activity reporting lead partner and partner seminar 16 june 2009 – laukaa, finland kirsti...

30
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Upload: beverly-rodgers

Post on 26-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Activity Reporting

Lead Partner and Partner Seminar16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland

Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Page 2: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Project Partner

1. Statement of Expenditure

+ Partner Activity Report

3. Certificate of Expenditure + FLC checklist

+ Transaction List+ Partner Activity

Report

12. Share of Grant

First Level Controller

2. First level control

Certificate of Expenditure +FLC checklist

Lead Partner

4. Progress Report: Project Claim + Certificates of Expenditure +

FLC checklists + Activity Report +

Promotional materials

10. Receipt of Grant

11. Distribution of Grant

Programme Secretariat

5. Assessment Activity Report

Managing Authority

6. Compilation check Progress

Report

7. Decision of Payment

Certifying Authority

8. Final payment check

9. Payment + notification

Activity Report in the Progress Report lifecycle

Page 3: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Project Partner

1. Statement of Expenditure

+ Partner Activity Report

3. Certificate of Expenditure + FLC checklist

+ Transaction List+ Partner Activity

Report

12. Share of Grant

First Level Controller

2. First level control

Certificate of Expenditure +FLC checklist

Lead Partner

4. Progress Report: Project Claim + Certificates of Expenditure +

FLC checklists + Activity Report +

Promotional materials

10. Receipt of Grant

11. Distribution of Grant

Programme Secretariat

5. Assessment Activity Report

Managing Authority

6. Compilation check Progress

Report

7. Decision of Payment

Certifying Authority

8. Final payment check

9. Payment + notification

Activity Report in the Progress Report lifecycle

Page 4: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Why to report?

Monitoring of project by

- PMC- MA- Secretariat

Guarantee satisfactory project implementation

Continous measurement and quantifiaction of project outputs

Cross-check project application/ decision vs implementation

Information and knowledge to broader public

Page 5: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Activity Report Template

Available on www.northernperiphery.eu

10 Sections: General information Project Activities and Performance Project Indicators Project Financial Information Analysis of Project Activity and

Outcomes Performance Project Management and

Partnership Dynamics NPP Horizontal Principles Project Communication Other changes (partnership, target

area, other) Additional information

Page 6: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 1: General Information

Report number and period Project title Acronym and Duration Priority

Page 7: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 1: General Information

Target area/ location of operation Partnership information

Based on the information from the application

Note: Changes need prior approval by the Secretariat Lead partner’s written request

to Secretariat by mail

Page 8: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 1: General Information

Executive summary Overall description of project

implementation process Status of development of

products and services (outcomes so far, compared with objectives set out in application)

Will be used for wider dissemination

Page 9: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance

Project activities Overall description of activities so

far Highlights of most important

activities for project implementation progress

Links between Work Packages

Page 10: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance

Information taken from the application

Description of each project work package

Activities as planned in the activity plan in the approved application

Results to date

Page 11: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance

Change of activities in comparison to approved application Any activity changes need pre-

approval by Secretariat Justification of the change and

impact on implementation of project

1 request for change per year

Page 12: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 3: Indicators

General indicators based on indicators outlined in application and decision

Page 13: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 3: Indicators

Priority 1 or 2 specific indicators Activity Output Result

Page 14: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 3: Indicators

Additional project indicators as in the approved application

Change of indicators in comparison to approved application Any indicator changes need pre-

approval by Secretariat Justification of the change and

impact on implementation of project

1 request for change per year

Page 15: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 3: Indicators

Project outcomes Overall description of project

implementation process Status of development of products

and services (outcomes so far, compared with objectives set out in application)

Description of innovative features of developed products and services

Transnational impact Could the product/ service be

transferred to other countries? How does it make a difference across

the region? Organisational learning? Added value of the adopted

transnational approach?

Page 16: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 4: Project Financial Information

Project Expenditures Total approved project budget Total certified expenditures

Current reporting period Accumulative

Page 17: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 4: Project Financial Information

Analysis of the financial performance in comparison to approved total budget Underspendings/ Overspendings/

Unexpected expenditures % of budget spent vs. % of time

spent according to project plan Will the project keep spending

targets and still achieve outputs Good value for money

Could have been more achieved with the same inputs of money or could same outcomes have been achieved with reduced financial inputs? Efficient use of the budget

Cross referring to the financial report

Page 18: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 4: Project Financial Information

Budget changes Justification for the change Description of impact of changes

for the project implementation 1 request for change per year

Page 19: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 5: Analysis of Project Activity and Outcomes Performance

Project activity and outcome performance Analysis of project activity and

outcome performance in relation to: Indicators Time plan Budget

Page 20: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 6: Project Management and Partnership Dynamics

Analysis of Project Management dynamics Arrangements that were used to

implement the project, involved partners List of issues discussed List of decisions taken Description of impact of decision on

project implementation

Dynamics in the project partnership Advantages of the transnational

partnership approach Challenges of international cooperation in

transnational setting

Project cooperation/ Synergies with other projects Concrete cooperation activities

Page 21: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 7: NPP 2007-2013 Horizontal Principles

Equal Opportunities – concrete steps and activities Gender: provision of day care for

children during partner meetings Age: Special tailored staff

recruitment plan for young employees

Social: Special employment plan for indigenous people

How did this change the working culture in the organisations participating in the project?

Page 22: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 7: NPP 2007-2013 Horizontal Principles

Sustainable Development – concrete steps and activities Implementation of Sustainable

impact assessment tool for resource use

Minimized travel plan for meetings – ICT solutions, use of environmental friendly transportation, voluntary carbon offset

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan

Transnational/ shared use of rescue equipment

How did this change the working culture in the organisations participating in the project?

Page 23: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 8: Project Communication

Communication indicators to measure progress on the

mandatory communication measures and expected attendance at NPP events

accumulative

List of all communication tools and promotional materials developed Purpose to exemplify indicators

given in question 8.1 Examples:

Brochure Website exhibition roll-up PowerPoint presentations Pens

Page 24: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 8: Project Communication

Provide an analysis of the internal and external communication activities Purpose to get a sense of general

performance on communication and best practices

What activities worked well, any innovative steps to enhance performance

Certification of compliance with the NPP and European publicity requirements Commission Regulation No

1828/2006, Articles 8 and 9. This is a matter of eligibility:

European Commission recommends a 2% flat rate cut

Page 25: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 9: Changes in Project Partnership, Target Area and Other Changes

Additional changes in comparison to the approved application/ to the decision

All changes require pre-approval by Secretariat: Partnership Target area Duration Work package structure

Page 26: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Section 10: Additional Information

Feedback and Suggestions To NPP bodies/ the programme Background for evaluation activities

in the programme

Overview on other documents requested Project claim Certificates of Expenditure Summary of Certificates of

Expenditure FLC checklists Examples of information/

dissemination material

Signature

Page 27: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Submitting an Activity Report

Please send the Activity report as part of the Progress Report together with other required documents to:

Northern Periphery Programme Secretariat

Att.: Responsible Desk Officer

Strandgade 91, 4.Sal

DK-1401 Copenhagen-K

Denmark

and per e-mail: [email protected]

Page 28: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Assessment of the Activity Report

The Programme Secretariat is the body that assesses the Activity Report Assessment includes:

Completeness of the information Eligibility of activities carried out Coherence of activities with objectives set out in the application and decision Concrete actions meeting the NPP horizontal principles Quality of partnership and distribution of roles between the partners Current degree of project progress achieved Efficiency and effectiveness of the project implementation process Measurement of quality and quantity of project outputs and results Impact, Added value and Sustainability Improvement proposed and anticipated results Analysis of project expenditure and other budgetary matters

Assessment of activity report will be sent to Managing Authority together with the claim

Page 29: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

No Report = No Money!!

Page 30: Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer

Thank you for listening!