15th symposium on · 2008. 7. 15. · p1.11 variation of the cloud-topped boundary layer height...

15th Symposium on

Boundary Layers and Turbulence

15-19 July, 2002

UNlVERSiTATSBiBLiOTHEKHANNOVER-

TECHNISCHE

INF0RMATI0NSBS3U0THEKWageningen, the Netherlands

sponsored by

American Meteorological Society

cosponsored by

Wageningen University's Department of Meteorology and Air Quality

Front Cover:The front cover shows a map of the Netherlands. The different inserts show typical landscapes, and locations where observations

are (and have been) taken to gain more understanding of the atmospheric boundary layer and the exchange processes of energy, water vapor,carbon-dioxide, momentum, air pollutants, et cetera, between the atmosphere and the land surface over different types of terrain. In additionto the continuous field observations and the special experiments, many scientists and research groups in the Netherlands deal with the

simulation, modeling, and parameterization of the atmospheric boundary layer. Much of the ongoing work is presented at this conference.

Starting with Wageningen, the insert at the right hand shows the Haarweg weather station, which is operated by the Meteorology and Air QualityGroup at Wageningen University for educational and research purposes (see http//: www.met.wageningen-ur.nl). The other insert gives a

photograph (courtesy Ida Blok) of the landscape around Wageningen in the direction of the city of Rhenen (known for its 'Dutch mountains').

The next two inserts in the clockwise direction, deal with the 213 meter operational tower at Cabauw (courtesy Gerard van der Vliet). This towerand its surrounding facilities is operated by the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI; see http//: www.knml.nl). The upper insert

at Cabauw shows a photo of a 'large-aperture-scintillometer' over the surrounding landscape. This instrument provides an estimate for the

sensible heat flux on a scale up to 10 kilometers in heterogeneous terrain. The validity of this type of instrument was first tested in the flat but

heterogeneous terrain of the Flevopolder,(the subsequent insert in the clockwise direction).

The next insert shows a tower over one ofthe Veluwe forest sites ('Loobos'), as operated by the Land-Atmosphere Interactions group at Alterra

since 1995 (now part of Euroflux).

Sponsorship for the cover image was provided by the Meteorology and Air Quality Group at Wageningen University.

All Rights Reserved, No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, Including photocopying,

taping, orinformation storage and retrieval systems—without the priorwritten permission of the publisher. ContactAMSfor permission pertaining to the overall collection.

Authors retain their individual rights and should be contacted directly for permission to use their material separately. The manuscripts reproduced herein are unrefereed

papers presented at the J5" Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence. Their appearance in this collection does not constitute formal publication.

UB/TIB Hannover 89

123 321 131...

American Meteoroiobicai Society

45 Beacon Street, Boston, Massachosetfs USA 02108-3bvaP

Table of Contents

15th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

page

SESSION 1: OPENING SESSION

SESSION 2: ENERGY BALANCE AND SURFACE FLUX OBSERVATIONAL METHODS AND STUDIES

1 2.1 THE ENERGY BALANCE EXPERIMENT EBEX-20OO. Steven P. Oncley, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and T. Foken, R.

Vogt, C. Bernhofer, W. Kohsiek, H. Liu, A. Pitacco, D. Grantz, L. Riberio, and T. Weidinger

5 2.2 RENAISSANCE OF SCINTILLOMETRY. Henk A. R. de Bruin, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, WageningenUniv., Wageningen, the Netherlands

8 2.3 THE APPLICABILITY OF THE SCINTILLATION METHOD OVER HETEROGENEOUS AREAS. Wouter M. L.

Meijninger, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and W.

Kohsiek and H. A. R. de Bruin

12 2.4 USE OF THE R.E.A TECHNIQUE TO MEASURE SCALAR FLUXES ON GROUND-BASED AND MOBILE

PLATFORM. Aurore Brut, CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse, France; and D. Legain, P. Durand, P. Laville, A.

Fotiadi, and D. Serga

16 2.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF AXIS ROTATION FOR EDDY-COVARIANCE MEASUREMENTS. Arnold F. Moene, Meteorologyand Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and 0. K. Hartogensis, B. G.

Heusinkveld, W. M. L. Meijninger, and A. van Dijk

20 2.6 INFERRING LEAF EMERGENCE AND ESTIMATING EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FROM EDDY COVARIANCE

MEASUREMENTS AND RUNOFF RECORDS. Matthew J. Czikowsky, Univ. at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY; and D.

R. Fitzjarrald, R. M. Staebler, and R. K. Sakai

24 2.7 OBSERVATIONS AND MODEL RESULTS FOR WATER VAPOR AND CARBON DIOXIDE FLUXES ABOVE A

SPARSELY VEGETATED BOG AREA. Adrie F. G. Jacobs, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wagenigen Univ.,Wageningen, the Netherlands; and R. J. Ronda and A. A. M. Holtslag

27 2.8 EDDY SAMPLING METHODS, A COMPARISON USING SIMULATION RESULTS. Johannes Ruppert, Univ. of

Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany; and B. Wichura, A. Delany, and T. Foken

SESSION 3: CONVECTIVE BLS

31 3.1 DYNAMICS OF CONVECTIVE ENTRAINMENT IN A HETEROGENEOUSLY STRATIFIED ATMOSPHERE WITH

WIND SHEAR. Robert Conzemius, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and E. Fedorovich

35 3.2 THE SHEAR CONTRIBUTION TO THE EVOLUTION OF A CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. David Pino, Institute

for Space Studies of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain; and P. G. Duynkerke and J. Vila-Guerau de Arellano

39 3.3 EFFECTS OF INITIAL TEMPERATURE AND VELOCITY PERTURBATIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF

CONVECTION IN THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Evgeni Fedorovich, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK;and R. Conzemius

43 3.4 TURBULENT STRUCTURES IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER, SUCH AS PLUMES AND PUFFS, IN

RELATION TO THE THERMAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SURFACE. F. T. M. Nieuwstadt, Delft Univ. of

Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; and J. C. R. Hunt and H. S. Fernando

45 3.5 BROADENING OF CONVECTIVE CELLS DURING COLD AIR OUTBREAKS: A HIGH RESOLUTION STUDY USING

A PARALLELIZED LES MODEL. Michael Schroter, Univ. of Hannover, Hannover, Germany; and S. Raasch

49 3.6 EVALUATION OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BOUNDARY-LAYER HEIGHT AND HEAT FLUX. Janus W.

Schipper, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and W. M. Angevlne, A, B. White, and T. Myers

* Manuscript not available v

Table qf contents

15th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

PAGE

53 3.7 AIR MASS TRANSFORMATION OVER THE SEA OF JAPAN DURING COLD-AIR OUTBREAKS REVEALED BY

AIRCRAFT OBSERVATIONS. Jun Inoue, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, Japan; and M. Kawashima, Y. Fujiyoshi, and

M. Yoshizaki

55 3.8 EDDY-DIFFUSIVITY AND CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS: A NEW MIXING LENGTH FORMULATION. Jo3o

Teixeira, UCAR Visiting Scientist, NRL, Monterey, CA; and S. Cheinet

POSTER SESSION PI: CLOUDY AND CONVECTIVE BLS

P1.1 SHIP-BASED EXPLORATORY OBSERVATIONS OF THE SE PACIFIC STRATOCUMULUS-CAPPED BOUNDARY

LAYER DURING EPIC 2001. Christopher S. Bretherton, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA; and K. Comstock, S.

Yuter, T. Uttal, and 0 W. Fairall

59 P1.2 SIZE STATISTICS OF CUMULUS CLOUD POPULATIONS IN LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS. Roel A. J. Neggers,KNMI, De Bllt, the Netherlands; and H. J. J. Jonker and A. P. Siebesma

63 P1.3 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CLOUDS DIURNAL EVOLUTION IN THE PBL. N. Kitova, Institute of

Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria; and K. Ivanova, M. A. Mikhalev, and M. Ausloos

66 P1.4 TETHERED-BALLOONE BORNE MEASUREMENTS OF THE FINE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF BOUNDARY LAYER

CLOUDS. Holger Siebert, Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany; and M. Wendisch

70 P1.5 THE FORMATION OF VERTICAL VORTICES IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. Katharine M. Kanak,CIMMS/Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and D. K. Lilly and J. T. Snow

74 P1.6 TURBULENCE STRUCTURE OF THE ASTEX FIRST LAGRANGIAN BOUNDARY AND CLOUD LAYER. Michael

TjemstrSm, Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Sweden; and A. Rune

78 P1.7 TRIGGERING MECHANISMS OF BOUNDARY LAYER CONVECTIONS OVER THE TAIWAN AREA IN SPRING

SEASON. Tai-Hwa Hor, Chung Cheng Inst, of Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan; and C.-H, Wei and M.-H. Chang

82 P1.8 TURBULENT FLUXES, TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY CONVERGENCE AFTER SUNRISE. Rodrigo Silva,Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; and 0. C. Acevedo, 0. Moraes, D. R. Fitzjarrald,R. K. Sakai, M. Czikowsky, and R. Staebler

84 P1.9 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESSES OF STRATOCUMULUS BREAK-UP IN THE COASTAL REGION. Qing Wang,NPS, Monterey, CA; and D. L. Rosenberg and S. Wang

88 P1.10 USE OF SIMULTANEOUS RADAR AND LIDAR DATA FOR THE RETRIEVAL OF MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS

IN LOW-LEVEL WATER CLOUDS. Oleg A. Krasnov, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; and H. W.

J. Russchenberg

P1.11 VARIATION OF THE CLOUD-TOPPED BOUNDARY LAYER HEIGHT NEAR THE CALIFORNIA COAST-

OBSERVATIONS FROM DECS. Qing Wang, NPS, Monterey, CA; and I. A. Kalogiros and S. Wang

92 P1.12 TURBULENCE CLOSURE AND CLOUD DYNAMICS' IN CLOUD-RESOLVING SIMULATIONS OF BOUNDARY-

LAYER CLOUD REGIMES. Anning Cheng, Hampton Univ. and NASA/LRC, Hampton, VA; and K.-M. Xu

96 P1.13 SELF-SIMILARITY CONSTRAINTS FOR CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS. Jianjun Duan, Univ. of California,Los Angeles, CA; and B. Stevens

98 P1.14 NONLINEAR SCALE INTERACTIONS IN LAKE-EFFECT CLOUDS. Natasha L Miles, Penn State Univ., UniversityPark, PA; and J. Verlinde

P1.15 PAPER WITHDRAWN

102 P1.16 AIRCRAFT OBSERVATIONS OF AIR MASS TRANSFORMATION OVER ADVANCING ICE COVER IN THE SEA OF

OKHOTSK. Jun Inoue, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, Japan; and M. Kawashima, Y. Fujiyoshi, and M. Wakatsuchi

*

Manuscript not available VI

Table of Contents

15 Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

pagj

104 P1.17 COHERENCE OF VERTICAL VELOCITY FROM A ZENITH-POINTING DOPPLER LIDAR. Shane D. Mayor, NCAR,Boulder, CO; and D. H, Lenschow

P1.18 COMPARISON OF PARAMETERIZED CLOUD VARIABILITY TO ARM DATA. Stephen A. Klein, NOAA/GFDL,Princeton, NJ; and J. R. Norris

108 P1.19 EFFECTS OF DOMAIN SIZE AND NUMERICAL RESOLUTION ON THE SIMULATION OF SHALLOW CUMULUSCONVECTION. David E. Stevens, LLNL, Livermore, CA

112 P1.20 ESTIMATING DIVERGENCE AND VORTICITY FROM AIRCRAFT DATA IN THE STRATOCUMULUS TOPPED

BOUNDARY LAYER. Verica Savic-Jovcic, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA; and B. Stevens and D. H.

Lenschow

P1.21 INTERACTIONS OF DEEP CUMULUS CONVECTION AND THE BOUNDARY LAYER OVER THE SOUTHERNGREAT PLAINS. Steven K. Krueger, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; and M. A. Jenkins, S. M. Lazarus, Y. Luo,and K.-M. Xu

114 P1.22 MASSFLUX BUDGETS OF SHALLOW CUMULUS CLOUDS. Stephan R. de Roode, Univ. of Washington, Seattle,WA; and C. S. Bretherton

118 P1.23 MODELING THE CLOUD-TOPPED MARINE PBL; TURBULENCE INFLUENCE ON THE CONDENSATIONAL

GROWTH. Gunilla Svensson, Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Sweden; and J. H. Seinfeld

120 P1.24 OBSERVATIONS OF THE MORNING TRANSITION OF THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. Wayne M.

Angevine, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado and NOAA/AL, Boulder, CO; and H. Klein Baltink and F. C. Bosveld

POSTER SESSION P2: OBSERVATIONAL METHODS

121 P2.1 INFLUENCES OF SURFACE HETEROGENEITY ON TOWER-BASED FLUX MEASUREMENTS. Weiguo Wang, Penn

State Univ., University Park, PA; and K. J. Davis

125 P2.2 LONG RANGE SCINTILLOMETRY. William Kohsiek, KNMI, De Bilt, the Netherlands; and W. M. L. Meijningerand H.A. R. de Bruin

129 P2.3 RE-EVALUATION OF INTEGRAL TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR PARAMETERISATIONS.

Christoph Thomas, Univ. of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany; and T. Foken

133 P2.4 REMOTE SENSING OF THE LATE-SUMMER BOUNDARY LAYER NEAR THE NORTH POLE. P. Ola G. Persson,

CIRES/NOAA/ETL, Boulder, CO; and S. Abbott, M. L. Jensen, B. Larsson, V. Leuski, A. Targino, M. Tjernstrom,and A. White

137 P2.5 SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF EDDY COVARIANCE MEASUREMENTS: A COMPARISON OF TWO IDENTICAL EDDY

CORRELATION SYSTEMS IN ADJACENT PLOTS. Jon Warland, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; and K.

Taillon

139 P2.6 THE INFLUENCE OF PULSE-FIRING DELAYS ON SONIC ANEMOMETER RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS.

Morten Nielsen, Ris0 National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark; and S. E. Larsen

143 P2.7 THE SURFACE ENERGY BALANCE OVER A DESERT, AND THE RELEVANCE OF SOIL HEAT FLUX

MEASUREMENTS. Bert G. Heusinkveld, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen,the Netherlands; and A. F. G. Jacobs, A. A. M. Holtslag, and S. M. Berkowicz

147 P2.8 INFLUENCE OF THE AIRFLOW DISTORTION ON AIR-SEA FLUX MEASUREMENTS ABOARD RESEARCH

VESSEL: RESULTS OF PHYSICAL SIMULATIONS APPLIED TO THE EQUALANT99 EXPERIMENT. Aurore Brut,

CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse, France; and A. Butet, S. Planton, P, Durand, and G. Caniaux

* Manuscript not available VII

table of Contents

PAGE

151 P2.9

155 P2.10

15M SYMPOSIUM ON BOUNDARY LAYERS AND TURBULENCE

AN AIRBORNE DISJUNCT EDDY COVARIANCE SYSTEM; SAMPLING STRATEGY AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN.

Janne Rinne, CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse, France; and P. Durand and A. Guenther

BOUNDARY LAYER PROFILES OF AEROSOL SIZE DISTRIBUTION OBTAINED BY KITES AND A TETHERED

BALLOON DURING THE ARCTIC OCEAN EXPEDITION (AOE-2001). Michael L. Jensen, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado,Boulder, CO; and C. Leek, A. Targino, B. Wehner, C. Fischer, and E. Swietlicki

159 P2.11 DISPLACED-BEAM SMALL APERTURE SCINTILLOMETER TEST: CASES-99 STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER

EXPERIMENT. Oscar K. Hartogensis, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the

Netherlands; and H. A. R. de Bruin

163 P2.12 FETCH AND FOOTPRINT CONSIDERATIONS DURING MEASUREMENT OF TRACE GAS EMISSIONS: A

REFINERY LANDFARM CASE STUDY. Sandra Ausma, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; and G. C. Edwards

and T. J. Gillespie

167 P2.13 FINDING BOUNDARY LAYER TOP FOR THE STABLE LAYER: APPLICATION OF A HAAR WAVELET

COVARIANCE TRANSFORM TO LIDAR OBSERVATIONS. Ian M. Brooks, SlO/Univ. of California, La Jolla, CA

P2.14 FLUX FOOTPRINTS OVER CANOPIES WITH VARYING STRUCTURE AND DENSITY. Tiina Markkanen, Univ. of

Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and 0. Rannlk and T. Vesala

171 P2.15 IMPROVED TURBULENT FLUX CALCULATIONS. Dean Vickers, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR; and L. Mahrt

SESSION 4: DUYNKERKE MEMORIAL

175 4.1 REMEMBERING PETER DUYNKERKE. Albert A. M. Holtslag, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, WageningenUniv., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and S. R. de Roode

4.2 SCIENTIFIC HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE GCSS BOUNDARY LAYER CLOUD WORKING GROUP UNDER PETERDUYNKERKE'S LEADERSHIP. Christopher S. Bretherton, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA

4.3 INTREPID INVESTIGATIONS OF CLOUD TOPPPED BOUNDARY LAYERS. Bjorn Stevens, Univ. of California, LosAngeles, CA

177 4.4 LES: HOW LARGE IS LARGE ENOUGH? Peter G. Duynkerke, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research,Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, the Netherlands; and H. J. J. Jonker and S. R. de Roode

183 4.5 THE ROLE OF THE FILTER IN THE FILTERED NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION. Arjan van Dijk, Utrecht Univ.,Utrecht, the Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke

187 4.6 COUNTERGRADIENT FLUXES IN THE CLEAR CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER: THE ROLE OF THEENTRAINMENT FLUX. Stephan R. de Roode, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, the Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke and

H.J. J. Jonker

191 4.7 THE TOTAL WATER BUDGET OF NOCTURNAL STRATOCUMULUS. Margreet C. vanZanten, Univ. of California,Los Angeles, CA; and B. Stevens, G. Vali, and D. Lenschow

193 4.8 CUMULUS PROPERTIES FROM AIRCRAFT AND SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS. Stefaan M. A. Roclts, UtrechtUniv., Utrecht, the Netherlands; and H. J. J. Jonker and P. G, Duynkerke

SESSION 5: CLOUDY BLS

197 5.1 ENTRAINMENT IN NOCTURNAL STRATOCUMULUS. Bjorn Stevens, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA; and D,H. Lenschow, I. Faloona, V. Savic-Jovcic, and M. vanZanten

199 5.2 SHALLOW CUMULUS CONVECTION: VALIDATION OF LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION AGAINST AIRCRAFT ANDLANDSAT OBSERVATIONS. R. A. J. Neggers, KNMI, De Bilt, the Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke and S. M. A.Rodts

*

Manuscript not available viii

Table of Contents

15Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

page

203 5.3 RETRIEVAL OF BOUNDARY LAYER CLOUD PROPERTIES USING INFRARED SATELLITE DATA DURING THE

DYCOMS-II FIELD EXPERIMENT. Juan C. Perez, Universidad de La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain; and P. H.

Austin and A. Gonzolaz

205 5.4 OBSERVATIONS OF STRATOCUMULUS ENTRAINMENT IN THE COASTAL ZONE. John Kalogiros, National

Observatory of Athens, Athens, Greece and NPS, Monterey, CA; and Q. Wang

209 5.5 ENTRAINMENT AND LARGE EDDY STRUCTURE IN CLOUDY BOUNDARY LAYERS. David C. Lewellen, West

Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV; and W. S. Lewellen

5.6 PAPER WITHDRAWN

213 5.7 DIURNAL CYCLES OF A MARINE SC LAYER AND CU OVER LAND SIMULATED WITH A TKE SCHEME USING A

UNIFIED FORMULATION OF THE MIXING LENGTH. E. Sanchez, Institute Nacional de Meteorologia, Madrid,

Spain; and J. Cuxart

5.8 A NEW SUBCLOUD MODEL FOR CONVECTION PARAMETERIZATION. A.P. Siebesma, KNMI, De Bilt, the

Netherlands; and C. Jakob, J. Teixeira, and P. Soares

215 5.9 AN EXAMINATION OF A UNIFIED CLOUDINESS-TURBULENCE SCHEME WITH VARIOUS TYPES OF CLOUDY

BOUNDARY LAYERS. Jocelyn Mailhot, MSC, Dorval, QC, Canada; and S. B6lair

219 5.10 SIMILARITY OF DEEP VS. SHALLOW CONVECTION AS REVEALED BY A THREE-DIMENSIONAL CLOUD-

RESOLVING MODEL. Marat F. Khairoutdinov, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO; and D. A. Randall

221 5.11 A SPECTRAL MODEL FOR THE COHERENT STRUCTURES IN THE DRY AND MOIST CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY

LAYERS. Sylvain Cheinet, Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique, Paris, France

5.12 MESOSCALE SIMULATIONS OF STRATOCUMULUS-TOPPED BOUNDARY LAYERS AND COMPARISONS WITH

AIRCRAFT OBSERVATIONS. Qing Wang, NPS, Monterey, CA; and T. Chang and S. Wang

225 5.13 A DIAGNOSTIC STUDY OF EPISODIC MIXING MODELS OF SHALLOW CUMULUS CLOUDS. Ming Zhao, Univ. of

British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and P. H. Austin

SESSION 6: CHEMICAL PROCESSES AND DISPERSION

227 6.1 FLUXES AND (CO-)VARIANCES OF REACTING SCALARS IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. Jean-

Frangois Vinuesa, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and J.

Vila-Guerau de Arellano

233 6.2 INITIAL APPLICATION OF A COUPLED LES-PHOTOCHEMICAL MODEL TO EXAMINE NEAR-SOURCE OZONE

PRODUCTION FROM INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS. Jerold A. Herwehe, NOAA/ARL/ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN; and R. T.

McNiderand R. K. Decker

237 6.3 THE EFFECT OF NORTH FOEHN ON BOUNDARY LAYER OZONE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE PO BASIN. Markus

Furger, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen PSI, Switzerland; and A. S. H. Pr6v6t and R. 0. Weber

239 6.4 FIRST MEASUREMENTS OF H202 AND ORGANIC PEROXIDES SURFACE FLUXES BY THE RELAXED EDDY

ACCUMULATION TECHNIQUE. Jessica M. Valverde-Canossa, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemistry, Mainz,

Germany; and G. Moortgat and G, Schuster

243 6.5 BUILDING AFFECTED DISPERSION: DEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL PERFORMANCE OF A NEW LAGRANGIAN

PARTICLE MODEL. Matthew C. Hort, Met Office, Bracknell, Berks., UK; and B. Devenish and D. Thomson

247 6.6 DISPERSION OF A PASSIVE TRACER IN A BUOYANCY- AND SHEAR-DRIVEN BOUNDARY LAYER. Alessandro

Dosio, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and J. Vila-Guerau

de Arellano, A. A. M. Holtslag, and P. J. H. Bulltjes

* Manuscript not available ix

Table of Contents

15 SYMPOSIUM ON BOUNDARY LAYERS AND TURBULENCE

PAGE

6.7 IN-PLUME CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATIONS AND SELFSIMILARITY. Hans E J0rgensen, Ris0 National

Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark; and T. Mikkelsen, M. Nielsen, S. Ott, and D. Wilson

251 6.8 APPLICATION OF A LAGRANGIAN MODEL FOR POLLEN DISPERSION. Raymond W. Arritt, Iowa State Univ.,

Ames, IA; and J. M. Riese, M. E. Westgate, E. S. Takle, and M. J. Falk

POSTER SESSION P3: FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES

255 P3.1 OBSERVATIONS OF THE HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE OF THE BOUNDARY LAYER WITH THE TURBULENT EDDY

PROFILER. Paco Lopez Dekker, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA; and S. J. Frasier

259 P3.2 SENSITIVITY OF WIND AND TEMPERATURE RETRIEVALS FROM 4DVAR TO PRESCRIBED EDDY VISCOSITY

PROFILES, Rob K. Newsom, CIRA/Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO; and R. M. Banta

263 P3.3 TDMM ANALYSIS OF A TURBULENT DENSITY CURRENT. George Trevlflo, CHIRES, Inc. San Antonio, TX; and

E. L Andreas

267 P3.4 MODELLING AN EDDY DIFFUSIVITY FOR CONVECTIVE DECAYING TURBULENCE IN THE RESIDUAL LAYER.

Antonio Goulart, Universidade Regional Integrada, Santo Angelo, RS, Brazil; and G. Degrazia, D. Anfossi, and 0.

C. Acevedo

P3.5 THE ENERGY BUDGET OF DECAYING TURBULENCE AS MODELED BY DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF

TURBULENCE. James C Barnard, PNNL, Richland, WA; and W. J, Shaw

P3.6 USING CFD-PROGRAM FOR UNDERSTANDING OF THE ABL. Mikael Magnusson, SMHI, Norrkfiping, Sweden

269 P3.7 VELOCITY, TEMPERATURE AND SCALAR LENGTH SCALES IN THE CBL: OBSERVATIONS AND THEORY. Han

van Dop, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, the Netherlands; and A. van Herwijnen, D, van As, and M. F. Hibberd

273 P3.8 TURBULENCE IN A SHEAR-DRIVEN NOCTURNAL SURFACE LAYER DURING THE CASES'99 EXPERIMENT.

Philippe Droblnski, Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France; and R. K. Newsom, R. M. Banta, P. Carlottl, R. C.

Foster, P. Naveau, and J.-L. Redelsperger

277 P3.9 MEASURING THE VISCOUS DISSIPATION OF TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY WITH A HOTWIRE AND A SONIC

ANEMOMETER. Jan Slager, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, the Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke and A. van Dijk

281 P3.10 DYNAMIC EVALUATION OF DRAG COEFFICIENTS FOR FLOW OVER SCALE-SIMILAR COMPLEX BOUNDARIES.

Stuart Chester, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD; and C. Meneveau and M. Parlange

283 P3.11 ESTIMATION OF THE INTEGRAL TIME SCALE WITH TIME SERIES MODELS. Stijn de Waele, Delft Univ. of

Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; and A. van Dijk, P. Broersen, and P. G. Duynkerke

287 P3.12 ESTIMATION OF THE STATISTICAL ERROR IN LARGE EDDY SIMULATION RESULTS. Arnold F. Moene,

Meteorlogy and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and B. I. Michels

289 P3.13 A LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION MODEL PERFORMING ON MASSIVELY PARALLEL COMPUTERS. SiegfriedRaasch, Univ. of Hannover, Hannover, Germany; and M. Schroeter

293 P3.14 EVALUATION OF THE LAGRANGIAN FOOTPRINT MODEL LPDM-B USING WIND-TUNNEL DATA SETS.

Natascha Kljun, ETH, Zuerich, Switzerland; and P. Kastner-Klein, M. W. Rotach, and E. Fedorovich

295 P3.15 GENERATION OF LARGE-SCALE SEMI-ORGANIZED STRUCTURES IN TURBULENT CONVECTION. Tov Elperln,Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; and N. Kleeorin, I. Rogachevskli, and S. Zllltinkevich

299 P3.16 LES ANALYSIS ON WIND PROFILE OVER COMPLEX ROUGHENED GROUND SURFACE IN URBAN AREA.Tetsuro Tamura, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan; and 0. Ohno, S. Cao, Y. Okuda, and H.

Okada

* Manuscript not available x

Table of Contents

303 P4.1

307 P4.2

311 P4.3

313 P4.4


page

301 p3.17 examination of neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layers with the help of large

EDDY SIMULATION. Igor N. Esau, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden

POSTER SESSION P4: STABLE BLS; CHEMISTRY AND DISPERSION IN THE ABL

ON PARAMETERIZATION OF TURBULENCE DIFFUSION IN STRATIFIED ATMOSPHERE. Feng Liu, BTU Cobus,

Cottbus, Germany and Ocean Univ. of Qingdao, Qingdao, Shandong, China; and F. Huang

LABORATORY AND NUMERICAL STUDIES OF VERY STABLE BOUNDARY LAYERS. Yuji Ohya, Kyushu Univ.,Kasuga, Japan; and T. Uchida

LOCAL MIXING WITH EXTERNAL CONTROL IN THE MET OFFICE UNIFIED MODEL STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER.

Alastair G. Williams, Met Office, Bracknell, Berks., UK

ONE-COLUMN SIMULATIONS OF THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER OBSERVED DURING SABLES 98.

IMPORTANCE OF THE SURFACE FLUXES AND THE DYNAMIC FORCINGS. Laura Conangla, Universitat

Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; and J. Cuxartand E. Terradellas

315 P4.5 TURBULENCE STRUCTURE AND SIMILARITY THEORY OVER COMPLEX TERRAIN IN STABLE CONDITIONS.

Roberto Magnago, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; and R. da Silva, 0. C.

Acevedo, and 0. L. L. Moraes

OBSERVATIONS OF FLOW OVER COMPLEX TERRAIN WITHIN THE STABLE NOCTURNAL BOUNDARY LAYER.

Justin T. Walters, Univ, of Alabama, Huntsville, AL; and K. R. Knupp

THE INFLUENCE OF NOCTURNAL BOUNDARY LAYERS REGIMES ON THE SURFACE ENERGY BUDGET. Maria

Rosa Soler, Univ. of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and E. Ferreres and L. Mahrt

PAPER WITHDRAWN

FORMATION, EVOLUTION AND DECAY OF A SHEAR FLOW INSTABILITY IN THE STABLE NOCTURNAL

BOUNDARY LAYER. Rob K. Newsom, CIRA/Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO; and R. M. Banta and Y.

Pichugina

SOUND PROPAGATION OBSERVATIONS DURING THE CASES-99 EXPERIMENT. D. Keith Wilson, U.S. Army

Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD; and J. M. Noble and M. A. Coleman

LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS OF STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER: EXPLORATION OF RANGES OF APPLICABILITY.

Maria A. Jimenez, Institute Nacional de Meteorologia, Madrid, Spain; and J. Cuxart

MESOSCALE MODELING OF THE WINTERTIME BOUNDARY LAYER STRUCTURE OVER THE ARCTIC PACK ICE.

P. Ola G. Persson, CIRES/NOAA/ETL, Boulder, CO; and J.-W. Bao and S. Michaelson

OBSERVATIONS AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF AN ORDINARY KATABATIC WIND REGIME IN COATS

LAND, ANTARCTICA. Ian A. Renfrew, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK; and P. S. Anderson

TURBULENT DIFFUSION OF SCALARS IN STRATOCUMULUS TOPPED BOUNDARY LAYERS. Ian Faloona,

NCAR, Boulder, CO; and D. Lenschow and B. Stevens

A COUPLED MODEL OF SHELTER EFFECTS ON POLLEN DISPERSION. Raymond W. Arritt, Iowa State Univ.,

Ames, IA; and J. M. Riese, E. S. Takle, and M. J. Falk

A STUDY OF THE DISPERSION OF AN ELEVATED PLUME ON COMPLEX TERRAIN UNDER SUMMER

CONDITIONS. Gorka PSrez-Landa, Mediterranean Centre for Environmental Studies Foundation, Valencia,

Spain; and J. L. Palau, E. Mantilla, and M. M. Millan

350 P4.17 A VERSATILE ENTRAINMENT FUNCTION FOR DENSE-GAS DISPERSION. Morten Nielsen, Rise National

Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark; and N. 0. Jensen

318 P4.6

322 P4.7

P4.8

325 P4.9

329 P4.10

333 P4.11

335 P4.12

339 P4.13

343 P4.14

* P4.15

346 P4.16

*

Manuscript not available xi

Tabu of Contents

15 symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

EME

354 P4.18 CONCENTRATION CORRELATION TRANSFER OF URBAN AIR POLLUTION. Sukaran Ram Patel, Universidade

Federal da Parafba, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil

P4.19 THE NEW MODEL FOR AEROSOLS TRANSPORTATION IN BOUNDARY LAYER WITH OBSTACLES. Arakel

Petrosyan, Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; and K. Karelsky

356 P4.20 EVALUATION OF THE MICROMETEOROLOGY IN A SINGLE COLUMN CHEMISTRY AND METEOROLOGICAL

MODEL BEING CONSTRAINED WITH THE ECMWF ANALYZED METEOROLOGY. Laurens Ganzeveld, Max-

Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany; and J. Valverde-Canossa and G. Moortgat

360 P4.21 REAL-TIME PROFILES OF ORGANIC TRACE GASES IN THE ARCTIC BOUNDARY LAYER OBTAINED DURING

THE ARCTIC OCEAN EXPEDITION (AOE-2001). Michael L Jensen, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and

A. Wisthaler, A. Hansel, P. 0. G. Persson, and B. Templeman

P4.22 SEASONAL VARIATION OF BOUNDARY LAYER PROFILES OF C02 CONCENTRATIONS AND THE RECTIFIER

EFFECT AS MEASURED BY LIGHT AND ULTRALIGHT AIRCRAFT. Michael L Jensen, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado,Boulder, CO; and M. Hurwltz, K. Schulz, K. J. Davis, B. B. Balsley, and J. Blrks

362 P4.23 THE IMPACT OF FORECAST ERRORS IN BOUNDARY LAYER WIND AND FIELDS ON PREDICTIONS OF

SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATIONS. Sharon Zhong, PNNL, Richland, WA; and G. Jiang, E. Yang, and S.

Tanrikulu

364 P4.24 LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF DIFFUSION FROM/TO LINE AND POINT SOURCES/SINKS INSIDE A FOREST.

Hong-Bing Su, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN

SESSION 7: FIELD PROGRAMS AND OBSERVATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

366 7.1 THE BOUNDARY-LAYER PROGRAM DURING THE ARCTIC OCEAN 2001 EXPERIMENT. Michael TJernstrSrn,Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Sweden; and M. L. Jensen, S. Oncley, P. 0. G. Persson, and A. Targlno

370 7.2 THE STRUCTURE OF THE ARCTIC BOUNDARY-LAYER DURING THE ARTIC OCEAN 2001 EXPEDITION. Admir

Targino, Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Sweden; and M. TjernstrSm

374 7.3 STABLE BOUNDARY-LAYER REGIMES OBSERVED DURING THE SHEBA EXPERIMENT. Andrey A. Grachev,CIRES/Univ. of Colorado and NOAA/ETL, Boulder, CO; and C, W. Fairall, P. 0. G. Persson, E. L Andreas, and P.S. Guest

7.4 AN ANALYSIS OF BULK PARAMETERIZATIONS OF STABLY-STRATIFIED ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYERSUSING LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS. Branko Kosovic, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and J. A. Curry

7.5 A NEW SYSTEM FOR AIRBORNE MEASUREMENTS OF HIGH-RESOLUTION 3D WINDS USING A TETHERED

LIFTING SYSTEM (TLS). Michael L Jensen, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and M. TjemstrSm and A.Targlno

378 7.6 AIRBORNE MEASUREMENTS OF TURBULENT FLUXES OVER HETEROGENEOUS TERRAIN WITH HELIPOD

AND DO 128—ERROR ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON WITH GROUND-BASED SYSTEMS. Jens Bange,Aerospace Systems at Technical Univ. of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany; and F. Beyrich and D. A. M.Engelbart

382 7.7 PERFORMANCE OF S-BAND FMCW RADAR FOR BOUNDARY LAYER OBSERVATION. Stephen J. Frasier, Univ.of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA; and T. Ince and F. J. Lopez-Dekker

386 7.8 BOUNDARY LAYER MEASUREMENTS WITH A 3GHZ FMCW ATMOSPHERIC PROFILER. S. H. Heljnen, DelftUniv. of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; and H. Klein-Baltink, H. W. J. Russchenberg, H. Verlinde, and W. F.van der Zwan

* Manuscript not available xii

TABLE OF CONTENTS


page

SESSION 8: FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES OF THE ABL

390 8.1 THE SHAPES OF THE PRODUCTION REGIONS OF VELOCITY SPECTRA AND COSPECTRA IN THE NEUTRAL

ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE LAYER. K. G. McNaughton, Univ. of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland

394 8.2 QUASI-WAVELET MODELS FOR ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE. George H. Goedecke, New Mexico State Univ.,Las Cruces, NM; and D. K. Wilson, V. E. Ostashev, and H. J. Auvermann

398 8.3 SCALES OF TURBULENCE DECAY FROM OBSERVATIONS AND DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION. William J.

Shaw, PNNL, Richland, WA; and J. C. Barnard

8.4 A COMPARISON OF ECMWF RE-ANALYSIS DATA WITH OBSERVATIONS FROM CABAUW. Fred C. Bosveld,KNMI, De Bilt, the Netherlands; and H. Klein Baltink and A. Beljaars

402 8.5 SCALE DEPENDENCE AND SUBGRID-SCALE MODELING IN LES. Fernando PortS-Agel, Univ. of Minnesota,Minneapolis, MN; and J. R. Stoll, M. Carper, N. Bjelogrlic, and A. Fagerness

406 8.6 THE EFFECT OF EIGENVECTOR ALIGNMENTS ON SUBGRID-SCALE DISSIPATION OF TURBULENT KINETIC

ENERGY. Chad Higgins, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD; and C. Meneveau and M. Parlange

410 8.7 A MODELLING STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF CANOPY GAPS ON WIND AND SCALAR FLUX OBSERVATIONS.

Otdvio C. Acevedo, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; and D. R. Fitzjarrald

414 8.8 THE ROLE OF UNDERSTORY FLOWS IN FOREST CARBON BUDGETS. Rail M. Staebler, SUNY, Albany, NY; and

D. R. Fitzjarrald, M. J. Czikowsky, and R. K. Sakai

SESSION 9: FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES OF TURBULENCE, INCLUDING ADVANCES IN LES AND DNS, LABORATORY

STUDIES, AND OBSERVATIONS

418 9.1 EVIDENCE FROM THE ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE LAYER THAT THE VON KARMAN CONSTANT ISN'T. Edgar L

Andreas, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH; and K. J. Claffey, C. W.

Fairall, P. S. Guest, R. E. Jordan, and P. 0. G. Persson

422 9.2 ON REASONS FOR THE OBSERVED VARIATION OF THE VON KARMAN CONSTANT IN THE ATMOSPHERIC

SURFACE LAYER. Christoph A. Vogel, NOAA/ARL/ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN; and P. Frenzen

424 9.3 DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF INTERMITTENT TURBULENCE IN THE VERY STABLE EKMAN LAYER.

James C. Barnard, PNNL, Richland, WA; and J. J. Riley

428 9.4 FIRST ATTEMPTS OF AN LES-MODEL EVALUATION BY COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA GAINED

FROM ACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY. Sonja Weinbrecht, Univ. of Hannover, Hannover, Germany; and S. Raasch

432 9.5 MODELING UNRESOLVED MOTIONS IN LES OF FIELD-SCALE FLOWS. Fotini Katopodes Chow, Stanford Univ.,Stanford, CA; and R. L. Street

436 9.6 FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF SPATIALLY-FILTERED TURBULENCE IN THE ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE LAYER.

Thomas W. Horst, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and J. Kleissl, D. H. Lenschow, C. Meneveau, C.-H. Moeng, M. P.

Parlange, P. P. Sullivan, and J. C. Weil

440 9.7 ANALYSIS OF SUBFILTER-SCALE FLUXES IN THE ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE LAYER. Peter P. Sullivan, NCAR,

Boulder, CO; and T. W. Horst, D. H. Lenschow, C.-H. Moeng, and J. C. Weil

444 9.8 TURBULENT PRESSURE STATISTICS. Natasha L. Miles, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and J. C.

Wyngaard and M. J. Otte

448 9.9 LES STUDY ON THE ENERGY IMBALANCE PROBLEM WITH EDDY COVARIANCE FLUXES FOR UNIFORMLY

HEATED CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS. Manabu Kanda, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan; and

M. 0. Letzel, T. Watanabe, A. Inagaki, and S. Raasch

* Manuscript not available xiii

tabu of Contents


page

452 9.10 A MODEL FOR THE LARGE-SCALE RAMP STRUCTURES OBSERVED IN THE ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE LAYER.

K. G. McNaughton, Univ. of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland; and R. E. Blundell

456 9.11 AIRCRAFT MEASUREMENTS OF REFRACTIVE AND CLEAR AIR TURBULENCE: SPECTRA, BUDGETS, AND THE

PREDICTION PROBLEM. Owen R. Cote, Air Force Research Laboratory, Hanscom AFB, MA; and R. J, Dobosy,

J. Roadcap, T. L. Crawford, and J. M. Hacker

461 9.12 PRELIMINARY CASES-99 MEASUREMENTS OF STEEP VERTICAL GRADIENTS IN TEMPERATURE AND

TURBULENCE STRUCTURE USING A TETHERED LIFTING SYSTEM (TLS). Ben B. Balsley, CIRES/Univ. of

Colorado, Boulder, CO; and R. G. Frehlich, Y. Meillier, and M. L. Jensen

465 9.13 THE PRESSURE-CORRELATION TERM IN THE TKE BUDGET ESTIMATED BY THE WAVELET TRANSFORM

USING CASES-99 DATA. Joan Cuxart, Universitat de les llles Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; and G.

Morales, E. Terradellas, and C. Yague

467 9.14 EFFECTS OF STABILITY AND FILTER SIZE ON MODEL COEFFICIENTS AND INTERMITTENCY OF SUB-FILTER

FLUXES IN THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Jan Kleissl, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD; and C.

Meneveau and M. B. Parlange

SESSION 10: STABLE BLS—I

469 10.1 INVESTIGATION OF EPISODIC ENHANCEMENT OF TURBULENCE IN THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER USING

LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION. Richard T. Cederwall, LLNL, Livermore, CA; and R. L. Street

473 10.2 ON THE PREDICTABILTY OF THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER AND THE ROLE OF INITIAL CONDITIONS.

Richard T. McNider, Univ. of Alabama, Huntsville, AL; and X. Shi, D. E. England, M. J. Friedman, and W. B.

Norris

477 10.3 INTERMITTENT TURBULENCE AND OSCILLATIONS IN THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER: A SYSTEM

DYNAMICS APPROACH. B. J. H. Van de Wiel, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and A. F.

Moene, 0. K. Hartogensis, R. J. Ronda, H. A. R. de Bruin, and A. A. M. Holtslag

481 10.4 SHALLOW SLOPE DENSITY CURRENTS DURING CASES-99: OBSERVATIONS AND MODELING. Gregory S.

Poulos, Colorado Research Associates, Boulder, CO; and J. K. Lundquist, W. Blumen, and S. Neuville

10.5 INVESTIGATIONS OF STABLE BOUNDARY LAYERS AT SABLES AND B0RRIS95. Jakob Mann, Risa National

Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark; and H. E. J0rgensen, S. Larsen, and J. Cuxart

485 10.6 LIDAR OBSERVATIONS OF ENTRAINMENT ZONE STRUCTURE AT THE TOP OF THE STABLE MARINE

ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Ian M. Brooks, SlO/Univ. of California, La Jolla, CA

SESSION 11: STABLE BLS—-II

489 11.1 CONTRASTING VERTICAL STRUCTURES OF THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER. Larry Mahrt, Oregon State

Univ., Corvallis, OR; and D. Vickers

493 11.2 HEAT BALANCE IN NOCTURNAL BOUNDARY LAYERS. Jielun Sun, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and S. P. Burns, A. C.

Delany, S. P. Oncley, T. W. Horst, and D. H. Lenschow

497 11.3 ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR BOUNDARY-LAYER ATMOSPHERIC GRAVITY WAVES. Carmen J. Nappo,NOAA/ARL/ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN; and R. K. Newsom and R. M. Banta

501 11.4 FRONTAL GENERATION OF WAVES IN THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER: CASES-99 OBSERVATIONS. Julie K.Lundquist, PAOS, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO

503 11.5 NOCTURNAL LLJ EVOLUTION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO TURBULENCE AND FLUXES. Robert M. Banta,NOAA/ETL, Boulder, CO; and R. K. Newsom, Y. L. Pichugina, and J. K. Lundquist

*

Manuscript not available XIV

£M£

Table of Contents


11.6 SOME PROPERTIES OF INTERMITTENT TURBULENCE. J. Christopher Doran, PNNL, Richland, WA

508 11.7 THE BLOBS AND OTHER ADVECTIVE HORRORS OF NORTHERN WISCONSIN. Kenneth J. Davis, Penn State

Univ., University Park, PA; and P. S. Bakwin, B. D. Cook, M. D. Hurwitz, D. M. Ricciuto, W. Wang, and C. Yi

11.8 TOWARD LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS OF STRONGLY-STRATIFIED ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYERS.

Branko Kosovic, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and G. Poulos

SESSION 12: COUPLED SURFACE-BL STUDIES

512 12.1 SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY OF THE SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE SURFACE FLUX

DENSITIES AND THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Reinder J. Ronda, Meteorology and Air QualityGroup, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and B. J. J. M. van den Hurk and A. A. M. Holtslag

516 12.2 IMPACT OF SOIL MOISTURE ON BOUNDARY-LAYER CLOUD DEVELOPMENT. Michael Ek,NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC, Suitland, MD; and A. A. M. Holtslag

520 12.3 MODELING THE LOCAL CLIMATOLOGY OF MIXING LAYER HEIGHTS OVER TWO MIDLATITUDE HARDWOOD

FORESTS. Hong-Bing Su, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN; and C. S. B. Grimmond

524 12.4 COMPARISON OF OBSERVED AND MODELED SURFACE FLUXES OF HEAT FOR THE VOLTA RIVER BASIN. Dirk

Burose, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and A. F. Moene

and A. A. M. Holtslag

12.5 MASS TRANSPORT IN SNOW SALTATION. Judith J. J. Doorschot, Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and

Avalanche Research, Davos Dorf, Switzerland; and M. Lehning

528 12.6 INTEGRATING SURFACE AND BOUNDARY LAYER OBSERVATIONS OF C02 EXCHANGE IN HETEROGENEOUS

LANDSCAPES: EXPERIENCES FROM THE RECAB CAMPAIGN IN THE THE NETHERLANDS. Ronald W. A.

Hutjes, Alterra Green World Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands; and B. Gioli, M. Schumacher, H. ter Maat,H. Dolman, F. C. Bosveld, A. Vermeulen, and J. Vila

532 12.7 APPLICATION OF SURFACE LAYER SIMILARITY THEORY TO CARBON DIOXIDE, MOISTURE AND

TEMPERATURE. J. Vila-Guerau de Arellano, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ.,

Wageningen, the Netherlands; and 0. K. Hartogensis, A. T. Vermeulen, F. C. Bosveld, W. Kohsiek, and A. A. M.

Holtslag

535 12.8 APPLYING LAGRANGIAN DISPERSION ANALYSIS TO THE EXCHANGE OF WATER AND SENSIBLE HEAT

WITHIN A CEREALE CROP CANOPY: A SENSITIVITY STUDY AND COMPARISON WITH LEAF LEVEL

MEASUREMENTS. Eric Simon, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany; and 0 Ammann, J. Busch,

F. X. Meixner, and J. Kesselmeier

POSTER SESSION P5: ABL PARAMETERIZATIONS; MARINE BLS

539 P5.1 OBSERVATION OF ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER AND TURBULENCE ACTIVITY OVER THE OCEAN

SURFACE USING SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR. Pablo Clemente-Colon, NOAA/NESDIS, Camp Springs, MD


P5.3 SINGLE COLUMN MODEL EVALUATIONS OF LOWER-ORDER PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER

PARAMETERIZATIONS IN THE ARCTIC. Jeffrey D. Mirocha, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and J. A. Curry

543 P5.4 TURBULENCE PARAMETERIZATIONS AND SCALE DEPENDENCE OF TURBULENT STATISTICS. Michelle K.

Whisenhant, NPS, Monterey, CA; and Q. Wang, S. Wang, and J. D. Doyle

547 P5.5 SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO LOUIS SURFACE FLUX PARAMETERIZATION, Shouping Wang, NRL, Monterey,

CA; and Q. Wang and J. D. Doyle

*

Manuscript not available XV

Table of Contents

15Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

EMI

P5.6 THE EFFECT OF SEA STATE ON THE MOMENTUM EXCHANGE OVER THE SEA DURING NEUTRAL

CONDITIONS. Xiaoli Guo Larsen, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden; and U. H6gstr6m and A.-S. Smedman

P5.7 TRANSITION FROM UNSTABLE TO STABLE PBL IN THE COASTAL REGION OBSERVED BY SAR. Ralph C.

Foster, APL/ Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA; and D. C. Vandemark, H. L. Stern, L. Mahrt, and P. D. Mourad

551 P5.8 INTERCOMPARISON OF THREE SEA SURFACE ROUGHNESS SCHEMES USING BUOY DATA. Qing Wang, NPS,

Monterey, CA; and Z. Gao and S. Wang

555 P5.9 MODELLING THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER IN A CLIMATE MODEL OF INTERMEDIATE COMPLEXITY.

Reinder J. Ronda, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, the Netherlands; and R.

J. Haarsma and A. A. M. Holtslag

558 P5.10 IMPROVEMENT OF THE K-PROFILE MODEL FOR THE PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER BASED ON URGE

EDDY SIMULATION DATA. Woo-Geun Cheon, Yonsel Univ., Seoul, Korea; and Y, Noh, S.-y. Hong, and S.

Raasch

P5.11 AN ANALYTIC MODEL OF THE INFLUENCE OF WATER CHEMISTRY ON THE AIR-SEA EXCHANGE COEFFICIENT

OF COr Hans E. Jargensen, Rlsa National Laboratory, Roskllde, Denmark; and S. Larsen, A. Borges, and M.

Frankignoulle

560 P5.12 AN EVALUATION OF BOUNDARY LAYER AND LAND SURFACE PARAMETERIZATIONS USING DATA FROM THE

VTMX FIELD CAMPAIGN IN THE SALT LAKE CITY VALLEY. Shlyuan Zhong, PNNL, Richland, WA; and J. D. Fast

564 P5.13 CLEAR-AIR TURBULENCE PARAMETERISATION FOR LONG-RANGE APPLICATIONS OF A LAGRANGIAN

PARTICLE MODEL. Petra Seibert, Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna, Austria; and A. Frank

P5.14 DISSIPATION PARAMETRIZATION IN KINETIC ENERGY EQUATION. Valery N. Khokhlov, Odessa State

Ecological Univ., Odessa, Ukraine

P5.15 DOES THE HEIGHT OF THE BOUNDARY LAYER INFLUENCE THE TURBULENCE STRUCTURE NEAR THE

SURFACE OVER THE BALTIC SEA? Cecilia Johansson, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden; and A.-S. Smedman

P5.16 HEIGHT VARIATION OF TURBULENT PARAMETERS IN THE MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER DUE

TO WAVE INFLUENCE. Anna Sjdblom, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden; and A.-S. Smedman

POSTER SESSION P6: BLS OVER HETEROGENEOUS SURFACES; COUPLED SURFACE—BL STUDIES

566 P6.1 INFLUENCE OF A SMALL-SCALE TOPOGRAPHY ON THE DYNAMICS OF ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER

FLOWS USING GRID-NESTING APPROACH. Thibauld PSnelon, CNRS, Nantes, France; and I. Calmet and P. G.

Mestayer

568 P6.2 SURFACE BOUNDARY LAYER EXCHANGE OF NITRIC OXIDE, NITROGEN DIOXIDE, AND OZONE OVER ABRAZILIAN PASTURE. Grant A. Kirkman, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany; and C. Ammannand F. X. Meixner

572 P6.3 SURFACE WIND HETEROGENEITY FOR CASES-99. Sam S. Chang, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD;and D. M. Garvey, G. Huynh, and C. C. Williamson

576 P6.4 TAKING A CLOSER LOOK AT THE TURBULENCE IN A HIGHER-ORDER CLOSURE MESOSCALE MODEL Stefan

Soderberg, Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Sweden; and M, TjernstrOm and I. M. Brooks

580 P6.5 USING THE INVERSE METHOD TO OBTAIN AREA AVERAGED TURBULENT FLUXES FROM AIRBORNEMEASUREMENTS AT ONE LOW ALTITUDE. Peter Zittel, Aerospace Systems, Braunschweig, Germany; and W.

Deierling and J. Bange

Manuscript not available xvi

Table of Contents


page

P6.6 THE TURBULENT CHARACTERISTICS IN THE SURFACE LAYER OVER MOVABLE DUNE AND CORNFIELD AT

NAIMAN IN INNER MONGOLIA. Liu Huizhi, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing, China

582 P6.7 TURBULENT FORM DRAG ON ANISOTROPIC THREE-DIMENSIONAL OROGRAPHY. Andrew R. Brown, Met

Office, Bracknell, Berks., UK; and N. Wood and M. Athanassiadou

586 P6.8 TURBULENT TRANSFER EFFICIENCY OF MOMENTUM, HEAT, VAPOR, AND C02 MEASURED IN THE URBANSURFACE LAYER OVER A DENSELY BUILT-UP CANOPY. Ryo Moriwaki, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo,Japan; and M. Kanda and T. Watanabe

588 P6.9 SURFACES TEMPERATURE AND TURBULENT PROPERTIES OF HEAT TRANSFER WITHIN THE URBAN

ROUGHNESS SUB-LAYER. Shlomi Pistinner, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Nes-Ziona, Israel; and E.

Fattal and E. Gavze

592 P6.10 TURBULENCE OBSERVATIONS AT THE EDGE OF A CLIFF. Otavio C. Acevedo, Universidade Federal de Santa

Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; and 0. L. L. Moraes and R. da Silva

596 P6.11 SPECTRAL TRANSFER OF TEMPERATURE CORRELATION FOR INHOMOGENEOUS TURBULENCE. Sukaran

Ram Patel, Universidade Federal da Parafba, Campina Grande, Brazil


598 P6.13 A NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF IMPACT OF T-HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE ON THE GREAT LAKES AND

ST. LAWRENCE ECOSYSTEM. Sreerama M. Daggupaty, MSC, Downsview, ON, Canada; and J. Ma

602 P6.14 CHARACTERIZING TURBULENT TRACE GAS EXCHANGE ABOVE A DENSE TROPICAL RAIN FOREST USING

WAVELET AND SURFACE RENEWAL ANALYSIS. Udo Rummel, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz,Germany; and C. Ammann and F. X. Meixner

606 P6.15 COASTAL SMALL-SCALE VARIABILITY OF THE SURFACE TURBULENT MOMENTUM FLUX. Mark Zagar,Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Sweden; and G. Svensson and M. Tjernstrom

610 P6.16 DAYTIME BOUNDARY LAYER HEIGHTS OVER THE ALPS. AN OBSERVATIONAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY.

Stephan F. J. De Wekker, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and D. G. Steyn and S. Nyeki

P6.17 DISPERSIVE VS. LOCAL TURBULENCE STATISTICS WITHIN THE URBAN ROUGHNESS SUBLAYER. Ehud

Gavze, IIBR, Nes-Ziona, Israel; and E. Fattal and S. Pistinner

614 P6.18 INTERACTION BETWEEN WIND AND TEMPERATURE FIELDS UNDER THE HETEROGENEOUS HEAT FLUX IN

THE PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER. Hyoung-Jin Kim, Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea; and Y. Noh and S. Raasch

616 P6.19 INTERNAL BOUNDARY LAYER AND EVAPORATION FROM LAKES. Sergiy A. Savelyev, York Univ., Toronto, ON,

Canada; and P. A. Taylor

620 P6.20 ON MODELLING THE 1-D ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Wensong Weng, York Univ., Toronto, ON,

Canada; and P. A. Taylor

SESSION 13: ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER PARAMETERIZATIONS FROM MESOSCALE TO MACROSCALE

622 13.1 BAROCLINIC EKMAN LAYER. Sergej S. Zilitinkevich, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden; and I. N. Esau

624 13.2 A SIMPLE AND GENERAL SUBGRID MODEL SUITABLE BOTH FOR SURFACE LAYER AND FREE-STREAM

TURBULENCE. J.-L. Redelsperger, CNRM, Toulouse, France; and P. Carlottl and F. Mane"

13.3 PAPER WITHDRAWN

*

Manuscript not available xvii

Table of Contents

PAGE

628 13.4

* 13.5

632 13.6


AN INTEGRAL MIXING LENGTH SCALE FORMULATION FOR A TKE-L TURBULENCE CLOSURE IN

ATMOSPHERIC MODELS. Geert Lenderink, KNMI, de Bilt, the Netherlands

IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW PARAMETERIZATION APPROACH FOR CLOUD-TOPPED BOUNDARY LAYERS IN

MM5 AND CCM. Christopher S. Bretherton, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA; and J. R. McCaa and H. Grenier

EVALUATION OF MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER PARAMETERIZATIONS IN COAMPS USING THE JES

EXPERIMENT DATA SET. Konstantinos Rados, NPS, Monterey, CA; and Q. Wang, J. Kaloglros, S. Wang, D.

Khelif, and C. Friehe

636 13.7 EVALUATION OF MESOSCALE MODEL FORECASTS OF BOUNDARY LAYER PROPERTIES OVER THE PACIFIC

NORTHWEST. James R. McCaa, APL, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA; and R. C. Foster, S. A. Ferguson, and

C. F. Mass

638 13.8 OBSERVED AND SIMULATED TURBULENCE KINETIC ENERGY AND DISSIPATION PROFILES IN AN URBAN

VALLEY DURING VTMX 2000. Jerome D. Fast, PNNL, Richland, WA; and W. J. Shaw

SESSION 14: THE MARINE BL

642 14.1 SCALAR FLUX PROFILE RELATIONSHIPS FOR WATER VAPOR OVER THE OPEN OCEAN. James B. Edson,WHOI, Woods Hole, MA; and C. Zappa and W. R. McGillls

14.2 VELOCITY SPECTRA IN THE MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Ann-Sofi Smedman, Uppsala Univ.,Uppsala, Sweden; and A. Sjbblom

646 14.3 EDDY CORRELATION MEASUREMENTS OF WAVE-INDUCED STRESS USING INSTRUMENTS MOUNTED ON A

WAVE FOLLOWER. Cor M. J. Jacobs, KNMI, De Bllt, the Netherlands; and W. A. Oost, C. van Oort, and E.

Worrell

14.4 IMPACTS OF HIGH-RESOLUTION SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE DATA ON MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER

STRUCTURE SIMULATED BY THE NAVY'S COAMPS. Shouping Wang, NRL, Monterey, CA; and J. D. Doyle, Q.

Wang, and J. Cummings

14.5 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF CLOUDS GENERATED BY MID-WINTER ARCTIC LEADS AND THEIR EFFECT

ON LARGE-SCALE SURFACE FLUXES. Steven K. Krueger, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; and M. A. Zulauf

650 14.6 SEA-TO-AIR EXCHANGE OF DIMETHYLSULFIDE. Henk J. Zemmelink, Univ. of Groningen, Haren, the

Netherlands; and H. W. J. de Baar, J. W. H. Dacey, E. J. Hinsta, and W. R. McGillis

SESSION 15: BOUNDARY LAYERS OVER HETEROGENEOUS SURFACES

653 15.1 FLUXES OVER A HETEROGENEOUS LAND SURFACE: RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES OF THE UTFASS

PROGRAM. Frank Beyrich, German Meteorological Service, Lindenberg, Germany; and S. H. Rlchter, U.

Weisensee, H.-J. Herzog, H. A. R. de Bruin, and W. M. L. Meijninger

655 15.2 FLOW AND DRAG MECHANISMS RESULTING. FROM THE INTERACTION OF GRAVITY WAVES WITH ATURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER. Maria Athanassiadou, Met Office, Bracknell, Berks., UK; and A. R. Brown

659 15.3 DEPENDENCE OF REGIONAL MIXING-HEIGHT DIFFERENCES ON BOUNDARY-LAYER WIND SPEED. Robert M.

Banta, NOAA/ETL, Boulder, CO; and A. B. White and W. M. Angevine

660 15.4 LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY AND REGIONAL CLIMATIC VARIABILITY IN THE EAST CENTRAL AMAZONREGION. David R. Fitzjarrald, Univ. at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY; and 0. L. L. Moraes, R. K. Sakai, R. M.Staebler, 0. C. Acevedo, M. Czikowsky, and R. da Silva

662 15.5 TURBULENT AND RADIATIVE FLUX DIVERGENCES IN COLD POOLS THAT FORM WITHIN A HIGH-ELEVATIONBASIN. C. David Whiteman, PNNL, Richland, WA; and C. B. Clements and J. D, Horel

*

Manuscript not available xviii

PA6J

Table of Contents


666 15.6 LOCAL SCALING OF TURBULENCE IN THE STABLE INTERNAL BOUNDARY LAYER AROUND A COASTAL

HEADLAND. Stefan Soderberg, Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Sweden; and I. M. Brooks and M. Tjernstrom

670 15.7 LES OF THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER OVER HETEROGENEOUS SURFACES USING A DYNAMIC

LAGRANGIAN SGS MODEL. Elie Bou-Zeid, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD; and M. Parlange and C.

Meneveau

672 15.8 LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS OF THERMALLY INDUCED OSCILLATIONS IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY

LAYER. Marcus Oliver Letzel, Univ. of Hannover, Hannover, Germany; and S. Raasch

676 15.9 THE INFLUENCE OF LARGE-SCALE SOIL MOISTURE HETEROGENEITY ON WETTING AND DRYING

PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYERS. Edward G. Patten, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and P. P. Sullivan and C.-H. Moeng

680 15.10 USING FINE SCALE VEGETATION, SOIL AND SATELLITE MAPPING TO INVESTIGATE THE IMPACT OF

HETEROGENEOUS LAND SURFACES IN CSIRO CLIMATE MODELS. Peter J. Lawrence, Univ. of Queensland,

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

15.11 STATISTICAL PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BOUNDARIES IN THE ABL. Haldun Karan, Univ. of

Alabama, Huntsville, AL; and K. Knupp

684 15.12 TURBULENT PROPERTIES OF MOMENTUM TRANSFER WITHIN THE URBAN ROUGHNESS SUBLAYER. Ehud

Gavze, IIBR, Nes-Ziona, Israel; and E. Fattal and S. Pistinner

688 15.13 EFFECTS OF LAND-USE CHANGE ON LOCAL ENERGY, WATER AND CARBON BALANCES IN AN AMAZONIAN

PASTURE. Ricardo K. Sakai, SUNY, Albany, NY; and D. R. Fitzjarrald, 0. L. L. Moraes, 0. C. Acevedo, M.

Czikowsky, R. Silva, R. Staebler, K. E. Moore, and D. Spiess

*

Manuscript not available xix

15th symposium on · 2008. 7. 15. · p1.11 variation of the cloud-topped boundary layer height...

Documents