huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see...

43

Upload: others

Post on 13-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 2: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 3: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 4: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 5: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 6: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 7: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 8: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 9: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 10: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 11: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 12: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 13: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 14: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 15: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 16: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 17: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 18: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 19: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 20: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 21: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 22: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 23: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 24: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 25: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 26: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 27: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 28: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 29: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 30: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 31: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 32: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 33: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 34: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 35: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 36: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 37: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 38: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 39: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 40: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 41: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 42: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction
Page 43: huntingtonarchive.org · 2018-12-15 · Coomaraswamy was essentially correct, she preferred to see the prototype called a "king type" even though she did not feel that this distinction