15-ijaest-volume-no-2-issue-no-1-related-fixed-points-theorems-on-three-metric-spaces-(fpttms)-104-1
DESCRIPTION
)(X,d be a complete metric space, RR 0, () 0 tdt for all x, x Then RST has a unique fixed point u in X, TRS has a unique fixed point v in Y and STR has a unique fixed point w in Z. Further, Tu = v, Sv = w and Rw = u. In recently Ansari , Sharma[6] generate Related Fixed Points Theorems on Three Metric Spaces. Now We obtained related fixed point theorem on three metric spaces satisfying integral type inequality. I. I NTRODUCTION a fyfxd yxd mapping such that for each ),(TRANSCRIPT
Related Fixed Points Theorems on Three Metric Spaces ( FPTTMS)
Manish Kumar Mishra and Deo Brat Ojha
[email protected], [email protected]
Department of Mathematics
R.K.G.Institute of Technology
Ghaziabad,U.P.,INDIA
Abstract— We obtained related fixed point theorem on three metric
spaces satisfying integral type inequality.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 54H25
Keywords- Three metric space, fixed point, integral type inequality.
.
I. INTRODUCTION The following fixed point theorem was proved by Fisher [1].
Theorem 1.1: Let ( , )X d and ( , )Z be complete metric spaces.
If S is a continuous mapping of X into Z, and R is a
continuous mapping of Z into X satisfying the inequalities:
( , '), ( , ),( , ') max
( ' '), ( , ')
( , '), ( , ),( , ') max
( ' '), ( , ')
d x x d x RSxd RSx RSx c
d x RSx d Sx Sx
z z z SRzSRz SRz c
z SRz Rz Rz
for all x, x' in X, and z, z' in Z, where 0≤ c < 1, then RS has a
unique fixed point u in X and RS has a unique fixed point w in Z.
Further Su = w and Rw = u. The next theorem was proved in [2].
Theorem 1.2: Let ( , )X d , ( , )Y and ( , )Z be complete metric
spaces and suppose T is a continuous mapping of X into Y, S is a
continuous mapping of Y into Z and R is a continuous mapping of
Z into X satisfying the inequalities:
( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , ), ( , ), ( , )}( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , ), ( , ), ( , )}( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , ), ( , ), ( , )}
d RSTx RSy c d x RSy d x RSTx y Tx Sy STx
TRSy STz c y TRz x TRSy z Sy d Rz RSy
STRz STx c z STx z STRz d x Rz Tx TRz
for all x in X, y in Y and z in Z, where 0≤ c < 1. Then RST has a
unique fixed point u in X, TRS has a unique fixed point v in Y and
STR has a unique fixed point w in Z. Further Tu = v, Sv = w and
Rw = u. The next theorem was proved in [3].
Theorem 1.3 : Let ( , )X d , ( , )Y and ( , )Z be complete metric
spaces and suppose T is a continuous mapping of X into Y, S is a
continuous mapping of Y into Z and R is a continuous mapping of
Z into X satisfying the inequalities:
( , '), ( , ),( , ') max ( ', '), ( , '),
, '
( , '), ( , ),( , ') max ( ', '), ( , '),
, '
( , '), ( , ),( , ') max ( ', '
d x x d x RSTx
d RSTx RSTx c d x RSTx Tx Tx
STx STx
y y y TRSy
TRSy TRSy c y TRSy Sy Sy
d RSy RSy
z z z STRz
STRz STRz c z STRz
), , ' ,( , ')
d Rz Rz
TRz TRz
for all x, x
Then RST has a unique fixed point u in X, TRS has a unique fixed
point v in Y and STR has a unique fixed point w in Z. Further, Tu
= v, Sv = w and Rw = u. In recently Ansari , Sharma[6] generate
Related Fixed Points Theorems on Three Metric Spaces. Now We
obtained related fixed point theorem on three metric spaces
satisfying integral type inequality.
Let )(X,d be a complete metric space, [0,1], :f X X a
mapping such that for each x , y X ,
,)()(),(
0
),(
0
dttdtt
fyfxd yxd
Where RR ; is a
lebesgue integrable mapping which is summable, nonnegative and
such that, for each 0
0, ( ) 0t dt
. Then f has a unique
Manish Kumar Mishra et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES
Vol No. 2, Issue No. 1, 104 - 107
ISSN: 2230-7818 @ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved. Page 104
IJAEST
common fixed z X such that for each x X , .lim zxf n
n
Rhoades(2003)[4], extended this result by replacing the above
condition by the following
( , ) 1max{ ( , ), ( , ), ( , ), [ ( , ) ( , )]
20
0
( ) ( )d fx fy
d x y d x fx d y fy d x fy d y fx
t dt t dt
Ojha (2010) [5] Let ( , )X d be a metric space and let
: , : ( )f X X F X CB X be a single and a multi-
valued map respectively, suppose that f and F are occasionally
weakly commutative (OWC) and satisfy the inequality
1
1
1
1
max
0
( , ) ( , ),( , ) ( , ),( , ) ( , ),
( , ) ( , )( , )
0( ) ( )
P
P
P
PP
ad fx fy d fx Fx
ad fx fy d fy Fy
ad fx Fx d fy Fy
cd fx Fy d fy FxJ Fx Fy
t dt t dt
for all x , y in X ,where 2p is an integer 0a and
0 1c then f and F have unique common fixed point in
X .
for all x , y in X ,where 2p is an integer 0a and 0 1c
then f and F have unique common fixed point in X .
II. MAIN RESULTS
We now prove the following related fixed point theorem.
Theorem 1.4 : Let ( , )X d , ( , )Y and ( , )Z be complete metric
spaces and suppose T is a continuous mapping of X into Y, S is a
continuous mapping of Y into Z and R is a continuous mapping of Z
into X satisfying the inequalities:
2
2
max{ ( , ') ( , '),( , ) ( , '),
', ' , ' ,( , ') , ' ', }
0 0max{ ( , ') ( , '),( , ) ( , '),
, ' ( ', '( , ')
0 0
.......... 1
c d x RSTx y yd x RSTx d RSTx RSTxd x RSTx z z
d RSTx RSTx d x x d x RSTx
c y TRSy z zy TRSy TRSy TRSy
d x x y TRSyTRSy TRSy
t dt t dt
t dt t dt
2
),( ', ) ( , ')}
max{ ( ', ') , ' ,( ', ') ( , ),( ', ') , ' ,
( , ') ', ( , ')}
0 0
......... 2
.......... 3
y TRSy y y
c z STRz d x xz STRz z STRzz STRz y y
STRz STRz z STRz z zt dt t dt
for all , 'x x in X, , 'y y in Y and , 'z z in Z where 0 1c . Then
RST has a unique fixed point u in X, TRS has a unique fixed point v
in Y and STR has a unique fixed point w in Z. Further, Tu = v, Sv =
w and Rw = u.
Proof : Let 0x be an arbitrary point in X. Define the sequence
,n nx y nz,
0 1, ,n
n n n n nx RST x y Tx z Sy for 1,2...........n .
Applying inequality (1) we have
2 21 1
1 1 11 1 1
( , ) ( , )
0 0max{ ( , ) ( , ), ( , ) ( , ),
, , , , , }
0.
n n n n
n n n n n n n n
n n n n n n n n
d RSTx RSTx d x x
c d x RSTx y y d x RSTx d x RSTxd x RSTx z z d x x d x RSTx
t dt t dt
t dt
1 11 1
1 121 1
max{ ( , ) ( , ),( , ) ( , ),
, , ,( , ) , , }
0 0.
n n n n
n n n n
n n n nn n
n n n n
c d x x y yd x x d x xd x x z z
d x x d x x d x xt dt t dt
1
11 1
max{ ( , ),( , ) , , , }
0 0........ 4
n nn n
n n n n
c y yd x x
z z d x xt dt t dt
A Applying inequality (2) we have
2 21 1
11 1 11
1 1
( , ) ( , )
0 0max{ ( , ) ( , ),( , ) ( , ),
, ( , ),( , ) ( , )}
0
n n n n
n n n n
n n n n
n n n n
n n n n
TRSy TRSy y y
c y TRSy z zy TRSy TRSy TRSy
d x x y TRSyy TRSy y y
t dt t dt
t dt
1 11 1
2 1 11
1
max{ ( , ) ( , ),( , ) ( , ),
, ( , ),( , ) ( , ) ( , )}
0 0
n n n n
n n n n
n n n nn n
n n n n
c y y z zy y y y
d x x y yy y
y y y yt dt t dt
1 1 1 1( , ) max ( , ), , , ( , )
0 0...... 5n n n n n n n ny y c z z d x x y y
t dt t dt
Now, applying inequality (3) we have
2 21 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
( , ) ( , )
0 0
max{ ( , ) , , ( , ) ( , ),( , ) , , ( , )}
0
n n n n
n n n n n n n n
n n n n n n n n
STRz STRz z z
c z STRz d x x z STRz z STRz
z STRz y y z STRz z z
t dt t dt
t dt
2 1 1 1 1
11 1 1
max{ ( , ) , , ( , ) ( , ),( , ) ( , ) , , ( , )}0 0
n n n n n n n nn n
n n n n n n n n
c z z d x x z z z zz z
z z y y z z z zt dt t dt
1 1 1 1( , ) max{ , , , ( , )}
0 0......... 6n n n n n n n nz z c d x x y y z z
t dt t dt
It
follows easily by induction on using inequalities (4), (5) and (6) that
1
1 1 1 1( , ) max{ ( , ), , , , }
0 0
nn n n n n n n nd x x c y y z z d x x
t dt t dt
1
1 1 1 1( , ) max{ ( , ), , , ( , )}
0 0
nn n n n n n n ny y c z z d x x y y
t dt t dt
1
1 1 1 1( , ) max{ , , , ( , )}
0 0
nn n n n n n n nz z c d x x y y z z
t dt t dt
Since c < 1, it follows that ,n nx y nz are Cauchy
sequences with limits u, v and w in X, Y and Z respectively. Since T
and S are continuous, we have
Using inequality (1) again we have
lim lim , lim lim .n n n nn n n n
y Tx Tu v z Sy Sv w
Manish Kumar Mishra et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES
Vol No. 2, Issue No. 1, 104 - 107
ISSN: 2230-7818 @ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved. Page 105
IJAEST
2
2 2
2 21
1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1
2
1 1
( , ) ( , )
0 0max{ ( , ) ( , ), ( , ) ( , ),
, , , , , }
0
( , )
0max{ ( , ) ( , ), ( , )
0
.
n n
n n n n
n n n n n
n
n n n
d RSTu RSTx d RSTu x
c d x RSTx y v d u RSTu d RSTu RSTxd x RSTx w z d u x d x RSTu
d RSTu x
c d x x y v d u RSTu d
t dt t dt
t dt
t dt
t dt
1 1 1 1
( , ),, , , , , } .
n
n n n n n
RSTu xd x x w z d u x d x RSTu
Since T and S are continuous, it follows on letting n tend to infinity
that
2 2( , ) ( , )
0 0
( , ) ( , )
0 0
d RSTu u cd RSTu u
d RSTu u cd RSTu u
t dt t dt
t dt t dt
Thus RSTu = u, as 1, 1c c and so u is a fixed point of RST.
Now, we have TRSv TRSTu Tu v
And so STRw STRSv Sv w
Hence v and w are fixed points of TRS and STR respectively.
We now prove the uniqueness of the fixed point u. Suppose
that RST has a second fixed point u', and then using
inequality (1), we have
2 2
2 2
( , ') ( , ')
0 0max{ ( ', ') ( , '), ( , ) ( , '),
', ' , ' , , ' ', }
0
( , ') ( , ')
0 0
( , ') ( , ')
0 0
. .
1, 1,
d u u d RSTu RSTu
c d u RSTu Tu Tu d u RSTu d RSTu RSTud u RSTu STu STu d u u d u RSTu
d u u c d u u
d u u c d u u
t dt t dt
t dt
i e t dt t dt
t dt t dt
as c c henc
'.e u u
This shows that u is a unique fixed point of RST.
Similarly, it can be proved that v is a unique fixed point of TRS
and w is a unique fixed point of STR.
Rw RSTRw RST Rwand so Rw is a fixed point of RST. Since
u is a unique fixed point of RST, it follows that Rw = u. We now
prove the following another theorem.
Theorem 1.5 : Let ( , )X d , ( , )Y and ( , )Z be complete
metric spaces and suppose T is a continuous mapping of X into Y, S
is a continuous mapping of Y into Z and R is a continuous mapping
of Z into X satisfying the inequalities:
( , ') ( , ')max{ ( , '), ( ', )} max{ ( ', '), ( ', ')
0 0( , ') ( , ')
max{ ( ', ), ( ', ')} max{ ( , ), ( ', ')}
0 0
0
...... 7
..... 8
d RSTx RSTx c STx STxd x RSTx d x RSTx z STRz d x RSTx
TRSy TRSy cd RSy RSyy TRSy y TRSy d x RSTx y TRSy
t dt t dt
t dt t dt
t dt
( , ') ( , ')
max{ ( ', '), ( ', ')} max{ ( ', '), ( ', ')}
0..... 9
STRz STRz c TRz TRzz STRz z STRz z STRz y TRSy
t dt
for all , 'x x in X, , 'y y in Y and , 'z z in Z where 0 1c . Then
RST has a unique fixed point u in X, TRS has a unique fixed point v
in Y and STR has a unique fixed point w in Z. Further, Tu = v, Sv =
w and Rw = u.
Proof : Let 0x be an arbitrary point in X. Define the sequence
,n nx y nzX, Y and Z respectively
by 0 1, ,n
n n n n nx RST x y Tx z Sy for 1,2...........n .
Applying inequality (7) we have
1 1 1
1
( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , )}
0( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , )
0
n n n n n n
n n n n n n
d RSTx RSTx d x x d x RSTx
c STx STx z STRz d x RSTx
t dt
t dt
1 1
1 1 1
( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , )}
0( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , )}
0
n n n n n n
n n n n n n
d x x d x x d x x
c z z z z d x x
t dt
t dt
and so either
2
1 1 1( , ) ( , ) ( , )
0 0
n n n n n nd x x c z z d x x
t dt t dt
which implies that
1 1( , ) ( , )
0 0
n n n nd x x c z z
t dt t dt
or
which implies that
1 1( , ) ( , )
0 0
n n n nd x x b z z
t dt t dt
where 1b c c .
Thus either case implies
that
1 1( , ) ( , )
0 0..........................(10)n n n nd x x b z z
t dt t dt
Applying inequality (9) we have
1 1 1 1 1( , )max{ ( , ), ( , )} ( , )max{ ( , ), ( , )}
0 0
n n n n n n n n n n n nz z z z z z c y y z z y y
t dt t dt
and so either
2
1 1 1( , ) ( , ) ( , )
0 0
n n n n n nz z c y y z z
t dt t dt
which implies that
1 1( , ) ( , )
0 0
n n n nz z c y y
t dt t dt
or
2 2
1 1( , ) ( , )
0 0
n n n nz z c y y
t dt t dt
it follows as above that
1 1( , ) ( , )
0 0.........................(11)n n n nz z b y y
t dt t dt
applying inequality (8) we have
1 1
1 1 1
( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , )}
0( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , )}
0
n n n n n n
n n n n n n
y y y y y y
cd x x d x x y y
t dt
t dt
2 2
1 1( , ) ( , )
0 0
n n n nd x x c z z
t dt t dt
Manish Kumar Mishra et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES
Vol No. 2, Issue No. 1, 104 - 107
ISSN: 2230-7818 @ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved. Page 106
IJAEST
and it follows as above that
1 1( , ) ( , )
0 0.........(12)n n n ny y bd x x
t dt t dt
It now follows from inequalities (10), (11) and (12) that
1 1
21
30 1
( , ) ( , )
0 0
( , )
0
( , )
0...............
n n n n
n n
n
x x b z z
b y y
b d x x
t dt t dt
t dt
t dt
0 1,b it follows that ,n nx y nz
sequences with limits u, v and w in X, Y and Z respectively. Since T
and S are continuous, we have
lim lim ,..................................... 13
lim lim ...................................... 14
n nn n
n nn n
y Tx Tu v
z Sy Sw w
inequality (7) again we have
1 1
1 1
( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , )}
0( , ) max{ ( , ), ( , )
0
n n n n
n n n n n
d RSTu x d x x d x RSTu
c STu x z z d x x
t dt
t dt
Since T and S are continuous, it follows on letting n tend to infinity
that
Thus RSTu = u, and so u is a fixed point of RST.
It now follows from equalities (13), (14)
Hence v and w are fixed points of TRS and STR respectively
Hence v and w are .
We now prove the uniqueness of the fixed point u. Suppose
that RST has a second fixed point u', and then using
inequality (7), we have
( , ') max{ ( ', '), ( ', )}
0( , ') max{ ( ', '), ( ', ')}
0
d RSTu RSTu d u RSTu d u RSTu
c STu STu STu STRu d u RSTu
t dt
t dt
which implies that
2 ( , ')
00
d u u
t dt
hence 'u u '
This shows that u is a unique fixed point of RST.
Similarly, it can be proved that v is a unique fixed point of TRS and
w is a unique fixed point of STR.it can be proved that v is a unique
fixed point of TRS and w is a unique fixed point of STR.
We finally prove that we also have Rw = u. To do this note that Rw
RSTRw RST Rw and so Rw is a fixed point of RST. Since u is a
uniquefixed point of RST, it follows that Rw = u.
This completes the proof.
REFERENCES
[1] B. Fisher: Related fixed points on two metric spaces, Math.Sem.Notes,Kobe Univ., 10(1982), 17-26.
[2] N.P. Nung: A fixed point theorem in three metric spaces, Math.Sem.Notes,Kobe Univ., 11(1983), 77-79.
[3] .K. Jain, H.K. Sahu and B. Fisher: Related fixed point theorem for three metric spaces, NOVI SAD J.Math.VOL.26, No.1, (1996), 11-17.
[4] Deo Brat Ojha, Manish Kumar Mishra and Udayana Katoch,A Common Fixed Point Theorem Satisfying Integral Type for Occasionally Weakly Compatible Maps, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 2(3): 239-244, 2010.
[5] Rhoades, B.E.,Two fixed point theorem for mapping satisfying a general contractiv condition of integral type. Int. J. Math. Sci., 3: 2003 4007-4013.
[6] K. Ansari , Manish Sharma and Arun Garg, “ Related Fixed Points Theorems on Three Metric Spaces” , Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 5, 2010, no. 42, 2059 – 2064.
2 ( , )
00
d RSTu u
t dt
TRSv TRSTu T(RSTu) Tu vAnd so
( )STRw STRSv S TRSv Sv w
Manish Kumar Mishra et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES
Vol No. 2, Issue No. 1, 104 - 107
ISSN: 2230-7818 @ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved. Page 107
IJAEST