abstracts and program masterclass v11 · 2021. 6. 12. · 1/5 abstracts and program masterclass the...

5
1/5 Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS The subject: “(POCT) Quality specifications in medical laboratory diagnostics revisited”. V11 Monday July 12 th 2021 CET 14:00 to 18:00 hours How can one judge if a POC instrument with test materials has the right quality? Is it reliable? Is it possible to define a minimal set of information to judge this? The quality of POCT instruments is increased over the last decade and many of them can now compete with the central laboratory. Examples of such are e.g. - POCT glucose from Roche ACCU Chek information II system, - POCT PCR COVID-19 from ABBOTT ID NOW rapid test, - POCT CRP from Orion QuikRead GO and many others. Important features such as price, user-friendliness, and correlation with other kits were excluded from this study. Within the hierarchy of features they are less important. Depending on the setting the thresholds can be adapted to serve a specific purpose. A pregnancy test (Y/N) answers to a different question as a glucose monitoring result. Lay-out MASTERCLASS 14:00 sharp intro, design, goals and speakers 14:10 entree exam 14:15 lecture 1 - Quality goals in POCT Prof Sharon Ehrmeyer (University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA) on laboratory POC regulations ISO 22870:2016 defines the POCT requirements for quality and competence. CLIA includes minimum standards of practice and CLSI has guidelines concerning equipment as well as the operations. CLIA also specifies educational and training levels. But are these standards and guidelines still realistic and appropriate in today’s testing environment? What is needed to ensure quality? A global survey gave a lot of information on current

Upload: others

Post on 06-Sep-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS v11 · 2021. 6. 12. · 1/5 Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS The subject: “(POCT) Quality specifications in medical laboratory diagnostics revisited”

1/5

AbstractsandprogramMASTERCLASSThesubject:“(POCT)Qualityspecificationsinmedicallaboratorydiagnosticsrevisited”.V11MondayJuly12th2021CET14:00to18:00hoursHowcanonejudgeifaPOCinstrumentwithtestmaterialshastherightquality?Isitreliable?Isitpossibletodefineaminimalsetofinformationtojudgethis?ThequalityofPOCTinstrumentsisincreasedoverthelastdecadeandmanyofthemcannowcompetewiththecentrallaboratory.Examplesofsucharee.g.-POCTglucosefromRocheACCUChekinformationIIsystem,-POCTPCRCOVID-19fromABBOTTIDNOWrapidtest,-POCTCRPfromOrionQuikReadGOandmanyothers.Importantfeaturessuchasprice,user-friendliness,andcorrelationwithotherkitswereexcludedfromthisstudy.Withinthehierarchyoffeaturestheyarelessimportant.Dependingonthesettingthethresholdscanbeadaptedtoserveaspecificpurpose.Apregnancytest(Y/N)answerstoadifferentquestionasaglucosemonitoringresult.Lay-outMASTERCLASS14:00 sharp intro,design,goalsandspeakers14:10 entreeexam14:15 lecture1-QualitygoalsinPOCT ProfSharonEhrmeyer(UniversityofWisconsin, Madison,USA) onlaboratoryPOCregulations ISO 22870:2016 defines the POCT requirements for quality and competence. CLIA includes minimum standards of practice and CLSI has guidelines concerning equipment as well as the operations. CLIA also specifies educational and training levels. But are these standards and guidelines still realistic and appropriate in today’s testing environment? What is needed to ensure quality? A global survey gave a lot of information on current

Page 2: Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS v11 · 2021. 6. 12. · 1/5 Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS The subject: “(POCT) Quality specifications in medical laboratory diagnostics revisited”

2/5

POCT practices and what features are desired by operators to improve result quality. The survey found that operator educational level and the role of the central laboratory differ from continent to continent (Sten Westgard et al., J Appl Lab Med, 2020, 480-93). POCT quality is dependent on many factors seemly making results more vulnerable to error (Maurice O’Kane et al., Clin Chem, 2011, 1267- 71). Are these metrics relevant in real life practice today? How can testing variability be eliminated or at least reduced? It is obvious that more work must be done but, also due to the current pandemic and the need for even more POCT, we are running out of time. The profession of laboratory diagnostics should define the test result quality and what is needed to ensure attainment of that quality (abstract finalized). 14:45 Q&AcoordinatedbyDrStacyWalz(ArkansasStateUniversity,Jonesboro,USA)14:55 intermission15:05 lecture2-POCTbytheend-user DrSnežanaJovičić(CenterofMedicalBiochemistry, Belgrade,Serbia)and DrChristianSchoenmakers(ElkerliekHospital,Helmond, TheNetherlands) onthePOCgoalsoftheend-user DuetotheCOVID-19pandemiceverybodynowknows whatamedicallaboratorytestmeansaswellasconcepts suchassensitivity,specificity,falsepositiveandfalse negativetestresultsarenowmorewidespread.Soeven qualityisdiscussedandtheappreciationofthose executingthetestsdidgrow.Sotheroleofthetraditional laboratorywillchangeasamatterafact:isalready changing.Oldissuessuchas–theanalyticaltechnique used,-thereferencerangetobeapplied,-thevalid interpretationofthetestresult,-thecorrelationwiththe conditionofthepatientandsoon,aresurfacingagain. Howeverfortheend-user,andheorsheisinchargenow, theyareirrelevant.Theend-user(patient,physician, passer-by)presumesthatallofthisistakencareofand thatthefinalresultisunambiguously.Thespeakers outlinehowthecurrentsituationischangedandwhat thedemandsoftheend-userarethesedays(abstract finalized).

Page 3: Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS v11 · 2021. 6. 12. · 1/5 Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS The subject: “(POCT) Quality specifications in medical laboratory diagnostics revisited”

3/5

15:35 Q&AcoordinatedbyDrStacyWalz15:45 intermission15:55 lecture3-POCTandstatisticalconsiderations ProfJamesWestgard(UniversityofWisconsin,Madison, USA)and StenWestgardMS(WestgardQCInc.,Madison,USA) onstatisticalrequirementsonPOCtestsandinstruments InacomprehensiveoverviewStenwillteachthecohesion betweentheQCapproachesofSigma-metricsand Westgardrules.Howdoeshealthcareingeneraland medicaldiagnosticsinparticularperformthesedays?It evidentthatoneneedstosetpropergoalsforthequality oflaboratorytests.Examplesofcurrentperformancewill begivenandtoolssuchasthemethoddecisionchart explained. "Characterizingtheperformanceofaqualitative test."ParticularlyintheCOVIDera,thereisaneedto understandhowtovalidatethemanynewPOCtests- antibody,antigen,andmolecular.Sothevalidationof qualitativetestswillbeoutlined.Thisbasedonthe assumptionthatfuturePOCTtestswillbeofthisnature.Theperformance characteristicsofquantitativevsqualitativetestsarethelimitofdetection, theCutoffInterval,theclinicalagreementstudyandcrossreactivity, amongotherthings.Calculationswithbinarydatahavetobemadetakinginto accountproportionsandcumulativedistributions,resultingin"hitrates".Are thetraditionalcharacteristicssuchasPrecision,LimitofDetection,andCutoff Intervalstilluseful?OrshouldtheybereplacedbyConfidencelimitsfor proportionsandProbitanalysis.TheproveofthepuddingisintheClinical agreementstudyprovidinginfoonPPA(Sensitivity),PNA(Specificity), ConfidencelimitsandAcceptablePPA,PNAA.InadditionMedicalusefulness andpredictivevalueisdiscussed.Onlinecalculationtoolsareshownand throughpracticalexampleshighlighted.Thisduopresentationprovidesthe toolsneededtojudgethereliabilityandusefulnessofcurrentandfuture POCTassays(abstractpending,workinprogress).16:40 Q&AcoordinatedbyDrStacyWalz16:55 intermission

Page 4: Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS v11 · 2021. 6. 12. · 1/5 Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS The subject: “(POCT) Quality specifications in medical laboratory diagnostics revisited”

4/5

17:10 lecture4-futurePOCT-futureproofyourlaboratory ProfIvanBrandslund(SDU,Denmark) onthefutureoflaboratoryPOC Wehavetorethinkthefuture.“Ifyoucan’t measureit,youcan’tmanageit”isoftenquoted asasayingfromDr.W.EdwardsDeming.Butthis isonlyoneaspectofmedicaldecisionmaking throughlaboratorydiagnostics.Majorissuesare qualityandspeed.Sothefutureoflaboratory serviceswillbe‘qualitysufficienttoanswerthemedicalquestionasked’and ‘ondemand’.Sowearelookingfortestsettingsthatcanliveuptothesenew standards.Consequentlytheroleofthetraditionalmedicallaboratorywill change.Moreoveritwillbeachallengeforthetraditionalmedicallaboratory tostayinvolved.Newtechniquessuchasimmunosensors(graphene electrochemicalsensors,JournalSensors,BiljanaMojsoskaetal.,2021,21, 390)willbeexplainedandtheirpossibleapplicationsoutlined.Howfarcan thisanalyticalplatformbeenstretched,whichassayscanbeperformed?The DutchSpiroNosehassomepossibilitiestoo:fastbutisitreliableenough? Futureisanattitude!Howbrightwillitbe?(abstractpending,workin progress). 17:40 Q&AcoordinatedbyDrStacyWalz17:50 exitexam,conclusion byDrHenkGoldschmidt (QualityintheSpotlightFoundation,Tilburg, TheNetherlands)18:00 sharp closingSponsorsSelectedreadingsavailableonthewebsiteaftermailedrequestandregistrationTheregistrationfeeis75euro,theregistrationformcanbefoundonthewebsitehttps://qualityinthespotlight.com/.Thefeeincludesdigitalconferencematerials.

Page 5: Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS v11 · 2021. 6. 12. · 1/5 Abstracts and program MASTERCLASS The subject: “(POCT) Quality specifications in medical laboratory diagnostics revisited”

5/5

ThisMASTERCLASS‘QualityintheSpotlight’onPOCTdiagnosticlaboratorytestingofJuly12th2021isexecutedundertheauspicesofIFCC(InternationalFederationofClinicalChemistryandLaboratoryMedicine)andundertheauspicesoftheEFLM(EuropeanFederationofClinicalChemistryandLaboratoryMedicine).

EMTunderreview