advanced seismic imaging for geothermal development

49
Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada John N. Louie University of Nevada, Reno Satish Pullammanappallil Bill Honjas Optim Inc. www.seismo.unr.edu/~louie optimsoftware.com Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Upload: udell

Post on 24-Feb-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development. John N. Louie University of Nevada, Reno Satish Pullammanappallil Bill Honjas Optim Inc. www.seismo.unr.edu/~louie optimsoftware.com. “Integrative” versus “Differential” Geophysical Methods. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

John N. LouieUniversity of Nevada, Reno

Satish PullammanappallilBill HonjasOptim Inc.

www.seismo.unr.edu/~louie

optimsoftware.com

Advanced Seismic Imagingfor Geothermal Development

Page 2: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

“Integrative” versus “Differential”Geophysical Methods

Grav, Mag, MT, Refraction integrate over volumes

Seismic Reflection & Radar image point changes

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Page 3: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Problem: Applying Seismic Exploration for Geothermal Projects

“Cornerstone” of oil & gas exploration and development… …But until recently, not used for geothermal projects

Lateral complexity prevented accurate velocity modeling Lack of accurate velocity models prevented focusing of reflection

data Lack of focused reflectors equals poor seismic image Poor seismic image results in lack of “added value” proposition

These problems deprived the geothermal industry of the basic means for economically mapping the subsurface.

Page 4: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Solution: Solve the velocity problem

Simulated Annealing Velocity Optimization Researched at the University of Nevada Seismological

Laboratory during the early 1990’s Commercially developed and released by Optim, under

the name SeisOpt® in 1998

SeisOpt iterates through hundreds of thousands of possible velocity solutions to find the single, or “global”, solution that best fits the seismic data, assuming no direction or magnitude of velocity gradient.

Page 5: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Advanced Seismic Technology Proven effectiveness of advanced processing techniques

Build on success of a DOE-funded pilot study in Dixie Valley (Honjas et al., 1997; Grant Number DE-FG07-97ID13465)

Optim has projects underway now at geothermal fields worldwide Utilize new data acquisition parameters

Designed to enhance results from advanced processing techniques• Image permeable structures at reservoir depth and image tectonic structures

beneath geothermal fields Constrain down-dip geometry of reservoir structures

Characterize features that are significant for evaluating subsurface permeability

Correlate down-dip geometry of features mapped on the surface Image tectonic structures

To determine their relationship to faults and fractures controlling the reservoir permeability and production

Page 6: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Advanced Processing Techniques

Nonlinear velocity optimization Simulated annealing method to produce high

resolution velocity models from first arrivals picked off raw shot gathers

Refraction – Integrative

Pre-stack Kirchhoff depth migration Directly images subsurface structures oriented in

any direction Reflection – Differential

Page 7: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Advantages ofPre-stack Kirchhoff Migration

Minimal pre-processing No need for numerous pre-processing steps common to

conventional seismic data processing Savings on man hours

Directly images structures in depth Uses velocity models from the optimization technique to place

reflectors in their correct location Avoids unreliable, time to depth conversion, common in

conventional data processing Images structures oriented in any direction

Can handle velocity variations in any direction Can image flat and moderate to steeply dipping structures Ideal for imaging in areas with extensive faulting and fracturing

Page 8: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

SeisOpt® Analysis of Seismic Data for Geothermal Projects

Seismic exploration is necessary for increasing the feasibility of geothermal projects

As an example, volumetric depth models of earth structure have been produced encompassing an 11 square mile area, to a depth of 15,000 feet, at less than half the cost of a single exploration drill hole

Volumetric depth model can be used to reduce risk and increase productivity in all phases of geothermal development• Exploration• Production• Resource management

Page 9: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Geothermal Project Case Studies Dixie Valley, Churchill County, Nevada

Production and Resource Management – Integrative

Coso geothermal field, Inyo County, California Exploration and Resource Management – Integrative

Pumpernickel Valley, Nevada Exploration – Differential

Astor Pass, Pyramid Lake, Nevada Exploration – Differential

Page 10: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Dixie Valley Geothermal Field:Production and Resource Management

Map showing location of production and injection wells relative to seismic lines. Data along these lines were re-processed using SeisOpt®

technology

Page 11: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Optimized Velocity Model

Page 12: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Dixie 2.5D Model

• Further analysis of production related structure revealed a basin-ward synform, or half graben, that directly correlated with location of production and injection wells.

• Velocity analysis also revealed less dramatic basinward structure in area of Line 10.

Page 13: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Velocity Tomography Depth Migration

Page 14: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Gravity and Seismic Data, Dixie Valley, NV.

Map showing surface projection of structure derived from seismic survey (Solid lines).

Independent gravity data are also shown as shaded areas, with northwest dipping structure from gravity data shown as hachured areas and southeast dipping structure by stippled areas.

The gravity and seismic data correlate well.

Gravity Data courtesy of Dr. Dave Blackwell, SMU

Page 15: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Velocity Tomography + Depth Migration

Page 16: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Velocity Tomography + Depth Migration

Okaya & Thompson, 1985

Page 17: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Dixie Valley ConclusionsA previously unknown basin-ward half graben

located by seismic data correlates with production and injection wells within the Dixie

Valley geothermal field.

The half-graben was incorporated into the Dixie Valley field injection and production model

Its presence was then confirmed via well tracer tests The seismic survey settled a basic controversy on

whether production and injection within the Dixie Valley field was related solely to the Dixie Valley fault, or controlled by basin-ward structures

The true source of production was unknown prior to revisiting the seismic data with advanced methods.

Page 18: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

NBMG Map 151

Dixie Valley

The low-angle fault is why there is no resource to the south!

Page 19: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Southern Dixie Valley

The low-angle fault may not tap deep enough into the crust to channel geothermal fluids.

Page 20: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Geothermal Project Case Studies Dixie Valley, Churchill County, Nevada

Production and Resource Management – Integrative

Coso geothermal field, Inyo County, California Exploration and Resource Management – Integrative

Pumpernickel Valley, Nevada Exploration – Differential

Astor Pass, Pyramid Lake, Nevada Exploration – Differential

Page 21: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Coso Geothermal Field: Exploration and Resource Development

Generalized geologic map showing the study area. Modified from Duffield and Bacon, 1979.

Page 22: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Optimized Velocity Model

Reservoir boundaries

Page 23: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Coso 2.5D Volumetric Model

• Interpolate between velocities along individual 2D lines

• Reveals 3D geometry of features observed along 2D lines

Page 24: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Coso 2.5D Volumetric Model

Slices through the 3D volume reveal the emergence of distinctive zones of permeability within the geothermal field. Unlike other geophysical methods, SeisOpt reveals target depth.

2000 foot slice 2500 foot slice 3000 foot slice

3500 foot slice 4000 foot slice

Page 25: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Coso: Prestack Kirchhoff Migration

West WestEast East

Page 26: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Coso ConclusionsThe seismic survey identified discrete thermal reservoir

areas within the Coso geothermal field.

Defined boundaries of two distinct reservoirs within a volcanic pile

Imaged brittle-ductile transition Predicted orientation and location of fracture

system Imaged deep, “bright lens” reflector which is

thought to be created by high-temperature thermal brines.

Page 27: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Conclusions of Early Projects Seismic exploration can be used to reduce risk and increase

productivity in all phases of geothermal development Exploration Production Resource management

Seismic exploration is economic and feasible Significant added value Cost effective, providing a volumetric model encompassing several square

miles, and extending to depths of exceeding 8,000 feet, for less than 1/2 the cost of a single exploration drill hole

Seismic exploration is the only geophysical method that can directly sample the subsurface to depths exceeding 8,000 feet

Can be used to calibrate and corroborate MT and gravity data.

Page 28: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Geothermal Project Case Studies Dixie Valley, Churchill County, Nevada

Production and Resource Management – Integrative

Coso geothermal field, Inyo County, California Exploration and Resource Management – Integrative

Pumpernickel Valley, Nevada Exploration – Differential

Astor Pass, Pyramid Lake, Nevada Exploration – Differential

Page 29: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley, Nevada

Page 30: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Raw

Record

Page 31: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Velocity Line 3

Page 32: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Prestack Migrated Line 3

Page 33: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Preliminary Line 3

Page 34: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Velocity Line 4

Page 35: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Prestack Migrated Line 4

Page 36: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Preliminary Line 4

Page 37: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Velocity Line 5

Page 38: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Prestack Migrated Line 5

Page 39: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley Preliminary Line 5

Page 40: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley -

Preliminary interpretation of

seismic data

5

4

3

Only the range-front fault is

manifested at the surface

Page 41: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel Valley, Nevada

Preliminary fault traces based on

seismic only

Page 42: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Pumpernickel ConclusionsThe seismic survey imaged hidden basin-ward step

faults directly as seismic reflectors.

Network of 2-D lines explored prospect at a fraction of the cost of 3-D

Acquisition specially designed for best SeisOpt® velocity results

Good velocity info allowed imaging faults and alluvial stratigraphy

NGP is proceeding with drilling soon

Page 43: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Geothermal Project Case Studies Dixie Valley, Churchill County, Nevada

Production and Resource Management – Integrative

Coso geothermal field, Inyo County, California Exploration and Resource Management – Integrative

Pumpernickel Valley, Nevada Exploration – Differential

Astor Pass, Pyramid Lake, Nevada Exploration – Differential

Page 44: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Astor Pass: 2-D WAZ Acquisition Upper 2 km 10-25 m V.R. Up to 240

channels

Lines 2-7 km long Source-receiver

spacing 17-67 m

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Page 45: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Astor Pass: Fault

Discoverywith

Direct Fault-Plane

Images

Page 46: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Astor Pass: Imaging Volcanic Stratigraphy

Page 47: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Now that we have direct fault images, we can analyze:

Seismic attributes- amplitude, phase, frequency, edges, shadows, etc.

AVO- amplitude versus offset, Poisson’s ratio

AVA- amplitude versus azimuth, fracture orientation

Seismic inversion- separate Dr, Dl, Dm

Page 48: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Astor Pass ConclusionsThe seismic survey discovered new fault sets.

Fault-plane image quality depends on survey orientation- 3-D imaging in process

Excellent imaging of Tertiary volcanic stratigraphy- domes versus flows

Faults and stratigraphy verified from new wells

Fault imaging allows seismic attribute, AVO analysis of geothermal reservoir

Page 49: Advanced Seismic Imaging for Geothermal Development

Copyright © 1998-2011 Optim Inc. and University of Nevada

Nevada Is Looking for anAsst. Professor of Geological Engineering https://www.unrsearch.com/postings/9727 The Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering seeks a full

time tenure-track assistant professor of Geological Engineering. The chosen candidate must be committed to both undergraduate and

graduate instruction and will be expected to develop an externally funded program of research in their specialty.

Specialty areas are open, but existing and emerging critical needs for the State of Nevada include:

Geothermal resource development Hydrologic and geohydrologic resource development and conservation Minerals and minerals industry sustainability, and Recognition and mitigation of geological hazards.

Minimum requirements are Ph.D. completion and at least one degree in geological engineering or a closely related engineering discipline.

Application deadline November 21, 2011 !