25. evaluation of major determinants.full

Upload: tjprc-publications

Post on 08-Aug-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    1/14

    International Journal of Agricultural

    Science and Research (IJASR)

    ISSN 2250-0057

    Vol. 3, Issue 3, Aug 2013, 197-210

    TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

    EVALUATION OF MAJOR DETERMINANTS IN SOIL NUTRIENTS AMELIORATE FOR

    PRODUCTION OF CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENT CURCUMIN IN RHIZOMES

    OF CURCUMA LONGA L.

    AKHILESHWAR KUMAR SRIVASTAVA1, RAGHVENDRA RAMAN MISHRA

    2, MALLIKA TEWARI

    3,

    HARI SHANKAR SHUKLA4

    & BIJOY KRISHNA ROY5

    1,5Department of Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

    2,3,4Department of Surgical Oncology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

    ABSTRACT

    The response to soil nutrients on the production of curcumin (cancer chemopreventive agent) in turmeric rhizomes

    was studied. Four different sampling sites in northern-India with variable soil properties were selected. Curcumin

    production in relation to soil physico-chemical properties was assessed. The variations in curcumin amount depended on

    soil pH, level of nutrients (Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Zn, N, P, K), and organic C in soil. The curcumin amount in turmeric from

    Varanasi district (9.03%) was highest followed by site at Darbhanga (6.04%), Mirzapur (4.47%), and Allahabad (4.43%).

    The results revealed that curcumin content enhanced corresponding to the favourable pH (7.1) and high nutrient levels in

    soil. Among the soil nutrients, N, K, and total NPK showed positive and significant correlation with curcumin production.

    The level of N, K, and combined NPK in the soil were the major determinants of curcumin production.

    KEYWORDS: Turmeric, Curcumin, Nutrients, HPLC, Physico-Chemical Properties of Soil, Correlation Coefficient

    INTRODUCTION

    India has been the great repository of medicinal plants since long (Chattopadhyay et al., 2004). Turmeric

    (Curcuma longa) is broadly used in disciplines of Ayurveda, Unani and Siddha (Ammon et al., 1991; Eigneret al., 1999).

    The plant belongs to family Zingiberaceae, and originally reported from South and East India and Indonesia.

    Now-a-days, India is the largest turmeric producer, exporter, and consumer in the world (Kamble et al., 2011). Presently,

    turmeric has been used in many countries as the most favourite spice (Ammon et al., 1991; Ishimine et al., 2004).

    Nonetheless, curcumin and volatile oils in the rhizome have proved anti-inflammatory, antimutagen, anticancerous,

    antibacterial, anti-oxidant, anti-fungal, antiparasitic, and detox properties (Ammon et al., 1991; Osawa et al., 1995). Some

    other active ingredients of turmeric also enhance the function of liver and kidney, and reduce biliary, diabetic and hepatic

    disorders (Ammon et al., 1991). Besides above, anticancerous properties of curcumin have been proven experimentally on

    different cell lines and animals with different levels of carcinogenesis in skin, breast and gastrointestinal tracks (Rao et al.,

    1995; Huang et al., 1994; Huang et al., 1998; Aggarwal et al., 2003).

    Looking at spread of cancer and the implication of turmeric as the remedial measure, emphasis has been on high

    production of turmeric. There is a lack of information on the agronomic aspects of turmeric production in general, and the

    weather relationship in particular. The report on status of scientific agronomic practices for turmeric farming is also

    meagre relative to other turmeric producing countries.

    Many factors that play vital role in growth/development of turmeric rhizome and leaves are nutrition, cultivation

    practices, genotype, and the environment factors (Gregory, 1988; Loomis and Amthor, 1999; Azam-Ali and Squire, 2002).

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    2/14

    198 Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, Raghvendra Raman Mishra,Mallika Tewari, Hari Shankar Shukla & Bijoy Krishna Roy

    Besides above, growth yield and the quality of cultivars also depend on the soil type, and its nutrients levels (Oya, 1972;

    Oya et al., 1977). Therefore, it seems imperative to look for the type of soil and the levels of nutrients for high yield

    cultivars (Oya, 1972). Kandiannan et al. (2002) reported thatplant requires an annual average rainfall (640 to 4200 mm)

    and the annual mean temperature of 18.2 to 27.4

    0

    C. However, the requirement of optimum temperature is in 25-35

    0

    Crange for sprouting of turmeric rhizome. Although the luxuriant growth of turmeric occurs in shades, larger rhizomes are

    produced in the open field exposed to sunlight (Ridley, 1912).

    Many agronomists earlier employed correlation path and cluster analyses to study the soil type that favoured high

    quality turmeric yield (Chenchaiah et al., 2002; Sarma et al., 2003; Nybe et al., 2008) based on the rhizome yield and soil

    factors, but failed to explain the uptake of soil nutrients that favours plant growth/metabolism. Among the metabolites,

    curcumin is the important one in turmeric rhizome, and its amount increased significantly under Fe deficiency, and it also,

    reciprocates with the enhanced levels of soil organic acids (Dixit and Srivastava, 2000). Looking at the medicinal potential

    and the numerous pharmaceutical aspects of curcumin, it seems imperative to increase its yield and also to develop the

    desired turmeric traits.

    In agricultural fields the elimination of soil micronutrients leads to soil deficiency in many countries. The

    deficiency of iron is most common to calcareous or alkaline soils. The application of N, P, and K fertilisers at higher doses

    also decreased the curcumin amount in rhizomes, but the graded dose of N, P, and K increased (Rao et al., 1975;

    Mohanbabu and Muthuswamy, 1984; Ahmed et al., 1988; Meenakshi et al., 2001). Therefore, we attempted to study the

    distribution pattern of soil micronutrients levels in North-India keeping in views the possible improvement of turmeric

    cultivation, and also the curcumin contents.

    Curcumin is easily extracted from the turmeric rhizome by the solvent extraction method, and its amount analysed

    by using HPLC (Balashanmugan, 1991). The study was conducted to determine the rhizome curcumin content in relation

    to soil organic and inorganic nutrients levels in soils from different locations of North-India.

    MATERIAL AND METHODS

    Study Site

    The turmeric rhizomes were collected from four different locations at district of Varanasi, Allahabad, Mirzapur

    (Uttar Pradesh) and Darbhanga (Bihar). All the locations display different geographical status and soils properties.

    Varanasi is located in the eastern part of the state of Uttar Pradesh (82 56E - 83 03E longitude and 25 14N -

    25 23.5N latitude) in the middle Ganges valley of north India. This site is enriched with the fertile gangetic alluvial soil.

    Allahabad in the southern part of Uttar Pradesh state, (2526 N latitude and 8150 E, longitude), stands at the confluence

    of the river Ganga and Yamuna with the intermediate alluvial soil. Mirzapur is located between 25.15N latitude and

    82.58E longitude in the southern part of the state dominated by the Vindhyan alluvial soil. Darbhanga is located in the

    north Bihar (26.17N latitude and 85.9E longitude) enriched with calcareous and alluvial soil.

    Sample Collection

    Soils samples are collected randomly at 5 locations of each site at 10 meter intervals from 0-10 cm depth and kept

    separately. All the samples were brought to the laboratory and dried at 800C, and 100 g of the dried soil was sieved (mesh,

    2 mm).

    The turmeric rhizomes were collected from the agricultural field of each location, and dried at 500C (48 h) and

    powdered by grinding for HPLC analysis.

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    3/14

    Evaluation of Major Determinants in Soil Nutrients Ameliorate for Production of 199Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Curcumin in Rhizomes ofCurcuma longaL.

    Determination of Soil pH

    Soil pH was determined in the 1:1 soil-water mixture using the glass electrode (Peech, 1965).

    Determination of Nutrients Concentration

    Metal Analysis

    Soil (1.0 gm) sample was placed in beaker and added with 7.0 ml ternary acid (HNO3:H2SO4:HClO4; 5:1:1), and

    incubated (10-12 h). After digestion, the samples were diluted in 50 ml double distilled water and filtered. Metal

    concentration in samples as analysed by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer model 2380) against

    standard metal solutions. Metal concentration is expressed in g/g soil dry wt.

    N, P, and K Analysis

    The nutrients N, P, K, were determined separately for N by micro-Kjeldahl procedure (Peach and Tracey 1956), P

    was measured after digestion with ternary acid (HNO3/H2SO4/HClO4; 10/1/4, V/V) and assayed by phosphomolybdic acidblue assay (Jackson, 1958). K was determined by Flame photometer (Mediflame 127) following the method of Jackson

    (1958).

    Estimation of Organic Carbon

    Soil organic carbon was determined by Walkley and Blacks rapid titration method (Jackson, 1958). Air-dried soil

    sample (1.0 g) was taken in 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask and added with K2Cr2O7 (10 ml) and H2SO4 (20 ml). The mixture was

    swirled until soil and reagents fully mixed. After 30 min, 200 ml of double distilled water was added. Organic carbon was

    determined by titration with 0.5N FeSO4 solution containing 3-4 drops of O-phenapthroline as the indicator. Organic

    carbon was calculated as:

    Organic carbon = (Meq K2Cr2O7-Meq FeSO4) 0.003 100 f / weight of soil (gm)

    Where f = 1.33

    HPLC Analysis

    The HPLC model, HP C-18 column (1250 4.6 mm), and Millipore (0.454 m) membrane filter was used for

    filtration. The injection system used 20 l sample loop. The solvents (methanol and acetonitrile) were from Spectrochem

    laboratories (Mumbai, India). Water for HPLC was purified by the Milli Q water purification (Synergy, Bangalore, India).

    The curcumin standard was purchased from MP Biomedicals, LLC BP 50067, Illkirch, France.

    Curcumin from turmeric powder was extracted solvent extraction method(ASTA,1958). About 10 mg standard

    curcumin sample was taken in 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted up to 10 ml by methanol and kept as stock. The extract

    (2ml) was made up to 10 ml by adding of methanol. Similarly, 10 mg of each turmeric powder sample was put in 100 ml

    volumetric flasks and added with 10 ml methanol. After filtration, the extract (2 ml) was transferred to the volumetric flask

    and diluted to 10 ml with methanol.

    For the separation and detection of the curcumin, a chromatographic system consisted Water (Malaysia) Model

    2998 (USA), with the plus autosampler (USA). All the solvents were filtered using 0.45 m membrane filter (Millipore,

    USA) before injection in HPLC. The standard curcumin (20 l) and other turmeric samples were subjected to HPLCanalysis. The separation and elution were performed by solvents (methanol 24.1%, acetonotrile 38.2% and deionised water

    37.7%) as the mobile phase with the flow rate of 1 ml min-1

    at 350C, and detected at 425 nm and chromatograms were

    processed by Empower 2 software.

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    4/14

    200 Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, Raghvendra Raman Mishra,Mallika Tewari, Hari Shankar Shukla & Bijoy Krishna Roy

    The concentration of curcumin in different samples was determined by comparing with the standard curcumin

    (Figure 3). The amount of curcumin in different turmeric samples was calculated by using the following equation (Kamble

    et al., 2011).

    Cs = As Cc 100 / Ac

    Where Cs = concentration of curcumin in turmeric sample (g/ml) Cc = concentration of standard curcumin

    (g/ml), As = area of sample, AU/min and Ac = area of standard curcumin, AU/min. The amount of curcumin in turmeric

    sample from each site was determined and expressed in percent values.

    Statistical Analysis

    Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 16.0 software (IBM, USA), and the mean and standard

    error analysed by T - test. Analysis of mean of replicate of each sample was performed to go for the accuracy and

    comparing the results of all the sampling sites. The correlation of variable data was obtained to establish the possible

    correlation between production of curcumin and soil physico-chemical properties.

    RESULTS

    Physicochemical Properties of Soil

    Table 1 shows the physico-chemical characteristics of soils from different sites. The level of nutrients varied

    among the samples but their levels in the soils from Varanasi favoured maximum curcumin production relative to other

    sites, Darbhanga, Mirzapur, or Allahabad. The soils pH varied from 8.5-6.8 and was highest (8.5) in soils of Mirzapur and

    the lowest pH (6.8) for Allahabad, followed by soils from Varanasi (pH, 7.1).

    Soil Nutrients Content

    The concentration of Zn was highest in soils of Allahabad, whereas the amount of Cu, Ca, and Mg was highest in

    Darbhanga soils compared to other sites. Similarly, the maximum Fe concentration (65.80 g/g) was found in soils of

    Mirzapur. The Cu concentration (1.10 g/g) was lowest in soils of Allahabad relative to soils of different location.

    Distribution pattern level of Ca was 38.84 g/g, 47.05 g/g, 32.53 g/g, and 35.64 g/g in soils of Varanasi, Darbhanga,

    Allahabad, and Mirzapur, respectively, and indicated that the element was maximum among the other metals in soils. In

    comparison, Cu concentration was lowest in soils of all the sites.

    Level of NPK and Organic Carbon in Soil

    The amount of N, P, and K varied among soils of the sampling site (Table 1). The highest amount of N (41.21

    ppm) and K (45.40 ppm) was observed for soils of Varanasi whereas their amount as comparatively low in soils of other

    sites. The amount of P was highest (2.50 ppm) in soils of Darbhanga, and the lowest (1.70 ppm) for Allahabad. For

    agricultural practices, N, P, and K were used in combination, and hence the level of combined NPK was the highest (88.51

    ppm) in soils of Varanasi followed by Darbhanga > Mirzapur > Allahabad in the decreasing order (Figure 1).

    The highest C level (0.61%) was observed in soils of Varanasi, and the lowest (0.26%) for Darbhanga (Table 1).

    Curcumin Content in Rhizomes

    Figure 2 compares the chromatograms of standard curcumin (2a) and turmeric samples 2(b1-b4). The curcuminwas detected at 425 nm and compared with retention time (8.3 min) of the standard. The highest peak of curcumin was

    observed in samples of Varanasi, followed by the smallest one in samples of Allahabad. The levels of curcumin in samples

    of Allahabad and Mirzapur were comparable. Figure 3 shows a graphical presentation of curcumin amount in turmeric

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    5/14

    Evaluation of Major Determinants in Soil Nutrients Ameliorate for Production of 201Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Curcumin in Rhizomes ofCurcuma longaL.

    rhizomes. Curcumin contents in samples varied among the rhizomes corresponding to each soil. The highest curcumin

    content (9.03%) was from Varanasi, followed by 6.04% from Darbhanga, 4.47% from Mirzapur, and the lowest (4.43%)

    from Allahabad, respectively.

    The correlation coefficient was used to establish the correlation of curcumin production witrh pH and nutrient

    contents in soils as shown [Figure 4(a-e)]. The amount of curcumin was positively correlated with N (R = 0.76) at P

    0.05, K (R = 0.89) at P 0.01, and NPK (R = 0.83) at P 0.05. The results revealed that curcumin content was

    significantly correlated with the level of N, K and combined NPK,whereas rest of soil nutrients were not significant

    relation

    DISCUSSIONS

    In agricultural practices, the correlation between the soil factors and rhizome yield and metabolites synthesis has

    been established (Li et al., 1999). The elevated level of micronutrients in soils also play significant role(s) in increasing

    curcumin production depending on the absorption, accumulation and their role in the metabolic processes. The knowledge

    about the agronomical aspects of turmeric and curcumin production is almost lacking, except for a few reports on the

    cultivation of turmeric (Ishamin et al., 2004; Hossain et al., 2005). The supply and absorption of elements needed for

    growth and metabolism and their participation with the metabolite production, are closely related. Here, on the basis of our

    findings the level of organic and inorganic elements in soils and their role in synthesis of curcumin in rhizome has been

    ascertained. The data on the evaluation of the soil physico-chemicals properties (pH, inorganic, and organic elements) in

    soils from different locations of North-India have been incorporated in Table 1.

    The rhizome curcumin content at four different sites of North-India ranged from 4.43 to 9.03% (Figure 3). Such

    variations could be attributed to the difference in the soil physico-chemical properties. The maximum curcumin content

    (9.03%) was from Varanasi soils and the lowest (4.43%) from Allahabad. Such findings support the earlier report on

    curcumin content in rhizomes of commercially produced turmeric where in the value ranged from 2 to 8% (Heath et al.,

    2004). In a previous study, no direct correlation between rhizome growth and the level of micronutrients K, Ca, and Mg in

    soils has been reported (Oya, 1972).

    Effect of pH Soil on Curcumin Content

    The pH levels also influence soil fertility in respect of growth and yield of different plants. Earlier, the pH of soil

    (4.5-7.5) has been considered suitable for better growth as well as the enhancement of curcumin production in the turmeric

    rhizome (Pradhan et al., 2003; Singh and Rai, 2003). Results incorporated in Table 1, indicate thatsoil pH varied from 6.8

    at Allahabad to the maximum of 8.5 at Mirzapur. The curcumin amount in the rhizome ranged from maximum of 9.09% to

    the minimum of 4.43% as shown in Figure 3. Here, it is of great concern that alkaline pH (8.5) at Mirzapur soil favoured

    higher curcumin amount in comparison to samples from Allahabad. Although, the data in Figure 4(a) indicated the

    correlation coefficient of soil pH (R = 0.109) at P 0.05 in relation to the curcumin content, it was not significantly related

    indicating that not only the individual soil factor but also the soil pH, organic/inorganic elements were playing the

    synergistic role(s) on curcumin production.

    Relation of Soil Nutrients on Production of Curcumin

    The soil metalconcentration varied at different locations as shown in Table 1. It is evident that the amount ofcurcumin in rhizomes enhanced with the certain level of particular element in the soil. The concentration of Ca was

    dominant in soils of Varanasi, Darbhanga, while Fe was maximum (65.81 g/g dry wt) for soils from Allahabad. The Ca

    concentration decreased in the order: Darbhanga 47.05 > Varanasi 38.84 > Mirzapur 35.64 > Allahabad 32.53 g/g dry wt

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    6/14

    202 Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, Raghvendra Raman Mishra,Mallika Tewari, Hari Shankar Shukla & Bijoy Krishna Roy

    followed by Cu (Darbhanga 2.79 > Varanasi 2.54 > Mirzapur 1.50 > Allahabad 1.10 g/g dry wt), respectively. According

    to the present data, the range of curcumin amount can be arranged as: Varanasi 9.03 % > Darbhanga 6.04% > Mirzapur

    4.47% > Allahabad 4.43%. Figure 4(b.1-b.5) showed correlation coefficient of soil metal concentration at P 0.05 with no

    relationship with curcumin production. The result also indicated that single nutrient at dominant level in the soil, has nopositive role in enhancing the curcumin production. In the case of the Mirzapur iron-enriched soils, the amount of

    curcumin was lower in comparison to Varanasi and Darbhanga, but higher than that of Allahabad. Figure 4(b.3) shows that

    the correlation coefficient of Fe (R = 0.164) at P 0.05 in response to curcumin content contradicts the view of Dixit and

    Srivastava (2000) on high curcumin production in the iron-deficient soils. Presently, the enrichment and deficient status of

    individual metal in the soil did not count much in curcumin production.

    Impact of N, P, and K on Productivity of Curcumin

    Figure 4(c.1 and c.3) showed the correlation coefficient for N (R = 0.767) at P 0.05 and K (R = 0.894) at P

    0.01 implying that these significantly influenced the curcumin contents, and supported the earlier finding (Hikaru et al.,2007). Earlier, Singh et al., (1998) reported that increasing the level of K in soils had positive effect on growth of

    rhizomes. In comparison, the values in Figure 4(c.3) also had high correlations with curcumin production. However, Figure

    4(c.2) shows that insignificant correlation coefficient of fertilizer P (R = 0.0449) at P 0.05, and indicated that P

    individually might not be playing significant role in curcumin production.

    Effect of Total Combined NPK

    In most parts of India, usually NPK are used as the fertilisers to improve crop growth/yield. The relation between

    combined NPK level and curcumin production was correlated (coefficient correlation R = 0.83) at P 0.05), and expressed

    in Figure 4(d) which is suggested that combined NPK levels in soils may be the suitable dose for enhancing the curcumin

    amount. Highest amount of curcumin (9.03%) was from Varanasi, indicating that the combined action of NPK in

    agricultural soils at suitable doses, was optimum. The present study showed that the combined NPK level and amount of

    curcumin can be arranged as: Varanasi Darbhanga Mirzapur Allahabad (Figure 1 and 3).

    Effect of Soil Organic Carbon on Curcumin Content

    The level oforganic carbon seems helpful in increasing the soil capacity to maintain the micronutrient availability

    balance between soil and the plant and thus improving the crop quality. Lal (2004) also reported that quality micronutrients

    enhanced biomass production through supply of higher amount of organic carbon. In present finding, the highest organic

    carbon concentration (0.61%) could be the factor for retaining the nutrients in soils of Varanasi, and might have resulted in

    the maximum curcumin production. However, findings on the lower concentration of organic carbon (0.26%) in soils of

    Darbhanga and increased production of curcumin (6.04%) in comparison with other two sites at Mirzapur, and Allahabad

    with 0.35% and 0.27% of organic carbon in soils (Table 1) and their correlation coefficient (R = 0.74) at P 0.05 in

    relation to curcumin production was insignificant as shown in Figure 4(e) and contradicted this assumption. This could be

    explained that other soil factors or the synergistic effects of organic and inorganic nutrients might be playing a role in

    enhancing curcumin production.

    CONCLUSIONS

    It is concluded that curcumin production was dependent mainly on the distribution of fertilizers N, K, or its

    combination (NPK) in addition to certain levels of soil nutrients. Curcumin production corresponding to different locations

    of North-India indicated that level of K in soil was playing more significant role. However, N and the combined NPK level

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    7/14

    Evaluation of Major Determinants in Soil Nutrients Ameliorate for Production of 203Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Curcumin in Rhizomes ofCurcuma longaL.

    in soils at suitable doses, may also play a positive role in the enhancement of curcumin production. These findings could

    also added to agronomic practices for future line of action.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Author would like to express their gratitude for financial support from University of Grant Commission and to

    Department of Botany, Banaras Hindu University, India for providing the instrumental facility for detection of metals in

    soil samples and chromatogram of curcumin in different sample of turmeric rhizomes.

    REFERENCES

    1. Aggarwal, B. B., Kumar, A., Bharti, A. C. (2003). Anticancer potential of curcumin: preclinical and clinicalstudies. Anticancer Research, 23, 363-398

    2. Ahmed, S. H., Vedamuthu, P. G. B., Abdul Khader, Md., and Prakasam, V. (1988).Influence of different levelson potassium on yield and curcumin content of turmeric. In: Satyanarayana et al, (Eds.), Proc Nat Seminar on

    Chillies, Ginger and Turmeric, p. 108-113

    3. Ammon, H. P. T., Wahl, M. A. (1991). PharmacologyofCurcuma longa. Planta Medica, 57, 1-74. ASTA (1958). Official Analytical Methods; American spice Trade Association. Englewood cliff NJ, Method (18)

    color power of turmeric

    5. Azam-Ali, S. N., and Squire, G. R. (2002). Principles of Tropical Agronomy. CABI Publishing, CABInternational, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, p. 236

    6. Balashanmugan, P. V. (1991). Processing and curing of turmeric. South Ind. Horticulture, 39, 214-2167. Chattopadhyay, I., Kaushik, B., Uday, B., Ranajit, K. B. (2004). Turmeric and curcumin: Biological actions and

    medicinal applications. Current Science, 87, 1

    8. Chenchaiah, K. C., Biddappa, C. C., and Acharya G. C. (2002). Arecanut based high density multispeciescropping system for North Bengal. Orissa Journal Horticulture, 30, 114-120

    9. Dixit, D., Srivastava, N. K., (2000). Effect of iron deficiency stress on physiological and biochemical changes inturmeric (Curcuma longa) genotypes. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science, 22, 652-658

    10. Eigner, D., Scholz, D. (1999). Ferula asa-foetida and Curcuma longa in traditional medicinal treatment and dietin Nepal. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 67, 1-6

    11. Gregory, P. J. (1988). Crop growth and development. In: Wild, A (Ed.). Russells Soil Conditions and PlantGrowth (Eleventh edition), pp. 31-68

    12. Heath, D., Khwaja, F., Rock, C. L. (2004). Curcumin content of turmeric and curry powders. FASEB Journal Abstract, 18, 114.1

    13. Hikaru Akamine, Md. Amzad Hossain, Yukio Ishimine, Kenichi Yogi, Kazuo Hokama, Yukikazu Iraha and YokoAniya (2007). Effect of Application of N, P, and K alone or in Combination on Growth, Yield, and Curcumin

    Content of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Plant Production Science, 10(1), 151-154

    14. Hossain, M. A., Ishamin, Y., Akamine, H., and Motomura, K. (2005). Effects of seed rhizome size on growth andyield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Plant Production Science 8, 86-94

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    8/14

    204 Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, Raghvendra Raman Mishra,Mallika Tewari, Hari Shankar Shukla & Bijoy Krishna Roy

    15. Huang, M. T., Lou, Y. R., Ma, W., Newmark, H. L., Reuhl, K. R., Conney, A. H. (1994). Inhibitory effects ofdietary curcumin on forestomach, duodenal, and colon carcinogenesis in mice. Cancer Research, 54, 5841-5847

    16. Huang, M. T., Smart, R. C., Wong, C. Q., Conney, A. H. (1998). Inhibitory effect of curcumin, chlorogenic acid,caffeic acid, and ferulic acid on tumor promotion in mouse skin by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. Cancer

    Research, 48, 5941-5946

    17. Ishimine, Y., Hossain, M. A., Motomura, K., Akamine, H., Hirayama, T. (2004). Effects of planting date onemergence, growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in Okinawa Prefecture, Southern Japan. Japan

    Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 48, 10-16

    18. Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil chemical analysis. Asia Publishing House, Bomaby19. Kamble, K. J., Ingale, V. M., Kaledhonkar, D. P. (2011).Comparative study of curcumin extraction from turmeric

    varieties grown in Maharashtra. African Journal of Food Science, 5, 780-789

    20. Kandiannan, K., Chandaragiri, K. K., Sankaran, N., Balasubramanian, T. N., and Kailasam, C. (2002). Crop-weather model for turmeric yield forecasting for Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Agriculture Forest

    Meteorology, 112, 133-137

    21. Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma., 123, 1-2222. Li, L., Song, H., Zhang, Y., and Fu, S. (1999). A study on fresh rhizome stimulation model and its application to

    comprehensive agronomic measures for good quality and high yield ofCurcuma longa L. Zhongg. Zhon. Yao Za

    Zhi, 24, 654-657, 701

    23. Loomis, R. S., and Amthor, J. S. (1999). Yield potential, plant assimilatory capacity, and metaboloic efficiencies.Crop Science 39, 1584-1596

    24. Meenakshi, N., Sulikeri, G. S., and Hegde, R. V. (2001). Effect of planting material and P & K nutrition on yieldand quality of turmeric. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 14, 197-198

    25. Mohanbabu, N., and Muthuswamy, S. (1984). Influence of potassium on the quality of turmeric. South IndianHorticulture, 32: 343-46

    26.Nybe, E. V., Peter, K. V., and Raj, N. M. (2008). Integrated cropping in coconut involving spice crops. IndianCoconut Journal, 34, 3-9

    27. Osawa, T., Sugiyama, Y., Inayoshi, M., Kawakishi, S. (1995). Antioxidative activity of tetrahydrocurcuminoids.Bioscience Biotechnology Biochemestry, 59, 1609-1612

    28. Oya, K. (1972). Evaluation of potassium availability of four Michigan soils. Sci. Bull Coll. Agr. Univ. Ryukyus,19, 123-257

    29. Oya, K., Tokashiki, Y., Ishimine, Y. (1977). Effects of potassium fertilization on the yields of sweet potatoautumn crop grown on a calcareous soil of Okinawa. Sci. Bull Coll. Agr. Univ. Ryukyus, 24, 191-197

    30. Peach, K., and Tracey, M. V. (1956). Modern Methods of Plant Analysis. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Vol. I.31. Peech, M. (1965). Soil pH by glass electrode pH meter. Method of Soil Analysis. Amr. Soc. Agronomy, 9, 914-

    925

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    9/14

    Evaluation of Major Determinants in Soil Nutrients Ameliorate for Production of 205Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Curcumin in Rhizomes ofCurcuma longaL.

    32. Pradhan, U. B., Maiti, S., and Pal, S. (2003). Effect of frequency of pruning and tree spacing ofLeucaena on thegrowth and productivity of turmeric when grown under alley cropping system with Leucaena leucocephala. J.

    Interacademicia., 7, 11-20

    33. Rao, M. R., Reddy, K. R. C, and Subbarayudu, M. (1975). Promising turmeric types of Andhra Pradesh. IndianSpice, 12(2), 2-13

    34. Rao, C. V., Rivenson, A., Simi, B., Reddy, B. S. (1995). Chemoprevention of colon carcinogenesis by dietarycurcumin, a naturally occurring plant phenolic compound. Cancer Research, 55, 259-266

    35. Ridley, R. N. (1912). Spices. Macmillan and Co., London36. Sarma, N. N., Paul, S. R., Dey, J. K., Sarma, D., Baruah, G. K. S., Sarma, R. K., Maibangsa, M. M., and Dey, A.

    K. (2003). Improved practices for management of shifting cultivation in Assam. Indian Journal Agriculture

    Science, 73, 315-321

    37. Singh, V. B., Singh, N. P., and Swer, B. (1998). Effect of potassium and nitrogen on yield and quality of turmeric(Curcuma longa). Journal of Potassium Research, 14 (1/4), 88-92

    38. Singh, R. V., and Rai, M. (2003). Standardization of mango based cropping system for sustainable production. J.Res. Birsa Agric. University, 15, 61-63

    APPENDICES

    Table 1: Physico-Chemical Properties of Soil Samples Collected from Different Sites

    Concentration of Metals g/g Dry wt. Amount of NPK in ppmOrganic

    Matter in %Sites of

    SamplingpH Zn Cu Fe Ca Mg N P K C

    Varanasi 7.1 9.090.053 2.540.058 29.850.55 38.840.88 24.210.63 41.211.32 1.900.09 45.400.51 0.610.016

    Darbhanga 7.8 6.280.036 2.790.059 20.050.34 47.051.53 28.740.87 39.500.66 2.500.13 35.340.75 0.260.010

    Mirzapur 8.5 8.350.061 1.500.034 65.810.65 35.640.57 20.200.52 27.830.81 1.800.09 21.200.93 0.350.013

    Allahabad 6.8 10.420.74 1.100.029 28.620.62 32.530.78 27.310.59 28.330.89 1.700.11 15.450.74 0.270.017

    Figure 1: Total Concentration of NPK in Soils of Different Sampling Sites.

    Results Shown as Means and Standard Errors. For Sampling Sites n=5

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    10/14

    206 Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, Raghvendra Raman Mishra,Mallika Tewari, Hari Shankar Shukla & Bijoy Krishna Roy

    2(a)

    2(b.1)

    2(b.2)

    2(b.3)

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    11/14

    Evaluation of Major Determinants in Soil Nutrients Ameliorate for Production of 207Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Curcumin in Rhizomes ofCurcuma longaL.

    2(b.4)

    Figure 2: Chromatogram of (a) Curcumin Standard and Curcumin in Rhizomes Samples from Different

    Sites of North-India (b.1) Varanasi (b.2) Darbhanga (b.3) Mirzapur (b.4) Allahabad. The X-Axis Representsthe Retention Time of Separated Components. The Y-Axis Represents the Absorption Unit of Spectra

    Figure 3: Variation of Curcumin Content in Rhizomes from Different Sites. Values Expressed as Percent of

    Curcumin. Results Presented as Means and Standard Errors. For Samples of Turmeric Rhizomes n=5

    4(a)

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    12/14

    208 Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, Raghvendra Raman Mishra,Mallika Tewari, Hari Shankar Shukla & Bijoy Krishna Roy

    4(b.1)

    4(b.2)

    4(b.3)

    4(b.4)

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    13/14

    Evaluation of Major Determinants in Soil Nutrients Ameliorate for Production of 209Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Curcumin in Rhizomes ofCurcuma longaL.

    4(b.5)

    4(c.1)

    4(c.2)

  • 8/22/2019 25. Evaluation of Major Determinants.full

    14/14

    210 Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, Raghvendra Raman Mishra,Mallika Tewari, Hari Shankar Shukla & Bijoy Krishna Roy

    4(c.3)

    4(d)

    4(e)

    Figure 4: Expresses Relation between Curcumin Contents with (a) pH of Soil (b.1-b.5) Concentration

    of Metals Zn, Cu, Fe, Ca, and Mg in g/g Dry wt., Respectively (c.1-c.3) Amount of Fertilizers

    in ppm (d) Level of Total NPK in ppm (e) Level of Organic C in Percent