academic promotions applicant information session
DESCRIPTION
Academic Promotions Applicant Information Session. Monday 20 February 2012. Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor. Professor Stephen Garton. Academic promotion policy. Promotion is one strategy to reward and support retention of high performing staff – other options exist - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Academic PromotionsApplicant Information SessionMonday 20 February 2012
Provost and Deputy Vice-ChancellorProfessor Stephen Garton
2
Academic promotion policy
› Promotion is one strategy to reward and support retention of high performing staff – other options exist
› Applicants must provide current evidence of their ability to perform at the level for which promotion is sought (i.e. promotion is not a reward for lifetime achievement, or time served)
› Teaching and research are core activities
› Service – University, discipline/profession, community
› Assessment is by a committee of peers with ability to “benchmark” promotion across the University
3
Preparing yourself for promotion
› Read the policy on academic promotions and guidelines for applicants
› Overtly incorporate promotion criteria into your application
› Focus on achievements since appointment or last promotion
› Provide independently verifiable evidence
› Don't double-dip in the use of evidence
4
Preparing yourself for promotion
› No interviews for Levels B – D
› Familiarize yourself with the criteria required for promotion particularly via the Education and Research-focused streams
› LPC can change stream in which an applicant has applied (but only where they would otherwise be unsuccessful)
5
Three Promotion streams
The University of Sydney recognises three streams for promotion:
› Teaching and Research
› Education-focused
› Research-focused
6
Teaching and Research Staff
Promotion from - to
Teaching Research/etc Service Total
Teaching & Research: A-B, B-C, C-D
Superior/ outstanding
Superior/ outstanding
Superior 1 outstanding (which must be either teaching or research), 2 superior
Teaching & Research: D-E
Outstanding Outstanding Superior 2 outstanding, 1 superior
Minimum Standards Required for Promotion
7
Promotion from - to
Teaching Research/etc Service Total
Education-focused: A-B, B-C, C-D; D-E
Exceptional Superior/Satisfactory
Superior/Satisfactory
1 exceptional (which must be in teaching), at least 1 superior
Education-focused Staff
Minimum Standards Required for Promotion
8
Research-focused Staff
Promotion from – to
Teaching Research/etc Service Total
Teaching & Research: A-B, B-C, C-D; D-E
Superior/Satisfactory
Exceptional Superior/Satisfactory
1 exceptional (which must be in research), at least 1 superior
Minimum Standards Required for Promotion
9
Regardless of Pathway
Promotion does not change the type of role
to which you have been appointed – either
teaching and research, research or teaching intensive
10
Preparing the case for promotion
› Providing verifiable evidence – USE information, grants, awards, publications,
› Focus on personal achievement and development since appointment or last promotion
- lifetime record a factor, but not as important
› Resist the temptation to overstate achievement, for example
- carefully document your part in shared activities
- don’t recycle achievements
› Relative to opportunity
11
Preparing the case for promotion
›Get help!
- Seek advice from your mentor/discipline head
- Get someone to read through the application
- Reflect honestly on your competitive position
12
Promotion profile
› 2011: 229 Applications – 187 Promotions (81.65%)› 2010: 225 Applications – 195 Promotions (86.67%)› 2009: 208 Applications - 184 Promotions (88.46%)› 2008: 154 applications – 137 promotions (89%)› 2007: 148 applications – 124 promotions (83%)› 2006: 124 applications – 101 promotions (81%)› 2005: 140 applications - 114 promotions (81%)› 2004: 113 applications – 85 promotions (75%)› 2003: 103 applications – 77 promotions (75%)
- Female application rate is improving annually- Female success rates have been improving since 2003
13
Points to Remember
› Build Relationships:- Mentor, supervisor, the Dean, referees (international)
› Communication: - Written application - Get someone else to read it
› All three promotion criteria are valued- Balanced approach to performance
- You will not succeed on any one criterion alone
› If you’re unsuccessful in applying for Promotion- Discuss with your supervisor, Dean, Chair of LPC