a second warning by the club of rome

1
31 A SECOND WARNING BY THE CLUB OF ROME The Club of Rome published in the Fall of 1972 a little book on The Limits To Growth* which shocked the world. Over a long period of time men have tried to obtain maximum output with minimum input and efforts with the final goal: attainment of the greatest material welfare. Now someone warned that this exertion would lead to disaster. The Club, an international group of approximately thirty scholars, scientists, industrialists, and bankers had sponsored a research by Dennis Meadows of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who, with the help of associates, showed that industrial i rowth is limited and that mankind is close to the borderline and in some instances has already passed it) beyond which lies destruction. Mankind, they stated, was on the way to suicide. Their advice was to stop the speedy increase of production to which we had proudly committed ourselves and thus to avoid catastrophic ecological consequences and total exhaustion of resources and materials. Prompt action was necessary. Of course, critics had quick replies, some of them justified, but the warning by the Club of Rome drew wide attention and produced a great impact. During October 1974 at the meeting of the Club in Berlin a second report was submitted. This continued the study of mankind's predicament, but it explored in greater detail the expected develop- ments in various regions of the world. Mihajlo Mesarovic of the Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, and Edward Pestel of the Technical University Hanover in Germany, reported on Die Menschkeit am Wendepunkt (Mankind on the Turning Point). The report was more complete and more comprehensive but no less shocking than the first report of 1972. It showed a gloomy picture for the immediate future and tried to impress on the rich industrial countries of the world that they would have to learn to make sacrifices and to give up many of those things which have made life more comfortable. The report reiterated that the speedy development and increasing growth of industrial production would have to be reduced drastically or it had to be stopped entirely. In addition to its consideration of the effects of unlimited industrial growth, the study also compared population growth and food production. They argue that a prompt and efficient population policy alone would not bring a prompt solution to the many grave problems. In some parts of the world such as Asia and South America a stationary population would be reached only after 75 years, when the population had already doubled, since half of the present population in these regions is less than 16 years old, not yet in the childbearing age. On the other hand, the quantities of foodstuff per capita did not increase since 1936, in fact they were reduced during the last few years. Serious consequences are obvious. The report states: if nothing is done right now 500 millions of children will starve within 50 years. Interesting are the studies connected with the consequences of the high oil prices. It is indicated that the low prices of the past would have lead to great economic difficulties in the long run. The exploitation of the oil reserves at low market prices would not have stimulated search for new energy sources. The future now depends largely on the productional behavior of the industrial countries.

Upload: ludwig-h-mai

Post on 19-Aug-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

31

A SECOND WARNING BY THE CLUB OF ROME

The Club of Rome publ ished in the Fa l l of 1972 a l i t t l e book on The L im i t s To Growth* which shocked the wor ld . Over a long per iod of t ime men have t r i e d to ob ta in maximum outpu t w i th minimum inpu t and e f f o r t s w i th the f i n a l goa l : a t t a i nmen t of the g rea tes t ma te r i a l we l f a re . Now someone warned tha t t h i s e x e r t i o n would lead to d i s a s t e r .

The Club, an i n t e r n a t i o n a l group of approx imate ly t h i r t y scho la r s , s c i e n t i s t s , i n d u s t r i a l i s t s , and bankers had sponsored a research by Dennis Meadows of the Massachusetts I n s t i t u t e of Technology who, w i th the help of assoc ia tes , showed t ha t i n d u s t r i a l

i rowth is l i m i t e d and t ha t mankind is c lose to the b o r d e r l i n e and in some ins tances has a l ready passed i t ) beyond which l i e s

d e s t r u c t i o n . Mankind, they s t a t e d , was on the way to s u i c i d e . The i r advice was to stop the speedy increase of p roduc t ion to which we had proud ly committed ourse lves and thus to avoid c a t a s t r o p h i c eco log i ca l consequences and t o t a l exhaust ion of resources and m a t e r i a l s . Prompt ac t i on was necessary.

Of course, c r i t i c s had quick r e p l i e s , some of them j u s t i f i e d , but the warning by the Club of Rome drew wide a t t e n t i o n and produced a great impact.

During October 1974 at the meeting of the Club in B e r l i n a second repo r t was submi t ted . This cont inued the study of mankind 's predicament , but i t explored in g rea te r d e t a i l the expected deve lop- ments in var ious regions of the wor ld . M iha j l o Mesarovic of the Case Western Reserve U n i v e r s i t y in C leve land, and Edward Pestel of the Technica l U n i v e r s i t y Hanover in Germany, repor ted on Die Menschkeit am Wendepunkt (Mankind on the Turn ing P o i n t ) . The repo r t was more complete and more comprehensive but no less shocking than the f i r s t r e p o r t of 1972. I t showed a gloomy p i c t u r e f o r the immediate f u t u r e and t r i e d to impress on the r i ch i n d u s t r i a l coun t r i es of the wor ld t ha t they would have to learn to make s a c r i f i c e s and to give up many of those th ings which have made l i f e more comfo r tab le . The repo r t r e i t e r a t e d tha t the speedy development and i nc reas ing growth of i n d u s t r i a l p roduc t ion would have to be reduced d r a s t i c a l l y or i t had to be stopped e n t i r e l y .

In a d d i t i o n to i t s c o n s i d e r a t i o n of the e f f e c t s of u n l i m i t e d i n d u s t r i a l growth, the study also compared popu la t i on growth and food p roduc t i on . They argue tha t a prompt and e f f i c i e n t popu la t i on p o l i c y alone would not b r ing a prompt s o l u t i o n to the many grave problems. In some par ts of the wor ld such as Asia and South America a s t a t i o n a r y popu la t ion would be reached only a f t e r 75 yea rs , when the popu la t i on had a l ready doubled, s ince h a l f of the present popu la t i on in these regions is less than 16 years o l d , not ye t in the c h i l d b e a r i n g age. On the o ther hand, the q u a n t i t i e s of f o o d s t u f f per cap i ta did not increase since 1936, in f a c t they were reduced dur ing the l a s t few years . Serious consequences are obvious. The repo r t s t a t e s : i f noth ing is done r i g h t now 500 m i l l i o n s of c h i l d r e n w i l l s tarve w i t h i n 50 years .

I n t e r e s t i n g are the s tud ies connected w i th the consequences of the high o i l p r i c e s . I t is i nd i ca ted tha t the low pr ices of the past would have lead to great economic d i f f i c u l t i e s in the long run. The e x p l o i t a t i o n of the o i l reserves at low market p r i ces would not have s t imu la ted search f o r new energy sources. The f u t u r e now depends l a r g e l y on the p roduc t i ona l behavior of the i n d u s t r i a l c o u n t r i e s .