a parker hughes assoc maintaining pfp systems in petrochem facilities.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Maintaining Passive Fire Protection
Systems in a Petro-chemical Facility
By:
Arthur J. Parker, P.E.
William P. Wheeler, P.E.
Senior Fire Protection Engineers
NACE International Bring on the Heat Conference
New Orleans, LA June 4-6, 2013
![Page 2: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Presentation Outline
Plant Safety Audits
Preparation For An Audit
Audit Report
Fire Protection Features Commonly Reviewed
Case Study and Lessons Learned
2
![Page 3: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Plant Safety Audit
Auditor will review:
Loss Prevention Program records
Overall plant operations
Personnel training records
Process documents
Operations documentation
Safety plans/hazards identification
Site inspection
3
![Page 4: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Plant Safety Audit
Who is the auditor?
Owner/Owner Representative
• Compliance Inspector/Officer
• Outside Inspection Agency
Federal, State, Local Jurisdiction
Insurer
Who the auditor is influences inspection
4
![Page 5: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is Commonly Audited
PQV (Program Quality Verification)
P – Program
Does the loss prevention program cover all
required topics, plant areas, etc.
Q – Quality
Does the program have adequate detail,
technical basis, etc.
V – Verification
Does the audit verify the program is being
implemented as stated 5
![Page 6: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3 Keys to Successful Audit
1. Documentation
2. Documentation
3. Documentation
6
![Page 7: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Audit Preparation
Process diagrams
PFDs, P&IDs, inventory
MSDS sheets
Up-to-date documentation & records
Pre-Inspection
Regular inspection
and maintenance
7
![Page 8: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Audit Report
Issued upon completion of audit
Formal vs. informal – still a business
record
Determined by who the auditor was and
purpose of audit (internal or external)
Dictates response detail
8
![Page 9: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Audit Report (Cont.)
Likely contains recommendations
Recommendation tracking system critical
Prepare written response to each
recommendation
Address the hazard identified, not necessarily
the recommendation as worded
Develop SMART plans of action to address
each recommendation
Document, Document, Document
9
![Page 10: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SMART Plan
S – Specific
Avoid vague responses
M – Measureable
Able to “measure” completion of action
A – Attainable
R – Relevant
T – Time bound
Set due dates 10
![Page 11: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Fire Protection
Features/Systems Audited
Active Systems
Fire Pumps
Water Supply
Monitors
Detection Systems
Suppression Systems
11
![Page 12: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Fire Protection Systems
Passive Systems
Passive fire protection systems
• Structural steel protection
• Rated barriers
Plant layout/separation
Drainage/containment
Flammable liquids (quantities, pressures,
types, etc.)
12
![Page 13: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Passive Fire Proofing
Documented design basis
Defined hazard areas
Extent of coverage (vertical and horizontal)
Design basis exposure conditions
Required hourly ratings
Documented maintenance records
Manufacturer’s recommended practice
Management of Change 13
![Page 14: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Case Study
Small specialty refinery
First plant inspection by outside auditor
Plant audit identified variety of safety
issues
Most notable being deficient structural
steel protection
14
![Page 15: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Compromised Steel Protection
Damaged/deteriorated fireproofing
Areas of missing/removed fireproofing
Incomplete installation
Unprotected secondary members and
supports
No documentation to support any specific
fire scenario or exposure duration
15
![Page 16: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Remediation Steps
Site visit conducted to:
Document existing structural steel
protection conditions
Gather basic process details
Obtain site plans to identify hazards and
equipment location
Develop additional information required for
refinery audit/hazard scenario development
16
![Page 17: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Remediation Recommendations
Determine:
Type of fire exposure (hydrocarbon, jet fire)
Determine hourly fire-resistance ratings
required
Specify appropriate passive fire protection
material (s)
• Availability, cost, application requirements, etc.
Conduct refinery audit
17
![Page 18: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Fire Protection Analysis
Establish fire scenario envelope
API 2218 guidelines and any site specific
guidelines
Identify high fire-potential equipment by
semi-qualitative approach
Type and quantities of hazardous liquids
Establish fire scenario envelope
Horizontal and vertical
18
![Page 19: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Fire Protection Analysis
Identify structural steel members in fire
scenario envelope
Determine required fire-resistance rating
Identify candidate passive fire protection
materials – concrete, SFRM, epoxy
intumescents, etc.
Develop remediation plan
Include steel prep and application guidelines
19
![Page 20: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Fire Protection Analysis
Proposed remedial actions documented
Report submitted to Loss Prevention
Agency for approval
Upon acceptance, remedial actions
initiated and completed
Repairs documented
Establish regular I&M program
20
![Page 21: A Parker Hughes Assoc Maintaining PFP Systems in PetroChem Facilities.pdf](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051404/577ccf0d1a28ab9e788ec2b1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Summary
Audit intended to review existing
procedures, conditions, documentation
Noted deficiencies need to be addressed
Regular internal audits can identify issues
prior to formal audits
Remediation responses need to be specific
Documentation, Documentation,
Documentation 21