agenda - monday, may 4, 2015
TRANSCRIPT
Board of Commissioners County Manager
Dan Ingle, Chairman Craig F. Honeycutt
Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman Commissioner's Meeting Room
Linda Massey, Commissioner 124 West Elm Street
David I. Smith, Commissioner Graham, NC 27253
Robert “Bob” Byrd, Commissioner May 4, 2015, 9:00 AM
AGENDA
Generated 5/1/2015 1:55 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER - CHAIRMAN INGLE
2. INVOCATION
3. PUBLIC SPEAKERS
4. COMMISSIONERS' RESPONSES
5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
6. CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed under Consent are generally of a routine nature. The Board may take action to
approve/disapprove all items in a single vote. Any item may be withheld from a general action, to be
discussed and voted upon separately at the discretion of the Board.
A. APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS
1. RECREATION AND PARKS COMMISSION - EARL JAGGERS
B. OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL
1. OUT OF STATE TRAVEL REQUEST - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
C. TAX REFUNDS & RELEASES
1. TAX REFUNDS AND RELEASES
2. EXEMPTION APPLICATION EXTENSION - REFUGE TEMPLE CHURCH
D. SECONDARY ROAD ADDITIONS - ROGER'S NEST SUBDIVISION
E. SECONDARY ROAD ADDITIONS - BEAVER HILLS ESTATES SUBDIVISION
F. SECONDARY ROAD ADDITION - VILLAS AT SOUTHWICK
G. ALAMANCE COUNTY HOME GRANT PROGRAM BUDGET FY15-16
H. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. ALAMANCE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - REGULAR MEETING - APR 6, 2015
9:00 AM
7. PUBLIC HEARING: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES
1. APPROVAL OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES AGREEMENT
8. PRESENTATIONS/OTHER BUSINESS
1. 1371 : PROCLAMATION- CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH AWARENSS WEEK - CHAIRMAN
INGLE
Regular Meeting Monday, May 4, 2015 9:00 AM
2 | P a g e
2. 1377 : PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL POLICE WEEK 2015 - CHAIRMAN INGLE
3. 1373 : STATE OF THE COUNTY HEALTH REPORT 2014 - STACIE SAUNDERS, HEALTH
DIRECTOR
4. 1374 : APPROVAL OF A PLANNED TRANSPORTATION PROJECT- GOV. SCOTT FARM RD -
COUNTY MANAGER HONEYCUTT
9. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT
1. TDA INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT
10. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS
11. ADJOURNMENT
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
ACTION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Brian Baker DATE SUBMITTED: 04/23/15
DEPT: Recreation & Parks
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
This item seeks the appointment of Mr. Earl Jaggers to the Recreation and Parks Commission to fill the seat of Mr. Bobby Harmon who will be resigning his position on the Commission. This appointment has been recommended by the Recreation and Parks Commission.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
6.A.1
Packet Pg. 3
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
ACTION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Stacie Saunders DATE SUBMITTED: 04/24/15
DEPT: Health Department
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Out of State Travel
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Please consider this request for Mr. Carl Carroll, Environmental Health Director, to attend the 2015 National
Environmental Health Association (NEHA) Conference in Orlando, Florida, July 11-July 17. Food & Lodging
funds allocated from DPH will reimburse the expenses incurred for this training.
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
OOST - Carl Carroll - 2015 NEHA request form (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
6.B.1
Packet Pg. 4
6.B.1.a
Packet Pg. 5
Att
ach
men
t: O
OS
T -
Car
l Car
roll
- 20
15 N
EH
A r
equ
est
form
(13
69 :
Ou
t o
f S
tate
Tra
vel R
equ
est
- E
nvi
ron
men
tal H
ealt
h)
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
ACTION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Jeremy Akins DATE SUBMITTED: 04/24/15
DEPT: Tax
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Tax Refunds, Release and Elderly, Disabled Exemptions; Elderly Extensions
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Tax Refunds, Release and Elderly, Disabled Exemptions as well as Disabled and Elderly Extensions
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
2015 May Release (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
6.C.1
Packet Pg. 6
2015 May Releases1DATE 4/24/15 BOARD REVIEW OF CORRECTED RECEIPTS REPORT PAGE TIME 10:45:37 ALAMANCE COUNTY Releases PROG# CL218 USER APERKINS DEPOSIT DATES 3/27/2015 THROUGH 4/24/2015 TAX DEPOSIT YEAR TAXPAYER NAME DATE RECEIPT DIST REAL PERSONAL M VEH MV FEE S WASTE REASON ABTC ===================================================================================================================================02012 FARRELL CHRISTOPHER CLARK 4/14/2015 1999009 11 13.84 SOLD PPSL 2012 FARRELL CHRISTOPHER CLARK 4/14/2015 1999010 11 13.16 SOLD PPSL0 ** YEAR TOTALS ** 27.0002013 BRADSHER HEATHER CHATMAN 4/02/2015 2357553 12 49.24 TAG TURN IN 2242 PPSL 2013 FARRELL CHRISTOPHER CLARK 4/14/2015 2234220 11 13.31 SOLD PPSL 2013 FARRELL CHRISTOPHER CLARK 4/14/2015 2234221 11 13.66 SOLD PPSL0 ** YEAR TOTALS ** 26.97 49.2402014 BALTAZAR EDGAR SOSA 4/21/2015 2367891 34 48.48 NOT ON THE MHP L PPSL 2014 BALTAZAR EDGAR SOSA 4/21/2015 2367892 34 67.73 NOT ON THE MHP L PPSL 2014 DAVIS CRYSTAL BROOKE 4/20/2015 2382126 35 26.41 SOLD PPSL 2014 FARRELL CHRISTOPHER CLARK 4/14/2015 2410331 11 13.06 SOLD PPSL 2014 FARRELL CHRISTOPHER CLARK 4/14/2015 2410332 11 13.41 SOLD PPSL 2014 MAHALEY MELVIN SHAWN 4/08/2015 2412699 44 8.37 MC NOT ACCORD PPVA 2014 NORRIS BILLI 4/21/2015 2384776 12 32.70 DID NOT OWN THE PPSL0 ** YEAR TOTALS ** 210.16- *** FINAL TOTALS *** 264.13 49.24- *** NORMAL END OF JOB ***�
Page 1 6.C.1.a
Packet P
g. 7
Attachment: 2015 May Release (1368 : Tax Refunds and Releases)
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
ACTION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Jeremy Akins DATE SUBMITTED: 04/24/15
DEPT: Tax
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval from the Board is needed to accept a late exemption application for 2014 for Refuge Temple Church
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Refuge Temple Church has requested by letter for the Board to approve their 2014 late Exemption application
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Refuge Temple letter and form for late exemption filing 2014 (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
6.C.2
Packet Pg. 8
6.C.2.a
Packet Pg. 9
Att
ach
men
t: R
efu
ge
Tem
ple
lett
er a
nd
fo
rm f
or
late
exe
mp
tio
n f
ilin
g 2
014
(13
67 :
Exe
mp
tio
n A
pp
licat
ion
Ext
ensi
on
Ap
pro
val -
Ref
ug
e T
emp
le
6.C.2.a
Packet Pg. 10
Att
ach
men
t: R
efu
ge
Tem
ple
lett
er a
nd
fo
rm f
or
late
exe
mp
tio
n f
ilin
g 2
014
(13
67 :
Exe
mp
tio
n A
pp
licat
ion
Ext
ensi
on
Ap
pro
val -
Ref
ug
e T
emp
le
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Tory Frink DATE SUBMITTED: 04/27/15
DEPT: County Clerk
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of secondary road additions of Ravenwood Drive; Nester's Court; Mockingbird Trail; Rock Castle Court;
& Creekwood Drive to Roger's Nest Subdivision.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
ATTACHMENTS:
5-4-15 Alamance County BOC Memo for Roger's Nest (PDF)
5-4-15 Road Addition Investigation Report Roger's Nest (PDF)
5-4-15 Roger's Nest Map (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
…
6.D
Packet Pg. 11
Board of Commissioners
Dan Ingle, Chairman
Eddie Boswell, Vice-Chairman
Linda Massey
David I. Smith
Robert “Bob” Byrd
Alamance County BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
124 West Elm Street Graham, NC 27253-2865
County Manager
Craig Honeycutt
County Attorney
Clyde Albright
Clerk to the Board
Tory M. Frink, NCCCC
RESOLUTION
FOR ADDITION TO SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the attached investigation report for the additions of Ravenwood Drive;
Nester's Court; Mockingbird Trail; Rock Castle Court; and Creekwood Drive at Roger's Nest
Subdivision has been filed with the Board of Commissioners for the County of Alamance
requesting that it should be added to the Secondary Road System; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners for the County of Alamance is of the opinion
that the above-described roads should be added to the Secondary Road system, if the roads meet
the minimum standards and criteria established by the Division of Highways of the Department
of Transportation and Highway Safety for addition of said roads to the system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners for the
County of Alamance that the Division of Highways is hereby requested to review the above-
described roads, and to take them over for maintenance if they meet established standards and
criteria.
Adopted the 4th day of May, 2015.
6.D
Packet Pg. 12
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA GOVERNOR SECRETARY
P.O. Box 766, Graham, NC 27256-0766
April 14, 2015
ALAMANCE COUNTY
Mr. Craig Honeycutt
County Manager
Alamance County
124 West Elm Street
Graham, North Carolina 27253
SUBJECT: Request for Road Addition
Ravenwood Drive
Nester’s Court
Mockingbird Trail
Rock Castle Court
Creekwood Drive
Roger’s Nest Subdivision
Dear Mr. Honeycutt:
Please find attached is Form SR-4 Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report, Form SR-1
Petition for Road Addition, recorded plat, and a location map for the above subject.
This is being forwarded to you for consideration by your Board of Commissioners.
Sincerely,
C.N. Edwards, Jr., P.E.
District Engineer Attachments
CNE/tcs
6.D.a
Packet Pg. 13
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 A
lam
ance
Co
un
ty B
OC
Mem
o f
or
Ro
ger
's N
est
(13
64 :
Sec
on
dar
y R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
s -
Ro
ger
's N
est
Su
bd
ivis
ion
)
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance Co. File No: A-00-28 Date: 04-01-2015
Township: Albright Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Ravenwood Drive
Subdivision Name:
Roger’s Nest
Length:
0.47 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
I-2
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
1.5 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No_X_
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes__ No__X__
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes.
Recording Date: 09-17-1998
09-17-1998
Book: 61
61
Page: 158
159
Number of homes having entrances into road: 26
Other uses having entrances into road: Serves as access road for subdivision.
Right-of-Way Width:
50feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes.
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes. If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes.
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition.
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards Jr., PE Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills, PE
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.D.b
Packet Pg. 14
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt R
og
er's
Nes
t (
1364
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- R
og
er's
Nes
t S
ub
div
isio
n)
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance Co. File No: A-00-28 Date: 04-01-2015
Township: Albright Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Nester’s Court
Subdivision Name:
Roger’s Nest
Length:
0.12 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
I-2
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
1.5 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No__X
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes__ No__X__
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes.
Recording Date: 09-17-1998 Book: 61 Page: 158
Number of homes having entrances into road: 11
Other uses having entrances into road: None.
Right-of-Way Width:
50 feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes.
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes. If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes.
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition.
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards Jr., PE Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills, PE
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.D.b
Packet Pg. 15
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt R
og
er's
Nes
t (
1364
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- R
og
er's
Nes
t S
ub
div
isio
n)
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance Co. File No: A-00-28 Date: 04-01-2015
Township: Albright Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Mockingbird Trail
Subdivision Name:
Roger’s Nest
Length:
0.12 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
I-2
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
1.5 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No_X_
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes__ No__X__
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes.
Recording Date: 09-17-1998 Book: 61 Page: 158
Number of homes having entrances into road: 10
Other uses having entrances into road: None.
Right-of-Way Width:
50 feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes.
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes. If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes.
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition.
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards Jr., PE Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills, PE
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.D.b
Packet Pg. 16
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt R
og
er's
Nes
t (
1364
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- R
og
er's
Nes
t S
ub
div
isio
n)
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance Co. File No: A-00-28 Date: 04-01-2015
Township: Albright Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Rock Castle Court
Subdivision Name:
Roger’s Nest
Length:
0.24 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
I-2
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
1.5 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No_X_
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes__ No__X__
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes.
Recording Date: 09-17-1998
12-01-1998
03-15-1999
Book: 61
62
63
Page: 158
69
44
Number of homes having entrances into road: 15
Other uses having entrances into road: None.
Right-of-Way Width:
50 feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes.
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes. If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes.
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition.
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards Jr., PE Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills, PE
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.D.b
Packet Pg. 17
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt R
og
er's
Nes
t (
1364
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- R
og
er's
Nes
t S
ub
div
isio
n)
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance Co. File No: A-00-28 Date: 04-01-2015
Township: Albright Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Creekwood Drive
Subdivision Name:
Roger’s Nest
Length:
0.07 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
I-2
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
1.5 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No_X_
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes__ No__X__
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes.
Recording Date: 09-17-1998
10-21-2003 Book: 61
68 Page: 159
130
Number of homes having entrances into road: 4
Other uses having entrances into road: None.
Right-of-Way Width:
50 feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes.
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes. If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes.
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition.
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards Jr., PE Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills, PE
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.D.b
Packet Pg. 18
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt R
og
er's
Nes
t (
1364
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- R
og
er's
Nes
t S
ub
div
isio
n)
6.D.c
Packet Pg. 19
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
og
er's
Nes
t M
ap (
1364
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- R
og
er's
Nes
t S
ub
div
isio
n)
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Tory Frink DATE SUBMITTED: 04/27/15
DEPT: County Clerk
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of secondary road additions of Raccoon Run Drive Ext. SR 1222 - 0.12 miles; Red Wolf Way - 0.11
miles; and Black Bear Cove - 0.17 miles to Beaver Hills Subdivision.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
ATTACHMENTS:
5-4-15 Alamance County BOC Memo Beaver Hill Estates (PDF)
5-4-15 Road Addition Investigation Report Beaver Hill Estates (PDF)
5-4-15 Roger's Nest Map (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
…
6.E
Packet Pg. 20
Board of Commissioners
Dan Ingle, Chairman
Eddie Boswell, Vice-Chairman
Linda Massey
David I. Smith
Robert “Bob” Byrd
Alamance County BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
124 West Elm Street Graham, NC 27253-2865
County Manager
Craig Honeycutt
County Attorney
Clyde Albright
Clerk to the Board
Tory M. Frink, NCCCC
RESOLUTION
FOR ADDITION TO SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the attached investigation report for the additions of Raccoon Run Drive
Ext.SR 1222 - 0.12 miles; Red Wolf Way - 0.11 miles; and Black Bear Cove - 0.17 miles at
Beaver Hill Estates Subdivision has been filed with the Board of Commissioners for the County
of Alamance requesting that it should be added to the Secondary Road System; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners for the County of Alamance is of the opinion
that the above-described roads should be added to the Secondary Road system, if the roads meet
the minimum standards and criteria established by the Division of Highways of the Department
of Transportation and Highway Safety for addition of said roads to the system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners for the
County of Alamance that the Division of Highways is hereby requested to review the above-
described roads, and to take them over for maintenance if they meet established standards and
criteria.
Adopted the 4th day of May, 2015.
6.E
Packet Pg. 21
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA GOVERNOR SECRETARY
P.O. Box 766, Graham, NC 27256-0766
April 22, 2015
ALAMANCE COUNTY
Mr. Craig Honeycutt
County Manager
Alamance County
124 West Elm Street
Graham, North Carolina 27253
SUBJECT: Request for Road Addition
Raccoon Run Drive Ext. SR 1222 – 0.12 miles
Red Wolf Way – 0.11 miles
Black Bear Cove – 0.17 miles
Beaver Hill Estates Subdivision
Dear Mr. Honeycutt:
Please find attached is Form SR-4 Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report, Form SR-1
Petition for Road Addition, recorded plat, and a location map for the above subject.
This is being forwarded to you for consideration by your Board of Commissioners.
Sincerely,
C.N. Edwards, Jr., P.E.
District Engineer Attachments
CNE/tcs
6.E.a
Packet Pg. 22
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 A
lam
ance
Co
un
ty B
OC
Mem
o B
eave
r H
ill E
stat
es (
1370
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- B
eave
r H
ills
Est
ates
Su
bd
ivis
ion
)
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance/Guilford Co. File No: A-12-07 Date: 04-10-2015
Township: Coble, Rock Creek,
Greene Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Raccoon Run Drive Ext. SR 1222
Subdivision Name:
Beaver Hill Estates
Length:
0.36 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
I-2
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
2 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No_X_
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes__ No_X___
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes.
Recording Date: 12-22-98, 10-28-
02,10-28-02, 10-28-02 Book: 62, 148, 148, 148 Page: 108, 52, 54, 55
Number of homes having entrances into road: 6
Other uses having entrances into road: Serves as access road for Red Wolf Way, Muskrat Trail, Groundhog Trace.
EST ADT 90.
Right-of-Way Width:
50 feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes.
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes. If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes.
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition. 0.24 miles in Guilford County.
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards, Jr., PE Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills, PE
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.E.b
Packet Pg. 23
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt B
eave
r H
ill E
stat
es (
1370
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- B
eave
r H
ills
Est
ates
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance/Guilford Co. File No: A-12-07 Date: 04-08-2015
Township: Coble, Rock Creek,
Greene Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Black Bear Cove
Subdivision Name:
Beaver Hill Estates
Length:
0.19 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
I-2
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
2 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No_X_
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes_ No__X__
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes.
Recording Date: 12-22-98
10-28-02
Book: 62
148
Page: 108
52
Number of homes having entrances into road: 7
Other uses having entrances into road: None.
Right-of-Way Width:
50 feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes.
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes. If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes.
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition. 0.02 miles in Guilford County
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards, Jr, PE Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills, PE
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.E.b
Packet Pg. 24
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt B
eave
r H
ill E
stat
es (
1370
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- B
eave
r H
ills
Est
ates
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance Co. File No: Date: 04-08-2015
Township: Coble Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Red Wolf Way
Subdivision Name:
Beaver Hill Estates
Length:
0.11 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
I-2
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
2 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No__X
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes__ No_X___
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes.
Recording Date: 12-22-98 Book: 62 Page: 108
Number of homes having entrances into road: 3
Other uses having entrances into road: Serves as access road for Black Bear Cove. Est. ADT 60
Right-of-Way Width:
50 feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes.
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes. If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes.
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition.
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards, Jr, PE Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills, PE
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.E.b
Packet Pg. 25
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt B
eave
r H
ill E
stat
es (
1370
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- B
eave
r H
ills
Est
ates
6.E.c
Packet Pg. 26
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
og
er's
Nes
t M
ap (
1370
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
ns
- B
eave
r H
ills
Est
ates
Su
bd
ivis
ion
)
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Tory Frink DATE SUBMITTED: 04/29/15
DEPT: County Clerk
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of secondary road additions of Southwick Drive to the Villas at Southwick.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
ATTACHMENTS:
5-4-15 Alamance County BOC Memo Southwick Drive (PDF)
5-4-15 Road Addition Investigation Report Southwick Drive (PDF)
5-4-15 Southwick Drive Map (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
…
6.F
Packet Pg. 27
Board of Commissioners
Dan Ingle, Chairman
Eddie Boswell, Vice-Chairman
Linda Massey
David I. Smith
Robert “Bob” Byrd
Alamance County BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
124 West Elm Street Graham, NC 27253-2865
County Manager
Craig Honeycutt
County Attorney
Clyde Albright
Clerk to the Board
Tory M. Frink, NCCCC
RESOLUTION
FOR ADDITION TO SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the attached investigation report for the addition of Southwick Drive at the
Villas at Southwick has been filed with the Board of Commissioners for the County of Alamance
requesting that it should be added to the Secondary Road System; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners for the County of Alamance is of the opinion
that the above-described road should be added to the Secondary Road system, if the roads meet
the minimum standards and criteria established by the Division of Highways of the Department
of Transportation and Highway Safety for addition of said roads to the system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners for the County of
Alamance that the Division of Highways is hereby requested to review the above-described
roads, and to take them over for maintenance if they meet established standards and criteria.
Adopted the 4th day of May, 2015.
6.F
Packet Pg. 28
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA GOVERNOR SECRETARY
P.O. Box 766, Graham, NC 27256-0766
April 28, 2015
ALAMANCE COUNTY
Mr. Craig Honeycutt
County Manager
Alamance County
124 West Elm Street
Graham, North Carolina 27253
SUBJECT: Request for Road Addition
Southwick Drive
The Villas at Southwick
Dear Mr. Honeycutt:
Please find attached is Form SR-4 Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report, Form SR-1
Petition for Road Addition, recorded plat, and a location map for the above subject.
This is being forwarded to you for consideration by your Board of Commissioners.
Sincerely,
C.N. Edwards, Jr., P.E.
District Engineer Attachments
CNE/tcs
6.F.a
Packet Pg. 29
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 A
lam
ance
Co
un
ty B
OC
Mem
o S
ou
thw
ick
Dri
ve (
1375
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
n -
Vill
as a
t S
ou
thw
ick)
Form SR-4 (11/05/07)
North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways
Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report
County: Alamance Co. File No: A-13-10 Date: 03-20-2015
Township: Albright Div. File No: Div. No: 7
Local Name:
Southwick Drive
Subdivision Name:
The Villas at Southwick
Length:
0.30 miles
Width:
20 feet Surface
Type:
SF9.5A
PVMT Condition:
Good
Surface
Thickness
2 inches
Base Type
ABC Base
Thickness
8 inches
*Bridges
Yes____
No_X_
* Pipe > 48”
Yes____
No_X_
*Retaining
Walls Within Right of Way
Yes___ No__X__
* If Yes -Include Bridge Maintenance Investigation Report
Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes
Recording Date: 7/20/2009 Book: 73 Page: 240
Number of homes having entrances into road: 5
Other uses having entrances into road: Serves as access road for townhomes and a golf course. Est. ADT 100
Right-of-Way Width:
65 feet If right-of-way is below the desired width, give reasons under “Remarks and Recommendations.”
Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes
Is the County Commissioners Approval (SR-2) attached? Yes If not, why not?
Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the
Planning Department? Yes
Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost: $ 0.00
Grade, drain, stabilize: $ 0.00 Drainage: $ 0.00 Other: $ 0.00
Remarks and Recommendations: Road meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition.
Submitted by: C.N. Edwards, Jr. Reviewed and Approved: J.M. Mills
DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION ENGINEER
Reviewed and Approved
BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER: __________________________________________
Do not write in this space- For Use by Secondary
Roads Unit
Petition #
6.F.b
Packet Pg. 30
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 R
oad
Ad
dit
ion
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epo
rt S
ou
thw
ick
Dri
ve (
1375
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
n -
Vill
as a
t S
ou
thw
ick)
6.F.c
Packet Pg. 31
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-4-1
5 S
ou
thw
ick
Dri
ve M
ap (
1375
: S
eco
nd
ary
Ro
ad A
dd
itio
n -
Vill
as a
t S
ou
thw
ick)
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
ACTION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Libby Hodges DATE SUBMITTED: 04/10/15
DEPT: Planning
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of the HOME Program Grant Budget for fiscal year 2015-2016.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Alamance County is a partner in the HOME Consortium, along with the City of Greensboro and City of
Burlington. Every year, the County receives funding through this program for home rehabilitations for
low-to-moderate income residents. As part of the agreement, the program is administered by the City of
Burlington Community Development office. At this time, the County anticipates a total program budget
of $ 120,422. No County funds are obligated as a match for this program. The necessary program match
is provided by the City of Burlington through prior program income.
Attached are memoranda from Shawna Tillery, Community Development Administrator for the City of
Burlington, and the proposed program budget for FY 2015-2016.
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
15-16 HOME Commissioners Memo (PDF)
Alamance County HOME Program 15-16 Budget (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
6.G
Packet Pg. 32
MEMORANDUM
TO: Libby Hodges, Planning Director Alamance County FROM: Shawna Tillery, Community Development Administrator-City of
Burlington DATE: April 10, 2015 SUBJECT: County Commissioners Agenda – May 4, 2015
Approval to Submit FY 15-16 County HOME Program Budget
Please request the County Commissioners at the May 4, 2015 meeting to consider approving the FY 15-16 County HOME Program Budget. The City of Burlington and Alamance County are members of a Consortium of Local Governments receiving federal HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program funds. As Lead Entity for the HOME Consortium, the City of Greensboro prepared the HOME Program Five-year Consolidated Plan. The Alamance County Board of Commissioners must approve submission of the County’s proposed uses of HOME Program funds during fiscal year 2015-16 for inclusion in the Consortium’s Plan. Attached is the draft program year FY 2015-16 budget for the Alamance County HOME Program.
6.G.a
Packet Pg. 33
Att
ach
men
t: 1
5-16
HO
ME
Co
mm
issi
on
ers
Mem
o (
1358
: H
OM
E G
ran
t P
rog
ram
Bu
dg
et F
Y 1
5-16
)
Alamance County HOME Program One-Year Action Plan
FY 2015-16
Summary of Proposed Budget
Projected Revenue: HOME Program Funds $ 94,132* Program Income 8,000 Local Match Funds 18,290 Total $120,422 Proposed Expenditures: Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation $ 99,450 CHDO Set-Aside 14,632 Administration 6,340*
Total $120,422
*The City of Greensboro’s administrative fee of 3.5% of total appropriated funds that will be charged per Consortium member was deducted from the amount of HOME Program funds available. Greensboro will deduct these funds from the allocation available for each jurisdiction to use for administrative costs.
Summary of Proposed Projects
Project Name: Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation Proposed Expenditures: HOME Program Funds $ 73,160 Program Income 8,000 Local Match Funds 18,290
Total $ 99,450 Project Description: Project funds will be used for deferred loans to rehabilitate owner-occupied housing units located outside of the Burlington municipal limits. The housing rehabilitation process will include performing any required lead-based paint hazard reduction procedures on the units. When necessary, the program participants will be temporarily relocated.
6.G.b
Packet Pg. 34
Att
ach
men
t: A
lam
ance
Co
un
ty H
OM
E P
rog
ram
15-
16 B
ud
get
(13
58 :
HO
ME
Gra
nt
Pro
gra
m B
ud
get
FY
15-
16)
Project Name: CHDO Set-Aside Proposed Expenditure: HOME Program Funds $14,632 Project Description: From Alamance County's HOME Program allocation, funds for the approved CHDO, Alamance County Community Services Agency, will be set-aside to assist with the development of affordable housing in the Apple Street subdivision. Administration: $6,340 ________________________________________________________________ Note: HOME Program regulations require a 25% local match of all expenditures
of HOME Program funds other than administrative funds. The required match for the CHDO project is included in the local funds designated for housing rehabilitation activities.
6.G.b
Packet Pg. 35
Att
ach
men
t: A
lam
ance
Co
un
ty H
OM
E P
rog
ram
15-
16 B
ud
get
(13
58 :
HO
ME
Gra
nt
Pro
gra
m B
ud
get
FY
15-
16)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE ALAMANCE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR ALAMANCE COUNTY
HELD ON MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2015
Generated 4/30/2015 8:51 AM
Call to Order - Chairman Ingle
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Dan Ingle Chairman Present
Eddie Boswell Vice Chairman Present
Linda Massey Commissioner Present
David I Smith Commissioner Present
Robert E. Byrd Commissioner Present
Invocation - Chairman Ingle
Public Speakers
Tony Cox made a $200 donation to the World Trade Center Memorial.
Mayor Lenny Williams, Town of Gibsonville, spoke on the Alamance-Guilford County Line issue. He said that he
was hopeful that the two counties could have reached a similar agreement like with Orange County. Mayor
Williams continued that in May 2014 Guilford County Commissioners reversed their previous decision and decided
to support the NC Geodetic line. He indicated that the Guilford County Commissioners had been provided an
inaccurate tax value of property that would go to Alamance County which was the reasoning behind their reversed
decision.
Ken Borne, citizen, complimented the board on the wonderful job that they have done.
Jane Ferrita, Beaver Hills resident, spoke about county line issue.
Commissioners' Responses
Vice Chair Boswell responded to Mayor Williams comments and informed that the resolution was not on the agenda
but will be discussed later on in the meeting. He spoke that the board needs to decided if they are willing to give
Guilford County the additional property currently being taxed in Alamance County.
Chairman Ingle advised that he had met with Guilford County Chairman Henning and it was discussed that the 2
boards would put the issue on the "back-burner" for now. He said that when Guilford Commissioners met with their
local legislation it was brought up and decided that a bill would be drawn in support of the geodetic line.
Commissioner Byrd said he appreciated Mayor Williams comments along with Ms. Ferrita and that he was at that
meeting when all of those property owners showed up. He also informed Mr. Cox that he made his $200 donation
online to the World Trade Center Memorial.
Approval of the Agenda
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
SECONDER: Robert E. Byrd, Commissioner
AYES: Ingle, Boswell, Massey, Smith, Byrd
Consent Agenda
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
SECONDER: Robert E. Byrd, Commissioner
AYES: Ingle, Boswell, Massey, Smith, Byrd
Appointments/Reappointments
Alamance Beautiful Commission - Reappointments: Naydine Sharpe, Jeanette Isley, Judy Moser, William
Webster, Peggy Howe, & Ricky Yow Appointments: Pat Baugess, Ronald Baugess, & Jenny Matherly
Reappointment of Naydine Sharpe, Jeanette Isley, William Webster, Peggy Howe, and Ricky Yow; appointments of
Pat Baugess, Ronald Baugess, and Jenny Matherly to the Alamance Beautiful Commission.
Board of Equalization & Review - Frank Bell & Beth Glidewell
6.H.1
Packet Pg. 36
Min
ute
s A
ccep
tan
ce:
Min
ute
s o
f A
pr
6, 2
015
9:00
AM
(A
pp
rova
l of
Min
ute
s)
Regular Meeting Monday, April 6, 2015 9:00 AM
2 | P a g e
Reappointment of Frank Bell and appointment of Beth Glidewell to the Board of Equalization & Review.
Out-of-State Travel
Out of State Travel Request - Health
American College of Nurse-Midwives 60th Annual Meeting and Exhibition, June 28th-July 1, 2015, National
Harbor, MD for Elizabeth Sciora.
Review Officer Appointments
Appointment of Andrew Shore, Brandon Park, Chris Marland, Daniel Shoffner, David Beal, Frankie Maness,
Jeffrey Earp, Joey Lea, Lillian Hodges, Montrena Hadley, Nathan Page, Paul King, and Sean Tencer as review
officers for Alamance County.
Recommendation Regarding Renewal of Recycling Franchise Agreements
Franchise Agreement - Republic Services of NC, LLC
Franchise Agreement between Alamance County and Republic Services of NC, LLC for collection and transporting
recyclable materials through June 30, 2018. This ordinance will be approved after a second reading on April 20,
2015.
Franchise Agreement - Waste Industries, LLC
Franchise Agreement between Alamance County and Waste Industries, LLC for collection and transporting
recyclable materials through June 30, 2018. This ordinance will be approved after a second reading on April 20,
2015.
Recommendation Regarding Renewal of Garbage Franchise Agreements
Franchise Ordinance - Republic Waste Services (Unincorporated Areas)
Ordinance Renewing the Franchise Agreements between the County of Alamance and Republic Services of NC,
LLC for collection and disposal of household garbage through June 30, 2018. This ordinance will be approved after
a second reading on April 20, 2015.
Franchise Ordinance - Waste Industries (Unincorporated Areas)
Ordinance Renewing the Franchise Agreements between the County of Alamance and Waste Industries, Inc for
collection and disposal of household garbage through June 30, 2018. This ordinance will be approved after a
second reading on April 20, 2015.
Tax Refunds & Releases
Tax Refunds and Release
Tax refunds and releases; a copy of the refunds is set forth hereafter.
Exempt Application Extension Approval - Iglesia Misionera Pentecostes Camino De Santidad
Approval of late tax exemption for Iglesia Misionera Pentecostes Camino De Santidad.
Approval of Minutes
Alamance County Board of Commissioners - Regular Meeting - Mar 16, 2015 7:00 PM
Approval of the regular meeting minutes of March 16, 2015 as read.
Alamance County Board of Commissioners - Special Joint Meeting - Feb 19, 2015 4:00 PM
Approval of the special joint meeting minutes of February 19, 2015 as read.
Public Hearing
2015-62 : Public Hearing - CBC America Corp and to Grant Economic Development Incentives
Mac Williams, President of Alamance County Chamber, introduced Michael Ozimek, representative from CBC
America to answer any questions about the company. Mr. Ozimek recognized two Board of Directors that were
present, Phil Petito, and Kan Saito. Commissioner Byrd asked if the company was considering manufacturing or a
distribution warehouse. Mr. Ozimek answered that it would be a distribution warehouse center. Vice Chair Boswell
asked how did the company decide that Alamance County was the right fit for the distribution center. Mr. Ozimek
said that the geography of the county was a factor because it is conveniently located to ports and relativity to the
major interstates. Chairman Ingle asked about the range of job pay and how many employees did he anticipate
relocating and new hires. Mr. Ozimek spoke that his company is anticipating significant growth and have a number
of investment strategies over the next 3-7 years. He said that his company is also looking at acquisitions which
6.H.1
Packet Pg. 37
Min
ute
s A
ccep
tan
ce:
Min
ute
s o
f A
pr
6, 2
015
9:00
AM
(A
pp
rova
l of
Min
ute
s)
Regular Meeting Monday, April 6, 2015 9:00 AM
3 | P a g e
would bring more jobs to the area. He said the salary ranges depended on the job type. Mr. Ozimek said the jobs
would include the management team, some engineering jobs, and the distribution center jobs. Commissioner Byrd
asked if the jobs required any special skills that might would afford opportunities to some of the students at the
community college. Mr. Ozimek said that yes technical skills would be required . Vice Chair Boswell asked if the
company is going into an existing building or new construction. Mr. Ozimek answered that they will be going into
an existing building.
Chairman Ingle opened the floor for speakers:
Tony Cox
Ken Borne said he is in commercial real estate and agreed that the county offers convenient access to ports and
interstate.
No other speakers wished to be heard from the floor.
Vice Chair Boswell, seconded by Chairman Ingle moved to close the public hearing.
County Manager Honeycutt said that the county would pay incentives based on 29 jobs at $500 per job which would
equal to $14,500 once the company fulfilled the job requirement.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Robert E. Byrd, Commissioner
SECONDER: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
AYES: Ingle, Boswell, Massey, Smith, Byrd
Presentations/Other Business
1340 : Resolution in Support of Displaying US Motto "In God We Trust" - Rick Lanier, USMAC
Rick Lanier, Co-founder of US Motto Action Committee and former Davidson County Commissioner, invited the
board to join the growing list of counties and municipalities to adopt and display the "In God We Trust" in and on
governmental buildings. Mr. Lanier stated that he had led his board to vote in support in displaying "In God We
Trust" in 2002. He said these words have been used on US currency since 1864. Mr. Lanier mentioned that
displaying the motto "In God We Trust" gives ceremonial honor to public events and expresses confidence in our
society. He also noted that the words were engraved above the entrance to the US Senate Chamber and right above
the Speaker of the House in the US House of Representatives. Mr. Lanier continued that former President Dwight
Eisenhower had adopted the motto as the official National Motto of the United States of America. He stated that
displaying the motto is a legal right that is protected by the first amendment and that the US House of
Representatives voted overwhelmingly to reaffirm "In God We Trust" as the nation's motto. Vice Chair Boswell
thanked Mr. Lanier for coming down from Lexington to present this issue and emphasized that we do need God to
move forward in our nation. Chairman Ingle spoke that this great nation was founded on Christian-Judeo principles
and he read the Preamble to the North Carolina Constitution to further illustrate his point. Commissioner Byrd said
that he had read the appellate court decision and that it is on good legal grounds to have the motto displayed on
county buildings. He also clarified whether Mr. Lanier's organization would be covering the cost to add the motto
to county buildings. Mr. Lanier responded that it was no cost to the county and that it would be paid for by private
donations. Commissioner Byrd asked if the motto would be placed on all county buildings. Mr. Lanier answered
that it could be placed on as many as the board preferred.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
SECONDER: Dan Ingle, Chairman
AYES: Ingle, Boswell, Massey, Smith, Byrd
1351 : Out-of-State Travel Request:Sheriff's Office - Sheriff Terry Johnson
Sheriff Terry Johnson sought approval of an out-of-state travel request to travel to Washington, DC to honor fallen
Deputy George Massey during the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Week (May 11-15, 2015). Sheriff
Johnson informed that Deputy Massey was in the midst of an investigation when he was struck by a passing vehicle
on the night of March 3, 1934. He continued that Deputy Massey's name will be added to the Fallen Officer's
Memorial Wall and that he would like to use state and federal drug forfeiture money to cover the cost of the trip.
Sheriff Johnson noted that members of his Honor Guard have been invited to participate in various ceremonies
throughout the week and a candlelight vigil. Deputy Massey's grandson was present at the meeting and spoke a
few words. Vice Chair Boswell said he appreciated Sheriff Johnson pushing this forward and thanked him and his
officers. Commissioner Byrd asked whether the forfeiture money had already been budgeted for something else.
6.H.1
Packet Pg. 38
Min
ute
s A
ccep
tan
ce:
Min
ute
s o
f A
pr
6, 2
015
9:00
AM
(A
pp
rova
l of
Min
ute
s)
Regular Meeting Monday, April 6, 2015 9:00 AM
4 | P a g e
He said this sounded like a good use for those funds. Chairman Ingle said forfeiture funds can be used for any non-
budgeted item.
Public Health Month Proclamation
Stacie Saunders, Health Director, introduced Aya White, to read the Public Health Month Proclamation.
Commissioner Byrd said as the Board of Health Commissioner Representative and someone who had a career in
health care he would like to move approval of this proclamation. Ms. Saunders introduced some other health
department staff that were present at the meeting.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Robert E. Byrd, Commissioner
SECONDER: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
AYES: Ingle, Boswell, Massey, Smith, Byrd
1341 : Approval of Audit Contract - Susan Roberts, Finance Officer
Susan Roberts, Finance Officer, presented the audit contract for approval. She said that the contract has to be
approved annually and she was proposing to use Martin-Starnes & Associates for another year. Commissioner
Byrd asked if this contract was ever bid out. Ms. Roberts said from that it has occasionally been bid out. Ms.
Roberts mentioned that they have received excellent service from Martin-Starnes. She informed that due to time
constraints they were not able to bid out this year but could plan to bid it out next year. Ms. Roberts noted there
was a slight price increase due to the added compliance of the Social Services components. Vice Chair Boswell said
that he would like to see the contract bid out next year. The board was in consensus that the audit contract be bid
out next year.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
SECONDER: Robert E. Byrd, Commissioner
AYES: Ingle, Boswell, Massey, Smith, Byrd
1334 : Resolution Opposing House Bill 917 Modifying the Local Sales & Use Tax Distribution - County
Manager Honeycutt
County Manager Honeycutt, presented the resolution opposing House Bill 917 modifying the Local Sales and Use
Tax Distribution. Vice Chair Boswell said he was in favor of this resolution. Commissioner Byrd concurred with
Vice Chair Boswell that he was in favor of the resolution also. Chairman Ingle referred to the distribution of lottery
proceeds as an example and agreed that the resolution was needed. Commissioner Byrd said the state has the
constitutional obligation to support public schools but has pushed this responsibility down to the counties.
Commissioner Smith asked if the county's Senator was one of the sponsors of this bill. Commissioner Byrd said that
Senator Gunn got an "earful" about this issue during the local Legislative Breakfast. Vice Chair Boswell answered
yes and that the bill was still in process and that the Senate and the House could have two different versions. Vice
Chair Boswell mentioned that the local House delegates seem more sympathetic to not wanting this bill to pass.
Commissioner Byrd noted there was a minor typo in the resolution that needed correction.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
SECONDER: Robert E. Byrd, Commissioner
AYES: Ingle, Boswell, Massey, Smith, Byrd
Budget Amendments
Budget Amendment - Planning Department
Libby Hodges, Planning Director, presented a budget amendment in the amount of $7414 to reflect the additional
funds that was spent for one of the projects in the Urgent Repair Program. She said that all funds have been
reimbursed by the state the budget amendment just helps the paper work balance. Commissioner Byrd said that the
paperwork was very confusing. He noted that a $75,000 allocation was shown on one page and then half of that
amount was shown on another page as being the amount. Ms. Hodges said that the programs awards half of the
funds up front and then the entity has to show that they can obtain the other half of the funds.
6.H.1
Packet Pg. 39
Min
ute
s A
ccep
tan
ce:
Min
ute
s o
f A
pr
6, 2
015
9:00
AM
(A
pp
rova
l of
Min
ute
s)
Regular Meeting Monday, April 6, 2015 9:00 AM
5 | P a g e
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Robert E. Byrd, Commissioner
SECONDER: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
AYES: Ingle, Boswell, Massey, Smith, Byrd
County Manager's Report
County Manager Honeycutt discussed a proposed resolution on the Alamance-Guilford County line. He reviewed
that Guilford County just filed a local bill referencing the NC Geodetic Survey as the official county line. He
continued that the county has proposed this resolution asking them to go back to the local bill using the 150 foot
buffer that was agreed upon in 2013 since there seems to be no negotiations with Guilford County at this point.
County Attorney Albright said that it was up to the board to make a decision to either oppose the local bill, or create
their own bill, or put it in the hands of the legislator to try and achieve what was done in 2013. Commissioner Byrd
said his understanding was both counties had to agree on the bill before it is passed. County Attorney Albright
answered that it was up to the General Assembly. Vice Chair Boswell inquired on how much money had been spent
by the individual property tax owners on having their properties resurveyed. Bruce Walker, GIS Manager answered
that letters that were sent out to affected property owners asked them not to move forward with property surveys
until the process had been approved by both sets of commissioners. Commissioner Byrd asked if there needs to be
research as to the total value of those properties and whether Guilford County had erroneous information that caused
the miscommunication. Commissioner Smith spoke that he was not sure why a lot of time was being wasted on
this. He said this issue has been ongoing for at least 10 years and that Guilford County changes their mind in a
second. Vice Chair Boswell mentioned that he spoke with Representative Riddell and explained the situation. He
said that if the board sends this resolution that he hoped the General Assembly would defer to representatives from
both counties to weigh in on this matter. County Manager Honeycutt said if the resolution passes then staff will re-
submit local bill that was passed in 2012. Commissioner Byrd said that he would like to see the property values to
make sure we have accurate information if the board is planning to argue this matter. Vice Chair Boswell requested
information on the properties that will change or have always been taxed in Alamance County.
County Manager Honeycutt provided a quick update on the Insurance Committee's recommendation to approve
Pierce Group as the new health insurance broker for the county. Chairman Ingle asked if there was a consensus of
the board to allow staff to negotiate a contract with Pierce Group. Commissioner Smith complimented the Insurance
Committee on the good job they did of sending out the request for bids. Vice Chair Boswell asked if the employee
health clinic would remain open. County Manager Honeycutt said that he hopes it will remain open. He reminded
that the next Facilities Task Force meeting is scheduled for May 6th at 9:30am at the Family Justice Center.
Commissioners' Comments
Commissioner Smith said he had heard reports that old jail roof is leaking and was concerned about the legal
liability of the county if it is not repaired. He asked Richard Hill, Facilities Director, to provide more information on
the matter. Mr. Hill reviewed that over the years repairs have been made. He said that he met with Baker Roofing,
and they recommended that the existing roof needed to be removed. Bryan Hagood, Assistant County Manager,
explained that there were funds up to $25,000 from Capital Reserve Fund for the board to approve spending for a
temporary fix. He reiterated that this was not a long term solution and that the best long term solution would be to
replace the roof. Commissioner Smith asked Chief Deputy Britt to comment on how bad the leak was at the jail.
Chief Deputy Britt stated that some offices had 35 gallon trash cans set up to collect the rain when it rained. He also
noted that there had been a leak in one of the jail cells but made the state aware they were working to correct the
problem.
Mr. Hagood asked for approval at this time for up to $25,000. Vice Chair Boswell speculated that the leak was
probably damaging other things when the water penetrated other areas of the structure. He said this leak needed to
be addressed. Commissioner Byrd expressed concerned about spending $25, 000 for a "band-aid fix" for just a few
months. He continued if the county spent $25,000 and then the $230,000 later that would be a total of $255,000
when the county could fix it now for $230,000. Chairman Ingle said go ahead and fix the roof and now and
confirmed with Commissioner Smith if that was he recommendation at the beginning of the discussion.
Commissioner Byrd asked Susan Roberts, Finance Officer to verify the fund balance and whether funds were
available. She said the funds were available and there was $21.5 million in unassigned fund balance.
Commissioner Smith, seconded by Chairman Ingle moved approval of replacing the new roof now with funds
from fund balance.
6.H.1
Packet Pg. 40
Min
ute
s A
ccep
tan
ce:
Min
ute
s o
f A
pr
6, 2
015
9:00
AM
(A
pp
rova
l of
Min
ute
s)
Regular Meeting Monday, April 6, 2015 9:00 AM
6 | P a g e
Vice Chair Boswell reminded everyone about the Early Education Summit that is scheduled at the Moseley Center.
Chairman Ingle announced that the county had received a check and letter from Ronnie Beale, President of the NC
Association of County Commissioners, in the amount in $8,723 as a one-time dividend payment.
Chairman Ingle also read a letter from Paula Woodard, President of the NC County Clerks Association,
commending the Tory Frink, County Clerk, for the outstanding job of hosting the NC County Clerks Association's
annual conference.
Chairman Ingle and Vice Chair Boswell recognized Alamance-Burlington School Board Members that were present.
Adjournment
There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 AM
Respectfully Submitted,
______________________________________
CLERK TO THE BOARD
6.H.1
Packet Pg. 41
Min
ute
s A
ccep
tan
ce:
Min
ute
s o
f A
pr
6, 2
015
9:00
AM
(A
pp
rova
l of
Min
ute
s)
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
ACTION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Craig Honeycutt DATE SUBMITTED:
DEPT: County Manager
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of economic development incentives.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION: CONCUR
ATTACHMENTS:
Active_66576494_3_MGP_Purchase of Graham NC Distribution Center - Incentive Agreement (2) 4 29 15 (2)
(PDF)
4-28-15 Affidavit -Notice of Public Hearing (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
7.1
Packet Pg. 42
00300D-000001/393268 v4
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ALAMANCE
AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ____day of _____________2015, by and
between MGP RETAIL CONSULTING, LLC (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the
“Company”), and the CITY OF MEBANE, a North Carolina municipal corporation (hereinafter
sometimes referred to as “Mebane”), the CITY OF GRAHAM, a North Carolina municipal
corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Graham”) and ALAMANCE COUNTY, a
North Carolina County (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “County”)
RECITALS:
A. The Company which is presently located in McLean, Virginia is considering locating a
new regional headquarters and distribution facility (hereinafter “Facility”) in the North
Carolina Commerce Park (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “NCCP”), which is an
economic development zone under an extended agreement between two cities and
County, and will construct a new building and install machinery and equipment with said
facility to be in service no later than December 31, 2017 (“Completion Date”), and to be
located within the corporate limits of Graham, Alamance County, North Carolina.
B. The Facility will involve new capital investment (including, building, machinery and
equipment) of approximately One Hundred Twenty-five Million Dollars
($125,000,000.00).
C. Subject to Section 2.e. below, the Facility will create eighty (80) full time employment
positions with average salaries of $80,000.00 and One Hundred Twenty (120) hourly
employees.
D. Some elements of said job creation and investment may be made by an affiliated entity or
successors to the Company, but for the purposes of this Agreement, shall be deemed to
have been made by the Company.
E. It is contemplated that the Facility will be located upon property upon which or through
which the Units may need to construct, install, maintain and operate water and sewer
utilities and transportation routes to serve other properties.
F. The County, Graham, and Mebane (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the
“Units”, and individually as, a “Unit”) find that in order to aid and encourage the
construction of the Facility and installation of the machinery and equipment in NCCP, it
is necessary and desirable to assist and reimburse the Company for a portion of its
construction costs and new equipment costs.
G. Pursuant to G.S. Section 160A-20.1, 158-7.1, and 158-7.2, as construed by the North
Carolina Supreme Court in its opinion in Maready v. The City of Winston-Salem, et al,
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 43
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 2
342 N.C. 708 (1996), the Units may enter into an agreement with the Company in
connection therewith.
H. The Units finds that reimbursing the Company for a portion of its construction and
equipment costs serves a public purpose and will increase the taxable property base for
the County and Cities and help create not less than eighty (80) new jobs in the County by
the Completion Date, all of which will result in an added and valued benefit to the
taxpayers of the County and Cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual provisions and covenants herein, and
other good and valuable consideration which the parties hereby acknowledge, The Company,
The County, Mebane and Graham agree as follows:
1. To assist the Company in its transportation and access infrastructure, the Units will
provide Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00), (hereinafter sometimes referred to as
“Local Transportation Grant Funds”), towards roadway construction starting at Governor
Scott Farm Road and ending and connecting to Melville Commerce Parkway (the
“Parkway Extension”), such improvements to be to a standard to accommodate
commercial truck traffic carrying standard commercial loads, including but not limited to
those having three to five axles, to and from the Facility. The Units may use their best
efforts to secure grants to reimburse themselves for a portion of the foregoing. The Units
also agree to use their best efforts to secure Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($750,000.00) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “State Entity Grant Funds”; the Local
Transportation Grant Funds and State Entity Grant Funds being sometimes hereinafter
collectively referred to as the “Transportation Improvement Funds”), from the North
Carolina Department of Transportation for the improvement of Governor Scott Farm
Road (“Farm Road Improvements”; the Parkway Extension and Farm Road
Improvements being hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the “Transportation
Improvements”).
(a) The Units are hereby responsible for the design and construction (including
administration of all contracts and agreements in connection therewith) for the
Transportation Improvements and assumes all responsibility for the cost of
thereof, including but not limited to the Transportation Improvement Funds, with
no recourse to the Company. The Transportation Improvements shall be
completed within one (1) year of the date of this Agreement ("Transportation
Improvements Deadline"). In the event that the Units determine that they will be
unable to complete the Transportation Improvements by the Transportation
Improvements Deadline, they covenant and agree to immediately provide written
notice of such inability to the Company. Upon receipt of such written notice, or in
the event that the Company determines in its good faith, reasonable discretion that
the Transportation Improvements will not be completed by the Transportation
Improvements Deadline, then the Company may elect, upon written notice to the
Units, to assume control of the construction of the Transportation Improvements
at the Units sole cost and expense. In such event the Units hereby covenant and
agree to fully cooperate with the Company in (i) appropriating funds to pay all
engineers, architects, contractors, subcontractors or material suppliers
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 44
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 3
("Transportation Vendors") involved in the construction of the Transportation
Improvements, and to assign to the Company all rights in and to any contracts
with the Transportation Vendors as the Company may elect to assume, (ii)
condemning, or entering into the necessary agreements with the applicable
landowners to convey to the Units, the portions of any properties necessary to
construct the Transportation Improvements, all at the sole cost and expense of the
Units, (iii) delivery of all plans, reports, studies, and agreements related to the
construction of the Transportation Improvements, (iv) granting of all rights,
permits, and/or approvals necessary to permit the Company to construct the
Transportation Improvements, and (v) accepting the dedication of the
Transportation Improvements and thereafter maintaining such Transportation
Improvements in a first class manner and condition. In the event that the
Company elects to pay, in its sole discretion, any amounts due by the Units to the
Transportation Vendors for the Transportation Improvements, the Units shall
reimburse the Company for such amounts within thirty (30) days after receipt of
written invoice therefor from the Company.
(b) The Units hereby covenant and agree to promptly implement the provisions of,
and provide copies to, the Company of the fully-executed agreements between the
Units and the Golden Leaf Foundation and the N.C. Rural Center Fund related to
the construction of the Transportation Improvements.
2. To further assist the Company in its site acquisition, Facility construction, and machinery
and equipment installations, and subject to the requirements hereinafter set forth, each
Unit agrees to reimburse the Company for a portion of said construction and installation
costs in the amount of One Million One Hundred Twenty-five Thousand Dollars
($1,125,000.00), for a total of Three Million Three Hundred Seventy-five Thousand
Dollars ($3,375,000.00) (the "Incentive Funds"). In performance of all activities involved
in the site acquisition and facility construction, as well as in the machinery installation,
the Company shall have full discretion to make all decisions regarding such
improvements and contracting and purchasing without the joinder or approval of the City
except for the requirements set forth in Paragraph 8 below. These payments of cash
grants from Alamance, Graham, and Mebane to the Company shall be made as follows:
(a) A payment of Six Hundred Seventy-five Dollars ($675,000.00) shall be paid by
the Units in equal sums of Two Hundred Twenty-five Dollars ($225,000.00) from
each Unit, to the Company after the Facility has received its certificate of
occupancy, and the Company has certified to the Units that eighty (80) full time
positions have been filled at the Facility, provided, however, that all property tax
liabilities on the above referenced Facility and machinery and equipment (in the
above agreed amount) shall have been paid by the Company for the fiscal year in
which the certificate of occupancy has been issued. In the event that there are any
outstanding property tax liabilities on the above referenced Facility and
machinery and equipment at the time such payment contemplated herein is due,
such payment shall be delayed until the date that is ten (10) days after such
outstanding property tax liabilities have been paid.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 45
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 4
(b) Four (4) additional payments of Six Hundred Seventy-five Thousand Dollars
($675,000.00) shall be paid by the Units in equal sums of Two Hundred Twenty-
five Thousand Dollars ($225,000.00) from each Unit, annually to the Company on
the anniversary date of the first payment in (a) above, provided that there are no
outstanding property tax liabilities on the above referenced Facility and
machinery and equipment. In the event that there are any outstanding property tax
liabilities on the above referenced Facility and machinery and equipment at the
time such payment contemplated herein is due, such payment shall be delayed
until the date that is thirty (30) days after such outstanding property tax liabilities
have been paid.
(c) All payments provided for in subparagraphs (a) and (b) shall be made no later
than Thirty (30) calendar days after satisfaction of the requirements described in
the subparagraphs. Any payment due hereunder shall be adjusted so that the total
payments to the Company shall not exceed 2.8333% times the annual taxable
value of the property (excluding land, but expressly including all improvements
located thereon) maintained by the Company for ad valorem tax purposes during
the year period beginning at the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. All
payments are subject to the requirement that not less than eighty (80) full time
jobs shall be maintained by the Company at the Facility;
(d) In the event of the Company's failure to create eighty (80) jobs and invest
$125,000,000 by the Completion Date, the Units shall grant a reasonable
extension of time to the Company to meet the job and investment criteria in this
Agreement or otherwise agree to such other performance criteria that equate to a
similar economic and fiscal return to the Units.
(e) In the event that the Company fails to make the full investment of
$125,000,000.00 by the Completion Date, as it may be extended, the cash grant
payments will be pro-rated using the $125,000,000.00 as the denominator and the
taxable value as the numerator, which in turn shall be multiplied times that cash
grant for the applicable fiscal year of the Units, however, the denominator may be
modified pursuant to subsection 2(d) above.
(a) Graham agrees to waive all local impact and inspection fees, having an estimated
value of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00).
3. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the parties hereto covenant
and agree that the Transportation Improvement Funds, Transportation Improvements, and
Incentive Funds (collectively, "Incentives") are a material consideration in the Company's
decision to locate the Facility in Graham, North Carolina, that the Company would not
have located its Facility in Graham, North Carolina without the Incentives and that the
Company will be substantially harmed in the event that the Units obligations are not
satisfied as provided herein.
4. During the performance of the Agreement, the Company agrees to allow representatives
of the Units to enter upon its property during normal business hours upon forty-eight
hours prior notice for the purpose of confirming the new construction and the purchase of
new equipment has occurred. To the extent allowed by applicable law, the Units covenant
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 46
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 5
and agree to protect, and not use or disclose, any of the Company’s confidential and
proprietary information.
5. If prior to the Units expending monies, for any reason whatsoever the Company chooses
not to make the above referenced investments and to cancel this Agreement, it may do so
by providing written notice. Upon such notification, this Agreement shall be cancelled
and all of its terms and conditions shall become void. If, however, the Company chooses
not to make the above referenced investment and any one of the Units has expended
funds, the Company shall be liable for a return or pay-back of the government funds
expended as hereinafter stated.
6. The Company agrees, upon request of the Units, to make full and accurate accounting to
the Units of all expenditures and construction and acquisition of equipment referenced
above as required by this Agreement upon completion of total investment and the
granting of the Certificate of Occupancy. The Company shall make such accounting as is
necessary to verify construction and purchase of equipment and after such construction
and purchase of equipment has been verified, the Company shall have no further
obligations to account to the City for any other expenses incurred.
7. The Company shall not discriminate against any person on the grounds of race, color,
national origin, sex, age, or disability in the administration of this Agreement nor shall
any person be excluded from participation in, or be denied the benefits of, any project
constructed under this Agreement on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age,
or disability.
8. The Units respectively bind themselves, their successors, assigns, and legal
representatives to other parties hereto and those parties’ successors, assigns, and legal
representatives, in respect to covenants, agreements, and obligations contained herein. No
party to this Agreement shall assign the Agreement or any of the obligations or rights
described herein without written consent of the other. If either party attempts to make
such an assignment without such consent, that party shall nevertheless remain legally
responsible for all obligations under the Agreement. The Company may assign this
Agreement to a subsidiary, parent or affiliated company, with the written consent of the
Units which shall not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld.
9. This Agreement may be modified only by a written agreement executed which must be
approved by the Units by all parties hereto. The contractual commitments provided for
herein and made by the parties hereto shall be deemed to continue into the future, survive
and remain binding upon future elected and appointed officials to the full extent
permitted under applicable law. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts
separately with the resultant executed counterparts forming a single Agreement.
10. In the event of such cancellation of the Agreement described above, the Units shall have
no further obligations to make any further payments as called for in this Agreement.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 47
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 6
11. The parties and each person executing this Agreement on behalf thereof represent and
warrant that they have the full right and authority to enter into this Agreement, which is
binding, and to sign on behalf of the party indicated, and are acting on behalf of
themselves, the constituent members and the successors and assigns of each of them. The
parties agree to reasonably assist one another and cooperate in the defense (should any
defense ever be necessary) of this Agreement and/or the incentives granted hereunder, so
as to support and in no way undercut the same. In the event that any of the incentives or
other assignments of the Units are determined to be invalid, the Units agree that they will,
to the fullest extent permitted by law, provide the Company with any permitted incentives
of substantial equal value pursuant to one more or more replacement incentive grant
programs.
12. No provision of this Agreement may be invalidated, except by the Superior Court of
Alamance County which shall have sole jurisdiction over any disputes which arise under
this Agreement or otherwise regarding the parties hereto, and further, venue shall be
proper and shall lie exclusively in the Superior Court of Alamance County, North
Carolina.
If any such court holds any provision of this Agreement, invalid or unenforceable, then:
(a) Such holdings shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision of
this Agreement
(b) Such provision shall be construed as closely as possible to the Party’s Original
intent in order to render such provision valid or enforceable, as applicable; and
(c) The remaining terms hereof; together with such reconstructive provision, shall
constitute the parties’ entire agreement hereof.
13. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between Units and the Company and
supersedes any and all other agreements on this subject between parties.
14. In the event that, prior to completion of the Facility, the Units expend funds for any of the
incentives provided for in this Agreement, whether for road infrastructure or cash grants,
and the Company elects to cancel the Agreement or does not comply with its obligations
to construct the Facility, the Company agrees to fully reimburse the Units for any
amounts expended by them through the date of such cancellation. The Company shall
reimburse the Units within thirty (30) days of written demand. In the event that Company
fails to re-pay such amounts, the Units may recover the funds advanced under this
Agreement plus all the costs of collection, including without limitation reasonable
attorney fees.
15. Company acknowledges that the Units are governmental entities, and validity of this
Agreement is based upon the availability of public funding under the authority of its
statutory mandate. Subject to the provisions of Section 10, in the event that public funds
are unavailable for the performance of the Units’ obligations under this Agreement, then
this Agreement shall remain in full effect, provided, however, that the payment
obligations of the Units shall be temporarily suspended, without penalty to the Units,
immediately upon written notice to Company of the unavailability of public funds. At
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 48
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 7
such time as such public funds are again available, the payment obligations of the Units
hereunder shall be deemed reinstated without necessity of further written agreement. It is
expressly agreed that the Units shall not activate this "unavailability" provision for its
convenience or to circumvent the requirements of this Agreement, but only as an
emergency fiscal measure during a substantial financial crisis. In either event, the public
parties agree that they will use best efforts to replace, through other sources available to
them under law, funds due to the Company, as soon as practical. In the event of a change
in the Units’ statutory authority, mandate and/or mandated functions by State and/or
Federal legislative or regulatory action, which adversely affects the Units’ authority to
continue its obligations under this Agreement, then this Agreement shall be suspended
without penalty to the Units upon written notice to Company of such limitations or
change in the City’s legal authority.
16. Company agrees that upon written request of the Units that company will grant to the
requesting Unit(s), free of charge, easements that are, in the Company’s sole discretion,
reasonable and necessary for water and/or sewer utilities and for transportation services
(including without limitation temporary construction and/or drainage easements) that
serve the Facility and its property. The easements shall be in mutually agreeable form
and substance consistent with the Units’ standard form agreements. Any such easements
shall be located in areas of Company’s property which will not unreasonably interfere
with Company’s intended use of Company’s Facility. The Company commits that it will
favorably consider, on a case by case basis, any requests from such units for similar
easements to serve adjoining properties provided that such requested easements will not
have a detrimental impact upon the Company’s property or Facility operations.
17. Any notices required by this Agreement shall be mailed to the following persons:
If to County:
Need contact information
If to Mebane:
Need contact information
If to Graham:
Need contact information
If to Company:
Robert Lester
Development Manager
MGP Retail Consulting LLC
8200 Greensboro Drive, Suite 900
McLean, VA 22102
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 49
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 8
With a copy to:
Christopher D. Lloyd
Senior Vice President and Director
McGuireWoods Consulting, LLC
901 East Cary Street
Richmond, VA 23219
And to:
Josiah A. Bancroft
McGuireWoods LLP
1230 Peachtree Street, Suite 2100
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
[Signatures Appear on Next Page]
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 50
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 9
IN WITHNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this agreement
as of the day and year first above written.
"MEBANE"
CITY OF MEBANE, a municipal corporation of
the State of North Carolina
By:
Glendel Stephenson, Mayor, City of Mebane
This instrument has been preaudited in the manner required by the Local Government Budget
and Fiscal Control Act.
_____________________________________ ___________________________
Jeanne Tate, Mebane Finance Officer Date
Approved as to Legal Form and Sufficiency
_____________________________________
Lawson Brown, Jr., Mebane City Attorney
[Signatures Continue on Next Page]
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 51
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 10
"GRAHAM"
CITY OF GRAHAM, a municipal corporation of
the State of North Carolina
By:
Jerry Peterman, Mayor, City of Graham
This instrument has been preaudited in the manner required by the Local Government Budget
and Fiscal Control Act.
_____________________________________ ___________________________
Sandra King, Graham Finance Officer Date
Approved as to Legal Form and Sufficiency
_____________________________________
Keith Whited, Graham City Attorney
[Signatures Continue on Next Page]
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 52
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
00300D-000001/393268 v4 11
ALAMANCE COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of North Carolina
By:
Dan Ingle, Chairman, Alamance County
This instrument has been preaudited in the manner required by the Local Government Budget
and Fiscal Control Act.
________________________________________ ___________________________
Susan Roberts, Alamance County Finance Officer Date
Approved as to Legal Form and Sufficiency
_____________________________________
Clyde Albright, Alamance County Attorney
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 53
Att
ach
men
t: A
ctiv
e_66
5764
94_3
_MG
P_P
urc
has
e o
f G
rah
am N
C D
istr
ibu
tio
n C
ente
r -
Ince
nti
ve A
gre
emen
t (2
) 4
29 1
5 (2
) (
1365
: A
pp
rova
l of
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 54
Att
ach
men
t: 4
-28-
15 A
ffid
avit
-N
oti
ce o
f P
ub
lic H
eari
ng
(13
65 :
Ap
pro
val o
f E
con
om
ic D
evel
op
men
t In
cen
tive
s A
gre
emen
t)
<
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
PROCLAMATION AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Tory Frink DATE SUBMITTED: 04/27/15
DEPT: County Clerk
SPONSORED BY: Eddie Boswell, Vice Chairman
RECOGNITION OF:
Children's Mental Health Awareness Week in Alamance County, May 3rd-9th, 2015.
PURPOSE OF RECOGNITION:
Increase awareness of Children's Mental Health
ATTACHMENTS:
…
Proclamation National Children’s Mental Health Awareness Week
May 3 – 9, 2015
WHEREAS, mental health is essential to overall health; and WHEREAS, addressing the complex mental health needs of children, youth, and families today is fundamental to the future of Alamance County; and WHEREAS, the need for comprehensive, coordinated mental health services for children, youth, and families places upon our community a critical responsibility; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate that a week should be set apart each year for the direction of our thoughts toward our children’s mental health and well-being; and WHEREAS, Alamance County, through its unique approach to serving children and adolescents, is effectively caring for the mental health needs of children, youth, and families in our community; and WHEREAS, National Children’s Mental Health Awareness Week provides an important opportunity for our community to show how children and youth with mental health needs-as well as their families-
8.1
Packet Pg. 55
thrive when they have the right support and services available and that positive mental health is essential to a child’s healthy development from birth; and NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Alamance County Board of Commissioners, do hereby proclaim May 3 – 9, 2015, to be National Children’s Mental Health Awareness Week in Alamance County and we urge our citizens and all agencies and organizations interested in meeting every child’s mental health needs to unite on that day in the observance of such exercises as will acquaint the people of Alamance County with the fundamental necessity of a year-round program for children and youth with mental health needs and their families. Signed this 4th day of May 2015 ___________________________________
Dan Ingle, Chairman Attested: Alamance County Board of Commissioners __________________________ Tory Frink, Clerk to the Board
8.1
Packet Pg. 56
<
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
PROCLAMATION AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Tory Frink DATE SUBMITTED: 05/1/15
DEPT: County Clerk
RECOGNITION OF:
National Police Week 2015 & Honoring Fallen Officers
PURPOSE OF RECOGNITION:
ATTACHMENTS:
…
Proclamation
National Police Week 2015 May 10-16, 2015
To recognize National Police Week 2015 and to honor the service and sacrifice of those law
enforcement officers killed in the line of duty while protecting our communities and safeguarding our democracy.
WHEREAS, there are approximately 900,000 law enforcement officers serving in
communities across the United States, including the dedicated members of the Alamance County Sheriff’s Office;
WHEREAS, nearly 60,000 assaults against law enforcement officers are reported each year, resulting in approximately 16,000 injuries;
WHEREAS, since the first recorded death in 1791, more than 20,000 law enforcement
officers in the United States have made the ultimate sacrifice and been killed in the line of duty, including 4 members of the Alamance County Sheriff’s Office;
WHEREAS, the names of these dedicated public servants are engraved on the walls of the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial in Washington, D.C.;
WHEREAS, 273 new names of fallen heroes are being added to the National Law
Enforcement Officers Memorial this spring, including 117 officers killed in 2014 and 156 officers killed in previous years;
WHEREAS, the service and sacrifice of all officers killed in the line of duty will be honored
during the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund’s 27th Annual Candlelight Vigil, on
the evening of May 13, 2015;
8.2
Packet Pg. 57
WHEREAS, the Candlelight Vigil is part of National Police Week, which takes place this year on May 10th -16th ;
WHEREAS, May 15th is designated as Peace Officers Memorial Day, in honor of all fallen officers and their families and U.S. flags should be flown at half-staff;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Alamance County Board of Commissioners
formally designates May 10-16, 2015, as Police Week in Alamance County, and publicly salutes the service of law enforcement officers in our community and in communities across the nation.
Signed this 4th day of May 2015 Alamance County Board of Commissioners
___________________________
Dan Ingle, Chairman
Attest: ___________________________
Tory Frink, Clerk to the Board
8.2
Packet Pg. 58
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
INFORMATION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Stacie Saunders DATE SUBMITTED: 04/28/15
DEPT: Health Department
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
2014 State of the County Health Report
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Board of Health adopted the 2014 State of the County Health Report at its April 21, 2015, meeting. This
informational update will highlight key points of the report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
ACHD_SOTCH 2014_final (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
8.3
Packet Pg. 59
State Of The County Health
Report 2014
Alamance County Demographics At A Glance
Below you will find the demographics for Alamance County and the state of North Carolina according to the US Census1, The Annie E. Casey Foundation-Kids Count Data Center2, Alamance County Department of Social Services3 and the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina4. Alamance County consists of nine municipalities. Burlington is the most populated city in the county and Graham is the
County Seat and second most populated city.
Demographics Alamance County North Carolina
Population (2013 est.)1 154,378 9,848,060
White 1 75.8% 71.7%
African American1 19.3% 22.0%
Hispanic Latino1 11.8% 8.9%
Asian1 1.5% 2.6%
American Indian and Alaska Native1 1.4% 1.6%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander1 0.1% 0.1%
Median Household Income (2009-2013) 1 $43,043 $46,334
Per Capita Income (2009-2013)1 $23,166 $25,284
Persons Below Poverty Level (2009-2013) 1 18.3% 17.5%
Persons without Health Insurance (2009-2013)1 16.6% 16.2%
Children Living in Poverty (under 18yrs old) (2012) 2 29.2% 25.8%
Households that Received Food Stamps3 (September 2013) 11,919 773,720
Unemployed (November 2014) 4 5.2% 5.3%
Student Eligible for Free & Reduced School Lunch (2011-2012) 2 55.6% 56.0%
This SOTCH Report will be disseminated directly to the Alamance County Board of Health, Alamance County Board of Commissioners, Healthy Alamance Board of Directors,
Alamance County United Way, Alamance County Community Council Members, Alamance County Libraries, Alamance-Burlington Schools, and Alamance Regional Medical
Center. The information compiled in this report will be posted on the Alamance County website, www.alamance-nc.com, and the Healthy Alamance website,
www.healthyalamance.com. A press release will be issued to all local media summarizing the contents of this report. To obtain more information about this SOTCH please
contact Alamance County Health Department (336) 227-0101. To become more involved with the local initiatives, please contact Healthy Alamance (336) 513-5590.
Your time in reading this report is appreciated.
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 60
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
STATEOFTHECOUNTYHEALTHREPORTPRIORITY AREA PROGRESS
AccesstoHealthcare
Changes in Data/Trends:
The Alamance County community overwhelmingly believed that access to healthcare was a paramount health issue in 2011.
According to the 2011 Community Assessment, more than 75% of those polled believed that access to health care was very
important to the overall health of people. According to the most recent Census data, 16.6% of those living in Alamance
County are without insurance compared to 16.2% at the state level. At the time of the 2011 Community Assessment, rough-
ly 18% of Alamance County residents were uninsured. The number of physicians in the community has increased slightly
from 262 physicians in 2011 to 277 in 2012 according to the UNC Sheps Center NC Health Professions Data System (18.1
physicians per 10,000 compared to 22.3 physicians per 10,000 for the state). Alamance County’s activity efforts in this prior-
ity area have been focused on increasing access to public transportation, primarily.
Progress Made:
Transportation is clearly still an important issue to Alamance County residents as those polled consid-
ered the issue a top concern for the county, ranking it fourth in issues of importance (Elon Poll, 2014).
After discussing the transit system since the mid-2000s, the Burlington City Council unanimously voted
in June 2014 to develop a public bus transit system. The city plans to secure six buses which will travel
throughout the city and possibly extend to the towns of Elon, Gibsonville, Mebane and Graham. In
December 2014, the Burlington City Council tabled the decision to fund the transit system through $5
vehicle tax until March 2015.
Activity around the Affordable Care Act has recently become more prominent as the
2014-2015 enrollment period deadline nears. The first enrollment period of the Af-
fordable Care Act proved successful for Alamance County. At the time of the first
enrollment period, it was estimated that approximately 25,000 non-elderly individuals
were uninsured in Alamance County (NC Institute of Medicine, 2013). Of that
25,000, roughly 10,000 were believed to be eligible for Medicaid or the federal mar-
ketplace. Through a community effort of awareness, outreach and education, and
in partnership with local Legal Aid federal navigators and certified assistance coun-
selors located at area Federally Qualified Health Centers, approximately 5,000 indi-
viduals enrolled in either Medicaid or the marketplace during the first enrollment pe-
riod (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2014). This indicates that approxi-
mately 50% of those eligible successfully enrolled. As of January 16, 2015 over
6,000 individuals had already enrolled or re-enrolled in the federal marketplace
(Enroll America, 2015).
Burlington City Council Public Comment
In 2011, Alamance County conducted a community-wide assessment looking at the health and social status of residents in the
community. The assessment identified the top health concerns as indicated by the community. The priorities identified in the 2011 Com-
munity Assessment were Obesity, Access to Care, Substance Abuse, and Mental Health. The following sections update the progress
made in those four priority areas in the last year.
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 61
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
STATEOFTHECOUNTYHEALTHREPORTPRIORITY AREA PROGRESS
SubstanceAbuse
Changes in Data/Trends:
Much of the substance abuse prevention and intervention work as been centered on youth in Alamance County. Tobacco
use among minors continues to be a concerning health issue for Alamance County. At the time of the 2011 Community
Assessment, approximately 3.5% of 6th graders surveyed stated that had used tobacco products in the past 30 days (PRIDE
survey, 2009). Additionally, 28.8% of 12th graders stated that they had used tobacco in the previous days (PRIDE survey,
2009). According to the most recent PRIDE survey conducted in 2013, the percentage of 6th graders who stated they
used tobacco in the last 30 days dropped to 0.7% and 12th graders stating use of tobacco in the last 30 days dropped to
24.9% (PRIDE survey, 2013). In the past the NC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) was used to track the
smoking rates of adults in Alamance County. The last available county level data from BRFSS was 2011 and county level
data is no longer available for more recent years. The Alamance County Health Department is currently tracking smoking
rates through the County Heath Rankings. The smoking indicator in the County Health Rankings is defined as percent of
adults that report smoking greater than or equal to 100 cigarettes and are current smokers. The current smoking rate among
Alamance County adults is 24% (County Health Rankings, Alamance Snapshot, 2014). This has essentially stayed the
same compared to 23% of adults in 2011 (County Health Rankings, Alamance Snapshot, 2011).
While tobacco use among school-aged individuals appears to be
decreasing over time, the use of alcohol among the same population
has increased over that same time (see graph). Additionally, current
PRIDE data suggest there is a significant increase in 30 day use of
alcohol from middle school to high school. From 7th grade to 9th
grade, a two-year difference, there is roughly a two-fold increase in
the use of alcohol among student survey participants. In 2013,
roughly 40% of 12th graders surveyed indicated that they used alco-
hol in the last 30 days.
Progress Made:
Since the tragic death of an area high school student to accidental prescription drug mis-
use in 2011, a renewed passion and awareness for reducing the risk of prescription medi-
cine misuse has emerged. After several years of work and through a partnership of Cone
Health, Alamance Regional Medical Center, Safe Kids Alamance County, Alamance Citi-
zens for a Drug Free Community and Healthy Alamance, two permanent Medicine Drop
Boxes were installed at local police departments in August 2014. Since their installations,
the Mebane site alone has collected more than 797 pounds of expired and unused
medicine.
Health Department staff, as well as Healthy Alamance and Region V Community Transformation Grant staff, worked
throughout 2014 to change smoking policies at local multi-unit housing complexes. Approximately, 40 multi-unit housing
complexes were surveyed regarding tobacco-free policies. Six of those surveyed were smoke-free and two expressed inter-
est in implementing tobacco-free policies. Beginning October 1, 2014, those two Burlington multi-unit housing complexes will
implement 100% tobacco-free policies. In addition, the local minor league baseball park, home of the Burlington Royals,
went 100% tobacco-free for the 2014 season. This policy change will no longer allow tobacco products to be used in the
ballpark. Community Transformation Grant funds were used to assist in the purchasing of signs and tip cards for patrons.
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 62
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
STATEOFTHECOUNTYHEALTHREPORTPRIORITY AREA PROGRESS
MentalHealth
Changes in Data/Trends:
According to the 2011 Community Health Assessment, about 21% of those polled stated they did not know where they would
recommend a friend to go for mental health help. In contrast, according to a 2014 Elon Community Poll, about 10% of
respondents stated that they or someone they knew could not or did not know where to get mental health services.
According to a 2014 community poll conducted by Elon University, approximately 51% of those polled indicated that a family
member or close friend was dealing with a mental health problem (Note: similar indicator was not included in 2011 assess-
ment).
Progress Made:
Cardinal Innovations, the mental health provider in Alamance
County, hosted more than 10 Mental Health First Aid trainings to
providers in 2014. Mental Health First Aid is a full day course that
teaches community members and service providers how to help
someone they may find experiencing a mental health problem. On
May 28, DHHS Deputy Secretary Dave Richard visited Burlington
and met with trainees. At that meeting, he stated that the training
was key in helping the average person understand how to respond
to those in mental health crisis. Over 50 community members and
service providers were trained in Mental Health First Aid in 2014.
In addition to committing to mental health resources for adults, Alamance County has dedi-
cated resources to helping children and families get healthy starts from the beginning. Pro-
ject LAUNCH is the prevention arm of the early childhood behavioral health activities in
Alamance County. In 2014, Project LAUNCH trained 40 service providers in Triple P
(Positive Parenting Program). Also, the project continues to support two early childhood
mental health teams in two private pediatrician offices in the community. Through that pub-
lic-private effort, the project has reached 1148 children and families. In August 2014, Pro-
ject LAUNCH supported the development of an early childhood mental health team in the
Alamance County Health Department. Children 0-8 years and their families receiving care
or services at the health department now have access to Positive Parenting Program
(Triple P) and behavioral health services provided through a co-located family centered
navigator and licensed clinical social worker team. The early childhood mental health team
at the health department reached 208 families with Triple P in 2014.
Alamance Alliance for Children and Families is the intervention arm of the early childhood mental health activity in the com-
munity. Some achievements of the Alliance in the last year have included providing 11 trainings on early brain development
and early childhood trauma to more than 220 attendees, training 17 supervisors from 10 child-serving agencies on imple-
menting early childhood mental health core competencies with their staff, and training 10 licensed clinicians on how to com-
plete trauma informed assessments. Outcome data collected by the grant shows that by 18 months of service children
showed improved initiative and self-control, and attention and aggression problems decreased significantly by 20 percentage
points. Twenty-four month data collected from caregivers indicates less overall distress and less difficult interactions with
their children.
Mental Health First Aid ‐ May 28, 2014
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 63
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
STATEOFTHECOUNTYHEALTHREPORTPRIORITY AREA PROGRESS
Obesity Changes in Data/Trends: At the time of the 2011 Community Assessment, 18.5% of Alamance County children and
adolescents were obese according to the North Carolina Nutrition and Physical Activity Surveillance System (NC-NPASS,
2009). Unfortunately, 2009 was the last year county level data was available for all child age groups on NC NPASS. Obesity
rates of 2-4 year olds from 2009 and 2012 are still available through the data set. In 2009, 17.8% of young children ages 2-4
years were identified as obese in Alamance County. According to the 2012 NC NPASS, the most current obesity rate for 2-4
years old is 17.5%, indicating no significant change. Adult obesity rates for Alamance County are no longer available through
the NC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey; however, data is available from the County Health ranking site.
According to the 2014 County Health Rankings, 34% of Alamance County’s adult population is obese. This has slightly
increased compared to the 2011 rankings in which 31% of adults in the county were obese.
Progress made: With assistance from Community Transformation Grant funding, the cities of Burlington and Graham have
begun work on their Comprehensive Land Use plans and are including a section about health. The Alamance County Trail
Plan is also being completed with the same funding assistance. The Alamance County Trail Plan is a long-range plan that
strives to work with municipalities, citizens, business owners, and landowners to identify and prioritize opportunities to create
recreational trails throughout Alamance County. While some parts of Alamance County have ready access to recreation, ad-
ditional passive recreation options such as trails and greenways can provide numerous benefits while not over-burdening ex-
isting staff resources. The Alamance County Board of Commissioners is set to vote on the plan in January 2015. Also, in
2014, Community Transformation grant funding assisted in the enhancement of local farmers’ markets and provided promo-
tion with billboards and recipes cards for the 2014 season. In total, six farmers’ markets were impacted through the efforts
including markets in Mebane, Downtown Burlington, Haw River, North Park, Elon, and Saxapahaw.
In the last year, the Alamance County Health Department received funding through the United Way of Alamance County to
revamp the Physical Activity and Recreation Challenge (PARC) Passport program to include social media platforms as a
means to market and encourage visits to local parks. The PARC Passport program is designed to draw interest to four parks
in the county through a scavenger hunt-like activity. This year’s enhancements allowed participants to “check-in” via Four-
square and also share their adventure through Facebook. More than 150 individuals participated in the 2014 PARC Passport
challenge.
The Alamance County WIC program teamed up with the local newspaper, Burlington Times-
News, to feature healthy eating and active living guest commentaries throughout 2014.
These articles featured easy recipes to add flavor but not additional calories to the readers’
diets. Articles also encouraged healthy living through physical activity and movement in the
community.
The health department assisted Hawfields Childcare Development Center in the implementa-
tion of a preschool garden maintained by three and four year-olds attending the center. More
than 50 unduplicated children participated in the pilot program that included hands-on plant-
ing, tending, harvesting and sampling of produce. In addition, children participated in farm-to-
table activities, plant science education, healthy eating and active living activities. Prior to the
program, the facility served 5.3 fresh veggies and fruits per month and during the course of
the garden program the facility served 5.8 fresh veggies and fruits per month (indicating a
9.4% increase in fresh produce served). Flowering squash at Hawfields CDC
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 64
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
Communicable Disease and Preparedness Planning
Public health is an ever-changing landscape. More than 100 years ago,
the greatest causes of sickness and death among Americans were
infectious diseases. As vaccines and better infection controls were
introduced throughout the 20th century, chronic diseases moved to the
forefront of causes of morbidity and mortality. That being said, infectious
diseases and the preparedness procedures and prevention measures to
inhibit their spread do still make up a great deal of the work performed by
public health.
In 2014 alone, local public health workers added four new words to their
vocabulary: Chikungunya, MERS, EV-D68 and Ebola. Each of these new
emerging infections created an opportunity to expand the knowledge base
of local public health workers and those with whom they work through
continuing education, local meetings, statewide partner calls, table top
exercises, full scale exercises, webinars, and practice.
Over the last decade, public health preparedness has become
increasingly more important and prominent in local public health
departments. The role of preparedness programs is to plan and
coordinate responses to public health threats in a community. Local public
health activities include disease surveillance, public education, response
planning, and disease prevention. In Alamance County, preparedness
work includes the health department, Alamance County Emergency
Medical Services, Alamance County Emergency Management, Alamance
County Central Communications, county and municipality law
enforcement, Alamance Regional Medical Center, Cone Health System,
Alamance-Burlington School System,
and county management.
In 2014, local public health providers
and partners dedicated more than 2000
hours to public health preparedness and
response planning including weekly
partner calls and a full scale Ebola
preparedness exercise with EMS and
Cone Health System.
STATEOFTHECOUNTYHEALTHREPORTEMERGING ISSUE
Alamance County EMS participating in a preparedness exercise – November 2014
Chikungunya is a viral disease that is
transmitted to people by mosquitoes. In
late 2013, chikungunya was found for the
first time in the U.S. on islands in the
Caribbean. The most common symptoms
of chikungunya are fever and joint pain.
North Carolina reported the first travel
acquired case of the illness in June 2014.
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome
(MERS) is viral respiratory illness first
reported in Saudi Arabia in 2012. On May
2, 2014, the first U.S. imported case of
MERS was confirmed in a traveler from
Saudi Arabia to the U.S. Most people
who have been confirmed to have MERS-
CoV infection developed severe acute
respiratory illness.
Enterovirus D68 can cause mild to severe
respiratory illness. It likely spreads from
person to person when an infected per-
son coughs, sneezes, or touches a sur-
face that is then touched by others. The
most likely time of year to get infected is
in the summer and fall. Cases of EV-D68
were first confirmed in September 2014 in
North Carolina.
Ebola is a rare and deadly disease
spread primarily through direct contact
with body fluids of an infected person. In
September 2014, the CDC confirmed the
first travel-associated case of Ebola in the
US. The 2014 Ebola epidemic is the larg-
est in history. As of January 2015, more
than 21,000 individuals have been infect-
ed and more than 8400 have died world-
wide.
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 65
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
STATEOFTHECOUNTYHEALTHREPORTMORBIDITY AND MORTALITY
Leading Causes of Death (2009-2013) The top 3 leading causes of death in Alamance County (AC)
continue to be cancer, heart disease, and chronic lower
respiratory diseases. AC and North Carolina (NC) have the
same top 9 causes of death, AC has a higher overall
unadjusted death rate (per 100,000 population) when
compared to NC and the total death rate from all causes is
significantly higher in AC.
Maternal and Child Health
Alamance County 2012
North Carolina 2012
Alamance County 2013
North Carolina 2013
Infant Mortality (Rate per 1,000 Live Births)
8.5
7.4
10.1
7
Teen Pregnancy
(Rate per 1,000 Females ages 15-17)
37.1
39.6
34.9
35.2
Source: North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Reported Pregnancies 2012 & 2013 http://www.schs.state.nc.us/schs/data/pregnancies/2012/preg1519.pdf http://www.schs.state.nc.us/data/vital/pregnancies/2013/preg1519.pdf
Communicable Diseases
(rate per 100,000 population) Disease Alamance County
2012 North Carolina
2012 Alamance County
2013 North Carolina
2013
Gonorrhea 166.3 146.9 89.7 140.1
Primary & Secondary Syphilis
2.6 3.4 2.6 4.3
Source: North Carolina 2013 HIV/STD Surveillance Report http://epi.publichealth.nc.gov/cd/stds/figures/std13rpt.pdf
Unadjusted Death Rates per 100,000
Cause of Death Alamance County NC
Cancer – All Sites (1) 214.3 (1) 188.1
Heart Disease (2) 203.1 (2) 178.9
Chronic lower respiratory Diseases (3) 62.9 (3) 48.4
Cerebrovascular Disease (stroke) (4) 52.5 (4) 45.2
Alzheimer’s Disease (5) 38.8 (5) 29.9
Other Unintentional Injuries (6) 31.2 (6) 29.0
Kidney Disease (7) 27.4 (7) 23.3
Diabetes (8) 26.2 (8) 18.4
Pneumonia & influenza (9) 20.7 (9) 18.3
Septicemia (10) 17.8 (10) 14.0
Total Deaths All Causes 973.7 830.0
Source: NC State Center for Health Statistics http://www.schs.state.nc.us/schs/data/databook/
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 66
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
STATEOFTHECOUNTYHEALTHREPORTNEW INITIATIVES
Alamance Baby Closet The Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies Coalition of Alamance County is creating a brand
new Baby Closet! The Alamance Baby Closet (ABC) is located at the Alamance
County Health Department and is designed to promote active participation in prenatal
care among pregnant women, as well as engaging in healthy behaviors during preg-
nancy through education. Clients can earn points to spend in the Baby Closet by
keeping their prenatal appointments, participating in Centering, bringing their baby in
for well-baby check-ups after delivery, breastfeeding, and coming in for their post-
partum visits. This program is completely free to clients and made possible by the
generous donations of our community partners!
Safe Kids Alamance County Safe Kids Alamance County is a coalition of public and private agencies committed to
the reduction and elimination of preventable childhood injuries in children 0-19 years of
age. Beginning in 2014, the Alamance County Health Department now serves as the
lead agency for the Safe Kids Alamance County Coalition. Around the world, a child
dies from an unintentional injury every 30 seconds, and millions of children are injured
in ways that can affect them for a lifetime. Safe Kids Alamance County is dedicated to
preventing injuries in children, the number one killer of kids in the United States.
Every year in North Carolina, approximately 200 children die from accidental injuries
and another 45,000 visit a doctor's office for treatment of such injuries (Safe Kids
Worldwide, 2015). These injuries can be prevented.
Early Childhood Literacy Environments In 2014, the Alamance County Health Department implemented Literacy-Rich Waiting
Rooms for children and families served. The implementation was based on the Reach
Out and Read national model. The first five years of a child’s life are critical in the
growth and development of emotion and cognition. Children that experience little or
insufficient exposure to language and reading are more likely to arrive at kindergarten
without basic literacy skills and those arriving to kindergarten not ready are more likely
to perform poorly in school. The long reaching effects of poor school performance can
have a lasting impact on social, emotional, financial and physical health for individuals
and families.
The literacy rich waiting rooms provide children and families an opportunity to explore
books and materials that promote parent-child relationships, support early literacy, and
support healthy brain development. Children and families are provided age appropri-
ate books at well-child visits and are also encouraged to take books home that they
enjoy. In 2014, more than 552 books were distributed to children through the health
department’s program.
Safe Kids Alamance County Activities
S’more Dangerous than You
Think: An initiative to raise aware-
ness about hyperthermia and the
dangers of leaving children alone
in a car, even for just a minute.
International Walk to School
Day and Be Safe Be Seen on
Halloween: These are events to
help raise awareness about
pedestrian safety.
Car Seat Safety: Help to educate
the community, new parents, and
child care providers on the
importance of children being
buckled up!
Fire Safety: Provide support and
incentives for fire safety initiatives
throughout the year including
receiving a grant from Kidde to
install smoke detectors in homes.
Cuddly Comforts: A stuffed
animal collection drive to donate to
first responders to give to children
in crisis situations.
Poison Prevention: Safe Kids
Alamance County is proud to have
partnered with Alamance Citizens
for a Drug Free Community and
Alamance Regional Medical
Center to install two permanent
medication drop boxes.
Home Safety: The Coalition
partnered with Burlington Junior
Women’s Club to raise awareness
about the dangers of TV and
Furniture tip-overs in the home.
Bike Safety: Safe Kids partnered
with Safe Routes to School who
donated over 90 bike helmets for a
back to school event in August.
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 67
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
319 N. Graham-Hopedale Rd. Suite B
Burlington, NC 27217
Like us oIf you would like further information or would like to be involved in health activities, please call Alamance County Health Department
at (336) 227-0101 or Healthy Alamance at (336) 513-5590.
STATEOFTHECOUNTYHEALTHREPORTANNUAL PERFORMANCE NUMBERS
Find Healthy Alamance at HealthyAlamance.com or
Call (336) 513-5590 or
Like us on Facebook
Alamance County Health Department 319 N. Graham-Hopedale Rd. Suite B
Burlington, NC 27217 (336) 227-0101
Find us at
Alamance-nc.com/d/health.com or
Like us on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter at #ACHealthDept
2013 2014
Total Immunizations 3,904
WIC Counseling Sessions 14,227 9,596 (January-August 2014)
Family Planning Visits 4,923
Maternity Clinic Visits 4,646
Child Health Visits 269
Dental Clinic Visits 7,468 7,424
HIV Tests 3,567
STD Clinic Visits 3,078
Care Coordination Contacts 8,021
Total Flu Vaccine Administered 2,441 2,105
Environmental Health Inspections 2,011 2,010
Health Hazard Inpections 228 210
Well Inspections 121 128
Rabies Vaccinations 457 253
Soil/Site Evaluations 285 344
Collected Water Samples 788 628
Specimen for Rabies Collected 45 44
Environmental Health Community Trainings 63 25
Health Education Encounters 5,700 5,794
Health Education Grants Received $62,854 $5,300.25
Lab Test Performed
State Lab
In House
Lab Corp
Healthy Alamance
2013 2014
Total Immunizations 3,904
WIC Counseling Sessions 14,227 9,596 (January-August 2014)
Family Planning Visits 4,923
Maternity Clinic Visits 4,646
Child Health Visits 269
Dental Clinic Visits 7,468 7,424
HIV Tests 3,567
STD Clinic Visits 3,078
Care Coordination Contacts 8,021
Total Flu Vaccine Administered 2,441 2,105
Environmental Health Inspections 2,011 2,010
Health Hazard Inpections 228 210
Well Inspections 121 128
Rabies Vaccinations 457 253
Soil/Site Evaluations 285 344
Collected Water Samples 788 628
Specimen for Rabies Collected 45 44
Environmental Health Community Trainings 63 25
Health Education Encounters 5,700 5,794
Health Education Grants Received $62,854 $5,300.25
Lab Test Performed
State Lab
In House
Lab Corp
Healthy Alamance
2013 2014
Total Immunizations 3,904 3,818
WIC Counseling Sessions 14,227 9,596 (January-August 2014)
Family Planning Visits 4,923 4,276
Maternity Clinic Visits 4,646 4,250
Child Health Visits 269 224
Dental Clinic Visits 7,468 7,424
HIV Tests 3,567 3,483
STD Clinic Visits 3,078 3,083
Care Coordination Contacts 8,021 8,490
Total Flu Vaccine Administered 2,441 2,105
Environmental Health Inspections 2,011 2,010
Health Hazard Inpections 228 210
Well Inspections 121 128
Rabies Vaccinations 457 253
Soil/Site Evaluations 285 344
Collected Water Samples 788 628
Specimen for Rabies Collected 45 44
Environmental Health Community Trainings 63 25
Health Education Encounters 5,700 5,794
Health Education Grants Received $62,854 $5,300
Lab Test Performed
State Lab 4,053 9,714
In House 8,200 7,692
Lab Corp 6,898 6,618
Healthy Alamance 9,721 *Data unavailable at time of printing
8.3.a
Packet Pg. 68
Att
ach
men
t: A
CH
D_S
OT
CH
201
4_fi
nal
(13
73 :
Sta
te o
f th
e C
ou
nty
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
201
4)
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
ACTION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Alamance County Board of Commissioners MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Craig Honeycutt DATE SUBMITTED: 04/28/15
DEPT: County Manager
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of NCDOT's planned transportation project that is excess of $150,000. See attached email from Mike
Mills, NCDOT.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION: CONCUR
ATTACHMENTS:
Request for resolution for Governor Scott Farm Rd (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
8.4
Packet Pg. 69
1
Tory Frink
From: Craig HoneycuttSent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 2:13 PMTo: Tory FrinkSubject: RE: Resolution for Governor Scott Farm Road
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Mills, James M" <[email protected]> Date: 04/23/2015 1:51 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Craig Honeycutt <[email protected]> Subject: Resolution for Governor Scott Farm Road
Craig: This is to advise that in accordance with Article 1 of Chapter 135 of North Carolina General Statutes, the Department of Transportation shall inform all municipalities and/or counties affected by a planned transportation project that is in excess of $150,000. In accordance with the statute, this is to notify you that the Department of Transportation is proposing to participate in the construction of the following project with Alamance County: Grade, drain, Base and Pave Governor Scott Farm Road to Industrial Road Standards from
Cherry Lane (SR 2123) to Kimrey Road (SR 2125). This is to provide an industrial road to serve as a secondary access to the proposed distribution center known as “Project Quarter”
I would appreciate your placing this on the agenda for the County Commissioners to review, and if approved, submitting a resolution back to this office. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thanks, Mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
8.4.a
Packet Pg. 70
Att
ach
men
t: R
equ
est
for
reso
luti
on
fo
r G
ove
rno
r S
cott
Far
m R
d (
1374
: A
pp
rova
l of
a P
lan
ned
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n P
roje
ct-
Go
v. S
cott
Far
m R
d)
Alamance County Board of Commissioners
ACTION ITEM AGENDA ITEM
TO: Craig Honeycutt, County Manager MEETING DATE: 05/4/15
FROM: Craig Honeycutt DATE SUBMITTED: 05/1/15
DEPT: County Manager
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Inter-local agreement with the Tourism Development Authority (TDA).
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION: CONCUR
ATTACHMENTS:
5-1-15 TDA Inter-local Agmt (PDF)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
9.1
Packet Pg. 71
9.1.a
Packet Pg. 72
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-1-1
5 T
DA
Inte
r-lo
cal A
gm
t (
1376
: T
DA
Inte
r-lo
cal A
gre
emen
t)
9.1.a
Packet Pg. 73
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-1-1
5 T
DA
Inte
r-lo
cal A
gm
t (
1376
: T
DA
Inte
r-lo
cal A
gre
emen
t)
9.1.a
Packet Pg. 74
Att
ach
men
t: 5
-1-1
5 T
DA
Inte
r-lo
cal A
gm
t (
1376
: T
DA
Inte
r-lo
cal A
gre
emen
t)