3.23 unfinished naophorous statue the man is wearing a206 late period, ptolemaic and roman periods...

3
Late Period, Ptolemaic and Roman Periods 206 3.23 Unfinished naophorous statue Reddish brown quartzite. Late Period, late Dynasty 26 or Dynasty 27, c. 550 – 400 BC. H. 24.7 cm. Base: H. 3.7 cm, W. 7.5 cm, D. 14.6 cm. This small statue belongs to a type which originated in the New Kingdom but became particularly popular in the Late Period. The owner, who can be shown either kneeling or standing, is holding an open shrine of a deity between his outstretched arms. In the New King- dom this type of statue can be found in temples and tombs alike, but in the Late Period it is mainly asso- ciated with temples, the deity depicted in the naos being the god or goddess in whose temple the statue was erected. 1 The present example is unfinished. It is made of quartzite, a very hard stone, difficult to work. The kneeling figure of the owner itself has been fully carved and the details of the head have been rendered quite carefully, but the surface of the stone is rather uneven and has not yet received the final polish which is so characteristic of high quality Egyptian statues. Details such as the hemline of the costume also lack finesse. The most obvious signs of the unfinished state of the piece, however, are the absence of any inscriptions on the base and the back pillar, and the fact that there is no deity within the naos. This is somewhat surprising since one would expect that the sculptor would at least have indicated the open front of the shrine and the rough outlines of a divine figure. The explanation may be that he did not intend to carve an open naos with a deity, but rather a solid block decorated in relief on the front with the façade of the temple of the goddess Neith, as is the case on a statue in Florence and some other examples, all dating to the same period as our piece. 2 This kind of decoration would have been added at a later stage in the production, along with the inscriptions. If this assump- tion is correct, the statue may once have stood in the temple of Neith in Sais. The naos itself is supported on a pillar resting on the base of the statue, a feature regu- larly found in Late Period naophorous statues. The owner is dressed in a long garment which is wrapped around the chest, high under the arms, and reaches down nearly as far as the ankles. This appears to be a simplified representation of what used to be called the “Persian wrap”, a fashion which was in fact intro- duced in the later years of the 26th Dynasty, well before the Persian conquerors who ruled Egypt as the 27th Dynasty arrived on the scene. 3 The man is wearing a plain bagwig revealing the ears, which have been care- fully modelled, although they are perhaps slightly too small and placed a little too high. The facial features have also been rendered with great care: the face itself is round, with full cheeks and a double chin. The eye- brows show a gentle curve and are quite close to the eyes, which are large and almond-shaped, with a dou- ble sculpted line marking the eyelids. The nose is rather small and the philtrum is indicated below; the mouth displays a faint smile. The hands and feet are perhaps a bit clumsy, but the finger and toenails have been ren- dered with care. The costume worn by the owner and his facial features date the statue to the later years of the Saite Period or the Persian Period. Good comparisons include the statue of Psamtik-sa-Neith in Philadelphia 4 from the last decades of the 26th Dynasty and an anonymous head and torso in Vienna 5 from Dynasty 27. JvD 1 For the symbolism of naophorous statues see our no. 2.41. 2 Florence, Museo archeologico, No. 1784; R. el-Sayed, Docu- ments relatifs à Saïs et ses divinités (Cairo 1975), 129–135, Pl. XIX. Cf. B.V. Bothmer, Egyptian Sculpture of the Late Period, 700 BC to AD 100 (Brooklyn 1960), 90 (comment on No. 72). 3 S.B. Shubert, “Realistic Currents in Portrait Sculpture of the Saite and Persian Periods in Egypt”, JSSEA 19 (1989), 27 – 47, Pls. 9 – 20. 4 E.R. Russmann, in D.P. Silverman (ed.), Searching for Ancient Egypt (Dallas 1997), 146–147, No. 45. 5 W. Seipel, Gott, Mensch, Pharao: Viertausend Jahre Menschen- bild in der Skulptur des Alten Ägypten (Vienna 1992), 402 – 403, No. 162.

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Late Period, Ptolemaic and Roman Periods206

    3.23 Unfinished naophorous statue

    Reddish brown quartzite.Late Period, late Dynasty 26 or Dynasty 27, c. 550 – 400 BC.H. 24.7 cm. Base: H. 3.7 cm, W. 7.5 cm, D. 14.6 cm.

    This small statue belongs to a type which originated inthe New Kingdom but became particularly popular inthe Late Period. The owner, who can be shown eitherkneeling or standing, is holding an open shrine of adeity between his outstretched arms. In the New King-dom this type of statue can be found in temples andtombs alike, but in the Late Period it is mainly asso-ciated with temples, the deity depicted in the naos beingthe god or goddess in whose temple the statue was erected.1

    The present example is unfinished. It is made ofquartzite, a very hard stone, difficult to work. Thekneeling figure of the owner itself has been fully carvedand the details of the head have been rendered quitecarefully, but the surface of the stone is rather unevenand has not yet received the final polish which is socharacteristic of high quality Egyptian statues. Detailssuch as the hemline of the costume also lack finesse.The most obvious signs of the unfinished state of thepiece, however, are the absence of any inscriptions onthe base and the back pillar, and the fact that there is nodeity within the naos. This is somewhat surprising sinceone would expect that the sculptor would at least haveindicated the open front of the shrine and the roughoutlines of a divine figure. The explanation may be thathe did not intend to carve an open naos with a deity, butrather a solid block decorated in relief on the front withthe façade of the temple of the goddess Neith, as is thecase on a statue in Florence and some other examples,all dating to the same period as our piece.2 This kind ofdecoration would have been added at a later stage in theproduction, along with the inscriptions. If this assump-tion is correct, the statue may once have stood in thetemple of Neith in Sais. The naos itself is supported ona pillar resting on the base of the statue, a feature regu-larly found in Late Period naophorous statues.The owner is dressed in a long garment which iswrapped around the chest, high under the arms, andreaches down nearly as far as the ankles. This appears tobe a simplified representation of what used to be calledthe “Persian wrap”, a fashion which was in fact intro-duced in the later years of the 26th Dynasty, well beforethe Persian conquerors who ruled Egypt as the 27th

    Dynasty arrived on the scene.3 The man is wearing aplain bagwig revealing the ears, which have been care-fully modelled, although they are perhaps slightly toosmall and placed a little too high. The facial featureshave also been rendered with great care: the face itself isround, with full cheeks and a double chin. The eye-brows show a gentle curve and are quite close to theeyes, which are large and almond-shaped, with a dou-ble sculpted line marking the eyelids. The nose is rathersmall and the philtrum is indicated below; the mouthdisplays a faint smile. The hands and feet are perhaps abit clumsy, but the finger and toenails have been ren-dered with care.The costume worn by the owner and his facial featuresdate the statue to the later years of the Saite Period orthe Persian Period. Good comparisons include the statue of Psamtik-sa-Neith in Philadelphia4 from thelast decades of the 26th Dynasty and an anonymoushead and torso in Vienna5 from Dynasty 27.

    JvD

    1 For the symbolism of naophorous statues see our no. 2.41.2 Florence, Museo archeologico, No. 1784; R. el-Sayed, Docu-

    ments relatifs à Saïs et ses divinités (Cairo 1975), 129 – 135, Pl. XIX. Cf. B.V. Bothmer, Egyptian Sculpture of the Late Period, 700 BC to AD 100 (Brooklyn 1960), 90 (comment onNo. 72).

    3 S.B. Shubert, “Realistic Currents in Portrait Sculpture of theSaite and Persian Periods in Egypt”, JSSEA 19 (1989), 27 – 47,Pls. 9 – 20.

    4 E.R. Russmann, in D.P. Silverman (ed.), Searching for AncientEgypt (Dallas 1997), 146 – 147, No. 45.

    5 W. Seipel, Gott, Mensch, Pharao: Viertausend Jahre Menschen-bild in der Skulptur des Alten Ägypten (Vienna 1992), 402 – 403,No. 162.

    01 Part 1-3/S. 1-249/korr.drh 04.08.2006 16:03 Uhr Seite 206

  • Late Period, Ptolemaic and Roman Periods 207

    01 Part 1-3/S. 1-249/korr.drh 04.08.2006 16:03 Uhr Seite 207

  • Late Period, Ptolemaic and Roman Periods208

    01 Part 1-3/S. 1-249/korr.drh 04.08.2006 16:03 Uhr Seite 208