acute hypertension in intracerebral hemorrhage: pathophysiology and treatment

6
Acute hypertension in intracerebral hemorrhage: Pathophysiology and treatment Qaisar A. Shah a, , Mustapha A. Ezzeddine b , Adnan I. Qureshi a a Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States b Department of Neurology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, United States Available online 5 June 2007 Abstract Non-traumatic or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is defined as intra-parenchymal bleeding with or without extension into the ventricles and rarely into the subarachoid space. Primary ICH in most cases is associated with chronic hypertension. Acute hypertension is associated with hematoma expansion, and poor neurological outcome. The treatment of hypertension in acute ICH is a topic of controversy. Experiments have shown an area of ischemia around the hematoma, with the reduction of regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) secondary to compression of microvasculature. Not all scientific results agree with the above findings. Recent studies have shown that CBF decreases in the perihematoma region but with concomitant reduction of cerebral metabolism, which would argue against an area of ischemia in the perihematoma region. Based on the above result, there have been several clinical trials looking at clinical outcome and decrease in hematoma expansion rates with reduction of blood pressure acutely after ICH. The parameters for the blood pressure control are still under investigation. The American Heart Association has put forward guidelines for blood pressure control which have been adopted in the centers around the country. We have described the protocol we use at our center for the blood pressure control in patients with acute ICH. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Intracerebral hemorrhage; Mean arterial pressure; Hypertension; Nicardipine; American Heart Association; Hematoma expansion; Cerebral blood flow; Intracranial pressure 1. Epidemiology Non-traumatic or spontaneous ICH is defined as intra- parenchymal bleeding with or without extension into the ventricles and rarely into the subarachoid space. Sponta- neous ICH accounts for 1015% of all cases of stroke and could be classified as primary or secondary [1]. Primary ICH is mostly the result of chronic hypertension and amyloid angiopathy, and accounts for almost 7888% of cases [2]. Secondary ICH could be the result of underlying vascular malformation, coagulation abnormalities, or intracranial tumors. Worldwide incidence of ICH ranges from 10 to 20 cases per 100,000 population [3], and is estimated to affect approximately 37,000 to 52,000 people every year in the United States [4]. The mortality from ICH within the first month ranges from 44% to 51% and at 2 years post-ictus from 56% to 61% [5,6]. Elevated blood pressure is common after stroke particu- larly ICH. Wallace and Levy [7] reported elevated blood pressure in two-thirds of the study patients with acute stroke and spontaneous reduction within 10 days without any antihypertensive treatment [7,8]. Subsequent studies have confirmed the high prevalence of elevated blood pressure among patients with acute stroke [9,10]. In a large cross- sectional study, Qureshi et al. [11] reported elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) 140 mm Hg in 63% of stroke patients, in stroke subtypes the proportion of patients with elevated SBP 140 mm Hg were as follows: ischemic stroke 67%, ICH 75% and subarachnoid hemorrhage 100%. Prevalence of various blood pressure in ICH were as follows; SBP between 140 and 184 mm Hg were 50%, Journal of the Neurological Sciences 261 (2007) 74 79 www.elsevier.com/locate/jns Corresponding author. University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Tel.: +1 612 626 6519; fax: +1 612 625 7950. E-mail address: [email protected] (Q.A. Shah). 0022-510X/$ - see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2007.04.036

Upload: qaisar-a-shah

Post on 28-Nov-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

ences 261 (2007) 74–79www.elsevier.com/locate/jns

Journal of the Neurological Sci

Acute hypertension in intracerebral hemorrhage:Pathophysiology and treatment

Qaisar A. Shah a,⁎, Mustapha A. Ezzeddine b, Adnan I. Qureshi a

a Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United Statesb Department of Neurology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, United States

Available online 5 June 2007

Abstract

Non-traumatic or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is defined as intra-parenchymal bleeding with or without extension into theventricles and rarely into the subarachoid space. Primary ICH in most cases is associated with chronic hypertension. Acute hypertension isassociated with hematoma expansion, and poor neurological outcome. The treatment of hypertension in acute ICH is a topic of controversy.Experiments have shown an area of ischemia around the hematoma, with the reduction of regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) secondary tocompression of microvasculature. Not all scientific results agree with the above findings. Recent studies have shown that CBF decreases inthe perihematoma region but with concomitant reduction of cerebral metabolism, which would argue against an area of ischemia in theperihematoma region. Based on the above result, there have been several clinical trials looking at clinical outcome and decrease in hematomaexpansion rates with reduction of blood pressure acutely after ICH. The parameters for the blood pressure control are still under investigation.The American Heart Association has put forward guidelines for blood pressure control which have been adopted in the centers around thecountry. We have described the protocol we use at our center for the blood pressure control in patients with acute ICH.© 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Intracerebral hemorrhage; Mean arterial pressure; Hypertension; Nicardipine; American Heart Association; Hematoma expansion; Cerebral bloodflow; Intracranial pressure

1. Epidemiology

Non-traumatic or spontaneous ICH is defined as intra-parenchymal bleeding with or without extension into theventricles and rarely into the subarachoid space. Sponta-neous ICH accounts for 10–15% of all cases of stroke andcould be classified as primary or secondary [1]. Primary ICHis mostly the result of chronic hypertension and amyloidangiopathy, and accounts for almost 78–88% of cases [2].Secondary ICH could be the result of underlying vascularmalformation, coagulation abnormalities, or intracranialtumors. Worldwide incidence of ICH ranges from 10 to 20cases per 100,000 population [3], and is estimated to affect

⁎ Corresponding author. University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware StreetSE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Tel.: +1 612 626 6519; fax: +1612 625 7950.

E-mail address: [email protected] (Q.A. Shah).

0022-510X/$ - see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.jns.2007.04.036

approximately 37,000 to 52,000 people every year in theUnited States [4]. The mortality from ICH within the firstmonth ranges from 44% to 51% and at 2 years post-ictusfrom 56% to 61% [5,6].

Elevated blood pressure is common after stroke particu-larly ICH. Wallace and Levy [7] reported elevated bloodpressure in two-thirds of the study patients with acute strokeand spontaneous reduction within 10 days without anyantihypertensive treatment [7,8]. Subsequent studies haveconfirmed the high prevalence of elevated blood pressureamong patients with acute stroke [9,10]. In a large cross-sectional study, Qureshi et al. [11] reported elevated systolicblood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mm Hg in 63% of strokepatients, in stroke subtypes the proportion of patients withelevated SBP≥140 mm Hg were as follows: ischemic stroke67%, ICH 75% and subarachnoid hemorrhage 100%.Prevalence of various blood pressure in ICH were asfollows; SBP between 140 and 184 mm Hg were 50%,

75Q.A. Shah et al. / Journal of the Neurological Sciences 261 (2007) 74–79

SBP between 185 and 219 mm Hg were 17%, SBPN220 mm Hg were 3%.

Elevation of the blood pressure has been associatedwith poorclinical outcomes including death or dependency [10].Dandapani et al. [12] in their retrospective review of 87 patientswith ICH showed marked elevation of blood pressure onadmission and persistent inadequate blood pressure controlwereassociated with poor clinical outcome. There was significantlyhigher mortality in patients with SBP N145 mm Hg.

2. Pathophysiology

Under normal circumstances, brain can tolerate widerange of variations in blood pressure. The change inarteriolar diameter is responsible for autoregulation. Thearterioles usually vasoconstrict during increase in bloodpressure and vasodilate during decrease in blood pressure.This change in vessel diameter maintains normal CBF underwide cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) ranges. The auto-regulatory range for mean arterial pressure (MAP) isconsidered to range from 50 to 150 mm Hg. With chronichypertension there is a shift in the curve to the right. Thus,there is a potential risk of ischemic brain injury with suddendecrease in CPP below the lower limit of autoregulationparticularly in patients with chronic untreated hypertension.

The underlying reason for high blood pressure in strokepatients is not absolutely clear. There have been severaldifferent explanations. Majority of stroke patients, particu-larly patients with ICH have chronic hypertension andelevation at the time of admission is merely a reflection ofthe untreated hypertension [13]. It could also be a reactionfrom compression of the brain stem, also known asCushing–Kocher response, in order to maintain cerebralperfusion [4,14]. Stress response leading to abnormalsympathetic activity, altered parasympathetic activity, raisedlevels of circulating catecholamines [15], and brain natriure-tic peptide may also contribute to hypertension acutely [16].

3. Theoretical principles for blood pressure management

The treatment of acute hypertension in patients with ICHis highly controversial, as the effect of pharmacologicalreduction of MAP on CBF is unclear. It has been shown inthe animal studies by Nath et al. [17] and Bullock et al. [18]that there is a transient decrease in CBF in all brain regions,with lowest CBF recorded in the perihematoma region. Thiswas postulated to be the result of compression effect on theneighboring microvasculature, leading to local ischemia andacidosis. Auto-regulation may be disrupted in the perihema-toma, thus decreasing the blood pressure and impairing theCBF, and subsequently provoke ischemia. Also autoregula-tory vasodilation of cerebral vessels as a reaction to systemicblood pressure reduction may increase intracranial pressure(ICP) ultimately reducing the CPP [19].

Although not all experiments agrees with the abovefindings, Qureshi et al. [20] demonstrated no change in CBF,

cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2), and oxygenextraction fraction (OEF) in dogs despite elevation of bothICP and MAP after ICH. Subsequent studies by Hirano et al.[21] and Carhuapoma et al. [22] has shown no ischemia in theperihematoma region by using positron emission tomogra-phy (PET) and diffusion weighted image (DWI), respec-tively. Zazulia et al. [23] studied patients within the first 24 hafter ICH onset using positron emission tomography (PET)scan, and were able to demonstrate no significant reductionof CBF, CMRO2, or OEF. The above studies argue againstthe possibility of ischemia in the perihematoma region. Theexplanation of the reduced blood flow and reducedmetabolism in the perihematoma is unclear; one explanationinvolves toxic effect of the blood to the perihematomacausing decrease in the metabolism [17,24,25].

There have been three phases described for CBF andmetabolic changes in the peri-hematoma region based onrecent laboratory and clinical studies [26]. A hibernationphase is seen during the first 48 h. This phase is described bya reduction in CBF and metabolism, in both ipsilateral andcontralateral hemispheres. This has also been proven byusing PET scan, demonstrating decrease CBF and OEF [23].A reperfusion phase is seen between 48 h and 14 days. Thisconsists of a heterogeneous pattern, including areas ofnormal, hypo- and hyper-cerebral perfusion. The normal-ization phase is observed after 14 days and consists ofnormal blood flow except in non-viable tissue (Fig. 1). Basedon this assumption, blood pressure reduction in the period ofhibernation should be relatively safe.

The hematoma expansion is a dynamic process and bothfrom animal and human studies it has been shown toprogress for first 24 h, with the greatest expansion being inthe first 6 h [27–29]. The initial elevated blood pressure hasbeen clearly associated with poor clinical outcome but itsrelationship with hematoma expansion is still unclear. Therehas been some limited clinical studies showing increasedrisk of hematoma expansion in patients having elevatedinitial blood pressures [30], but it is unclear whether theelevated blood pressure predisposes patients to the expan-sion of the hematoma or is a consequence of this event. Theblood pressure control for the prevention of hematomaexpansion is currently under study. The current clinical trialwith the use of ultra-early hemostatic therapy withrecombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIA) has shown toreduce the hematoma expansion, reduce mortality andimprove clinical outcome at 3 months [31]. But this studydid not specifically look at the change in blood pressure andits effect on hematoma expansion. Overall, the literature issupporting controlled reduction of blood pressure in theacute period of ICH.

4. American Heart Association guidelines

The American Heart Association (AHA) guidelinesrecommend controlling of the blood pressure tailored tothe individual factors, such as chronic hypertension, ICP,

Fig. 1. Different phases of the cerebral blood flow and metabolism in the perihematoma. rCBF: regional cerebral blood flow. Reprinted with permission fromElsevier. Qureshi et al. [26].

76 Q.A. Shah et al. / Journal of the Neurological Sciences 261 (2007) 74–79

age, mechanism of hemorrhage, and time interval sinceonset. MAP should be maintained between 90 and130 mm Hg [32]. In patients with elevated ICP who havean ICP monitor, CPP should be kept N70 mm Hg.

5. Clinical trials and experimental studies

What we know about ICH from the current status ofpreclinical and clinical trials is that blood pressure is elevatedin majority of patients with ICH. Elevated blood pressure isassociated with hematoma expansion and poor neurologicaloutcome, and there is no perihematoma ischemic region.Thus, based on the above evidence, it is reasonable to treatelevated blood pressure in patients presenting acutely in theemergency department. The adequate blood pressure para-meters, in order to sustain an adequate CPP as well toimprove the clinical outcome, are unknown. There have beenseveral small clinical trials and there is one ongoing largemulticenter clinical trial to answer this question.

In 1962, Meyer and Bauer [33] first demonstratedimprovement in mortality with the use of antihypertensivemedication in patients with ICH in their prospective, non-randomized trial. The data was limited because of the factthat the treated group had less severe symptoms thanuntreated group. Dandapani et al. [12] in 1995, retro-spectively studied blood pressure control within first 2 to 6 hafter presentation. Improved mortality and morbidity wereobserved with blood pressure reduction. However, the studydid not consider variables such as ICH volume, ventricularblood, and initial Glasgow coma scale (GCS) that confound

the results. Qureshi et al. [34] in 1999, in an animal studyshowed that the pharmacologic reduction of MAP had noadverse effects on ICP and rCBF in regions around anddistant to the hematoma. The study was limited by the factthat all the experimental animals were normotensive, asoppose to the majority of the patients who have longstandinghypertension which changes the cerebral flow dynamics.Powers et al. [35] in 2001, studied 14 patients within 6 to22 h with small- to medium-sized acute ICH. The CBF weremeasured before and after treatment with PET scan. Therewas no change in CBF either globally or in the perihematomaregion with a 15% reduction in MAP. The patients wererandomized to receive either nicardipine or labetalol.

In 2004, in a prospective multicenter study [36], safetyand feasibility of early antihypertensive treatment in 27patients showed low rates of neurological deterioration andhematoma expansion. Patients who were treated within 6 hwere more likely to be independent at one month thanpatients who were treated between 6 and 24 h. There weresome limitations to the study, including unmatched controlwith variable characteristics, and that not every patientunderwent 24-h follow-up computed tomography (CT).Therefore, asymptomatic hematoma expansion could havebeen missed. In a single-center, prospective registry in2006 [37], 29 patients were treated with nicardipine toachieve MAP goal b130 mm Hg within first 24 h, asrecommended by AHA guidelines. The study was uniquein several aspects. First, the AHA guidelines were used asa guiding principle for the management of the bloodpressure for the first time. Second, nicardipine was selected

Graph 1. Systolic blood pressure control with intravenous labetalol and hydralazine. Reprinted with permission from SAGE. Qureshi et al. [36].

77Q.A. Shah et al. / Journal of the Neurological Sciences 261 (2007) 74–79

in order to maintain an even and effective reduction in theblood pressure, instead of previous protocols with acombination of boluses of labetalol and hydralazine,(Graphs 1 and 2). The study demonstrated that 86% ofpatients tolerated nicardipine, neurological deteriorationwas observed in 13% of patients and that hematomaexpansion was seen in 18% of patients.

6. New clinical trials

Antihypertensive treatment of acute cerebral hemorrhage(ATACH) trial [38] is designed to determine the tolerabilityof the treatment as assessed by achieving and maintainingthree different SBP goals with intravenous nicardipineinfusion for 18 to 24 h post-ictus in subjects with ICHwho present within 6 h of symptom onset. The neurologicaldeterioration during the treatment and any serious adverseevents will also be monitored. The patients are being

Graph 2. Mean arterial pressure control with intravenous nicardipine. Printed w

recruited if they have initial SBP greater than 200 mm Hg.The study is divided into three tiers; in the first tier the SBPbeing kept between 170 and 200 mm Hg, in the second tierbetween 140 and 170 mm Hg, and in the third tier between110 and 140 mm Hg. The current study will be able to helpincrease our understanding of the principles of bloodpressure control in acute ICH. Currently, we use AHAguidelines to maintain MAP between 90 and 130 mm Hg atour institution with intravenous nicardipine infusion usingthe above mentioned protocol (see Table 1).

7. Initiation of oral antihypertensive medications

A high proportion of the ICH patients have chronichypertension. After 24 h, blood pressure should bemaintained at intermediate levels (below 160/100) and oralantihypertensive medications can be initiated. In clinicaltrials, antihypertensive medication has shown to reduce the

ith permission from Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Qureshi et al. [37].

Table 1Nicardipine infusion

MAP: mean arterial pressure.aTarget MAP: 90 mm Hg–130 mm Hg.

78 Q.A. Shah et al. / Journal of the Neurological Sciences 261 (2007) 74–79

mean incidence of stroke by 35–40%, myocardial infarctionby 20% to 25%; and more than 50% in heart failure [39].“The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee onPrevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of HighBlood Pressure, provides a new guideline for hypertensionprevention and management. The following are the keymessages: (a) In persons older than 50 years, SBP of morethan 140 mm Hg is a much more important cardiovasculardisease (CVD) risk factor than diastolic BP. (b) The risk ofCVD, beginning at 115/75 mm Hg, doubles with eachincrement of 20/10 mm Hg; individuals who are normoten-sive at 55 years of age have a 90% lifetime risk fordeveloping hypertension. (c) Individuals with a SBP of 120to 139 mm Hg or a diastolic BP of 80 to 89 mm Hg shouldbe considered as prehypertensive and require health-

promoting lifestyle modifications to prevent CVD. (d)Thiazide-type diuretics should be used in drug treatmentfor most patients with uncomplicated hypertension, eitheralone or combined with drugs from other classes. Certainhigh-risk conditions are compelling indicators for the initialuse of other antihypertensive drug classes (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor block-ers, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers). (e) Most patientswith hypertension will require 2 or more antihypertensivemedications to achieve goal BP (b140/90 mm Hg, or b130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes or chronic kidneydisease). (f) If BP is more than 20/10 mm Hg above the goalBP, consideration should be given to initiating therapy with2 agents, 1 of which usually should be a thiazide-typediuretic” [40].

79Q.A. Shah et al. / Journal of the Neurological Sciences 261 (2007) 74–79

References

[1] Dennis MS, Burn JP, Sandercock PA, Bamford JM, Wade DT, WarlowCP. Long-term survival after first-ever stroke: the OxfordshireCommunity Stroke Project. Stroke 1993;24(6):796–800.

[2] Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB. The Stroke DataBank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke 1988;19(5):547–54.

[3] Giroud M, Gras P, Chadan N, Beuriat P, Milan C, Arveux P, et al.Cerebral haemorrhage in a French prospective population study.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54(7):595–8.

[4] Qureshi AI, Tuhrim S, Broderick JP, Batjer HH, Hondo H, Hanley DF.Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2001;344(19):1450–60.

[5] Juvela S. Risk factors for impaired outcome after spontaneousintracerebral hemorrhage. Arch Neurol 1995;52(12):1193–200.

[6] Lisk DR, Pasteur MD, Rhoades H, Putnam RD, Grotta JC. Earlypresentation of hemispheric intracerebral hemorrhage: prediction ofoutcome and guidelines for treatment allocation. Neurology 1994;44(1):133–9.

[7] Wallace JD, Levy LL. Blood pressure after stroke. JAMA 1981;246(19):2177–80.

[8] Britton M, Carlsson A, de Faire U. Blood pressure course in patientswith acute stroke and matched controls. Stroke 1986;17(5):861–4.

[9] Aslanyan S, Fazekas F, Weir CJ, Horner S, Lees KR. Effect of bloodpressure during the acute period of ischemic stroke on stroke outcome:a tertiary analysis of the GAIN International Trial. Stroke 2003;34(10):2420–5.

[10] Willmot M, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PM. High blood pressure in acutestroke and subsequent outcome: a systematic review. Hypertension2004;43(1):18–24.

[11] Qureshi AI, Ezzedine MA, Nasar Abu M, Suri FK, Kirmani JF,Hussein H. Acute hypertension in 563,704 adult patients presenting tothe emergency room with stroke in the United States. Am J Emerg Med2007;25(1):32–8 (Jan).

[12] Dandapani BK, Suzuki S, Kelley RS, Reyes-Iglesias Y, Duncan RC.Relation between blood pressure and outcome in intracerebralhemorrhage. Stroke 1995;26(1):21–4.

[13] Arboix A, Roig H, Rossich R, Martinez EM, Garcia-Eroles L.Differences between hypertensive and non-hypertensive ischemicstroke. Eur J Neurol 2004;11(10):687–92.

[14] Qureshi AI, Geocadin RG, Suarez JI, Ulatowski JA. Long-termoutcome after medical reversal of transtentorial herniation in patientswith supratentorial mass lesions. Crit Care Med 2000;28(5):1556–64.

[15] Cheung RT, Hachinski V. Cardiac effects of stroke. Curr Treat OptionsCardiovasc Med 2004;6(3):199–207.

[16] Nakagawa K, Yamaguchia T, Seidaa M, Yamadab S, Imaea S, TanakacY, et al. Plasma concentrations of brain natriuretic peptide in patientswith acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;19(3): 157–64.

[17] Nath FP, Kelly PT, Jenkins A, Mendelow AD, Graham DI, TeasdaleGM. Effects of experimental intracerebral hemorrhage on blood flow,capillary permeability, and histochemistry. J Neurosurg 1987;66(4):555–62.

[18] Bullock R, Brock-Utne J, van Dellen J, Blake G. Intracerebralhemorrhage in a primate model: effect on regional cerebral blood flow.Surg Neurol 1988;29(2):101–7.

[19] Mendelow AD, Bullock R, Teasdale GM, Graham DI, McCulloch J.Intracranial haemorrhage induced at arterial pressure in the rat: Part 2.Short term changes in local cerebral blood flow measured byautoradiography. Neurol Res 1984;6(4):189–93.

[20] Qureshi AI, Wilson DA, Hanley DF, Traystman RJ. No evidence for anischemic penumbra in massive experimental intracerebral hemorrhage.Neurology 1999;52(2): 266–72.

[21] Hirano T, Read SJ, Abbott DF, Sachinidis JI, Tochon-Danguy HJ, EganGF, et al. No evidence of hypoxic tissue on 18F-fluoromisonidazolePET after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 1999;53(9): 2179–82.

[22] Carhuapoma JR, Wang PY, Beauchamp NJ, Keyl PM, Hanley DF,Barker PB. Diffusion-weighted MRI and proton MR spectroscopicimaging in the study of secondary neuronal injury after intracerebralhemorrhage. Stroke 2000;31(3):726–32.

[23] Zazulia AR, Diringer MN, Videen TO, Adams RE, Yundt K, AiyagariV, et al. Hypoperfusion without ischemia surrounding acute intracer-ebral hemorrhage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21(7): 804–10.

[24] Yang GY, Betz AL, Chenevert TL, Brunberg JA, Hoff JT. Experi-mental intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship between brain edema,blood flow, and blood–brain barrier permeability in rats. J Neurosurg1994;81(1):93–102.

[25] Nath FP, Jenkins A, Mendelow AD, Graham DI, Teasdale GM. Earlyhemodynamic changes in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. JNeurosurg 1986;65(5):697–703.

[26] Qureshi AI, Hanel RA, Kirmani JF, Yahia AM, Hopkins LN. Cerebralblood flow changes associated with intracerebral hemorrhage.Neurosurg Clin N Am 2002;13(3):355–70.

[27] Chen ST, Chen SD, Hsu CY, Hogan EL. Progression of hypertensiveintracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 1989;39(11):1509–14.

[28] Kazui S, Naritomi H, Yamamoto H, Sawada T, Yamaguchi T.Enlargement of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Incidence andtime course. Stroke 1996;27(10):1783–7.

[29] Kelley RE, Berger JR, Scheinberg P, Stokes N. Active bleeding inhypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: computed tomography. Neu-rology 1982;32(8):852–6.

[30] Kazui S, Minematsu K, Yamamoto H, Sawada T, Yamaguchi T.Predisposing factors to enlargement of spontaneous intracerebralhematoma. Stroke 1997;28(12):2370–5.

[31] Mayer SA, Brun NC, Begtrup K, Broderick J, Davis S, Diringer MN,et al. Recombinant activated factor VII for acute intracerebralhemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2005;352(8):777–85.

[32] Broderick JP, Adams Jr HP, Barsan W, Feinberg W, Feldmann E,Grotta J, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneousintracerebral hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionalsfrom a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American HeartAssociation. Stroke 1999;30(4):905–15.

[33] Meyer JS, Bauer RB. Medical treatment of spontaneous intracranialhemorrhage by the use of hypotensive drugs. Neurology 1962;12:36–47.

[34] Qureshi AI, Wilson DA, Hanley DF, Traystman RJ. Pharmacologicreduction of mean arterial pressure does not adversely affect regionalcerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure in experimentalintracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 1999;27(5):965–71.

[35] Powers WJ, Zazulia AR, Videen TO, Adams RE, Yundt KD, AiyagariV, et al. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow surrounding acute (6 to22 hours) intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2001; 57(1):18–24.

[36] Qureshi AI, Mohammad YM, Yahia AM, Suarez JI, Siddiqui AM,Kirmani JF, et al. A prospective multicenter study to evaluate thefeasibility and safety of aggressive antihypertensive treatment inpatients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Intensive Care Med2005;20(1):34–42.

[37] Qureshi AI, Harris-Lane P, Kirmani JF, Ahmed S, JacobM, Zada Y, et al.Treatment of acute hypertension in patients with intracerebral hemor-rhage using American Heart Association guidelines. Crit Care Med2006;34(7):975–80.

[38] Qureshi AI. Antihypertensive treatment of acute cerebral hemorrhage(ATACH): rationale and design. Neurocrit Care 2007;6(1):56–66.

[39] Neal B, MacMahon S, Chapman N. Effects of ACE inhibitors, calciumantagonists, and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results ofprospectively designed overviews of randomised trials, Blood PressureLowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Lancet 2000;356(9246):1955–64.

[40] Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, CushmanWC, Green LA, Izzo JrJL, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee onPrevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High BloodPressure: the JNC 7 Report. JAMA 2003;289(19):2560–72.