action items isolation pilot... · 2016-09-15 · action items developed in the course of the...
TRANSCRIPT
ACTION ITEMS
DEVELOPED IN THE COURSE OF THE NOVEMBER 4, 1992
DOE/NMED/EEG/NM WIPP TASK FORCE QUARTERLY MEETING
NMBR ACTION FOR DESCRIPTION OF ACTION REQUIRED
1. NMED Provide EEG and DOE with a description of therelationship of DOE's Test Phase Plan to the permitapplication now being processed by NMED.
2. DOE Take, the lead in arranging for meetings between DOEand EEG to discuss the following:
a. Concerns about Xylene in waste expressed inrecent EEG letters and DOE's responses tothose letters.
b. The EEG-50 Report and DOE comments!concerns about that report.
3. DOE Provide the schedule/availability for the SAR and datafor Dry Bins, Humid Bins, Alcoves, and solubilitytesting to EEG.
4. DOE Provide EEG with a copy of the May 1992 draft of theComprehensive Underground Management Plan.
5. EEG Provide comments on WIPP's RCRA, Part B, p iapplication to NMED as soon as possible.
6. DOE Provide EEG with a copy of the "Waste Isolation iwPlan Supplementary Roof Support SystUnderground Storage Area Panel 1, room 1Geotechnical Field Data Analysis Bi-Annual Report" ofApril, 1992, that was mentioned during ToddBurrington's presentation.
7. DOE Provide EEG with a copy of the data submitted to theNRC, to support the application for certification of theTRUPACT 11 to transport additional waste forms.
8. DOE Evaluate a system to provide EEG with copies of allfinal--issue Sandia and DOE reports on the WIPP.
ACTION ITEMS (continued)
9. DOE Determine if EEG should participate in the nextPeriodic Performance Review of the SupplementaryRoof Support System in Room 1, Panel 1 by theSupplementary Roof Support system Advisory Group.
10. DOE Provide a set of view graphs used during the Nov. 4,199.2 DOEINMED/EEG/NM WIPP Task Force QuarterlyMeeting to each of the participating organizations(WPIO, WPSO, NMED, EEG, SNL, WID and the NMWIPP Task Force). (This has been accomplished.)
11. EEG Coordinate next DOEINMED/EEGINM WIPP TaskForce Quarterly Meeting to be held in mid-January,199-3.
2
I Agenda
I DOIE/NME-D/EEGNovember 4, 1992
8:00 Introduction and Opening Remarks - Neil Weber (No -. I I s)
18:15 WIPP RCRA Review Status Report -B.Mouzh<c S. CoL,'&s (ko.s e
1 8:30 Opening Remarks - John Arthur 1, a"uk)
9:15 Opening Remarks - Bob Neill ~
10:00 Break
10:15 Stability Of Existing Test Rooms Of Panel 1 - Tod Burrington (A f11:00 Alcove Seal Design Status; - Ravi Batra (WPIO) -,
1 11:30 Underground Management Plan - Kent Hunter (WPSO)
112:30 Lunch
11:30 Status Report On Bin Preparation At INEL And Rocky Flats- Jim Coffey (WPIO)/Ron Guymon (WID) (P. . . ) w17
1 2:15 Status Report On The WIPP Performance Assessment Effort-Rip Anderson (Sandia)
3:00 Break
3:15 Plans For Source Term Experiments At LANLI - Bob Houck (WPIO)IRobert Villarreal (LANL)
I4:00 Summary Of Action Items Best Available Copy
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION GROUP
NCO A EQUAL. OPPORTUNMY /A~RWMATTVE ACTION EMPLOYER7007 WYOMING BOULEVARD, N.E.
SUITE F-2ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MIEXICO 87109
(505) 828-1003
XL QUARTERALY MEETING
U.S. Department of Energy
N.M. Environmental Evaluation Group
N.M. Environment Department IN
November 4, 1992 Best Available Copy
Providing an independent technical analysis of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP),a federal transuranic nuclear waste repository.
EXAMPLES OF _THE EGs ROLE INSATSFACTORILY RESOLVING THE
WIFIISSIJES
Site haraterization,
o Deep Dissolution - Organized workshops,proposed testing and resolved the issue in1987.
o Brine Reservoirs - After WIPP-12, urgedDOE to move the repository location.
o Karst in Rustler - EEG-32. Propos64-additional testing.
" Breccia Pipes - Organized workshops andadditional studies,
" Repository horizon - Accepted the existingrepository horizon after MIB139 fracturingwas discovered and SNL studied the alter-natives.
Best Available Copy
q Transportation
o Transportation Risk -Have providedindependent technical analyses (EEG-5,EEG-46) to put the issue in scientific
I perspective.
o TRUPACT - Documented the inadequaciesof TRUPACT-I (EEG-24, EEG-33), and
I accepted the adequacy of right circularTRUPACT-Il.
Monitoring
o Pre-operational En' vironmental Monitoring
o CAMs adequate for dry bin tests.
Best Available copy
I EXAMPLES OF MAJOR ISSUESREMAINING UNRESOLE )BECAUSE
DOE HAS NOT RESOLVED THEM
Test Phase - Plans; keep changing. Still nofinal plans.
I Retardation - Laboratory experiments plan-ned now could have been done 10 years ago.
I Solubility Experiments - Laboratory experi-ments planned now could have started 3 yearsago.
Alcove Tes - Changing DOE position. Workion Alcove seal could have been performed.4years ago.
Room Saity- Pa nel 1 rooms were exca-vated before specific,. plans to use them.
Best Available Cop,
-CAMs - DOE has not implemented about 50%of peer review panel's recommendations 1.5years ago.
Flammabiit - DOE has not reconciled thedifferent requirements between a "safe" testand a "useful" one.
Aalilt of Waste for Tets M Only 5 binsprepared after 2 years effort.
Oeratoa Saet urin Test Phase - Untilthe plans and safety analyses are completed,the issue remains.
Safety Analy-sis Rprt-Excluding dry bin,tests, no reports or schedules for compleion.<-
Best Available C
TLC.) :a
cn L 0 ~' 4-0LOC
o0
4- %I--aU)~ 2 :3Qa -c) Q) U) C0 0 ( 0C 00
Cl) 0)LO(30cd a) -
E LE C)
U)
.0-0
00 0 co0ICE' 0 c J
a)!e~ fl--H LO e01e)iviabeCp
STATLJSDF TEST PLANA EXPERIMENTS
6/22/92 DOE announces WIPP Tests arefor purposes other than40 CFR 191.
11/5/92 Test Plan not available
*No identification of experimentsyet
*What data are to be obtained.(Pb, VOCs?)
" Alcove Drum Test
o Humid and inundated tests
o Dry Bin Test
Best Avail able Copy
I STATUS OF TEST PHASEEXPERIMIENTS
IDate ofSAR Data Available
Dry Bins Done?
Humid Bins ------ ---
A lc o v e -- --- -
Solubility* -- 1/97
I Best Available Co,
BIN LOADN SCHEDULE
o Expected in 9/91 Plan 48
o Actual Total 5
o Expected Availability ofRFP FacilityI
o Expected Availability ofINEL Facility
Best Available Copy
Cl)LUJ
x 0
ILULL0I Lw
OIonm g2 I
00
_0
* Best Available Copy
z i A q q hidr.. 9 qn ,- - - - - - - - - --
ri~~r- [i pn rrr' ri
1L!JLiLiLJLJLL..J..... Wj .JJ LKIJKIHHL
11s 1 LasS -. -j -f~ -n -- - - - ---ofr r , ~ r -i -. f.-- r1 ri ri ri r
II iI It Ilo
I I wL1: IJL LI L I U LI ftIJ 1I 1L LJ t
n, r' ,i 1r. 11If 11 1 . I ILi 1 1 111 U J LJ
r -1 rin r-s, r -w r
1 1 1 1
i ~ Best Available Copy
31FE
z 0
o CL0D 0
z cc0Cu 0
o CD
>_ ELL4- +'54"
Q/) Cl) Liz 0
La.
< 0CL~ <Cfl0 U
0 00..0 00
-00 CLc t 0C
0 a) (
0 0O
0 0 0 0
*0 1
AA
x x
x x
AX X X A OXN X X
1NS'AILAfO X0 1 N W ETTXN
A &X
P RSU~.INSTALLATIONXX
-xPLANNEDEXTENS M-M x
BestLAIO Avibl CopX RAIA COM EC
*tO r
PANEL 1 ROOMS 1 THROUGH 7CON9VERGENCE RATES
3.5
3.07
3 2.8 2.742.68
2.43.512.49 2.5
2.19
2
0.
ROOM I ROOM 2 ROOM 3 ROOM 4 ROOM 5 ROOM 6 ROOM 7LOCATION
ENJANUARY - JUNE 1992 &JUNE - DEC 1991
Best Available cmp
I PANEL 1 CONVERGENCE RATES
LOCATION -CONVERGENCE RATE (IN/YR)JAN-JUNE 1992 JUNE-DEC. 1991
ROOM 13.07
ROOM 2 2.34 2.74
ROOM 3 2.43 2.51
ROOM 4 22..35 2.40
ROOM 5 2. 10 2.19
ROOM 6 2.49 2.50
ROOM 7 2.39 2.68
S1600 RM 1 2.03 2.42
S1600 RM 4 2.28 2.77 j~S1600 RM 7 1.77 3.580
S 1950 RM 1 2.14 2.57
S1950 RM 4 2.27 2.61
S1950 RM 7 1.64 1.78
Best Available Copy
0z
CN
CNI
cmc-JY
Iles? Available iCopy~ LLS S~ 9 SOS ~ L~ 9S 9SOS ~Jd9 S '~ -L7-nLt fl7ni . .aatdm-im in vmi n ~ .
0((
Z~ 0
uJ1 10 0-U CL5(D
C-)+- . 0 0
0 >- . 0CC
o U _DCr0
C o C
0< q~0
U) E EE E- U 0. 0 0m 00
0 0 0 0 cc 0 a
ZI +*o ~s valbeCp
0.9
0 0
E CI
ED E) 0 aLU m E c
a, C 4-J
0 ca.z. z 00L~~0 0 CO ~
_~ 4-
C
00 Cc)ai
a, 0) CLU cn .ca,'
c00CIC
0 0 0.0 0( 0 :0 m~ 0> +- : 0) 0 0" -
CD C
LUH ~ ~ "( E c L 0 aE cu a) .4-'0L.U 0 CIO*.*
S-% C 0 0)) < C m+0 - a)
LU cuo
0 0 : n4J4-Jro 0 0 q >" 0 CI
* I. 0 0est Available Copy
PANEL 1, ROOM ICONVERGENCE RATES
LOCATION ~CONVERGENCE RATE (IN/YR)____________ AN-JUNE 1992 JUNE-DEC 1991
S1884 2.12 25
S1853 2.48 2.94
1S1841 '2.67 2.98S1802 2.85 3.07
S1758 2.93.57
S1717 12.885 3.39
S1681 2.39 2.86
S 1639 1.84 2.06
Best Availlabl. Copy
PAE1 RO
PANEL 1- ROOM6
2.3
2 .1 -2 .0 6
z
i1j~
S 1884 51853 S 184.1 S 1802 S 1758 S1717 S 1681 S 1639LOCATION
JANUARY - JUNE 1992 22JUNE - DEC 1991
ees Avll~0 opy
PANEL 1 ACCESS DRIFTS4 ~CON1VERGENCE RATE
3.58
32177 2.7 .6
2.3 2.42 2.57Z 1 2.6
2 1.7 1.64 1.78
S1600 RMI S1600RM4 S1600 RM7 S1950 RMI S19So RM4 S 1950 RM7LOCAniON
JANUAR~Y - JUNE 19'92 JUNE -DEC 1991
B3est Available C
39!LL69 Ste 9099L999O
z 0
0U) CV)
w0 SIMO
cc;0
0
Mid 06
wI * 0 Ccco 00I-0
ooill t 0.be. ~ 6
I.LI .5~ uI Low
00
Best Available p
cr.)
0) 0M
'-M Cu m0MT Lm
L JCID 4A ) .
0L 00
.0C 0)0WE. 0 m 0 m 7E
u Cu : 0. CD C 0 .
oo OTh< Q:a 0 C4 Ej :
Cc 0 a. L.
MC (,1 0ý CuCcNC)c u E0 >C EC u0; u
0 0)4)~ E I- 4-0)
0 0 0 0a%est Avia)eCp
0 L
0. LLU 0I.0 01 w
LL0-0
mJ N w a N~ =
z z z CL UOLU 0&LU M 0LU LU LM.. 0WIIle
LUz CL .....
LUJ 0..z. .... .... ..........m.m..
LL UO... .................
.......... ... ........ ...........0.....
......I ... . . .... ..... .....
~~LU
I0
0I
0 0 _
.6 o -A 00
I0 0 OTe-
0 -W cm~
CC. > 0~'~ej
~0 ¶0 E w c 00co Oo
DOW.<U 0 "-' O0 00
Cf) 0) CLm~ 0m 0
CD 0000
oM EL 4) (
> CL 4)ow
E 0a
R~est AVEibecd
00
0 U'
C, 0 0 4.90(0 L 0 I'4.a m - 4.9 ftwoO
00LU 5 0 w -_)
0. .0 be IM0 owCc0 MEM M 1E0oo c0(CEcc
< 2 aw I 0 (Eu 0 amC
m 4C0) .0 <E
£0u w 00
wimm
(A orL m. CD. j. . C sum 0 0'
LIM U I
* E
FetAvaljlabl, o
COPY
II .. Z( L .
-- ?. IUI
LU a: LU il >.U) 0 LUJ
z 0 U 0
oU 4-----
am I'
V)
CAZ QL ...
U)
~QinN
LU I
...... ... LU ......
.... ....
U U ~t AailableCopy...
0 0
0 - (. L
Lu."
0 0 00 I 0
00C* 0 4)L.
C. L.L. 0 C
QOME 0 75._C 0uC 0m MUM
CDu
00 Cc*. 0
Cl) LM*mm4wnow3: m 0~ C)0zo BCu NONI
ow MINIA0
Resovalbl Cp0_______________ ___B owI
00
zc .2 cc0 wU 0
0 L. 4 L
0=o0 Ow= 0
0c 0CE -0. 0 000 0%6 0
00 c00 00> E~
.0. Lm 0yu0 0 IE
0 A0
LLIj~ CDUCE0 O E
.g I
*0 CD. 0o
0 0 m.C
7) 00 02± ~0cc> UT 00 c0
ur 02C>. 0 0
tmes AvaloablewCCD
> __ 0I
Uno 0 00
0 0LU 4) 00
C, 00)~ c~ 0Z 02 0 mao =4 -I a) cc-
X 4) = "6. 0 : LinA
.0 ~0)o 00 6.6. 0~ MIT0 IL E
0m 2 .>%.2
X ml 0( 0 tl)- 0(0 .zLVi-S0 m
00 4"Lam..6. 0 ow' Urn
0a 06(D W0.W 0C0 6
Z 0".-W1 -- a0 00C m) 06 6 0
= 0
Best Available Cos
0 c
0 1" 00 0 o
oo 0c
0, > offi0
0> >~ 4)>
o 2 0 .0 w.w ) .2 a C
w00# > IEN JCl 0
0.20
000
Z < 20
*0 0wU
B~est A vai/abl C'e
0 c.J
Z OcoCcu> 0
0
El 7 0.L M0 0 Cu
0
%low 0* * ~ L.. (JP)
E %ME a. 4D
Lm 0~ cc<0
00
ILCD ~ CLO 00 0
0i- ow "a %-
Wo 00 Cu r
00 0 ~ .2 C0 ~ 4 CD~ 0u*mu
0 O~'C .) .C. 0 a 0~0O
( 0 0 C L C
0
8&tAvailable copY I
C4U .
(M
04z. E00
o "m 0 0-0)
o 10C,) Lm.zi-a I"
M CUOU
W Z CLb 0
w .2Z) 0.
2:i. 10 005mC.)L00
Best A vc-iiab/Lo COPY
o 0to04
A.0
I-m
- CFo
'I- 06 0f =1
0 M M
Saw a..wo i
0 0 Co Ew -...
0 0
L- mr .2 w* w 0 0 0a m
ow~S Av%1i.able CIpI_______Sum__wa
.
-od
C'.J
0 00
>- O)
00
Mm
uj 0)
IL 4 0 0)0 >.
0~ 0~00L
E) 0omL a.rUa
Co 0 0LM L 0(0 L
0O
ý? Cvr:3~ Coo
04
U-oL
U))
0 U-EE
U)0 0(AU U) (A
z *o U)* 0
0.000
z 0N '-%- c
Z0 0. im
E Ll0 oOm no
CI 0. MC- 0 0 *w IU 0.-0 U
0 00 m0 * z :j.. "0Ec - c E00.137)0 3o4.o 00 . ECO
'0 IM 00 *' CL0(. o'-' L- Cc
* 0 S 0
Best Avai~be Cp
4
a.)
IP040)
Lu 0L.
- ~ 0
.0
Ow) . Lu0) ) ~ M 0LOr >0 00
mJUr0 Lo m -0 0LL L .00 0 a0L
LmE E E
L-~ )0 W.U
z ~~ M . .0 .Emil 0* o
Im moo* 0(~* diI .0 cc
13(Ut 0lalal Copy.
HZ< S IE
cn - - - - - - -
a Ire &
U I
z P-4t)
-EE
OkUO IL 40dmu
Z cf)S IA~ 1~ U - Im a ~m1 4 I"~ - ,
BetAalal o
> a)
a) 'U ) V U
a) CD 0 4 E 4)~, CD E Eam -. U) E
-- 3. m )~6
E c 0
a) 0 - "0 -e .- 010- 0 w~0
CD goE Im U0 CU
4) Z) * >)* 0 00 E 0 E 0
- .0 E- ->
*0 ~ 43m 7*~ EE > -C
2 2 . >) c E
m OO00.
w C CCCL C
~ .. 2 2.2 E~ o~ 2-- 0 .E >~
61 CD 43 4) V) .0cn 0 Lo
a' "B) m clurn ur 0 E- IV ' m>6 (m D Cib -Za) >1 0 46 >U) 0
m SO C.2 t 0 m C
a 0Wia (D > 0C t
I0 0 M CG)C u I I.w C M
u CD 6 I
- 0- - - --. 0 --> m oC 0 CL
CC6>
0..
II I
U) )
> M- f to 0-E DE w aV to ±0E = c ) 0. m* n
eu E 4Q0±
-to In..- C C . ~ .- mC te -to o
E Eo *C = 0* m E >c Iol' C
CD 0
CCD
* m:m cc ~tto tt to m
) 0 >CCC~ >UCC C CC C C
L) C m Qmm m am0))6 L/ =)6 6)6 c.aCCCx Sm U))CCC C
L) 9) CL 0 p a))
=~~ ~ ~ toI nc SV naVIS o "U 0 m m m m m m comcc t
.00 0
0 0
0 . 0: C mCm Z0
- mn) .=5O; 4ermaom~CL -CL) 4w- mC
uC
w m 0 LO m 0
E E C EZ0
EV- 6
E 6.. -M 0M 6
c 4)> etAalbeC
II
e-E
ouu
S4-Dcx ~ C
0b
0 E)
.;> E
0(
.2 . fro 0~~o
...'E >_
0 C
* 0 C0>C .
CL
ccoo
0) c a L0 )
~~-_ (OOC
C) C) 6.
U) -r
E E E EC
-~ L -
r- r--- - - -
v~ v 00 v(
CI) u
o d
0~C' C-,l4r~
F- --
C;
_ -72 -2 ME~
00 C-
o - cz
F -F .)cu ~ ~F
-cz
B e s A- _a la -n
x_ _ _ m x X
I 1111 1D- OS Oft. as . *,4
al~' -i
- - - - V ca
1' dI~u
CI) - El 4El -0
4) C EC.
go w. -
EE
- - -- -- - -
EM /Aala l * C
LL << )Cd L) x
-D o:.CiQ ~ CD .
~CO C ) IeA cy ) cyJ~) co
CD,
0V
z CD
co CD
.4
E) D E r- . c050
-a T 0 0
> 0
0>> 5 05
U)
c C.
0 aI0
0 a)
0 a) -t
Sc
0t a)
ztt0 N
UI Ct U14 u ct4-
I a)5 a)
ct M 4
CI; nS
CI) a) >~ _
C" a) ---da
0.. P- VS J0c
- *1~BeSt AwvII Cop3
-~ 0 0J0 =l 10 cu U.9coa - U) CD
C13 I: CUC
cc E co C5 cd (D C.)LU&E E E 05E 0 C c c
E C
cm 0 U'G C CU~ CD Ec
0 U 0 0 aC, lU)
0L -DC.0"
E ) 72 .9 x 0= m5c 0 oC)F
OC, -t- D e 0rCD E, a,0
>r a) 0 -U C a r C
0)J C*JLD 9
~4 C/)0 c'j
co = 0 C.) a)
E HO _u
, 0 \1 a Z
CU C
b0 L)
0CU0 0C.) C.)
~<00CH 0l 0 U)Ul0= _l _ _
0 r =om 00 000 50 cc 0 7E 7E
E) .5 -
) Cl/(1 7
0 0
E F:
RegAvalgho py
CC,,
4-) 4-10 U~a6)
w A
- U,*za.
ow-0Kirt
~~4s~ a)~. < 0
\C/)0~/ /c,,
- crN F4 -ce.
000~CO. - - .
I ý>H0 / UCZ
I / >0/ 0
@0/
oetAvailable p
__________________________________________
DRMVNG\CORING -NEW LEAK-TIGHT
H{YDRAULIC
HRA ROOF D(TENSION OF
ot WCC CONTAMINATIONI [NilCONTROL BOUNDARY
HOIST OPERATIONS
ARM
DRUM
POSmTONER
TRANSFERROOM___
ANL-W WCC CONCEPTUALSLUDGE SAMPLING 8etAalbeCp
cra)
cco
4-. W- aC:) a)
V) cn v-
C/4 cjt0t u** cjua M-' a)0o~- 4- a
Z~, cca)a)a0 zct c0
Best Availabi Copy
06
U)I T-) -J C
CO to co to o
-0~~ CO 0 %
~OcccHo N rcIN~ Vf'
C)(%1lC~j LO r, v V)~
~C0)
0j C.)IsQ
00
8.5Lf C3
ID
>jI)) E.cD
SZ 2E i cz ic
0-4~ 4 m o D D =
Ez .0C4 DCZI-- 4 ~ ~ E c )Loc)C=
zi0-4 E a) CUO T ' c - V04a D o C
C)M .404!
a)C ) C
z ~ I T.- ADC 0 CD
0z xCc 0 w -t
Bes cvo~ CDop
z - ql, ..a
0C c;
n 0000CDCZVHoC
E c n(Q C)0
z0 RT CD-C C 0C
Q0N QC 00 Q
~CCc
E 00~
CN .0 Im CN 10 C
0 CC .C)DU~ a- C
0~e~ Avilb CopyO *.C
EU cCD LO 11ýrcn 0E OCD co ( O:M2E4 CD CD A
RZcCIr C
EDUC ID,2E CDCDCDCZ 00000 C C
owLO co)N
N r ZC~ to ; ; C
cZO 2E c cCD0z,-D00 CCV Q0()CDC)C
Z N C)C ;Q;C
s0cCaj
cn c E O cJ'4 y- c nC
ECNcDLnN:
Bes AvCOlaoCopIn > C CD V) (
X -01', Lfi a; T.
c,'J
cW o 00 LOC I)Ij U- 0]' C~j C\j
CO 0W ct O 0 0-\ 0 0 o0C
0) o
LU 0)CY- CY)M 0 0 0) Lo 0)
0' 0) C 0 0C 0 0 0 0 0)
CI)Cz 0 0000cI)
ZHJ C CYJZL 0 0. c) 00
0-4W CC\J 0 C~J OD 00f 0 N~~
z 0) 0 000
0-. LLrF- c) qtCY) CO)a: - C C() 't 0 0)
z z C C C: 0 0
1HO 0 a:- 0~j 0Z 0 0 0. 0~
m ~ cf N- 00C) %;:40 nCC C c r LO 0 0
Zo 0l 0 0~ 0
00X .L LW
I- - z zZ<<
(: iLi± = WI
LU z- 005 ~ I 40 cj .-1 z O
:r- LL Lu - Lu a. z c
00c/) C\l .LUC\j N C~jI Lf) C~j
c o~' c o C ) 0 0)V) 0 0) 0 0 0z C C 0 0
CD r-mLOC1WCD rm -C~ :
0-I -0 CC) C t Cz=) LNJ0 CWCf) ZCj)
H~tf-~ 0 to C~CZ~ 2 ~ - o-I LOJ0-4 00M)0T-)q T
N0 0 )Z C C )
0U M LC)O
t o o 0cOD CD C') C
W C-j C 0 L Cj
z zII.
u0o
<WWIT~C\iC) 0 LO Y o.-u 8e) Avall eop
______________C)
cr)
0 0n00 0
ocD 000c
CD T
CI) 000C
cr)Z
0.4ol cyj
C)t C) C
cr) Z
cts Ma1) > 04 l
x ~ -- ; C= ;I
00u 0~
BetAvia o
Ecc'
U)
UO)0 c c LUc U I c~j c
CO c C C CC Lu I U
114 o4 fo a C C4 CCM'
UU U~ ro
FU LU _ 0
cc a.LI. CL( 0
LC 3o LCD 0 IA
C5 I. -i
*00am
Best Available Cop
........................................................41 crooda lor
........ DOCS&I PhaseAPPM&M
.............. ...........................
... ..
"W" SOW1411,10% pmbabwaolModole for AUOUWV CmAodl Test Data and
P01110"IMISACO PhOnOfflonalogicIl Modele
an"
Cw=n*PAMOdeft and OUS Cawilallonal Annual cyclennual cle
............ .................. ........
Y" ..........ed wweew .. . ................ .............. . ........
- F
............ ....
.............................% ..................... .. ........... ......................... ...... ........... .....no .................... ................ ...........
........................ ..................................................
saw" .................... M Z
............ ... #tp
.. ............ ............ .......... ... ...................... -, - --- t,.............................. .. ...................... .....Enginserod .........Action
Alternatives TestrequWad? .. ..........CArnma Evaluabom Guidance
to an .. ........... ..........
engineered -IV ....... ....Rome ..... ..... .WtwnaW e(s) . ... . .......
........ ............low
.. .........plan .. ........ .......
.... .... ...... .. ...... .. . .......... ...... .............TOU Guidance with Aa-A Wwbw
Waste and Baseline Design........ Apwwwww,
.. ......... ............... ......... .... .......-- V ...................................... .......... I.-.,.-.-.-.-.-.- -..- -
................. ........... ............Z---- -------- --- .......................................................... ........ .................
no
.. . .... ...
Yea ........................................... ..
. .... .......... ..... * ., ., ...... .. .. ................. . ................ ::: ............................ ...... ................ ...............
.... .. .... ..... .............
................... ..................... ..... .......................................
... .. .. .... .... .. .... .. ..... ........ ....... ........................................................... .................
Performance assessment. BeSt Available Col
IiI
j~cC0.
0). E0 L * W E ; .
~I I
.2 c a U
IL W J02
WI e
E *4) -j Vt a 0 C M
00 o e Q' E
CL) 1. .5~ f*
2 0.
al cc 0. c"i .2-cCL 0 2 0 of 02
Bes Avilbl Copy
Ic_ _ iCL
a a cN
CD am
04 a aw
CI a <
a a aV> > >
a c* **
CD 0
0040)
0.0
Cuu
0 00a
0 z 40
a.~ 0)0CS )
V 040 0 0)0) a (0-10 T- 04 4" m c ) . 0. V E
o- cco 0) 00'00 a) A-a_ ,0rL4m. cc 04 Cu C6
0 3c Z% SIE U) cc
co E) E 0 0 C
CCo0.~ >0 0 u~ 4.
Bes Avial Copy a
EI
CnEcc cr
0m 0 r.0 CE 0M M) 0
0 .. C CM -D
0 0 0 C0 ~~ ~ U)C LL
0~~ M)a
0r) cc . -CU~T U).~ . a
CL c 0o~~a 0)0 . )
E 0 a: - w 0in U)D -.5
0~~ Sn=-WC9- 4) 0. 0 4n= -% -
a) 040F 0 0. -0
a)q a.. 00a) n.. 2 0-
C.)a = C, C r 0 .. :4 C.0 Ca) ~-c.0 0 E
cn a) CL a- a)C 5:~E. 0. C s~i
0j 0 C c%P-) C C "0 w 0 CL lE L 0% C2 cc cc Er 2
0) .2) .2 .0 .2 211 CC00 0 0. 0c C4 0
E CL CD) cm* 0
BetAal0j o
C4- -w - -- ,- -
z. c-* CY
oR0- a
Hz p. L -
M - , -
.2 5
a. -
C, 41
zN U ~- -
a. .
I 0
to z
~ --- I---0 -
in --
uJ~~ I -
(flU 4Cca, - -- ----
- - --
w - -0 % - X - -0 a - - E
.0 CD CDlO
cc 2 a, ~.0 c
£6 50
C m e>b.a
t s- C0 6c
Best Avial Cop ýi .
10%, 50%, 90%, and Average CCDFs
for Discharge Plus Cuttings Dual
Porosity, with Retardations
Can tainmentRequirement
L...........1.. (1191.13(a))
10.1
A
i0-~ 1991L
Mean Whole Body Dose (1 mnremn)Less Than
Natural Background Levels10-' (about 100 mrom)
Risk Is Less Than I CR.PRecommended Limits
10-6 ia-5 10-4 10-3 11a-2 ia-1 100 101 102 103
Summed Norimalized Releases, R
BeSt Available cops
CC-
C1C(50) 0. cc 0)
0)~ 0 CgC
C 0-a. ~ C7 - -)
O)O) r0
U) &.) IL ) -=Cr 4 C1O 00. 0E 0Ua)I 0O cc0
E r ) W 0
CC cc 0 0 C~
.0~~ 0. cc0o .a-e
0 z ~ .. cc
cc 0.cc
z z
z z
N
~m. )I ~ Ecc
CC
00 0cC
13c~t Avilarble copy
0)0 4n-------------------
o0 U . 0 ' .
a 0-
cc 00 ) 0ECu CO r, WY,
0 -q
0 U. 0-
CM E0 zU.0) LL'
0) m5u <am
_0 cOuj C)COh.~ .. 0 U
0 _ ZE0 CD . LCOU.
_) Ma-) 'C13 U LL U
M 'r m 0CC7ccsto
U)If u~eA z ile
CO 1JISlUWIOUS
Be0 Avwa~ Co
I..
100 Cuttings 00Cuttings
W 10.1 10.1
A90t
* Percentile
10-3 0 10-3
10-6 10'5
106 10-3 100 103 104 10-3 100 103Release to Accessible Environment. R Release to Accessible Environment. R
Figure 1. Distributions of CCDFs and summary CCDFs from the 1991 WIPP preliminaryperformance assessment. Figures Ia and lb show total releases (subsurface andcuttings) assuming dual porosity transport with chemical retardation in theCulebra (Figures 2.1-2 and 4.1-1 in Helton et al., 1992). Figures ic and Idshow the same curves without subsurface releases (i.e., cuttings only) (Figure4-1.2 in Helton et al., 1992).
A-7
tAvaw.lb co.
I lo d lo%
IrwormS** *
0i- _o
C)C Ej cC)
0
LuMLSE M ... ..... .... ... ............. .... .....
.. .. .. ..
.. ... .
..... .........b ........... . .. .
~ "3e@~3 O A~IqeCA
Pes Avial CT
UU
) C
U ~ r cc' t;U~U
cu W.D m~~ E 0)
d) cc
-M) 0 c04
46.. Cu. 4) a~~0 0q q0 0
cc . . . Cc
E.1Ccu
0
Cc cc
o 0 i3
z
C~za. a)b S 0c.- f* c aCU
Best Available Copy
2 TABLE 6-1. SUMMARY OF VARIABLE IMPORTANCE IN THE 1991 WIPP PERFORMANCE3 ASSESSMENT. The summary presented In this table Is based on results obtained In the4 sensitivity analyses associated with the alternative conceptual models, with special5 emphasis being placed on results obtained in the best-estimate analysis (I.e., gas6 generation In the repository and a dual-porosity transport model In the Culebra Dolomite),7 and is conditional on these conceptual models, the numerical Implementation of thesea conceptual models in the WIPP performance assessment, the assessed subjective9 uncertainty in the 45 variables listed in Table 3-1 and the fixed values used for other10 variables required in the performance assessment.
121314 IMPORTANT1617 Borehole permeability (BHPERM)1sis Culebra fracture porosity (CULFRPOR)2021 Culebra fracture spacing (CULFRSP)2223 Drill bit diameter (DBDIAM)242s Fracture distribution coefficients (FKDAM, FKDNP, FDKPU, FDKTI-, FKDU, with plutonium, americium26 and uranium being the most Important elements)272s Matrix distribution coefficients for Individual elements (MKDAM, MKDNP, MKDPU, MKDTH, MKDU)293o Rate constant In Poisson model for drilling Intrusions (LAMBDA)3132 Salado permeability (SALPERM)3334 Solubilities for Individual elements (SOIAM, SOLNP4, SOLNP5, SOLPU4, SOLPU5, SOLTH. SOLU4,35 SOLU6)
383d SMALL EFFECTS OBSERVED
4042 Brine pocket pressure (BPPRES)4344 Brine pocket storativity (BPSTOR)454a Culebra dispersivity (CUILDISP)47 jT48 Culebra porosity (CULPOR)49so Culebra transmlssivity field (CULTRFLD)5152 Gas Generation rate for corrosion of steel under Inundated conditions (GROORI). The Indivdual variables53 related to gas generation (GRCORH, GRCIORI, GRMICH, GRMICA, STOICCOR, STOICMIC, VMETAL,54 VWOOD) had limited identifiable Impacts on analysis results. However, the presence or absence of55 gas generation had an Important effect on radionuclide release to the Culebra and on the effect that56 Salado permeability has on this release.57
6-15Best Available copy
2 TABLE 6-1. SUMMARY OF VARIABLE IMPORTANCE IN THE 1991 WIPP PERFORMANCE3 ASSESSMENT. The summary presented In this table Is based on results obtained In the4 sensitivty analyses associated with the alternative conceptual models, with special5 emphasis being placed on results obtained In the best-estimate analysis (i.e., gas6 generation in the repository anid a dual-porosity transport model In the Culebra Dolomite),7 and Is conditional on these conceptual models, the numerical Implementation of these
*a conceptual models In the WIPP performance assment, the assessed subjective9 uncertainty In the 45 variables listed In Table 3-1 and the fixed values used for other
10 variables required In the performance assessment (concluded)is1314 SMALL EFFE CTS OBSERVED (continued)1617 Index variable used to select relative areas of the stability regimes for different oxidation states ofis neptunium, plutonium and uranium (EHPH)192D fýarker Bed 139 permeability (MBPERM. 0.8 rank correlation with Salado permeability)2122 Recharge amplitude factor for Culebra (CULCLIM)2324 Salado pressure (SALPRES)
2728 LIMITED OIR NO EFFECTS OBSERVED
2031 Fraction of total waste volume that is occu pled by 1DB (integrated Data Base) metals and glass waste32 category (VMETAL)3334 Fraction of total waste volume that Is occuplied by IDB combustible waste category (VWOOD)3536 Fraction of waste panel area underlain by a pressurized brine pocket (BPAREAFR. effect overwhelmed by37 uncertainty In rate constant In Poisson model for drilling intrusions)3839 Gas generation rate due to microbial degradation of cellulosics; under humid conditions (GRM )4041 Gas generation rate due to microbial degradation of cellulosics under inundated conditions (M
43 Gas generation rate for corrosion of steel under humid conditions (GRCORH)4445 Initial fluid (brine) saturation of waste (BRSAT)4647 Marker Bed 139 porosity (MBPOR)4849 Stolchiometric coefficient for corrosion of steel (STOICCOR)50
5' StOlchiometric coefficient for microbial degradation of cellulosics (STOICMIC)5253 Threshold displacement pressure in Marker Bed 139 (MBTHPRES)
Rest Available Copy
I- wIr --- o,I0LIaLO
E- r
10
.lo. ....... .. .... .. -
-u r -..
LM .400
..
la .-0 ..... mcEi 3 j
...... ....
..... ........
IL
BeSt Avai!able Copy
:102 0
10-1 10-1 en,'
00
206-
10. 4 10-6
10-6 10-610104 '10- loo 103 10-6 102 loo10
Release to Cuiebma R Rdokr So Caleb's R
Duel PorositY. Gan*. No fRelal. I Times Sat D"ne Porosity,, Gas. mo aestg. I Tb.. 5a.100 l00
A A
*3 10-2 *3 10-', Udm9
.~10-3 10-
104 10-
-10-22 10-9 10- 10- 100 10' 10-12 109 10-4 10- 100 103Release to Accessaible Eswh~omm mm f. Rt Resaae to Accessible Enviounesat. R
Duol Pomisky Cass Owl~' Porosity. Gas
~1191.13(a)10-'0-1o Noan
AI
10-2 j10-3 /
10- 014
I210-6 I 04
10-6 -10-6
10- 10-3 l00 103 10-6 10-3 100 102Release to Accessible Environment. R Release to Accessible Envkonalmet R
Figure 4. CCDFs corresponding to the releases plotted in Figure 3 (Helton et al., 1992).
A-b 3~StAvailable Copyv
c;6
0 CE
-g V~3
* 0 a 0 0 -C-a 2. 3*
a S -6 U ESa=c a -E
z I I
Li: * U
0 a x VE
Fiur 3. Cuuatv nomlzdrlae o aincldstasotdi h uer
(1991 ~ ~ ~ 3'P prliinr pefomac aseset Hlone l,19)
A-9a
Bes Avial Cop
45.5
% n CL~ C CO0 GI
0.0 - -a =
0) U)-0 c 0).
0)0 & O
CA 01- 0 00) 0C.IC cc V C
c 0 CZ0-: C E- -90-Z w0
cc IE) ca~ (n o ) )
.2 -0 10 0
M . .0 .00CI.00
a- c c
00
C130) C
*000)0
0 0)z
Avial Cop0, I
CAAebu and Lhwwmfod 4Mwftemu d Ru&61w Fantone -cwsbra3 ~Shaft 3
shaft 2
NmO" ORZ
Whaft LShf
________ 4rb ORZAIdm - -ii ORZ 9- ~yr
WIN3 (a)
Culabra ad U~rvinud Mer~ra~ of RusiIet Fomuean Cuisbra and Lbvnd
Shaft
________________ ____________________ shaft S..I__________
M40138 Ttuuiuaim MIISSHalle Transiti Znr inn Na
AMVIftl A and 8S~DU6D Arfdirdme A aW IS
LOWafit Shaft EuwuI.
M813) k~wrDRZ Mte L4039I Transas FnZon.
3( b ) 1VA4242.5d7 I.2
schematic representation of rectangular repository/shaft 30 elfor analyzing undisturbed performance: (a) conceptual modelidentifying importance of panel/shaft seal properties, (b) econceptual model for identifying importance of anhydrite andfar-field Salado material properties. Case 'b" includes M3138,the northern experimental region, and a transition zone (TZ) butdoes not include individual waste blocks, panel seals, or the3 sump.
Case ua" assumes some degree of effective sealing throughout theg shaft, whereas Case "b" contains a single 10-in shaft seal.
i 8e~t~va~abICopy
CD
E0-
00L
I cuw_ 04
.2 0D C5 00" 2 a 3aYCC w
I. N1 .2 I- 0 CDCM.0 ca a?04 aDC 0 I y C c o q yaC
:- - r1cm CF)
0 0)CO. 00 D ~ (
8110A31-S 000iabl0 CopyVpsej~ u
00
I>
IE 2
0. 0
I) ()C
CcC
E cc
m 0Y
0 0 0JeAOOO e eej~ u= aIcoe6 >
CDI Y0w0VCC1
I ~~~~e go~A~;~ICpIoSRA00O ~u OLBGISE
01
al)
C) ',EllJ
CC0 u)cam-0C.)
a)Y
0C
0U-c
0.0
0 (Uy
Lu' Eor 0q
IH l uJ 4SOM 941Aq p onP~d U ) 14O0
0i
0ODJ
0.
0 _)
z - Cl
CDC C
Ga) a)L. >1Ec
z. E 0 C\4 -
n cj ., L a)a)a)- C: a)E
0) .- C C:
C/) <oCo -aco (i6 0-0 0U 00)0 C:. EEC
0 0 Gza) a) 0 Ca)a.) c -0.4 .3 C0 a)0z aoa0(
c 0~ aa)E) 0 0 L- -
0 .1 a a)-4-aa) o
o-V a) CZ) ' a)
a) E 0 0 E
1)1*
IE
.4. co
0 0 . 40L. %#C-Eq
-1--'CZ
C) a~ T--
0a ) (1 1 .4.C) L
E.. 0 c )O--C)L) Oa -LJ
0I a)= 0-) U) a) 0
CZ 0 N4-04-
> a) CC CL)
0 E. = cilU) .) 0)=
0 L
0 0-LL o- 0 CZ
TABLE 1 SOURCE TERM SITE SELECTION WEIGHTED ATTRIBUTES
ATTRIBUTES /CATEGORY FACTOR
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ WEIGHT31. WASTE AVAILABILITY 10%
2. SPACE AVAILABILITY 3%33. FACILITY MODIFICATIONS 3%-4. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION 6%
CAPABILITY
15. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT 8%
6. LEACHATE ANALYSIS CAPABILITIES 9%I7. EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY & CAPACITY 5%
8. TRAINED PERSONNEL 6%I ~~~AVAILABILITY ____
9. QA BASIS 5%3 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY ] 55%
10. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 5%111. SITE ORR REQUIREMENTS 5% 112. SECURITY/SAFEGUARDS/ 5%3 ACCOUNTABILITY
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 15%
Ij13. COST (FY)15
I COST3 [ 14 . SCHEDULE (FY) 10% •
1.TEST DATA INITIATION 1ý3SCHEDULE 1
[ TOAL SORE 100%
I nstAvailable Cop
Table 2. Source Term Test Program Proposal Evaluation Matrix
Descr~ipt-or -W h-scalej___ ___ ___
WASTE I10%AVAILABILITY
a. All 100TRUCONsavailable on-site. No 90transportationissues.
b. Most 80TRUCONsavailable on-site. Notransportationissues.
c . some 60 60 60TRtJCONsavailable on-site.
d. All 40TRUCONsavailable, but!must beimported.
-40Minortransportationissues exist.
e. Some 1~20TRUCONsavailable, butmust beimported.Majortransportationissues exist.
f. No TRUCONs 0available.
WEIGHTED SCORE 191616137
I TABLE 3 SOURCE TERM EXPERIMENTS SITE SELECTION PROPOSAL MATRIX
WEIGHTED SCORES
ATTRIBUTES/CATEGORY FACTOR LANI LL PNlL WID____ ____ ____ ____ ____WEIGHT _ _ _
1. WASTE AVAILABILITY 10% 9.0 6.0 6.0 3.0I2. SPACE AVAILABILITY 3% 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.03. FACILITY 3% 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
MODIFICATIONS
4. WASTE 6% 4.2 4.2 3.6 4.2CHARACTERI ZAT IONCAPABILITY
5. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE 8% 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.2DEVELOPMENT
6. LEACHATE ANALYSIS 9% 9.0 9.0 9.0 3.6CAPABILITIES
17. EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY 5% 3.5 3.5 2.0 0.5& CAPACITY
8. TRAINED PERSONNEL 6-% 4.8 5.4 5.4 1.8AVAILABILITY
9. QA BASIS 5-% 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0ITECMTICAL FEASIBILITY 55% 47.6 45.2 43.1 25.4
10. REGULATORY COMPLIAN9CE 5%- 5.0 3.0 4.0 2.511. SITE ORR REQUIREMEN9TS 5% 2.5 2.5 1.5 5.0
12. SECURITY/SAFEGUARDS! 501 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.5I ~ACCOUXNTAB ILITYREGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 15% 12.5 10.5 10.5 '10.-0
13. COST (FY) 15% 15.0 15.0 10.5 15.0tCOST 15% 15.0 15.0 10.5 15.0114. SCHEDULE (FY) 10% 6.0 6.0 4.0 5.015. TEST DATA INITIATION 5% 5.0 5.0 50.5
SCHEDULE 15% 11.0 11.0 9*V 09 ..TOTAL SCORE 10% 86.1 81. 75 9
A aiabecoopy
0 0IE
o-
E ~ 0
(na))00 0 -W w- LLm
'I-0 L.- 4U) %mC
U) o 0)
a)0 _ C
Ol _
0"-*E~ 2.E O~o~ 0)cm
0)cou*U
I 8estAvili!able Copy
0
CT a)
C:C
(1) 00
a, -~
o) 00200
4" %-
E~ C
0 0 V .I- CU
Cn Q)CUý cc
0 _z 0
0 a)
CDCU0~ Cff( a
C: CD -z Cn40 -x_
0 a)D zt=3 4"C) ;
%-- CU 0E xcD-e 0 :1-
'0 0- ca Q c~c 0L >, 0-
0~ C)0 0 . W 0 ClU) 0 f
C0 70
$tA'4 ffObfCo
4-0
0
-~ 0
0 UC)
-~J0
0o E En
03 -n 0)a0z I-) a,
0 IC) _0E
0 a,%-CD a, _0CD-
0EE
0 ~ U) c)40, 0 a E 0 0
0 0Z
o 0i >~ C0
a- 4- L L-
E3 0 CLZ a,
CD Cl- U)ý aa))-= U) a, -
>~ a) a, C zI- a ~ '0 (2) -zo U a, 1- -4
-U) 1.... 'o 0 0 a
U)z a, C0 a) c-% zo~/ C x )a, cC D -+ C a) 1- a, MI
a _ 0 a, U)- 00--f0 _0 I-' 0a, ) Cý C,) 4-
Cf) -0 0 -cz
a, - -- ~- 0 (3
0
I-c
Uc
U0)cU. -a0
* II-
ca c
cm 0 1_ 0
a) 00 U)- Lm 0
CI) ( t c c 0
0 0 E00
0 E* mmml .~ 2 .
Best Avilbl0 Cp
NIO
0)0
0
&- 0N00)
U) E 0
CNoo
0.0NO, wo
Cc ~ 1~ A.00 C 1
OWNED - -
* (=I
c0 0 CLcc o 0
~U) 0)) &ONC'
8eSt Ava~iable Copy
E
0
E _z
a) c
aa)
00 -C,
cz0 -0
%4 Ea)*0 _0 0
(1) -- fa
0r In 0 ------
4) 3 (1)ccnCD cz )
*E >
0-" 0/- -0E E"0 2a) W3 0) -
13c cF- mzc
EetAVailable Copy
0
1 () 0 0c 0
0 -
C-z
o cz E c--a) CZ1 E E
0 E C-~ 0 0
on C: 6 n
cn Ea) a) ~ 0) a.c,0
Q))Qa) C6C-a
0 EE~a
0 c'
0 0 00 CDCD a) C7
0
C/) Q)
c -0 cci) c ci
Ecz 0
C( Cd CZ
- ~ci
C:,
-o0 0
U 6CCED 0z C)..- -a
0z 0Ca)~ ~ ~ 0 DC
a)1 qO -# %C :Cli -z cif 0~ -z
Cd 00 Cd NC0~ T-- ch
Cd~ -0 %-)~ _0I C 0
0n-i -0 ) a_ L_ CCL 0
cn~~C -0(- -o.- O 0 .2!-
CZ ' 0 0dCL vi Nz CDd U
.3i 0r oi c6 r-
o~, .~ C'
07 21DI
Eý c fJ r , _L B eA p l ,7 l n