acg workshop, 17 feb 2004 – oata project concept of operations (conops) acg workshop, 17 february...
TRANSCRIPT
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Concept of Operations(ConOps)
ACG Workshop, 17 February 2004
Jose Varela and Ian Ramsay, SD/ESC
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Concept of Operations
Background The OCD Development Process The CONOPS Scenarios Use Cases
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
OCD (ConOps)
Vol. 2
OCD (The Vision)
Vol. 1
Background
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
2002
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2020
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
OCDThe Vision
ConOps 2020Issue 1
ConOps 2007Issue 1
ConOps 2020Issue 2
ConOps 2011Issue 2
ConOps 2007Issue 2
ConOps 2011Issue n
ConOps 2020Issue ...
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5
V3 V4 V5 OIx validation lifecycle
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 OIx validation lifecycle
ATM 2000+ Strategy
OATA 2011
ConOps 2020Issue n
ConOps 2011Issue 1
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
ConOps 2020
ConOps 2007
ConOps 2011
OATA
OCDVol. 2
(CONOPS)
Concept of Operations (CONOPS)
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
A detailed description of how an operational concept is applied. It identifies the functions and processes, and their corresponding interactions and information flows, concerned actors, their roles and responsibilities.
Concept of Operations (Definition)
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Concept of Operations 2011:
Description of the ATM System in 2011 The Layered Planning Process The Actors The Actors Roles and Responsibilities The Scenarios The Use Cases The Impact Statements The Operational Improvements
Introduction:
Scope Need for Change Assumptions
Concept of Operations (CONOPS)
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Description of the ATM System in 2011
Air TrafficFlow andCapacity
Management
Synchronisation
SeparationAssurance
AirportOperations
ATMComponents
AirspaceUser
Operations
InformationManagement& Services
AirspaceOrganisation
&Management
Planned Route Structure User Preferred Trajectory Free Route Operations Harmonised Airspace Categories Dynamic Sectorisation Enhanced FUA
Airspace 2011
Integrated AMAN/DMAN is used in some DMAN is used in many AMAN is used Standard MTCD is used Standard MONA is used Standard Initial CORA 2 is used in some
ControllerTools 2011
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
> 1 Year > 1 Week > 1 Day > 1 Hour
ASM
Airspace structure design & “Modus Operandi”
ATFCM
Optimised Capacity Management
Daily Operations Plan
CapacityPlans
Aeronautical Information data
Decision
~ RPL
ATFCM
FPL
X Days before Operation
CPL
Decision UpdatedAirspaceUser Plan
Tactical Flow & Capacity Management
X Hours before EOBT or Operation
X Months before Operation
Actual Status
Mil. ATSUsACCs
CPL
Airspace User Plan
Decision
ASM ASM / ATFCM
Airspace re-allocation/Re-consider scenarios
FPLre-processed
FPL
Airspace Users
~RPL
“IFPS”
FPL
PLANNING ANTICIPATING REACTING EXECUTING
ATC
Update Current Flight PlanAirspace activation/de-activation Implement scenarios
Strategic Pre-Tactical Tactical
ATCATC
Strategic Flow & Capacity Planning
Airspace allocationAllocate (scenarios)
OPERATION
Airspace Users CDMCDM
CDMCDM
CDMCDM
AIRPORTS AIRPORTS AIRPORTS
Layered Planning Process
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Aeronautical Information Data
Scenario&
Modus Operand
iSectors RoutesAreas
Daily Operations Plan
Forecast Demand
Sectorisation Planning
Traffic Demand
ASM
Military Operations
Airspace
Users
Airspace Requirements
Flight Requirements
~ RPL*
Capacity
Plans
Data
Forecast
Traffic
Demand
Airspace
Demand
Organisation Management
ACCs Military ATSUs ATS
Air Traffic Demand
CDMCDM
Airports
CFMU FMPsATFCM
Strategic Flow & Capacity Planning
Capacity Planning
Capacity Planning
Capacity Planning
Sectorisation Planning
Strategic
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
2011
Strategy ATM 2000+ OCD (Vision)
Volume 1
Operational ScenariosOperational ScenariosOperational Scenarios
Use CasesUse CasesUse CasesUse CasesUse CasesUse Cases
2020
Logical Architecture
OCD (ConOps)Volume 2
OCD - OATA Relationship
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Flight Phases considered as described in the OCD
Stra teg icF low &
C apac ityPlanning
O ptim isedC apac ity
M anagem ent
P re-Departure
P hase
DepartureTaxi
ArrivalTaxi
P ost-FlightP hase
E n-Ro ute
TacticalF low &
C apac ityM anagem ent
Gate to Gate Phases of
Flight
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Example of Actors Matrix for Planning and Execution of Flight Phases 2011
Airc
raft
Ope
rato
r
Pilo
t
Airp
ort
Ope
rato
r
Airs
pace
Man
ager
Airs
pace
Des
igne
r
Tac
tical
Con
trol
elr
Pla
nnin
g C
ontr
olle
r
Flo
w M
anag
emen
t P
ositi
on
Mul
ti S
ecto
r P
lann
er
Sup
ervi
sor
Aer
onau
tical
Inf
orm
atio
n
Net
wor
k M
anag
er
Flo
w M
anag
er
Air
Def
ence
Airspace Management X X X X X X XFlow & Capacity Planning Planning X X X X X X X X X
Optimised Capacity Planning X X X X X X X X XTactical Flow & Capacity Management X X X X X X X X X X
Pre Departure X X X X X X X X X X X XDeparture Taxiing X X X X X X X X X X X X
Departure Execution X X X X X X X X X X X XEn-Route X X X X X X X X X X X X
Arrival X X X X X X X X X X X X XArrival Taxiing X X X X X X X X X
Post Flight X X X X X
20072011
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Example of Actors Matrix for En-route Scenario 2011
a A
ircr
aft
Op
era
tor
b P
ilot
c A
irp
ort
Op
era
tor
d A
irsp
ace
Ma
na
ge
r
e A
irsp
ace
De
sig
ne
r
f Ta
ctic
al C
on
tro
lelr
g P
lan
nin
g C
on
tro
ller
h F
low
Ma
na
ge
me
nt P
osi
tion
I Mu
lti S
ect
or
Pla
nn
er
j Su
pe
rvis
or
k A
ero
na
utic
al I
nfo
rma
tion
l Ne
two
rk M
an
ag
er
m F
low
Ma
na
ge
r
n A
ir D
efe
nce
1 Aircraft Operator Y2 Pilot Y Y Y Y Y3 Airport Operator Y4 Airspace Manager Y Y Y Y Y5 Airspace Designer
6 Tactical Controller Y Y Y Y Y7 Planning Controller Y Y Y Y Y8 Flow Management Position Y Y Y9 Multi Sector Planner Y Y Y Y Y10 Supervisor Y Y Y Y Y Y Y11 Aeronautical Information Y Y Y Y12 Network Manager Y13 Flow Manager Y Y14 Air Defence Y Y
En-Route
20072011
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Scenario (Definition)
Within the context of an operational concept, scenarios are a description of how a future system should work. Each scenario describes the behavior of Users and the future System, interaction between the two, and the wider context of use. From a detailed scenario a user should be able to identify user requirements and potential business cases.
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
MTCD
Sector A245-UNLSector A245-UNL
Sector B245-UNLSector B245-UNL
Sector C245-UNLSector C245-UNL
DLH0002FL 270
cleared FL 350
Fix C1Fix C1
Fix B1Fix B1
Fix B3Fix B3
Fix B2Fix B2
Fix C2Fix C2
IBE0001FL 330cruise
JKK0003FL 270cruise
MTCD
R/T
DLH0002FL 350cruise
IBE0001FL 330cruise
Sector A245-UNLSector A245-UNL
Sector B245-UNLSector B245-UNL
Sector C245-UNLSector C245-UNL
DLH0002FL 270
cleared FL 350
Fix C1Fix C1
Fix B1Fix B1
Fix B3Fix B3
Fix B2Fix B2
Fix C2Fix C2
IBE0001FL 330cruise
JKK0003FL 270cruise
DLH0002FL 350cruise
IBE0001FL 330cruise
FL 350
CFL = 320 FL
Proposed Solution: Stop climb at FL 320.
AFR0004FL 320cruise
10:28
10:24
10:25
10:29
FL 330
10:24 MTCD warning disappears
10:22 Ellbow Communication
10:24 No conflict with proposed solution
10:22 DLH 0002 Stop climb at FL 320
09:5009:5109:5209:5309:5409:5509:5609:5709:5809:5910:0010:0110:0210:0310:0410:0510:0610:0710:0810:0910:1010:1110:1210:1310:1410:1510:1610:1710:1810:1910:2010:2110:2210:2310:2410:2510:2610:2710:2810:2910:30
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Content of a Use Case
A formal and rigid template comprising:
• Scope• Level• Summary• Actors• Pre- and Post-conditions• Notes• Trigger• Main flow• Alternative and Failure flows
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Obtain Flight BriefingPilot
Obtain Flight Briefing
Use Case Realisation
Ž
Œ
Actor Category 3 : Actor 31
Module 12 : Control 121Actor category 2 :
Actor 22
4: Result
1: Service121a( )
2: Request
3: Service121b( )
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
European ATM 2000+Strategy
Strategic Objectives:
•Safety;•Capacity;•Efficiency;•Environment
Airports
01
23
4Increase airport capacity
Reduce aircraft turn-aroundtime
Improve noise abatement
Reduce taxi times andoptimise taxi routes
Reduce fuel consumptionand atmospheric pollution
Reduce controller and pilotsworkload
Improve efficiency of airportground movement
Improve situationalawareness
Improve airport operation atlow visibility
Maintain safety atincreasing demand
2011
2007
•Human Aspects;•Procedures;•Systems;•Institutional Issues;•Environment
BusinessImpact
Business Impact and Benefits
Illustration
ACG Workshop, 17 Feb 2004 – OATA project
Questions?