5. potential for human exposure 5.1 overview · 5.3.2 transformation and degradation 5.3.2.1 air...
TRANSCRIPT
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 75
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
51 OVERVIEW
Di-n-octylphthalate is released mainly to the atmosphere and to some extent to surface waters in
industrial effluents (TRI92 1994) The compound may be released to soils in the disposal of plastics
wastes Di-n-octylphthalate is expected to partition mainly to soils and sediment upon release to the
environment (EPA 1979 1992c) The compound is also bioconcentrated by aquatic organisms
although biomagnification in aquatic food chains is not expected to be significant (EPA 1992d)
Aerobic biodegradation is the most important transformation process in soils and surface waters (EPA
1992a 1992c) Other transformation processes include photooxidation in the atmosphere and
photolysis in surface waters (EPA 1992a) As a result of confusion with its branched isomer di(2shy
ethylhexyl)phthalate limited unambiguous monitoring data are available for di-n-octylphthalate The
compound has been detected in ambient air rain runoff groundwater surface water and sediment
Human exposure to the compound is expected to occur primarily in workplace settings (HSDB 1995)
General population exposure pathways include inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer ingestion of
foods contaminated as a result of leaching of di-n-octylphthalate from plastic containers ingestion of
aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound and ingestion of contaminated drinking
water (EPA 1992c) Populations living near hazardous waste sites contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate
may also be exposed through dermal contact with and ingestion of contaminated
groundwater and sediments (ATSDR 1988 1989b 1989c) Populations with potentially high
exposures to di-n-octylphthalate include workers in the chemical manufacturing and plastics
manufacturing and processing industries individuals requiring routine medical care such as blood
transfusions and kidney dialysis treatments and individuals living in the vicinity of industrial
manufacturing and processing facilities that may manufacture or use di-n-octylphthalate or of
hazardous waste sites containing di-n-octylphthalate or plastics (HSDB 1995)
Di-n-octylphthalate has been identified in at least 300 of the 1416 hazardous waste sites on the EPA
National Priorities List (NPL) (HazDat 1995) However the number of sites evaluated for di-nshy
octylphthalate is not known The frequency of these sites within the United States can be seen in
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 76 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Figure 5-1 Of these sites 298 are located in the United States and 2 are located in the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (not shown)
52 RELEASES TO THE ENVIRONMENT
Considerable confusion exists in the literature about the TRI release reporting data and monitoring data
available for di-n-octylphthalate and its more common branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(EPA 1992a Vista Chemical 1992) The confusion exists because the terms ldquodioctyl phthalaterdquo and
ldquoDOPrdquo are often used as synonyms for di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate which is the largest volume
plasticizer used in PVC Consequently some of the historical release and monitoring data reported in
the literature as ldquodioctyl phthalaterdquo and ldquoDOPrdquo refer to the more common branched isomer rather than
di-n-octylphthalate Therefore releases of di-n-octylphthalate and concentrations of the compound in
ambient media may actually be lower than historical data suggest Di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn
from the TRI effective in 1993 (EPA 1995h) Thus the data for TRI92 (1994) is the most recent data
that is available from the Toxic Release Inventory for di-n-octylphthalate
521 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate may be released to the atmosphere through volatilization of the compound from
plastics as a result of manufacturing processes and through incineration (Vista Chemical 1992)
According to TR192 (1994) an estimated total of 15011 pounds of di-n-octylphthalate amounting to
about 98 of the total environmental release were discharged to the atmosphere from manufacturing
and processing facilities in the United States in 1992 (see Table 5-l) The TRI data listed in
Table 5-l should be used with caution since only certain types of facilities are required to report This
is not an exhaustive list Furthermore as noted above the precise chemical identity of the reported
releases is questionable
522 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate is released to surface waters in industrial waste waters from production and use
processes and as a result of spills during its transport storage and use (Mathur 1974a) For example
di-n-octylphthalate was found in one of five industrial process waste waters sampled at an average
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 81
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concentration of 3700 microgL (EPA 1981) Releases to surface waters are expected to undergo
secondary treatment at publicly owned treatment works or at on-site National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities Such waste-water treatment systems are expected to
remove 80-90 of the influent di-n-octylphthalate through a combination of adsorption and aerobic
biodegradation by acclimated microorganisms (EPA 1992c Petrasek et al 1983) The compound is
also released to surface waters from nonpoint sources such as surface runoff For example di-nshy
octylphthalate was found in runoff samples collected in 1982 from Little Rock Arkansas Bellevue
Washington and Eugene Oregon at a 4 frequency of detection in the collected samples and at
concentrations of 04-l microgL This sampling was conducted as part of the Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program (Cole et al 1984)
According to TR192 (1994) an estimated total of 41 pounds of di-n-octylphthalate were discharged to
surface waters from manufacturing and processing facilities in the United States in 1992 (see
Table 5-l) An estimated total additional 1475 pounds were transferred to publicly owned treatment
works The TRI data listed in Table 5-l should be used with caution since only certain types of
facilities are required to report This is not an exhaustive list Furthermore as noted above the
precise chemical identity of the reported releases is questionable
523 Soil
According to TR192 (1994) an estimated total of 250 pounds of di-n-octylphthalate amounting to
about 2 of the total environmental release was discharged to soils from manufacturing and
processing facilities in the United States in 1992 (see Table 5-l) An estimated total additional
239134 pounds were transferred to off-site waste treatment storage and disposal facilities The TRI
data listed in Table 5-l should be used with caution since only certain types of facilities are required
to report This is not an exhaustive list Furthermore as noted above the precise chemical identity of
the reported releases is questionable
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 82 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
53 ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
531 Transport and Partitioning
Upon release to surface waters di-n-octylphthalate is expected to partition mainly to sediments and to
suspended particulates In a pilot-scale waste-water treatment system di-n-octylphthalate partitioned
mainly to primary treatment sludge (Petrasek et al 1983) The compound strongly adsorbs to organic
matter contained in soils and sediments adsorption is probably the most important transport process
for the compound in surface waters (EPA 1979 1992c) Volatilization from surface waters is expected
to be a slow and unimportant process For example the estimated volatilization half-life from a model
river 1 meter deep with a current of 1 metersecond and a wind speed of 3 meterssecond is 13 days
(HSDB 1995) In a pilot-scale study of a typical waste-water treatment plant employing both primary
and secondary activated sludge treatment processes no di-n-octylphthalate was lost from the system by
air stripping (Petrasek et al 1983) However in a study simulating the behavior of di-n-octylphthalate
in different aquatic systems volatilization was estimated to account for up to 20 of the losses of the
compound from certain standing surface water systems characterized by long water detention times
(eg ponds lakes) especially in relatively pristine lakes where loss by biodegradation is not likely to
be important (Wolfe et al 1980) This same study suggests that in running surface waters such as
rivers di-n-octylphthalate is most likely to be lost by transport out of the system
Di-n-octylphthalate also strongly adsorbs to soils and does not undergo leaching to groundwater as
indicated by its estimated soil organic carbonwater partition coefficient (Koc) of about 19000
Volatilization from soils is not expected to be significant (HSDB 1994 Vista Chemical 1992)
Di-n-octylphthalate released to the atmosphere may partition to soils and surface waters through wet
(Ligocki et al 1985) and dry (Vista Chemical 1992) deposition processes
Di-n-octylphthalate is bioconcentrated by aquatic organisms (EPA 1992d) In a 33-day combined
terrestrial-aquatic model ecosystem study the following di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentration factors
(BCFs) were reported (1) algae - 28500 (2) daphnids - 2600 (3) fish and mosquitoes - 9400 and
(4) snails - 13600 However the half-life for the disappearance of di-n-octylphthalate from this model
system was estimated to be about 5 days as the result of metabolism of the compound An EPA
(1992d) hazard assessment stated that although di-n-octylphthalate does bioconcentrate in aquatic
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 83 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
organisms the compound is not expected to biomagnify in aquatic food chains however this citation
did not contain and does not reference any studies that provide a basis for this conclusion In
greenhouse studies using radiolabeled di-n-octylphthalate added to soils the compound was not
bioconcentrated by crop plants (BCF lt1) (EPA 1986e) In a more recent screening study that
examined the potential of contaminants contained in sewage sludge to transfer into agricultural
products on the basis of their physicalchemical properties di-n-octylphthalate was judged to have a
high potential to adsorb to soil sludge solids and plant root surfaces and a low potential for leaching
uptake and translocation by plants and transfer to animal tissues by foliage ingestion (Wild and Jones
1992)
532 Transformation and Degradation
5321 Air
The most important transformation process for di-n-octylphthalate present in the atmosphere as an
aerosol is reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals The half-life for this reaction has
been estimated to be 45-448 hours (Howard et al 1991) Actual atmospheric half-lives may be
longer since phthalate esters sorbed to wind-entrained particulates may have long atmospheric
residence times (Vista Chemical 1992) Direct photolysis in the atmosphere is not expected to be an
important process (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995)
5322 Water
Phthalate esters undergo a step-wise alkaline hydrolysis to monoesters and then to dicarboxylic acids
As a result of the relatively slow rates of this reaction at pH 6-9 and the low water solubility of di-nshy
octylphthalate chemical hydrolysis of the compound is not an environmentally important
transformation process (EPA 1992a) Hydrolytic half-lives at 25degC and pH 7 and 9 have been
estimated to be 107 and 7 years respectively (Howard et al 1991)
Biodegradation is the primary process by which phthalate esters are removed from surface waters
rates are strongly dependent on acclimation of microbial communities (EPA 1992a 1992~) Wolfe et
al (1980) predicted that biodegradation would be the most important mechanism by which di-nshy
octylphthalate would be removed from eutrophic lakes In static culture flask biodegradation screening
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 84 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
tests about 93-94 of di-n-octylphthalate was metabolized after 3 weeks only after serial subculturing
of acclimated microorganisms (Tabak et al 1981) Enzymatic hydrolysis is the mechanism used by
microbes in the aerobic biotransformation of di-n-octylphthalate The ester is hydrolyzed to soluble
intermediates presumably via a pathway producing a phthalic acid monoester (EPA 1993a) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not available Aerobic biodegradation half-lives
range from 1 to 4 weeks in surface waters and from 2 weeks to 1 year in groundwater (Howard et al
1991) Biodegradation under anaerobic conditions occurs at a slower rate (EPA 1993a) it has been
predicted that di-n-octylphthalate will accumulate in natural sediments because it is persistent under
anaerobic conditions (EPA 1992d) For example in anaerobic digester studies using diluted and
undiluted sewage treatment plant sludge between 40 and 75 of di-n-octylphthalate remained
undegraded after a 10-week incubation period (Shelton et al 1984) Anaerobic half-lives for aquatic
systems have been predicted to range from 6 months to 1 year (Howard et al 1991)
Di-n-octylphthalate may also undergo photolysis in surface waters as a result of its absorption of
electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths less than 290 nm The estimated photolytic half-life of the
compound in surface water is 144 days (EPA 1992a) Photolysis was predicted to be the most
important removal mechanism after volatilization for di-n-octylphthalate losses from oligotrophic lakes
(Wolfe et al 1980)
5323 Sediment and Soil
As discussed above aerobic biotransformation is expected to be the most important process in the
removal of di-n-octylphthalate from soils anaerobic biodegradation occurs in sediments (EPA 1992a)
However because of its persistence under anaerobic conditions di-n-octylphthalate is expected to
accumulate in sediments (EPA 1992d) Di-n-octylphthalate has been reported to undergo
biodegradation by a variety of acclimated soil microorganisms (HSDB 1995 Mathur 1974b) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not located
54 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT
As previously discussed considerable confusion exists in the literature about the monitoring data
available for di-n-octylphthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Only monitoring data that clearly
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 85 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concerned di-n-octylphthalate were included in this section of the profile data from ambiguous studies
were not included
541 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in five of seven ambient air and six of seven rainwater samples
collected during rain events that occurred in February through April 1984 in Portland Oregon Di-nshy
octylphthalate concentrations ranged from 26 to 20 ngL in rain samples and from 006 to 094 ngm3
in air samples (Ligocki et al 1985)
542 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in 4 of the urban runoff samples collected from a total of 15 cities
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at three cities at concentrations of 04-l microgL (Cole et al 1984) The
compound was found in water samples collected at four locations along the entire length of the
Mississippi River at concentrations of 24-310 ngL (DeLeon et al 1986) At the Butler Mine Tunnel
NPL Site located in Pittston Pennsylvania di-n-octylphthalate was detected in on-site oilgroundwater
samples at concentrations of ll0-792000 ppb (ATSDR 1989b) Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a
concentration of 1 ppb in a water sample collected from the discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant
located on the Chester River in Maryland (Peterson and Freeman 1984) Di-n-octylphthalate was
found at 0001-002 ppm in water samples taken from a river that received industrial waste water from
a specialty chemical manufacturing plant (Jungclaus et al 1978)
Estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in receiving waters located downstream from two plants
reporting releases of the compound to the TRI have been developed by EPA (1992c) Mean flow
concentrations of about 3-9 microgL and 7-year Ql0 low-flow concentrations of about 90-390 microgL were
estimated for the surface waters receiving effluent from the on-site treatment facility used at one plant
and the publicly owned treatment facility that handles the effluent from the other plant
Concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in drinking water utility influents have been estimated to be less
than 05 ppb (EPA 1992c)
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 86 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
543 Sediment and Soil
In the sediment of a discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant located on the Chester River in
Maryland di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 12000 ppb In sediment samples
from the Chester River taken 2 km and 8 km downstream from the plant the compound was found at
concentrations of 62 and lt5 ppb respectively (Peterson and Freeman 1984) In the sediment of a
river that received industrial waste water from a specialty chemical manufacturing plant di-nshy
octylphthalate was detected at concentrations ranging from 15 to 25 ppm (Jungclaus et al 1978) At
the Dixie Caverns Landfill NPL site located in Salem Virginia di-n-octylphthalate was detected on-site at
a concentration of 80 ppm (ATSDR 1988) however the media in which this concentration was
detected was not specified Off-site sediment samples collected at the Revere Chemical Company
NPL site located in Revere Pennsylvania were found to contain 2300 ppb di-n-octylphthalate
(ATSDR 1989c)
EPA (1992c) developed estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in the sediments of surface
waters located downstream from two plants reporting releases of the compound to the TRI The
surface waters received effluents from an on-site treatment facility and a publicly owned treatment
facility Steady-state sediment concentrations were estimated to exceed 10 mgkg and possibly
gt50 mgkg downstream from the two facilities
544 Other Environmental Media
Di-n-octylphthalate is produced as a decomposition product of the pesticide dinocap (HSDB 1995)
55 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Humans are expected to be exposed to di-n-octylphthalate mainly in the workplace (HSDB 1994)
The National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted between 1981 and 1983 estimated
that 10393 workers (including 1434 women) in 1177 facilities were exposed to di-n-octylphthalate in
the workplace in 1980 (NIOSH 1993)
Exposure of the general population to di-n-octylphthalate may occur through ingestion of foods
contaminated by leaching of the compound from plastic containers transfusions of blood or other
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 76 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Figure 5-1 Of these sites 298 are located in the United States and 2 are located in the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (not shown)
52 RELEASES TO THE ENVIRONMENT
Considerable confusion exists in the literature about the TRI release reporting data and monitoring data
available for di-n-octylphthalate and its more common branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(EPA 1992a Vista Chemical 1992) The confusion exists because the terms ldquodioctyl phthalaterdquo and
ldquoDOPrdquo are often used as synonyms for di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate which is the largest volume
plasticizer used in PVC Consequently some of the historical release and monitoring data reported in
the literature as ldquodioctyl phthalaterdquo and ldquoDOPrdquo refer to the more common branched isomer rather than
di-n-octylphthalate Therefore releases of di-n-octylphthalate and concentrations of the compound in
ambient media may actually be lower than historical data suggest Di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn
from the TRI effective in 1993 (EPA 1995h) Thus the data for TRI92 (1994) is the most recent data
that is available from the Toxic Release Inventory for di-n-octylphthalate
521 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate may be released to the atmosphere through volatilization of the compound from
plastics as a result of manufacturing processes and through incineration (Vista Chemical 1992)
According to TR192 (1994) an estimated total of 15011 pounds of di-n-octylphthalate amounting to
about 98 of the total environmental release were discharged to the atmosphere from manufacturing
and processing facilities in the United States in 1992 (see Table 5-l) The TRI data listed in
Table 5-l should be used with caution since only certain types of facilities are required to report This
is not an exhaustive list Furthermore as noted above the precise chemical identity of the reported
releases is questionable
522 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate is released to surface waters in industrial waste waters from production and use
processes and as a result of spills during its transport storage and use (Mathur 1974a) For example
di-n-octylphthalate was found in one of five industrial process waste waters sampled at an average
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 81
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concentration of 3700 microgL (EPA 1981) Releases to surface waters are expected to undergo
secondary treatment at publicly owned treatment works or at on-site National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities Such waste-water treatment systems are expected to
remove 80-90 of the influent di-n-octylphthalate through a combination of adsorption and aerobic
biodegradation by acclimated microorganisms (EPA 1992c Petrasek et al 1983) The compound is
also released to surface waters from nonpoint sources such as surface runoff For example di-nshy
octylphthalate was found in runoff samples collected in 1982 from Little Rock Arkansas Bellevue
Washington and Eugene Oregon at a 4 frequency of detection in the collected samples and at
concentrations of 04-l microgL This sampling was conducted as part of the Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program (Cole et al 1984)
According to TR192 (1994) an estimated total of 41 pounds of di-n-octylphthalate were discharged to
surface waters from manufacturing and processing facilities in the United States in 1992 (see
Table 5-l) An estimated total additional 1475 pounds were transferred to publicly owned treatment
works The TRI data listed in Table 5-l should be used with caution since only certain types of
facilities are required to report This is not an exhaustive list Furthermore as noted above the
precise chemical identity of the reported releases is questionable
523 Soil
According to TR192 (1994) an estimated total of 250 pounds of di-n-octylphthalate amounting to
about 2 of the total environmental release was discharged to soils from manufacturing and
processing facilities in the United States in 1992 (see Table 5-l) An estimated total additional
239134 pounds were transferred to off-site waste treatment storage and disposal facilities The TRI
data listed in Table 5-l should be used with caution since only certain types of facilities are required
to report This is not an exhaustive list Furthermore as noted above the precise chemical identity of
the reported releases is questionable
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 82 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
53 ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
531 Transport and Partitioning
Upon release to surface waters di-n-octylphthalate is expected to partition mainly to sediments and to
suspended particulates In a pilot-scale waste-water treatment system di-n-octylphthalate partitioned
mainly to primary treatment sludge (Petrasek et al 1983) The compound strongly adsorbs to organic
matter contained in soils and sediments adsorption is probably the most important transport process
for the compound in surface waters (EPA 1979 1992c) Volatilization from surface waters is expected
to be a slow and unimportant process For example the estimated volatilization half-life from a model
river 1 meter deep with a current of 1 metersecond and a wind speed of 3 meterssecond is 13 days
(HSDB 1995) In a pilot-scale study of a typical waste-water treatment plant employing both primary
and secondary activated sludge treatment processes no di-n-octylphthalate was lost from the system by
air stripping (Petrasek et al 1983) However in a study simulating the behavior of di-n-octylphthalate
in different aquatic systems volatilization was estimated to account for up to 20 of the losses of the
compound from certain standing surface water systems characterized by long water detention times
(eg ponds lakes) especially in relatively pristine lakes where loss by biodegradation is not likely to
be important (Wolfe et al 1980) This same study suggests that in running surface waters such as
rivers di-n-octylphthalate is most likely to be lost by transport out of the system
Di-n-octylphthalate also strongly adsorbs to soils and does not undergo leaching to groundwater as
indicated by its estimated soil organic carbonwater partition coefficient (Koc) of about 19000
Volatilization from soils is not expected to be significant (HSDB 1994 Vista Chemical 1992)
Di-n-octylphthalate released to the atmosphere may partition to soils and surface waters through wet
(Ligocki et al 1985) and dry (Vista Chemical 1992) deposition processes
Di-n-octylphthalate is bioconcentrated by aquatic organisms (EPA 1992d) In a 33-day combined
terrestrial-aquatic model ecosystem study the following di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentration factors
(BCFs) were reported (1) algae - 28500 (2) daphnids - 2600 (3) fish and mosquitoes - 9400 and
(4) snails - 13600 However the half-life for the disappearance of di-n-octylphthalate from this model
system was estimated to be about 5 days as the result of metabolism of the compound An EPA
(1992d) hazard assessment stated that although di-n-octylphthalate does bioconcentrate in aquatic
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 83 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
organisms the compound is not expected to biomagnify in aquatic food chains however this citation
did not contain and does not reference any studies that provide a basis for this conclusion In
greenhouse studies using radiolabeled di-n-octylphthalate added to soils the compound was not
bioconcentrated by crop plants (BCF lt1) (EPA 1986e) In a more recent screening study that
examined the potential of contaminants contained in sewage sludge to transfer into agricultural
products on the basis of their physicalchemical properties di-n-octylphthalate was judged to have a
high potential to adsorb to soil sludge solids and plant root surfaces and a low potential for leaching
uptake and translocation by plants and transfer to animal tissues by foliage ingestion (Wild and Jones
1992)
532 Transformation and Degradation
5321 Air
The most important transformation process for di-n-octylphthalate present in the atmosphere as an
aerosol is reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals The half-life for this reaction has
been estimated to be 45-448 hours (Howard et al 1991) Actual atmospheric half-lives may be
longer since phthalate esters sorbed to wind-entrained particulates may have long atmospheric
residence times (Vista Chemical 1992) Direct photolysis in the atmosphere is not expected to be an
important process (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995)
5322 Water
Phthalate esters undergo a step-wise alkaline hydrolysis to monoesters and then to dicarboxylic acids
As a result of the relatively slow rates of this reaction at pH 6-9 and the low water solubility of di-nshy
octylphthalate chemical hydrolysis of the compound is not an environmentally important
transformation process (EPA 1992a) Hydrolytic half-lives at 25degC and pH 7 and 9 have been
estimated to be 107 and 7 years respectively (Howard et al 1991)
Biodegradation is the primary process by which phthalate esters are removed from surface waters
rates are strongly dependent on acclimation of microbial communities (EPA 1992a 1992~) Wolfe et
al (1980) predicted that biodegradation would be the most important mechanism by which di-nshy
octylphthalate would be removed from eutrophic lakes In static culture flask biodegradation screening
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 84 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
tests about 93-94 of di-n-octylphthalate was metabolized after 3 weeks only after serial subculturing
of acclimated microorganisms (Tabak et al 1981) Enzymatic hydrolysis is the mechanism used by
microbes in the aerobic biotransformation of di-n-octylphthalate The ester is hydrolyzed to soluble
intermediates presumably via a pathway producing a phthalic acid monoester (EPA 1993a) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not available Aerobic biodegradation half-lives
range from 1 to 4 weeks in surface waters and from 2 weeks to 1 year in groundwater (Howard et al
1991) Biodegradation under anaerobic conditions occurs at a slower rate (EPA 1993a) it has been
predicted that di-n-octylphthalate will accumulate in natural sediments because it is persistent under
anaerobic conditions (EPA 1992d) For example in anaerobic digester studies using diluted and
undiluted sewage treatment plant sludge between 40 and 75 of di-n-octylphthalate remained
undegraded after a 10-week incubation period (Shelton et al 1984) Anaerobic half-lives for aquatic
systems have been predicted to range from 6 months to 1 year (Howard et al 1991)
Di-n-octylphthalate may also undergo photolysis in surface waters as a result of its absorption of
electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths less than 290 nm The estimated photolytic half-life of the
compound in surface water is 144 days (EPA 1992a) Photolysis was predicted to be the most
important removal mechanism after volatilization for di-n-octylphthalate losses from oligotrophic lakes
(Wolfe et al 1980)
5323 Sediment and Soil
As discussed above aerobic biotransformation is expected to be the most important process in the
removal of di-n-octylphthalate from soils anaerobic biodegradation occurs in sediments (EPA 1992a)
However because of its persistence under anaerobic conditions di-n-octylphthalate is expected to
accumulate in sediments (EPA 1992d) Di-n-octylphthalate has been reported to undergo
biodegradation by a variety of acclimated soil microorganisms (HSDB 1995 Mathur 1974b) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not located
54 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT
As previously discussed considerable confusion exists in the literature about the monitoring data
available for di-n-octylphthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Only monitoring data that clearly
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 85 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concerned di-n-octylphthalate were included in this section of the profile data from ambiguous studies
were not included
541 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in five of seven ambient air and six of seven rainwater samples
collected during rain events that occurred in February through April 1984 in Portland Oregon Di-nshy
octylphthalate concentrations ranged from 26 to 20 ngL in rain samples and from 006 to 094 ngm3
in air samples (Ligocki et al 1985)
542 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in 4 of the urban runoff samples collected from a total of 15 cities
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at three cities at concentrations of 04-l microgL (Cole et al 1984) The
compound was found in water samples collected at four locations along the entire length of the
Mississippi River at concentrations of 24-310 ngL (DeLeon et al 1986) At the Butler Mine Tunnel
NPL Site located in Pittston Pennsylvania di-n-octylphthalate was detected in on-site oilgroundwater
samples at concentrations of ll0-792000 ppb (ATSDR 1989b) Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a
concentration of 1 ppb in a water sample collected from the discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant
located on the Chester River in Maryland (Peterson and Freeman 1984) Di-n-octylphthalate was
found at 0001-002 ppm in water samples taken from a river that received industrial waste water from
a specialty chemical manufacturing plant (Jungclaus et al 1978)
Estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in receiving waters located downstream from two plants
reporting releases of the compound to the TRI have been developed by EPA (1992c) Mean flow
concentrations of about 3-9 microgL and 7-year Ql0 low-flow concentrations of about 90-390 microgL were
estimated for the surface waters receiving effluent from the on-site treatment facility used at one plant
and the publicly owned treatment facility that handles the effluent from the other plant
Concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in drinking water utility influents have been estimated to be less
than 05 ppb (EPA 1992c)
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 86 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
543 Sediment and Soil
In the sediment of a discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant located on the Chester River in
Maryland di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 12000 ppb In sediment samples
from the Chester River taken 2 km and 8 km downstream from the plant the compound was found at
concentrations of 62 and lt5 ppb respectively (Peterson and Freeman 1984) In the sediment of a
river that received industrial waste water from a specialty chemical manufacturing plant di-nshy
octylphthalate was detected at concentrations ranging from 15 to 25 ppm (Jungclaus et al 1978) At
the Dixie Caverns Landfill NPL site located in Salem Virginia di-n-octylphthalate was detected on-site at
a concentration of 80 ppm (ATSDR 1988) however the media in which this concentration was
detected was not specified Off-site sediment samples collected at the Revere Chemical Company
NPL site located in Revere Pennsylvania were found to contain 2300 ppb di-n-octylphthalate
(ATSDR 1989c)
EPA (1992c) developed estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in the sediments of surface
waters located downstream from two plants reporting releases of the compound to the TRI The
surface waters received effluents from an on-site treatment facility and a publicly owned treatment
facility Steady-state sediment concentrations were estimated to exceed 10 mgkg and possibly
gt50 mgkg downstream from the two facilities
544 Other Environmental Media
Di-n-octylphthalate is produced as a decomposition product of the pesticide dinocap (HSDB 1995)
55 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Humans are expected to be exposed to di-n-octylphthalate mainly in the workplace (HSDB 1994)
The National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted between 1981 and 1983 estimated
that 10393 workers (including 1434 women) in 1177 facilities were exposed to di-n-octylphthalate in
the workplace in 1980 (NIOSH 1993)
Exposure of the general population to di-n-octylphthalate may occur through ingestion of foods
contaminated by leaching of the compound from plastic containers transfusions of blood or other
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 81
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concentration of 3700 microgL (EPA 1981) Releases to surface waters are expected to undergo
secondary treatment at publicly owned treatment works or at on-site National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities Such waste-water treatment systems are expected to
remove 80-90 of the influent di-n-octylphthalate through a combination of adsorption and aerobic
biodegradation by acclimated microorganisms (EPA 1992c Petrasek et al 1983) The compound is
also released to surface waters from nonpoint sources such as surface runoff For example di-nshy
octylphthalate was found in runoff samples collected in 1982 from Little Rock Arkansas Bellevue
Washington and Eugene Oregon at a 4 frequency of detection in the collected samples and at
concentrations of 04-l microgL This sampling was conducted as part of the Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program (Cole et al 1984)
According to TR192 (1994) an estimated total of 41 pounds of di-n-octylphthalate were discharged to
surface waters from manufacturing and processing facilities in the United States in 1992 (see
Table 5-l) An estimated total additional 1475 pounds were transferred to publicly owned treatment
works The TRI data listed in Table 5-l should be used with caution since only certain types of
facilities are required to report This is not an exhaustive list Furthermore as noted above the
precise chemical identity of the reported releases is questionable
523 Soil
According to TR192 (1994) an estimated total of 250 pounds of di-n-octylphthalate amounting to
about 2 of the total environmental release was discharged to soils from manufacturing and
processing facilities in the United States in 1992 (see Table 5-l) An estimated total additional
239134 pounds were transferred to off-site waste treatment storage and disposal facilities The TRI
data listed in Table 5-l should be used with caution since only certain types of facilities are required
to report This is not an exhaustive list Furthermore as noted above the precise chemical identity of
the reported releases is questionable
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 82 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
53 ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
531 Transport and Partitioning
Upon release to surface waters di-n-octylphthalate is expected to partition mainly to sediments and to
suspended particulates In a pilot-scale waste-water treatment system di-n-octylphthalate partitioned
mainly to primary treatment sludge (Petrasek et al 1983) The compound strongly adsorbs to organic
matter contained in soils and sediments adsorption is probably the most important transport process
for the compound in surface waters (EPA 1979 1992c) Volatilization from surface waters is expected
to be a slow and unimportant process For example the estimated volatilization half-life from a model
river 1 meter deep with a current of 1 metersecond and a wind speed of 3 meterssecond is 13 days
(HSDB 1995) In a pilot-scale study of a typical waste-water treatment plant employing both primary
and secondary activated sludge treatment processes no di-n-octylphthalate was lost from the system by
air stripping (Petrasek et al 1983) However in a study simulating the behavior of di-n-octylphthalate
in different aquatic systems volatilization was estimated to account for up to 20 of the losses of the
compound from certain standing surface water systems characterized by long water detention times
(eg ponds lakes) especially in relatively pristine lakes where loss by biodegradation is not likely to
be important (Wolfe et al 1980) This same study suggests that in running surface waters such as
rivers di-n-octylphthalate is most likely to be lost by transport out of the system
Di-n-octylphthalate also strongly adsorbs to soils and does not undergo leaching to groundwater as
indicated by its estimated soil organic carbonwater partition coefficient (Koc) of about 19000
Volatilization from soils is not expected to be significant (HSDB 1994 Vista Chemical 1992)
Di-n-octylphthalate released to the atmosphere may partition to soils and surface waters through wet
(Ligocki et al 1985) and dry (Vista Chemical 1992) deposition processes
Di-n-octylphthalate is bioconcentrated by aquatic organisms (EPA 1992d) In a 33-day combined
terrestrial-aquatic model ecosystem study the following di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentration factors
(BCFs) were reported (1) algae - 28500 (2) daphnids - 2600 (3) fish and mosquitoes - 9400 and
(4) snails - 13600 However the half-life for the disappearance of di-n-octylphthalate from this model
system was estimated to be about 5 days as the result of metabolism of the compound An EPA
(1992d) hazard assessment stated that although di-n-octylphthalate does bioconcentrate in aquatic
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 83 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
organisms the compound is not expected to biomagnify in aquatic food chains however this citation
did not contain and does not reference any studies that provide a basis for this conclusion In
greenhouse studies using radiolabeled di-n-octylphthalate added to soils the compound was not
bioconcentrated by crop plants (BCF lt1) (EPA 1986e) In a more recent screening study that
examined the potential of contaminants contained in sewage sludge to transfer into agricultural
products on the basis of their physicalchemical properties di-n-octylphthalate was judged to have a
high potential to adsorb to soil sludge solids and plant root surfaces and a low potential for leaching
uptake and translocation by plants and transfer to animal tissues by foliage ingestion (Wild and Jones
1992)
532 Transformation and Degradation
5321 Air
The most important transformation process for di-n-octylphthalate present in the atmosphere as an
aerosol is reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals The half-life for this reaction has
been estimated to be 45-448 hours (Howard et al 1991) Actual atmospheric half-lives may be
longer since phthalate esters sorbed to wind-entrained particulates may have long atmospheric
residence times (Vista Chemical 1992) Direct photolysis in the atmosphere is not expected to be an
important process (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995)
5322 Water
Phthalate esters undergo a step-wise alkaline hydrolysis to monoesters and then to dicarboxylic acids
As a result of the relatively slow rates of this reaction at pH 6-9 and the low water solubility of di-nshy
octylphthalate chemical hydrolysis of the compound is not an environmentally important
transformation process (EPA 1992a) Hydrolytic half-lives at 25degC and pH 7 and 9 have been
estimated to be 107 and 7 years respectively (Howard et al 1991)
Biodegradation is the primary process by which phthalate esters are removed from surface waters
rates are strongly dependent on acclimation of microbial communities (EPA 1992a 1992~) Wolfe et
al (1980) predicted that biodegradation would be the most important mechanism by which di-nshy
octylphthalate would be removed from eutrophic lakes In static culture flask biodegradation screening
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 84 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
tests about 93-94 of di-n-octylphthalate was metabolized after 3 weeks only after serial subculturing
of acclimated microorganisms (Tabak et al 1981) Enzymatic hydrolysis is the mechanism used by
microbes in the aerobic biotransformation of di-n-octylphthalate The ester is hydrolyzed to soluble
intermediates presumably via a pathway producing a phthalic acid monoester (EPA 1993a) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not available Aerobic biodegradation half-lives
range from 1 to 4 weeks in surface waters and from 2 weeks to 1 year in groundwater (Howard et al
1991) Biodegradation under anaerobic conditions occurs at a slower rate (EPA 1993a) it has been
predicted that di-n-octylphthalate will accumulate in natural sediments because it is persistent under
anaerobic conditions (EPA 1992d) For example in anaerobic digester studies using diluted and
undiluted sewage treatment plant sludge between 40 and 75 of di-n-octylphthalate remained
undegraded after a 10-week incubation period (Shelton et al 1984) Anaerobic half-lives for aquatic
systems have been predicted to range from 6 months to 1 year (Howard et al 1991)
Di-n-octylphthalate may also undergo photolysis in surface waters as a result of its absorption of
electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths less than 290 nm The estimated photolytic half-life of the
compound in surface water is 144 days (EPA 1992a) Photolysis was predicted to be the most
important removal mechanism after volatilization for di-n-octylphthalate losses from oligotrophic lakes
(Wolfe et al 1980)
5323 Sediment and Soil
As discussed above aerobic biotransformation is expected to be the most important process in the
removal of di-n-octylphthalate from soils anaerobic biodegradation occurs in sediments (EPA 1992a)
However because of its persistence under anaerobic conditions di-n-octylphthalate is expected to
accumulate in sediments (EPA 1992d) Di-n-octylphthalate has been reported to undergo
biodegradation by a variety of acclimated soil microorganisms (HSDB 1995 Mathur 1974b) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not located
54 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT
As previously discussed considerable confusion exists in the literature about the monitoring data
available for di-n-octylphthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Only monitoring data that clearly
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 85 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concerned di-n-octylphthalate were included in this section of the profile data from ambiguous studies
were not included
541 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in five of seven ambient air and six of seven rainwater samples
collected during rain events that occurred in February through April 1984 in Portland Oregon Di-nshy
octylphthalate concentrations ranged from 26 to 20 ngL in rain samples and from 006 to 094 ngm3
in air samples (Ligocki et al 1985)
542 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in 4 of the urban runoff samples collected from a total of 15 cities
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at three cities at concentrations of 04-l microgL (Cole et al 1984) The
compound was found in water samples collected at four locations along the entire length of the
Mississippi River at concentrations of 24-310 ngL (DeLeon et al 1986) At the Butler Mine Tunnel
NPL Site located in Pittston Pennsylvania di-n-octylphthalate was detected in on-site oilgroundwater
samples at concentrations of ll0-792000 ppb (ATSDR 1989b) Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a
concentration of 1 ppb in a water sample collected from the discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant
located on the Chester River in Maryland (Peterson and Freeman 1984) Di-n-octylphthalate was
found at 0001-002 ppm in water samples taken from a river that received industrial waste water from
a specialty chemical manufacturing plant (Jungclaus et al 1978)
Estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in receiving waters located downstream from two plants
reporting releases of the compound to the TRI have been developed by EPA (1992c) Mean flow
concentrations of about 3-9 microgL and 7-year Ql0 low-flow concentrations of about 90-390 microgL were
estimated for the surface waters receiving effluent from the on-site treatment facility used at one plant
and the publicly owned treatment facility that handles the effluent from the other plant
Concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in drinking water utility influents have been estimated to be less
than 05 ppb (EPA 1992c)
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 86 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
543 Sediment and Soil
In the sediment of a discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant located on the Chester River in
Maryland di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 12000 ppb In sediment samples
from the Chester River taken 2 km and 8 km downstream from the plant the compound was found at
concentrations of 62 and lt5 ppb respectively (Peterson and Freeman 1984) In the sediment of a
river that received industrial waste water from a specialty chemical manufacturing plant di-nshy
octylphthalate was detected at concentrations ranging from 15 to 25 ppm (Jungclaus et al 1978) At
the Dixie Caverns Landfill NPL site located in Salem Virginia di-n-octylphthalate was detected on-site at
a concentration of 80 ppm (ATSDR 1988) however the media in which this concentration was
detected was not specified Off-site sediment samples collected at the Revere Chemical Company
NPL site located in Revere Pennsylvania were found to contain 2300 ppb di-n-octylphthalate
(ATSDR 1989c)
EPA (1992c) developed estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in the sediments of surface
waters located downstream from two plants reporting releases of the compound to the TRI The
surface waters received effluents from an on-site treatment facility and a publicly owned treatment
facility Steady-state sediment concentrations were estimated to exceed 10 mgkg and possibly
gt50 mgkg downstream from the two facilities
544 Other Environmental Media
Di-n-octylphthalate is produced as a decomposition product of the pesticide dinocap (HSDB 1995)
55 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Humans are expected to be exposed to di-n-octylphthalate mainly in the workplace (HSDB 1994)
The National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted between 1981 and 1983 estimated
that 10393 workers (including 1434 women) in 1177 facilities were exposed to di-n-octylphthalate in
the workplace in 1980 (NIOSH 1993)
Exposure of the general population to di-n-octylphthalate may occur through ingestion of foods
contaminated by leaching of the compound from plastic containers transfusions of blood or other
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 82 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
53 ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
531 Transport and Partitioning
Upon release to surface waters di-n-octylphthalate is expected to partition mainly to sediments and to
suspended particulates In a pilot-scale waste-water treatment system di-n-octylphthalate partitioned
mainly to primary treatment sludge (Petrasek et al 1983) The compound strongly adsorbs to organic
matter contained in soils and sediments adsorption is probably the most important transport process
for the compound in surface waters (EPA 1979 1992c) Volatilization from surface waters is expected
to be a slow and unimportant process For example the estimated volatilization half-life from a model
river 1 meter deep with a current of 1 metersecond and a wind speed of 3 meterssecond is 13 days
(HSDB 1995) In a pilot-scale study of a typical waste-water treatment plant employing both primary
and secondary activated sludge treatment processes no di-n-octylphthalate was lost from the system by
air stripping (Petrasek et al 1983) However in a study simulating the behavior of di-n-octylphthalate
in different aquatic systems volatilization was estimated to account for up to 20 of the losses of the
compound from certain standing surface water systems characterized by long water detention times
(eg ponds lakes) especially in relatively pristine lakes where loss by biodegradation is not likely to
be important (Wolfe et al 1980) This same study suggests that in running surface waters such as
rivers di-n-octylphthalate is most likely to be lost by transport out of the system
Di-n-octylphthalate also strongly adsorbs to soils and does not undergo leaching to groundwater as
indicated by its estimated soil organic carbonwater partition coefficient (Koc) of about 19000
Volatilization from soils is not expected to be significant (HSDB 1994 Vista Chemical 1992)
Di-n-octylphthalate released to the atmosphere may partition to soils and surface waters through wet
(Ligocki et al 1985) and dry (Vista Chemical 1992) deposition processes
Di-n-octylphthalate is bioconcentrated by aquatic organisms (EPA 1992d) In a 33-day combined
terrestrial-aquatic model ecosystem study the following di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentration factors
(BCFs) were reported (1) algae - 28500 (2) daphnids - 2600 (3) fish and mosquitoes - 9400 and
(4) snails - 13600 However the half-life for the disappearance of di-n-octylphthalate from this model
system was estimated to be about 5 days as the result of metabolism of the compound An EPA
(1992d) hazard assessment stated that although di-n-octylphthalate does bioconcentrate in aquatic
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 83 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
organisms the compound is not expected to biomagnify in aquatic food chains however this citation
did not contain and does not reference any studies that provide a basis for this conclusion In
greenhouse studies using radiolabeled di-n-octylphthalate added to soils the compound was not
bioconcentrated by crop plants (BCF lt1) (EPA 1986e) In a more recent screening study that
examined the potential of contaminants contained in sewage sludge to transfer into agricultural
products on the basis of their physicalchemical properties di-n-octylphthalate was judged to have a
high potential to adsorb to soil sludge solids and plant root surfaces and a low potential for leaching
uptake and translocation by plants and transfer to animal tissues by foliage ingestion (Wild and Jones
1992)
532 Transformation and Degradation
5321 Air
The most important transformation process for di-n-octylphthalate present in the atmosphere as an
aerosol is reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals The half-life for this reaction has
been estimated to be 45-448 hours (Howard et al 1991) Actual atmospheric half-lives may be
longer since phthalate esters sorbed to wind-entrained particulates may have long atmospheric
residence times (Vista Chemical 1992) Direct photolysis in the atmosphere is not expected to be an
important process (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995)
5322 Water
Phthalate esters undergo a step-wise alkaline hydrolysis to monoesters and then to dicarboxylic acids
As a result of the relatively slow rates of this reaction at pH 6-9 and the low water solubility of di-nshy
octylphthalate chemical hydrolysis of the compound is not an environmentally important
transformation process (EPA 1992a) Hydrolytic half-lives at 25degC and pH 7 and 9 have been
estimated to be 107 and 7 years respectively (Howard et al 1991)
Biodegradation is the primary process by which phthalate esters are removed from surface waters
rates are strongly dependent on acclimation of microbial communities (EPA 1992a 1992~) Wolfe et
al (1980) predicted that biodegradation would be the most important mechanism by which di-nshy
octylphthalate would be removed from eutrophic lakes In static culture flask biodegradation screening
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 84 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
tests about 93-94 of di-n-octylphthalate was metabolized after 3 weeks only after serial subculturing
of acclimated microorganisms (Tabak et al 1981) Enzymatic hydrolysis is the mechanism used by
microbes in the aerobic biotransformation of di-n-octylphthalate The ester is hydrolyzed to soluble
intermediates presumably via a pathway producing a phthalic acid monoester (EPA 1993a) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not available Aerobic biodegradation half-lives
range from 1 to 4 weeks in surface waters and from 2 weeks to 1 year in groundwater (Howard et al
1991) Biodegradation under anaerobic conditions occurs at a slower rate (EPA 1993a) it has been
predicted that di-n-octylphthalate will accumulate in natural sediments because it is persistent under
anaerobic conditions (EPA 1992d) For example in anaerobic digester studies using diluted and
undiluted sewage treatment plant sludge between 40 and 75 of di-n-octylphthalate remained
undegraded after a 10-week incubation period (Shelton et al 1984) Anaerobic half-lives for aquatic
systems have been predicted to range from 6 months to 1 year (Howard et al 1991)
Di-n-octylphthalate may also undergo photolysis in surface waters as a result of its absorption of
electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths less than 290 nm The estimated photolytic half-life of the
compound in surface water is 144 days (EPA 1992a) Photolysis was predicted to be the most
important removal mechanism after volatilization for di-n-octylphthalate losses from oligotrophic lakes
(Wolfe et al 1980)
5323 Sediment and Soil
As discussed above aerobic biotransformation is expected to be the most important process in the
removal of di-n-octylphthalate from soils anaerobic biodegradation occurs in sediments (EPA 1992a)
However because of its persistence under anaerobic conditions di-n-octylphthalate is expected to
accumulate in sediments (EPA 1992d) Di-n-octylphthalate has been reported to undergo
biodegradation by a variety of acclimated soil microorganisms (HSDB 1995 Mathur 1974b) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not located
54 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT
As previously discussed considerable confusion exists in the literature about the monitoring data
available for di-n-octylphthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Only monitoring data that clearly
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 85 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concerned di-n-octylphthalate were included in this section of the profile data from ambiguous studies
were not included
541 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in five of seven ambient air and six of seven rainwater samples
collected during rain events that occurred in February through April 1984 in Portland Oregon Di-nshy
octylphthalate concentrations ranged from 26 to 20 ngL in rain samples and from 006 to 094 ngm3
in air samples (Ligocki et al 1985)
542 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in 4 of the urban runoff samples collected from a total of 15 cities
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at three cities at concentrations of 04-l microgL (Cole et al 1984) The
compound was found in water samples collected at four locations along the entire length of the
Mississippi River at concentrations of 24-310 ngL (DeLeon et al 1986) At the Butler Mine Tunnel
NPL Site located in Pittston Pennsylvania di-n-octylphthalate was detected in on-site oilgroundwater
samples at concentrations of ll0-792000 ppb (ATSDR 1989b) Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a
concentration of 1 ppb in a water sample collected from the discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant
located on the Chester River in Maryland (Peterson and Freeman 1984) Di-n-octylphthalate was
found at 0001-002 ppm in water samples taken from a river that received industrial waste water from
a specialty chemical manufacturing plant (Jungclaus et al 1978)
Estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in receiving waters located downstream from two plants
reporting releases of the compound to the TRI have been developed by EPA (1992c) Mean flow
concentrations of about 3-9 microgL and 7-year Ql0 low-flow concentrations of about 90-390 microgL were
estimated for the surface waters receiving effluent from the on-site treatment facility used at one plant
and the publicly owned treatment facility that handles the effluent from the other plant
Concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in drinking water utility influents have been estimated to be less
than 05 ppb (EPA 1992c)
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 86 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
543 Sediment and Soil
In the sediment of a discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant located on the Chester River in
Maryland di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 12000 ppb In sediment samples
from the Chester River taken 2 km and 8 km downstream from the plant the compound was found at
concentrations of 62 and lt5 ppb respectively (Peterson and Freeman 1984) In the sediment of a
river that received industrial waste water from a specialty chemical manufacturing plant di-nshy
octylphthalate was detected at concentrations ranging from 15 to 25 ppm (Jungclaus et al 1978) At
the Dixie Caverns Landfill NPL site located in Salem Virginia di-n-octylphthalate was detected on-site at
a concentration of 80 ppm (ATSDR 1988) however the media in which this concentration was
detected was not specified Off-site sediment samples collected at the Revere Chemical Company
NPL site located in Revere Pennsylvania were found to contain 2300 ppb di-n-octylphthalate
(ATSDR 1989c)
EPA (1992c) developed estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in the sediments of surface
waters located downstream from two plants reporting releases of the compound to the TRI The
surface waters received effluents from an on-site treatment facility and a publicly owned treatment
facility Steady-state sediment concentrations were estimated to exceed 10 mgkg and possibly
gt50 mgkg downstream from the two facilities
544 Other Environmental Media
Di-n-octylphthalate is produced as a decomposition product of the pesticide dinocap (HSDB 1995)
55 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Humans are expected to be exposed to di-n-octylphthalate mainly in the workplace (HSDB 1994)
The National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted between 1981 and 1983 estimated
that 10393 workers (including 1434 women) in 1177 facilities were exposed to di-n-octylphthalate in
the workplace in 1980 (NIOSH 1993)
Exposure of the general population to di-n-octylphthalate may occur through ingestion of foods
contaminated by leaching of the compound from plastic containers transfusions of blood or other
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 83 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
organisms the compound is not expected to biomagnify in aquatic food chains however this citation
did not contain and does not reference any studies that provide a basis for this conclusion In
greenhouse studies using radiolabeled di-n-octylphthalate added to soils the compound was not
bioconcentrated by crop plants (BCF lt1) (EPA 1986e) In a more recent screening study that
examined the potential of contaminants contained in sewage sludge to transfer into agricultural
products on the basis of their physicalchemical properties di-n-octylphthalate was judged to have a
high potential to adsorb to soil sludge solids and plant root surfaces and a low potential for leaching
uptake and translocation by plants and transfer to animal tissues by foliage ingestion (Wild and Jones
1992)
532 Transformation and Degradation
5321 Air
The most important transformation process for di-n-octylphthalate present in the atmosphere as an
aerosol is reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals The half-life for this reaction has
been estimated to be 45-448 hours (Howard et al 1991) Actual atmospheric half-lives may be
longer since phthalate esters sorbed to wind-entrained particulates may have long atmospheric
residence times (Vista Chemical 1992) Direct photolysis in the atmosphere is not expected to be an
important process (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995)
5322 Water
Phthalate esters undergo a step-wise alkaline hydrolysis to monoesters and then to dicarboxylic acids
As a result of the relatively slow rates of this reaction at pH 6-9 and the low water solubility of di-nshy
octylphthalate chemical hydrolysis of the compound is not an environmentally important
transformation process (EPA 1992a) Hydrolytic half-lives at 25degC and pH 7 and 9 have been
estimated to be 107 and 7 years respectively (Howard et al 1991)
Biodegradation is the primary process by which phthalate esters are removed from surface waters
rates are strongly dependent on acclimation of microbial communities (EPA 1992a 1992~) Wolfe et
al (1980) predicted that biodegradation would be the most important mechanism by which di-nshy
octylphthalate would be removed from eutrophic lakes In static culture flask biodegradation screening
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 84 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
tests about 93-94 of di-n-octylphthalate was metabolized after 3 weeks only after serial subculturing
of acclimated microorganisms (Tabak et al 1981) Enzymatic hydrolysis is the mechanism used by
microbes in the aerobic biotransformation of di-n-octylphthalate The ester is hydrolyzed to soluble
intermediates presumably via a pathway producing a phthalic acid monoester (EPA 1993a) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not available Aerobic biodegradation half-lives
range from 1 to 4 weeks in surface waters and from 2 weeks to 1 year in groundwater (Howard et al
1991) Biodegradation under anaerobic conditions occurs at a slower rate (EPA 1993a) it has been
predicted that di-n-octylphthalate will accumulate in natural sediments because it is persistent under
anaerobic conditions (EPA 1992d) For example in anaerobic digester studies using diluted and
undiluted sewage treatment plant sludge between 40 and 75 of di-n-octylphthalate remained
undegraded after a 10-week incubation period (Shelton et al 1984) Anaerobic half-lives for aquatic
systems have been predicted to range from 6 months to 1 year (Howard et al 1991)
Di-n-octylphthalate may also undergo photolysis in surface waters as a result of its absorption of
electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths less than 290 nm The estimated photolytic half-life of the
compound in surface water is 144 days (EPA 1992a) Photolysis was predicted to be the most
important removal mechanism after volatilization for di-n-octylphthalate losses from oligotrophic lakes
(Wolfe et al 1980)
5323 Sediment and Soil
As discussed above aerobic biotransformation is expected to be the most important process in the
removal of di-n-octylphthalate from soils anaerobic biodegradation occurs in sediments (EPA 1992a)
However because of its persistence under anaerobic conditions di-n-octylphthalate is expected to
accumulate in sediments (EPA 1992d) Di-n-octylphthalate has been reported to undergo
biodegradation by a variety of acclimated soil microorganisms (HSDB 1995 Mathur 1974b) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not located
54 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT
As previously discussed considerable confusion exists in the literature about the monitoring data
available for di-n-octylphthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Only monitoring data that clearly
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 85 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concerned di-n-octylphthalate were included in this section of the profile data from ambiguous studies
were not included
541 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in five of seven ambient air and six of seven rainwater samples
collected during rain events that occurred in February through April 1984 in Portland Oregon Di-nshy
octylphthalate concentrations ranged from 26 to 20 ngL in rain samples and from 006 to 094 ngm3
in air samples (Ligocki et al 1985)
542 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in 4 of the urban runoff samples collected from a total of 15 cities
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at three cities at concentrations of 04-l microgL (Cole et al 1984) The
compound was found in water samples collected at four locations along the entire length of the
Mississippi River at concentrations of 24-310 ngL (DeLeon et al 1986) At the Butler Mine Tunnel
NPL Site located in Pittston Pennsylvania di-n-octylphthalate was detected in on-site oilgroundwater
samples at concentrations of ll0-792000 ppb (ATSDR 1989b) Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a
concentration of 1 ppb in a water sample collected from the discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant
located on the Chester River in Maryland (Peterson and Freeman 1984) Di-n-octylphthalate was
found at 0001-002 ppm in water samples taken from a river that received industrial waste water from
a specialty chemical manufacturing plant (Jungclaus et al 1978)
Estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in receiving waters located downstream from two plants
reporting releases of the compound to the TRI have been developed by EPA (1992c) Mean flow
concentrations of about 3-9 microgL and 7-year Ql0 low-flow concentrations of about 90-390 microgL were
estimated for the surface waters receiving effluent from the on-site treatment facility used at one plant
and the publicly owned treatment facility that handles the effluent from the other plant
Concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in drinking water utility influents have been estimated to be less
than 05 ppb (EPA 1992c)
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 86 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
543 Sediment and Soil
In the sediment of a discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant located on the Chester River in
Maryland di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 12000 ppb In sediment samples
from the Chester River taken 2 km and 8 km downstream from the plant the compound was found at
concentrations of 62 and lt5 ppb respectively (Peterson and Freeman 1984) In the sediment of a
river that received industrial waste water from a specialty chemical manufacturing plant di-nshy
octylphthalate was detected at concentrations ranging from 15 to 25 ppm (Jungclaus et al 1978) At
the Dixie Caverns Landfill NPL site located in Salem Virginia di-n-octylphthalate was detected on-site at
a concentration of 80 ppm (ATSDR 1988) however the media in which this concentration was
detected was not specified Off-site sediment samples collected at the Revere Chemical Company
NPL site located in Revere Pennsylvania were found to contain 2300 ppb di-n-octylphthalate
(ATSDR 1989c)
EPA (1992c) developed estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in the sediments of surface
waters located downstream from two plants reporting releases of the compound to the TRI The
surface waters received effluents from an on-site treatment facility and a publicly owned treatment
facility Steady-state sediment concentrations were estimated to exceed 10 mgkg and possibly
gt50 mgkg downstream from the two facilities
544 Other Environmental Media
Di-n-octylphthalate is produced as a decomposition product of the pesticide dinocap (HSDB 1995)
55 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Humans are expected to be exposed to di-n-octylphthalate mainly in the workplace (HSDB 1994)
The National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted between 1981 and 1983 estimated
that 10393 workers (including 1434 women) in 1177 facilities were exposed to di-n-octylphthalate in
the workplace in 1980 (NIOSH 1993)
Exposure of the general population to di-n-octylphthalate may occur through ingestion of foods
contaminated by leaching of the compound from plastic containers transfusions of blood or other
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 84 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
tests about 93-94 of di-n-octylphthalate was metabolized after 3 weeks only after serial subculturing
of acclimated microorganisms (Tabak et al 1981) Enzymatic hydrolysis is the mechanism used by
microbes in the aerobic biotransformation of di-n-octylphthalate The ester is hydrolyzed to soluble
intermediates presumably via a pathway producing a phthalic acid monoester (EPA 1993a) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not available Aerobic biodegradation half-lives
range from 1 to 4 weeks in surface waters and from 2 weeks to 1 year in groundwater (Howard et al
1991) Biodegradation under anaerobic conditions occurs at a slower rate (EPA 1993a) it has been
predicted that di-n-octylphthalate will accumulate in natural sediments because it is persistent under
anaerobic conditions (EPA 1992d) For example in anaerobic digester studies using diluted and
undiluted sewage treatment plant sludge between 40 and 75 of di-n-octylphthalate remained
undegraded after a 10-week incubation period (Shelton et al 1984) Anaerobic half-lives for aquatic
systems have been predicted to range from 6 months to 1 year (Howard et al 1991)
Di-n-octylphthalate may also undergo photolysis in surface waters as a result of its absorption of
electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths less than 290 nm The estimated photolytic half-life of the
compound in surface water is 144 days (EPA 1992a) Photolysis was predicted to be the most
important removal mechanism after volatilization for di-n-octylphthalate losses from oligotrophic lakes
(Wolfe et al 1980)
5323 Sediment and Soil
As discussed above aerobic biotransformation is expected to be the most important process in the
removal of di-n-octylphthalate from soils anaerobic biodegradation occurs in sediments (EPA 1992a)
However because of its persistence under anaerobic conditions di-n-octylphthalate is expected to
accumulate in sediments (EPA 1992d) Di-n-octylphthalate has been reported to undergo
biodegradation by a variety of acclimated soil microorganisms (HSDB 1995 Mathur 1974b) however
data on the identity of biodegradation products were not located
54 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT
As previously discussed considerable confusion exists in the literature about the monitoring data
available for di-n-octylphthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Only monitoring data that clearly
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 85 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concerned di-n-octylphthalate were included in this section of the profile data from ambiguous studies
were not included
541 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in five of seven ambient air and six of seven rainwater samples
collected during rain events that occurred in February through April 1984 in Portland Oregon Di-nshy
octylphthalate concentrations ranged from 26 to 20 ngL in rain samples and from 006 to 094 ngm3
in air samples (Ligocki et al 1985)
542 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in 4 of the urban runoff samples collected from a total of 15 cities
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at three cities at concentrations of 04-l microgL (Cole et al 1984) The
compound was found in water samples collected at four locations along the entire length of the
Mississippi River at concentrations of 24-310 ngL (DeLeon et al 1986) At the Butler Mine Tunnel
NPL Site located in Pittston Pennsylvania di-n-octylphthalate was detected in on-site oilgroundwater
samples at concentrations of ll0-792000 ppb (ATSDR 1989b) Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a
concentration of 1 ppb in a water sample collected from the discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant
located on the Chester River in Maryland (Peterson and Freeman 1984) Di-n-octylphthalate was
found at 0001-002 ppm in water samples taken from a river that received industrial waste water from
a specialty chemical manufacturing plant (Jungclaus et al 1978)
Estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in receiving waters located downstream from two plants
reporting releases of the compound to the TRI have been developed by EPA (1992c) Mean flow
concentrations of about 3-9 microgL and 7-year Ql0 low-flow concentrations of about 90-390 microgL were
estimated for the surface waters receiving effluent from the on-site treatment facility used at one plant
and the publicly owned treatment facility that handles the effluent from the other plant
Concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in drinking water utility influents have been estimated to be less
than 05 ppb (EPA 1992c)
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 86 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
543 Sediment and Soil
In the sediment of a discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant located on the Chester River in
Maryland di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 12000 ppb In sediment samples
from the Chester River taken 2 km and 8 km downstream from the plant the compound was found at
concentrations of 62 and lt5 ppb respectively (Peterson and Freeman 1984) In the sediment of a
river that received industrial waste water from a specialty chemical manufacturing plant di-nshy
octylphthalate was detected at concentrations ranging from 15 to 25 ppm (Jungclaus et al 1978) At
the Dixie Caverns Landfill NPL site located in Salem Virginia di-n-octylphthalate was detected on-site at
a concentration of 80 ppm (ATSDR 1988) however the media in which this concentration was
detected was not specified Off-site sediment samples collected at the Revere Chemical Company
NPL site located in Revere Pennsylvania were found to contain 2300 ppb di-n-octylphthalate
(ATSDR 1989c)
EPA (1992c) developed estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in the sediments of surface
waters located downstream from two plants reporting releases of the compound to the TRI The
surface waters received effluents from an on-site treatment facility and a publicly owned treatment
facility Steady-state sediment concentrations were estimated to exceed 10 mgkg and possibly
gt50 mgkg downstream from the two facilities
544 Other Environmental Media
Di-n-octylphthalate is produced as a decomposition product of the pesticide dinocap (HSDB 1995)
55 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Humans are expected to be exposed to di-n-octylphthalate mainly in the workplace (HSDB 1994)
The National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted between 1981 and 1983 estimated
that 10393 workers (including 1434 women) in 1177 facilities were exposed to di-n-octylphthalate in
the workplace in 1980 (NIOSH 1993)
Exposure of the general population to di-n-octylphthalate may occur through ingestion of foods
contaminated by leaching of the compound from plastic containers transfusions of blood or other
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 85 5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
concerned di-n-octylphthalate were included in this section of the profile data from ambiguous studies
were not included
541 Air
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in five of seven ambient air and six of seven rainwater samples
collected during rain events that occurred in February through April 1984 in Portland Oregon Di-nshy
octylphthalate concentrations ranged from 26 to 20 ngL in rain samples and from 006 to 094 ngm3
in air samples (Ligocki et al 1985)
542 Water
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected in 4 of the urban runoff samples collected from a total of 15 cities
Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at three cities at concentrations of 04-l microgL (Cole et al 1984) The
compound was found in water samples collected at four locations along the entire length of the
Mississippi River at concentrations of 24-310 ngL (DeLeon et al 1986) At the Butler Mine Tunnel
NPL Site located in Pittston Pennsylvania di-n-octylphthalate was detected in on-site oilgroundwater
samples at concentrations of ll0-792000 ppb (ATSDR 1989b) Di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a
concentration of 1 ppb in a water sample collected from the discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant
located on the Chester River in Maryland (Peterson and Freeman 1984) Di-n-octylphthalate was
found at 0001-002 ppm in water samples taken from a river that received industrial waste water from
a specialty chemical manufacturing plant (Jungclaus et al 1978)
Estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in receiving waters located downstream from two plants
reporting releases of the compound to the TRI have been developed by EPA (1992c) Mean flow
concentrations of about 3-9 microgL and 7-year Ql0 low-flow concentrations of about 90-390 microgL were
estimated for the surface waters receiving effluent from the on-site treatment facility used at one plant
and the publicly owned treatment facility that handles the effluent from the other plant
Concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in drinking water utility influents have been estimated to be less
than 05 ppb (EPA 1992c)
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 86 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
543 Sediment and Soil
In the sediment of a discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant located on the Chester River in
Maryland di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 12000 ppb In sediment samples
from the Chester River taken 2 km and 8 km downstream from the plant the compound was found at
concentrations of 62 and lt5 ppb respectively (Peterson and Freeman 1984) In the sediment of a
river that received industrial waste water from a specialty chemical manufacturing plant di-nshy
octylphthalate was detected at concentrations ranging from 15 to 25 ppm (Jungclaus et al 1978) At
the Dixie Caverns Landfill NPL site located in Salem Virginia di-n-octylphthalate was detected on-site at
a concentration of 80 ppm (ATSDR 1988) however the media in which this concentration was
detected was not specified Off-site sediment samples collected at the Revere Chemical Company
NPL site located in Revere Pennsylvania were found to contain 2300 ppb di-n-octylphthalate
(ATSDR 1989c)
EPA (1992c) developed estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in the sediments of surface
waters located downstream from two plants reporting releases of the compound to the TRI The
surface waters received effluents from an on-site treatment facility and a publicly owned treatment
facility Steady-state sediment concentrations were estimated to exceed 10 mgkg and possibly
gt50 mgkg downstream from the two facilities
544 Other Environmental Media
Di-n-octylphthalate is produced as a decomposition product of the pesticide dinocap (HSDB 1995)
55 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Humans are expected to be exposed to di-n-octylphthalate mainly in the workplace (HSDB 1994)
The National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted between 1981 and 1983 estimated
that 10393 workers (including 1434 women) in 1177 facilities were exposed to di-n-octylphthalate in
the workplace in 1980 (NIOSH 1993)
Exposure of the general population to di-n-octylphthalate may occur through ingestion of foods
contaminated by leaching of the compound from plastic containers transfusions of blood or other
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 86 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
543 Sediment and Soil
In the sediment of a discharge pond of a phthalate ester plant located on the Chester River in
Maryland di-n-octylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 12000 ppb In sediment samples
from the Chester River taken 2 km and 8 km downstream from the plant the compound was found at
concentrations of 62 and lt5 ppb respectively (Peterson and Freeman 1984) In the sediment of a
river that received industrial waste water from a specialty chemical manufacturing plant di-nshy
octylphthalate was detected at concentrations ranging from 15 to 25 ppm (Jungclaus et al 1978) At
the Dixie Caverns Landfill NPL site located in Salem Virginia di-n-octylphthalate was detected on-site at
a concentration of 80 ppm (ATSDR 1988) however the media in which this concentration was
detected was not specified Off-site sediment samples collected at the Revere Chemical Company
NPL site located in Revere Pennsylvania were found to contain 2300 ppb di-n-octylphthalate
(ATSDR 1989c)
EPA (1992c) developed estimates of di-n-octylphthalate concentrations in the sediments of surface
waters located downstream from two plants reporting releases of the compound to the TRI The
surface waters received effluents from an on-site treatment facility and a publicly owned treatment
facility Steady-state sediment concentrations were estimated to exceed 10 mgkg and possibly
gt50 mgkg downstream from the two facilities
544 Other Environmental Media
Di-n-octylphthalate is produced as a decomposition product of the pesticide dinocap (HSDB 1995)
55 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Humans are expected to be exposed to di-n-octylphthalate mainly in the workplace (HSDB 1994)
The National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted between 1981 and 1983 estimated
that 10393 workers (including 1434 women) in 1177 facilities were exposed to di-n-octylphthalate in
the workplace in 1980 (NIOSH 1993)
Exposure of the general population to di-n-octylphthalate may occur through ingestion of foods
contaminated by leaching of the compound from plastic containers transfusions of blood or other
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 87
5 POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
fluids through medical tubing ingestion of aquatic organisms that have bioconcentrated the compound
and consumption of contaminated drinking water (EPA 1992c HSDB 1995) An additional potential
source of human exposure is contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites For example
di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in on-site sediment and groundwater samples and off-site
sediment samples collected at NPL hazardous waste sites The human exposure pathways of concern
at these sites include ingestion of contaminated groundwater and sediment (ATSDR 1988 1989b
1989c) Since data are not available on the dermal absorption of di-n-octylphthalate it is not known
whether dermal contact with di-n-octylphthalate at hazardous waste sites would represent an exposure
pathway of concern
In an early report of the 1982 annual results of the National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS)
a compound identified as di-n-octylphthalate was reportedly detected in 31 of the composite human
adipose tissue samples taken in the various regions of the United States that year Concentrations in
lipid ranged from below the level of detection (9 ngsample) to a maximum of 850 ngg (EPA 1986d)
However a later report of the 1982 results stated that the chemical detected was not di-n-octylphthalate
but was actually diethylhexyl phthalate (EPA 1989b)
56 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Patients receiving regular dialysis on a kidney machine or receiving blood transfusions may be the
populations with the highest potential exposure to di-n-octylphthalate Workers in industries that
produce or use plastics especially materials processed at high temperatures are also expected to have
potentially high exposure to di-n-octylphthalate especially via inhalation of the volatilized plasticizer
Members of the general population living in the vicinity of industrial facilities that manufacture or
process the compound or plastic materials containing the compound as well as individuals living near
hazardous waste sites known to be contaminated with di-n-octylphthalate are also expected to have
potentially high exposures through contact with contaminated environmental media (HSDB 1995)
57 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA as amended directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with
the Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of di-n-octylphthalate is available Where adequate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 88 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
information is not available ATSDR in conjunction with the NTP is required to assure the initiation
of a program of research designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing
methods to determine such health effects) of di-n-octylphthalate
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR NTP and EPA They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled In the future the identified data needs will
be evaluated and prioritized and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed
571 Identification of Data Needs
Physical and Chemical Properties The physical and chemical properties of di-n-octylphthalate are
sufficiently well defined to allow assessments of the environmental fate of the
compound to be made Therefore no additional information is needed a this time
Production ImportExport Use Release and Disposal Because of the general
confusion in the literature about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters historical information about
the production and importexport of di-n-octylphthalate is not readily available These values generally
must be estimated as a percentage of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate production or importexport The
compound is used principally as a plasticizer additive to plastics and PVC resins It is also used as a
dye carrier in plastics production and as a chemical intermediate (EPA 1993a HSDB 1995 Mannsville
Chemical Products Corporation 1989 Sittig 1991) Limited information is available about releases of
di-n-octylphthalate to environmental media Even the TRI data which comprise the most current
information available contain errors as a result of the nomenclature confusion (EPA 1993a Vista
Chemical 1992) Data are available about the disposal and regulatory status of the compound (see
Chapters 4 and 7) More information on the production and releases of di-n-octylphthalate is needed
to estimate potential exposure to the compound
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 42 USC Section
11023 industries are required to submit substance release and off-site transfer information to the EPA
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) which contains this information for 1993 became available in
May of 1995 This database will be updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 89 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
facilities and emissions However di-n-octylphthalate was withdrawn from the TRI effective in 1993
(EPA 1995h)
Environmental Fate Di-n-octylphthalate partitions primarily to soils and sediment upon release to
the environment The compound is expected to be strongly sorbed to soil and sediment particulates
therefore it should have limited mobility (EPA 1979 1992c) Biodegradation half-lives of l-4 weeks
have been estimated for aerobic surface waters and soils Biodegradation also takes place in
sediments half-lives under anaerobic conditions have been estimated to range from of 6 months to
1 year (Howard et al 1991) The compound may also undergo photolysis in surface waters (estimated
half-life of 144 days) and photooxidation in the atmosphere (estimated half-life of about 5-45 hours)
(Howard et al 1991) Di-n-octylphthalate may persist in sediments as a result of its limited rate of
biotransformation and preferential partitioning to this medium
However although degradation is known to occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions data
are not available on the identity of degradation products Because the limited studies on the
mechanisms of injury from di-n-octylphthalate suggest that mono-n-octylphthalate is the proximate
toxicant it is important to know whether the reduction of di-n-octylphthalate is coupled with the
accumulation of mono-n-octylphthalate The environmental fate of di-n-octylphthalate and its
metabolites is not sufficiently understood to allow assessments of its exposure potential to be made
Additional data are needed on the identify and fate of degradation products of di-n-octylphthalate No
additional information is needed about the transport and partitioning of the compound at this time
Bioavailability from Environmental Media No information was found regarding the
absorption of di-n-octylphthalate by humans or laboratory animals following inhalation or dermal
exposures No information is available about absorption following oral exposure in humans However
indirect evidence from animal studies suggests that the compound is readily absorbed by this route (Albro
and Moore 1974 Oishi 1990) Additional information is needed on the absorption of di-n-octylphthalate
as a result of inhalation of contaminated air ingestion of contaminated food and water and dermal
contact with contaminated soils and sediments
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 90 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Food Chain Bioaccumulation Di-n-octylphthalate bioconcentrates in aquatic organisms
However as a result of metabolism of the compound biomagnification in aquatic food chains does not
occur (EPA 1992d) It appears that the compound is not bioconcentrated by terrestrial plants or
animals or biomagnified in terrestrial food chains (EPA 1986e Wild and Jones 1992) However the
Wild and Jones (1992) study is limited to mathematical modeling results Thus only limited data are
available regarding the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of di-n-octylphthalate and the potential
for human exposure resulting from the bioaccumulation of the compound is not well understood
Therefore additional data are needed to validate the Wild and Jones (1992) model Also an
estimation of animal uptake from soil ingestion is needed to support this study
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media Reliable monitoring data for the levels of di-nshy
octylphthalate in contaminated media at hazardous waste sites are needed so that the information
obtained on levels of di-n-octylphthalate in the environment can be used in combination with the
known body burden of di-n-octylphthalate to assess the potential risk of adverse health effects in
populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites Di-n-octylphthalate has been detected in
ambient air rain surface water groundwater and sediment However as a result of the confusion
about the nomenclature for octylphthalate esters much of the historical monitoring data available
actually pertain to the branched isomer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Vista Chemical 1992) Therefore
little current information specific to the n-octyl isomer is available regarding concentrations of the
compound in foods drinking water and environmental media particularly with respect to media at
hazardous waste sites The lack of monitoring data precludes the estimation of human exposure via
intake of or contact with contaminated media
Exposure Levels in Humans This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct
health studies on these populations Di-n-octylphthalate has historically been reported to have been
found in human adipose tissue (EPA 1986d) However more recent information indicates that the
compound detected was actually the branched di(Zethylhexy1) isomer (EPA 1989b) Additional
information on the concentrations of di-n-octylphthalate in human tissues and fluids parficularly for
populations living near hazardous waste sites is needed to assess potential human exposure to the
compound
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE 91 5 POTENETIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
Exposure Registries No exposure registries for di-n-octylphthalate were located This substance
is not currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National
Exposure Registry The substance will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made
for subregistries to be established The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related
to exposure to this substance
572 On-going Studies
No information was found in the available literature concerning on-going studies dealing with the
environmental fate or human exposure potential of di-n-octylphthalate