action items isolation pilot... · 2016-09-15 · action items developed in the course of the...

153

Upload: others

Post on 13-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ACTION ITEMS

DEVELOPED IN THE COURSE OF THE NOVEMBER 4, 1992

DOE/NMED/EEG/NM WIPP TASK FORCE QUARTERLY MEETING

NMBR ACTION FOR DESCRIPTION OF ACTION REQUIRED

1. NMED Provide EEG and DOE with a description of therelationship of DOE's Test Phase Plan to the permitapplication now being processed by NMED.

2. DOE Take, the lead in arranging for meetings between DOEand EEG to discuss the following:

a. Concerns about Xylene in waste expressed inrecent EEG letters and DOE's responses tothose letters.

b. The EEG-50 Report and DOE comments!concerns about that report.

3. DOE Provide the schedule/availability for the SAR and datafor Dry Bins, Humid Bins, Alcoves, and solubilitytesting to EEG.

4. DOE Provide EEG with a copy of the May 1992 draft of theComprehensive Underground Management Plan.

5. EEG Provide comments on WIPP's RCRA, Part B, p iapplication to NMED as soon as possible.

6. DOE Provide EEG with a copy of the "Waste Isolation iwPlan Supplementary Roof Support SystUnderground Storage Area Panel 1, room 1Geotechnical Field Data Analysis Bi-Annual Report" ofApril, 1992, that was mentioned during ToddBurrington's presentation.

7. DOE Provide EEG with a copy of the data submitted to theNRC, to support the application for certification of theTRUPACT 11 to transport additional waste forms.

8. DOE Evaluate a system to provide EEG with copies of allfinal--issue Sandia and DOE reports on the WIPP.

ACTION ITEMS (continued)

9. DOE Determine if EEG should participate in the nextPeriodic Performance Review of the SupplementaryRoof Support System in Room 1, Panel 1 by theSupplementary Roof Support system Advisory Group.

10. DOE Provide a set of view graphs used during the Nov. 4,199.2 DOEINMED/EEG/NM WIPP Task Force QuarterlyMeeting to each of the participating organizations(WPIO, WPSO, NMED, EEG, SNL, WID and the NMWIPP Task Force). (This has been accomplished.)

11. EEG Coordinate next DOEINMED/EEGINM WIPP TaskForce Quarterly Meeting to be held in mid-January,199-3.

2

04

=00

romz

)

0/Q

I Agenda

I DOIE/NME-D/EEGNovember 4, 1992

8:00 Introduction and Opening Remarks - Neil Weber (No -. I I s)

18:15 WIPP RCRA Review Status Report -B.Mouzh&ltc S. CoL,'&s (ko.s e

1 8:30 Opening Remarks - John Arthur 1, a"uk)

9:15 Opening Remarks - Bob Neill ~

10:00 Break

10:15 Stability Of Existing Test Rooms Of Panel 1 - Tod Burrington (A f11:00 Alcove Seal Design Status; - Ravi Batra (WPIO) -,

1 11:30 Underground Management Plan - Kent Hunter (WPSO)

112:30 Lunch

11:30 Status Report On Bin Preparation At INEL And Rocky Flats- Jim Coffey (WPIO)/Ron Guymon (WID) (P. . . ) w17

1 2:15 Status Report On The WIPP Performance Assessment Effort-Rip Anderson (Sandia)

3:00 Break

3:15 Plans For Source Term Experiments At LANLI - Bob Houck (WPIO)IRobert Villarreal (LANL)

I4:00 Summary Of Action Items Best Available Copy

q

II

II1 0I UI zI

Best Available Copy

ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION GROUP

NCO A EQUAL. OPPORTUNMY /A~RWMATTVE ACTION EMPLOYER7007 WYOMING BOULEVARD, N.E.

SUITE F-2ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MIEXICO 87109

(505) 828-1003

XL QUARTERALY MEETING

U.S. Department of Energy

N.M. Environmental Evaluation Group

N.M. Environment Department IN

November 4, 1992 Best Available Copy

Providing an independent technical analysis of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP),a federal transuranic nuclear waste repository.

EXAMPLES OF _THE EGs ROLE INSATSFACTORILY RESOLVING THE

WIFIISSIJES

Site haraterization,

o Deep Dissolution - Organized workshops,proposed testing and resolved the issue in1987.

o Brine Reservoirs - After WIPP-12, urgedDOE to move the repository location.

o Karst in Rustler - EEG-32. Propos64-additional testing.

" Breccia Pipes - Organized workshops andadditional studies,

" Repository horizon - Accepted the existingrepository horizon after MIB139 fracturingwas discovered and SNL studied the alter-natives.

Best Available Copy

q Transportation

o Transportation Risk -Have providedindependent technical analyses (EEG-5,EEG-46) to put the issue in scientific

I perspective.

o TRUPACT - Documented the inadequaciesof TRUPACT-I (EEG-24, EEG-33), and

I accepted the adequacy of right circularTRUPACT-Il.

Monitoring

o Pre-operational En' vironmental Monitoring

o CAMs adequate for dry bin tests.

Best Available copy

I EXAMPLES OF MAJOR ISSUESREMAINING UNRESOLE )BECAUSE

DOE HAS NOT RESOLVED THEM

Test Phase - Plans; keep changing. Still nofinal plans.

I Retardation - Laboratory experiments plan-ned now could have been done 10 years ago.

I Solubility Experiments - Laboratory experi-ments planned now could have started 3 yearsago.

Alcove Tes - Changing DOE position. Workion Alcove seal could have been performed.4years ago.

Room Saity- Pa nel 1 rooms were exca-vated before specific,. plans to use them.

Best Available Cop,

-CAMs - DOE has not implemented about 50%of peer review panel's recommendations 1.5years ago.

Flammabiit - DOE has not reconciled thedifferent requirements between a "safe" testand a "useful" one.

Aalilt of Waste for Tets M Only 5 binsprepared after 2 years effort.

Oeratoa Saet urin Test Phase - Untilthe plans and safety analyses are completed,the issue remains.

Safety Analy-sis Rprt-Excluding dry bin,tests, no reports or schedules for compleion.<-

Best Available C

TLC.) :a

cn L 0 ~' 4-0LOC

o0

4- %I--aU)~ 2 :3Qa -c) Q) U) C0 0 ( 0C 00

Cl) 0)LO(30cd a) -

E LE C)

U)

.0-0

00 0 co0ICE' 0 c J

a)!e~ fl--H LO e01e)iviabeCp

STATLJSDF TEST PLANA EXPERIMENTS

6/22/92 DOE announces WIPP Tests arefor purposes other than40 CFR 191.

11/5/92 Test Plan not available

*No identification of experimentsyet

*What data are to be obtained.(Pb, VOCs?)

" Alcove Drum Test

o Humid and inundated tests

o Dry Bin Test

Best Avail able Copy

I STATUS OF TEST PHASEEXPERIMIENTS

IDate ofSAR Data Available

Dry Bins Done?

Humid Bins ------ ---

A lc o v e -- --- -

Solubility* -- 1/97

I Best Available Co,

BIN LOADN SCHEDULE

o Expected in 9/91 Plan 48

o Actual Total 5

o Expected Availability ofRFP FacilityI

o Expected Availability ofINEL Facility

Best Available Copy

Cl)LUJ

x 0

ILULL0I Lw

OIonm g2 I

00

_0

* Best Available Copy

z i A q q hidr.. 9 qn ,- - - - - - - - - --

ri~~r- [i pn rrr' ri

1L!JLiLiLJLJLL..J..... Wj .JJ LKIJKIHHL

11s 1 LasS -. -j -f~ -n -- - - - ---ofr r , ~ r -i -. f.-- r1 ri ri ri r

II iI It Ilo

I I wL1: IJL LI L I U LI ftIJ 1I 1L LJ t

n, r' ,i 1r. 11If 11 1 . I ILi 1 1 111 U J LJ

r -1 rin r-s, r -w r

1 1 1 1

i ~ Best Available Copy

31FE

4-.%'

A If

0 z011P

IAI

V.4'

(j~_j

zz\

* j.~.-*, Z.~;/O

Q r (..

ALAR .,:O enc

z 0

o CL0D 0

z cc0Cu 0

o CD

>_ ELL4- +'54"

Q/) Cl) Liz 0

La.

< 0CL~ <Cfl0 U

0 00..0 00

-00 CLc t 0C

0 a) (

0 0O

0 0 0 0

*0 1

AA

x x

x x

AX X X A OXN X X

1NS'AILAfO X0 1 N W ETTXN

A &X

P RSU~.INSTALLATIONXX

-xPLANNEDEXTENS M-M x

BestLAIO Avibl CopX RAIA COM EC

*tO r

PANEL 1 ROOMS 1 THROUGH 7CON9VERGENCE RATES

3.5

3.07

3 2.8 2.742.68

2.43.512.49 2.5

2.19

2

0.

ROOM I ROOM 2 ROOM 3 ROOM 4 ROOM 5 ROOM 6 ROOM 7LOCATION

ENJANUARY - JUNE 1992 &JUNE - DEC 1991

Best Available cmp

I PANEL 1 CONVERGENCE RATES

LOCATION -CONVERGENCE RATE (IN/YR)JAN-JUNE 1992 JUNE-DEC. 1991

ROOM 13.07

ROOM 2 2.34 2.74

ROOM 3 2.43 2.51

ROOM 4 22..35 2.40

ROOM 5 2. 10 2.19

ROOM 6 2.49 2.50

ROOM 7 2.39 2.68

S1600 RM 1 2.03 2.42

S1600 RM 4 2.28 2.77 j~S1600 RM 7 1.77 3.580

S 1950 RM 1 2.14 2.57

S1950 RM 4 2.27 2.61

S1950 RM 7 1.64 1.78

Best Available Copy

IIII

j

I

lid I-

-

z

IBest Available Copy

aoen~ -~

II1

D 0

II

a.~ V W

M6-I

I 11'!L'Iii;

Best Available Copy

IIIII

*1~

(D

) WI

___________ I ~!~Df3est Available Copy

LB ~ ~Ofl~A~RA

0z

CN

CNI

cmc-JY

Iles? Available iCopy~ LLS S~ 9 SOS ~ L~ 9S 9SOS ~Jd9 S '~ -L7-nLt fl7ni . .aatdm-im in vmi n ~ .

CN

ar)

C:aQ

0

0

Aes Ailable COpy

S~ 9 S S ~ -9~ 9S29 OS ~ ~ id6 S -LZ- ou L! 07. Ja~ da n i ~' i V

1 0

Best /be )~

0 1 k I II a f!*8 (3

00

ci 06 11 LIE 0*fl II-

0((

Z~ 0

uJ1 10 0-U CL5(D

C-)+- . 0 0

0 >- . 0CC

o U _DCr0

C o C

0< q~0

U) E EE E- U 0. 0 0m 00

0 0 0 0 cc 0 a

ZI +*o ~s valbeCp

0.9

0 0

E CI

ED E) 0 aLU m E c

a, C 4-J

0 ca.z. z 00L~~0 0 CO ~

_~ 4-

C

00 Cc)ai

a, 0) CLU cn .ca,'

c00CIC

0 0 0.0 0( 0 :0 m~ 0> +- : 0) 0 0" -

CD C

LUH ~ ~ "( E c L 0 aE cu a) .4-'0L.U 0 CIO*.*

S-% C 0 0)) < C m+0 - a)

LU cuo

0 0 : n4J4-Jro 0 0 q >" 0 CI

* I. 0 0est Available Copy

PANEL 1, ROOM ICONVERGENCE RATES

LOCATION ~CONVERGENCE RATE (IN/YR)____________ AN-JUNE 1992 JUNE-DEC 1991

S1884 2.12 25

S1853 2.48 2.94

1S1841 '2.67 2.98S1802 2.85 3.07

S1758 2.93.57

S1717 12.885 3.39

S1681 2.39 2.86

S 1639 1.84 2.06

Best Availlabl. Copy

PAE1 RO

PANEL 1- ROOM6

2.3

2 .1 -2 .0 6

z

i1j~

S 1884 51853 S 184.1 S 1802 S 1758 S1717 S 1681 S 1639LOCATION

JANUARY - JUNE 1992 22JUNE - DEC 1991

ees Avll~0 opy

PANEL 1 ACCESS DRIFTS4 ~CON1VERGENCE RATE

3.58

32177 2.7 .6

2.3 2.42 2.57Z 1 2.6

2 1.7 1.64 1.78

S1600 RMI S1600RM4 S1600 RM7 S1950 RMI S19So RM4 S 1950 RM7LOCAniON

JANUAR~Y - JUNE 19'92 JUNE -DEC 1991

B3est Available C

39!LL69 Ste 9099L999O

swiILI5IL

ILwLw0

**;..~-~ ; ~Lu. LM.

0)0

P~est A Vallable, Copy

IL

0 0

0

0 o

0 LL

El.Best

Av ia l Cop

z 0

0U) CV)

w0 SIMO

cc;0

0

Mid 06

wI * 0 Ccco 00I-0

ooill t 0.be. ~ 6

I.LI .5~ uI Low

00

Best Available p

cr.)

0) 0M

'-M Cu m0MT Lm

L JCID 4A ) .

0L 00

.0C 0)0WE. 0 m 0 m 7E

u Cu : 0. CD C 0 .

oo OTh< Q:a 0 C4 Ej :

Cc 0 a. L.

MC (,1 0ý CuCcNC)c u E0 >C EC u0; u

0 0)4)~ E I- 4-0)

0 0 0 0a%est Avia)eCp

0 L

0. LLU 0I.0 01 w

LL0-0

mJ N w a N~ =

z z z CL UOLU 0&LU M 0LU LU LM.. 0WIIle

LUz CL .....

LUJ 0..z. .... .... ..........m.m..

LL UO... .................

.......... ... ........ ...........0.....

......I ... . . .... ..... .....

~~LU

I0

0I

0 0 _

.6 o -A 00

I0 0 OTe-

0 -W cm~

CC. > 0~'~ej

~0 ¶0 E w c 00co Oo

DOW.<U 0 "-' O0 00

Cf) 0) CLm~ 0m 0

CD 0000

oM EL 4) (

> CL 4)ow

E 0a

R~est AVEibecd

00

0 U'

C, 0 0 4.90(0 L 0 I'4.a m - 4.9 ftwoO

00LU 5 0 w -_)

0. .0 be IM0 owCc0 MEM M 1E0oo c0(CEcc

< 2 aw I 0 (Eu 0 amC

m 4C0) .0 <E

£0u w 00

wimm

(A orL m. CD. j. . C sum 0 0'

LIM U I

* E

FetAvaljlabl, o

COPY

II .. Z( L .

-- ?. IUI

LU a: LU il >.U) 0 LUJ

z 0 U 0

oU 4-----

am I'

V)

CAZ QL ...

U)

~QinN

LU I

...... ... LU ......

.... ....

U U ~t AailableCopy...

Uz

IL00

00w E0 0~

z 0 inw U .40

0 0DL

a 'm Co0, 0

z N Lm.

0 M

FBeSt Avahlable cr

0 0

0 - (. L

Lu."

0 0 00 I 0

00C* 0 4)L.

C. L.L. 0 C

QOME 0 75._C 0uC 0m MUM

CDu

00 Cc*. 0

Cl) LM*mm4wnow3: m 0~ C)0zo BCu NONI

ow MINIA0

Resovalbl Cp0_______________ ___B owI

00

zc .2 cc0 wU 0

0 L. 4 L

0=o0 Ow= 0

0c 0CE -0. 0 000 0%6 0

00 c00 00> E~

.0. Lm 0yu0 0 IE

0 A0

LLIj~ CDUCE0 O E

.g I

*0 CD. 0o

0 0 m.C

7) 00 02± ~0cc> UT 00 c0

ur 02C>. 0 0

tmes AvaloablewCCD

> __ 0I

Uno 0 00

0 0LU 4) 00

C, 00)~ c~ 0Z 02 0 mao =4 -I a) cc-

X 4) = "6. 0 : LinA

.0 ~0)o 00 6.6. 0~ MIT0 IL E

0m 2 .>%.2

X ml 0( 0 tl)- 0(0 .zLVi-S0 m

00 4"Lam..6. 0 ow' Urn

0a 06(D W0.W 0C0 6

Z 0".-W1 -- a0 00C m) 06 6 0

= 0

Best Available Cos

0 c

0 1" 00 0 o

oo 0c

0, > offi0

0> >~ 4)>

o 2 0 .0 w.w ) .2 a C

w00# > IEN JCl 0

0.20

000

Z < 20

*0 0wU

B~est A vai/abl C'e

0 c.J

Z OcoCcu> 0

0

El 7 0.L M0 0 Cu

0

%low 0* * ~ L.. (JP)

E %ME a. 4D

Lm 0~ cc<0

00

ILCD ~ CLO 00 0

0i- ow "a %-

Wo 00 Cu r

00 0 ~ .2 C0 ~ 4 CD~ 0u*mu

0 O~'C .) .C. 0 a 0~0O

( 0 0 C L C

0

8&tAvailable copY I

qu

~w

0)wZ

BetAalbeCp

C4U .

(M

04z. E00

o "m 0 0-0)

o 10C,) Lm.zi-a I"

M CUOU

W Z CLb 0

w .2Z) 0.

2:i. 10 005mC.)L00

Best A vc-iiab/Lo COPY

o 0to04

A.0

I-m

- CFo

'I- 06 0f =1

0 M M

Saw a..wo i

0 0 Co Ew -...

0 0

L- mr .2 w* w 0 0 0a m

ow~S Av%1i.able CIpI_______Sum__wa

.

-od

C'.J

0 00

>- O)

00

Mm

uj 0)

IL 4 0 0)0 >.

0~ 0~00L

E) 0omL a.rUa

Co 0 0LM L 0(0 L

0O

ý? Cvr:3~ Coo

.4

In

0

0 0

*

EE_ 0FM0.

E Lu cc.E >-

Cc 0EEc

U) a

2 S

*as AviII Copy

04

U-oL

U))

0 U-EE

U)0 0(AU U) (A

z *o U)* 0

0.000

z 0N '-%- c

Z0 0. im

E Ll0 oOm no

CI 0. MC- 0 0 *w IU 0.-0 U

0 00 m0 * z :j.. "0Ec - c E00.137)0 3o4.o 00 . ECO

'0 IM 00 *' CL0(. o'-' L- Cc

* 0 S 0

Best Avai~be Cp

CD

0I

0LUU

04-

z m

U)

CL C 0

ad..A

II 0.~l~ Mcp

00

o ~ 0

0 I)00 o 0tm m

E 4a0 0

0 L.

o m A

0 0

Best Available Copy

.14

In

CN

00

LU: 0 E

IM.

C: 0

al 0 140-CL ) i

00 ,.. 4 ~~

*M cl'Oa

!eOc

4

a.)

IP040)

Lu 0L.

- ~ 0

.0

Ow) . Lu0) ) ~ M 0LOr >0 00

mJUr0 Lo m -0 0LL L .00 0 a0L

LmE E E

L-~ )0 W.U

z ~~ M . .0 .Emil 0* o

Im moo* 0(~* diI .0 cc

13(Ut 0lalal Copy.

Cf))

Best AvailablE Cc;

F.t 4I-

FCIc

Izz

.9-i Cl:

4-57

Best Available CYpy

zz

cra)

z (t

u-

0.4~ Ut

Sct ;ct0

>z

Best Avail le-Co

HZ< S IE

cn - - - - - - -

a Ire &

U I

z P-4t)

-EE

OkUO IL 40dmu

Z cf)S IA~ 1~ U - Im a ~m1 4 I"~ - ,

BetAalal o

> a)

a) 'U ) V U

a) CD 0 4 E 4)~, CD E Eam -. U) E

-- 3. m )~6

E c 0

a) 0 - "0 -e .- 010- 0 w~0

CD goE Im U0 CU

4) Z) * >)* 0 00 E 0 E 0

- .0 E- ->

*0 ~ 43m 7*~ EE > -C

2 2 . >) c E

m OO00.

w C CCCL C

~ .. 2 2.2 E~ o~ 2-- 0 .E >~

61 CD 43 4) V) .0cn 0 Lo

a' "B) m clurn ur 0 E- IV ' m>6 (m D Cib -Za) >1 0 46 >U) 0

m SO C.2 t 0 m C

a 0Wia (D > 0C t

I0 0 M CG)C u I I.w C M

u CD 6 I

- 0- - - --. 0 --> m oC 0 CL

CC6>

0..

II I

U) )

> M- f to 0-E DE w aV to ±0E = c ) 0. m* n

eu E 4Q0±

-to In..- C C . ~ .- mC te -to o

E Eo *C = 0* m E >c Iol' C

CD 0

CCD

* m:m cc ~tto tt to m

) 0 >CCC~ >UCC C CC C C

L) C m Qmm m am0))6 L/ =)6 6)6 c.aCCCx Sm U))CCC C

L) 9) CL 0 p a))

=~~ ~ ~ toI nc SV naVIS o "U 0 m m m m m m comcc t

.00 0

0 0

0 . 0: C mCm Z0

- mn) .=5O; 4ermaom~CL -CL) 4w- mC

uC

w m 0 LO m 0

E E C EZ0

EV- 6

E 6.. -M 0M 6

c 4)> etAalbeC

II

e-E

ouu

S4-Dcx ~ C

0b

0 E)

.;> E

0(

.2 . fro 0~~o

...'E >_

0 C

* 0 C0>C .

CL

ccoo

0) c a L0 )

~~-_ (OOC

000

EEorrU;.200

0

0 :

-u 0CiCL05

0 - 0_

-2r

- o CID

zE Ecc 13C ) s--

0 0U~ 0 4

EE-

U

P4 -1= 0 0

U 0

Z0 Eo EW40 Los ~i~b p

C) C) 6.

U) -r

E E E EC

-~ L -

r- r--- - - -

v~ v 00 v(

CI) u

o d

0~C' C-,l4r~

F- --

C;

_ -72 -2 ME~

00 C-

o - cz

F -F .)cu ~ ~F

-cz

B e s A- _a la -n

Uu I

cu

S.-

-(u-

I-z

0

o c-

bin a- Raq Aim0

ZZ

Z Z4

C)C

NIs

Dog 0

co ~ cis

Bes tnj p

x_ _ _ m x X

I 1111 1D- OS Oft. as . *,4

al~' -i

- - - - V ca

1' dI~u

CI) - El 4El -0

4) C EC.

go w. -

EE

- - -- -- - -

EM /Aala l * C

LL << )Cd L) x

-D o:.CiQ ~ CD .

~CO C ) IeA cy ) cyJ~) co

CD,

0V

z CD

co CD

.4

E) D E r- . c050

-a T 0 0

> 0

0>> 5 05

U)

c C.

0 aI0

Cf) 4-

t.42) 4

H 2t

cta ) U )4

- -

4 ct c

r..0 4-

0ctct

_Best Avallabi copy

(NOO

0-4

C)'It

0 ) a)

01 A

7cc

z

IIu4W.

4-1

Ct)4 U-j v I.

c~ 0)

0t z~0W- ct4~ a)

PLO~0

ct3

Z :)

44-si).)At. f?~t Ar~r-~ -Opy

0

Zc,4

a)4- 1

%.t. cz>) x CL

z* *

(9X z 4-W u

4) 4-H a) a ,-ra

0 a)

0 a) -t

Sc

0t a)

ztt0 N

UI Ct U14 u ct4-

I a)5 a)

ct M 4

CI; nS

CI) a) >~ _

C" a) ---da

0.. P- VS J0c

- *1~BeSt AwvII Cop3

-~ 0 0J0 =l 10 cu U.9coa - U) CD

C13 I: CUC

cc E co C5 cd (D C.)LU&E E E 05E 0 C c c

E C

cm 0 U'G C CU~ CD Ec

0 U 0 0 aC, lU)

0L -DC.0"

E ) 72 .9 x 0= m5c 0 oC)F

OC, -t- D e 0rCD E, a,0

>r a) 0 -U C a r C

0)J C*JLD 9

~4 C/)0 c'j

co = 0 C.) a)

E HO _u

, 0 \1 a Z

CU C

b0 L)

0CU0 0C.) C.)

~<00CH 0l 0 U)Ul0= _l _ _

0 r =om 00 000 50 cc 0 7E 7E

E) .5 -

) Cl/(1 7

0 0

E F:

RegAvalgho py

CC,,

4-) 4-10 U~a6)

w A

- U,*za.

ow-0Kirt

~~4s~ a)~. < 0

\C/)0~/ /c,,

- crN F4 -ce.

000~CO. - - .

I ý>H0 / UCZ

I / >0/ 0

@0/

oetAvailable p

__________________________________________

50-TON CRANE

HFEF HIGH-BAY ROFHAC

AREA CRPANE 7

PREPARED DRUA

TRUCK LOCK OPERATING

80est AvailablCo

-V 7--

ON t ,alable Cop

AA

II

4tl

-641

DRMVNG\CORING -NEW LEAK-TIGHT

H{YDRAULIC

HRA ROOF D(TENSION OF

ot WCC CONTAMINATIONI [NilCONTROL BOUNDARY

HOIST OPERATIONS

ARM

DRUM

POSmTONER

TRANSFERROOM___

ANL-W WCC CONCEPTUALSLUDGE SAMPLING 8etAalbeCp

I I m

I 0

z 0 <0

I I I Li..

U) 0

-JJ

C.C)V)M1\0

Lhi

t;0

C) <

C-> Best Available Cor

Cr)

0

ILL

0~0

Best AvailI le Cop

co,

00

C.IL

u CD

MT

80tAaEaleC

cra)

cco

4-. W- aC:) a)

V) cn v-

C/4 cjt0t u** cjua M-' a)0o~- 4- a

Z~, cca)a)a0 zct c0

Best Availabi Copy

iceJ

W)

992

L~O -

piII

Bes Avialao

C14

ct'

Z V..4 a)Z

U ~i:ct

-t

BetAaial

iHP

e'J

/--O0

>1

q-4

Hz u

z IzU U

u -a) c4Sa)

00ý

06

U)I T-) -J C

CO to co to o

-0~~ CO 0 %

~OcccHo N rcIN~ Vf'

C)(%1lC~j LO r, v V)~

~C0)

0j C.)IsQ

00

8.5Lf C3

ID

>jI)) E.cD

SZ 2E i cz ic

0-4~ 4 m o D D =

Ez .0C4 DCZI-- 4 ~ ~ E c )Loc)C=

zi0-4 E a) CUO T ' c - V04a D o C

C)M .404!

a)C ) C

z ~ I T.- ADC 0 CD

0z xCc 0 w -t

Bes cvo~ CDop

z - ql, ..a

0C c;

n 0000CDCZVHoC

E c n(Q C)0

z0 RT CD-C C 0C

Q0N QC 00 Q

~CCc

E 00~

CN .0 Im CN 10 C

0 CC .C)DU~ a- C

0~e~ Avilb CopyO *.C

EU cCD LO 11ýrcn 0E OCD co ( O:M2E4 CD CD A

RZcCIr C

EDUC ID,2E CDCDCDCZ 00000 C C

owLO co)N

N r ZC~ to ; ; C

cZO 2E c cCD0z,-D00 CCV Q0()CDC)C

Z N C)C ;Q;C

s0cCaj

cn c E O cJ'4 y- c nC

ECNcDLnN:

Bes AvCOlaoCopIn > C CD V) (

X -01', Lfi a; T.

c,'J

cW o 00 LOC I)Ij U- 0]' C~j C\j

CO 0W ct O 0 0-\ 0 0 o0C

0) o

LU 0)CY- CY)M 0 0 0) Lo 0)

0' 0) C 0 0C 0 0 0 0 0)

CI)Cz 0 0000cI)

ZHJ C CYJZL 0 0. c) 00

0-4W CC\J 0 C~J OD 00f 0 N~~

z 0) 0 000

0-. LLrF- c) qtCY) CO)a: - C C() 't 0 0)

z z C C C: 0 0

1HO 0 a:- 0~j 0Z 0 0 0. 0~

m ~ cf N- 00C) %;:40 nCC C c r LO 0 0

Zo 0l 0 0~ 0

00X .L LW

I- - z zZ<<

(: iLi± = WI

LU z- 005 ~ I 40 cj .-1 z O

:r- LL Lu - Lu a. z c

00c/) C\l .LUC\j N C~jI Lf) C~j

c o~' c o C ) 0 0)V) 0 0) 0 0 0z C C 0 0

CD r-mLOC1WCD rm -C~ :

0-I -0 CC) C t Cz=) LNJ0 CWCf) ZCj)

H~tf-~ 0 to C~CZ~ 2 ~ - o-I LOJ0-4 00M)0T-)q T

N0 0 )Z C C )

0U M LC)O

t o o 0cOD CD C') C

W C-j C 0 L Cj

z zII.

u0o

<WWIT~C\iC) 0 LO Y o.-u 8e) Avall eop

______________C)

cr)

0 0n00 0

ocD 000c

CD T

CI) 000C

cr)Z

0.4ol cyj

C)t C) C

cr) Z

cts Ma1) > 04 l

x ~ -- ; C= ;I

00u 0~

BetAvia o

I0

L..M* 0

1C N

I ~E4C) 0 II- Cl1 0 0 0

0 E1 0cCU 0

Bes zviaqCp

N

Mawuim

No to Scl

.... ~ ....nmn ..lhid .esu

.. .. ....

TR143.7

SetAalbeC

0)4

0

o) c

0 0 m =E UU

(0

0o

0 CIOI) ca.

E - c~ wco

0 0

06

LL. 0 i .o

>

0'

0

000

0~s Avilbl CL

Ecc'

U)

UO)0 c c LUc U I c~j c

CO c C C CC Lu I U

114 o4 fo a C C4 CCM'

UU U~ ro

FU LU _ 0

cc a.LI. CL( 0

LC 3o LCD 0 IA

C5 I. -i

*00am

Best Available Cop

........................................................41 crooda lor

........ DOCS&I PhaseAPPM&M

.............. ...........................

... ..

"W" SOW1411,10% pmbabwaolModole for AUOUWV CmAodl Test Data and

P01110"IMISACO PhOnOfflonalogicIl Modele

an"

Cw=n*PAMOdeft and OUS Cawilallonal Annual cyclennual cle

............ .................. ........

Y" ..........ed wweew .. . ................ .............. . ........

- F

............ ....

.............................% ..................... .. ........... ......................... ...... ........... .....no .................... ................ ...........

........................ ..................................................

saw" .................... M Z

............ ... #tp

.. ............ ............ .......... ... ...................... -, - --- t,.............................. .. ...................... .....Enginserod .........Action

Alternatives TestrequWad? .. ..........CArnma Evaluabom Guidance

to an .. ........... ..........

engineered -IV ....... ....Rome ..... ..... .WtwnaW e(s) . ... . .......

........ ............low

.. .........plan .. ........ .......

.... .... ...... .. ...... .. . .......... ...... .............TOU Guidance with Aa-A Wwbw

Waste and Baseline Design........ Apwwwww,

.. ......... ............... ......... .... .......-- V ...................................... .......... I.-.,.-.-.-.-.-.- -..- -

................. ........... ............Z---- -------- --- .......................................................... ........ .................

no

.. . .... ...

Yea ........................................... ..

. .... .......... ..... * ., ., ...... .. .. ................. . ................ ::: ............................ ...... ................ ...............

.... .. .... ..... .............

................... ..................... ..... .......................................

... .. .. .... .... .. .... .. ..... ........ ....... ........................................................... .................

Performance assessment. BeSt Available Col

CO

E. 9

0)

CL

i~ I~ Jf j p'4' Best Ava'ilable i

IiI

j~cC0.

0). E0 L * W E ; .

~I I

.2 c a U

IL W J02

WI e

E *4) -j Vt a 0 C M

00 o e Q' E

CL) 1. .5~ f*

2 0.

al cc 0. c"i .2-cCL 0 2 0 of 02

Bes Avilbl Copy

Ic_ _ iCL

a a cN

CD am

04 a aw

CI a <

a a aV> > >

a c* **

CD 0

0040)

0.0

Cuu

0 00a

0 z 40

a.~ 0)0CS )

V 040 0 0)0) a (0-10 T- 04 4" m c ) . 0. V E

o- cco 0) 00'00 a) A-a_ ,0rL4m. cc 04 Cu C6

0 3c Z% SIE U) cc

co E) E 0 0 C

CCo0.~ >0 0 u~ 4.

Bes Avial Copy a

EI

CnEcc cr

0m 0 r.0 CE 0M M) 0

0 .. C CM -D

0 0 0 C0 ~~ ~ U)C LL

0~~ M)a

0r) cc . -CU~T U).~ . a

CL c 0o~~a 0)0 . )

E 0 a: - w 0in U)D -.5

0~~ Sn=-WC9- 4) 0. 0 4n= -% -

a) 040F 0 0. -0

a)q a.. 00a) n.. 2 0-

C.)a = C, C r 0 .. :4 C.0 Ca) ~-c.0 0 E

cn a) CL a- a)C 5:~E. 0. C s~i

0j 0 C c%P-) C C "0 w 0 CL lE L 0% C2 cc cc Er 2

0) .2) .2 .0 .2 211 CC00 0 0. 0c C4 0

E CL CD) cm* 0

BetAal0j o

C4- -w - -- ,- -

z. c-* CY

oR0- a

Hz p. L -

M - , -

.2 5

a. -

C, 41

zN U ~- -

a. .

I 0

to z

~ --- I---0 -

in --

uJ~~ I -

(flU 4Cca, - -- ----

- - --

w - -0 % - X - -0 a - - E

.0 CD CDlO

cc 2 a, ~.0 c

£6 50

C m e>b.a

t s- C0 6c

Best Avial Cop ýi .

10%, 50%, 90%, and Average CCDFs

for Discharge Plus Cuttings Dual

Porosity, with Retardations

Can tainmentRequirement

L...........1.. (1191.13(a))

10.1

A

i0-~ 1991L

Mean Whole Body Dose (1 mnremn)Less Than

Natural Background Levels10-' (about 100 mrom)

Risk Is Less Than I CR.PRecommended Limits

10-6 ia-5 10-4 10-3 11a-2 ia-1 100 101 102 103

Summed Norimalized Releases, R

BeSt Available cops

CC-

C1C(50) 0. cc 0)

0)~ 0 CgC

C 0-a. ~ C7 - -)

O)O) r0

U) &.) IL ) -=Cr 4 C1O 00. 0E 0Ua)I 0O cc0

E r ) W 0

CC cc 0 0 C~

.0~~ 0. cc0o .a-e

0 z ~ .. cc

cc 0.cc

z z

z z

N

~m. )I ~ Ecc

CC

00 0cC

13c~t Avilarble copy

0.

cc RIcc

0W

.~0

Bes Available

= ~4C

4~00

50

-4 4W Q

"4.

*~ 0. 0 0

L *u

Bes AvailableC

0)0 4n-------------------

o0 U . 0 ' .

a 0-

cc 00 ) 0ECu CO r, WY,

0 -q

0 U. 0-

CM E0 zU.0) LL'

0) m5u <am

_0 cOuj C)COh.~ .. 0 U

0 _ ZE0 CD . LCOU.

_) Ma-) 'C13 U LL U

M 'r m 0CC7ccsto

U)If u~eA z ile

CO 1JISlUWIOUS

Be0 Avwa~ Co

imi

100cr eda

a)* E

z

~U ) 9

00.U

C9D

0 > H < someIOH 5o A;illqwqojd

Best Available Copy

I..

100 Cuttings 00Cuttings

W 10.1 10.1

A90t

* Percentile

10-3 0 10-3

10-6 10'5

106 10-3 100 103 104 10-3 100 103Release to Accessible Environment. R Release to Accessible Environment. R

Figure 1. Distributions of CCDFs and summary CCDFs from the 1991 WIPP preliminaryperformance assessment. Figures Ia and lb show total releases (subsurface andcuttings) assuming dual porosity transport with chemical retardation in theCulebra (Figures 2.1-2 and 4.1-1 in Helton et al., 1992). Figures ic and Idshow the same curves without subsurface releases (i.e., cuttings only) (Figure4-1.2 in Helton et al., 1992).

A-7

tAvaw.lb co.

I lo d lo%

IrwormS** *

0i- _o

C)C Ej cC)

0

LuMLSE M ... ..... .... ... ............. .... .....

.. .. .. ..

.. ... .

..... .........b ........... . .. .

~ "3e@~3 O A~IqeCA

Pes Avial CT

I

oI >

Cc)

cc C

CD

00 CD

I 0Cc

U Nc0* 900 oAlqq~

COP

cc

00

oE

C)O

o 0 cc0 4)go tM Q

CcuU

L. - CL.-C

ow 0.0.

UCt m A0. C0 CuM

0.

8Ct Available C

CuD

COCCD m

CDa

0 0

E C)

0.0 -

U') 0 Cu.r

00 0Cho

00 0.ccccn~ 0 &M -0U cam CAu

CL Ed E3% z op

UU

) C

U ~ r cc' t;U~U

cu W.D m~~ E 0)

d) cc

-M) 0 c04

46.. Cu. 4) a~~0 0q q0 0

cc . . . Cc

E.1Ccu

0

Cc cc

o 0 i3

z

C~za. a)b S 0c.- f* c aCU

Best Available Copy

2 TABLE 6-1. SUMMARY OF VARIABLE IMPORTANCE IN THE 1991 WIPP PERFORMANCE3 ASSESSMENT. The summary presented In this table Is based on results obtained In the4 sensitivity analyses associated with the alternative conceptual models, with special5 emphasis being placed on results obtained in the best-estimate analysis (I.e., gas6 generation In the repository and a dual-porosity transport model In the Culebra Dolomite),7 and is conditional on these conceptual models, the numerical Implementation of thesea conceptual models in the WIPP performance assessment, the assessed subjective9 uncertainty in the 45 variables listed in Table 3-1 and the fixed values used for other10 variables required in the performance assessment.

121314 IMPORTANT1617 Borehole permeability (BHPERM)1sis Culebra fracture porosity (CULFRPOR)2021 Culebra fracture spacing (CULFRSP)2223 Drill bit diameter (DBDIAM)242s Fracture distribution coefficients (FKDAM, FKDNP, FDKPU, FDKTI-, FKDU, with plutonium, americium26 and uranium being the most Important elements)272s Matrix distribution coefficients for Individual elements (MKDAM, MKDNP, MKDPU, MKDTH, MKDU)293o Rate constant In Poisson model for drilling Intrusions (LAMBDA)3132 Salado permeability (SALPERM)3334 Solubilities for Individual elements (SOIAM, SOLNP4, SOLNP5, SOLPU4, SOLPU5, SOLTH. SOLU4,35 SOLU6)

383d SMALL EFFECTS OBSERVED

4042 Brine pocket pressure (BPPRES)4344 Brine pocket storativity (BPSTOR)454a Culebra dispersivity (CUILDISP)47 jT48 Culebra porosity (CULPOR)49so Culebra transmlssivity field (CULTRFLD)5152 Gas Generation rate for corrosion of steel under Inundated conditions (GROORI). The Indivdual variables53 related to gas generation (GRCORH, GRCIORI, GRMICH, GRMICA, STOICCOR, STOICMIC, VMETAL,54 VWOOD) had limited identifiable Impacts on analysis results. However, the presence or absence of55 gas generation had an Important effect on radionuclide release to the Culebra and on the effect that56 Salado permeability has on this release.57

6-15Best Available copy

2 TABLE 6-1. SUMMARY OF VARIABLE IMPORTANCE IN THE 1991 WIPP PERFORMANCE3 ASSESSMENT. The summary presented In this table Is based on results obtained In the4 sensitivty analyses associated with the alternative conceptual models, with special5 emphasis being placed on results obtained In the best-estimate analysis (i.e., gas6 generation in the repository anid a dual-porosity transport model In the Culebra Dolomite),7 and Is conditional on these conceptual models, the numerical Implementation of these

*a conceptual models In the WIPP performance assment, the assessed subjective9 uncertainty In the 45 variables listed In Table 3-1 and the fixed values used for other

10 variables required In the performance assessment (concluded)is1314 SMALL EFFE CTS OBSERVED (continued)1617 Index variable used to select relative areas of the stability regimes for different oxidation states ofis neptunium, plutonium and uranium (EHPH)192D fýarker Bed 139 permeability (MBPERM. 0.8 rank correlation with Salado permeability)2122 Recharge amplitude factor for Culebra (CULCLIM)2324 Salado pressure (SALPRES)

2728 LIMITED OIR NO EFFECTS OBSERVED

2031 Fraction of total waste volume that is occu pled by 1DB (integrated Data Base) metals and glass waste32 category (VMETAL)3334 Fraction of total waste volume that Is occuplied by IDB combustible waste category (VWOOD)3536 Fraction of waste panel area underlain by a pressurized brine pocket (BPAREAFR. effect overwhelmed by37 uncertainty In rate constant In Poisson model for drilling intrusions)3839 Gas generation rate due to microbial degradation of cellulosics; under humid conditions (GRM )4041 Gas generation rate due to microbial degradation of cellulosics under inundated conditions (M

43 Gas generation rate for corrosion of steel under humid conditions (GRCORH)4445 Initial fluid (brine) saturation of waste (BRSAT)4647 Marker Bed 139 porosity (MBPOR)4849 Stolchiometric coefficient for corrosion of steel (STOICCOR)50

5' StOlchiometric coefficient for microbial degradation of cellulosics (STOICMIC)5253 Threshold displacement pressure in Marker Bed 139 (MBTHPRES)

Rest Available Copy

I- wIr --- o,I0LIaLO

E- r

10

.lo. ....... .. .... .. -

-u r -..

LM .400

..

la .-0 ..... mcEi 3 j

...... ....

..... ........

IL

BeSt Avai!able Copy

:102 0

10-1 10-1 en,'

00

206-

10. 4 10-6

10-6 10-610104 '10- loo 103 10-6 102 loo10

Release to Cuiebma R Rdokr So Caleb's R

Duel PorositY. Gan*. No fRelal. I Times Sat D"ne Porosity,, Gas. mo aestg. I Tb.. 5a.100 l00

A A

*3 10-2 *3 10-', Udm9

.~10-3 10-

104 10-

-10-22 10-9 10- 10- 100 10' 10-12 109 10-4 10- 100 103Release to Accessaible Eswh~omm mm f. Rt Resaae to Accessible Enviounesat. R

Duol Pomisky Cass Owl~' Porosity. Gas

~1191.13(a)10-'0-1o Noan

AI

10-2 j10-3 /

10- 014

I210-6 I 04

10-6 -10-6

10- 10-3 l00 103 10-6 10-3 100 102Release to Accessible Environment. R Release to Accessible Envkonalmet R

Figure 4. CCDFs corresponding to the releases plotted in Figure 3 (Helton et al., 1992).

A-b 3~StAvailable Copyv

(08

CD

0 Ch

V

0 Ez

I', iD

"I1810AIjqq~

I3 ,3 A v i a le C p

c;6

0 CE

-g V~3

* 0 a 0 0 -C-a 2. 3*

a S -6 U ESa=c a -E

z I I

Li: * U

0 a x VE

Fiur 3. Cuuatv nomlzdrlae o aincldstasotdi h uer

(1991 ~ ~ ~ 3'P prliinr pefomac aseset Hlone l,19)

A-9a

Bes Avial Cop

.. . .. . ..................

. *cc* _E 1 a

c Eioco

OEM .

SP-t AvialeCp

45.5

% n CL~ C CO0 GI

0.0 - -a =

0) U)-0 c 0).

0)0 & O

CA 01- 0 00) 0C.IC cc V C

c 0 CZ0-: C E- -90-Z w0

cc IE) ca~ (n o ) )

.2 -0 10 0

M . .0 .00CI.00

a- c c

00

C130) C

*000)0

0 0)z

Avial Cop0, I

zI

0

U-U

slo

0AA0

U)-

00

V.. cm o

~cci

818 AvUa/eCp

CAAebu and Lhwwmfod 4Mwftemu d Ru&61w Fantone -cwsbra3 ~Shaft 3

shaft 2

NmO" ORZ

Whaft LShf

________ 4rb ORZAIdm - -ii ORZ 9- ~yr

WIN3 (a)

Culabra ad U~rvinud Mer~ra~ of RusiIet Fomuean Cuisbra and Lbvnd

Shaft

________________ ____________________ shaft S..I__________

M40138 Ttuuiuaim MIISSHalle Transiti Znr inn Na

AMVIftl A and 8S~DU6D Arfdirdme A aW IS

LOWafit Shaft EuwuI.

M813) k~wrDRZ Mte L4039I Transas FnZon.

3( b ) 1VA4242.5d7 I.2

schematic representation of rectangular repository/shaft 30 elfor analyzing undisturbed performance: (a) conceptual modelidentifying importance of panel/shaft seal properties, (b) econceptual model for identifying importance of anhydrite andfar-field Salado material properties. Case 'b" includes M3138,the northern experimental region, and a transition zone (TZ) butdoes not include individual waste blocks, panel seals, or the3 sump.

Case ua" assumes some degree of effective sealing throughout theg shaft, whereas Case "b" contains a single 10-in shaft seal.

i 8e~t~va~abICopy

CD

E0-

00L

I cuw_ 04

.2 0D C5 00" 2 a 3aYCC w

I. N1 .2 I- 0 CDCM.0 ca a?04 aDC 0 I y C c o q yaC

:- - r1cm CF)

0 0)CO. 00 D ~ (

8110A31-S 000iabl0 CopyVpsej~ u

00

I>

IE 2

0. 0

I) ()C

CcC

E cc

m 0Y

0 0 0JeAOOO e eej~ u= aIcoe6 >

CDI Y0w0VCC1

I ~~~~e go~A~;~ICpIoSRA00O ~u OLBGISE

0

ca 0

caa

00

0 0 CO N 0 0 ( ~ CD

Cc0

Io CLI0 I

Ccp0 c"1#1c

01

al)

C) ',EllJ

CC0 u)cam-0C.)

a)Y

0C

0U-c

0.0

0 (Uy

Lu' Eor 0q

IH l uJ 4SOM 941Aq p onP~d U ) 14O0

0i

0ODJ

0 IL9

V5 00.

U. WQ)0C13 cc 9

M CD

> M 000

00

=(0

0 01 0Cc

c~

Im

SA,

0.

U)

:E0

U)C)

Y

C CY

C)d eisodsE

SP- AvaIqCp

C-S

0) 0cia

C w -IP. I10_ loA O

C&

a) 00 0

0.= n .

a 0 occ U

0 C

-O S

0t a)Lj~b 0 c

0

E0 0

an )

E0

0 *')

co ~0<

. C0

0.

0 _)

z - Cl

CDC C

Ga) a)L. >1Ec

z. E 0 C\4 -

n cj ., L a)a)a)- C: a)E

0) .- C C:

C/) <oCo -aco (i6 0-0 0U 00)0 C:. EEC

0 0 Gza) a) 0 Ca)a.) c -0.4 .3 C0 a)0z aoa0(

c 0~ aa)E) 0 0 L- -

0 .1 a a)-4-aa) o

o-V a) CZ) ' a)

a) E 0 0 E

1)1*

IE

.4. co

0 0 . 40L. %#C-Eq

-1--'CZ

C) a~ T--

0a ) (1 1 .4.C) L

E.. 0 c )O--C)L) Oa -LJ

0I a)= 0-) U) a) 0

CZ 0 N4-04-

> a) CC CL)

0 E. = cilU) .) 0)=

0 L

0 0-LL o- 0 CZ

TABLE 1 SOURCE TERM SITE SELECTION WEIGHTED ATTRIBUTES

ATTRIBUTES /CATEGORY FACTOR

___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ WEIGHT31. WASTE AVAILABILITY 10%

2. SPACE AVAILABILITY 3%33. FACILITY MODIFICATIONS 3%-4. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION 6%

CAPABILITY

15. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT 8%

6. LEACHATE ANALYSIS CAPABILITIES 9%I7. EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY & CAPACITY 5%

8. TRAINED PERSONNEL 6%I ~~~AVAILABILITY ____

9. QA BASIS 5%3 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY ] 55%

10. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 5%111. SITE ORR REQUIREMENTS 5% 112. SECURITY/SAFEGUARDS/ 5%3 ACCOUNTABILITY

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 15%

Ij13. COST (FY)15

I COST3 [ 14 . SCHEDULE (FY) 10% •

1.TEST DATA INITIATION 1ý3SCHEDULE 1

[ TOAL SORE 100%

I nstAvailable Cop

Table 2. Source Term Test Program Proposal Evaluation Matrix

Descr~ipt-or -W h-scalej___ ___ ___

WASTE I10%AVAILABILITY

a. All 100TRUCONsavailable on-site. No 90transportationissues.

b. Most 80TRUCONsavailable on-site. Notransportationissues.

c . some 60 60 60TRtJCONsavailable on-site.

d. All 40TRUCONsavailable, but!must beimported.

-40Minortransportationissues exist.

e. Some 1~20TRUCONsavailable, butmust beimported.Majortransportationissues exist.

f. No TRUCONs 0available.

WEIGHTED SCORE 191616137

I TABLE 3 SOURCE TERM EXPERIMENTS SITE SELECTION PROPOSAL MATRIX

WEIGHTED SCORES

ATTRIBUTES/CATEGORY FACTOR LANI LL PNlL WID____ ____ ____ ____ ____WEIGHT _ _ _

1. WASTE AVAILABILITY 10% 9.0 6.0 6.0 3.0I2. SPACE AVAILABILITY 3% 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.03. FACILITY 3% 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1

MODIFICATIONS

4. WASTE 6% 4.2 4.2 3.6 4.2CHARACTERI ZAT IONCAPABILITY

5. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE 8% 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.2DEVELOPMENT

6. LEACHATE ANALYSIS 9% 9.0 9.0 9.0 3.6CAPABILITIES

17. EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY 5% 3.5 3.5 2.0 0.5& CAPACITY

8. TRAINED PERSONNEL 6-% 4.8 5.4 5.4 1.8AVAILABILITY

9. QA BASIS 5-% 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0ITECMTICAL FEASIBILITY 55% 47.6 45.2 43.1 25.4

10. REGULATORY COMPLIAN9CE 5%- 5.0 3.0 4.0 2.511. SITE ORR REQUIREMEN9TS 5% 2.5 2.5 1.5 5.0

12. SECURITY/SAFEGUARDS! 501 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.5I ~ACCOUXNTAB ILITYREGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 15% 12.5 10.5 10.5 '10.-0

13. COST (FY) 15% 15.0 15.0 10.5 15.0tCOST 15% 15.0 15.0 10.5 15.0114. SCHEDULE (FY) 10% 6.0 6.0 4.0 5.015. TEST DATA INITIATION 5% 5.0 5.0 50.5

SCHEDULE 15% 11.0 11.0 9*V 09 ..TOTAL SCORE 10% 86.1 81. 75 9

A aiabecoopy

0 0IE

o-

E ~ 0

(na))00 0 -W w- LLm

'I-0 L.- 4U) %mC

U) o 0)

a)0 _ C

Ol _

0"-*E~ 2.E O~o~ 0)cm

0)cou*U

I 8estAvili!able Copy

0

CT a)

C:C

(1) 00

a, -~

o) 00200

4" %-

E~ C

0 0 V .I- CU

Cn Q)CUý cc

0 _z 0

0 a)

CDCU0~ Cff( a

C: CD -z Cn40 -x_

0 a)D zt=3 4"C) ;

%-- CU 0E xcD-e 0 :1-

'0 0- ca Q c~c 0L >, 0-

0~ C)0 0 . W 0 ClU) 0 f

C0 70

$tA'4 ffObfCo

4-0

0

-~ 0

0 UC)

-~J0

0o E En

03 -n 0)a0z I-) a,

0 IC) _0E

0 a,%-CD a, _0CD-

0EE

0 ~ U) c)40, 0 a E 0 0

0 0Z

o 0i >~ C0

a- 4- L L-

E3 0 CLZ a,

CD Cl- U)ý aa))-= U) a, -

>~ a) a, C zI- a ~ '0 (2) -zo U a, 1- -4

-U) 1.... 'o 0 0 a

U)z a, C0 a) c-% zo~/ C x )a, cC D -+ C a) 1- a, MI

a _ 0 a, U)- 00--f0 _0 I-' 0a, ) Cý C,) 4-

Cf) -0 0 -cz

a, - -- ~- 0 (3

0

I-c

Uc

U0)cU. -a0

* II-

ca c

cm 0 1_ 0

a) 00 U)- Lm 0

CI) ( t c c 0

0 0 E00

0 E* mmml .~ 2 .

Best Avilbl0 Cp

NIO

0)0

0

&- 0N00)

U) E 0

CNoo

0.0NO, wo

Cc ~ 1~ A.00 C 1

OWNED - -

* (=I

c0 0 CLcc o 0

~U) 0)) &ONC'

8eSt Ava~iable Copy

IW

0)C

0

0_ >

4" 0

00

0

0 cc

.0 ~0E

0o 1. ZE

=. U) C.

CL)0 0 co

0) 04-

o .o

0.l C 00

E

0

E _z

a) c

aa)

00 -C,

cz0 -0

%4 Ea)*0 _0 0

(1) -- fa

0r In 0 ------

4) 3 (1)ccnCD cz )

*E >

0-" 0/- -0E E"0 2a) W3 0) -

13c cF- mzc

EetAVailable Copy

0

1 () 0 0c 0

0 -

C-z

o cz E c--a) CZ1 E E

0 E C-~ 0 0

on C: 6 n

cn Ea) a) ~ 0) a.c,0

Q))Qa) C6C-a

0 EE~a

0 c'

0 0 00 CDCD a) C7

0

C/) Q)

c -0 cci) c ci

Ecz 0

C( Cd CZ

- ~ci

C:,

-o0 0

U 6CCED 0z C)..- -a

0z 0Ca)~ ~ ~ 0 DC

a)1 qO -# %C :Cli -z cif 0~ -z

Cd 00 Cd NC0~ T-- ch

Cd~ -0 %-)~ _0I C 0

0n-i -0 ) a_ L_ CCL 0

cn~~C -0(- -o.- O 0 .2!-

CZ ' 0 0dCL vi Nz CDd U

.3i 0r oi c6 r-

o~, .~ C'

07 21DI

Eý c fJ r , _L B eA p l ,7 l n