2013 07 pert

Upload: wendha-asbet-swandita

Post on 14-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    1/40

    MANAJEMEN PROYEK

    1

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    2/40

    2

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    3/40

    PERT AND CRASH PROGRAM

    3

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    4/40

    PERT: PROGRAM EVALUATION

    REVIEW TECHNIQUE

    4

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    5/40

    One way of incorporating Risk Planning:

    Program Evaluation Review Technique

    5

    Assumes each activity duration has a range that statistically

    follows a beta distribution

    PERT incorporates three time estimates for each activity: an

    optimistic time, a pessimistic time, and a most likely time torepresent activity durations

    These estimates usually gathered from polling individuals or from lookingat history for similar tasks

    A weighted average and variance for each activity is computed

    Knowing the weighted average and variances for each activity allows the

    project planner to compute the probability of meeting different project

    durations

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    6/40

    Activity and Project Frequency

    Distributions

    6

    Why might activity distributions look so skewed?

    Even with such skewed activity distributions, why

    is the overall

    Project distribution symmetric?

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    7/40

    Activity Time Calculations

    7

    The weighted average activity time is computed by thefollowing formula:

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    8/40

    Activity Time Calculations

    (contd)

    The variability in the activity time estimates is approximated bythe following equations:

    The standard

    deviation for theactivity:

    The standard

    deviation for theproject:

    8

    Note the standard deviation of the activity is squared in this

    equation; this is also called variance. This sum includes only

    activities on the critical path(s) or path being reviewed.

    2eE

    tT

    6

    ab

    et

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    9/40

    Example

    Given the following activities, expected durations and

    predecessor information, construct the AoA project

    network and use the CPM.

    9

    Activity duration predecessors

    a1 30 ---

    a2 13 a1

    a3 20 a1

    a4 16 a2

    a5 6 a3

    a6 5 a5,a4

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    10/40

    Activity Times and Variances

    10

    TABLE A7.1

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    11/40

    Probability of Completing the

    Project

    11

    The equation below is used to compute the Z value found in

    statistical tables (Z = number of standard deviations from the

    mean), which, in turn, tells the probability of completing the

    project in the time specified.

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    12/40

    Hypothetical Network

    12

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    13/40

    Text Example

    Consider the following 6-activity project

    Draw the AoN and use the CPM to compute the CP, slack

    Use PERT to analyze the chance the delays on CP activities does not

    push the project duration beyond 67 days.

    Anything else we should consider? (even though your text doesnt?)

    13

    Activity a m b te=(a+b+4m)/6 var=((b-a)/6) 2

    a1 17 29 47 30 25

    a2 6 12 24 13 9a3 16 19 28 20 4

    a4 13 16 19 16 1

    a5 2 5 14 6 4

    a6 2 5 8 5 1

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    14/40

    Example: Network,CP,Slack

    14

    Fill in the rest if you want practice finding slack

    a1

    a3 a5

    a6

    a4a2

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    15/40

    PERT, Considering the CP

    15

    Activity a m b te=(a+b+4m)/6 var=((b-a)/6) 2a1 17 29 47 30 25

    a2 6 12 24 13 9

    a3 16 19 28 20 4

    a4 13 16 19 16 1

    a5 2 5 14 6 4

    a6 2 5 8 5 1nice they div ide by 6! even nicer the sqrts a

    CPM

    paths a1->a2->a4->a6 64 thus this is the critical path

    a1->a3->a5->a6 61 total slack = 3

    Given a scheduled time: Ts 67

    Chance project (considering CP) is less:

    stdev(path) =sqrt( sum var(path) 6.00 still integer-wheee!

    z = (Ts-Te)/stdev(Cpath) 0.5

    so prob = 69% is the chance w e are not later than the scheduled time, considering the CP.

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    16/40

    Example: Possible Project Duration

    16

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    17/40

    Some Sample Z Values

    A Z-table listing such values will be provided to you on exams

    Excel has these calculations built in =normsdist(z), =normsinv(%)

    17

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    18/40

    Possible Project Duration

    Probability project is completed before

    scheduled time (TS

    ) of 67 units

    Probability project is completed

    by the 60th unit time period (TS

    )

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    19/40

    ZValues and Probabilities

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    20/40

    What Might We Have Forgotten?

    20

    In the CPM, it is clear what the

    critical path is!

    With PERT we can now consider

    network sensitivity in more detail.

    Extension of the textbook example- what

    additional analysis might you do?

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    21/40

    PERT: Caveats Abound

    21

    For checking project duration considering multiple

    paths, its not as simple as adding up the

    probabilities.

    Different paths usually have some activities in common.

    Once again, the whole assumption of independence of

    activity durations must be considered.

    For complex or high-value projects, Monte Carlo

    simulation is often a more appropriate approach.

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    22/40

    REDUCING PROJECT DURATION

    22

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    23/40

    Rationale for Reducing Project DurationTime Is Money: Cost-Time Tradeoffs

    23

    Reducing the time of a critical activity usually incurs additional direct costs.

    Cost-time solutions focus on reducing (crashing) activities onthe critical path to shorten overall duration of the project.

    Reasons for imposed project duration dates:

    Customer requirements and contract commitments

    Time-to-market pressures

    Incentive contracts (bonuses for early completion)

    Unforeseen delays

    Overhead and goodwill costs

    Pressure to move resources to other projects

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    24/40

    Options for Accelerating Project

    Completion

    Adding Resources

    Outsourcing Project Work

    Scheduling Overtime

    Establishing a Core Project

    Team

    Do It TwiceFast and

    Correctly

    Fast-Tracking

    Critical-Chain

    Reducing Project Scope

    Compromise Quality

    24

    When Resources are NOTconstrained

    When Resources areconstrained

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    25/40

    Explanation of Project Costs

    25

    Project Indirect Costs

    Costs that cannot be associated with any particular work package or

    project activity.

    Supervision, administration, consultants, and interest

    Costs that vary (increase) with time.

    Reducing project time directly reduces indirect costs.

    Direct Costs

    Normal costs that can be assigned directly to a specific work packageor project activity.

    Labor, materials, equipment, and subcontractors

    Crashing activities increases direct costs.

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    26/40

    Reducing Project Duration to

    Reduce Project Cost

    26

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    27/40

    Project CostDuration Graph

    27

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    28/40

    Constructing a Project Cost

    Duration Graph

    28

    Find total direct costs for selected project durations.

    Find total indirect costs for selected project durations.

    Sum direct and indirect costs for these selected project durations.

    Compare additional cost alternatives for benefits.

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    29/40

    Constructing a Project Cost

    Duration Graph

    29

    Determining Activities to Shorten

    Shorten the activities with the smallest increase in cost per unit of

    time.

    Assumptions: The cost relationship is linear.

    Normal time assumes low-cost, efficient methods to complete

    the activity.

    Crash time represents a limitthe greatest time reductionpossible under realistic conditions.

    Slope represents a constant cost per unit of time.

    All accelerations must occur within the normal and crash times.

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    30/40

    Activity Graph

    30

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    31/40

    CostDuration Trade-off Example

    31

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    32/40

    CostDuration Trade-off Example

    32

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    33/40

    CostDuration Trade-off Example

    33

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    34/40

    CostDuration Trade-off Example

    34

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    35/40

    CostDuration Trade-off Example

    35

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    36/40

    Summary Costs by Duration

    36

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    37/40

    Project CostDuration Graph

    37

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    38/40

    Practical Considerations

    38

    Using the Project CostDuration Graph

    Crash Times

    Linearity Assumption

    Choice of Activities to Crash Revisited

    Time Reduction Decisions and Sensitivity

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    39/40

    What if Cost, Not Time is the Issue?

    39

    Commonly

    Used

    Options

    for Cutting

    Costs

    Reduce project scope

    Have owner take on more

    responsibility

    Outsourcing project activities or

    even the entire project

    Brainstorming cost savingsoptions

  • 7/27/2019 2013 07 PERT

    40/40

    END OF THIS CHAPTER

    40