7/4/2015 of care for a patient with altered tissue perfusion. –integrate lactate levels, base...
TRANSCRIPT
7/4/2015
1
Leanna R. Miller, RN, MN, CCRN – CSC, PCCN – CMC, CEN, CNRN, NP
Education Specialist LRM Consulting
Nashville, TN
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
• Behavioral Objectives
– Evaluate the effect of therapeutics on the delivery
of oxygen to the cells.
– Correlate physical signs and symptoms, diagnostic
studies, and hemodynamic alterations to develop a
plan of care for a patient with altered tissue
perfusion.
– Integrate lactate levels, base excess, and oxygen
deliver and consumption parameters into clinical
decision making and selection of therapeutic
modalities.
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Definition
tissue perfusion that is inadequate to maintain normal metabolic and nutritional functions
if unresolved, progresses to an irreversible state that results in multisystem organ failure & death
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
2
Introduction
12% to 18% of patients
presenting initially in severe
shock have increased
mortality or morbidity
related to secondary organ
failure
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Clinical Signs of Shock
Preterminal Stages
severe hypotension
agonal respirations
thready pulse
tachy or bradydysrhythmias
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
3
• Vital Signs
• Hemodynamic Parameters
• Global Indices
• Organ Specific Indices
Parameters Used to Assess Shock
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Assessing Shock
• Majority of patients are still in compensated shock even though VS, CI, UO & SvO2 have returned to normal
• 80% of trauma patients with normal BP showed signs of hypoperfusion to non vital organs
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Assessing Shock
• 85% has increased lactate and
decreased SvO2 even though HR,
BP, UO were normal
• Compensatory mechanisms mask
true organ perfusion
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
4
Shock Index
HR / systolic blood pressure
inversely related to LVSW
abnormal > 0.9
application: persistently abnormal
shock index in patient with normal
VS suggests need for more
invasive monitoring
Rady (1992) Resuscitation 23:227 - 234
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
most important
parameter in the
care of a critically ill
patient is delivery of
oxygen to the cells
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
CO X CaO2 X 10
CaO2 = Hgb x SaO2 x 1.38
Normal 900 - 1100 mL/min
DO2I = 360 - 550 mL/min/m2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
5
oxygen consumption
CO x (SaO2 - SvO2) Hgb x 1.38 x 10
VO2 = 220 - 290 mL/min
VO2I = 108 - 165 mL/min/m2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
normally VO2 is
25% of DO2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
6
SvO2 or ScvO2
–SaO2
–Hgb
–CO
–VO2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
O2 Extraction Ratio
amount of oxygen extracted from blood as it passes through the tissues
(CaO2 - CvO2 )/ CaO2
values > 0.30 abnormal
> 0.35 serious
normal 22% to 27%
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
> 0.35
–increased VO2
–decreased DO2
–both
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
7
Supranormal Values
CI 4.5 L/min/m2
DO2I 600 L/min/m2
VO2I 170 mL/min/m2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
inadequate pulmonary
gas exchange
inadequate CO
inadequate oxygen
carrying capacity
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
8
conditions and activities
that alter demand and
consumption
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
critically low DO2
vasodilated state
vaso-obstructed state
diffusion distances
affinity of Hgb for O2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
increased extraction
once extraction maximized
– consumption is dependent
on delivery
demand > consumption =
O2 debt
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
9
volume
inotropes
vasoactive drugs
reassess peripheral
circulation
Therapeutics
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Identify potentially inadequate
DO2 states
–clinical evidence of shock
–SvO2 < 60%
–O2ER > 30%
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Identify pathological
flow dependency state
• DO2 with fluids
or inotrope
• recalculate VO2
• VO2 > 10-20
L/m2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
10
ensure accurate parameters
index to body size
eliminate sources of error
use parameters with < 5-10% variance
Calculations of O2 Delivery & Consumption
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
calculate actual VO2
estimate potential VO2
(look at factors that
demand)
O2 Supply / Demand Determinants
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
11
delivery needs to
by at least same
percentage as demand
O2 Supply / Demand Determinants
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Global Indicators of Perfusion
• SvO2, ScvO2
• Serum lactate
• Base Excess
• End Tidal CO2 monitoring
(PETCO2)
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
60 – 75%
75 – 80%
SvO2
ScvO2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
12
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Problems with SvO2, ScvO2
• reflects venous blood O2 saturation from entire body – not organ specific
• invasive monitoring
• does not reflect actual cellular utilization
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
may be or normal in
presence of hypoxia
not reliable reflection
of tissue hypoxia
reliable indicator of
tissue perfusion
Lactate Levels
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
13
indirect measure of
oxygen debt
time to normalization is
predictive of outcome
more helpful if used as
trend
Lactate Levels
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
liver is efficient at
metabolizing lactate
acute alcohol intoxication
affects lactate metabolism
liver injury will slow lactate
clearance
Lactate Levels
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
arterial more precise
normal < 1 mEq/L
> 3 - 4 mEq/L significant hypoperfusion – associated with higher mortality
will decrease 5 - 10% / hr when appropriate therapy used
Lactate Levels
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
14
Lab Studies – Base Excess
Normal value: - 2 to + 2
reflects the extent to which the body buffers have been exhausted
rapidity of normalizing base deficit decreases morbidity & mortality
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Lab Studies – Base Excess
values
- 2 to – 5 mild
- 6 to – 15 moderate
- 16 or higher severe
global indicator
trending is best use of info
more prognostic if used with lactate
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
PETCO2
• PETCO2 reflects carbon dioxide
at end expiration
• Normal is 35 – 45 mmHg
• PaCO2 – PETCO2 gradient is
2 – 5 mmHg
• PaCO2 is usually higher
• Inverse relationship with VE
– VE, PETCO2
– VE, PETCO2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
15
Assessment of Blood Flow
• in systemic blood flow
pulmonary blood flow
• PETCO2 is decreased
• Shock
– PETCO2
• Cardiac Arrest
– Absent or very low PETCO2
• ROSC
– Return to normal PETCO2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Tonometry
pHi
early warning of inadequate splanchnic tissue oxygenation
low pH = poor prognosis (consistently < 7.3)
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
StO2
• near infrared light illuminates
tissue
• light scatters and is absorbed
differently by oxygenated and
deoxygenated hemoglobin in
the microcirculation
• light returns to sensor and is
analyzed and displayed as %
StO2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
16
StO2
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
StO2
.75 - .90
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
O2 demands are 30-50%
triggers systemic inflammatory
response
Trauma
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
17
Hgb/Hct < 11/33 is associated with delivery-dependence
mortality if therapeutic targets reached < 12 - 24 hours
Trauma
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
CI > 4.5
DOI2 700
VOI2 170
Trauma
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
46 - year old male
– motor vehicle crash
– injuries: aortic disruption, severe bilateral pulmonary contusions, bilateral rib fractures, splenic fracture
– traumatic shock due to injuries
Case Study
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
18
Which hemodynamic
findings are abnormal?
Case Study
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
HR 52
BP 122/64/82
CVP 10
Case Study
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
HR 52
BP 122/64/82
CVP / PAOP 10/11
CI 4.6
RVSWI / LVSWI 17/61
PAP 46/22/32
Case Study
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
19
EDV / EDVI 237/107
EF 60%
O2ER 26.8
SvO2 .74
DO2 / DO2I 1603/722
VO2 / VO2I 430/194
Case Study
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
ABGs (.40 FiO2)
pH 7.31
pCO2 42
pO2 157
SaO2 .99
HCO3 20.8
SvO2 74%
P/F ratio 314.0
Case Study
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Lab Values
Hgb 12.1
Hct 31.0
Magnesium 1.7
Lactate 5.1
Base Excess -5.1
StO2 72%
Case Study
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
20
Does this patient need
further resuscitation?
Case Study
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
• 33 yr with GSW to chest
• 4 units of PRBC due to Hct of 27
• SVO2 – 70 after blood administration
• StO2 – 80%
• Lactate 1.2
• Does he need further treatment?
StO2 and Hemodynamic Monitoring
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
StO2 and Hemodynamic Monitoring
• 48 yr with GSW to head
• Levophed at 50 mcg
• BP 114/74
• StO2 – 91
• Lactate – 5.2
• Does he need further treatment?
–What BP is really needed
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
7/4/2015
21
Lactate Base Excess ScvO2 StO2
Early Early Delayed Early
Global Global Global Organ Specific
Invasive Invasive Invasive Non-invasive
Intermittent Intermittent Continuous Continuous
Delayed Info Delayed Info Real – time Real – time
Multiple
Variables
Multiple
Variables
Multiple
Variables
Specific
Requires additional info to direct appropriate interventions
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock
Optimizing Outcomes in Shock