2011.04.27_ demand response opportunities
DESCRIPTION
2011 academic research project on emerging trends in the electric power and Utility Industry.TRANSCRIPT
Daniel Burillo April 27, 2011
S11-18875: S11-Engineering and Economics of Electric Energy Systems
REAL-TIME DEMAND RESPONSE Objectives, implementation, technical and economic issues
Objectives – ORNL’s Definitions
Source: ORNL 2006. Demand Response For Power System Reliability: FAQ.
Real
-Tim
e
FERC’s Definitions
¨ Demand response, whereby customers reduce electricity consumption from normal usage levels in response to price signals, can generally occur in two ways: ¤ (1) customers reduce demand by responding to retail
rates that are based on wholesale prices (sometimes called “price-responsive demand”); and
¤ (2) customers provide demand response that acts as a resource in organized wholesale energy markets to balance supply and demand.
Implementation – FERC’s Terms...
FERC 2010. Demand Response/Time-Based Rate Programs and Advanced Metering
Implementation – PJM’s Terms
Economic Load Response Load responding to price, voluntary, no capacity payment Emergency Load Response, Energy Only
Load responding to a PJM Emergency, voluntary, no capacity payment
Emergency Load Response, Capacity Only
Load responding to a PJM Emergency, Mandatory, no energy payment
Emergency Load Response, Full Emergency
Load responding to a PJM Emergency, Mandatory, energy and capacity payments
Load Management Formerly known as ALM. A term used to describe load designated as a capacity resource in PJM.
BRA Base Residual AucCon. An aucCon in the Reliability Pricing Model
DR Demand Response. Load Management that parCcipates directly in the BRA.
ILR InterrupCble Load Response. Load Management that does not parCcipate in the BRA but rather cerCfies prior to the Delivery Year.
GLD Guaranteed Load Drop – a Load Management type FSL Firm Service Level – a Load Management type DLC Direct Load Control – a Load Management type CSP Curtailment Service Provider. The enCty that interfaces with PJM
LSE Load Serving EnCty. The party that is contractually obligated for retail energy supply.
Issues
Implementation – Examples
¨ PG&E’s SmartAC ¤ No cost, participants receive $25 once
¨ Wisconsin Public Service ¤ Contracted DLC of AC and water heaters ¤ Participants pay $6 to $28 monthly for I&M ¤ Benefit $4.35/kWh to $6.50/kWh
Real-time pricing is NOT real-time DR
¨ Market friction ¨ Behavioral economics ¨ US & EU price elasticity
(-0.21 to -0.18)
Source: Azevedo 2010. US and EU residential electricity consumptions: can electricity price, household income or weather explain regional differences?
Technical Issues
¨ Mostly systems design & programming problems
¨ Switching individual loads is mostly an ECE issue ¤ Phase, communications reliability, communications security
¨ Switching aggregated loads are ECE and Econ issues ¤ Also: step functions, servers, transmission, congestion
¨ “Metadata” info. or self-awareness is missing or inaccurate
¨ Dispatching services at the ISO/RTO are Econ issues
Economic Issues
¨ Local to Aggregator ¤ Return on investment, scalability, participant incentives ¤ Structure: time per hour, day year? ¤ Devices connected: HVAC, water heater, other? ¤ Who has control, and what are the penalties?
¨ Aggregator to Transmission Operator ¤ What are we measuring? (KW, KWh, KWh/t) ¤ How? and relative to what? ¤ How and when are bids placed?
n Remember: the whole reason we’re doing this is because we CAN’T predict the load any better!
Economic issues – Business Analysis
¨ Remember: Policy issues = business issues ¤ When are Markets Best?
(externalities?, competition?, good information?) n GHGs, intermittent generation n Incumbent reliability services, monopolistic markets n Market transparency?
¤ Iron Law of Government: winners & losers n Winners: Program participants, CSPs, some utilities, switch
manufacturers, local jobs, solar & wind, society/environment n Losers: Incumbent generators, NG industry, some utilities
¤ Regulation: Command & Control v Market Incentives
Economic Issues – FERC’s Order
¨ March 15, 2011 – DR in wholesale market with RTO/ISO that can balance supply and demand instead of generation resources:
¨ To be compensated at the LMP ¤ If it’s “cost-effective” ¤ DR must pass “net benefits test”
n Concern over “billing unit effect”
Economic Issues – Billing unit effect
? ? ?
¨ êΔD = éΔP ¨ What’s wrong with this thinking? ¨ Not a free market! ¨ Supply MUST = Demand!
¨ So, what happens when êΔD ? ¤ êmarginal gen. ¤ êcongestion ¤ Who wins/loses?
$
MWh
S
D
Economic Issues – FERC’s Order contd...
¨ By July 22, 2011 – ISOs/RTOs must file ¤ Net benefits test ¤ Measurement and verification explanation ¤ Proposed policy changes ¤ Cost allocation mechanism
¨ By Sept 21, 2012 – ISOs/RTOs must file ¤ Requirements and impacts to modify the dispatch
algorithm and implement a “dynamic approach.”
Summary
¨ Real Time DR = Automated DR = Direct load control ¨ No standard exists yet, but we’re working on it
¨ Wholesale economic issues are more traditional economic issues ¤ Prices will be based on energy and the LMP.
¨ Retail economic issues are more behavioral economic issues
¤ Best programs will consider consumers’ values and indirect costs ¤ Standardized contracts through local aggregators such as utilities and
CSPs will probably become the norm
¨ Technical implementation issues are solvable – for a price ¤ Economies of scale are not currently very attractive for most residential
¨ Need modification of ISO/RTO dispatch algorithms to cross the chasm
References
¨ ORNL 2006. Demand Response For Power System Reliability: FAQ.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.154.3320&rep=rep1&type=pdf
¨ FERC 2011. Demand Response Compensation in Organized Wholesale Energy Marketshttp://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/Files/20110315105757-RM10-17-000.pdf
¨ FERC 2010. DRIVE Model http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/demand-response/dr-potential/action-plan.asp
¨ FERC 2010. Demand Response/Time-Based Rate Programs and Advanced Metering http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/demand-response/2010/instructions.pdf
¨ PJM http://www.pjm.com
¨ PG&E SmartAC program http://www.pge-smartac.com/freesmartac/
¨ Wisconsin DLC program http://www.wisconsinpublicservice.com/business/cdlc.aspx