15698118 design of photo voltaic systems

Upload: donkinggg7666

Post on 29-May-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    1/55

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    2/55

    A Typical PV SystemIntroduction

    DC LOADPV ARRAY

    DIODE

    BATTERY

    FANS,

    LAMPS

    etc.

    AC LOAD

    I N V

    E

    R

    T

    E

    R

    GRID

    Power

    Conditioner

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    3/55

    Construction of PV Array1. PV Array consists of severalModules2. Single, polycrystalline oramorphous

    silicon3. Packing Factor

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    4/55

    Losses1. The transmission of the radiation is

    reduced because of reflection of the

    protective glass sheet on top andabsorption in it, and2. The packing factor. That is, the entire

    area of the module is not covered by

    the solar cells but there are large gapsbetween the adjacent solar cells.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    5/55

    Space Wasted by Round Solar

    CellsSuppose that the radius of the cells is r.

    Then the total area required to place fourcells is:At = (2r + 2r) X (2r+2r) = 4r X 4r = 16r2..(1)However, the area covered by the fourcells, the cell area, is:

    4X ( r2) = 4 r2. Therefore, the ratio of the cell area to thetotal area At, is:4 r2 /16r2 = /4 = 0.7854.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    6/55

    Connection of Array

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    S1

    R2 R4R3R1

    S3

    S2

    Figure 4. A typical array of solar modules with bypass diodes.

    T1

    T2

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    7/55

    Bypass DiodesIf a module in a string fails due to somereason, or comes under the shadow of someobject then the current in that module will

    reduce drastically and will limit the currentfrom the other two which pass through it. Inshort the current through a string willreduce. In such a case the bypass diodeassociated with that module will allow the

    current to pass through itself. For example if module D2 fails then S2 will bypass thecurrent generated by D1 and D3.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    8/55

    Hot Spot Formation1. Hot spots in a module.2. A module consists of a large number

    of solar cells connected in series. If one cell is shaded and the module iseither short circuited or connected to aheavy load then the current from theother cells will cause i2R heat to begenerated in it. The cell under shadowwill present a high resistance.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    9/55

    Hot Spots (continued)1. The other nine cells will approach open

    circuit voltage Voc

    2. This Voc will then be applied across theshaded cell and force a current in thereverse direction

    3. This will not only reverse bias the junction,

    which may cause a breakdown, but alsoforce the current through its combinedseries and shunt resistors, R = (Rs + Rsh)

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    10/55

    Hot Spot in Shaded Cell

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    11/55

    Equivalent Circuit of a

    Solar Cell

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    12/55

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    13/55

    The Maximum Power Point

    Tracker (MPPT)

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    14/55

    Converters and Algorithms1. Buck Converter based MPPT2. Boost Converter based MPPT

    Common Algorithms for Converters1. Perturb and Observe (P&O), and2. Incremental Conductance

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    15/55

    Block Diagram of MPPTMicrocontrollers and DSPs

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    16/55

    A Typical P & O Algorithm

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    17/55

    A 2.2kW MPPT Response

    Curve The response time of a buck basedMPPT with P&O algorithm

    V OC

    V MPP

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    18/55

    Battery charge/discharge

    controller

    R 1 6

    U 3 CL M 3 2 4

    1 0

    9

    4

    1 1

    8

    +

    -

    V +

    V -

    O U T

    R 1

    F 1

    R 2 9

    R 2 6

    1

    3

    2

    D 9

    R 1 3

    1 2

    R 2 7

    R 1 4

    R 1 1

    1

    3

    2

    R 62

    1

    3

    D 1 4

    L E DR 2 8

    R 1 5

    + C 1

    R 1 7

    R 4

    Q 1

    B C 1 0 7 A 32

    1

    R 2 3

    R 1 0

    D 5

    R 2 1

    U 1 A

    L M 3 2 4

    3

    2

    4

    1 1

    1

    +

    -

    V +

    V -

    O U T

    R 2 5

    U 4 DL M 3 2 4

    1 2

    1 3

    4

    1 1

    1 4

    +

    -

    V +

    V -

    O U T

    U 2 BL M 3 2 4

    5

    6

    4

    1 1

    7

    +

    -

    V +

    V -

    O U T

    R 1 2

    D 8

    C 3

    C 2

    C 7

    R 2 0

    R 1 8

    D 1 1

    L E D

    1

    2

    C 4

    D 1 2

    D 1 0

    R 9

    R 2

    D 1

    R 5

    D 3

    R 3

    D 1 5C 5

    R 3 0

    R 2 4

    D 4

    D 2

    D 1 3

    R 2 2

    R 1 9

    R 7

    R 8

    B a t t e r y L o w

    8K 21 %

    (1 N4 1 4 8 )

    1 N 5 8 2 2

    3 V3

    4K 7

    47 K

    1 N 5 8 2 2

    2K 2

    1 2K

    ( 8 K 2 )

    1 002 5V

    D 7 t o D 1 4M T P 2 9 5 5 E

    C h a rg e C o n t r o l l e r f o r C F L 5 W / 7 W b a s e dL a n t e r n

    N o t e :

    4 V7

    47 K

    1 0K

    5V

    0 .1

    4K 7

    1 K

    2K 2

    1M

    To L 2

    0 . 0 12 K7

    5 K63 9K1 %

    22 K2 K 2 )

    B+

    S W1 B

    R ED

    5 K6

    3 9K1 %

    10 K

    2K 2

    PV +

    8 * 1 N 4 1 4 8

    0 . 0 1

    2 7 0 K

    2 K7

    L M 3 8 5 - 2 . 5 V

    1 N 4 1 4 8

    8K 2B-

    22 K

    27 0

    PV -

    0 .1

    1 N

    4 1 4 8

    T O C T O FT R A N S F O R M E RB A S EW I N D I N G

    8K 21 %

    1 N 4 0 0 7

    S W1 A

    F l o a t C h a r g i n g = 1 4 . 5 VL o a d d i s c o n n . = 11 . 5 VL o a d R e - c o n n . = 1 2 V

    0 . 0 1

    1 N 5 8 2 2

    Te m p . C o m p . a t B + = 1 4 . 5 6 m V / C ( 1 6 . 1 3 m V / C )

    1 K8

    G r e e n

    1 8 K / 1 %

    1K 8

    3 V3

    1 8 K / 1 %

    ( C h a rg i n g )

    2 M2

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    19/55

    A Lead Acid Battery

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    20/55

    Chemical EquationsFor charging: the cell the positiveterminal of a DC voltage, higher thanthat of the cell, is applied to the anodewith the negative end attached to itscathode. The governing chemicalequations are:

    1. PbSO4 + 2H2O PbO2 + 4H+ +SO42- + 2e- At the anode, and

    2. PbSO4 + 2e- Pb + SO42-At the Cathode

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    21/55

    Discharging:

    The equations at the anodeand the cathode become:PbO 2 + 4H + + SO 42- + 2e - PbSO 4 +2H 2O

    And, Pb + SO 42- PbSO 4 + 2e -

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    22/55

    Charge Versus Rate of

    Discharge

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    23/55

    Life Cycles Versus

    Discharge

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    24/55

    Alone Photovoltaic Power

    Supply1. Average power output = 1 kW into a DC load at a

    DC voltage of 108 Volts2. Duration of operation = 24 hours/day

    3. Average time of sunlight available = 8 hours/day4. Number of sunless days = 2/week5. Peak value of insolation in Delhi = 900

    Watts/meters26. Maximum depth of discharge of battery = 50 %7. Array should have a fixed tilt of 28 Deg. For Delhi

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    25/55

    Block diagram of the 1 kWPV power supply

    For DC loads only

    DC LOADPV ARRAY

    DIODE

    BATTERY

    FANS,

    LAMPS

    etc.

    MPPT

    CHARGE/DISCHARGECONTROLLER

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    26/55

    Assumptions The following assumptions have been made: The electrical efficiency of the circuit of the MPPT= 90 %

    The charge/discharge cycle efficiency of thebattery (assuming new ones) = 90 %

    The diode is usually a built-in part of the MPPT andtherefore neglected. However it is necessary tosave the circuit from accidental input voltageinversion.Wiring and cabling will introduce another 5 % loss.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    27/55

    Calculations The energy requirement for 7 days will becalculated below.Power required = 1000 Watts

    Therefore, energy needed for 7 days = 1000W X 24 Hr X 7 days = 168,000 Watt hours.For an 8 hour sunlit day the energy given

    directly to the load is:1000 W X 8 Hr X 5 Days = 40,000 W Hr-------------------- A1Since sunlight is available for only 5 days.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    28/55

    Calculations (Continued)Hence, the rest of the energy must bestored in and supplied by the batterybank.

    This energy is:168,000 40,000 = 128,000 W Hr--------A2Again, the charge discharge efficiency

    of the battery bank is 90 %. Therefore,the energy supplied to the battery is:128,000/0.9 = 142,222 W Hr-------------------A3

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    29/55

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    30/55

    Battery Sizing (Continued)1. For 108 volts a string of 9 batteries, of 12

    volts each, must be used.

    2. The charge capacity of each battery must be:3. 2633.75 A - Hr/9 = 292.6 A Hr.-----------B34. In case 300 A - Hr batteries, which are rare,

    are not available then two strings of 9, 150 A

    Hr ones may be connected in parallel

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    31/55

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    32/55

    Diodes D1 , D2 ,D3 and D4

    1. At 108 volts the load current is:2. 1000 W/108 V = 9.26 Amperes -----B4

    3. Nominal voltage, during conduction,across them is 0.7 Volt.

    4. Therefore both the diode will dissipate9.26 A X 0.7 V = 6.8 Watts -----B5

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    33/55

    Dissipation in Diodes1. Each diode will conduct half the

    current of 9.26 Amperes, that is, 4.63

    Amperes2. Each diode, with 100 % overrating,should be 10 amperes, 200 volts

    3. Energy Consumed by Diodes:6.8 W X 24 hrs X 7 days = 1,142.4 W Hr -------------- B6

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    34/55

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    35/55

    Power loss in D3 & D4(Continued)1. The voltage drop across the diodes is 0.7

    Volts.

    2. Therefore the power dissipated in D3 andD4 is: 42 A X 0.7 V = 29.53 Watts3. Therefore energy consumed is:

    29.53 W X (8 Hours X 5 days) = 1181 W Hr --------------- B11

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    36/55

    Total Array Energy1. Thus the energy consumed by the four

    diodes is:1,142.4 W Hr + 1,181 W Hr = 2,323.4 W Hr ------------------ B12

    2. This must be supplied by the PV array. Therefore the total array energy rises to:

    40,000 W Hr +1, 42,222 W Hr + 2,323.4 W- Hr = 1, 84,545.4 Watt hours -----B13

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    37/55

    Total Array Energy(Contd.)

    1. This energy is given by the MPPTwhich itself has an efficiency of 90%. Hence the energy delivered atthe input of the MPPT from thearray is:

    1,84,545.4/0.9 = 2, 05,050.44Watt hours -------------- B14

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    38/55

    Energy given to MPPTInput

    1. As assumed earlier there is a 5 %loss in wiring and cabling, hence

    the output of the array should be:2, 05,050.44 + (5 X 2,05,050.44)/100 = 2, 05,050.44 +

    10,252.52 = 2, 15,302.96 W Hr----B15

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    39/55

    . Array Size

    This energy of 2, 15,302.96 W Hris to be generated by the array in 5days with 8 hours of sunlight oneach day. Hence the power of thearray becomes:

    2, 05,050.44 W Hr/ (8 hr X 5days) = 5126.25 Watts------------------ C1

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    40/55

    Daily Variation of Insolation

    Modules are Rated at 1000 W/m2

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    41/55

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    42/55

    Electrical Parameters PM150

    1. Maximum Power Rating Pmax. (Wp)* 150.02. Minimum Power Rating Pmin (Wp)* 180.03. Rated Current IMPP (A) 4.804. Rated Voltage VMPP (V) 34.05. Short Circuit Current Isc (A) 5.0

    6. Open Circuit Voltage Voc (V) 42.8

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    43/55

    Number of Modules1. Since these modules are calibrated at

    1000 W/m2 their MPP value will reduce at900 W/m2. The real MPP voltage will be

    then:34 X 9/10 = 30.6 Volts -------------------- C72. Therefore 3 modules in series will yield

    91.8 Volts and the total number of modulesrequired for the array:8977.67 Watts/150 Watts (Wp) = 59.85 =60 ----- C8

    3. Number of strings, with each stringscontaining 3 modules is 60/3 = 20

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    44/55

    Costing The cost of the components can be tabulated

    below:Solar module @ Rs. 200.00 per Watt = 8977.67Watts X 200 = Rs. 17,95,534.0018 batteries, 150 A Hr, 12 Volts each @ Rs.10,000.00 each = Rs. 1,80,000.00MPPT and Charge/Discharge controller

    = Rs. 50,000.00_

    Total = Rs.20,25,534.00

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    45/55

    ComparisionIf a life time of 10 years is taken for thearray and 5 years for the battery bankthen the cost amounts to: Rs. 22,05,534.00. In ten years the electricityproduced is equal to:1 X 24 hours X 365 days X 10 years =87,600 kW-Hr. ------------- D1

    Therefore the cost of this energy is:Rs. 22, 05,534/87,600 = Rs. 25.17 perkW Hr --------------D2

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    46/55

    Comparison (Continued)1. At present the cost of domestic

    electricity from the grid is Rs. 4.60 per

    kW Hr2. Cost of electricity from Diesel = Rs.

    12.50/unit3. If the life span of the PV array is taken

    to be 20 years, the PV generatedpower will compete with dieselgenerated power

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    47/55

    The Additional Benefits of PV Power

    1. Carbon credits, and2. Lack of emission of polluting

    gases.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    48/55

    Design of Solar Pump1. The pump horsepower

    HP = (4.19 X 10-6) (GPD)(h) ---------- E1(PT)(PTF)()

    GPD is the gallons per day to be

    pumped,PT is the pumping time,

    PTE is the pumping time factor,h is the effective height and is the wire-to-water efficiency of thepump-motor combination.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    49/55

    Horsepower in MKS Units

    In MKS, the horsepower is given byHP = (3.658 X 10-6) (LPD)(h) ----- E2

    (PT)(PTF)()Where now LPD is the pumpingrequirement in liters per day

    h is the effective pumping height inmeters.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    50/55

    Pumping Time Factor

    Use of an MPPT in the systemnormally increases the daily

    volume pumped by an additional20%. Hence, a reasonable defaultvalue for PTF when a MPPT is used

    is 1.2 if the pump is connecteddirectly to the PV array, then thePTF will be 1.0.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    51/55

    Pump Efficiency

    The wire-to-water efficiency, , willbe specified by the pump

    manufacturer. For fractionalhorsepower pumps, it is typicallyabout 25% while larger pumps will

    be more efficient.

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    52/55

    NumericalNumerical:Specification for pumping system:Volume of water to be lifted = 2000gallons/day.Water reservoir = 200 ft. undergroundWorst case peak Sun day = 6 hrs.PTF = 1Peak Sun = 6 hrs.Assume pump efficiency = 25%Piping friction losses = 5%

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    53/55

    Calculations Therefore effective height = 200X 1.05= 210 ft.

    Substituting in equation E1, pump HP =1.17. However, the service factor is 25%for a 1HP motor which means that a 1HP motor can operate at 1.25 HPwithout any damage to itself.1.17 HP = 1.17 X 746W = 872.82 W.Pump Operating DC Voltage = 96 V

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    54/55

  • 8/9/2019 15698118 Design of Photo Voltaic Systems

    55/55