a century of war 9107

3
 Gulf Research Center page 1 of 3 Title: A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order Author: William Engdahl Publisher: London: Pluto Press, 2004 Reviewed by: Dr. Klejda Mulaj Senior Researcher Gulf Research Center n the words of its author, this book ‘seeks to shed light on some lesser known aspects of our history, in an effort to encourage ordinary citizens to reflect on longer-term consequences of what our governments do with our mandate.’ The book suggests that the US agenda in Iraq was about oil, but not about oil in the simple sense many believed. This war (2003) was not an issue of corporate greed but about geopolitical power above all. Engdahl’s book seeks to provide an analysis of power politics centred on the politics of oil. The last century was the American Century which rested on two pillars: the uncontested roles of US military power, and of the dollar as world reserve currency. The power of the dollar and the power of the US military had been uniquely intertwined with one commodity: petroleum. As Henry Kissinger once said: ‘Control energy and you control the nations.’ The British geopolitical domination, on the other hand, rested on three pillars: control of the seas, domination of international banks, and domination of the world’s raw materials. In the beginning of the last quarter of the nineteenth century, Britain embarked on a sophisticated strategy for maintaining its dominant world role through what came to be called ‘informal empire’. The notion of special economic relationships with ‘client states’, the concept of ‘spheres of influence’ and ‘balance-of-power diplomacy,’ all emerged from the complex weave of British ‘informal empire’ towards the end of the last century. By the early 1870s, a deep economic depression had begun in Britain following a financial panic. The Great Depression of 1873 followed, and by the 1890s, the period of Britain’s easy leadership among the world’s industrial nations was clearly over. This set the stage for both the introduction of the geopolitics of petroleum in 1882 and how Britain was to maintain its naval supremacy. In September 1882, Britain’s Admiral Lord Fisher argued that Britain must convert its naval fleet from bulky coal-fired propulsion to oil, as a diesel motor issued no tell-tale smoke. It reached full power in a mere 30 minutes and peak power within five minutes, required very little men and time to provide oil fuel to a battleship and required one third the engine weight and one-quarter the daily tonnage of fuel when compared to a coal I

Upload: yasir-zoha

Post on 07-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Century of War 9107

8/4/2019 A Century of War 9107

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-century-of-war-9107 1/3

 

Gulf Research Center page 1 of 3

Title: A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics andthe New World Order Author: William Engdahl

Publisher: London: Pluto Press, 2004 

Reviewed by: Dr. Klejda Mulaj Senior Researcher

Gulf Research Center 

n the words of its author, this book ‘seeks to shed light on some lesser known aspects of our history, in

an effort to encourage ordinary citizens to reflect on longer-term consequences of what our governments

do with our mandate.’ The book suggests that the US agenda in Iraq was about oil, but not about oil in

the simple sense many believed. This war (2003) was not an issue of corporate greed but about geopolitical

power above all. Engdahl’s book seeks to provide an analysis of power politics centred on the politics of oil.

The last century was the American Century which rested on two pillars: the uncontested roles of US military

power, and of the dollar as world reserve currency. The power of the dollar and the power of the US military

had been uniquely intertwined with one commodity: petroleum. As Henry Kissinger once said: ‘Control energy

and you control the nations.’

The British geopolitical domination, on the other hand, rested on three pillars: control of the seas, domination

of international banks, and domination of the world’s raw materials. In the beginning of the last quarter of the

nineteenth century, Britain embarked on a sophisticated strategy for maintaining its dominant world role

through what came to be called ‘informal empire’. The notion of special economic relationships with ‘client

states’, the concept of ‘spheres of influence’ and ‘balance-of-power diplomacy,’ all emerged from the complex

weave of British ‘informal empire’ towards the end of the last century.

By the early 1870s, a deep economic depression had begun in Britain following a financial panic. The GreatDepression of 1873 followed, and by the 1890s, the period of Britain’s easy leadership among the world’s

industrial nations was clearly over. This set the stage for both the introduction of the geopolitics of petroleum in

1882 and how Britain was to maintain its naval supremacy.

In September 1882, Britain’s Admiral Lord Fisher argued that Britain must convert its naval fleet from bulky

coal-fired propulsion to oil, as a diesel motor issued no tell-tale smoke. It reached full power in a mere 30

minutes and peak power within five minutes, required very little men and time to provide oil fuel to a battleshipand required one third the engine weight and one-quarter the daily tonnage of fuel when compared to a coal

I

Page 2: A Century of War 9107

8/4/2019 A Century of War 9107

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-century-of-war-9107 2/3

Book Review

Gulf Research Center page 2 of 3

fired battleship. In 1911, Fisher was succeeded by Winston Churchill who began a campaign for an oil-fired

navy. British presence in the Persian Gulf was essential to its national interest and majority share ownership of 

Anglo-Persian Oil (today British Petroleum) was bought up by Britain. Oil became the core of British strategic

interest.

During the Great War, petroleum had emerged as the recognised key to success of a revolution in military

strategy. In the age of mobile tank warfare and swifter naval warfare, abundant and secure supplies of the newfuel were becoming increasingly essential.

Britain had gained the invaluable military assistance of Arab forces under Sherif Husain ibn Ali, the Hashemiteemir of Mecca, and guardian of the Muslim holy places of Mecca and Medina. Britain had assured the Arab

forces that the reward for their help in defeating the Turks would be British assurance of full post-war Arab

sovereignty and independence. Engdahl, however, argues that Britain quickly betrayed her promises to secure

for herself the vast oil and political riches of the Arab Middle East, and established its military supremacy over

the French area of the Middle East as well. By 1920, Britain had succeeded in gaining firm control over all of southern Africa, including former German South West Africa, as well as the vast newly discovered petroleum

wealth of the former Ottoman Empire, by means of her military presence, conflicting promises, and the

establishment of a British protectorate over Palestine as a new Jewish homeland.

By the early 1920s, the British government controlled a formidable arsenal of apparently private companies

which served the direct interest of Britain to dominate and control all the identified major regions believed to

contain significant petroleum deposits. Although in 1912 Britain commanded no more than 12 per cent of 

world oil production through British companies, by 1925 she controlled the major part of the world’s future

supplies of petroleum.

Following the Second World War, however, Britain was utterly dependent on the US with the latter gaining the

upper hand in world politics. Bretton Woods created a gold exchange system whereby each member nation’s

currency was pegged to the US dollar which had emerged from the ravages of the war as the world’s strongest

currency, backed by what was unquestionably the world’s strongest economy. In 1947, the US adopted the

European Recovery Program (the Marshall Plan). Recipient countries used 10 percent of all Marshall Plan aid

to purchase oil, which was supplied by American oil companies. By 1947, half of all western Europe’s oil wasbeing supplied by five American companies. Oil had then become the most important commodity to fuel the

economy.

The author suggests that by early 1971 the dominant US policy was to control, not develop, economies

throughout the world. President Nixon announced formal suspension of dollar convertibility into gold,

effectively putting the world fully onto a dollar standard with no gold backing. No longer could foreign holders

of US dollars redeem their money for gold reserves. In order to tilt the balance of power back to the advantage

of Anglo-American financial interests and the dollar, a colossal assault against industrial growth in the world

was launched. This was done through control of the world’s oil flows. A global oil embargo was triggered toforce a dramatic increase in world oil prices which, in turn, brought with it an equally dramatic increase in

world demand for US dollars, the currency used to pay for that oil.

By October 1973, the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had raised their price by a

staggering 70 per cent. The increase in oil price had an enormous benefit for the major New York and London

banks, and British and American oil multinationals.

In June 1978, the European Economic Community took steps to create the first phase of a European currency

zone. In 1979, the European Monetary System (EMS) became operational and stabilized European currencies,

thereby worrying certain circles in London and Washington as it could threaten the existing hegemony of the

‘petrodollar monetary system’. France and Germany, to the opposition of London, agreed to purchase their oil

Page 3: A Century of War 9107

8/4/2019 A Century of War 9107

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-century-of-war-9107 3/3

Book Review

Gulf Research Center page 3 of 3

directly from OPEC countries, depositing their financial surpluses into Continental European banks and,

ultimately, into the EMS.

According to the Engdahl analysis, following the fall of the Shah and Khomeini’s rise to power with American

help in 1979, Iran singled out the country’s nuclear power development plans drawn up under the Shah and

cancelled the entire program for French and German nuclear reactor construction. Iran’s oil exports were cut

off by 3 million barrels per day with Saudi Arabia following suit. The ensuing energy crisis, nevertheless, wasover by the end of 1979.

In 1985, oil came to the rescue of the American economy: Saudi Arabia was persuaded to run a ‘reverse oilshock’ and flood the depressed world oil market with its abundant oil. This was intended to offset inflation but,

in the end, it did not do the trick. Both Britain and America were facing a financial crisis during the early

1990s. Saddam invaded Kuwait after Iraq had emerged from its costly war with Iran. Operation Desert Storm

followed. Moreover, the 1990s saw the hopes for a new era of peace and prosperity dashed.

In 2001, George W. Bush came to power surrounded by several members of his cabinet hailing from the oil

industry. William Engdahl argues that oil and geopolitics were back on centre stage in Washington. Iraq was to

become the focus of the new administration and Saddam Hussein targeted for removal. It was suggested that

US policy was to be shaped to take direct military control of the Arabian Gulf – attacks on Afghanistan andIraq being the first step towards achieving this policy.

The author wonders whether we have arrived at the last days of oil. Perhaps the answer is ‘No’ given that new

sources of oil have been already identified in Libya, Sudan, Colombia, and Venezuela in addition to Iraq.

This is a book abundant with detail, written in journalistic jargon. The link between whatever has happened in

world politics from 1815 to date on the one hand, and the Anglo-American quest for domination of oil on the

other, may have been intended to benefit Engdahl’s analysis. As a single-factor explanation, however, it may be

deficient. Concentrating on the politics of oil may provide some understanding of world politics. A fuller

appreciation of realpolitik , nonetheless, demands that other variables be incorporated in the equation.