a cognitive perpective on how people learn: implications for teaching

100
A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University

Upload: clovis

Post on 11-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching. Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University. GOALS. To explore theories of cognitive psychology related to learning, transfer and problem-solving To examine implications of these theories for teaching. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

A Cognitive Perpective on How People

Learn: Implications for Teaching

Geoff Norman, Ph.D.

McMaster University

Page 2: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

GOALS To explore theories of cognitive

psychology related to learning, transfer and problem-solving

To examine implications of these theories for teaching

Page 3: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

The Cognitive Perspective

“The essence of intelligence is less a matter of reasoning and more a matter of knowing a lot about the world”

H.A.Simon, 1989

thinking

Page 4: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Teaching MUTES Memory and Understanding Transfer Exercises Skills

Page 5: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Some assertions about learning and recall Learning and remembering results from

assimilation of new knowledge into existing knowledge, and meaning is critical to learning

Transfer (applying old knowledge to new situations) doesn’t happen easily

Structured, planned, practice with multiple examples is key to transfer

Experience is critical in everyday and expert performance

General skills don’t exist – it’s all imbedded in knowledge

Page 6: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Learning and Understanding Learning is strongly influenced by the

meaning . If we can understand what we are learning

in terms of pre-existing knowledge, better learning and retention results

Meaning is a consequence of the interaction between learner and ‘to be learned’

Page 7: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

The Jeopardy Challenge (Picture removed) of two Jeopardy

contestants

Page 8: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Watson (Picture removed) of Watson the

computer

Page 9: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Watson definition available at Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watson_(computer)#Hardware

Watson can process 500 gigabytes, the equivalent of a million books, per second.

Watson has much faster reaction time.

The humans were notified by a light, which took them tenths of a second to perceive. Watson could activate the buzzer within about 8 millisecond.

Page 10: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

But when he’s wrong he’s spectacularly wrong….

Trebeck: This U.S. city has two airports named after

a World War 2 pilot and a WW2 battle.

Watson What is Toronto?

(it’s Chicago – Midway and O’Hare)

Page 11: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

So Watson, reading a million books a second, and button-pushing in 8 msec., can beat Ken….just.

How can Ken be so gosh-darn good?

Page 12: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Me and my iBook

CPU speed 1/5 sec. 1/2000,000,000 sec.

RAM 3 bytes 4,000,000,000 bytes

ROM ?inf 250 Gb

Page 13: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

We should be less impressed that computers can do about as well as humans than that humans can do as well as computers, given the large architectural disadvantages they suffer from.

Paul Johnson , Medinfo 1977

Page 14: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

The Secret Ingredient

………meaning….

Page 15: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time. And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out brief candle! Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot: Full of sound and furySignifying nothing

W. Shakespeare, Macbeth, V, v

Page 16: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Sound is walking, stage struts and a tale is heard. No more a poor candle, frets life. A brief idiot, fury and shadow, is in a dusty fool.

Page 17: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

drswa gtrus hdrkl opono rluta

sflta dnaro lensa bfdoa radit

sogfv sonap vfhoe qpofs cpoas

Page 18: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Γικνξ δΦγε βγ ηγδφπιψ ιαβθξπ

Page 19: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Meaning is imposed by the learner and involves an interaction between existing knowledge and new information

Page 20: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

The procedure is quite simple. First you arrange things into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities, this is the next step. It is better to do too few things at once than too many. At first it seems complicated, but soon it just becomes a fact of life. After it’s over, you arrange the materials in groups again, then put them in the right place.

Page 21: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Washing Clothes The procedure is quite simple. First you arrange things into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities, this is the next step. It is better to do too few things at once than too many. At first it seems complicated, but soon it just becomes a fact of life. After it’s over, you arrange the materials in groups again, then put them in the right place.

Page 22: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Evidence of the Role of Meaning Chess

Nephrology

Page 23: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

How do you get to be a chess master?

Is it:- learning the rules?

- learning to think of more moves and deeper strategy? (process)

- learning to think better moves? (knowledge)

Page 24: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Recall of Chess Positions 4 levels of chess player

mid-game positions

5-7 sec exposure

Page 25: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Recall after 5 sec. Exposure(real positions)

Page 26: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Recall after 5 sec. exposure

Page 27: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

It’s not just Visual Patterns Lab data, nephrology problems

5 research associates 6 students 5 experts

Page 28: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Recall of Nephrology Data

Page 29: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Summary Remembering for meaningful material is

enhanced because there are more links or pathways to the memory trace

Page 30: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Implications for Teachers

How can we, as teachers, help students impose meaning on what they’re learning?

Page 31: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Implications for Curriculum What are we doing now?

“Traditional” PBL

Does PBL enhance learning” MACRO -- no or maybe

MICRO: Active Learning Imbedding problem Everyday analogy

Page 32: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Effect of active, problem-oriented processing(Needham & Begg, 1991)

Intro psychology students, 5 classic problems

“Try to solve these difficult problems” ( 27% successful)

vs.

“Remember the problem and solution so you can solve some additional problems”

(21% successful)

Page 33: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Effect of Active Problem-solving

Needham & Begg, 1991

Page 34: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Imbedding Principle in Problem

(Ross & Kilbane, 1997)Practice and Test problems with: SEQUENTIAL

Principle explanation, then problem example

IMBEDDED Principle imbedded in problem, explanation as part of problem

“Reversal” = using original principle incorrectly

Page 35: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Reversal Errors

Page 36: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Analogy in Learning Science(Donnelly & McDaniel, 1993)

48 students, 12 concepts

Literal description of concept vs. description + analogy in familiar domain (e.g. pulsar star and lighthouse)

24 MCQs; 4/concept, 12 basic +12 inference

Page 37: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching
Page 38: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

An application in Medical Education

Page 39: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Pressure and Tension on a Membrane

P

T

r

T = P * rLaw of Laplace

Page 40: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

The “weight and string” problem

W

Ta

T = W / 2 sin(a)

Page 41: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

T T

W W

T = W / 2 sin(alpha)

a

Page 42: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

T

T

t

t

Page 43: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Dual Explanations (Krebs, Dore, Norman, 2006) Three “Laws”

Laplace , Right Heart Strain, Starling

Intervention Mechanical + Biological Active Comparison vs. Biological explanation only

Test 9 diagnostic cases Sample -- undergrad psych students

Page 44: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Percent Correct

Page 45: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Implications for Teaching/ Curriculum Arrange learning to integrate with prior

knowledge Active learning Problem – based learning Imbed principle in problem Everyday analogy

Sequencing of concepts

Page 46: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Transfer

using old knowledge to solve new problems

Page 47: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

As teachers, we act as if all the knowledge we impart to students will be available to them to solve problems in the future

Page 48: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

As teachers, we act as if all the knowledge we impart to students will be available to them to solve problems in the future

Unfortunately….. it won’t

Page 49: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Views of Transfer

General Transfer (1900-1915….)

Subjects like Latin, algebra teach general “habits of mind”

(disproved by Thorndike, 1913)

Specific transfer (Behaviorism,1910--> Now)

Learned concepts can only be transferred if new behavior = old behavior

(disproved by Judd, 1908, Wertheimer, 1959, Pressley 1990)

Intermediate / hybrid transfer

Learned concepts can be applied (with difficulty) to new, dissimilar problem situations

Page 50: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

A general wishes to capture a fortress located in the centre of a country. There are many roads radiating from the fortress. All have been mined so that, while small groups of men can pass over the roads safely, a large force will detonate the mines. A full-scale direct attack is therefore impossible. The general’s solution is to divide the army into small groups, send each down a different road, and have the groups converge simultaneously on the fortress.

Page 51: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

You are a doctor faced with a patient who has a malignant tumour in his stomach. It is impossible to operate on the tumour. X-rays can be used to destroy the tumour. If sufficient rays reach the tumour all at once, the cancer cells will be killed, but surrounding tissue will be damaged as well. How can you arrange the procedure to destroy the tumour cells without severely damaging the surrounding tissue. Gick & Holyoak, 1980

Page 52: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Transfer and Context Specificity

The initial solution (multiple simultaneous paths) was learned in, and stored with the problem context (fortress and army).

To solve the new problem, must recognize that the old problem was analogous to the new, despite different contexts

To recognize analogy, we must recognize similarity in deep structure

this rarely happens…..

Page 53: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Why not just teach them the principle? Teach the principle, then give them an

example of the principle

Page 54: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

“…during early learning, the principle is only understood in terms of the earlier example… the principle and example are bound together. Even if learners are given the principle or formula, they would use the details of the earlier problem in figuring out how to apply that principle to the current problem”

Brian Ross

Page 55: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Effective Use of Practice Examples

Multiple examples vs. “Principle + Example”

Active Compare and Contrast vs. Separate (Gentner, 2003, Holyoak,1989)

Page 56: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Multiple Examples vs. Principle + Example MBA Students , negotiation problem

Factor 1 Two cases, implicit principle vs.Principle +

Case

Factor 2 Read case and principle (on successive

pages) vs. Compare Case and Principle

Loewenstein& Gentner, 2003

Page 57: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Effect of Examples and Comparisons

Gentner, 2003

Page 58: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Implications for Teaching

Transfer can be facilitated by use of examples during initial learning

multiple examples > principle + example compare and contrast Active search for deep structure

Page 59: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Transfer, examples and practice Critical to learning, transfer is the opportunity

to see the concept arise in multiple contexts This can only arise with multiple practical

exercises

What can we do to enhance the value of practice?

Page 60: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Strategies to Optimize Practice

Mixed vs. Blocked Practice (Hatala, 2002)

Distributed vs. Blocked Practice(Schmidt &Bjork,1992)

Page 61: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

What do you need to do stats?

An Observation:

With the availability of sophisticated statistical software, the central issue facing the statistics student is “ What test do I use?”

To learn this, students have to see data sets, think of possible strategies, and get feedback

Page 62: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

What do you get in stats courses? Instructional time occupied by equation

proving, formula remembering

Practice at end of chapter of the form: “Do a t test on these data”

Page 63: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

So when do you do a t test?

At the end of the t test chapter

Page 64: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

The solution

Mixed practice

Page 65: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Mixed vs. Blocked Practice

In the face of ambiguous features (which are subject to reinterpretation), and multiple categories, students must learn the features which discriminate one category from another, not those which support a particular category

Page 66: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Mixed vs. Blocked PracticeHatala, 2000

ECG Diagnosis -- 3 categories 6 examples / category

Blocked

Review, then 6 examples/category

Mixed

Review, 2/category, 12 (4 x 3) practice

TEST 6 new ECGs

Page 67: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Accuracy -- %

Page 68: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Timing and Sequence of Learning

Would you rather learn to skate (type, play violin, speak Spanish):

1 hour/day, biweekly, for 60 weeks = 30 1 hour / day for 3 days/wk for 10 wks = 30 3 hours/day, 1 day/week, 10 weeks = 30 6 hours/day, 5 days, 1 week = 30

Page 69: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Massed vs. Distributed Practice

Massed All learning takes place at one time

Distributed Learning takes place over multiple

occasions

Page 70: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Massed vs. Distributed

(Raman, McLaughlin, 2010)

20 GI residents

Nutrition course

- 4 hr, one 1/2 day vs. 1 hr. 4 1/2 day

Multiple choice test, 0, + 1 wk., + 3 mo.

Page 71: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching
Page 72: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Implications for Teaching Practice is critical for learning and transfer

to impose meaning on concepts to overcome “context specificity” to enhance transfer

Some practice works better than others Mixed >> blocked Distributed >> Blocked

Page 73: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Exercises, Experience and Expertise

The critical role of deliberate practice in acquisition of expertise

Is practice just a matter of learning to apply the rules? remember the chess master!!!!

Page 74: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

How long does it take to learn chess?

To learn the rules ---- 10 hr.?

To become an expert ---10,000 hr. / 10 yr.

Experts know about 50,000 strategies (Ericsson, 2004)

Page 75: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Age and Skilled Chess Performance

(pic removed) FIDE 1995 ratings graph from Ericsson and Charness, 1998

Page 76: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

How long does it take to learn to play:

- Violin

- Field Hockey

Page 77: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

(Pic of Graph removed) Estimated Accumulated Practice Hours compared with Age of Musicians in Years

(Pic of Graph removed) Accumulated Practice compared with Years into Career and Chronological Age

Page 78: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Who do you choose? Dr. JS. finished residency last year and was

in top 5 on cardiology exam?

Dr. KT finished residency 10 years ago and was in top 1/3 on cardiology exam?

Page 79: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

What does the clinician gain from years of experience?

Years of experiences

Page 80: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

A challenging diagnostic task…..

Page 81: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

A much easier diagnostic task

Page 82: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

(Picture removed) Cat and Dog comparison sketches

Cat and Dog concepts combined Picture of Dalmatian dog with black

spotted cats

Page 83: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Similarity and recognition of everyday objects When we recognize everyday objects,

the process is effortless, seemingly unconscious.

We are not aware that we are eliciting or weighting individual features

The process appears to occur all at once (Gestalt)

Page 84: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Familiar Categories Rapid, effortless, accurate recognition

- despite massive within – category variation- despite no overt understanding of rules

Unfamiliar Categories Slow, effortful, inaccurate recognition

Despite NO within – category variation Despite an explicit and simple additive rule

Page 85: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Exemplar Theory - Medin, Brooks Categories consist of a collection of prior

instances identification of category membership based on

availability of similar instances Similarity is “non-analytic” (not conscious), hence

can result from objectively irrelevant features Ratings of typicality, identification of features, etc.

done “on the fly” at retrieval

Page 86: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Effect of Similarity (Allen, Brooks, Norman, 1992)

24 medical students, 6 conditions

Learn Rules Practice rules

Train Set A Train Set B(6 x 4) x 5 (6 x 4) x 5

Test (9 / 30)

Page 87: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

(Picture removed) different pictures of various areas of same skin condition

Picture of most commonly diagnosed area on the arm

Page 88: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Accuracy by Bias Condition

Page 89: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Hatala et al, ECG Interpretation Medical students/ Fam Med residents PRACTICE (4/4 + 7 filler)

middle aged banker with chest pain

OR elderly woman with chest pain

Anterior M I

TEST ( 4 critical + 3 filler) Middle aged banker

Left Bundle Branch Block

Page 90: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

RESULTSPercent of Diagnoses by Condition

Page 91: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

CONCLUSIONS - The Role of Examples

Categories and concepts are based on our specific experience with the world as well as application of rules

Page 92: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Implications for Teaching Practice with examples is critical in

ambiguous domains

Practice results in a collection of exemplars as a problem-solving resource

Page 93: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

What happened to Skills? Any measure of “problem-solving”,

“reasoning”, “critical thinking”, “clinical judgment”, etc. correlates across problems at about 0.1-- 0.3.

Process measures of the above show no gradient with expertise

Page 94: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Recurring ThemesLearning

Human learning and remembering is critically sensitive to the meaning the learner imposes on the “to be learned”

Page 95: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Recurring Themes Transfer of concepts to new, dissimilar

problem situations does not occur effortlessly or frequently

Enhanced by active learning, search for principles, multiple practice examples

Impeded by learning for memory, passive learning, single example

Page 96: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Recurring Themes

Formal conceptual knowledge is insufficient for expertise

Experience provides an array of prior examples to draw from and reduce memory load

Page 97: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Recurring ThemesKinds of Knowledge

Expertise is more a matter of having the right knowledge (both formal and experiential) and being able to mobilize it, than of any general skills

Page 98: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Thinking depends on specific, context-bound skills and units of knowledge that have little application to other domains….. The case for generalizable, context-independent skills that can be trained in one context and transferred to other domains has proven to be more a case of wishful thinking than hard, empirical evidence.

Perkins & Salomon, 1989

Page 99: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

Conclusion

“The problem-solving difficulties of novices can be attributed largely to the inadequacies of their knowledge base and not to limitations in their problem-solving capabilities”

R. Glaser, 1984

We have discussed a number of strategies to improve the knowledge base

Page 100: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching

The End

Thanks