a comparative analysis of speed control of separately excited dc motors by conventional-2

Upload: iaeme-publication

Post on 03-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    1/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    229

    A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPEED CONTROL OF

    SEPARATELY EXCITED DC MOTORS BY CONVENTIONAL AND

    VARIOUS AI TECHNIQUE BASED CONTROLLERS

    Debirupa Hore*

    (M.Tech Power and Energy systems, B.E Electrical Engineering)

    *Assistant Professor Electrical Engineering Department

    KJ Educational Institutes KJCOEMR Pune Maharashtra India

    ABSTRACT

    This paper presents a comparison of speed control of a separately excited DC motor

    using different types of controllers. Conventional controllers are generally used to control the

    speed of the separately excited DC motors in various industrial applications. It is found to be

    simple and high effective if the load disturbances are small. But during high load or large

    variation of load the AI technique based controllers such as proves to be fast and reliable. To

    control the speed of the motor a step down chopper is also used. The control scheme of the

    motor was tested with convention PI controller following the Fuzzy controller and then

    ANFIS Based speed controller. All the responses were analyzed in MATLAB/SIMULINK

    environment. The simulation results show that the Artificial Intelligence based speed

    controllers gives good performance and high robustness in large load disturbances.

    I.INTRODUCTIONDevelopment of high performance motor drives is very essential for industrialapplications. A high performance motor drive system must have good dynamic speed

    command tracking and load regulating response. Depending on the application, some of them

    have fixed speed and some have variable speed. The variable speed drives, have various

    limitations such as poor efficiencies, lower speeds etc. With the advent of power electronics

    today we have variable drive systems which are not only smaller in size but also very

    efficient, highly reliable and meeting all the stringent demands of the various industries of

    modern era. DC motors provide excellent control of speed for acceleration and deceleration.

    The power supply of a DC motor connects directly to the field of the motor which allows for

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

    & TECHNOLOGY (IJEET)

    ISSN 0976 6545(Print)ISSN 0976 6553(Online)

    Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), pp. 229-244 IAEME:www.iaeme.com/ijeet.aspJournal Impact Factor (2013): 5.5028 (Calculated by GISI)

    www.jifactor.com

    IJEET

    I A E M E

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    2/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    230

    precise voltage control, and is necessary for speed and torque control applications. DC

    drives, because of their simplicity, ease of application, reliability and favorable cost

    have long been a backbone of industrial applications. DC drives are less complex as

    compared to AC drives system. DC drives are normally less expensive for low horsepowerratings. DC motors have a long tradition of being used as adjustable speed machines and a

    wide range of options have evolved for this purpose. Cooling blowers and inlet air flanges

    provide cooling air for a wide speed range at constant torque. DC regenerative drives are

    available for applications requiring continuous regeneration for overhauling loads. AC drives

    with this capability would be more complex and expensive. Properly applied brush and

    maintenance of commutator is minimal. DC motors can provide high starting torques which

    is required for traction drives. They are also used for mobile equipment such as golf carts,

    quarry and mining applications. DC motors are conveniently portable and well fit to

    special applications, like industrial equipments and machineries that are not easily run

    from remote power sources.

    With the advent of thyristors and thyristor power converters the variable voltage to

    the dc motor is obtained from static power converters. Phase controlled rectifiers providevariable dc voltage from constant voltage, constant frequency mains. The static apparatus is

    very efficient, compact and has a very good dynamic behavior. It is very easy to provide a

    four quadrant drive with slight modifications in the converter. A dc chopper can be used to

    obtain a variable voltage from a constant dc voltage. The average value of the output voltage

    can be varied by varying the time ratio of the chopper.

    II.CHOPPERSA DC chopper is a static power electronic device that converts fixed dc input voltage

    to a variable dc output voltage. A Chopper may be considered as dc equivalent of an AC

    transformer since they behave in an identical manner. As chopper involves one stage

    conversion, these are more efficient. Choppers are now being used all over the world for

    rapid transit systems. These are also used in trolley cars, battery-operated vehicles, traction-

    motor control, and control of induction motors, marine hoists, forklift trucks and mine

    haulers. The future electric automobiles are likely to use choppers for their speed control and

    braking. Besides, the saving in power, the DC chopper offers greater efficiency, faster

    response, lower maintenance, small size, smooth control, regeneration facility and for many

    applications, lower cost, than motor-generator sets or gas tubes approaches.

    A. PRINCIPLE OF STEP-DOWN CHOPPER (BUCK-CONVERTER) OR CLASS ACHOPPER

    A chopper is a high speed ON or OFF semiconductor switch which is consists of

    power semiconductor devices, input dc power supply, elements (R, L, C, etc.) and outputload. The average output voltage across the load is controlled by varying on-period and off-

    period (or duty cycle) of the switch In fig.1 when chopper CH1 is ON, V 0 = V and current i0flows in the arrow direction shown. When CH1 IS OFF, V0 = 0 but i0 in the load continues

    flowing in the same direction through freewheeling diode FD. Hence average values of both

    load voltage and current, i.e. V and I0 are always positive as shown by the hatched area in thefirst quadrant ofV-I plane in fig.1 (b). The power flow in type-A chopper is always fromsource to load. This chopper is also called step-down chopper as average output voltage V0 is

    always less than the input dc voltage.

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    3/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    231

    Fig. 1(a) Class A Chopper Circuit

    Fig. 1(b): Voltage and Current Directions

    The variations in on and off periods of the switch provides an output voltage with an

    adjustable average value.

    Fig 1(c): Voltage Waveforms

    Average voltage, V = (T / (T +T))* V= (T /T)* V=V (1)T = on-timeT = off-time

    T = T + T= chopping periodThus the voltage can be controlled by varying duty cycle.

    V = f*T *V (2)f = 1/T = chopping frequency

    III. MODELLING OF SEPARATELY EXCITED DC MOTORA separately excited dc motor is very versatile as a variable speed motor. Its speed can be

    varied by varying the applied voltage to the armature or field current. The speed control using thevariation of armature voltage can be used for constant torque application in the speed range from

    zero to rated speed (base speed). Speeds above base speed are obtained by means of fieldweakening, the armature voltage being kept at the rated value. The speed control in this case is at

    constant power. In both cases the speed control is smooth and step-less

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    4/16

    International Journal of Elect

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(O

    Fig 2

    Fig 2(b): Co

    A. OPERATION OF SEPARATWhen a separately excite

    current of ia flows in the circuit, th

    torque at a particular speed. Thewinding is supplied separately. A

    current. In general ia is much less t

    B.FIELD AND ARMATURE E

    Instantaneous field current:

    difVf= Rfif+ Lf dtWhere, Rf and Lf are the field resisInstantaneous armature current:

    diaVa = Raia+La + EgdtWhere, Ra and La are the arm

    The motor back emf, which is also

    Eg = KvifKv is the motor voltage constant

    ical Engineering and Technology (IJEET),

    line) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013),

    232

    (a): Separately Excited DC motor

    plete layout for DC motor speed control

    ELY EXCITED DC MOTOR

    dc motor is excited by a field current of if ane motor develops a back EMF and a torque to ba

    ield current if is independent of the armature cuny change in the armature current has no effecan if.

    QUATIONS

    (3)

    tor and inductor, respectively.

    (4)

    ture resistor and inductance respectively.

    known as speed voltage, is expressed as:

    (5)

    (in V/A-rad/sec and is the motor speed (in ra

    SSN 0976

    IAEME

    d an armaturelance the load

    rrent ia.. Eacht on the field

    /sec).

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    5/16

    International Journal of Elect

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(O

    C.BASIC TORQUE EQUATIO

    The torque developed by the motor i

    Td = Kt ifiawhere, (Kt=Kv) is the torque consta

    For normal operation, the developedinertia, i.e.

    dTd = J + B + TLdtWhere, B: viscous friction constant,

    : load torque (N.m)

    J: inertia of the motor (kg.m

    D. STEADY-STATE TORQUEThe motor speed can be easily deri

    = (Va - IaRa)/KvIfIf Ra is a small value (which is usu

    = Va /KvIfThat is if the field current is kept cThe developed torque is:

    Td = KtIfIa= B+ TLThe required power is:

    Pd= TdE. TORQUE AND SPEED CON

    An important fact can be

    current, or flux (If) the torque demotor speed can be controlled by c

    F. VARIABLE SPEED OPERA

    Fig. 3(a): Torque Vs

    ical Engineering and Technology (IJEET),

    line) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013),

    233

    s:

    (6)

    t.(in V/A-rad/s)

    torque must be equal to the load torque plus the fric

    (7)

    (N.m/rad/s)

    2)

    ND SPEED

    ed:

    (8)

    al), or when the motor is lightly loaded, i.e. Ia is sm

    (9)

    nstant, the motor speed depends only on the supply

    (10)

    (11)

    ROL

    educed for steady-state operation of DC motor. F

    mand can be satisfied by varying the armature

    ntrolling Va (voltage control) or controlling Vf(fieldION

    peed Characteristic for Different Armature Voltage

    SSN 0976

    IAEME

    tion and

    all,

    voltage.

    r a fixed field

    current Ia. Thecontrol).

    s

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    6/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    234

    Family of steady state torque speed curves for a range of armature voltage can be drawn as above. Thespeed of DC motor can simply be set by applying the correct voltage. The speed variation from no

    load to full load (rated) can be quite small. It depends on the armature resistance.

    G. BASE SPEED AND FIELD-WEAKENING

    Fig. 3(b): Torque Vs Speed and Power Vs Speed Characteristic of Separately Excited DC Motor

    The motor speed can be varied by-

    (a) Controlling the armature voltage V, known as voltage control;(b) Controlling the field current I, known as field control; and(c) Torque demand, which corresponds to an armature current I, for a fixed field current I.The speed corresponds to the rated armature voltage, rated field current and rated armature currentwhich is known as the rated (or base) speed. In practice, for a speed less than the base speed, the

    armature current and field currents are maintained constant to meet the torque demand, and the

    armature voltage V is varied to control the speed. For speed higher than the base speed, the armaturevoltage is maintained at the rated value and the field current is varied to control the speed. However,

    the power developed by the motor (power = torque * speed) remains constant.Base speed (W)-The speed which correspond to the rated V , rated I and rated I .Constant torque region (W< W)-Ia and If are maintained constant to met torque demand. V is varied to control the speed as powerincreases with speed.

    Constant power region (W> W)-V is maintained at the rated value and If is reduced to increase speed. However the powerdeveloped by the motor (= torque x speed) remains constant. This phenomenon is known as Fieldweakening.

    Fig 3(c): Typical Operating Regions of Separately Excited DC Machines

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    7/16

    International Journal of Elect

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(O

    IV. DESIGN OF CONTROL

    Three types of controllers wer

    involves the design of three type1. Conventional PI Controll

    2. Fuzzy Controller

    3. ANFIS Controller

    A. DESIGN OF PI CONTR

    1.DESIGN CURRENT CON

    Fig4: Block

    KtKp(1+Tis)*( RaIa Tis(1+sTa)=

    Iaref KtKp(1+Tis)*(Ra)Tis(1+sTa)Here, (Current Controller Parsuch that it cancels the largest ti

    of the system in 7.2.and, the res

    Ti=Ta

    Now, putting the value in equati

    Ia KtKp/RasTa=Iaref K1KtKp/RaTas(1+T1s)

    KtKp

    Let Ko =RaTa

    ical Engineering and Technology (IJEET),

    line) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013),

    235

    ER

    used and the result was analyzed. Design

    s of controllerer

    LLER

    TROLLER

    diagram for design of Current Controller

    )(12)

    K11+T1s

    meter) can be varied as when required. shome constant in the transfer function in order to

    onse will be much faster. Assuming

    n (12) we have

    (13)

    SSN 0976

    IAEME

    of Controller

    ld be chosenreduce order

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    8/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    236

    So,

    = I=/

    ( )

    I= ( ) (14)Therefore, the characteristic equation of the above equation is given as

    sT + s + KK =0s +

    +

    =0

    s + 2 + =0; ==1/(2T )=

    For a second order system value of =0.707 to have a proper response.

    0.707=

    KK =1/2T

    = (15)

    K = (16)From Eq.14 we have

    I= ( )

    )

    =( )/

    (17)

    The zero in the above equation may result in an overshoot. Therefore, we will use a time lag

    filter to cancel its effect. The current loop time constant is much higher than filter time

    constant. For a small delay we can write

    (1 + Ts)I =

    (18)

    I= (19)Neglecting s term we have

    I=

    (20)

    This equation is used as a response for the speed controller.

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    9/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    237

    2. DESIGN OF SPEED CONTROLLER

    Fig5: Block diagram for design of Speed Controller

    (s)/(s)(ref)=(Kn/K2)(Ra/KmTmTn)(1+TnS/(1+2T2S)S )/1+(KnRa/K2KmTmTn)(1+TnS/(1+2T2S)S)(K1/(1+T1S)) (21)Here, we have the option to Tn such that it cancels the largest time constant of the transfer function

    So, Tn=2T2Hence, equation 21 will be written as:

    (s)/(s)(ref. ) = (KnRa/K2KmTmTn)(1 + T1S)/K2KmTnS2(1 + T1S) + KnRaK1 (22)Ideally, (s) =1/S (S+s+)

    The damping constant is zero in above transfer function because of absence of S term, which results inoscillatory and unstable system. To optimize this we must get transfer function whose gain is close tounity

    Then using Modulus og Hugging method and deducing the above equation we finally get

    ( )( )/ ( )( ) = 1/( 1 + 4 1 + 8 2 1 + 8 3 1) (23)3. DESIGN OF FUZZY CONTROLLER

    The fuzzy controller used in this scheme is a Speed Controller. The Conventional Speed PI

    Controller is replaced by a Fuzzy Logic Based speed Controller for providing more reliable controlleroutputs for the Speed control of The Induction Motor. The main objective of the fuzzy controller is that

    the actual speed response of the induction motor must track the reference speed response The design ofa Fuzzy logic system includes the design of a rule base, the design of the member-ship functions

    determination of the Linguistic values. Here, the inputs of fuzzy controllers are the error in speed andthe rate of change of this error at any time interval. The output of the fuzzy controller is the ActivePower. Here, five fuzzy sets (NB, N, Z, P, and PB) are adopted for each input and output variables.

    The Character NB, N Z, P, PB represents Negative big, Negative, Zero, Positive, Positive Big. The

    membership functions of the two input variables and the one output variable has normalized universeof discourse over the interval [- 1, 1].For the implementation of FLC, firstly, the universe of discourse

    of input and output variables of FLC are determined. In practice, each universe is restricted to an

    interval that is related to the maximal and minimal possible values of the respective variables. That isto the operating range of the variable. The universe of discourse of the input and output variables of the

    Mamdani type (PI like) FLC can be determined as-

    The universe of the error is defined by the maximal and minimal values of the variables. It {emin,emax] is the interval where:

    = =

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    10/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    238

    Analogously the change in error and the change of the output have operating ranges between

    [ , ] and [ , ].Where,

    `

    =

    = = = The operating ranges are defined with respect to the external values of the relevant variables. They

    can be further adjusted by taking into account the dynamics of the controlled systems and the

    sampling intervals.For simplification and unification of the design of the FLC and its computer implementation,

    however it is more convenient to operate with normalizes universe of discourse of the input andoutput variables of the FLC. The normalized universes are well defined domains; the fuzzy values

    of input and output variables are fuzzy subsets of these domains. In general, the normalized

    universes can be identical to the real operating ranges of the variables, but in most applications

    they coincide with the closed interval [-1 1].Otherwise ,scaling of both input and output variablesare done in order to bring the values within prescribed limit.The Rule Table is formulated based on which the Fuzzy Controller is designed.

    Table:1 Rule base for speed controller

    4. DESIGN OF ANFIS CONTROLLERSteps Involved in the making of the ANFIS Controller

    Step1: Get the Error and Change in Error values from the previous model and save it in workspaceand finally define these values in a matrix in the M-file of Matlab.

    Step2: Run the matrix file.

    Step3: Open the ANFIS editor.Step4: Load data from workspace in the ANFIS editor.

    Step5:Generate FIS using Grid Partition. Here, the number of Member Functions and type of

    Member Functions are taken.Step6: Train the data using training FIS. Here the Error tolerance and epochs are also given.

    Step7: The data is trained using Train FIS.Step8: Step2 to 7 are performed using Checking Data.

    Step9: The file is saved in both workspace and matlab-file by exporting it.Step10: The Simulink model for ANFIS is opened and the controller is named after the name of

    the file saved in Step9.

    The ANFIS Speed Controller is obtained using the above steps.

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    11/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    239

    V. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSThe graph responses of the Fuzzy and ANFIS controllers has been compared with the.

    conventional PI controller. With the implementation of AI techniques (Fuzzy & ANFIS), theresponse shows that there is much flexibly with the variation of load found as compared to

    conventional model. In all the responses it has been found that the actual speed of the DC

    motor is as par with the reference speed of the motor. With Conventional PI speed controller

    the actual speed of the motor is tracking the reference speed of the motor up to the rated

    speed and even beyond it. But with Fuzzy & ANFIS Controller the actual speed of the motor

    is tracking the reference speed of the motor upto the rated speed and when the motor is

    overloaded the responses falls and error goes on increasing concluding that the motors fails to

    start or the motor stops. Thus the AI technique based controllers provides much better and

    precise control of the DC motor.

    FIG 6:-Block Representation of Motor Model with Fuzzy & PI Controller

    Fig 7:-Block Representation of Motor Model with ANFIS & PI Controller

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    12/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    240

    Appendix

    Table:2

    I. Performance of DC motor using PI speed ControllerIt is observed from the responses that the actual speed of the DC motor tracks the reference

    speed of the motor up to the rated speed of the motor (55rpm). Beyond the rated speed the PIcontroller has limitations in controlling the speed of the dc motor.

    Fig 8:Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Step Source as Input Using PIController

    Fig 9: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Ramp Source as Input Using

    PI Controller

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Reference Speed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Actual Speed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Error Speed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Reference Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Actual Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    Error Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    13/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    241

    II.Performance of DC motor using Fuzzy speed ControllerA. With motor running up to rated speed

    Fig 9: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Step Source as Input with

    Rated Load Using Fuzzy Controller

    Fig10: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Ramp Source as Input with

    Rated Load Using Fuzzy Controller

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Reference Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    p

    e

    e

    d

    in

    rp

    m

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Actual Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    p

    e

    e

    d

    in

    rp

    m

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    ErrorSpeed

    TimeinSec

    S

    p

    e

    e

    d

    in

    rp

    m

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Reference Speed

    Time inSec

    S

    p

    e

    e

    d

    in

    rp

    m

    0 0.5 1 1. 5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    ActualSpeed

    TimeinSec

    S

    p

    e

    e

    d

    in

    rp

    m

    0 0.5 1 1. 5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    Error Speed

    Time inSec

    S

    p

    e

    e

    d

    in

    rp

    m

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    14/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    242

    B.With motor running at overloaded condition

    Fig 11: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Step Source as Input with

    Over Loading Condition Using Fuzzy Controller

    Fig 12: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Ramp Source as Input with

    Over Loading Condition

    III. Performance of DC motor using ANFIS based speed ControllerA. With motor running up to rated speed

    Fig 13: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Step Source as Input with

    Rated Load Using ANFIS Controller

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Reference Speed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    -400

    -200

    0

    Actual Speed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    Error Speed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    50

    100

    Reference Speed

    TimeinSec

    Speed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-400

    -200

    0

    Actual Speed

    TimeinSec

    Speed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    100

    200

    300

    Error Speed

    TimeinSec

    Speed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    TimeinSec

    Speed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    TimeinSec

    Speed

    inr

    pm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    TimeinSec

    Speed

    inr

    pm

    Actual Speed

    Error Speed

    Reference Speed

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    15/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    243

    Fig 14: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Ramp Source as Input with

    Rated Load Using ANFIS Controller

    B.With motor running at overloaded condition

    Fig 15: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Step Source as Input with

    Over Loading Condition Using ANFIS Controller

    Fig 16: Speed Responses of a Separately Excited dc Motor with Ramp Source as Input with

    Over Loading Condition Using ANFIS Controller .

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Reference Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Actual Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Error Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Reference Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-60

    -40

    -20

    0

    Actual Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 50

    50

    100

    Error Speed

    TimeinSec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    0

    20

    40

    60

    Reference Speed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-200

    -100

    0

    Actual Speed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

    0

    100

    200

    ErrorSpeed

    Timein Sec

    S

    peed

    in

    rpm

  • 7/28/2019 A Comparative Analysis of Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motors by Conventional-2

    16/16

    International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (IJEET), ISSN 0976

    6545(Print), ISSN 0976 6553(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

    244

    VI.CONCLUSIONIn this paper the speed of a dc motor has been done using three different types of

    Controllers viz Speed PI controller, Fuzzy logic based controller and ANFIS based controller.The responses of the motor with three different types of controllers are simulated and studied

    and compared with step and ramp responses. With varying load responses it is observed that

    the AI technique based controllers gives a flexible and precise control of speed both on

    normal loaded and overloaded condition as compared to the conventional PI controller.

    REFERENCES

    [1].Waleed I. Hameed1 and Khearia A. Mohamad2 Speed control of separately excited dc

    motor using fuzzy neural model reference controller International Journal of Instrumentation

    and Control Systems (IJICS) Vol.2, No.4, October 2012 PP 27-39.

    [2] Dr.P.S Bimbhra Power Electronics,Khanna Publishers.

    [3]Ronald R Yager, Dimitar P Filev, Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control WileyInterscience Publications.

    [4]Jun Yan, Michael Ryan, James Power Using Fuzzy

    Logic towards Intelligent systems

    [5]Singari.v.s.r Pavankumar, Sande.krishnaveni, Y.B.Venugopal, Y.S.Kishore Babu, A

    Neuro- Fuzzy Based Speed Control of Separately Excited DC Motor, IEEE Transactions on

    Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, pp. 93-98, 2010.

    [6] Basma A. Omar, Amira Y. Haikal, Fayz F. Areed, An Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Speed

    Controller for a Separately excited DC Motor, International Journal of Computer

    Applications, pp. 29-37, Vol. 39 No.9, February 2012.

    [7] Vandana Jha, Dr. Pankaj Rai and Dibya Bharti, Modelling and Analysis of Dc-Dc

    Converter Using Simulink for Dc Motor Control, International Journal of Electrical

    Engineering & Technology (IJEET), Volume 3, Issue 2, 2012, pp. 58 - 68, ISSN Print : 0976-6545, ISSN Online: 0976-6553.

    [8] M.Gowrisankar and Dr. A. Nirmalkumar, Implementation & Simulation of Fuzzy Logic

    Controllers for the Speed Control of Induction Motor and Performance Evaluation of Certain

    Membership Functions, International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology

    (IJEET), Volume 2, Issue 1, 2011, pp. 25 - 35, ISSN Print : 0976-6545, ISSN Online: 0976-

    6553.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Debirupa Hore was born in Guwahati Assam India on April 19th

    1983.She

    received her B.E Degree in Electrical Engineering from Assam EngineeringCollege Guwahati in 2006 and M.Tech in Energy and Power Systems in 2010

    from NIT Silchar. She worked in GIMT Guwahati for 5 years as Assistant

    Professor. Currently she is working as an Assistant Professor in Electrical

    Engineering Department in KJ Educational Institutes, KJCOEMR, Pune

    (Maharashtra).Her research areas of interest includes Power Systems, AI

    Techniques, Power Electronics and Drives etc.