achieving diversity in the legal profession through the educational pipeline prepared by the aba...
TRANSCRIPT
Achieving Diversity in the Legal Profession through the
Educational Pipeline
Prepared by the ABA Council For Racial and Ethnic Diversity
in the Educational Pipeline
Overview• The diversity pipeline:
What is it?Why is it important?
• Leaks and blockages along the pipeline• The numbers:
Early education dataLaw school demographicsLaw school admission shut-out ratesBar passage rates
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
2
Overview (continued)
• Impact of the numbers onThe legal professionThe judiciary
• Interventions – what works• What YOU can do• Resources
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
3
What Is the Educational Pipeline?
• The educational route to the legal profession for students
• Encompasses early education (Pre-K to 12), • College (2-year and 4-year), and law school
(including the bar exam)
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
4
Why Is It Important?• A robust, diverse educational pipeline ensures
continued diversity in the profession and judiciary
• Visible diversity in the legal profession and judiciary supports the public’s trust and confidence and enhances perceptions of fairness in the legal system
• The pipeline is the pathway to success in the profession
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
5
Why Is It Important? (continued)
• Lawyers occupy critical leadership positions and engage in policymaking impacting our communities
• Lawyers account for:100% Judges50% U.S. Presidents58% U.S. Senators37% U.S. Representatives40% Governors11% Major CEO’s
(Data current as of 2012)
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
6
Why Is It Important? (continued)
• The educational pipeline is the pathway to a successful career in the law
• A law degree and legal experience open doors and create opportunities unlike many other professional credentials:“Always make the choice that brings you more choices” – choosing the legal profession leads to better options
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
7
Critical Leaks Along the Pipeline
• Achievement gap• Dropout and expulsion rates in early years• Community college pipeline• Disparities in law school admissions and
academic support programs• Law school admission shut-out rate• Bar passage rates
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
8
The Achievement Gap• The disparity in academic performance between
groups of students
• Achievement gap shows up in grades, standardized test scores, course selection, dropout rates, and college completion rates, among other success measures
Source: Education Weekhttp://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/achievement-gap
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
9
The Achievement Gap (continued)
• The promise of a quality education is an important civil and human right that has yet to be fully realized in the American public education system (see NAACP Fact Sheet- African Americans and Education).
• We need to focus on the documented gaps in educational opportunity and achievement that separate low income students and students of color from others
Source The Education Trust, http://www.edtrust.org/sites/edtrust.org/files/USA_0_0.pdf
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
10
Achievement Gap (continued)Source: The Education Trust
hhttp://www.edtrust.org/sites/edtrust.org/files/USA_0_0pdf
Group 4th Grade Proficiency
2007 National Assessment
8th Grade Proficiency
2007 National Assessment
High School Graduation
Rates
Public College Graduation
Rates
African American
14% 11% 59% 41%
Asian 44% 49% 90% 64%
Latino 17% 15% 61% 46%
Native American
20% 17% 62% 38%
White 41% 41% 91% 57%
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
11
The Achievement Gap (continued)• In 2006–07, approximately 16 percent of all elementary
and secondary public school students (or 7.7 million students) attended high-poverty schools including:
See US DOE, National Center for Education Statistics,
http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
12
Group % Attending High Poverty Schools
African American 33%
Latino 35%
American Indian/ Alaska Native
25%
Asian Pacific Islander 13%
White 4%
Achievement Gap (continued)
• Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Students in High-Poverty Schools by Race/Ethnicity and Locale:
School Year 2006–07Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data, Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey, 2006–07,
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
13
The Achievement Gap (continued)
• Data show that low-income students and students of color achieve at high levels when schools and school systems are organized to support student successSource: The Education Trust, Education Watch (April 2009)
• Investment in early childhood development for disadvantaged children provides a high return to society through increased personal achievement and social productivitySource: www.heckmanequation.org
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
14
Drop-Out Rates • Nationwide, 7,000 students drop out of school every day; only
about 70 percent of students graduate from high school with a high school diploma. See U.S.DOE, ttp://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
• Two thousand high schools in the United States produce more than half of all dropouts. A recent study suggests that in the 50 largest cities, only 53 percent of students graduate on time.
• Research shows that children of color attend “dropout factories” at significantly higher rates. See Comm. on Educ. and Labor, http://www.edlabor.house.gov/.../o5/high-school-dropout-crisis-thr.shtml
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
15
Drop-Out Rates (continued)16 to 24 year olds by Race/Ethnicity
Source: US DOE National Center for Education Statistics, Condition of Education, Indoator 20,NCES2009-081
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
16
Year Total- includes groups not shown separately
White Latino
2000 10.9 6.9 27.8
2001 10.7 7.3 27.0
2002 10.5 6.5 25.7
2003 9.9 6.3 23.5
2004 10.3 6.8 23.8
2005 9.4 6.0 22.4
2006 9.3 5.8 22.1
2007 8.7 5.3 21.4
School to Prison Pipeline (STTP)
What is the “School to Prison Pipeline”?
Policies and practices pushing school children, in particular minority and low income students,out of the classroom and into the juvenile and criminal justice system
See What is the School to Prison Pipeline? ACLU athttp://www./ac;ui/prg/raciial-justice/what-school-prison-pipeline
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
17
School to Prison Pipeline (continued)
Factors Accounting for the STPP: • Inadequate resources in public schools• Zero-tolerance and other school discipline
(increase in school suspensions from 1.7M in 1974 to 3.1M in 2000)
• Increased reliance on police• Disciplinary alternative schools• Juvenile detention facilities• Barriers to re-entry into traditional schools
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
18
School to Prison Pipeline (continued)
Models for addressing the STPP:
• School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBS)See http://www.dignityinschools.org/print/247
• Restorative Justice PracticesSee http://www.ousd.k12.ca.us/restorativejustice
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
19
School to Prison Pipeline (continued)
Proposed Federal Legislation to address STPP: • Annual reporting of disciplinary indicators • Mandatory technical assistance with disparate
rates of exclusionary discipline • Federal funds to develop inclusive approaches to
school disciplineSee Dismantling the School to Prison Pipeline, NAACP Legal Defense Fund
(LDF)See LDF Testimony 12/10/12, US Senate Committee on the Judiciary,
Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights http://www.naacpldf.org/case/school-prison-pipeline
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
20
College Enrollments
•Race and family income are highly correlated with whether a student immediately enrolls in college. •The immediate college enrollment rates of high school graduates from low and middle-income families trailed those of their peers from high-income families by more than 10 percentage points in each year between 1972 and 2007.
Source: US DOE “The Condition of Education 2009”
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
21
College Enrollments (continued)
• In 2007, the enrollment rate gap between students from low and high-income families was 23 percentage points and the gap between students from middle and high-income families was 15 percentage points.
• In 2007, the immediate college enrollment rate was 70 percent for white high school graduates and 61 percent for Latino high school graduates, compared with 56 percent for African American high school graduates.Source: US DOE, “The Condition of Education 2009”
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
22
Law School Applicants: Interest In Law As Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity and Gender
Source: LSAC 2013, Behind the Data, Freshman Survey
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
23
2006 College Graduation RatesSource: The Education Trust,
Education Watch National Report, April 2009
Group Graduation Rate
African American 41%Asian/Pacific Islander 64%Latino 46%American Indian/ Alaska Native 38%Whites 57%
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
24
Community College Pipeline
• Two-year institutions are becoming more popular starting points for law school applicants
• Students who begin undergraduate education at two-year colleges perform comparably to those who begin at four-year institutions in both law school admission success and first- year law school performanceSee LSAC Report: “From Two-Year Institutions to Law School”
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
25
Community College Pipeline (continued)
Community colleges have historically enrolledapproximately half of all undergraduate students ofcolor.Who is attending?• 7.7 million students enrolled• Average age: 28 years old• Whites: 54%• Hispanic: 16%• Black: 14%• Asian/Pacific Islander: 6%• Other/Unknown: 11%
Source: Graphic Sociology at http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/2012/07/23/demographics-of-community-colleges-in-america/
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
26
Community College Pipeline (continued)
Community colleges are an important access point for low-income and poorer students:• Between 1989-1990 and 2009-2010 community college graduations increased at a greater pace than initial enrollments• During the 2007-2008 period, community colleges enrolled 1.7M or 41% of all undergraduate students living in poverty• During 2007-2008 one in five community college students lived in povertySee Why Access Matters: The Community College Student Body athttp://www.aacc.nche.edu/Publications/Briefs/Documents/PB_AccessMatters.pdf
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
27
Community College Pipeline (continued)
• Increasing law school recruitment efforts at two-year colleges may positively impact the diversity of future applicant pools
• More law school applicants, especially Hispanic/Latino applicants, are beginning their undergraduate education at more racially diverse two-year institutions
• Given increased intuition, population shifts, and the current economic climate, trend is likely to continue
See LSAC Report: “From Two-year Institutions to Law School”
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
28
Issues Impacting Law School Disparities
• Admissions practices• Shut-out rates • Law school rankings• Law school enrollment, tuition, debt• Financial support (needs vs. merit based) • Academic support and bar preparation programs• Stereotype threat/Implicit bias• Working within affirmative action limitations
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
29
Admissions Practices
Law school admissions criteria track key factors accounting for US News Rankings:
LSATGPA
•No consideration is given to factors that account for the successful practice of law as outlined in studies by Marjorie Shultz and Sheldon Zedeck(Shultz & Zedeck, Identification, Development and Validation of Predictors for Successful Lawyering, 2009)
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
30
Admissions Practices (continued)
Shultz & Zedeck Factors:
•Shultz & Zedeck identified 26 factors for effective lawyers and testing tools that supplement the LSAT
•Testing tools are race neutral
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
31
Shultz & Zedeck Factors (continued)
• Analysis and Reasoning• Creativity/Innovation• Problem Solving• Practical Judgment• Providing Advice & Counsel and Building
Relationships with Clients• Fact Finding• Researching the Law• Speaking• Writing
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
32
• Listening• Influencing & Advocating• Questioning & Interviewing• Negotiation Skills• Strategic Planning• Organizing and Managing (Own) Work• Organizing and Managing Others
(Staff/Colleagues)• Evaluation, Development, and Mentoring• Developing Relationships in Legal Profession
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
33
Shultz & Zedeck Factors (continued)
• Networking and Business Development• Community Involvement and Service• Integrity & Honesty• Stress Management• Passion & Engagement• Diligence• Self-Development• Able to See the World Through the Eyes of Others
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
34
Shultz & Zedeck Factors (continued)
Law School Demographics(See ABA/LSAC Guidebook)
Group 2011 Census 2010
American Indian/Alaska Native .8% 0.9%
Asian 7.1% 4.8%
Black/African American 7.1% 12.6%
Caucasian/White 75.5% 56.1%
Hispanic/Latino 7.5% 16.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander .3% 0.2%
Two or More Races/Ethnicities 1.7% 2.9%
NOTE: 2010 Census figures do not reflect 6.2% Other ...
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
35
Law School Demographics (continued)(See LSAC Data re: Matriculants)
Group Fall 2010 Fall 2011
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.4% 0.4%
Asian 7.1% 7.7%
Black/African American 7.2% 7.2%
Caucasian/White 65.9% 60.5%
Hispanic/Latino 6.1% 5.9%
Puerto Rican 1.6% 1.8%
Two or More Races/Ethnicities 3.8% 5.5%
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
36
Law School Shut-Out RatesThe numbers of student applicants who are not accepted at ANY law schoolSource: LSACNet.org, (See Data Volume Summaries by Ethnic and Gender Group and
LSAT Technical Report 08-03). Includes all ABA-accredited schools.
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
37
ApplicantGroup
Total Applicants
Mean LSAT Score
Total Admitted
Shut-Out Rate
African American
95,870 142 38,240 60%
Asian/Pacific islander
71,240 152 44,710 37%
Hispanic/ Latino
73,880 145 39,490 47%
Native American
6,960 148 4,060 42%
Caucasian 571,300 153 392,630 31%
Law School Rankings
• US News & World Report Law School Rankings influence admissions policies
• Rankings do not include diversity metrics • Rankings do not include factors accounting for
successful practice of law (e.g. Shultz & Zedeck Factors for Effective Lawyering)
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
38
Law School Rankings MethodologySee
http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-law-schools/articles/2013/03/11/methodology-best-law-schools-rankings
Quality Assessment (40%): • Peer Assessment (0.25)• Assessment by lawyers/judges (.15)
Selectivity (25%):• Median LSAT Score (.125)• Median undergrad GPA (.10)• Acceptance rate (.025)
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
39
Law School Rankings Methodology(continued)
Placement success (20%)• Employment rates (.04 at graduation and
.14 at 9 mos. after)• Bar Passage (.02)
Faculty Resources (15%):• Expenditures per student:
Support services (.0975) Financial Aid (.015)
• Student/faculty ratio (.03)• Library resources (.0075)
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
40
US News Law School Diversity Index See
http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-law-schools/articles/2013/03/11/methodology-law-school-diversity-index
• To identify law schools where students are most likely toencounter classmates from a different race or ethnic group,US News has created a separate index based on totalproportion of full and part time minority JD students (notincluding international students) and the mix of racial andethnic groups on campus during the particular academic year
• The Index ranges from 0.0 to 1.0 with 1.0 being a more diverse student population
• Schools enrolling a large population of students from anyone ethnic group won’t receive a high diversity index number, given the low likelihood that a student at that school will encounter
students from different ethnic groups other than their own
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
41
Law School Enrollment, Tuition, Debt• Applications dropped to 54,000 annually• First Year enrollment down to under 40,000
from 50,000 in 2010• Average tuition has risen to $40,000/year from
$23,000 in 2001• Average debt per graduate risen to $125,000 in
2011 from $70,000 in 2001• Jobs are scarce—especially for graduates from
lower tiered schoolsSee “The Lawyer Bubble” by Stephen J. Harper
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
42
Financial Support
• Law schools compete for admission of top students to improve law school rankings
• Emphasis on merit-based scholarships to attract high-performing students (instead of needs-based scholarships to attract low income, underrepresented and diverse students)
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
43
Academic Support and Bar Preparation Programs
• Academic support has been a critical factor in increasing the performance of students from low socio-economic and diverse backgrounds
• Many academic support programs have extended services to the entire student body to increase bar passage rates for accreditation and ranking purposes. This has often resulted in the dilution of services to students from low socio-economic and diverse backgrounds.
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
44
Stereotype Threat/Implicit Bias
• Understanding and addressing concepts of Stereotype Threat and Implicit Bias are critical to positive support, confidence and performance of diverse students throughout law school and bar exam preparation
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
45
Stereotype Threat/Implicit Bias (continued)
• Stereotype threat: negative expectations communicated to students (in particular minority/low income students) resulting in low performance
See additional resources at http://reducingstereotypethreat.org/definition.html
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
46
Stereotype Threat/Implicit Bias(continued)
• Implicit biases are those that we carry without awareness or conscious direction. These biases are learned unconsciously through exposure to social stereotypes and attitudes.
• Performance, or the perception ofperformance, is also impacted by theunconscious mental processes found in theminds of those with whom we interact
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
47
Stereotype Threat/Implicit Bias (continued)
• Implicit bias impacts classroom environment, curriculum, and ultimate performance of students
See http://www.equaljusticesociety.org/law/implicitbias/
• Implicit Association Tests developed at Harvard, University of Virginia and University of Washington to measure unconscious bias.
For Implicit Association Test (IAT) see https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
48
Affirmative Action Limitations• State Propositions:
• California: Proposition 209http://law.onecle.com/california/constitution/article_1/31.html• Michigan: Proposal 2http://www.civilrights.org/equalopportunity/michigan/proposal_text.html
• Washington: Initiative 200http://www.secstate.wa.gov/elections/initiatives/text/i200.pdf
• Fisher v. TexasFor SCOTUS decision seehttp://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-345_l5gm.pdf
For commentary pending SCOTUS decision see:http://www.lawyerscommittee.org/projects/educatoin/page?id=0003and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher_v._University_of_Texas
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
49
2012 Bar Passage DataSee National Committee of Bar Examiners
http://www.ncbex.org/assets/media_files/Bar-Examiner/articles/2013/8201132012statistics.pdf
Source: ABA Committee of Bar Examiners
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
50
2012 Total Minorities Taking Exam
Passing % of Total Passing
TOTALS 82,920 55,253 67%Note: ABA and National Committee of Bar Examiners do not collect disaggregated demographic info for bar passage
For an example of detailed demographic data seeThe State Bar of California site at: http://admissions.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/4/documents/gbx/JULY2012STATS.122112_R.pdf
Impact of the Pipeline on the Legal ProfessionSource: ABA Lawyer Demographics
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
51
Group Lawyer Data %(Source: ABA)
Population Data(2010 Census)
White 88.1% 56.1%Asian 3.4% 4.8%
Black 4.8% 12.6%Hispanic 3.7% 16.3%Pacific Islander Need disaggregated data
for API lawyers0.2%
Native American No data 0.9%Other Minorities No data 6.2%Two or More Races No data 2.9%
Impact of the Pipeline on the JudiciarySource: ABA Standing Committee on Judicial Independence
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
52
Longevity
Group JudicialDemographics
Population 2010 Census
White 87.8% 56.1%Asian/Pacific Islander 1.3% 5.0%Black 6.5% 12.6%Hispanic 3.5% 16.3%Native American .11% 0.9%Other Minorities .77% 9.1%Totals 100% 100%
Interventions – WHAT WORKS• Educational rigor, teaching critical thinking
skills• Instilling student confidence• Setting goals• Exposure to role models • Longevity/continuity/stability of programs • Long-term investment, not short-term fixes• Data collection, program metrics
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
53
What YOU Can Do
Attorney participation in pipeline programs:• Mentoring • Role models • Speaker bureaus • Internships• Field trips • Mock trial programs• Law-themed schools
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
54
What YOU Can Do
Attorney support for pipeline programs:• Student scholarships for LSAT and bar prep
courses • Support for law-themed school students:
clothing for interviews and internships• Support for law-themed schools: supplies,
trips, events
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
55
Model ABA Programs
• Judicial Clerkship Program
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/diversity_pipeline/projects_initiatives/judicial_clerkship_program.html
• Legal Opportunity Scholarship
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/diversity_pipeline/projects_initiatives/legal_opportunity_scholarship.html
• Judicial Intern Opportunity Program (JIOP)http://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/initiatives/good_works/judicial_intern_opportunity_program.html
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
56
Model School Programs• Legal Outreach
http://legaloutreach.org/?page_id=2
• Thurgood Marshall http://www.thurgoodmarshallacademy.org/
• The Ronald H. Brown Center Prep Program for College Students
http://www.stjohns.edu/academics/graduate/law/academics/centers/ronbrown/prepprogram
• Thomas M. Cooley Law School http://www.cooley.edu/
• UCLA Law Fellows http://www.law.ucla.edu/current-students/get-involved/outreach
%20program/Pages/default.aspx
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
57
Model School Programs (continued)
• Marshall Brennan Constitutional Literacyhttp://www.wcl.american.edu/marshallbrennan
• Street Law, Inc.http://www.streetlaw.org/en/home
• Just the Beginning Foundationhttp://www.jtbf.org/
• For People of Color, Inc.http://forpeopleofcolor.org/
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
58
Model State and Local BarPipeline Programs
• Bar Association of San Francisco (BASF)http://www.sfbar.org/diversity/index.aspx
• The State Bar of California: California Law Academy Strategic Task Force (CLAS) – California Partnership Programs
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/gs/hs/cpagen.asp
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
59
ABA Resources
• ABA Council for Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Educational Pipeline
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/diversity_pipeline.html
• ABA Center for Racial and Ethnic Diversityhttp://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity.html
• ABA Diversity Portalshttp://www.americanbar.org/portals/diversity.html
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
60
ABA Resources (continued)
• ABA Standing Committee on Judicial Independence
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/justice_center/judicial_independence.html
• ABA Lawyer Demographicshttp://www.americanbar.org/resources_for_lawyers/profession_statistics.html
• ABA Pipeline Diversity Directoryhttp://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/diversity_pipeline/
resources/pipeline_diversity_directory.html
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
61
Other Resources
• Law School Admissions Council (LSAC) http://www.lsac.org/jd/diversity/minorities-in-legal-education.asp
• Discover Lawhttp://discoverlaw.org/
• The Association for Legal Career Professionals (NALP)http://www.nalp.org/fulltextofnalpprinciplesandstandards
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
62
Reports and Publications
• The Educational Pipeline to the Legal Profession: A Thought Paper
http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/young_lawyers/thought_paper_resource_on_pipeline_diversity_for_pipeline_council_website.authcheckdam.pdf
• Diversity in the Legal Profession: The Next Steps http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/diversity/next_steps_2011.authcheckdam.pdf
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
63
Reports and Publications(continued)
• ABA Judicial Division Report from “Perceptions of Justice” Town Hall meetings
http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/lawyers_conference/2011_poj_writtenreport.authcheckdam.pdf (link)
• ABA Publication on Diversity: • Verna Myers – Moving Diversity Forward: How to Go from Well-
Meaning to Well-Doing
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
64
Reports and Publications(continued)
• Add diversity publications from other ABA entities
American Bar Association Pipeline Council
65