advisory council for aviation research and innovation in europe acare member states group view and...
TRANSCRIPT
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in EuropeAdvisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe
ACARE Member States Group
View and national examples
26th of June 2014 - General Assembly
Apr 21, 2023
1
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe
Member States
• The Member States are committed to achieve Flightpath 2050 and have embarked on the SRIA– Several national initiatives are aligned with the SRIA
• The Member States are actively involved– a specific Member States group– ACARE is the only ETP having such direct involvement
• Efforts are undertaken to achieve a global level playing field for Aviation
• ?? Line on EASA, Eurocontrol??
04/21/23 2
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe 04/21/23 3
Examples of national inivatives: Sweden
http://www.nriaflyg.se/
NRIA = National Strategy National view on Innovation System for Aerospace
4
CORAC Council for Civil Aeronautics Research
CORAC Council• A national mirror platform to the ACARE technology platform• Council created in 2008
Under the chairmanship of the Minister for Transports
Gathers all stakeholders in Civil Aeronautics and Air Transport• Airlines, airports, air navigation service providers, Aircraft
manufacturers, engine, systems and equipment suppliers, institutions & professional associations, research establishment ONERA, all Ministries concerned by Aviation research (Research, Defence, Industry and Finance, Ecology and Transport)
French strategy in terms of aviation research• Very much aligned with the ACARE Strategic Research• CORAC research roadmaps consistent and complementary
Pursue ACARE ambitious objective by 2020 (and 2050)• To reduce the perceived noise by a factor 2 by 2020• To reduce aircraft carbon dioxide emissions by half• To reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by 80%
France
Austria: Take Off funding – according to segments
MitarbeiterInnen
Ranked 15!
Total Take Off funding: ~ 62 million €
142 projects in total
6 (21/04/23)UNIÓN EUROPEAFondo Europeo deDesarrollo Regional (FEDER)
Una manera de hacer Europa
AERONAUTICS thematic areas Vs national funded projects ≈ EUR 500 million direct funding between 2006-2012
Spain: CDTI support to aeronautics R&D
Finnish Transport Safety Agency
FINLAND: Reduction of the environmental impact of aircraft de-icing fluidsIcewing programme 2011-2015 Generic Airbus type 3 element airfoil with
wing tank cooling Wind tunnel testing of fluid effects Wind tunnel testing of real frost effects Budget 420000€
Real frost
The Netherlands: Road Map for Thermoplastic Components
A380 outboard
fixed leading edge
First large scale
assembly:Welded fixed wing leading edges A340
CVO
CVO
First Induction welded control
surfaces G650
First series production:
Fairchild Dornier ribs
VTP
First welded
assembly:MUC door
Fo50
VTP
First primary
structure: Gulfstr
pressure floors
CVO
‘TAPAS2’
TAPASSRP’s
TAPAS2Budget 23 M€40% gov. loan
2017201320001990 2010
Lower Weight up to -20%
Labour Cost up to -40%
SRIA Relevance
High Automation Possible
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe
Funding schemes in Member States
04/21/23 9
AT Take Off €62 mio Total funding 2002-2013
DE LuFoup to €170
mio annually, 2014-17HU USZT n/a PL PBS n/a UK NATEP ca. €27.5 mio annually
UK ATI ca. €179 mioannually, for a 7-year period
ITIncl. some
regional funds Various €80 mio 2014 & 2015ES ca. €500 mio 2006-2012
FR Corac National Strategic
PlatformNL TO2 funding ca. €16 mio 2014
NLPublic & Private
Funds
Innovation Contract
Aeronautics ca. €57 mio 2014-2016
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe
Conclusion
• Several funding opportunities for aviation research exist in member states, however national research funds suffer from the financial crises
• In addition funding for aviation under Horizon 2020 is mainly focused on large closer to the market initiatives such as Clean Sky and SESAR
• National funds can not compensate for the gap that exists for lower TRL level research
• As a result of this gap, the European leadership is in jeopardy and may have the consequence of Europe not achieving the ACARE SRIA high level objectives
• Regional and structural funds are an area still underexplored
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe
Recommendations
• National/regional/structural funding programmes follow a different technical and political agenda and have different governance structures
• This represents a challenge for both the European Commission, Clean Sky, SESAR and the Member States
• Alignment and synergies between different funds may be strengthened with the help of private (regional) stakeholders
• The Member States recommend to investigate potential synergies between Horizon 2020, EU Structural funds and/or national and regional funds.