23 Prahaladas 27 1892 0.2640 10 26400 7920 7656 627 43570 86173 0 86173 224400Aatmaram _

24 Ambalal Aatmaram 28 1893 0.0195 10 1950 585 566 0 0 3101 -155 2946 16575

Govind Aatmaram

25 Dashrathbhai 29 1943 0.2310 10 23100 6930 6699 722 0 37451 0 37451 196350ShankarbhaiSiddhrajbhai 30 1897 0.0951 10 9510 2853 2758 10266 0 25387 0 25387 80835

26 Rajendrakumar 31 1898 0.0500 10 5000 1500 1450 0 0 7950 0 7950 42500ShantilalSurendrakumar

Savitaben

27 Chandubhai 32 1900 0.1763 10 17630 5289 5113 3075 0 31107 0 31107 149855Jesambhai

28 Narayanbhai 33 1901 0.1775 10 17750 5325 5148 0 0 28223 0 28223 150875Babubhai . .

29 Sitaben 34 1944 0.1293 10 12930 3879 3750 0 0 20559 -1027 19532 109905____ GGordhanbhai

Jasantbhai

45

4646



land

1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Rameshbhai

Maheshbhai

Renukaben

30 Vadibhai 35 1945 0.1846 10 18460 5538 5353 0 0 29351 0 29351 156910Jesangbhai

31 Aatmarambha 36 1946 0.0767 10 7670 2301 2224 0 0 12195 -610 11585 65195Sikabhai

31 Kanubhai Vithalbhai 37 1951 0.4247 10 42470 12741 12316 0 0 67527 -3376 64151 360995

Shankarbhai 38 1984 0.0636 10 6360 1908 1844 0 0 10112 0 10112 54060NathibenGanpatbhai Lalbhai

Parthotam das

32 Raman Gordhan 40 1950 0.1426 10 14260 4278 4135 216 0 22889 -1144 21745 121210

Sitaben 41 1948 0.1967 10 19670 5901 5704 0 31275 -1564 29711 167195Gordhanbhai_

33 Baldevbhai 1949 0.1271 10 12710 3813 3686 216 0 20425 0 20425 108035Ambabhai

34 Somabhai 42 1953 0.0014 NA 20 280 84 81 0 0 445 0 445 1190Bhaichandbhai _RanchhodbhaiMenaben . .Shertha KedvachiMandalHirabenMangalbhai .Shardaben Ambalal

______ Patel _LilabenChampabenKetanben

______ Govindbhai _

46

4747


No mts int @ 12 Structure for New Paid Figurefor 29 mth Value condition

_______ ~~~~~land1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Parsotamdas

35 Kanubhai 43 1972 0.0111 10 1110 333 322 0 0 1765 -88 1677 9435

ShankarbhaiVithalbahiVikrambhai

Ganpatbhai __.

Nathiben

36 Labhshankar 44 1973 0.0180 10 1800 540 522 0 0 2862 0 2862 15300

Manishankar

Natvarlal

Parsotam

Maneklal

Bipinchandra _ _1634 31561776

37 Parsotam 45 0.2056 10 20560 6168 5962 0 0 32690 -1634 31056 174760KishorbhaiSurajben

SagirBhagyeshbhaiSurajben

38 Sureshbhai 46 1975 0.0060 10 600 180 174 0 0 954 -48 906 5100Amrutbhai .Manubhai

Puriben

39 Ishwarbhai 47 1985 0.1384 10 13840 4152 4014 0 0 22006 0 22006 117640KashibhaiBaldevbhaiAmbabhai IRamanbhai

Shankarbhai

Rewaben _ _

40 Narayanbhai 48 1986 0.0034 10 340 102 99 0 0 541 0 541 2890_Sombhai

47

4848

Award Name Plot Boick No Acquired Type of Award land 30% 25-9-99 to Trees Well,Pipe Column 7 5% Total R&B Correct 850000PerSr.No Acquired Area land rate/Sq Rate solatium 24-2-200 Value Line to 11 total deduction Award Award Hector


land1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

41 Baldevbhai Ambalal 49 1991 0.0504 10 5040 1512 1462 0 0 8014 0 8014 42840

42 Dwarkadas 50 1995 0.1307 10 13070 3921 3790 4518 0 25299 0 25299 111095ManohardasLaxmiben Bhudar

Ishwarbhai_ Bhudarbhai _Ramabhai

NilaykumarlswarbhaiPremilaben

43 Rewaben Ambaram 51 1996 0.0025 10 250 75 73 0 0 398 0 398 2125

NarayanbhaiAmbaramVishnubhai

44 Somabhai 52 1992 0.2027 10 20270 6081 5878 0 0 32229 0 32229 172295Jevarbhai

45 Amrutbhai 53 2032 0.0238 10 2380 714 690 0 0 3784 0 3784 20230Manaaldas

45 Parsotambhai 54 2038 0.1177 10 11770 3531 3413 0 0 18714 0 18714 100045

45 Dahyabhai 55 2092 0.0369 10 3690 1107 1070 3259 0 9126 0 9126 31365

46 Kantaben 56 2033 0.0420 10 4200 1260 1218 0 0 6678 0 6678 35700

AmitkumarBapubhai IGeetaben

Shaileshbhai

47 Navinbhai Laljibhai 57 2036 0.1987 10 19870 5961 5762 0 0 31593 0 31593 168895

47 Shaileshbhai 58 2089 0.0488 10 4880 1464 1415 0 0 7759 0 7759 41480

47 Shardaben Laljibhai 59 1993 0.0879 10 8790 2637 2549 0 0 13976 0 13976 74715

48 Pragjibhai 60 2039 0.0144 10 1440 432 418 0 0 2290 0 2290 12240

Ambaram

Kalidas.____ Ranchhodbhai48 Mathurdas Jhordas

48

4949



land1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Dhana, Fakir,Prabhudas _Motilal RatilalAmbaramAmrutbhaiMangaldasParstotamdas

Dahyabhai

49 Laljibhai Ambaram 61 2040 0.1513 10 15130 4539 4388 0 0 24057 0 24057 128605

KalidasRanchhodbhaiDhabhai Fakirbhai

Prabhudas Motibhai

Ratilal Ambalal

Somnath Muljibhai

AmrutbhaiMangaldasParsotamdas

Dahayabhaih

50 Kantibhai Hirabhai 62 2090 0.3994 10 39940 11982 11583 216 0 63721 0 63721 339490

50 do 63 2041 0.2112 10 21120 6336 6125 0 0 33581 0 33581 179520

51 Natwarbhai 64 2091 0.1763 10 17630 5289 5113 3091 0 31123 0 31123 149855Hirabhai

52 Dhudabhai Hirabhai 65 1994 0.0779 10 7790 2337 2259 216 0 12602 0 12602 66215

Total Area 8.8553

49

5050

Appendix - 2

The following income tables have been prepared by the agricultural scientist for thethree crops generally gROWn in the project area in a year

Table A: Average expenses and income from agricultural activities (Paddy)

Expenses (per hector per crop)Cost head Units and rates TotalPloughing by tractor Rs. 417/h for 3 rounds 1250

(Rs. 100 per bigha per round)Water Rs. 1250/h x 3 time 3750

(Rs. 300 per bigha for one irrigation. Provision for 3 timewater)

Labour Rs. 70/day x 150 days 10500Seeds/fertilizer/ Seed: 190 kg x Rs. 20 = 3800 8800pesticide Fertilizer/ pesticide = 5000Owner Supervision 150 days @ Rs. 50 per day (partial engagement) 7500Total Expenses 31800Income (per hector ercrop)Output Unit Price Total5000 kg/hector 5000 x Rs.10.5 per kg 52500(1200 kg per bigha)Net earning per hector per crop (approx.) 20700

Table B: Average expenses and income from agricultural activities (Wheat)


(Rs. 90 per bigha per round)Water Rs. 1250/h x 7 times 8750

(Rs. 300 per bigha for one irrigation. Wheat needs 7time water)

Labour Rs. 70/day x 130 days 9100Seeds/fertilize Seed: 190 kg x Rs. 15 = 3800 7800r/ pesticide Fertilizer/ pesticide = 4000Owner Supervision 140 days @ Rs. 50 per day (partial engagement) 7000Total Expenses 33776Income (per hector per crop)

50

5151

Output Unit Price Total5000 kg/hector 5000 x Rs.9 per kg 45000(1200 kg per bigha) (Rs. 180 per mon, i.e., Rs. 9 per kg)Net earning per hector per crop (approx.) 11224Table C: Average expenses and income from agricultural activities (Mustard)


(Rs. 90 per bigha per round)Water Rs. 1250/h x 4 times (Rs. 300 per bigha for one 5000

irrigation. Mastered needs 4 time water)Labour Rs. 70/day x 110 days 7700Seeds/fertilizer/ Seed: 42 kg x Rs. 20 = 840 3840pesticide Fertilizer/ pesticide = 3000Owner Supervision 120 days @ Rs. 50 per day (partial engagement) 6000Total Expenses 23666Income (per hector er crop)Output Unit Price Total2500 kg/hector 2500 x Rs.13 per kg 32500(600 kg per bigha)Net earning per hector per crop (approx.) 8834

PAFs who own irrigation sources and or tractor usually gROW three crops a year andearn about Rs. 40000/- (20700 + 11224 + 8834 = 40758) per year per hectare. OthersgROWing 2 crops, earn about Rs. 30000/- (20700 + 11224 = 31924) per year perhectare.

51

5252

APPENDIX 3

DETAILS OF COMMERCIAL ENCROACHERS ONAHMEDABAD-MEHASANA ROAD

WITHIN ROW WITHIN REMARKSt:NAME _______________I__S 0 ALIGNMENT

Location 1: Before Adalaj Crossing : Ahmedabad 21 km.1. Somaji (West) 26 meter2. Arvind Thakur (W) 26 meter

Location 2: IFFCO Rly CrOSs1in Ahmedabad 26 km1. Jaisen (East) 14 meter2. Jaisanji Mathurji (E) 14 meter3. Kanu Bhai (E) 14 meter4. Bhika Ji Thana Ji (E) 14 meter5. Madhna Ji Tema Ji (E)6. Baldev Mathur (E) 14 meter Cycle shop7. Ashwin Amrut (E) 8 meter Pan shop

Location 3: Kalol Ambedkar Chowk: Ahmedabad 28 km.1. Natwar Lal Jata Ram (E) 16 meter2. Mohan Bhai Rabari (E) 16 meter3. Himat Singh Darpen (W) 14 meter

Location 4. Chatral: Ahmedabad 37 km.1. Ayub Bhai I (E) 24 meter

Location 5. Ahmedabad 42 km.1. Mehmood Amir (W) 30 meter2. Nabib Bhai | He has gone3. Imam Kureshi (W) 30 meter Tea stall

Location 6. Gumasen Ra0d : Ahmedabad 45 km

1. Chanaji Sonaji _ _ _ _

Location 7. Nandasan Crossing: Ahmedabad 48 km.1. Sanapat (W) 10 meter2. Hader Ali Badan Ali (W) 20 meter3. Jabeen (W) 18 meter4. A. M. Pathari (W) 18 meter5. Ahmad Mia Sayad (W) 18 meterMia6. V.N. Patel (E) 18 meter7. Sukhadie (E) 18 meter8. Mohamad Hussen (E) 18 meter9. Yakub (E) 18 meter10. Dasharat He has gone11. Mohamad Bhai (E) 8 meter12. Raju Bhai (E) 18 meter

52

5353

Location 8. Near Mahakali Temple: Ahmedabad 60.8 Km.1. RepaJiShankerJi | (W) 24 meter

Location 9. Sobhasan Crossing Opp. Charminar Factory Ahmedabad 67.5 km.

1. SanaJi (W) l19meter

Location 10. Near ONGC Store Gate: Ahmedabad 69.5 km.1. Ram Chandra Prasad (W) 18 meter

2. Mathura Prasad Yadav (W) 18 meter

3. Harash Bhai (W) 18 meter

4. Gajusing Abhay (W) 9 meter

DETAILS OF COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENTS ON KADI-CHATRAL LINKROAD

Name Locatio Within RoW Within Remarksn Kadi Alignment- 0.0 m

1. Harish Bhai Prajapati 0.Om (E) 8 meter2. Prevind bhai Patel 50Gm (W) 7 meter3. Babu Bhai Prajapati 800m (W) 7 meter4. Ashok Ke Maniklal 800m (W) 8 meter5. Kanu bhai Prayapati 800m (W) 8 meter6. Mansukhbhai 800m (W) 8 meter7. Parag 1200m (W) 10 meter8. Subhash Bhai 1200m (E) 8 meter9. Deepak Bhai Laxman 1200m (E) 8 meter10. Fakir Mohh. 1200m (E) 8 meter He has

gone11. Bhika Bhai 1500m (E) 8 meter12. Ashok 1500m (E) 8 meter13. Bijalji 1500m (W) 8 meter14. Ratilal 1800m (E) 9 meter15. Raman Bhai Patel 1800m (E) 10 meter16. Satara Bhai 7000m (E) 10 meter17. Dashrai Bhai 7000m (E) 15 meter18. Chamaji 7000m He has gone19. Sanaji 7000m (E) 15 meter20. Bachor Bhai 7000m (E) 10 meter21. Jamtilal Patel 7000m (E) 15 meter22. Ravendra Nath 7000m He has gone23. Ramesh Bhai 7000m (E) 10 meter24. Maheshbhai Mangalbhai 1200 m (E) 8 meter Old

metal collectshop

53

5454

Appendix 4:Residential Squatters of Fatima ni chali near Jilla Panchayat Quarters next to Sainath complex chanaige28.570 RHS at kalolSr No Structure Cheque Name House No. Built Up Area Valuation Rate (Sq ft) Details of R.A For Remarks

Identificatio Structure acquired area ofn No structure

Rcc Non Rcc Covered Not in TotalHouse House @ Varandha Row but Affected@210 Per 130 Per Sq with IPS affected areaSq ft ft flooring @

Rs 60 per_______________ __________ ~ ~~Sq ft _ _ _ _

1 K/Fatimani Jivabhai 2/11/139 0 363 74 0 437 IPS B/W in 51630 Combine cheque toChal/28.570 Becharbhai Mud, A/C sheet be given of 63070/RHS/kuchh Rabari

a/lIa K/Fatimani N.A 0 88 0 0 88 IPS BIW in 11440

Chal/28.570 Mud, A/C sheet/RHS/kuchh

a/I a2 K/Fatimani Ramkumar N.A 0 131 0 0 131 IPS B/W in 17030

Chal/28.570 Shivdhan Mud, A/C sheet/RHS/kuchh Prajapati

_____ al2 ____a

3 K/Fatimani Ramnaresh Algy N.A 0 128 66 0 194 IPS B/W in 20600Chal/28.570 Jaywara Mud, A/C sheet/RHS/kuchh

___ al34 ___a3

4 K/Fatimani Sabirbhai N.A 0 318 79 0 397 IPS B/W in 46080Chal/28.570 Chotubhai Mud, A/C sheet/RHS/kuchh Sipahi

al4Total 146,780.0

54

5555

Appendix 4R.A valuation details of Residencial Structure coming in project corridor at Chainage35.760 RHS ChattralSr Structure Name of Owner Name of House Built Up Area Valuation Rate (Sq ft) Details of R.A ForNo Identificatio Owner No. Structure acquired

n No area ofstructure

Rcc House Rcc Stair Non Rcc Covered Not in Totaldouble House Case House Varandh Row Affectestoried@240 @210 @210 @ 130 a with but d areaPer Sq ft Per Sq ft Per Sq ft Per Sq ft IPS affecte

flooring d@ Rs 60per Sq ft

I RS/C/RHS/3 Raval Bechar Bhala Chandubhai 1078 to 362 724 53 0 0 0 1139 B/W 2500505/1 Becharbhai 1080 Mosaic

Raval Rcc Stair

2 RS/C/RHS/3 Shanabhai Keshabhai Baldevbhai 1081 & 0 1004 53 53 0 0 1110 B/w, Tile, 2288605/2 Keshabhai 1082 IPS, Otta

KanabhaiRaval

3 RS/C/RHS/3 Nathabhai Somabhai Natwarbhai 1388 0 0 0 382 33 0 415 IPS, A/C 516405/3 Somabhai sheet B/W

Raval

Total 530550

55

5656

Appendix 4R.A valuation details of Residencial Structure coming in project corridor at Chainage 21.080 LHSSertha Para Near IFFCo Kashturinagar ___Sr No Structure Name of Owner House Built Up Area Valuation Rate (Sq Details of R.A For Remarks

Identificati No. ft) Structure acquired area ofon No structure

Rcc Non Rcc Covered Not in TotalHouse House Varandha Row but Affecte@210 Per @ 130 with IPS affected d areaSq ft Per Sq ft Flooring @

Rs 6o Per Sq_____________ ~ft _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I RS/S/KN/2 Vishaji Somaji 1627 to 504 0 0 0 504 B/Wall, 105,840.01/1 Thakore 1629 IPS, RCC

Slab

la RS/S/KN/2 Ishaji Somaji Thakore 1630 to 504 0 146 0 650 B/Wall, 114,600.01/la 1632 IPS, RCC

________ ~~~~ ~~Slab__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2 RS/S/KN/2 Narayan Danaji 1572 0 296 0 0 296 B/Wall, 38,480.01/2 Thakore IPS,Ceme

nt Sheet3 RS/S/KN/2 Sakribben Mafatji 1576 217 34 0 70 321 B/Wall, 64,690.0

1/3 Thakore IPS, RCCSlab Grilsin front

4 RS/S/KN/2 Daihiben Dhulaji 1575 217 0 0 0 217 B/Wall, 45,570.01/4 Thakore IPS, RCC

Slab Grils_________________ _______ in front

4a RS/S/KN/2 Laxmiben 1574 217 0 0 0 217 B/Wall, 45,570.01/5 BhalajiThakore IPS, RCC

Slab Grils_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~in fro n t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

56

5757

6 RS/S/KN/2 Shantiji Somnaji 1573 0 191 0 29 220 IPS, 28,600.01/6 Thakore B/Wall,

GI sheet7 RS/S/KN/2 Mr Bharatbhai M 1577 571.68 0 151.97 0 723.7 IPS, 129,171.0

1/7 Soni B/Wall,_____ ______IRCC slab

8 RS/S/KN/2 Babiben Bholaji 1568/ 0 282 0 0 282 B/w IPS 36,660.01/8 Thakor 1569

8a RS/S/KN/2 Babiben Bholaji 0 60 63 0 123 GI sheet, 11,580.0 Tenant Harun Usmanbahi1/8 a Thakor B/Wall, Shaikh Ami Auto Garage, Rs

IPS 5000 as shifitng Allowance

8b RS/S/KN/2 0 135.6 152.55 0 288.2 GI sheet, 26,781.0 Tenant Tom C Josh - St1/8b B/Wall, Zavier Tyre Services, Rs

IPS 5000 as shifitng Allowance

8c RS/S/KN/2 0 60 63 0 123 GI sheet, 11,580.0 Galabji Madhaji owner and1/8c B/Wall, Tenant Nanen Methew Holly

fPS Marry Auto Electricals

Out of 50000 for the structure value, Rs 35000 paid to Owner & Rs 5000 each ( iel5OOO) is given to the tenant asshifting allowance

9 RS/S/KN/2 Ramaji Ishwarji N.A 0 65.34 0 0 65.34 GI sheet, 8500 Say 85001/9 Thakor B/Wall,

fPS10 RS/S/KN/2 Maganbhai Vajubhai 1564/1 0 665.5 224.7 0 890.2 GI sheet, 100000 Say 1,00,000

1/10 Purohit( Hotel B/Wall,Purohit) lIPS

Total 7,67,622

57

5858

Annexure- 5

QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FORMAT

Sl.No Action Plan Target as per Achievement during this Cumulative Progress at the % progress to TargetImplementation Plan Quarter end of this Quarter

Physical Financial in Physical Financial Physical Financial Physical FinancialRs.

1. Rehabilitation Assistance 79 6 1,19,289.00beneficiary

2 Incentives for IGA 13 1,40,000.00beneficiary

3 Maintenance Allow. for 5 25,200.00Vulnerable PAFs beneficiary

4 Relocation of commercial 118 5,90,000.00squatters beneficiary

5. Compensation for residential 17 14,44,952.00encroachments and squatters

6. Construction of Cattle Trough 1 20,000.007. Roadside Water posts 5 30,000.008. Toilet blocks 3 90,000.009. Relocation of Temples 16 3,20,000.0010. Community Development at 10,00,000.00

villages along project road

58

5959

59

ahmedabad mehsana toll road company limited · ahmedabad mehsana toll road company limited...

Documents