17 central mucoepidermoid - aligarh muslim university · tumor or odontogenic tumor was ruled out...
TRANSCRIPT
ABSTRACT : Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a malignant neoplasm of the
salivary glands. It majorly arises in the parotid gland followed by minor salivary glands but
rarely develops intraosseously. Primary intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the
jaw bones is extremely rare. Literature search has revealed that very few cases have been
reported to date. Moreover, Primary intraosseous mucoepidermoidcarcinoma affects
females twice more frequently than males. The present report illustrates the clinical
,radiographic and histological features of a rare case of a primary central mucoepidermoid
carcinoma of the mandible in a 16 year old male patient. Central Salivary gland tumors
should be included in the differential diagnosis of unilocular and multilocular radiolucent
lesions of the jaws. Timely diagnosis and prompt management is important.
2 3 41Radhika Rai, Aparna Dave, Manpreet Arora, V.P.Shetty.1 2,3,4Assistant Professor, Professor, Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurgaon
INTRODUCTION :
Salivary gland neoplasms constitute about 6 % of all head and
neck tumors1. Most salivary gland tumors arise in the parotid
gland while the remaining in submandibular, sublingual,
minor salivary glands and other rare sites1 . Besides the
occurrence of these tumors in the usual sites of major and
minor salivary glands, rarely they may also arise in ectopic
tissue sites. Ectopic salivary gland tissue has been found in the
jaws, lips, buccal mucosa, tongue ,skin, mastoid bone, middle
ear , nasopharynx, pharynx and trachea[2]. The primary
occurrence of salivary gland tumors at these unusual sites are
often a diagnostic challenge for the dental practioners.
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma comprises 5 –10% of all salivary
gland tumors and generally arises in the salivary glands.[3,4]
Stewart et al described its mucous secreting and epidermal
cellular elements thus establishing it as a distinct pathological
entity.[5] Mucoepidermoid carcinoma majorly involves the
parotid gland (89.6%), followed by sub mandibular(8.4 %)
and sublingual glands (0.4%) .6, 7The palate is the most
common site for minor salivary gland involvement,
accounting for 41.1% of intraoral lesions.[ 6,7]
Aberrant salivary gland neoplasms arising within the jaws as
primary central bony lesions are extremely rare comprising
2–3% of all mucoepidermoid carcinomas reported.[8] A
review of literature reveals that it generally occurs in the
fourth and fifth decades of life while only a few cases have
been reported in young patients[9]. The present report
illustrates one such rare case of a primary central
mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the mandible in a teenager.
CASE REPORT: A 16 year old male patient of Indian origin
reported with the complaint of pain and swelling on the left
side of his face for the last 2 months. The patient also had
difficulty in opening the mouth.
CENTRAL MUCOEPIDERMOID CARCINOMA OF MANDIBLE IN A TEENAGER: CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE.
Dental Sciences
Key Words : primary intraosseousmucoepidermoid carcinoma; salivary gland ; mandible.
Source of support : NoneConflict of interest: Nil.
University Journal of Dental Sciences, An Official Publication of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. India 76
University J Dent Scie 2016; No. 2, Vol. 2
CaseReport
Journal of University
Dental Sciences
The patient was apparently well 2 months back when he
observed a small swelling on the left side of his face. The
swelling slowly increased in size. Soon after, the patient also
experienced pain in the same area. The pain was gradual in
onset, mild in nature, continuous and radiating .He then
visited a local dentist for the same following which the
extraction of 37 was done. There was no relief. Instead the
swelling rapidly increased in size.
There was no significant past medical history, family history
or personal history. On general examination, the patient was
found to be moderately built and nourished and all vital signs
were within normal range.
Extraoral examination revealed a single diffuse swelling on
left side of face extending superior-inferiorly from outer
canthus of eye to inferior border of mandible and medio-
laterally from ala of nose to tragus of ear(Figure 1).
Figure . Profile photograph of patient
Left submandibular lymph nodes were palpable, tender, firm
and not freely movable. Intraoral examination revealed an ill
defined ulcer with rolled out everted margins extending from
mandibular left second premolar to retromolar region . There
was also reduced mouth opening (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Intra Oral photograph revealing swelling extending
from 35 to retromolar region with buccal cortical plate
expansion and reduced mouth opening.
Panoramic & PA view radiographs revealed a well defined,
multilocular radiolucency involving left posterior body, angle
and ramus region of mandible extending anteriorly from the
medial aspect of mandibular left second premolar to posterior
border of ramus and inferiorly from lower border of mandible
to superiorly involving coronoid and condylar process. The
cortex of inferior border of mandible at posterior body, angle
and ramus region was thinned out. Internal body septations
were present giving the radiolucency a multilocular
appearance with formation of spider web and various soap
bubble like compartments. The root apices of mesial and
distal roots of 36 showed resorption, 28 was pushed
superiorly at the condylar region with complete resorption of
coronoid process and condylar regions. (Figure 3 & 4)
Figure 3.Panoramic radiograph showing radiolucency from
medial aspect of 35 to posterior border of ramus, inferiorly
from lower border of mandible to superiorly involving
coronoid and condylar process.
Figure 4.Posterio Anterior view showing the thinning of
cortex of inferior border of mandible .
On microscopic examination, the H& E stained tissue section
showed islands of tumor cells invading connecting tissue
stroma. The cells seen were polygonal epidermoid like with
hyperchromatic nuclei. Areas of mucous cells with pale
foamy cytoplasm along with sheets of clear cells were also
evident. Mucin filled cystic spaces could also be appreciated.
The surrounding connective tissue exhibited collagen fibres,
blood vessels and extravasated RBCs. The features suggested
University Journal of Dental Sciences, An Official Publication of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. India 77
University J Dent Scie 2016; No. 2, Vol. 2
of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma. (Figure 5 &6)
Figure 5. Sheets of epidermoid and mucous cells ( H& E X40)
Figure 6. Areas showing clear cells along with Sheets of
epidermoid and mucous cells ( H& E X40)
DISCUSSION :
Primary central mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a rare lesion,
first described by Lepp in 1939[10] .
Central MEC affects females twice more frequently than
males and involves the mandible twice more often than the
maxilla with a predilection for the premolar-molar area[7,11].
It has been reported in all ages ranging from 1 to 78 years, with
the majority of cases occurring in the 4th and 5th decades of
life [12]. Its occurrence in children is rare.
Literature search has revealed that a very few cases have been
reported in puberty, suggesting a hormonal influence on
salivary glands[11]. The present case also reports the
occurrence of a Primary Central MEC in a 16 year old patient.
Clinically, the main symptoms are swelling and pain with
trismus, paresthesia and occasionally tooth mobility. [13,14]
Radiographic features are usually a well circumscribed
unilocular/multilocular radiolucency.
The chances of its central origin are more when the tumour is
in the mandible, since such lesions in maxilla may actually
arise from the submucosal mucous secreting glands in the
antrum, or represent intraosseous extension of minor salivary
gland tumours of the sinus mucosa. [15]
Regarding its pathogenesis four possible origins have been
described which include 1.)entrapment of retro molar mucous
glands within the mandible, which subsequently undergo
neoplastic transformation; 2).developmentally induced
embryonic remnants of the sub-maxillary gland within the
mandible;3). neoplastic transformation of the mucous
secreting cells commonly found in the pluripotent epithelial
lining of dentigerous cysts associated with impacted third
molars; and 4) neoplastic transformation and invasion from
the lining of the maxillary sinus.[16]
Several authors have suggested criteria required for diagnosing
a lesion as a central MEC, independent of whether it arises from
an odontogenic cyst or tumor. The most commonly accepted
criteria for diagnosis proposed by Alexander et al17.and
modified by Browand and Waldron[18 ] is:
1. Intact cortical plates (However, cortical perforation does
not exclude PIOC type 4)
2. Radiographic evidence of bony destruction
3. Exclusion of another primary tumour that in its
metastasis could histologically mimic the central tumour
4. Exclusion of an odontogenic tumour
5. Histopathological confirmation
6. Detectable intracellular mucin.
The case presented here had thinned out yet intact cortical
plates, evident bony destruction, the presence of any primary
tumor or odontogenic tumor was ruled out .The histological
picture confirmed the lesion and intracellular mucin was
detectable.
Brookstone and Huvos10, 13 suggested a three-grade
classification for intraosseous MEC Grade 1, without
expansion and rupture of cortical plate; grade 2, with
expansion but without rupture of cortical plate; grade 3, with
rupture of cortical plates or presence of regional metastasis.
Most central mucoepidermoid carcinomas have a good
prognosis, the preferred treatment of choice is wide surgical
excision with clear margins. Brookstone and Huvos13, 14
reported that among 64 patients with mandibular
mucoepidermoid carcinoma, [32] were treated conservatively
and 32 were treated radically. In the first group, there were 13
recurrences (40%) whereas there were only 4 recurrences
(13%) of the tumors treated radically. This suggests that
radical resection offers the best chance of tumor eradication
and prevention of local recurrence and late distant metastasis.
CONCLUSION :
Although central salivary gland tumors are relatively
uncommon but they should always be included in the
differential diagnosis of unilocular and multilocular
radiolucent lesions of the jaws. The clinical significance of
University Journal of Dental Sciences, An Official Publication of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. India 78
University J Dent Scie 2016; No. 2, Vol. 2
malignant tumors arising from odontogenic cysts or de novo
should never be underestimated as illustrated by the present
case. A prompt biopsy must always be done for all
intraosseous, radiolucent lesions followed by a careful
histopathological evaluation of the excised tissue so that such
cases may be identified and treated effectively.
Radical surgery along with the adjuvant treatment must be
done. After the surgical procedure, post operative
radiotherapy and follow up examinations is advised to avoid
local recurrence and late distant metastasis. If identified,
treated and managed effectively, the overall prognosis of
Central MEC is good.
REFERENCES :
1. Audrey Rousseau, Cécile Badoual. Head and neck:
Salivary gland tumors: An Overview. Atlas of
Genetics and Cytogenetics in oncology and
Hematology ; 2010.
2. Donald E. Ross and Anthony E. Sukis.Salivary
gland tumors in ectopic sites: The Laryngoscope
1971;81(4): 558–564.
3. Seifert G. Histological typing of salivary glands
tumors. World health organization international
histological classification of tumors. 2nd ed.
Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1991.
4. Kochajia N, Goossensb A, Bottenberga P. Central
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: case report, literature
review for missing and available information and
guideline proposal for coming case reports. Oral
Oncology Extra .2004; 40: 95–105.
5. S t e w a r t F W , F o o t e F W , B e c k e r W F .
Mucoepidermoid tumors of Salivary Glands. Ann
Surg 1945; 122: 820–5.
6. Eversole LR Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: Review
of 815 reported cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol1970, 28:490-495.
7. Simon D, Somanathan T, Ramdas K and Pandey M.
Central Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of mandible –
A case report and review of the literature. World
Journal of Surgical Oncology 2003;1:1.
8. Gingell JC, Beckerman T, Levy BA and Snider. LA
Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Review of
literature and report of a case associated with an
apical periodontal cyst. Oral Med Oral Surg and
Oral Pathol1984, 57:436-440.
9. Baj A , Bertolini F, Ferrari S, Sesenn E, Central
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Jaw in a
Teenager: A Case Report J Oral MaxillofacSurg
2002; 60:207-211.
10. Lepp H ZurKenntnis des papillarwachsendens -
chleimigencystadenokarzinoms der mundhohle.
ZieglersBeitrage Z PatholAnat1939, 102:164-166.
11. Ezsias A, Sugar AW, Milling MAP and Ashley KF
Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a child. J
Oral MaxillofacSurg1994, 52:512-515.
12. Pires FR, Paes de Almeida O, Lopes MA, Elias da.
Cruz Pe rez D , Kowal sk i LP . Cen t r a l
mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the mandible: report
of four cases with long term follow up. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:378-82.
13. Brookstone MS, Huvos AG. Central salivary gland
tumors of the maxilla and mandible: a
clinicopathologic study of 11 cases with an analysis
of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
1992;50:229-36.
14. Sankireddy S, Kaushik A, Vijaychander V et al.
Intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the
mandible – a rare case report. RSBO RevistaSul-
Brasileira de Odontologia, 2014; 11(4): 401-404.
15. Waldron CA and Koh ML Central mucoepidermoid
carcinomaof the jaws: report of four cases with
analysis of the literatureand discussion of the
r e l a t i o n s h i p t o m u c o e p i d e r m o i d ,
sialodontogenic,and glandular odontogenic cysts. J
Oral MaxillofacSurg1990, 48:871-877.
16. Shafer WG, Hine MK and Levy BM Text book of
Oral Pathology. Philadelphia W B Saunders 1974,
225-231.
17. Alexander RW, Dupuis RH and Holton H Central
mucoepidermoid tumor (carcinoma) of the
mandible. J Oral Surg1974, 32:541-547.
18. Browand BC and Waldron CA. Central
mucoepidermoid tumors of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol1975, 40:631-643.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Radhika Rai
House No. 174, Sector 11 –D, Faridabad, Haryana.
E mail : [email protected]
University Journal of Dental Sciences, An Official Publication of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. India 79
University J Dent Scie 2016; No. 2, Vol. 2