acc4030 accounting theory course outline summer … · acc4030 – accounting theory course outline...
TRANSCRIPT
University of Manitoba
I.H. Asper School of Business
Department of Accounting and Finance
ACC4030 – Accounting Theory
Course Outline
Summer 2016
Instructor: Debbie Mortimer, B. Comm. (Hons.), M. Acc., FCPA, FCGA Summer 2016
Office: 366 Drake Phone #: 204- 474-6389
Office Hours: 2pm-4pm Tuesday/Thursday or by appointment
E-mail: [email protected]
Course Objective:
The main objectives of this course are:
- To describe and explore various theories that underlie financial accounting and
reporting.
- To explain and illustrate the relevance of these theories in order to understand the
practice of financial accounting and reporting.
- To critically examine the broader implications of financial accounting for the fair and
efficient operation of our economy.
- To give an understanding of the current financial accounting and reporting
environment from the standpoint of the investor and the manager.
- Increase awareness of how theories relate to, or contradict, real world events
- Develop an interest in current events and issues facing the profession
- Understand how scholarly research tests theories and can assist policy development
The skills and competencies you gain in this course will be essential for continuing on to a
professional accounting designation.
research
Real world:
-events
-current
practice
-profession
theory
AACSB Assurance of Learning Goals and Objectives.
The Asper School of Business is proudly accredited by AACSB. Accreditation
requires a process of continuous improvement of the School and our students. Part of
“student improvement” is ensuring that students graduate with the knowledge and
skills they need to succeed in their careers. To do so, the Asper School has set the
learning goals and objectives listed below for the Undergraduate Program. The
checked goal(s) and objective(s) will be addressed in this course and done so by means
of the items listed next to the checkmark.
Goals and Objective in
the Undergraduate
Program
Goals and
Objectives
Addressed
in this
Course
Course Item(s) Relevant to these Goals
and Objectives
1 Quantitative Reasoning
A. Determine which
quantitative analysis
technique is
appropriate for
solving a specific
problem.
Identify type of question (notably,
present value accounting (Chp 2),
decision making (Chp 3), and incentive
compensation (Chp 9))
Quantitative analysis in assignments
and exams
B. Use the appropriate
quantitative method
in a technically
correct way to solve
a business problem.
Application of present value accounting
(Chp 2), decision theory (Chp 3), and
utility functions (Chp 3 & 9)
Quantitative analysis in assignments
and exams
C. Analyze quantitative
output and arrive at
a conclusion.
Interpretation of actual stock prices to
theoretical stock prices (Chp 4), and
decisions based on utility function
results (Chp 3 & 9)
Quantitative analysis in assignments
and exams
2 Written Communication
A. Use correct English
grammar and
mechanics in their
written work.
Qualitative analysis in assignments and
exams (notably Group Project)
B. Communicate in a
coherent and logical
manner
Qualitative analysis in assignments and
exams (notably Group Project)
C. Present ideas in a
clear and organized
fashion.
Qualitative analysis in assignments and
exams (notably Group Project)
3 Ethical Thinking
A. Identify ethical
issues in a problem
or case situation
Identify motivations for various
management, investor and regulator
decisions (Chp 4-13)
Qualitative analysis in assignments and
exams
B. Identify the
stakeholders in the
situation.
Identification of stakeholders in capital
and labour markets (Chp 4-13)
Qualitative analysis in assignments and
exams
C. Analyze the
consequences of
alternatives from an
ethical standpoint.
Evaluation of consequences to capital
and labour markets of various
management, investor and regulator
decisions (Chp 4-13)
Qualitative analysis in assignments and
exams
D. Discuss the ethical
implications of the
decision.
Discuss impacts to capital and labour
markets of various management,
investor and regulator decisions (Chp 4-
13)
Qualitative analysis in assignments and
exams
4 Core Business
Knowledge
Entire course
Text and Website Information:
Financial Accounting Theory, William R. Scott. Prentice Hall. 2015. Seventh Edition. ISBN:
978-0-13-298466-9
Please note that while the text is the primary source of information for the course, class
discussions are important. Thus, you are responsible for the text material and class discussions
for examination purposes.
The course will be set up UM Learn. Here you will find lecture notes, assignments, groups,
textbook solutions, and practice exams. Follow the instructions below to log on to UM Learn:
1. The UM Learn website address is: https://www.umanitoba.ca/d2l
2. Sign in using your University of Manitoba UMnetID. (If you do not have a UMnetID, go
to the Iridium website at:
https://iridium.umanitoba.ca/ and click on Create UMnetID.)
3. From your Summer 2016 list of courses, click on ACC-4030.
Grading:
Course grade is based upon:
12% Group project – article research, due Thursday, Aug 4, 2016 (via drop box in UM Learn)
8% In Class Written Assignments/Discussion (8 @ 1% each)
30% Midterm Exam, 2.5 hours – Chapters 1-7, Thursday, July 14, 4:15pm-6:45pm Scotia
Bank Lab
50% Final Exam, 3 hours – Chapters 1-13 – Saturday, Aug 6 9am-12pm, 122 Drake
For students who miss the midterm for legitimate reasons, the weight of the midterm exam will
be allocated to the final examination (ie., you will be writing an 80% final examination).
Absence from exams due to illness requires a medical certificate. If you miss the midterm for
non-legitimate reasons you will be given a score of 0 (zero). There will be NO DEFERRED
MIDTERM exam privileges.
Students who miss the final exam must apply to the Undergraduate Program Office in their
faculty for possible deferred examination privileges.
Any request for re-reads of term examinations and assignments must be made, in writing, within
10 working days of the class when it was returned. The date for voluntary withdrawal is July 26.
Final grades are based on the student’s weighted mark and performance relative to other
students. The following are the tentative grade cut-offs:
Cumulative Marks Grade GPA
90-100 A+ 4.5
85-89 A 4.0
75-84 B+ 3.5
70-74 B 3.0
65-69 C+ 2.5
60-64 C 2.0
50-59 D 1.0
Below 50 F 0.0
These tentative cut-offs are subject to adjustment up or down depending on the relative
performance of the current class compared to prior classes that have taken the course with the
same instructor.
Group Work:
Article Project
The purpose of this assignment is to apply concepts and theories discussed in the course to
practical issues.
In assigned groups of 4-5 people, you will be required to select ONE article from a
predetermined list of articles chosen by the instructor. The article should be discussed in light of
theories or concepts discussed in the course. For example, you may relate the article to theories
which either confirm or contradict or expand upon the material in the article. The total length for
the article review should not exceed 5 pages double-spaced, minimum 11 point font.
Grading will be based on the following criteria:
Identification of relevant theories
Understanding of theory
Appropriate application of theory to article
Conclusions
Submission of the project should be done via the UM Learn drop box function. Please submit
one file per group
Each group member will have an option to evaluate each other group member’s performance. If
one or more members did not contribute fully he or she should be given a contribution score of
less than 100% (minimum = 0%). Your individual grade will be equal to the grade assigned for
the group project, multiplied by your individual average contribution score as determined by the
other group members. Please submit your evaluation via UM Learn dropbox by Aug 5. Note if
you do not submit a group evaluation it will be assumed you are giving each member a 100%
contribution score.
In Class Written Assignments
Starting June 23, you will be required to submit a written answer to a specific question, designed
by the instructor. You will be given class time for this task. You will be allowed to discuss the
question with your fellow students. Then you will form your own individual response for
submission.
These assignments are optional. If you choose not to submit an assignment, the weight of the
assignment will be added to the final exam. Grading will be on a pass fail basis. The “correct”
answer is not necessarily required to receive a “pass”. There are 10 assignments scheduled for 1
point each to a maximum of 8 points.
Tentative Course Schedule
Date Topic Readings June 21 Course Outline and Course Introduction Chp. 1
Accounting Under Ideal Conditions Chp. 2
June 23 Accounting Under Ideal Conditions
In class assignment – chapter 2
Groups Assigned
Chp. 2
June 28 Decision Usefulness Approach to Financial Reporting
In class assignment – chapter 3
Chp. 3
June 30 Efficient Securities Markets
In class assignment – chapter 4
Chp. 4
July 5 Value Relevance of Accounting Information
In class assignment – chapter 5
Chp. 5
July 7 Measurement Perspective on Decision Usefulness
In class assignment – chapter 6
Chp. 6
July 12 Measurement Perspective Applications
In class assignment – chapter 7
Chp. 7
Article Discussions – posted on UM Learn
July 14 Midterm Exam – Chapters 1-7 – 4:15pm-6:45pm Scotia Bank
Computer Lab
July 19 The Efficient Contracting Approach of Decision Usefulness
In class assignment – chapter 8
Chp. 8
July 21 An Analysis of Conflict
In class assignment – chapter 9
Chp. 9
July 26 Executive Compensation Chp. 10
Earnings Management
In class assignment – chapter 10/11
Chp. 11
July 28 Standard Setting – Economic Issues
In class assignment – chapter 12
Chp. 12
Aug 2 Standard Setting – Political Consequences and/or Review Chp. 13
Aug 4 Review and Article Project Due by 7pm
Aug 5 Group Evaluation due by 7pm
Aug 6 Final Exam 9am-12pm Room 122 Drake
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
It is critical to the reputation of the I. H. Asper School of Business and of our degrees that
everyone associated with our faculty behaves with the highest academic integrity. As the faculty
that helps create business and government leaders, we have a special obligation to ensure that our
ethical standards are beyond reproach. Any dishonesty in our academic transactions violates this
trust. The University of Manitoba Undergraduate Calendar addresses the issue of academic
dishonesty under the heading “Plagiarism and Cheating.” Specifically, acts of academic
dishonesty include, but are not limited to:
using the exact words of a published or unpublished author without quotation marks and
without referencing the source of these words
duplicating a table, graph or diagram, in whole or in part, without referencing the source
paraphrasing the conceptual framework, research design, interpretation, or any other
ideas of another person, whether written or verbal (e.g., personal communications, ideas
from a verbal presentation) without referencing the source
copying the answers of another student in any test, examination, or take-home assignment
providing answers to another student in any test, examination, or take-home assignment
taking any unauthorized materials into an examination or term test (crib notes)
impersonating another student or allowing another person to impersonate oneself for the
purpose of submitting academic work or writing any test or examination
stealing or mutilating library materials
accessing tests prior to the time and date of the sitting
changing name or answer(s) on a test after that test has been graded and returned
submitting the same paper or portions thereof for more than one assignment, without
discussions with the instructors involved.
Group Projects and Group Work
Many courses in the I. H. Asper School of Business require group projects. Students should be
aware that group projects are subject to the same rules regarding academic dishonesty. Because
of the unique nature of group projects, all group members should exercise special care to insure
that the group project does not violate the policy on Academic Integrity. Should a violation
occur, group members are jointly accountable unless the violation can be attributed to a specific
individual(s).
Some courses, while not requiring group projects, encourage students to work together in groups
(or at least do not prohibit it) before submitting individual assignments. Students are encouraged
to discuss this issue as it relates to academic integrity with their instructor to avoid violating this
policy.
In the I. H. Asper School of Business, all suspected cases of academic dishonesty are passed to
the Dean’s office in order to ensure consistency of treatment.