1vsxj o1rjyqo/nj[ j...
TRANSCRIPT
Climate Change Adaptation Plan
Protecting Riparian Zones with a Focus on tream Crossings for Forest Management
April 17, 2017
Prepared Nick Anzuoni and Alison Wright-Hunter
Prepared using the Adaptation Workook - AdaptationWorkook.org
Propert details
Acres: 100
ize: 0
Ownership: tate
We are designing a timer sale on a state forest where theexisting main access road has multiple failed culverts forstreams that drain into the Deer�eld River. The goal is toremove the failed culverts and replace them with an
economical ridge alternative that will meet state and localenvironmental regulations while also taking into accountincreased water �ows due to climate change. Additionall,the impacts of climate change to the forest in the riparian
zone have een assessed and adaptive tactics havecreated.
Climate Adaptation Plan Protecting Riparian Zones with a Focus on tream Crossings for Forest Management
Project Details 100 acres
ize: 0
tate ownership
We are designing a timer sale on a state forest where the existing main access road hasmultiple failed culverts for streams that drain into the Deer�eld River. The goal is to removethe failed culverts and replace them with an economical ridge alternative that will meetstate and local environmental regulations while also taking into account increased water�ows due to climate change. Additionall, the impacts of climate change to the forest in theriparian zone have een assessed and adaptive tactics have created.
Management area(s) outh River F Riparian Zones
Regional Climate
Change Impacts &
Propert-Level
Considerations
The following climate change impacts are regional expectations drawn from pulishedresources. Under each regional climate change impact statement, propert-levelconsiderations descrie how the general trend might e meaningful at the scale of thepropert.
Temperatures in New ngland are projected to increase 3.5 to 8.5 °F the end of the
centur, with the greatest warming expected to occur during winter.
Propert considerations: High temperatures in the summer will potentiall create droughtconditions which will result in hdrophoic soil conditions. Reduced snow pack and lack offrost laer can cause root damage for shallow rooted species, such as sugar maple andhemlock. oth of these species are found in the forest.
The growing season in New ngland and northern New York is generall expected to
increase 20 das or more the end of the centur, due to fewer das with a minimum
temperatures elow 32°F.
Propert considerations: This scenario will allow invasive plant species to spreadthroughout the understor. This ma a�ect riparian u�er zone plant composition.
The winter season will e shorter and milder across New ngland and northern New York,
with less precipitation falling as snow and reduced snow cover and depth.
Propert considerations: This situation will result in increased stream �ow during the wintermonths. Additionall, there will e increased runo� and decreased spring snow pack thatrecharges the water tale.
Precipitation patterns will e altered, with projected increases in annual precipitation and
potential for reduced growing season precipitation in New ngland and northern New
York.
Propert considerations: evere summer droughts will create a stressed conditions fortrees within the riparian u�er zone. In particular, sugar maple and hemlock are currentlpresent and are also susceptile to drought.
Intense precipitation events will continue to ecome more frequent in New ngland and
northern New York.
Propert considerations: These "intense" precipitation events will increase scouring of thestream channel, have potential to exceed "ank full" conditions. If the failing culverts areleft in place or are replaced with the same size, as Massachusetts law allows, this willcontinue to impair the natural �ow of the stream.
Warmer temperatures and altered precipitation in New ngland and northern New York
will interact to change soil moisture patterns throughout the ear, with the potential for
oth wetter and drier conditions depending on the location and season.
Propert considerations: The drier soil condition has potential to create a hdrophoic soilcondition where there ma e increased runo�. Where forested wetland "sources" exist(such as a seep) the drier condition ma alter the function of the wetland. Wetter soilconditions ma prevent forest management activities due to di�cult accessiilit to thestands.
Forest vegetation in New ngland and northern New York ma face increased risk of
moisture de�cit and drought during the growing season.
Propert considerations: In particular, sugar maple and hemlock in the riparian u�er mae a�ected drought. Additionall, understor species such as maiden hair fern and otherrich mesic site species ma e a�ected.
Certain insect pests and pathogens will increase in occurrence or ecome more
damaging in New ngland and northern New York.
Propert considerations: This stand is composed of ash and hemlock which are alread atrisk due to invasive insects. It is unknown if other invasive insects and diseases will infestthe stands.
Man invasive plants will increase in extent or aundance in New ngland and northern
New York.
Propert considerations: Invasive plants are present in the stand and have potential toa�ect the riparian u�er zone species composition and function.
Man northern and oreal tree species will face increasing stress across much of New
ngland and northern New York.
Propert considerations: pecies such as sugar maple, ash, ellow irch and red spruce arepresent and will e impacted.
Haitat will ecome more suitale in New ngland and northern New York for some
southern species.
Propert considerations: There is some red oak and itternut hickor present within thestand. There is potential to increase the percentage of these species within the stand.
Forest composition will change across the landscape in New ngland and northern New
York.
Propert considerations: Northern and oreal species are present within the stand andover time will shift to the north. Other species that are more drought tolerant willreassemle within the gaps in the stand.
hifts in forest composition in New ngland and northern New York will take at least
several decades to occur in the asence of major disturance.
Propert considerations: Forest management activities are the "planned disturances" andare making an e�ort to adapt the stands to climate change through shifting speciescomposition to more drought tolerant species.
Conditions a�ecting tree regeneration and recruitment will change in New ngland and
northern New York.
Propert considerations: There is moderate mortalit to seedlings and saplings of theexisting species composition during severe drought. The more drought tolerant species willsurvive during these drought periods.
Forest productivit in New ngland and northern New York will increase during the next
several decades in the asence of signi�cant stressors.
Propert considerations: If "forest productivit" means a healthier, faster growing forest; thisma impl that the forested riparian u�er is more "stale" and functional.
Low-diversit sstems are at greater risk from climate change.
Propert considerations: There is a sugar maple stand with a high percentage of thisspecies. Natural Heritage program will not allow harvesting within the stand and thereforenatural processes will occur.
pecies in fragmented landscapes will have less opportunit to migrate in response to
climate change.
Propert considerations: The outh River tate Forest is part of a large forested lock withver little fragmentation.
stems that are limited to particular environments will have less opportunit to migrate
in response to climate change.
Propert considerations: The "sstem" present, a rich mesic northern forest tpe, is at risk.
stems that are more tolerant of disturance have less risk of declining on the
landscape
Propert considerations: The "sstems" that are more drought tolerant ma replace thevulnerale existing rich mesic northern forest.
Climate Adaptation Plan for Individual Management areas
The following plan details the management goals and ojectives for a particular component of the project. Included elow isa detailed review of potential climate impacts and site level considerations, along with an evaluation of ojectives, potentialadaptation responses (tactics) and monitoring variales to assess success over time.
Plan for speci�c
Management areaouth River F Riparian Zones
The riparian zones within the outh River tate Forest sourced multiple seeps and smallwetland areas. The soils are of the rich mesic tpe and are highl erodile. tale streamcrossings are essential to the forest management of the area.
Management Goal Replace failed culverts with an economical ridge alternative.
Management
Ojective(s)
Design a ridge option that would e accepted local conservation commission under a
RFD. (3-4 months)
Management Goal Restore verterate and inverterate passage in the riparian zone.
Management
Ojective(s)
Replicate natural stream ottom conditions. (7-8 months)
increase length of natural stream ottom conditions that is continuous from the source to the
river. (7-8 months)
Management Goal Protect multiple riparian zones during forest management activities.
Management
Ojective(s)
Control native and non native invasive plants in order to ensure tree regeneration and an
understor dominated native heraceous and wood plants. (In the next 2 ears)
Manage for diversit of tree species and age classes within the riparian zone, while
maintaining adequate shade to control micro climate conditions and cooler water
temperatures. (In the next 2 ears)
Maintain soil moisture in this rich mesic ecosstem. (In the next 2 ears)
Maintain at least 50% of the asal area in the riparian zone. (In the next 2 ears)
Potential identi�ed
impacts for outh River
F Riparian Zones
Increased rainfall events will accelerate stream ed erosion
rosion has alread occurred and existing culverts are no longer functional. This erosion isalso impacted approaches on the forest roads.
Regional climate change projections of stream�ow characteristics in the Northeast and
Midwest U.. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/2214581815001226)
Climate change will extend the growing season.
The extended growing season will allow native and non-native invasives, such asittersweet and grape to e more proli�c. These species are present in the riparian u�erzone and have the ailit to severel damage tree crowns arl and warmer springscenario could lead to loss of cold hardiness, earl leaf out and susceptiilit to frostdamage oth in the crown and to the camium.
Climate Change Indicators: Length of Growing eason (https://www.epa.gov/climate-
indicators/climate-change-indicators-length-growing-season)
The interaction etween freezing tolerance and phenolog in temperate deciduous trees
(https://www.nci.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192447/)
Decreased snow pack, increased winter rainfal and potential summer drought could
reduce the fuction of the wetland source of the streams.
The streams in outh River tate Forest have small wetland sources where the fuctioncould e compromised altered water availailit.
Climate Change �ects and Adaptation Approaches for Terrestrial cosstems, Haitats,
and pecies (http://www.nwf.org/~/media/PDFs/Gloal-Warming/2014/Terrestrial-Report/CC-
and-Terrestrial-stems_Final-Report_NPLCC-NWF_online-size.pdf)
Increased stress on trees in the riparian u�er.
The riparian u�er is composed of primaril sugar maple, hemlock and white ash. All threespecies are sensitive to changes in water availailit. Decreases in water availailit causesstress that ma increase mortalit caused native and non native insects and diseases.
Decreased snowpack could lead to increased acidi�cation of soils.
ugar maple is a dominant species in the watershed and riparian zones of the outh Rivertate Forest. ugar maple ma decline over the next 100 ears due to acidi�cation of forestsoils.
In�uence of experimental snow removal on root and canop phsiolog of sugar maple
trees in a northern hardwood forest
(https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pus/jrnl/2013/nrs_2013_comerford_001.pdf)
Potential impact of
climate change on
health and function of
sstem
Disruptive
Adaptive Capacit of
sstem to climate
change impacts or
disturances
Moderate
Vulnerailit
determination
Moderate
valuation of climate change impacts on goals and ojectives
Climate change might make management ojectives for this propert harder or easier to achieve, presenting challenges andopportunities. This section also includes a simple rating and description for the feasiilit of meeting management ojectivesunder current management. This is a critical step to evaluate whether management ojectives are roust, or whether anmight need to e changed.
Management Goal Replace failed culverts with an economical ridge alternative.
Management Ojective Design a ridge option that would e accepted local conservation commission under aRFD. (3-4 months)
Challenges The potential for higher rainfall during the operailit period would limit the success of thisproject. This would e due to high �ows, wet soil conditions and the potential for higherosion.
Opportunities The present impacts of climate change indicate increasing rainfall and therefore is negativelimpacting the stream crossings. The predicted impacts of climate change, such as highvelocit stream �ows, onl support the proposal to improve the stream crossing structure.
Medium
Feasiilit of meeting
ojectives after
evaluation of climate
impacts on sstem
Medium
Other Considerations Comments: Under the current wetland regulations this ma fall under more stringentpermitting. Due to the projected impacts of climate change, a project of this nature would eimproving the "resource".
Responding to climate change impacts
The following adaptation actions (tactics) were identi�ed to help prepare for climate change impacts. ach adaptation tactic islinked to one or more Adaptation trategies and Approaches, providing connections to climate change adaptation and forestmanagement and conservation. Refer to the Adaptation Workook for a complete list of Adaptation trategies andApproaches.
Note - Tactics that are recommended can e implemented or explored further. However, some adaptation tactics might note recommended for implementation on this propert, which ma e due to a comination of arriers and drawacks orexternal factors.
Adaptation Tactic Remove failing culverts. Replace them with ridges.
trateg ustain fundamental ecological functions
Approach Maintain or restore riparian areas
ene�ts of this tactic Replacing culverts with ridges will restore connectivit and protect stream channels.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
none
Timeframe to implement in the next ear
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Monitoring adaptation actions
Monitoring is critical for understanding if management actions are e�ective or if management should e altered in the futureto account for new information. The following monitoring variales were descried for this particular management ojectiveand adaptation tactics.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
ridge alternative is accepted the local conservation commission. Culverts have een
removed.
management
ojective(s)
Monitoring Variale 1
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Request for Determination or Limited Project permits were issued.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Permits will e issued prior to the timer sale.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
ridge design and construction cost limitations.
Monitoring Variale 2
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Costs don't exceed 40% of the income generated the timer sale.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
stimated costs will e gathered prior to the timer sale.
valuation of climate change impacts on goals and ojectives
Climate change might make management ojectives for this propert harder or easier to achieve, presenting challenges andopportunities. This section also includes a simple rating and description for the feasiilit of meeting management ojectivesunder current management. This is a critical step to evaluate whether management ojectives are roust, or whether anmight need to e changed.
Management Goal Restore verterate and inverterate passage in the riparian zone.
Management Ojective Replicate natural stream ottom conditions. (7-8 months)
Challenges If summers and autumns are wetter, the feasiilit of working to replicate the natural streamottom would e limited.
Opportunities If there are drought conditions, there would e a etter chance of working in low or no �owconditions. This would improve the outcome of the jo and would limit sedimentation.
Feasiilit of meeting Medium
Comments: With the current climate conditions the window of opportunit to complete this
ojectives after
evaluation of climate
impacts on sstem
Comments: With the current climate conditions the window of opportunit to complete thisjo is unpredictale.
Other Considerations Comments: An work in the the stream ottom, ank or u�er zone requires permittingthrough the town's conservation commission. This is will require funding that ma onl efeasile through the timer sale contract.
Responding to climate change impacts
The following adaptation actions (tactics) were identi�ed to help prepare for climate change impacts. ach adaptation tactic islinked to one or more Adaptation trategies and Approaches, providing connections to climate change adaptation and forestmanagement and conservation. Refer to the Adaptation Workook for a complete list of Adaptation trategies andApproaches.
Note - Tactics that are recommended can e implemented or explored further. However, some adaptation tactics might note recommended for implementation on this propert, which ma e due to a comination of arriers and drawacks orexternal factors.
Adaptation Tactic Remove failing culverts. Replace them with ridges.
trateg ustain fundamental ecological functions
Approach Maintain or restore riparian areas
ene�ts of this tactic Replacing culverts with ridges will restore connectivit and protect stream channels.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
none
Timeframe to implement in the next ear
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Monitoring adaptation actions
Monitoring is critical for understanding if management actions are e�ective or if management should e altered in the futureto account for new information. The following monitoring variales were descried for this particular management ojectiveand adaptation tactics.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
ridge alternative is accepted the local conservation commission. Culverts have een
removed.
management
ojective(s)
Monitoring Variale 1
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Request for Determination or Limited Project permits were issued.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Permits will e issued prior to the timer sale.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
ridge design and construction cost limitations.
Monitoring Variale 2
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Costs don't exceed 40% of the income generated the timer sale.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
stimated costs will e gathered prior to the timer sale.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
Post culvert removal stream ottom conditions are improved and length of stream courses
are increased.
Monitoring Variale 3
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
tream course conditions are uninterrupted culverts. Length of uninterrupted streamcourse has increased.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Measure stream course post culvert removal.
valuation of climate change impacts on goals and ojectives
Climate change might make management ojectives for this propert harder or easier to achieve, presenting challenges andopportunities. This section also includes a simple rating and description for the feasiilit of meeting management ojectivesunder current management. This is a critical step to evaluate whether management ojectives are roust, or whether anmight need to e changed.
Management Goal Restore verterate and inverterate passage in the riparian zone.
Management Ojective increase length of natural stream ottom conditions that is continuous from the source to theriver. (7-8 months)
Challenges If the operailit period is shortened due to wetter soils in oth winter and in the growingperiod, more temporar stream crossings ma e necessar.
Opportunities In drought conditions, operailit will allow equipment on a wider range of soils withoutimpact, minimizing the numer of temporar stream crossings
Feasiilit of meeting
ojectives after
evaluation of climate
impacts on sstem
Medium
Comments: The climate and weather conditions are alread providing windows of dr ordrought conditions for optimizing operailit. The largest impediment to movement forwildlife are the existing failed culverts
Responding to climate change impacts
The following adaptation actions (tactics) were identi�ed to help prepare for climate change impacts. ach adaptation tactic islinked to one or more Adaptation trategies and Approaches, providing connections to climate change adaptation and forestmanagement and conservation. Refer to the Adaptation Workook for a complete list of Adaptation trategies andApproaches.
Note - Tactics that are recommended can e implemented or explored further. However, some adaptation tactics might note recommended for implementation on this propert, which ma e due to a comination of arriers and drawacks orexternal factors.
Adaptation Tactic Remove failing culverts. Replace them with ridges.
trateg ustain fundamental ecological functions
Approach Maintain or restore riparian areas
ene�ts of this tactic Replacing culverts with ridges will restore connectivit and protect stream channels.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
none
Timeframe to implement in the next ear
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
implementation tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Monitoring adaptation actions
Monitoring is critical for understanding if management actions are e�ective or if management should e altered in the futureto account for new information. The following monitoring variales were descried for this particular management ojectiveand adaptation tactics.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
ridge alternative is accepted the local conservation commission. Culverts have een
removed.
Monitoring Variale 1
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Request for Determination or Limited Project permits were issued.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Permits will e issued prior to the timer sale.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
ridge design and construction cost limitations.
Monitoring Variale 2
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Costs don't exceed 40% of the income generated the timer sale.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
stimated costs will e gathered prior to the timer sale.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
nsure that the stream replication areas are stale and functioning.
management
ojective(s)
Monitoring Variale 3
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
The replicated area functions similar to upstream and downstream conditions.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
These replication areas will e monitored within the �rst 6 months of replication and thenearl for the next �ve ears.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
Post culvert removal stream ottom conditions are improved and length of stream courses
are increased.
Monitoring Variale 4
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
tream course conditions are uninterrupted culverts. Length of uninterrupted streamcourse has increased.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Measure stream course post culvert removal.
valuation of climate change impacts on goals and ojectives
Climate change might make management ojectives for this propert harder or easier to achieve, presenting challenges andopportunities. This section also includes a simple rating and description for the feasiilit of meeting management ojectivesunder current management. This is a critical step to evaluate whether management ojectives are roust, or whether anmight need to e changed.
Management Goal Protect multiple riparian zones during forest management activities.
Management Ojective Control native and non native invasive plants in order to ensure tree regeneration and anunderstor dominated native heraceous and wood plants. (In the next 2 ears)
Challenges Longer growing periods due to warmer weather conditions will allow non native invasiveplants to spread more rapidl. Wetter conditions oth in the winter and summer ma facilitatethe spread of invasives.
Opportunities none
Feasiilit of meeting Medium
ojectives after
evaluation of climate
impacts on sstem
Responding to climate change impacts
The following adaptation actions (tactics) were identi�ed to help prepare for climate change impacts. ach adaptation tactic islinked to one or more Adaptation trategies and Approaches, providing connections to climate change adaptation and forestmanagement and conservation. Refer to the Adaptation Workook for a complete list of Adaptation trategies andApproaches.
Note - Tactics that are recommended can e implemented or explored further. However, some adaptation tactics might note recommended for implementation on this propert, which ma e due to a comination of arriers and drawacks orexternal factors.
Adaptation Tactic Invasive plants will e spraed pre and post harvest.
trateg Reduce the impact of iological stressors
Approach Manage herivor to promote regeneration of desired species
ene�ts of this tactic This will encourage the growth of native plants.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
none
Timeframe to implement within a ear
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Monitoring adaptation actions
Monitoring is critical for understanding if management actions are e�ective or if management should e altered in the futureto account for new information. The following monitoring variales were descried for this particular management ojectiveand adaptation tactics.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
Reduce the non native and native invasive plant species cover.
Monitoring Variale 1
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Reduce non native and native invasive plant species cover 80% of existing infestation.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
The invasive cover will e measured initiall post treatment and then a ear later.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
The variale is tree species composition and numer age classes.
Monitoring Variale 2
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Increase diversit within the riparian zone three species. Introduce one new age classwithin the next ten ears.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Inventor riparian zones �ve and 10 ears post harvest.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
The rich mesic ecosstem plant communities that are currentl present.
Monitoring Variale 3
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
The presence or asence of heraceous plants that would e associated with the rich mesiccommunit are measured.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Inventor of the understor will e conducted �ve and ten ears post harvest.
valuation of climate change impacts on goals and ojectives
Climate change might make management ojectives for this propert harder or easier to achieve, presenting challenges andopportunities. This section also includes a simple rating and description for the feasiilit of meeting management ojectivesunder current management. This is a critical step to evaluate whether management ojectives are roust, or whether anmight need to e changed.
Management Goal Protect multiple riparian zones during forest management activities.
Management Ojective Manage for diversit of tree species and age classes within the riparian zone, whilemaintaining adequate shade to control micro climate conditions and cooler watertemperatures. (In the next 2 ears)
Challenges Climate change will accelerate the spread of Hemlock wooll adelgid which will impact amajor species in the riparian zone. Recent mortalit to the hemlock stands is primaril due toelongate scale. We have ver little iological information regarding this species. oth insectsare present. Additionall, regeneration will ecome di�cult due to invasive plants in theunderstor. White ash is also a signi�cant component of the riparian zone and due to A itwill need to e harvested. We are also experiencing in the area 5 new fungi causing needlecast on white pine.
Opportunities Due to the need for a more intense harvest of the riparian zone (due to exotic pests, seeaove), regeneration will e accelerated. This will occur in the near future while the climate iscooler.
Climate change ma facilitate the use of arti�cial regeneration to shift the composition in theriparian zone. pecies such as Northern red oak and various species of hickor would eused. There is also an American chestnut seed orchard located on the forest and this wouldalso e an excellent opportunit to re-introduce the species ack to the landscape.
Feasiilit of meeting
ojectives after
evaluation of climate
impacts on sstem
Medium
Comments: the possiilit of otaining chestnut seedlings is high.
Other Considerations Comments: The current regulations require maintaining �ft percent of the asal area in the�lter strips of streams.
Responding to climate change impacts
The following adaptation actions (tactics) were identi�ed to help prepare for climate change impacts. ach adaptation tactic islinked to one or more Adaptation trategies and Approaches, providing connections to climate change adaptation and forestmanagement and conservation. Refer to the Adaptation Workook for a complete list of Adaptation trategies andApproaches.
Note - Tactics that are recommended can e implemented or explored further. However, some adaptation tactics might note recommended for implementation on this propert, which ma e due to a comination of arriers and drawacks orexternal factors.
Adaptation Tactic Invasive plants will e spraed pre and post harvest.
trateg Reduce the impact of iological stressors
Approach Manage herivor to promote regeneration of desired species
ene�ts of this tactic This will encourage the growth of native plants.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
none
Timeframe to implement within a ear
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Adaptation Tactic Use of uneven aged silviculture will promote diverse age classes and species
composition. The necessit to harvest hemlock and ash will e the �rst step towards
estalishment of a new cohort.
trateg Maintain and enhance species and structural diversit
Approach Promote diverse age classes
ene�ts of this tactic stalishing multiple age classes will provide a long term approach to forest sustainailit.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
none
Timeframe to implement In the next 2 ears
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Adaptation Tactic Maintain at least 50% of the asal area along streams, following the Massachusetts
current regulations.
trateg ustain fundamental ecological functions
Approach Maintain or restore riparian areas
ene�ts of this tactic Maintain shade along the stream ed, while regenerating new age classes.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
The current regulations limit removals of timer to 50% of the asal area. In situations wherehemlock is in severe decline, the residual stand will have a high mortalit rate.
Timeframe to implement In the next 2 ears
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Monitoring adaptation actions
Monitoring is critical for understanding if management actions are e�ective or if management should e altered in the futureto account for new information. The following monitoring variales were descried for this particular management ojectiveand adaptation tactics.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
Reduce the non native and native invasive plant species cover.
Monitoring Variale 1
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Reduce non native and native invasive plant species cover 80% of existing infestation.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
The invasive cover will e measured initiall post treatment and then a ear later.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
The variale is tree species composition and numer age classes.
Monitoring Variale 2
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Increase diversit within the riparian zone three species. Introduce one new age classwithin the next ten ears.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
Inventor riparian zones �ve and 10 ears post harvest.
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
The rich mesic ecosstem plant communities that are currentl present.
Monitoring Variale 3
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
The presence or asence of heraceous plants that would e associated with the rich mesiccommunit are measured.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Inventor of the understor will e conducted �ve and ten ears post harvest.
valuation of climate change impacts on goals and ojectives
Climate change might make management ojectives for this propert harder or easier to achieve, presenting challenges andopportunities. This section also includes a simple rating and description for the feasiilit of meeting management ojectivesunder current management. This is a critical step to evaluate whether management ojectives are roust, or whether anmight need to e changed.
Management Goal Protect multiple riparian zones during forest management activities.
Management Ojective Maintain soil moisture in this rich mesic ecosstem. (In the next 2 ears)
Challenges The existing road sstem currentl alters the �ow of water oth surface and susurface.Placement of new skid trails and roads ma e a�ected wetter soils during operation.
Opportunities xtreme dr periods ma o�er an opportunit to oth repair or remove older skid roads anduild more e�ective roads.
Feasiilit of meeting
ojectives after
evaluation of climate
impacts on sstem
Medium
Comments: It is di�cult to sa that soil moisture can e controlled. However, depending onweather conditions during the harvest operation opportunities ma e captured.
Other Considerations Comments: The feasiilit to do road work is linked to timer sale revenue.
Responding to climate change impacts
The following adaptation actions (tactics) were identi�ed to help prepare for climate change impacts. ach adaptation tactic islinked to one or more Adaptation trategies and Approaches, providing connections to climate change adaptation and forestmanagement and conservation. Refer to the Adaptation Workook for a complete list of Adaptation trategies andApproaches.Note - Tactics that are recommended can e implemented or explored further. However, some adaptation tactics might not
Note - Tactics that are recommended can e implemented or explored further. However, some adaptation tactics might note recommended for implementation on this propert, which ma e due to a comination of arriers and drawacks orexternal factors.
Adaptation Tactic Remove failing culverts. Replace them with ridges.
trateg ustain fundamental ecological functions
Approach Maintain or restore riparian areas
ene�ts of this tactic Replacing culverts with ridges will restore connectivit and protect stream channels.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
none
Timeframe to implement in the next ear
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Adaptation Tactic Use of uneven aged silviculture will promote diverse age classes and species
composition. The necessit to harvest hemlock and ash will e the �rst step towards
estalishment of a new cohort.
trateg Maintain and enhance species and structural diversit
Approach Promote diverse age classes
ene�ts of this tactic stalishing multiple age classes will provide a long term approach to forest sustainailit.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
none
Timeframe to implement In the next 2 ears
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Adaptation Tactic Maintain at least 50% of the asal area along streams, following the Massachusetts
current regulations.
trateg ustain fundamental ecological functions
Approach Maintain or restore riparian areas
ene�ts of this tactic Maintain shade along the stream ed, while regenerating new age classes.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
The current regulations limit removals of timer to 50% of the asal area. In situations wherehemlock is in severe decline, the residual stand will have a high mortalit rate.
Timeframe to implement In the next 2 ears
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
Monitoring adaptation actions
Monitoring is critical for understanding if management actions are e�ective or if management should e altered in the futureto account for new information. The following monitoring variales were descried for this particular management ojectiveand adaptation tactics.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
Reduce the non native and native invasive plant species cover.
Monitoring Variale 1
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Reduce non native and native invasive plant species cover 80% of existing infestation.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
The invasive cover will e measured initiall post treatment and then a ear later.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
The variale is tree species composition and numer age classes.
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
Monitoring Variale 2
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
Increase diversit within the riparian zone three species. Introduce one new age classwithin the next ten ears.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Inventor riparian zones �ve and 10 ears post harvest.
Monitoring variales
used to evaluate if tactic
is achieving desired
management
ojective(s)
The rich mesic ecosstem plant communities that are currentl present.
Monitoring Variale 3
Threshold or Criteria for
valuation of adaptation
tactic
The presence or asence of heraceous plants that would e associated with the rich mesiccommunit are measured.
Implementing
monitoring e�orts
(frequenc, time of ear,
etc)
Inventor of the understor will e conducted �ve and ten ears post harvest.
valuation of climate change impacts on goals and ojectives
Climate change might make management ojectives for this propert harder or easier to achieve, presenting challenges andopportunities. This section also includes a simple rating and description for the feasiilit of meeting management ojectivesunder current management. This is a critical step to evaluate whether management ojectives are roust, or whether anmight need to e changed.
Management Goal Protect multiple riparian zones during forest management activities.
Management Ojective Maintain at least 50% of the asal area in the riparian zone. (In the next 2 ears)
Challenges none
Opportunities N/A
Feasiilit of meeting
ojectives after
evaluation of climate
impacts on sstem
Responding to climate change impacts
The following adaptation actions (tactics) were identi�ed to help prepare for climate change impacts. ach adaptation tactic islinked to one or more Adaptation trategies and Approaches, providing connections to climate change adaptation and forestmanagement and conservation. Refer to the Adaptation Workook for a complete list of Adaptation trategies andApproaches.
Note - Tactics that are recommended can e implemented or explored further. However, some adaptation tactics might note recommended for implementation on this propert, which ma e due to a comination of arriers and drawacks orexternal factors.
Adaptation Tactic Maintain at least 50% of the asal area along streams, following the Massachusetts
current regulations.
trateg ustain fundamental ecological functions
Approach Maintain or restore riparian areas
ene�ts of this tactic Maintain shade along the stream ed, while regenerating new age classes.
Drawacks and arriers
of this tactic
The current regulations limit removals of timer to 50% of the asal area. In situations wherehemlock is in severe decline, the residual stand will have a high mortalit rate.
Timeframe to implement In the next 2 ears
Practicailit An adaptation tactic is practicale if it is oth e�ective & feasile to implement and to
ultimatel achieve desired intent.
... practicailit of tactic? High
Recommendation for
implementation
The decision to recommend a tactic ma e ased on the likelihood of success, potential
tradeo�s, cost, and other factors.
... recommend tactic? Yes
References
L. Joce, . Running, and others. 2014. National Climate Assessment - Forestr.
http://nca2014.gloalchange.gov/report/sectors/forests.
New ngland Climate Change Response Framework. http://forestadaptation.org/new-england.
C. Zganjar, . Girvetz, and others. 2009. Climate Wizard. http://www.climatewizard.org/.
Adaptation ucommittee to the Governor’s teering Committee on Climate Change. 2010. The impacts of climate change on
Connecticut agriculture, infrastructure, natural resources, and pulic health..
http://www.ct.gov/deep/li/deep/climatechange/impactsofclimatechange.pdf.
R. turrock, . Frankel, and others. 2011. Climate change and forest diseases. Plant Patholog, 60(1):133-149.
http://onlinelirar.wile.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02406.x/full.
Landscape Change Research Group. 2014. Climate Change Atlas. http://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/atlas/.
Galraith, H. 2011. Report to the NAFWA vulnerailit assessment expert panel: exposure information.
http://rcngrants.org/sites/default/�les/�nal_reports/RCN%202009-01%20Final%20Report%20-
%20Northeastern%20exposure%20data.pdf.
P. Frumho�, J. McCarth, and others. 2007. Confronting climate change in the U.. Northeast: cience, impacts, and solutions.
http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/�les/legac/assets/documents/gloal_warming/pdf/confronting-climate-change-in-the-u-
s-northeast.pdf.
J. Hellman, J. ers, and others. 2008. Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conservation
iolog, 22(3):534-543. http://onlinelirar.wile.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x/full.
M. Notaro, D. Lorenz, and others. 2014. 21st centur projections of snowfall and winter severit across central-eastern North
America. Journal of Climate, 27:6526–6550. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/as/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00520.1.
New Hampshire Climate Change Polic Task Force. 2009. The New Hampshire climate action plan: a plan for New
Hampshire’s energ, environmental and economic development future.
http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/air/ts/tps/climate/action_plan/documents/nhcap_�nal.pdf.
G. Galford, A. Hoogenoom, and others. 2014. Considering Vermont’s Future in a Changing Climate: The First Vermont
Climate Assessment. . http://dev.vtclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/VCA2014_FullReport.pdf.
J. Thompson, D. Foster, and others. 2011. The in�uence of land use and climate change on forest iomass and composition in
Massachusetts, UA. cological Applications, 21(7):2425-2444. http://onlinelirar.wile.com/doi/10.1890/10-2383.1/full.
A. Georgakakos, P. Fleming, and others. 2014. National Climate Assessment – Water.
http://nca2014.gloalchange.gov/report/sectors/water.
L. Rustad, J. Campell, and others. 2012. Changing climate, changing forests: Impacts of climate change on forests of the
northeastern United tates and eastern Canada. UDA Forest ervice Northern Research tation, GTR-NR-99:48 p.
http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pus/41165.
Rustad, L.; Campell, J.; Dukes, J..; Huntington, T.; Fallon Lamert, K.; Mohan, J.; Rodenhouse, N. 2012. Changing climate,
changing forests: The impacts of climate change on forests of the northeastern United tates and eastern Canad.
http://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pus/gtr/gtr_nrs99.pdf.
G. Jacoson, I. Fernandez, and others. 2009. Maine’s Climate Future: An Initial Assessment.
http://climatechange.umaine.edu/�les/Maines_Climate_Future.pdf.
M. Duveneck, J. Thompson, and others. 2016. Recover dnamics and climate change e�ects to future New ngland forests.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-016-0415-5.
R. ieraum, A. Lee, and others. 2014. National Climate Assessment – Adaptation.
http://nca2014.gloalchange.gov/report/response-strategies/adaptation.
K. Hahoe, C. Wake, and others. 2006. Past and future changes in climate and hdrological indicators in the U Northeast.
Climate Dnamics, 28:381-407. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-006-0187-8.
Runkle, Jennifer. 2017. NOAA National Centers For nvironmental Information, tate Climate ummaries: Maine. M-screen-
hi.pdf. https://statesummaries.ncics.org/me. https://adaptationworkook.org/sites/default/�les/resources/M-screen-hi.pdf.
K. Kunkel, L. tevens, and others. 2013. Regional climate trends and scenarios for the U.. National Climate Assessment:
Northeast U.. . http://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/technical_reports/NOAA_NDI_Tech_Report_142-1-
Climate_of_the_Northeast_U..pdf.
W. Wang, H. He, and others. 2016. Changes in forest iomass and tree species distriution under climate change in the
northeastern United tates. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pus/52485.
R. Horton, G. Yohe, and others. 2014. National Climate Assessment – Northeast.
http://nca2014.gloalchange.gov/report/regions/northeast.
R. Horton, G. Yohe, and others. 2014. National Climate Assessment - Northeast.
http://nca2014.gloalchange.gov/report/regions/northeast.
Manomet Center for Conservation ciences and National Wildlife Federation. 2012. The vulnerailities of �sh and wildlife in
the Northeast to climate change. Climate Change and Riverine Cold Water Fish Haitat in the Northeast. The Vulnerailities
of Northeastern Fish and Wildlife Haitats to ea Level Rise. http://northatlanticlcc.org/projects/vulnerailities-climate-change-
northeast-�sh-wildlife-haitats/document-the-vulnerailities-of-northeastern-�sh-and-wildlife-haitats-to-climate-change.
http://northatlanticlcc.org/projects/vulnerailities-climate-change-northeast-�sh-wildlife-haitats/�nal-report-climate-change-
and-riverine-cold-water-�sh-haitat-in-the-northeast-a-vulnerailit-assessment-review.
http://northatlanticlcc.org/projects/vulnerailities-climate-change-northeast-�sh-wildlife-haitats/the-vulnerailities-of-
northeastern-�sh-and-wildlife-haitats-to-sea-level-rise.
N. Fisichelli, A. Wright, and others. 2014. First-ear seedlings and climate change: species-speci�c responses of 15 North
American tree species. Oikos, 123(11):1331-1340. http://onlinelirar.wile.com/doi/10.1111/oik.01349/full.
J. Walsh, D. Wueles, and others. 2014. National Climate Assessment - Our Changing Climate.
http://nca2014.gloalchange.gov/report/our-changing-climate/introduction.
2015. Creating and Maintaining Resilient Forests in Vermont: Adapting Forests to Climate Change.
http://fpr.vermont.gov/sites/fpr/�les/Forest_and_Forestr/The_Forest_cosstem/Lirar/Climate%20change%20report_�nal_v6-
18-15a.pdf.
M. Arams. 2003. Where has all the white oak gone?. iocience, 53(10):927-939.
http://ioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/53/10/927.short.
C. wanston, M. Janowiak, and others. 2016. Forest Adaptation Resources: Climate change tools and approaches for land
managers, 2nd dition. UDA Forest ervice Northern Research tation, GTR-NR-87-2:161 p.
http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pus/52760.
J. Vose, D. Peterson, and others. 2012. �ects of Climate Variailit and Change on Forest cosstems: A Comprehensive
cience nthesis for the U.. Forest ector.. UDA Forest ervice Paci�c Northwest Research tation, PNW-GTR-870:265.
http://www.usda.gov/oce/climate_change/e�ects_2012/e�ects_forest.htm.
L. Ning and R. radle. 2015. now occurrence changes over the central and eastern United tates under future warming
scenarios. cienti�c Reports, 5:17073. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fsrep17073.
. Ollinger, C. Goodale, and others. 2008. Potential e�ects of climate change and rising CO2 on ecosstem processes in
northeastern U.. forests. Mitigation and Adaptation trategies for Gloal Change, 13(5):467-485.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11027-007-9128-z.
P. Gro�man, P. Kareiva, and others. 2014. National Climate Assessment - cosstems.
http://nca2014.gloalchange.gov/report/sectors/ecosstems.
R. Kopp, R. Horton, and others. 2014. Proailistic 21st and 22nd centur sea-level projections at a gloal network of tide-
gauge sites. arth's Future, 2:383-406. http://onlinelirar.wile.com/doi/10.1002/2014F000239/full.
M. Janowiak, A. D'Amato, and others. New ngland and New York forest ecosstem vulnerailit assessment and snthesis: a
report from the New ngland Climate Change R. http://www.forestadaptation.org/new-england/vulnerailit-assessment.
American Forest Foundation. MLandPlan.org. http://mlandplan.org/.
P. Frumho� , J. McCarth, and others. Confronting Climate Change in the U.. Northeast: cience, Impacts, and olutions..
Union of Concerned cientists, 2007:146 p. http://www.ucsusa.org/gloal_warming/science_and_impacts/impacts/northeast-
climate-impacts.html#.VL5c0fF-6V.
P. Gro�man, L. Rustad, and others. 2012. Long-term integrated studies show complex and surprising e�ects of climate change
in the northern hardwood forest. iocience, 62(12):1056-1066. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pus/46691.
Adaptation ucommittee to the Governor’s teering Committee on Climate Change. 2010. The impacts of climate change on
Connecticut agriculture, infrastructure, natural resources, and pulic health..
http://www.ct.gov/deep/li/deep/climatechange/impactsofclimatechange.pdf.
D. Lorenz and M. Notaro. 2014. LCC tatistical Downscaling. http://ccr.aos.wisc.edu/resources/data_scripts/LCC/.
C. Dreer, Y. ergeron, and others. 2009. �ects of climate on occurrence and size of large �res in a northern hardwood
landscape. Applied Vegetation cience, 12:261–272. http://onlinelirar.wile.com/doi/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2009.01035.x/full.
A. Weed, M. Ares, and others. 2013. Consequences of climate change for iotic disturances in North American forests.
cological Monographs, 83(4):441-470. http://onlinelirar.wile.com/doi/10.1890/13-0160.1/full.
T. Huntington, D. Richardson, and others. 2009. Climate and hdrological changes in the northeastern United tates.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39:199-212. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/as/10.1139/x08-116.
Anderson, M.G.; Clark, M.; Ferree, C.; Jospe, A.; Olivero heldon, A.; Weaver, K. 2013. Northeast haitat guides: A companion
to the terrestrial and aquatic haitat maps. .
http://rcngrants.org/sites/default/�les/news_�les/Northeast%20Aquatic%20and%20Terrestrial%20Haitat%20Guide.pdf.