14th day retention rates: first-time degree- and ... · of students who leave higher education...

Fall-to-Spring and Fall-to-Fall

14th Day Retention Rates: First-Time Degree- and Certificate-Seeking Students

Fall Entry Cohorts: 2007 - 2012

April, 2013

Anne L. Fulkerson, Ph.D.

Institutional Effectiveness

Table of Contents

Report Background and Qualifications………………………………………………………………....... 1 - 3 Toledo + Findlay Combined……………...………………………………………………………………. 4 - 23

Toledo + Findlay Combined…....………………………………………………………………… 5 - 6

by Campus and Location ………………………………………………………………………… 7 - 8

by Gender…………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 - 10 by Ethnicity………………………………………………………………………………………... 11 - 12 by Gender and Ethnicity………………………………………………………………………….... 13 - 15

by Age…………………………………………………………………...………………………… 16 - 17 by Full-Time/Part-Time Status …………………………………………………………………… 18 - 19 by High School GPA……………………………………………………………………………… 20 - 21

by EFC...………………………………………………………………......................................... 22 - 23

Toledo Campus………………………….………………………………………………………………… 24 - 45

by Gender…………………………………………………………………………………………. 25 - 26 by Ethnicity………………………………………………………………………………………... 27 - 28 by Gender and Ethnicity…………………………………………………………………………... 29 - 31

by Age…………………………………………………………………...………………………… 32 - 33

by Full-Time/Part-Time Status …………………………………………………………………… 34 - 35 by High School GPA……………………………………………………………………………… 36 - 37

by EFC...………………………………………………………………......................................... 38 - 39 by City of Residence ……………………………………………………………………………… 40 - 46 by Major…………………………………………………………………………………………… 47 - 48

Findlay Campus………………………….……………………………………………………………….. 49 - 67

by Gender…………………………………………………………………………………………. 50 - 51 by Ethnicity……………………………………………………………………………………….. 52 - 53 by Gender and Ethnicity………………………………………………………………………….. 54 - 56

by Age…………………………………………………………………...………………………… 57 - 58

by Full-Time/Part-Time Status …………………………………………………………………… 59 - 60 by High School GPA……………………………………………………………………………… 61 - 62

by EFC...………………………………………………………………......................................... 63 - 64 by High School …………………………………………………………………………………… 65 - 69 by Major…………………………………………………………………………………………… 70 - 71

References…….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 72

Background As exemplified in the Strategic Plan and the Student Retention 2013 AQIP Action Project, retention is critical to the Owens Community College mission of student success. Research and theory on student retention indicates that students’ first year in college is key to their long-term persistence and degree completion, with the majority of students who leave higher education doing so within their first one to two academic terms (Noel, Levitz, & Saluri, 1985; Tinto, 1993). Acknowledging the importance of the first college year, in 2011, Owens developed a comprehensive retention plan focused on first-time degree- and certificate-seeking students. This plan was developed from student and employee input gathered through satisfaction surveys, focus groups, and college-wide planning sessions. It is organized around nine strategies aimed at increasing first-year retention: (1) implementing an early alert system, (2) expanding the use of peer educators, (3) reviewing programs and majors, (4) creating a referral-focused information system, (5) requiring orientation and a first year seminar, (6) increasing professional development for employees, (7) requiring advising, (8) providing comprehensive career services, and (9) increasing cohort programming. These strategies were intended to increase retention of all first-time degree- and certificate-seeking students but particularly to impact large student populations with historically lower retention rates on each campus. On the Toledo-area campus, targeted populations include city of Toledo residents, academically underprepared students (high school GPA < 2.04), 20- to 25-year-olds, high-enrolling majors (AA General Concentration, Criminal Justice, Business Management, Undeclared, Pre-Nursing, and Social Work), and students reporting a race/ethnicity other than White. On the Findlay-area campus, targeted populations include Findlay and Fostoria high school students, academically underprepared students (high school GPA < 2.22), 19- to 25-year-olds, high-enrolling majors (AA General Concentration, Criminal Justice, Business Management, Pre-Nursing, and Pre-LPN Certificate), and part-time students. The purpose of this report is to track the progress of retention efforts with these targeted populations on each campus.

Definitions and Report Qualifications There are many different ways to measure retention, and this report does not attempt to capture them all. To be as consistent as possible with federal reporting standards (i.e., IPEDS), this report focuses on first-time, degree- or certificate-seeking students enrolled in at least one credit-bearing class on the 14th day of the fall who either graduate or are re-enrolled for at least one credit-bearing course on the 14th day the following spring or fall terms (see definition and IPEDS retention reporting instructions below). Due to variations in the timing of data capture (i.e., 14th day for this report vs. a fluctuating day prior to October 15th on which the Banner IPEDS program is manually run), the retention rates in this report may differ slightly from those reported by IPEDS. IPEDS Glossary: A measure of the rate at which students persist in their educational program at an institution, expressed as a percentage. For four-year institutions, this is the percentage of first-time bachelors (or equivalent) degree-seeking undergraduates from the previous fall who are again enrolled in the current fall. For all other institutions this is the percentage of first-time degree/certificate-seeking students from the previous fall who either re-enrolled or successfully completed their program by the current fall.

1

Retention is calculated based on data submitted in the IPEDS Fall Enrollment Survey:

The intention is to update this report regularly in order to provide long-term trend information. However, it is important to recognize that over time, external reporting standards change and other changes take place to the college’s admission application and data systems. For example, in 2010, the college adopted the new federal reporting categories for race and ethnicity, which includes a new multi-racial category and primary assignment of Hispanic to students reporting an Hispanic ethnic origin (even if other races are also identified). Consequently, retention trends by race/ethnicity, may in part be a reflection of the new classification system. Another example is the increased enforcement of financial aid guidelines in recent years requiring that students be degree- or certificate-seeking in order to be eligible for federal aid. The result of this increased enforcement has been a shift in the number and percentage of students claiming to be degree- or certificate-seeking (in 2009, 48.3% of Owens students claimed to be degree- or certificate-seeking; in 2010, this percentage jumped to 73.1%). Consequently, fall retention cohorts after 2009 may be artificially inflated by students claiming to be degree- or certificate-seeking, and could in turn appear as an artificial decrease in retention rates. Changes to other data elements have also occurred and are anticipated to occur in the future as well. As these changes take place, trend information may be lost as it will not be possible to directly compare retention rates from before the change to after the change.

2

Another qualification to the present report is that it is purely descriptive in nature. This report does not seek to identify the relative association that different variables have with retention, nor does it attempt to determine the causes of retention rate differences and fluctuations. To be sure, a multitude of factors can contribute to retention rates, many of which are entirely outside of the college’s control, such as student circumstances, economic conditions, labor market fluctuations, and so on. This qualification is particularly important to keep in mind when interpreting retention rates for the different campuses, schools, and majors as retention rates are not a pure reflection of a campus’, school’s, or program’s efforts or success. There are also factors within the college’s control that may affect retention. For example, students are given academic dismissal, dropped from classes due to non-payment, not given a grade for a class, and so on. An additional caveat is that retention rates based on small cohort sizes can be highly unstable and should be interpreted with extreme caution. With small groups, the actions of just one or two individuals can have a dramatic impact on retention rates, leading to substantial fluctuations from year to year. Finally, the data in this report reflect students’ graduation from or re-enrollment at Owens only. Consequently, students who have left Owens but are enrolled elsewhere will appear as not retained in the tables and graphs that follow.

Report Highlights Overall, retention of first-time degree- and certificate-seeking students has been on the decline since 2007. From the Fall 2007 cohort to Fall 2011, fall-to-spring retention fell from 71.9% to 64.8% and fall-to-fall retention fell from 48.5% to 39.9%. Although fall-to-fall retention rates are not yet available for the most recent Fall 2012 cohort, fall-to-spring rates (which are typically a good leading indicator) are up 3.2 percentage points from Fall 2011, equating to a gain of approximately 68 students. This is the first increase in retention that has been observed since 2008 and is evident fairly across the board. Below are the groups experiencing a retention increase with the percentage gain: College +3.2% 20- to 25-year-olds +9.6% Findlay +2.7% Above 25-year-olds +3.5% Toledo +3.2% Full-time +3.2% Source +4.7% Part-time +4.7% Arrowhead +2.3% No high school GPA (Toledo) +5.6% Females +6.0% High school GPA 1.0-2.0 (Toledo) +8.9% Males (Toledo) +1.3% High school GPA 2.0-3.0 (Findlay) +9.6% Black students +4.6% High school GPA 3.0-4.0 (Toledo) +4.0% White students +3.7% Full Pell EFC +4.3% Non-white students (Toledo) +3.9% Partial Pell EFC +0.5% Hispanic females +5.6% Did not apply for financial aid +4.4% Under 18 +11.2% City of Toledo +4.4% 19-year-olds +2.2% Groups not yet experiencing a retention increase and the percentage change from last year are included below: Males (Findlay) -5.3% No high school GPA (Findlay) -0.6% Hispanic males -12.0% High school GPA 1.0-2.0 (Findlay) -11.1% Non-white students (Findlay) -10.2% High school GPA 2.0-3.0 (Toledo) -3.9% 18-year-olds -1.3% High school GPA 3.0-4.0 (Findlay) -5.0% Findlay high school -3.7% Not Pell eligible -0.4% Fostoria high school -7.9%

3

Toledo +

Findlay Combined

4

Fall‐to‐Spring and Fall‐to‐Fall Retention Rates (Re‐enrollment OR Graduation)

First‐Time Degree‐ or Certificate‐Seeking Students

Fall 2007 to Fall 2012

as of the 14th Day Census Point

Toledo + Findlay Combined

85%

90%

95%

100%Fall‐to‐Spring Retention

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

71.9% 74.2% 71.9% 69.9% 64.8% 68.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

71.9% 74.2% 71.9% 69.9% 64.8% 68.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


50%

55%

60%

65%

70%Fall‐to‐Fall Retention

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

71.9% 74.2% 71.9% 69.9% 64.8% 68.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

71.9% 74.2% 71.9% 69.9% 64.8% 68.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

48.5% 48.4% 44.3% 41.8% 39.9%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


5





Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

2007 2,020 1,452 71.9% 980 48.5%

2008 2,114 1,568 74.2% 1,023 48.4%

2009 2 800 2 014 71 9% 1 240 44 3%

Fall‐to‐Spring Fall‐to‐Fall

Toledo + Findlay Combined

2009 2,800 2,014 71.9% 1,240 44.3%

2010 2,934 2,051 69.9% 1,226 41.8%

2011 2,274 1,473 64.8% 907 39.9%

2012 2,144 1,457 68.0%

6





by Campus & Locationby Campus & Location

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201250%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 74.7% 74.9% 74.2% 68.6% 63.5% 66.2%

Toledo 71.2% 74.0% 71.4% 70.2% 65.1% 68.3%

Source 62.3% 72.6% 69.1% 57.6% 55.2% 59.9%

Arrowhead 64.2% 63.8% 66.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 74.7% 74.9% 74.2% 68.6% 63.5% 66.2%

Toledo 71.2% 74.0% 71.4% 70.2% 65.1% 68.3%

Source 62.3% 72.6% 69.1% 57.6% 55.2% 59.9%

Arrowhead 64.2% 63.8% 66.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 74.7% 74.9% 74.2% 68.6% 63.5% 66.2%

Toledo 71.2% 74.0% 71.4% 70.2% 65.1% 68.3%

Source 62.3% 72.6% 69.1% 57.6% 55.2% 59.9%

Arrowhead 64.2% 63.8% 66.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Fi dl 55 6% 50 2% 47 9% 42 0% 44 0%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


NOTE: Source and Arrowhead are subsets of Toledo and include students enrolled in

l h l i h d l b ll d i l h

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 74.7% 74.9% 74.2% 68.6% 63.5% 66.2%

Toledo 71.2% 74.0% 71.4% 70.2% 65.1% 68.3%

Source 62.3% 72.6% 69.1% 57.6% 55.2% 59.9%

Arrowhead 64.2% 63.8% 66.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Findlay 55.6% 50.2% 47.9% 42.0% 44.0%

Toledo 46.8% 47.9% 43.4% 41.7% 38.9%

Source 22.6% 46.5% 33.0% 26.6% 25.0%

Arrowhead 41.1% 43.3%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


at least one course at those locations. These students may also be enrolled in classes at other

locations and are included in the Toledo numbers.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 74.7% 74.9% 74.2% 68.6% 63.5% 66.2%

Toledo 71.2% 74.0% 71.4% 70.2% 65.1% 68.3%

Source 62.3% 72.6% 69.1% 57.6% 55.2% 59.9%

Arrowhead 64.2% 63.8% 66.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Findlay 55.6% 50.2% 47.9% 42.0% 44.0%

Toledo 46.8% 47.9% 43.4% 41.7% 38.9%

Source 22.6% 46.5% 33.0% 26.6% 25.0%

Arrowhead 41.1% 43.3%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


7





Campus Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Findlay 2007 396 296 74.7% 220 55.6%

2008 430 322 74.9% 216 50.2%

2009 530 393 74 2% 254 47 9%


by Campus & Location

2009 530 393 74.2% 254 47.9%

2010 560 384 68.6% 235 42.0%

2011 430 273 63.5% 189 44.0%

2012 334 221 66.2%

Toledo 2007 1,624 1,156 71.2% 760 46.8%

2008 1,684 1,246 74.0% 807 47.9%

2009 2,270 1,621 71.4% 986 43.4%2009 2,270 1,621 71.4% 986 43.4%

2010 2,374 1,667 70.2% 991 41.7%

2011 1,844 1,200 65.1% 718 38.9%

2012 1,810 1,236 68.3%

Source 2007 53 33 62.3% 12 22.6%

2008 157 114 72.6% 73 46.5%

2009 191 132 69.1% 63 33.0%

20 0 203 6% 26 6%2010 203 117 57.6% 54 26.6%

2011 192 106 55.2% 48 25.0%

2012 222 133 59.9%

Arrowhead 2007

2008

2009

2010 151 97 64.2% 62 41.1%2010 151 97 64.2% 62 41.1%

2011 127 81 63.8% 55 43.3%

2012 127 84 66.1%

NOTE: Source and Arrowhead are subsets of Toledo and include students enrolled in

at least one course at those locations. These students may also be enrolled in classes at other

locations and are included in the Toledo numbers.

8





by Gender (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

85%

90%

95%

100% Fall‐to‐Spring Retention

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.7% 76.4% 74.8% 73.9% 67.7% 73.7%

Male 68.6% 71.4% 68.9% 65.7% 61.7% 62.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.7% 76.4% 74.8% 73.9% 67.7% 73.7%

Male 68.6% 71.4% 68.9% 65.7% 61.7% 62.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


55%

60%

65%

70% Fall‐to‐Fall Retention

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.7% 76.4% 74.8% 73.9% 67.7% 73.7%

Male 68.6% 71.4% 68.9% 65.7% 61.7% 62.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.7% 76.4% 74.8% 73.9% 67.7% 73.7%

Male 68.6% 71.4% 68.9% 65.7% 61.7% 62.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Female 51.7% 51.4% 48.4% 44.3% 43.5%

Male 44.7% 44.7% 39.9% 39.1% 36.1%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.7% 76.4% 74.8% 73.9% 67.7% 73.7%

Male 68.6% 71.4% 68.9% 65.7% 61.7% 62.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Female 51.7% 51.4% 48.4% 44.3% 43.5%

Male 44.7% 44.7% 39.9% 39.1% 36.1%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


9





Gender Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Female 2007 1,102 823 74.7% 570 51.7%

2008 1,166 891 76.4% 599 51.4%

2009 1 443 1 079 74 8% 699 48 4%


by Gender (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

2009 1,443 1,079 74.8% 699 48.4%

2010 1,507 1,113 73.9% 668 44.3%

2011 1,164 788 67.7% 506 43.5%

2012 1,076 793 73.7%

Male 2007 917 629 68.6% 410 44.7%

2008 948 677 71.4% 424 44.7%

2009 1,356 934 68.9% 541 39.9%2009 1,356 934 68.9% 541 39.9%

2010 1,426 937 65.7% 558 39.1%

2011 1,110 685 61.7% 401 36.1%

2012 1,068 664 62.2%

10





by Ethnicity (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

80%

85%

90%

95%


55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 63.7% 65.2% 67.4% 59.0% 53.1% 57.7%

Hispanic 63.5% 70.4% 64.8% 65.0% 61.2% 58.1%

White 75.3% 77.3% 75.5% 74.5% 69.0% 72.7%

All Non‐White 63.4% 67.2% 65.7% 61.8% 57.0% 59.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 63.7% 65.2% 67.4% 59.0% 53.1% 57.7%

Hispanic 63.5% 70.4% 64.8% 65.0% 61.2% 58.1%

White 75.3% 77.3% 75.5% 74.5% 69.0% 72.7%

All Non‐White 63.4% 67.2% 65.7% 61.8% 57.0% 59.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 63.7% 65.2% 67.4% 59.0% 53.1% 57.7%

Hispanic 63.5% 70.4% 64.8% 65.0% 61.2% 58.1%

White 75.3% 77.3% 75.5% 74.5% 69.0% 72.7%

All Non‐White 63.4% 67.2% 65.7% 61.8% 57.0% 59.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 201120%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


NOTE: "All Non‐White" includes all students reporting a race other than White, including unknown.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 63.7% 65.2% 67.4% 59.0% 53.1% 57.7%

Hispanic 63.5% 70.4% 64.8% 65.0% 61.2% 58.1%

White 75.3% 77.3% 75.5% 74.5% 69.0% 72.7%

All Non‐White 63.4% 67.2% 65.7% 61.8% 57.0% 59.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 29.3% 33.4% 31.0% 27.0% 22.1%

Hispanic 43.3% 39.3% 34.6% 39.1% 29.1%

White 54.7% 54.0% 50.0% 47.7% 47.3%

All Non‐White 33.0% 35.7% 34.4% 31.2% 26.2%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


NOTE: All Non White includes all students reporting a race other than White, including unknown.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 63.7% 65.2% 67.4% 59.0% 53.1% 57.7%

Hispanic 63.5% 70.4% 64.8% 65.0% 61.2% 58.1%

White 75.3% 77.3% 75.5% 74.5% 69.0% 72.7%

All Non‐White 63.4% 67.2% 65.7% 61.8% 57.0% 59.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 29.3% 33.4% 31.0% 27.0% 22.1%

Hispanic 43.3% 39.3% 34.6% 39.1% 29.1%

White 54.7% 54.0% 50.0% 47.7% 47.3%

All Non‐White 33.0% 35.7% 34.4% 31.2% 26.2%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


11

Ethnicity Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

by Ethnicity (Toledo + Findlay Combined)






y

American Indian 2007 9 3 33.3% 2 22.2%

2008 17 10 58.8% 5 29.4%

2009 13 8 61.5% 4 30.8%

2010 11 9 81.8% 2 18.2%

2011 13 12 92.3% 8 61.5%

2012 10 7 70.0%

Asian 2007 22 11 50.0% 5 22.7%

2008 17 12 70.6% 5 29.4%

2009 16 14 87.5% 10 62.5%

2010 23 18 78.3% 10 43.5%

2011 10 9 90 0% 7 70 0%2011 10 9 90.0% 7 70.0%

2012 14 9 64.3%

Black 2007 314 200 63.7% 92 29.3%

2008 356 232 65.2% 119 33.4%

2009 509 343 67.4% 158 31.0%

2010 649 383 59.0% 175 27.0%

2011 461 245 53.1% 102 22.1%

2012 449 259 57.7%

Hispanic 2007 104 66 63.5% 45 43.3%

2008 135 95 70.4% 53 39.3%

2009 159 103 64.8% 55 34.6%

2010 243 158 65.0% 95 39.1%

2011 196 120 61.2% 57 29.1%

2012 172 100 58.1%

Pacific Islander 2007 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%

2008 5 0.0% 0.0%

2009 1 1 100.0% 0.0%

2010 1 0.0% 0.0%

2011 1 0.0% 0 0.0%

2012

White 2007 1,444 1,087 75.3% 790 54.7%

2008 1 464 1 131 77 3% 791 54 0%2008 1,464 1,131 77.3% 791 54.0%

2009 1,774 1,340 75.5% 887 50.0%

2010 1,883 1,402 74.5% 898 47.7%

2011 1,477 1,019 69.0% 698 47.3%

2012 1,365 992 72.7%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 81 52 64.2% 29 35.8%

2011 81 48 59.3% 26 32.1%

2012 64 40 62.5%

Data were not collected prior to 2010

Unknown 2007 125 84 67.2% 45 36.0%

2008 120 88 73.3% 50 41.7%

2009 328 205 62.5% 126 38.4%

2010 43 29 67.4% 17 39.5%

2011 35 20 57.1% 9 25.7%

2012 70 50 71.4%

All Non‐White 2007 576 365 63.4% 190 33.0%

2008 650 437 67.2% 232 35.7%

2009 1,026 674 65.7% 353 34.4%

2010 1,051 649 61.8% 328 31.2%

2011 797 454 57 0% 209 26 2%2011 797 454 57.0% 209 26.2%

2012 779 465 59.7%


12





by Gender & Ethnicity (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

85%90%95%

100%

Fall‐to‐Spring Retention: Females

55%60%65%70%

Fall‐to‐Fall Retention: Females

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%


20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.1% 68.8% 72.0% 62.7% 55.7% 67.7%

Hispanic 68.7% 73.4% 56.6% 65.6% 62.6% 68.2%

White 77.4% 79.2% 78.7% 78.8% 72.6% 76.5%

All Non‐White 68.5% 70.4% 67.6% 64.7% 58.7% 68.5%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 35.9% 36.5% 36.6% 30.7% 23.6%

Hispanic 47.8% 46.8% 31.3% 40.5% 31.8%

White 57.2% 57.1% 54.8% 49.4% 52.1%

All Non‐White 39.0% 39.2% 36.7% 35.0% 27.7%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.1% 68.8% 72.0% 62.7% 55.7% 67.7%

Hispanic 68.7% 73.4% 56.6% 65.6% 62.6% 68.2%

White 77.4% 79.2% 78.7% 78.8% 72.6% 76.5%

All Non‐White 68.5% 70.4% 67.6% 64.7% 58.7% 68.5%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%


85%90%95%100%

Fall‐to‐Spring Retention: Males

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 35.9% 36.5% 36.6% 30.7% 23.6%

Hispanic 47.8% 46.8% 31.3% 40.5% 31.8%

White 57.2% 57.1% 54.8% 49.4% 52.1%

All Non‐White 39.0% 39.2% 36.7% 35.0% 27.7%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


55%60%65%70%

Fall‐to‐Fall Retention: Males

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.1% 68.8% 72.0% 62.7% 55.7% 67.7%

Hispanic 68.7% 73.4% 56.6% 65.6% 62.6% 68.2%

White 77.4% 79.2% 78.7% 78.8% 72.6% 76.5%

All Non‐White 68.5% 70.4% 67.6% 64.7% 58.7% 68.5%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201240%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 35.9% 36.5% 36.6% 30.7% 23.6%

Hispanic 47.8% 46.8% 31.3% 40.5% 31.8%

White 57.2% 57.1% 54.8% 49.4% 52.1%

All Non‐White 39.0% 39.2% 36.7% 35.0% 27.7%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 201120%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.1% 68.8% 72.0% 62.7% 55.7% 67.7%

Hispanic 68.7% 73.4% 56.6% 65.6% 62.6% 68.2%

White 77.4% 79.2% 78.7% 78.8% 72.6% 76.5%

All Non‐White 68.5% 70.4% 67.6% 64.7% 58.7% 68.5%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 56.8% 60.1% 62.2% 55.4% 50.2% 48.0%

Hispanic 54.1% 66.1% 73.7% 64.3% 59.6% 47.6%

White 72.9% 74.9% 72.0% 69.7% 65.2% 68.7%

All Non‐White 56.6% 62.9% 63.8% 58.7% 55.1% 51.5%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 35.9% 36.5% 36.6% 30.7% 23.6%

Hispanic 47.8% 46.8% 31.3% 40.5% 31.8%

White 57.2% 57.1% 54.8% 49.4% 52.1%

All Non‐White 39.0% 39.2% 36.7% 35.0% 27.7%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 20.5% 29.1% 24.9% 23.2% 20.5%

Hispanic 35.1% 28.6% 38.2% 37.5% 25.8%

White 51.9% 50.4% 44.6% 45.9% 42.2%

All Non‐White 24.8% 30.9% 32.2% 27.4% 24.7%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.1% 68.8% 72.0% 62.7% 55.7% 67.7%

Hispanic 68.7% 73.4% 56.6% 65.6% 62.6% 68.2%

White 77.4% 79.2% 78.7% 78.8% 72.6% 76.5%

All Non‐White 68.5% 70.4% 67.6% 64.7% 58.7% 68.5%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 56.8% 60.1% 62.2% 55.4% 50.2% 48.0%

Hispanic 54.1% 66.1% 73.7% 64.3% 59.6% 47.6%

White 72.9% 74.9% 72.0% 69.7% 65.2% 68.7%

All Non‐White 56.6% 62.9% 63.8% 58.7% 55.1% 51.5%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 35.9% 36.5% 36.6% 30.7% 23.6%

Hispanic 47.8% 46.8% 31.3% 40.5% 31.8%

White 57.2% 57.1% 54.8% 49.4% 52.1%

All Non‐White 39.0% 39.2% 36.7% 35.0% 27.7%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 20.5% 29.1% 24.9% 23.2% 20.5%

Hispanic 35.1% 28.6% 38.2% 37.5% 25.8%

White 51.9% 50.4% 44.6% 45.9% 42.2%

All Non‐White 24.8% 30.9% 32.2% 27.4% 24.7%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


13







Gender Ethnicity Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Female American Indian 2007 2 0.0% 0.0%

2008 11 6 54.5% 3 27.3%

2009 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%

2010 3 3 100.0% 1 33.3%

2011 4 4 100.0% 3 75.0%

2012 7 5 71.4%

Asian 2007 16 10 62.5% 4 25.0%

2008 14 12 85 7% 5 35 7%


2008 14 12 85.7% 5 35.7%

2009 6 6 100.0% 3 50.0%

2010 11 9 81.8% 5 45.5%

2011 2 2 100.0% 2 100.0%

2012 5 5 100.0%

Black 2007 181 125 69.1% 65 35.9%

2008 208 143 68.8% 76 36.5%

2009 268 193 72.0% 98 36.6%

2010 322 202 62.7% 99 30.7%

2011 246 137 55.7% 58 23.6%2011 246 137 55.7% 58 23.6%

2012 220 149 67.7%

Hispanic 2007 67 46 68.7% 32 47.8%

2008 79 58 73.4% 37 46.8%

2009 83 47 56.6% 26 31.3%

2010 131 86 65.6% 53 40.5%

2011 107 67 62.6% 34 31.8%

2012 88 60 68.2%


2008 5 0.0% 0.0%2008 5 0.0% 0.0%

2009

2010

2011 1 0.0% 0 0.0%

2012

White 2007 769 595 77.4% 440 57.2%

2008 794 629 79.2% 453 57.1%

2009 934 735 78.7% 512 54.8%

2010 978 771 78.8% 483 49.4%

2011 752 546 72.6% 392 52.1%2011 752 546 72.6% 392 52.1%

2012 701 536 76.5%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 43 31 72.1% 20 46.5%

2011 44 26 59.1% 14 31.8%

2012 31 19 61.3%

Unknown 2007 65 46 70.8% 28 43.1%

2008 55 43 78.2% 25 45.5%


008 55 43 78. % 5 45.5%

2009 146 94 64.4% 58 39.7%

2010 19 11 57.9% 7 36.8%

2011 8 6 75.0% 3 37.5%

2012 24 19 79.2%

All Non‐White 2007 333 228 68.5% 130 39.0%

2008 372 262 70.4% 146 39.2%

2009 509 344 67.6% 187 36.7%

2010 529 342 64.7% 185 35.0%

2011 412 242 58.7% 114 27.7%

2012 375 257 68.5%

14









Male American Indian 2007 7 3 42.9% 2 28.6%

2008 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%

2009 7 4 57.1% 2 28.6%

2010 8 6 75.0% 1 12.5%

2011 9 8 88.9% 5 55.6%

2012 3 2 66.7%

Asian 2007 6 1 16.7% 1 16.7%

2008 3 0 0% 0 0%2008 3 0.0% 0.0%

2009 10 8 80.0% 7 70.0%

2010 12 9 75.0% 5 41.7%

2011 8 7 87.5% 5 62.5%

2012 9 4 44.4%

Black 2007 132 75 56.8% 27 20.5%

2008 148 89 60.1% 43 29.1%

2009 241 150 62.2% 60 24.9%

2010 327 181 55.4% 76 23.2%

2011 215 108 50.2% 44 20.5%2011 215 108 50.2% 44 20.5%

2012 229 110 48.0%

Hispanic 2007 37 20 54.1% 13 35.1%

2008 56 37 66.1% 16 28.6%

2009 76 56 73.7% 29 38.2%

2010 112 72 64.3% 42 37.5%

2011 89 53 59.6% 23 25.8%

2012 84 40 47.6%

Pacific Islander 2007

20082008

2009 1 1 100.0% 0.0%

2010 1 0.0% 0.0%

2011

2012

White 2007 675 492 72.9% 350 51.9%

2008 670 502 74.9% 338 50.4%

2009 840 605 72.0% 375 44.6%

2010 905 631 69.7% 415 45.9%

2011 725 473 65.2% 306 42.2%2011 725 473 65.2% 306 42.2%

2012 664 456 68.7%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 38 21 55.3% 9 23.7%

2011 37 22 59.5% 12 32.4%

2012 33 21 63.6%

Unknown 2007 60 38 63.3% 17 28.3%

2008 65 45 69.2% 25 38.5%


008 65 45 69. % 5 38.5%

2009 181 110 60.8% 68 37.6%

2010 23 17 73.9% 10 43.5%

2011 27 14 51.9% 6 22.2%

2012 46 31 67.4%

All Non‐White 2007 242 137 56.6% 60 24.8%

2008 278 175 62.9% 86 30.9%

2009 516 329 63.8% 166 32.2%

2010 521 306 58.7% 143 27.4%

2011 385 212 55.1% 95 24.7%

2012 404 208 51.5%


15

Fall‐to‐Spring and Fall‐to‐Fall Retention Rates (Re‐enrollment or Graduation)




by Age (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201250%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 74.1% 78.3% 78.5% 83.3% 63.8% 75.0%

18 79.0% 79.2% 79.7% 78.5% 74.5% 73.2%

19 71.0% 70.0% 68.8% 67.9% 63.5% 65.7%

20 ‐ 25 64.7% 67.2% 68.4% 61.6% 52.6% 62.2%

Above 25 67.0% 75.0% 67.5% 68.3% 63.4% 66.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 74.1% 78.3% 78.5% 83.3% 63.8% 75.0%

18 79.0% 79.2% 79.7% 78.5% 74.5% 73.2%

19 71.0% 70.0% 68.8% 67.9% 63.5% 65.7%

20 ‐ 25 64.7% 67.2% 68.4% 61.6% 52.6% 62.2%

Above 25 67.0% 75.0% 67.5% 68.3% 63.4% 66.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 74.1% 78.3% 78.5% 83.3% 63.8% 75.0%

18 79.0% 79.2% 79.7% 78.5% 74.5% 73.2%

19 71.0% 70.0% 68.8% 67.9% 63.5% 65.7%

20 ‐ 25 64.7% 67.2% 68.4% 61.6% 52.6% 62.2%

Above 25 67.0% 75.0% 67.5% 68.3% 63.4% 66.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Less than 18 55 2% 50 0% 53 8% 63 0% 40 4%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 74.1% 78.3% 78.5% 83.3% 63.8% 75.0%

18 79.0% 79.2% 79.7% 78.5% 74.5% 73.2%

19 71.0% 70.0% 68.8% 67.9% 63.5% 65.7%

20 ‐ 25 64.7% 67.2% 68.4% 61.6% 52.6% 62.2%

Above 25 67.0% 75.0% 67.5% 68.3% 63.4% 66.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Less than 18 55.2% 50.0% 53.8% 63.0% 40.4%

18 56.4% 55.7% 54.3% 49.3% 49.9%

19 49.5% 44.7% 43.3% 38.3% 37.9%

20 ‐ 25 36.5% 37.0% 34.0% 31.4% 29.2%

Above 25 45.1% 49.8% 42.2% 43.4% 36.9%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 74.1% 78.3% 78.5% 83.3% 63.8% 75.0%

18 79.0% 79.2% 79.7% 78.5% 74.5% 73.2%

19 71.0% 70.0% 68.8% 67.9% 63.5% 65.7%

20 ‐ 25 64.7% 67.2% 68.4% 61.6% 52.6% 62.2%

Above 25 67.0% 75.0% 67.5% 68.3% 63.4% 66.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Less than 18 55.2% 50.0% 53.8% 63.0% 40.4%

18 56.4% 55.7% 54.3% 49.3% 49.9%

19 49.5% 44.7% 43.3% 38.3% 37.9%

20 ‐ 25 36.5% 37.0% 34.0% 31.4% 29.2%

Above 25 45.1% 49.8% 42.2% 43.4% 36.9%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


16





Age Category Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Less than 18 2007 58 43 74.1% 32 55.2%

2008 60 47 78.3% 30 50.0%

2009 65 51 78 5% 35 53 8%


by Age (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

2009 65 51 78.5% 35 53.8%

2010 54 45 83.3% 34 63.0%

2011 47 30 63.8% 19 40.4%

2012 52 39 75.0%

18 2007 762 602 79.0% 430 56.4%

2008 828 656 79.2% 461 55.7%

2009 862 687 79.7% 468 54.3%2009 862 687 79.7% 468 54.3%

2010 879 690 78.5% 433 49.3%

2011 792 590 74.5% 395 49.9%

2012 769 563 73.2%

19 2007 321 228 71.0% 159 49.5%

2008 340 238 70.0% 152 44.7%

2009 430 296 68.8% 186 43.3%

20 0 39 298 6 9% 68 38 3%2010 439 298 67.9% 168 38.3%

2011 364 231 63.5% 138 37.9%

2012 353 232 65.7%

20 ‐ 25 2007 436 282 64.7% 159 36.5%

2008 478 321 67.2% 177 37.0%

2009 711 486 68.4% 242 34.0%

2010 726 447 61.6% 228 31.4%2010 726 447 61.6% 228 31.4%

2011 527 277 52.6% 154 29.2%

2012 550 342 62.2%

Above 25 2007 443 297 67.0% 200 45.1%

2008 408 306 75.0% 203 49.8%

2009 732 494 67.5% 309 42.2%

2010 836 571 68.3% 363 43.4%

2011 544 345 63.4% 201 36.9%

2012 420 281 66.9%

17





/by Full‐Time/Part‐Time Status (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

85%

90%

95%


60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 78.9% 80.9% 78.4% 74.8% 69.6% 72.8%

Part‐Time 59.0% 61.0% 57.8% 57.7% 55.3% 60.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 78.9% 80.9% 78.4% 74.8% 69.6% 72.8%

Part‐Time 59.0% 61.0% 57.8% 57.7% 55.3% 60.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 78.9% 80.9% 78.4% 74.8% 69.6% 72.8%

Part‐Time 59.0% 61.0% 57.8% 57.7% 55.3% 60.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


NOTE: Full‐time includes students attempting 12 credit hours or more; part‐time includes

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 78.9% 80.9% 78.4% 74.8% 69.6% 72.8%

Part‐Time 59.0% 61.0% 57.8% 57.7% 55.3% 60.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Full‐Time 52.9% 54.9% 48.0% 43.7% 43.4%

Part‐Time 40.4% 35.6% 36.1% 37.0% 33.0%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


NOTE: Full time includes students attempting 12 credit hours or more; part time includes

students attempting less than 12 credit hours.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 78.9% 80.9% 78.4% 74.8% 69.6% 72.8%

Part‐Time 59.0% 61.0% 57.8% 57.7% 55.3% 60.0%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Full‐Time 52.9% 54.9% 48.0% 43.7% 43.4%

Part‐Time 40.4% 35.6% 36.1% 37.0% 33.0%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


18





/

Campus Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Full‐Time 2007 1,308 1,032 78.9% 692 52.9%

2008 1,398 1,131 80.9% 768 54.9%

2009 1 921 1 506 78 4% 923 48 0%


by Full‐Time/Part‐Time Status (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

2009 1,921 1,506 78.4% 923 48.0%

2010 2,091 1,565 74.8% 914 43.7%

2011 1,505 1,048 69.6% 653 43.4%

2012 1,336 972 72.8%

Part‐Time 2007 712 420 59.0% 288 40.4%

2008 716 437 61.0% 255 35.6%

2009 879 508 57.8% 317 36.1%2009 879 508 57.8% 317 36.1%

2010 843 486 57.7% 312 37.0%

2011 769 425 55.3% 254 33.0%

2012 808 485 60.0%



19





High School GPA

by High School GPA (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

80%

85%

90%

95%


55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.0% 60.8% 61.1% 58.7% 50.8% 55.6%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 65.9% 70.9% 68.4% 68.7% 55.8% 62.3%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.7% 78.8% 77.8% 73.7% 71.6% 69.9%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 87.0% 88.2% 84.7% 88.0% 83.6% 85.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.0% 60.8% 61.1% 58.7% 50.8% 55.6%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 65.9% 70.9% 68.4% 68.7% 55.8% 62.3%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.7% 78.8% 77.8% 73.7% 71.6% 69.9%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 87.0% 88.2% 84.7% 88.0% 83.6% 85.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.0% 60.8% 61.1% 58.7% 50.8% 55.6%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 65.9% 70.9% 68.4% 68.7% 55.8% 62.3%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.7% 78.8% 77.8% 73.7% 71.6% 69.9%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 87.0% 88.2% 84.7% 88.0% 83.6% 85.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.0% 60.8% 61.1% 58.7% 50.8% 55.6%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 65.9% 70.9% 68.4% 68.7% 55.8% 62.3%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.7% 78.8% 77.8% 73.7% 71.6% 69.9%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 87.0% 88.2% 84.7% 88.0% 83.6% 85.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Blank 37.1% 34.3% 33.1% 31.2% 26.8%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 34.9% 40.4% 31.4% 36.4% 28.9%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 51.4% 52.3% 51.0% 45.5% 43.2%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 68.2% 70.0% 65.6% 63.0% 66.7%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.0% 60.8% 61.1% 58.7% 50.8% 55.6%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 65.9% 70.9% 68.4% 68.7% 55.8% 62.3%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.7% 78.8% 77.8% 73.7% 71.6% 69.9%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 87.0% 88.2% 84.7% 88.0% 83.6% 85.7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Blank 37.1% 34.3% 33.1% 31.2% 26.8%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 34.9% 40.4% 31.4% 36.4% 28.9%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 51.4% 52.3% 51.0% 45.5% 43.2%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 68.2% 70.0% 65.6% 63.0% 66.7%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


20





by High School GPA (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

High School GPA Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Blank 2007 585 345 59.0% 217 37.1%

2008 592 360 60.8% 203 34.3%

2009 909 555 61.1% 301 33.1%

2010 983 577 58.7% 307 31.2%

2011 695 353 50.8% 186 26.8%

2012 473 263 55.6%

<= 1.00 2007


2008 2 2 100.0% 0.0%

2009 7 5 71.4% 2 28.6%

2010 3 3 100.0% 2 66.7%

2011 7 2 28.6% 1 14.3%

2012 10 5 50.0%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 2007 261 172 65.9% 91 34.9%

2008 344 244 70.9% 139 40.4%

2009 443 303 68.4% 139 31.4%

2010 467 321 68.7% 170 36.4%2010 467 321 68.7% 170 36.4%

2011 339 189 55.8% 98 28.9%

2012 374 233 62.3%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 2007 765 579 75.7% 393 51.4%

2008 803 633 78.8% 420 52.3%

2009 1,011 787 77.8% 516 51.0%

2010 1,061 782 73.7% 483 45.5%

2011 857 614 71.6% 370 43.2%

2012 935 654 69.9%

3 01 4 00 2007 409 356 87 0% 279 68 2%3.01 ‐ 4.00 2007 409 356 87.0% 279 68.2%

2008 373 329 88.2% 261 70.0%

2009 430 364 84.7% 282 65.6%

2010 416 366 88.0% 262 63.0%

2011 372 311 83.6% 248 66.7%

2012 349 299 85.7%

>= 4.00 2007

2008

2009

2010 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%

2011 4 4 100.0% 4 100.0%

2012 3 3 100.0%

21





by EFC Range (Toledo + Findlay Combined)by EFC Range (Toledo + Findlay Combined)

60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%

Fall‐to‐Spring Retention

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.9% 74.3% 72.1% 67.2% 60.6% 64.9%

501 ‐ 1900 81.4% 82.2% 78.7% 79.8% 68.4% 71.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 71.4% 81.6% 75.4% 79.7% 75.6% 71.2%

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.9% 74.3% 72.1% 67.2% 60.6% 64.9%

501 ‐ 1900 81.4% 82.2% 78.7% 79.8% 68.4% 71.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 71.4% 81.6% 75.4% 79.7% 75.6% 71.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 82.7% 78.9% 70.6% 80.0% 70.7% 72.9%

4401 ‐ 5273 77.8% 80.4% 84.2% 77.4% 63.8% 68.2%

5274 and Up 86.4% 85.5% 83.7% 79.2% 77.2% 76.8%

Blank 57.4% 56.8% 54.5% 52.2% 56.2% 60.6%

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


70%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.9% 74.3% 72.1% 67.2% 60.6% 64.9%

501 ‐ 1900 81.4% 82.2% 78.7% 79.8% 68.4% 71.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 71.4% 81.6% 75.4% 79.7% 75.6% 71.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 82.7% 78.9% 70.6% 80.0% 70.7% 72.9%

4401 ‐ 5273 77.8% 80.4% 84.2% 77.4% 63.8% 68.2%

5274 and Up 86.4% 85.5% 83.7% 79.2% 77.2% 76.8%

Blank 57.4% 56.8% 54.5% 52.2% 56.2% 60.6%

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%

Fall‐to‐Fall Retention

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.9% 74.3% 72.1% 67.2% 60.6% 64.9%

501 ‐ 1900 81.4% 82.2% 78.7% 79.8% 68.4% 71.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 71.4% 81.6% 75.4% 79.7% 75.6% 71.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 82.7% 78.9% 70.6% 80.0% 70.7% 72.9%

4401 ‐ 5273 77.8% 80.4% 84.2% 77.4% 63.8% 68.2%

5274 and Up 86.4% 85.5% 83.7% 79.2% 77.2% 76.8%

Blank 57.4% 56.8% 54.5% 52.2% 56.2% 60.6%

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 39.3% 42.7% 38.2% 34.9% 32.2%

501 ‐ 1900 53.4% 52.1% 46.1% 49.7% 44.4%

1901 ‐ 3400 48.2% 48.5% 43.8% 51.0% 51.3%

3401 ‐ 4400 51.9% 56.3% 48.2% 53.3% 60.3%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


NOTE: EFC is a financial aid term that refers to a students' Expected Family Contribution. It is an

estimate of students' ability to pay for college and is calculated based on information provided

th FAFSA St d t ith l EFC h hi h fi i l d d li ibl f

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.9% 74.3% 72.1% 67.2% 60.6% 64.9%

501 ‐ 1900 81.4% 82.2% 78.7% 79.8% 68.4% 71.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 71.4% 81.6% 75.4% 79.7% 75.6% 71.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 82.7% 78.9% 70.6% 80.0% 70.7% 72.9%

4401 ‐ 5273 77.8% 80.4% 84.2% 77.4% 63.8% 68.2%

5274 and Up 86.4% 85.5% 83.7% 79.2% 77.2% 76.8%

Blank 57.4% 56.8% 54.5% 52.2% 56.2% 60.6%

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 39.3% 42.7% 38.2% 34.9% 32.2%

501 ‐ 1900 53.4% 52.1% 46.1% 49.7% 44.4%

1901 ‐ 3400 48.2% 48.5% 43.8% 51.0% 51.3%

3401 ‐ 4400 51.9% 56.3% 48.2% 53.3% 60.3%

4401 ‐ 5273 50.0% 52.2% 59.6% 49.1% 57.4%

5274 and Up 63.3% 61.4% 58.3% 56.3% 55.6%

Blank 44.7% 41.1% 42.5% 43.5% 37.9%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


on the FAFSA. Students with lower EFC scores have higher financial need and are eligible for

larger Pell grant awards.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.9% 74.3% 72.1% 67.2% 60.6% 64.9%

501 ‐ 1900 81.4% 82.2% 78.7% 79.8% 68.4% 71.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 71.4% 81.6% 75.4% 79.7% 75.6% 71.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 82.7% 78.9% 70.6% 80.0% 70.7% 72.9%

4401 ‐ 5273 77.8% 80.4% 84.2% 77.4% 63.8% 68.2%

5274 and Up 86.4% 85.5% 83.7% 79.2% 77.2% 76.8%

Blank 57.4% 56.8% 54.5% 52.2% 56.2% 60.6%

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 39.3% 42.7% 38.2% 34.9% 32.2%

501 ‐ 1900 53.4% 52.1% 46.1% 49.7% 44.4%

1901 ‐ 3400 48.2% 48.5% 43.8% 51.0% 51.3%

3401 ‐ 4400 51.9% 56.3% 48.2% 53.3% 60.3%

4401 ‐ 5273 50.0% 52.2% 59.6% 49.1% 57.4%

5274 and Up 63.3% 61.4% 58.3% 56.3% 55.6%

Blank 44.7% 41.1% 42.5% 43.5% 37.9%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


22


by EFC Range (Toledo + Findlay Combined)




EFC Range Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

0 ‐ 500 2007 568 414 72.9% 223 39.3%

2008 723 537 74.3% 309 42.7%

2009 1,339 965 72.1% 511 38.2%

2010 1,719 1156 67.2% 600 34.9%

2011 1,306 792 60.6% 421 32.2%


,

2012 1,126 731 64.9%

501 ‐ 1900 2007 118 96 81.4% 63 53.4%

2008 163 134 82.2% 85 52.1%

2009 141 111 78.7% 65 46.1%

2010 173 138 79.8% 86 49.7%

2011 133 91 68.4% 59 44.4%

2012 125 89 71.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 2007 112 80 71.4% 54 48.2%1901 ‐ 3400 2007 112 80 71.4% 54 48.2%

2008 136 111 81.6% 66 48.5%

2009 130 98 75.4% 57 43.8%

2010 153 122 79.7% 78 51.0%

2011 119 90 75.6% 61 51.3%

2012 104 74 71.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 2007 52 43 82.7% 27 51.9%

2008 71 56 78.9% 40 56.3%

2009 85 60 70 6% 41 48 2%2009 85 60 70.6% 41 48.2%

2010 75 60 80.0% 40 53.3%

2011 58 41 70.7% 35 60.3%

2012 70 51 72.9%

4401 ‐ 5273 2007 54 42 77.8% 27 50.0%

2008 46 37 80.4% 24 52.2%

2009 57 48 84.2% 34 59.6%

2010 53 41 77.4% 26 49.1%

2011 47 30 63.8% 27 57.4%

2012 44 30 68.2%

5274 and Up 2007 471 407 86.4% 298 63.3%

2008 484 414 85.5% 297 61.4%

2009 551 461 83.7% 321 58.3%

2010 506 401 79.2% 285 56.3%

2011 408 315 77.2% 227 55.6%

2012 449 345 76.8%

Blank 2007 645 370 57.4% 288 44.7%

2008 491 279 56.8% 202 41.1%

2009 497 271 54.5% 211 42.5%

2010 255 133 52.2% 111 43.5%

2011 203 114 56.2% 77 37.9%

2012 226 137 60.6%


estimate of students' ability to pay for college and is calculated based on information providedestimate of students ability to pay for college and is calculated based on information provided



23

Toledo Campus

24





by Gender (Toledo Campus)

85%

90%

95%


60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.6% 75.7% 74.5% 74.6% 68.3% 73.5%

Male 67.2% 72.0% 68.2% 65.8% 61.9% 63.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.6% 75.7% 74.5% 74.6% 68.3% 73.5%

Male 67.2% 72.0% 68.2% 65.8% 61.9% 63.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


60%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.6% 75.7% 74.5% 74.6% 68.3% 73.5%

Male 67.2% 72.0% 68.2% 65.8% 61.9% 63.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


30%

40%

50%

60%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.6% 75.7% 74.5% 74.6% 68.3% 73.5%

Male 67.2% 72.0% 68.2% 65.8% 61.9% 63.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Female 49.7% 49.6% 47.5% 44.5% 42.4%

Male 43.4% 45.9% 39.3% 39.0% 35.5%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.6% 75.7% 74.5% 74.6% 68.3% 73.5%

Male 67.2% 72.0% 68.2% 65.8% 61.9% 63.2%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Female 49.7% 49.6% 47.5% 44.5% 42.4%

Male 43.4% 45.9% 39.3% 39.0% 35.5%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


25






Female 2007 875 653 74.6% 435 49.7%

2008 909 688 75.7% 451 49.6%

2009 1 156 861 74 5% 549 47 5%


by Gender (Toledo Campus)

2009 1,156 861 74.5% 549 47.5%

2010 1,193 890 74.6% 531 44.5%

2011 918 627 68.3% 389 42.4%

2012 893 656 73.5%

Male 2007 748 503 67.2% 325 43.4%

2008 775 558 72.0% 356 45.9%

2009 1,113 759 68.2% 437 39.3%2009 1,113 759 68.2% 437 39.3%

2010 1,180 776 65.8% 460 39.0%

2011 926 573 61.9% 329 35.5%

2012 917 580 63.2%

26





b E h i i (T l d C )by Ethnicity (Toledo Campus)

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201250%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 64.1% 65.0% 66.9% 59.5% 52.7% 58.1%

Hispanic 62.8% 70.4% 61.7% 65.2% 62.7% 61.5%

White 74.3% 78.0% 75.8% 75.7% 70.3% 73.2%

All Non‐White 64.3% 66.6% 65.1% 62.0% 56.9% 60.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 64.1% 65.0% 66.9% 59.5% 52.7% 58.1%

Hispanic 62.8% 70.4% 61.7% 65.2% 62.7% 61.5%

White 74.3% 78.0% 75.8% 75.7% 70.3% 73.2%

All Non‐White 64.3% 66.6% 65.1% 62.0% 56.9% 60.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 64.1% 65.0% 66.9% 59.5% 52.7% 58.1%

Hispanic 62.8% 70.4% 61.7% 65.2% 62.7% 61.5%

White 74.3% 78.0% 75.8% 75.7% 70.3% 73.2%

All Non‐White 64.3% 66.6% 65.1% 62.0% 56.9% 60.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 27 5% 32 6% 30 8% 27 3% 22 6%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 64.1% 65.0% 66.9% 59.5% 52.7% 58.1%

Hispanic 62.8% 70.4% 61.7% 65.2% 62.7% 61.5%

White 74.3% 78.0% 75.8% 75.7% 70.3% 73.2%

All Non‐White 64.3% 66.6% 65.1% 62.0% 56.9% 60.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 27.5% 32.6% 30.8% 27.3% 22.6%

Hispanic 42.3% 38.9% 32.8% 40.4% 27.8%

White 53.6% 54.8% 49.7% 48.8% 47.4%

All Non‐White 32.0% 35.0% 34.4% 31.3% 25.7%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


27





by Ethnicity (Toledo Campus)


American Indian 2007 9 3 33.3% 2 22.2%

2008 14 7 50.0% 3 21.4%

2009 7 5 71.4% 3 42.9%

2010 7 6 85.7% 2 28.6%

2011 12 11 91.7% 7 58.3%

2012 8 5 62.5%

Asian 2007 19 11 33.3% 5 26.3%


2008 16 12 50.0% 5 31.3%

2009 11 10 71.4% 9 81.8%

2010 17 14 82.4% 7 41.2%

2011 8 7 87.5% 5 62.5%

2012 9 5 55.6%

Black 2007 295 189 64.1% 81 27.5%

2008 334 217 65.0% 109 32.6%

2009 493 330 66.9% 152 30.8%

2010 622 370 59.5% 170 27.3%2010 622 370 59.5% 170 27.3%

2011 442 233 52.7% 100 22.6%

2012 434 252 58.1%

Hispanic 2007 78 49 62.8% 33 42.3%

2008 108 76 70.4% 42 38.9%

2009 128 79 61.7% 42 32.8%

2010 198 129 65.2% 80 40.4%

2011 158 99 62.7% 44 27.8%

2012 143 88 61.5%

Pacific Islander 2007 2 1 50 0% 1 50 0%Pacific Islander 2007 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%

2008 5 0.0% 0.0%

2009 1 1 100.0% 0.0%

2010 1 0.0% 0.0%

2011 1 0.0% 0.0%

2012

White 2007 1,111 826 74.3% 596 53.6%

2008 1,098 856 78.0% 602 54.8%

2009 1,342 1,017 75.8% 667 49.7%

2010 1,421 1,076 75.7% 693 48.8%

2011 1,124 790 70.3% 533 47.4%

2012 1,095 801 73.2%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 73 50 68.5% 26 35.6%

2011 68 42 61.8% 21 30.9%

2012 57 38 66.7%


Unknown 2007 110 77 70.0% 42 38.2%

2008 109 78 71.6% 46 42.2%

2009 288 179 62.2% 113 39.2%

2010 35 22 62.9% 13 37.1%

2011 31 18 58.1% 8 25.8%

2012 64 47 73.4%

All Non‐White 2007 513 330 64.3% 164 32.0%

2008 586 390 66.6% 205 35.0%

2009 928 604 65.1% 319 34.4%2009 928 604 65.1% 319 34.4%

2010 953 591 62.0% 298 31.3%

2011 720 410 56.9% 185 25.7%

2012 715 435 60.8%


28





by Gender & Ethnicity (Toledo Campus)

80%85%90%95%100%


55%60%65%70%


40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.8% 68.0% 71.3% 63.0% 55.5% 69.0%

Hispanic 70.6% 70.5% 53.0% 65.1% 64.0% 69.7%

White 76.9% 79.6% 79.1% 81.6% 74.9% 76.1%

All Non‐White 70.2% 68.8% 67.4% 64.5% 58.6% 69.3%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 33.1% 35.6% 36.0% 31.0% 23.9%

Hispanic 45.1% 47.5% 30.3% 43.4% 27.9%

White 56.0% 56.1% 54.4% 50.8% 53.5%

All Non‐White 37.3% 38.2% 37.0% 35.3% 26.1%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.8% 68.0% 71.3% 63.0% 55.5% 69.0%

Hispanic 70.6% 70.5% 53.0% 65.1% 64.0% 69.7%

White 76.9% 79.6% 79.1% 81.6% 74.9% 76.1%

All Non‐White 70.2% 68.8% 67.4% 64.5% 58.6% 69.3%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 33.1% 35.6% 36.0% 31.0% 23.9%

Hispanic 45.1% 47.5% 30.3% 43.4% 27.9%

White 56.0% 56.1% 54.4% 50.8% 53.5%

All Non‐White 37.3% 38.2% 37.0% 35.3% 26.1%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.8% 68.0% 71.3% 63.0% 55.5% 69.0%

Hispanic 70.6% 70.5% 53.0% 65.1% 64.0% 69.7%

White 76.9% 79.6% 79.1% 81.6% 74.9% 76.1%

All Non‐White 70.2% 68.8% 67.4% 64.5% 58.6% 69.3%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 56.8% 60.7% 62.1% 55.9% 49.5% 47.5%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 33.1% 35.6% 36.0% 31.0% 23.9%

Hispanic 45.1% 47.5% 30.3% 43.4% 27.9%

White 56.0% 56.1% 54.4% 50.8% 53.5%

All Non‐White 37.3% 38.2% 37.0% 35.3% 26.1%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 20.0% 28.6% 25.1% 23.5% 21.1%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 69.8% 68.0% 71.3% 63.0% 55.5% 69.0%

Hispanic 70.6% 70.5% 53.0% 65.1% 64.0% 69.7%

White 76.9% 79.6% 79.1% 81.6% 74.9% 76.1%

All Non‐White 70.2% 68.8% 67.4% 64.5% 58.6% 69.3%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 56.8% 60.7% 62.1% 55.9% 49.5% 47.5%

Hispanic 48.1% 70.2% 71.0% 65.2% 61.1% 52.2%

White 71.6% 76.1% 72.2% 69.9% 65.9% 70.2%

All Non‐White 56.7% 63.7% 62.8% 59.4% 55.2% 53.0%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 33.1% 35.6% 36.0% 31.0% 23.9%

Hispanic 45.1% 47.5% 30.3% 43.4% 27.9%

White 56.0% 56.1% 54.4% 50.8% 53.5%

All Non‐White 37.3% 38.2% 37.0% 35.3% 26.1%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 20.0% 28.6% 25.1% 23.5% 21.1%

Hispanic 37.0% 27.7% 35.5% 37.0% 27.8%

White 51.0% 53.4% 44.6% 46.7% 41.7%

All Non‐White 24.9% 30.9% 31.9% 27.1% 25.3%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


29







Female American Indian 2007 2 0.0% 0.0%

2008 8 3 37.5% 1 12.5%

2009 4 3 75.0% 2 50.0%

2010 2 2 100.0% 1 50.0%

2011 4 4 100.0% 3 75.0%

2012 5 3 60.0%

Asian 2007 14 10 71.4% 4 28.6%

2008 14 12 85 7% 5 35 7%


2008 14 12 85.7% 5 35.7%

2009 4 4 100.0% 3 75.0%

2010 8 7 87.5% 3 37.5%

2011 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0%

2012 2 2 100.0%

Black 2007 169 118 69.8% 56 33.1%

2008 194 132 68.0% 69 35.6%

2009 258 184 71.3% 93 36.0%

2010 316 199 63.0% 98 31.0%

2011 238 132 55 5% 57 23 9%2011 238 132 55.5% 57 23.9%

2012 213 147 69.0%

Hispanic 2007 51 36 70.6% 23 45.1%

2008 61 43 70.5% 29 47.5%

2009 66 35 53.0% 20 30.3%

2010 106 69 65.1% 46 43.4%

2011 86 55 64.0% 24 27.9%

2012 76 53 69.7%


2008 5 0 0% 0 0%2008 5 0.0% 0.0%

2009

2010

2011 1 0.0% 0.0%

2012

White 2007 580 446 76.9% 325 56.0%

2008 579 461 79.6% 325 56.1%

2009 699 553 79.1% 380 54.4%

2010 706 576 81.6% 359 50.8%

2011 546 409 74 9% 292 53 5%2011 546 409 74.9% 292 53.5%

2012 548 417 76.1%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 41 30 73.2% 19 46.3%

2011 37 22 59.5% 10 27.0%

2012 27 17 63.0%

Unknown 2007 57 42 73.7% 26 45.6%

2008 48 37 77 1% 22 45 8%


2008 48 37 77.1% 22 45.8%

2009 125 82 65.6% 51 40.8%

2010 14 7 50.0% 5 35.7%

2011 5 4 80.0% 2 40.0%

2012 22 17 77.3%

All Non‐White 2007 295 207 70.2% 110 37.3%

2008 330 227 68.8% 126 38.2%

2009 457 308 67.4% 169 37.0%

2010 487 314 64.5% 172 35.3%

2011 372 218 58 6% 97 26 1%2011 372 218 58.6% 97 26.1%

2012 345 239 69.3%

30








Male American Indian 2007 7 3 42.9% 2 28.6%

2008 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%

2009 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%

2010 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%

2011 8 7 87.5% 4 50.0%

2012 3 2 66.7%

Asian 2007 5 1 20.0% 1 20.0%

2008 2 0 0% 0 0%2008 2 0.0% 0.0%

2009 7 6 85.7% 6 85.7%

2010 9 7 77.8% 4 44.4%

2011 7 6 85.7% 4 57.1%

2012 7 3 42.9%

Black 2007 125 71 56.8% 25 20.0%

2008 140 85 60.7% 40 28.6%

2009 235 146 62.1% 59 25.1%

2010 306 171 55.9% 72 23.5%

2011 204 101 49 5% 43 21 1%2011 204 101 49.5% 43 21.1%

2012 221 105 47.5%

Hispanic 2007 27 13 48.1% 10 37.0%

2008 47 33 70.2% 13 27.7%

2009 62 44 71.0% 22 35.5%

2010 92 60 65.2% 34 37.0%

2011 72 44 61.1% 20 27.8%

2012 67 35 52.2%


20082008

2009 1 1 100.0% 0.0%

2010 1 0.0% 0.0%

2011

2012

White 2007 531 380 71.6% 271 51.0%

2008 519 395 76.1% 277 53.4%

2009 643 464 72.2% 287 44.6%

2010 715 500 69.9% 334 46.7%

2011 578 381 65 9% 241 41 7%2011 578 381 65.9% 241 41.7%

2012 547 384 70.2%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 32 20 62.5% 7 21.9%

2011 31 20 64.5% 11 35.5%

2012 30 21 70.0%

Unknown 2007 53 35 66.0% 16 30.2%

2008 61 41 67 2% 24 39 3%


2008 61 41 67.2% 24 39.3%

2009 162 96 59.3% 62 38.3%

2010 20 14 70.0% 8 40.0%

2011 26 14 53.8% 6 23.1%

2012 42 30 71.4%

All Non‐White 2007 217 123 56.7% 54 24.9%

2008 256 163 63.7% 79 30.9%

2009 470 295 62.8% 150 31.9%

2010 465 276 59.4% 126 27.1%

2011 348 192 55 2% 88 25 3%2011 348 192 55.2% 88 25.3%

2012 370 196 53.0% 0 0.0%


31





b A (T l d C )by Age (Toledo Campus)

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 77 6% 78 2% 78 0% 84 0% 63 4% 78 7%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 77.6% 78.2% 78.0% 84.0% 63.4% 78.7%

18 78.9% 78.4% 79.5% 78.6% 74.2% 73.0%

19 70.5% 70.8% 68.7% 67.7% 64.9% 65.8%

20 ‐ 25 65.0% 68.9% 68.5% 61.9% 53.0% 63.2%

Above 25 63.9% 73.0% 65.6% 68.4% 63.4% 67.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 77.6% 78.2% 78.0% 84.0% 63.4% 78.7%

18 78.9% 78.4% 79.5% 78.6% 74.2% 73.0%

19 70.5% 70.8% 68.7% 67.7% 64.9% 65.8%

20 ‐ 25 65.0% 68.9% 68.5% 61.9% 53.0% 63.2%

Above 25 63.9% 73.0% 65.6% 68.4% 63.4% 67.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 77.6% 78.2% 78.0% 84.0% 63.4% 78.7%

18 78.9% 78.4% 79.5% 78.6% 74.2% 73.0%

19 70.5% 70.8% 68.7% 67.7% 64.9% 65.8%

20 ‐ 25 65.0% 68.9% 68.5% 61.9% 53.0% 63.2%

Above 25 63.9% 73.0% 65.6% 68.4% 63.4% 67.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Less than 18 55.1% 50.9% 50.8% 62.0% 39.0%

18 55 3% 55 9% 53 4% 49 1% 48 9%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 77.6% 78.2% 78.0% 84.0% 63.4% 78.7%

18 78.9% 78.4% 79.5% 78.6% 74.2% 73.0%

19 70.5% 70.8% 68.7% 67.7% 64.9% 65.8%

20 ‐ 25 65.0% 68.9% 68.5% 61.9% 53.0% 63.2%

Above 25 63.9% 73.0% 65.6% 68.4% 63.4% 67.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Less than 18 55.1% 50.9% 50.8% 62.0% 39.0%

18 55.3% 55.9% 53.4% 49.1% 48.9%

19 46.5% 44.1% 43.3% 38.1% 36.8%

20 ‐ 25 37.2% 37.2% 34.9% 31.7% 27.8%

Above 25 41.0% 46.9% 39.3% 42.8% 36.3%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


32






Less than 18 2007 49 38 77.6% 27 55.1%

2008 55 43 78.2% 28 50.9%

2009 59 46 78 0% 30 50 8%


by Age (Toledo Campus)

2009 59 46 78.0% 30 50.8%

2010 50 42 84.0% 31 62.0%

2011 41 26 63.4% 16 39.0%

2012 47 37 78.7%

18 2007 606 478 78.9% 335 55.3%

2008 658 516 78.4% 368 55.9%

2009 698 555 79.5% 373 53.4%2009 698 555 79.5% 373 53.4%

2010 751 590 78.6% 369 49.1%

2011 656 487 74.2% 321 48.9%

2012 641 468 73.0%

19 2007 254 179 70.5% 118 46.5%

2008 281 199 70.8% 124 44.1%

2009 342 235 68.7% 148 43.3%

20 0 362 2 6 % 38 38 %2010 362 245 67.7% 138 38.1%

2011 302 196 64.9% 111 36.8%

2012 304 200 65.8%

20 ‐ 25 2007 349 227 65.0% 130 37.2%

2008 379 261 68.9% 141 37.2%

2009 578 396 68.5% 202 34.9%

2010 590 365 61.9% 187 31.7%2010 590 365 61.9% 187 31.7%

2011 432 229 53.0% 120 27.8%

2012 465 294 63.2%

Above 25 2007 366 234 63.9% 150 41.0%

2008 311 227 73.0% 146 46.9%

2009 593 389 65.6% 233 39.3%

2010 621 425 68.4% 266 42.8%

2011 413 262 63.4% 150 36.3%

2012 353 237 67.1%

33





/by Full‐Time/Part‐Time Status (Toledo Campus)

85%

90%

95%


60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 79.2% 80.3% 77.9% 75.7% 70.2% 73.2%

Part‐Time 57.2% 62.0% 58.5% 57.6% 55.1% 60.4%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


70%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 79.2% 80.3% 77.9% 75.7% 70.2% 73.2%

Part‐Time 57.2% 62.0% 58.5% 57.6% 55.1% 60.4%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 79.2% 80.3% 77.9% 75.7% 70.2% 73.2%

Part‐Time 57.2% 62.0% 58.5% 57.6% 55.1% 60.4%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 201120%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 79.2% 80.3% 77.9% 75.7% 70.2% 73.2%

Part‐Time 57.2% 62.0% 58.5% 57.6% 55.1% 60.4%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Full‐Time 51.2% 54.4% 47.0% 43.8% 42.8%

Part‐Time 39.1% 35.6% 36.2% 37.1% 31.5%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


NOTE: Full time includes students attempting 12 credit hours or more; part time includes


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 79.2% 80.3% 77.9% 75.7% 70.2% 73.2%

Part‐Time 57.2% 62.0% 58.5% 57.6% 55.1% 60.4%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Full‐Time 51.2% 54.4% 47.0% 43.8% 42.8%

Part‐Time 39.1% 35.6% 36.2% 37.1% 31.5%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


34





/

Status Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Full‐Time 2007 1,031 817 79.2% 528 51.2%

2008 1,105 887 80.3% 601 54.4%

2009 1 514 1 179 77 9% 712 47 0%


by Full‐Time/Part‐Time Status (Toledo Campus)

2009 1,514 1,179 77.9% 712 47.0%

2010 1,652 1,251 75.7% 723 43.8%

2011 1,218 855 70.2% 521 42.8%

2012 1,118 818 73.2%

Part‐Time 2007 593 339 57.2% 232 39.1%

2008 579 359 62.0% 206 35.6%

2009 756 442 58.5% 274 36.2%2009 756 442 58.5% 274 36.2%

2010 722 416 57.6% 268 37.1%

2011 626 345 55.1% 197 31.5%

2012 692 418 60.4%



35





by High School GPA (Toledo Campus)

High School GPA


70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Bl k

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.2% 61.2% 60.8% 58.9% 50.7% 56.3%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 66.4% 70.9% 68.6% 69.7% 55.6% 64.5%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.2% 79.7% 77.4% 74.0% 73.2% 69.3%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 86.6% 86.8% 85.0% 88.3% 83.3% 87.3%

All Students <= 2.04 67.1% 72.4% 69.4% 69.4% 56.1% 65.3%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.2% 61.2% 60.8% 58.9% 50.7% 56.3%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 66.4% 70.9% 68.6% 69.7% 55.6% 64.5%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.2% 79.7% 77.4% 74.0% 73.2% 69.3%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 86.6% 86.8% 85.0% 88.3% 83.3% 87.3%

All Students <= 2.04 67.1% 72.4% 69.4% 69.4% 56.1% 65.3%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.2% 61.2% 60.8% 58.9% 50.7% 56.3%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 66.4% 70.9% 68.6% 69.7% 55.6% 64.5%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.2% 79.7% 77.4% 74.0% 73.2% 69.3%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 86.6% 86.8% 85.0% 88.3% 83.3% 87.3%

All Students <= 2.04 67.1% 72.4% 69.4% 69.4% 56.1% 65.3%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Blank 37.0% 34.9% 32.4% 30.6% 26.4%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 59.2% 61.2% 60.8% 58.9% 50.7% 56.3%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 66.4% 70.9% 68.6% 69.7% 55.6% 64.5%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 75.2% 79.7% 77.4% 74.0% 73.2% 69.3%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 86.6% 86.8% 85.0% 88.3% 83.3% 87.3%

All Students <= 2.04 67.1% 72.4% 69.4% 69.4% 56.1% 65.3%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Blank 37.0% 34.9% 32.4% 30.6% 26.4%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 33.2% 38.9% 31.4% 36.8% 27.4%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 49.7% 53.8% 51.2% 45.8% 43.7%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 67.2% 67.5% 65.1% 63.8% 63.8%

All Students <= 2.04 35.0% 38.8% 32.1% 37.9% 28.8%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


36







Blank 2007 500 296 59.2% 185 37.0%

2008 487 298 61.2% 170 34.9%

2009 762 463 60.8% 247 32.4%

2010 781 460 58.9% 239 30.6%

2011 560 284 50.7% 148 26.4%

2012 400 225 56.3%

<= 1.00 2007


2008 2 2 100.0% 0.0%

2009 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%

2010 3 3 100.0% 2 66.7%

2011 6 2 33.3% 1 16.7%

2012 10 5 50.0%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 2007 217 144 66.4% 72 33.2%

2008 285 202 70.9% 111 38.9%

2009 385 264 68.6% 121 31.4%

2010 389 271 69.7% 143 36.8%2010 389 271 69.7% 143 36.8%

2011 288 160 55.6% 79 27.4%

2012 335 216 64.5%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 2007 608 457 75.2% 302 49.7%

2008 645 514 79.7% 347 53.8%

2009 797 617 77.4% 408 51.2%

2010 882 653 74.0% 404 45.8%

2011 710 520 73.2% 310 43.7%

2012 779 540 69.3%

3 01 4 00 2007 299 259 86 6% 201 67 2%3.01 ‐ 4.00 2007 299 259 86.6% 201 67.2%

2008 265 230 86.8% 179 67.5%

2009 321 273 85.0% 209 65.1%

2010 315 278 88.3% 201 63.8%

2011 276 230 83.3% 176 63.8%

2012 284 248 87.3%

>= 4.00 2007

2008

2009

2010 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%

2011 4 4 100.0% 4 100.0%

2012 2 2 100.0%

All Students <= 2.04 2007 237 159 67.1% 83 35.0%

2008 312 226 72.4% 121 38.8%

2009 418 290 69.4% 134 32.1%

2010 435 302 69.4% 165 37.9%

2011 326 183 56.1% 94 28.8%

2012 380 248 65.3%

37





by EFC Range (Toledo Campus)by EFC Range (Toledo Campus)

65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100% Fall‐to‐Spring Retention

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.7% 73.9% 71.9% 67.9% 61.6% 65.8%

501 ‐ 1900 77.3% 82.7% 81.9% 82.2% 68.3% 72.5%

1901 3400 69 9% 81 3% 74 7% 80 7% 74 7% 68 8%

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100% Fall‐to‐Spring Retention

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.7% 73.9% 71.9% 67.9% 61.6% 65.8%

501 ‐ 1900 77.3% 82.7% 81.9% 82.2% 68.3% 72.5%

1901 ‐ 3400 69.9% 81.3% 74.7% 80.7% 74.7% 68.8%

3401 ‐ 4400 83.7% 82.1% 68.7% 75.5% 67.4% 75.0%

4401 ‐ 5273 78.7% 78.8% 81.0% 73.7% 60.0% 65.8%

5274 and Up 85.5% 85.8% 83.3% 79.8% 77.5% 77.5%

Blank 57.9% 57.3% 54.0% 51.9% 56.0% 59.8%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.7% 73.9% 71.9% 67.9% 61.6% 65.8%

501 ‐ 1900 77.3% 82.7% 81.9% 82.2% 68.3% 72.5%

1901 ‐ 3400 69.9% 81.3% 74.7% 80.7% 74.7% 68.8%

3401 ‐ 4400 83.7% 82.1% 68.7% 75.5% 67.4% 75.0%

4401 ‐ 5273 78.7% 78.8% 81.0% 73.7% 60.0% 65.8%

5274 and Up 85.5% 85.8% 83.3% 79.8% 77.5% 77.5%

Blank 57.9% 57.3% 54.0% 51.9% 56.0% 59.8%


25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.7% 73.9% 71.9% 67.9% 61.6% 65.8%

501 ‐ 1900 77.3% 82.7% 81.9% 82.2% 68.3% 72.5%

1901 ‐ 3400 69.9% 81.3% 74.7% 80.7% 74.7% 68.8%

3401 ‐ 4400 83.7% 82.1% 68.7% 75.5% 67.4% 75.0%

4401 ‐ 5273 78.7% 78.8% 81.0% 73.7% 60.0% 65.8%

5274 and Up 85.5% 85.8% 83.3% 79.8% 77.5% 77.5%

Blank 57.9% 57.3% 54.0% 51.9% 56.0% 59.8%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 37.9% 41.2% 37.2% 35.3% 31.8%

501 ‐ 1900 44.3% 51.2% 46.7% 54.1% 43.3%

1901 ‐ 3400 44.6% 47.7% 42.1% 50.4% 52.9%

3401 ‐ 4400 48 8% 60 7% 46 3% 49 1% 58 1%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%




th FAFSA St d t ith l EFC h hi h fi i l d d li ibl f

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.7% 73.9% 71.9% 67.9% 61.6% 65.8%

501 ‐ 1900 77.3% 82.7% 81.9% 82.2% 68.3% 72.5%

1901 ‐ 3400 69.9% 81.3% 74.7% 80.7% 74.7% 68.8%

3401 ‐ 4400 83.7% 82.1% 68.7% 75.5% 67.4% 75.0%

4401 ‐ 5273 78.7% 78.8% 81.0% 73.7% 60.0% 65.8%

5274 and Up 85.5% 85.8% 83.3% 79.8% 77.5% 77.5%

Blank 57.9% 57.3% 54.0% 51.9% 56.0% 59.8%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 37.9% 41.2% 37.2% 35.3% 31.8%

501 ‐ 1900 44.3% 51.2% 46.7% 54.1% 43.3%

1901 ‐ 3400 44.6% 47.7% 42.1% 50.4% 52.9%

3401 ‐ 4400 48.8% 60.7% 46.3% 49.1% 58.1%

4401 ‐ 5273 53.2% 51.5% 54.8% 42.1% 52.5%

5274 and Up 60.8% 60.7% 55.9% 56.5% 53.2%

Blank 44.9% 42.5% 44.4% 40.7% 38.1%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%




2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 72.7% 73.9% 71.9% 67.9% 61.6% 65.8%

501 ‐ 1900 77.3% 82.7% 81.9% 82.2% 68.3% 72.5%

1901 ‐ 3400 69.9% 81.3% 74.7% 80.7% 74.7% 68.8%

3401 ‐ 4400 83.7% 82.1% 68.7% 75.5% 67.4% 75.0%

4401 ‐ 5273 78.7% 78.8% 81.0% 73.7% 60.0% 65.8%

5274 and Up 85.5% 85.8% 83.3% 79.8% 77.5% 77.5%

Blank 57.9% 57.3% 54.0% 51.9% 56.0% 59.8%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 37.9% 41.2% 37.2% 35.3% 31.8%

501 ‐ 1900 44.3% 51.2% 46.7% 54.1% 43.3%

1901 ‐ 3400 44.6% 47.7% 42.1% 50.4% 52.9%

3401 ‐ 4400 48.8% 60.7% 46.3% 49.1% 58.1%

4401 ‐ 5273 53.2% 51.5% 54.8% 42.1% 52.5%

5274 and Up 60.8% 60.7% 55.9% 56.5% 53.2%

Blank 44.9% 42.5% 44.4% 40.7% 38.1%

20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%


38





by EFC Range (Toledo Campus)


0 ‐ 500 2007 454 330 72.7% 172 37.9%

2008 570 421 73.9% 235 41.2%

2009 1,091 784 71.9% 406 37.2%

2010 1,397 948 67.9% 493 35.3%

2011 1,069 659 61.6% 340 31.8%


,

2012 965 635 65.8%

501 ‐ 1900 2007 88 68 77.3% 39 44.3%

2008 127 105 82.7% 65 51.2%

2009 105 86 81.9% 49 46.7%

2010 135 111 82.2% 73 54.1%

2011 104 71 68.3% 45 43.3%

2012 102 74 72.5%

1901 ‐ 3400 2007 83 58 69.9% 37 44.6%1901 ‐ 3400 2007 83 58 69.9% 37 44.6%

2008 107 87 81.3% 51 47.7%

2009 95 71 74.7% 40 42.1%

2010 119 96 80.7% 60 50.4%

2011 87 65 74.7% 46 52.9%

2012 80 55 68.8%

3401 ‐ 4400 2007 43 36 83.7% 21 48.8%

2008 56 46 82.1% 34 60.7%

2009 67 46 68 7% 31 46 3%2009 67 46 68.7% 31 46.3%

2010 53 40 75.5% 26 49.1%

2011 43 29 67.4% 25 58.1%

2012 52 39 75.0%

4401 ‐ 5273 2007 47 37 78.7% 25 53.2%

2008 33 26 78.8% 17 51.5%

2009 42 34 81.0% 23 54.8%

2010 38 28 73.7% 16 42.1%

2011 40 24 60.0% 21 52.5%

2012 38 25 65.8%

5274 and Up 2007 365 312 85.5% 222 60.8%

2008 379 325 85.8% 230 60.7%

2009 444 370 83.3% 248 55.9%

2010 416 332 79.8% 235 56.5%

2011 333 258 77.5% 177 53.2%

2012 369 286 77.5%

Blank 2007 544 315 57.9% 244 44.9%

2008 412 236 57.3% 175 42.5%

2009 426 230 54.0% 189 44.4%

2010 216 112 51.9% 88 40.7%

2011 168 94 56.0% 64 38.1%

2012 204 122 59.8%


estimate of students' ability to pay for college and is calculated based on information providedestimate of students ability to pay for college and is calculated based on information provided



39





by City of Residence (Toledo Campus)

85%

90%

95%


60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Toledo 67.7% 69.7% 70.1% 64.5% 59.5% 63.9%

All Other Cities 74.0% 77.9% 72.7% 77.1% 70.8% 73.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


70%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Toledo 67.7% 69.7% 70.1% 64.5% 59.5% 63.9%

All Other Cities 74.0% 77.9% 72.7% 77.1% 70.8% 73.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Toledo 67.7% 69.7% 70.1% 64.5% 59.5% 63.9%

All Other Cities 74.0% 77.9% 72.7% 77.1% 70.8% 73.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Toledo 67.7% 69.7% 70.1% 64.5% 59.5% 63.9%

All Other Cities 74.0% 77.9% 72.7% 77.1% 70.8% 73.1%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Toledo 38.4% 42.2% 38.9% 35.8% 31.1%

All Other Cities 53.4% 53.2% 48.1% 48.8% 47.0%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


40





City of Residence Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Bowling Green 2007 51 37 72.5% 26 51.0%

2008 46 32 69.6% 20 43.5%



2009 67 54 80.6% 35 52.2%

2010 68 59 86.8% 40 58.8%

2011 54 37 68.5% 23 42.6%

2012 31 21 67.7%

Cleveland 2007 8 1 12.5% 1 12.5%

2008 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%

2009 25 3 12 0% 0 0%2009 25 3 12.0% 0.0%

2010 20 9 45.0% 1 5.0%

2011 12 1 8.3% 0 0.0%

2012 13 4 30.8%

Curtice 2007 18 14 77.8% 10 55.6%

2008 13 10 76.9% 8 61.5%

2009 17 12 70.6% 8 47.1%2009 17 12 70.6% 8 47.1%

2010 18 12 66.7% 8 44.4%

2011 13 10 76.9% 5 38.5%

2012 8 8 100.0%

Defiance 2007 14 13 92.9% 7 50.0%

2008 6 5 83.3% 1 16.7%

2009 6 4 66.7% 1 16.7%

2010 10 8 80 0% 1 10 0%2010 10 8 80.0% 1 10.0%

2011 10 9 90.0% 5 50.0%

2012 5 2 40.0%

Delta 2007 6 2 33.3% 1 16.7%

2008 12 9 75.0% 8 66.7%

2009 14 8 57.1% 7 50.0%

2010 6 6 100.0% 5 83.3%2010 6 6 100.0% 5 83.3%

2011 14 12 85.7% 7 50.0%

2012 11 6 54.5%

Findlay 2007 6 6 100.0% 4 66.7%

2008 9 8 88.9% 4 44.4%

2009 17 15 88.2% 10 58.8%

2010 15 11 73.3% 9 60.0%

2011 6 3 50.0% 1 16.7%

2012 3 3 100.0%

41








Fostoria 2007 6 5 83.3% 5 83.3%

2008 5 5 100.0% 4 80.0%

2009 12 8 66.7% 5 41.7%

2010 12 6 50.0% 4 33.3%

2011 8 6 75.0% 3 37.5%

2012 1 1 100.0%

Fremont 2007 12 9 75.0% 6 50.0%

2008 13 9 69.2% 7 53.8%

2009 19 18 94 7% 10 52 6%2009 19 18 94.7% 10 52.6%

2010 10 5 50.0% 5 50.0%

2011 5 5 100.0% 3 60.0%

2012 9 7 77.8%

Genoa 2007 13 8 61.5% 8 61.5%

2008 17 12 70.6% 9 52.9%

2009 17 12 70.6% 8 47.1%2009 17 12 70.6% 8 47.1%

2010 16 13 81.3% 9 56.3%

2011 12 10 83.3% 6 50.0%

2012 16 12 75.0%

Gibsonburg 2007 10 8 80.0% 4 40.0%

2008 7 5 71.4% 3 42.9%

2009 12 8 66.7% 3 25.0%

2010 4 2 50 0% 0 0%2010 4 2 50.0% 0.0%

2011 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%

2012 3 3 100.0%

Grand Rapids 2007 8 4 50.0% 3 37.5%

2008 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%

2009 4 3 75.0% 1 25.0%

2010 7 5 71.4% 4 57.1%2010 7 5 71.4% 4 57.1%

2011 14 8 57.1% 7 50.0%

2012 6 5 83.3%

Holland 2007 32 24 75.0% 17 53.1%

2008 36 30 83.3% 17 47.2%

2009 40 32 80.0% 21 52.5%

2010 44 32 72.7% 19 43.2%

2011 39 24 61.5% 14 35.9%

2012 40 23 57.5%

42








Lambertville 2007 7 3 42.9% 4 57.1%

2008 4 3 75.0% 3 75.0%

2009 4 3 75.0% 2 50.0%

2010 5 4 80.0% 3 60.0%

2011 10 7 70.0% 5 50.0%

2012 4 3 75.0%

Liberty Center 2007 14 10 71.4% 10 71.4%

2008 7 6 85.7% 2 28.6%

2009 8 5 62 5% 3 37 5%2009 8 5 62.5% 3 37.5%

2010 5 4 80.0% 4 80.0%

2011 7 6 85.7% 2 28.6%

2012 7 6 85.7%

Maumee 2007 55 41 74.5% 28 50.9%

2008 58 44 75.9% 29 50.0%

2009 81 57 70.4% 42 51.9%2009 81 57 70.4% 42 51.9%

2010 76 50 65.8% 32 42.1%

2011 47 39 83.0% 24 51.1%

2012 62 45 72.6%

Millbury 2007 4 3 75.0% 3 75.0%

2008 16 13 81.3% 4 25.0%

2009 14 14 100.0% 8 57.1%

2010 9 8 88 9% 3 33 3%2010 9 8 88.9% 3 33.3%

2011 8 5 62.5% 5 62.5%

2012 13 13 100.0%

Monclova 2007 10 6 60.0% 6 60.0%

2008 14 10 71.4% 7 50.0%

2009 11 9 81.8% 9 81.8%

2010 7 7 100.0% 3 42.9%2010 7 7 100.0% 3 42.9%

2011 12 8 66.7% 3 25.0%

2012

Napoleon 2007 9 7 77.8% 7 77.8%

2008 11 8 72.7% 6 54.5%

2009 14 10 71.4% 7 50.0%

2010 10 9 90.0% 4 40.0%

2011 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%

2012 5 4 80.0%

43








Northwood 2007 26 22 84.6% 19 73.1%

2008 26 22 84.6% 17 65.4%

2009 26 20 76.9% 19 73.1%

2010 33 25 75.8% 18 54.5%

2011 29 22 75.9% 16 55.2%

2012 34 27 79.4%

Oak Harbor 2007 9 8 88.9% 6 66.7%

2008 8 6 75.0% 4 50.0%

2009 10 7 70 0% 5 50 0%2009 10 7 70.0% 5 50.0%

2010 10 9 90.0% 7 70.0%

2011 13 11 84.6% 9 69.2%

2012 16 12 75.0%

Oregon 2007 64 49 76.6% 31 48.4%

2008 51 46 90.2% 32 62.7%

2009 71 48 67.6% 31 43.7%2009 71 48 67.6% 31 43.7%

2010 76 53 69.7% 38 50.0%

2011 64 41 64.1% 28 43.8%

2012 49 33 67.3%

Pemberville 2007 9 7 77.8% 5 55.6%

2008 9 7 77.8% 4 44.4%

2009 14 12 85.7% 5 35.7%

2010 11 7 63 6% 7 63 6%2010 11 7 63.6% 7 63.6%

2011 10 8 80.0% 5 50.0%

2012 12 9 75.0%

Perrysburg 2007 68 45 66.2% 28 41.2%

2008 68 55 80.9% 37 54.4%

2009 115 91 79.1% 54 47.0%

2010 93 71 76.3% 42 45.2%2010 93 71 76.3% 42 45.2%

2011 103 73 70.9% 46 44.7%

2012 80 57 71.3%

Rossford 2007 22 12 54.5% 11 50.0%

2008 23 18 78.3% 12 52.2%

2009 23 16 69.6% 10 43.5%

2010 39 30 76.9% 18 46.2%

2011 21 15 71.4% 9 42.9%

2012 21 16 76.2%

44








Sandusky 2007 3 1 33.3% 0.0%

2008 5 3 60.0% 2 40.0%

2009 7 6 85.7% 3 42.9%

2010 10 7 70.0% 4 40.0%

2011 4 3 75.0% 1 25.0%

2012 4 4 100.0%

Swanton 2007 34 26 76.5% 17 50.0%

2008 25 22 88.0% 15 60.0%

2009 38 27 71 1% 14 36 8%2009 38 27 71.1% 14 36.8%

2010 31 27 87.1% 17 54.8%

2011 20 14 70.0% 9 45.0%

2012 27 17 63.0%

Sylvania 2007 39 28 71.8% 23 59.0%

2008 48 35 72.9% 25 52.1%

2009 60 42 70.0% 27 45.0%2009 60 42 70.0% 27 45.0%

2010 67 57 85.1% 40 59.7%

2011 47 38 80.9% 26 55.3%

2012 58 37 63.8%

Temperance 2007 6 4 66.7% 3 50.0%

2008 9 8 88.9% 5 55.6%

2009 14 5 35.7% 6 42.9%

2010 13 10 76 9% 5 38 5%2010 13 10 76.9% 5 38.5%

2011 6 3 50.0% 1 16.7%

2012 17 12 70.6%

Tiffin 2007 7 5 71.4% 3 42.9%

2008 10 6 60.0% 5 50.0%

2009 3 3 100.0% 3 100.0%

2010 8 6 75.0% 2 25.0%2010 8 6 75.0% 2 25.0%

2011 3 3 100.0% 2 66.7%

2012 4 3 75.0%

Toledo 2007 718 486 67.7% 276 38.4%

2008 806 562 69.7% 340 42.2%

2009 1,140 799 70.1% 443 38.9%

2010 1,295 835 64.5% 464 35.8%

2011 933 555 59.5% 290 31.1%

2012 948 606 63.9%

45








Walbridge 2007 28 25 89.3% 13 46.4%

2008 39 33 84.6% 18 46.2%

2009 29 23 79.3% 14 48.3%

2010 35 29 82.9% 14 40.0%

2011 27 20 74.1% 14 51.9%

2012 27 19 70.4%

Waterville 2007 20 14 70.0% 11 55.0%

2008 9 8 88.9% 6 66.7%

2009 11 8 72 7% 2 18 2%2009 11 8 72.7% 2 18.2%

2010 13 10 76.9% 11 84.6%

2011 19 12 63.2% 13 68.4%

2012 20 16 80.0%

Wauseon 2007 10 9 90.0% 8 80.0%

2008 9 5 55.6% 4 44.4%

2009 16 13 81.3% 7 43.8%2009 16 13 81.3% 7 43.8%

2010 16 10 62.5% 6 37.5%

2011 4 3 75.0% 2 50.0%

2012 17 13 76.5%

Whitehouse 2007 16 13 81.3% 7 43.8%

2008 18 17 94.4% 14 77.8%

2009 18 12 66.7% 8 44.4%

2010 20 15 75 0% 14 70 0%2010 20 15 75.0% 14 70.0%

2011 14 10 71.4% 5 35.7%

2012 10 10 100.0%

Woodville 2007 7 6 85.7% 6 85.7%

2008 7 5 71.4% 5 71.4%

2009 7 6 85.7% 5 71.4%

2010 14 8 57.1% 3 21.4%2010 14 8 57.1% 3 21.4%

2011 4 3 75.0% 3 75.0%

2012 7 5 71.4%

All Cities Other 2007 906 670 74.0% 484 53.4%

Than Toledo 2008 878 684 77.9% 467 53.2%

2009 1,130 822 72.7% 543 48.1%

2010 1,079 832 77.1% 527 48.8%

2011 911 645 70.8% 428 47.0%

2012 862 630 73.1%

46





by Target Majors (Toledo Campus)

High School GPA

by Target Majors (Toledo Campus)

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 83.3% 76.9% 77.9% 74.1% 69.6% 58.0%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 83.3% 76.9% 77.9% 74.1% 69.6% 58.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 70.8% 72.0% 60.3% 60.2% 51.5% 63.3%

Crim. Just. Tech. 67.2% 76.5% 76.5% 63.3% 62.0% 68.5%

Pre‐Nurs. Concentration 74.3% 77.5% 75.1% 73.9% 67.3% 71.5%

Social Work Concentration 73.9% 71.0% 73.0% 71.6% 66.1% 55.7%

All Other Majors 70.9% 74.0% 71.2% 71.2% 66.1% 70.0%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 83.3% 76.9% 77.9% 74.1% 69.6% 58.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 70.8% 72.0% 60.3% 60.2% 51.5% 63.3%

Crim. Just. Tech. 67.2% 76.5% 76.5% 63.3% 62.0% 68.5%



All Other Majors 70.9% 74.0% 71.2% 71.2% 66.1% 70.0%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 83.3% 76.9% 77.9% 74.1% 69.6% 58.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 70.8% 72.0% 60.3% 60.2% 51.5% 63.3%

Crim. Just. Tech. 67.2% 76.5% 76.5% 63.3% 62.0% 68.5%



All Other Majors 70.9% 74.0% 71.2% 71.2% 66.1% 70.0%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

AA General Conc. 58.3% 50.0% 39.7% 40.7% 35.9%

Bus Mgt Tech 41 7% 39 3% 35 1% 29 8% 25 4%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 83.3% 76.9% 77.9% 74.1% 69.6% 58.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 70.8% 72.0% 60.3% 60.2% 51.5% 63.3%

Crim. Just. Tech. 67.2% 76.5% 76.5% 63.3% 62.0% 68.5%



All Other Majors 70.9% 74.0% 71.2% 71.2% 66.1% 70.0%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

AA General Conc. 58.3% 50.0% 39.7% 40.7% 35.9%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 41.7% 39.3% 35.1% 29.8% 25.4%

Crim. Just. Tech. 44.8% 38.8% 46.1% 43.5% 33.3%

Pre‐Nurs. Concentration 47.6% 54.0% 50.6% 38.3% 55.4%

Social Work Concentration 39.1% 41.9% 27.0% 43.2% 38.7%

All Other Majors 46.9% 49.2% 43.4% 43.0% 39.7%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


47





by High Enrolling Target Majors (Toledo Campus)

Major Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

AA General Concentration 2007 48 40 83.3% 28 58.3%

2008 52 40 76.9% 26 50.0%

2009 68 53 77.9% 27 39.7%

2010 108 80 74.1% 44 40.7%

2011 92 64 69.6% 33 35.9%

2012 119 69 58.0%

Business Management Technology 2007 72 51 70.8% 30 41.7%


g gy

2008 107 77 72.0% 42 39.3%

2009 131 79 60.3% 46 35.1%

2010 171 103 60.2% 51 29.8%

2011 130 67 51.5% 33 25.4%

2012 90 57 63.3%

Criminal Justice Technology 2007 67 45 67.2% 30 44.8%

2008 85 65 76.5% 33 38.8%

2009 102 78 76.5% 47 46.1%

2010 147 93 63.3% 64 43.5%2010 147 93 63.3% 64 43.5%

2011 129 80 62.0% 43 33.3%

2012 108 74 68.5%

Pre‐Nursing Concentration 2007 191 142 74.3% 91 47.6%

2008 200 155 77.5% 108 54.0%

2009 233 175 75.1% 118 50.6%

2010 115 85 73.9% 44 38.3%

2011 101 68 67.3% 56 55.4%

2012 137 98 71.5%

Social Work Concentration 2007 23 17 73 9% 9 39 1%Social Work Concentration 2007 23 17 73.9% 9 39.1%

2008 31 22 71.0% 13 41.9%

2009 37 27 73.0% 10 27.0%

2010 74 53 71.6% 32 43.2%

2011 62 41 66.1% 24 38.7%

2012 79 44 55.7%

All Other Majors 2007 1,414 1,003 70.9% 663 46.9%

2008 1,409 1,042 74.0% 693 49.2%

2009 1,699 1,209 71.2% 738 43.4%

2010 1,759 1,253 71.2% 756 43.0%

2011 1,331 880 66.1% 529 39.7%

2012 1,277 894 70.0%

48

Findlay Campus

49





by Gender (Findlay Campus)

85%

90%

95%


60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.9% 79.0% 76.0% 71.0% 65.4% 74.9%

Male 74.6% 68.8% 72.0% 65.4% 60.9% 55.6%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.9% 79.0% 76.0% 71.0% 65.4% 74.9%

Male 74.6% 68.8% 72.0% 65.4% 60.9% 55.6%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.9% 79.0% 76.0% 71.0% 65.4% 74.9%

Male 74.6% 68.8% 72.0% 65.4% 60.9% 55.6%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female 74.9% 79.0% 76.0% 71.0% 65.4% 74.9%

Male 74.6% 68.8% 72.0% 65.4% 60.9% 55.6%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Female 59.5% 57.6% 52.3% 43.6% 47.6%

Male 50.3% 39.3% 42.8% 39.8% 39.1%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


50






Female 2007 227 170 74.9% 135 59.5%

2008 257 203 79.0% 148 57.6%

2009 287 218 76 0% 150 52 3%


by Gender (Findlay Campus)

2009 287 218 76.0% 150 52.3%

2010 314 223 71.0% 137 43.6%

2011 246 161 65.4% 117 47.6%

2012 183 137 74.9%

Male 2007 169 126 74.6% 85 50.3%

2008 173 119 68.8% 68 39.3%

2009 243 175 72.0% 104 42.8%2009 243 175 72.0% 104 42.8%

2010 246 161 65.4% 98 39.8%

2011 184 112 60.9% 72 39.1%

2012 151 84 55.6%

51





by Ethnicity (Findlay Campus)

70%

75%

80%

85%


45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 57.9% 68.2% 81.3% 48.1% 63.2% 46.7%

Hispanic 65.4% 70.4% 77.4% 64.4% 55.3% 41.4%

White 78.4% 75.1% 74.8% 70.6% 64.9% 70.7%

All Non‐White 55.6% 73.4% 71.4% 59.2% 57.1% 46.9%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 57.9% 68.2% 81.3% 48.1% 63.2% 46.7%

Hispanic 65.4% 70.4% 77.4% 64.4% 55.3% 41.4%

White 78.4% 75.1% 74.8% 70.6% 64.9% 70.7%

All Non‐White 55.6% 73.4% 71.4% 59.2% 57.1% 46.9%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


35%

40%

45%

50%

55%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 57.9% 68.2% 81.3% 48.1% 63.2% 46.7%

Hispanic 65.4% 70.4% 77.4% 64.4% 55.3% 41.4%

White 78.4% 75.1% 74.8% 70.6% 64.9% 70.7%

All Non‐White 55.6% 73.4% 71.4% 59.2% 57.1% 46.9%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 57.9% 68.2% 81.3% 48.1% 63.2% 46.7%

Hispanic 65.4% 70.4% 77.4% 64.4% 55.3% 41.4%

White 78.4% 75.1% 74.8% 70.6% 64.9% 70.7%

All Non‐White 55.6% 73.4% 71.4% 59.2% 57.1% 46.9%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 57.9% 45.5% 37.5% 18.5% 10.5%

Hispanic 46.2% 40.7% 41.9% 33.3% 34.2%

White 58.3% 51.6% 50.9% 44.4% 46.7%

All Non‐White 41.3% 42.2% 34.7% 30.6% 31.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 57.9% 68.2% 81.3% 48.1% 63.2% 46.7%

Hispanic 65.4% 70.4% 77.4% 64.4% 55.3% 41.4%

White 78.4% 75.1% 74.8% 70.6% 64.9% 70.7%

All Non‐White 55.6% 73.4% 71.4% 59.2% 57.1% 46.9%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 57.9% 45.5% 37.5% 18.5% 10.5%

Hispanic 46.2% 40.7% 41.9% 33.3% 34.2%

White 58.3% 51.6% 50.9% 44.4% 46.7%

All Non‐White 41.3% 42.2% 34.7% 30.6% 31.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%


52





by Ethnicity (Findlay Campus)


American Indian 2007

2008 3 3 100.0% 2 66.7%

2009 6 3 50.0% 1 16.7%

2010 4 3 75.0% 0.0%

2011 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0%

2012 2 2 100.0%

Asian 2007 3 0.0% 0.0%


2008 1 0.0% 0.0%

2009 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%

2010 6 4 66.7% 3 50.0%

2011 2 2 100.0% 2 100.0%

2012 5 4 80.0%

Black 2007 19 11 57.9% 11 57.9%

2008 22 15 68.2% 10 45.5%

2009 16 13 81.3% 6 37.5%

2010 27 13 48.1% 5 18.5%2010 27 13 48.1% 5 18.5%

2011 19 12 63.2% 2 10.5%

2012 15 7 46.7%

Hispanic 2007 26 17 65.4% 12 46.2%

2008 27 19 70.4% 11 40.7%

2009 31 24 77.4% 13 41.9%

2010 45 29 64.4% 15 33.3%

2011 38 21 55.3% 13 34.2%

2012 29 12 41.4%

Pacific Islander 2007Pacific Islander 2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

White 2007 333 261 78.4% 194 58.3%

2008 366 275 75.1% 189 51.6%

2009 432 323 74.8% 220 50.9%

2010 462 326 70.6% 205 44.4%

2011 353 229 64.9% 165 46.7%

2012 270 191 70.7%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 8 2 25.0% 3 37.5%

2011 13 6 46.2% 5 38.5%

2012 7 2 28.6%


Unknown 2007 15 7 46.7% 3 20.0%

2008 11 10 90.9% 4 36.4%

2009 40 26 65.0% 13 32.5%

2010 8 7 87.5% 4 50.0%

2011 4 2 50.0% 1 25.0%

2012 6 3 50.0%

All Non‐White 2007 63 35 55.6% 26 41.3%

2008 64 47 73.4% 27 42.2%

2009 98 70 71.4% 34 34.7%2009 98 70 71.4% 34 34.7%

2010 98 58 59.2% 30 30.6%

2011 77 44 57.1% 24 31.2%

2012 64 30 46.9%


53





by Gender & Ethnicity (Findlay Campus)

70%75%80%85%90%


50%

60%

70%


25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 58.3% 78.6% 90.0% 50.0% 62.5% 28.6%

Hispanic 62.5% 83.3% 70.6% 68.0% 57.1% 58.3%

White 78.8% 78.1% 77.4% 71.7% 66.5% 77.8%

All Non‐White 55.3% 83.3% 69.2% 66.7% 60.0% 60.0%

25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 75.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16.7% 12.5%

Hispanic 56.3% 44.4% 35.3% 28.0% 47.6%

White 60.8% 59.5% 56.2% 45.6% 48.5%

All Non‐White 52.6% 47.6% 34.6% 31.0% 42.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 58.3% 78.6% 90.0% 50.0% 62.5% 28.6%

Hispanic 62.5% 83.3% 70.6% 68.0% 57.1% 58.3%

White 78.8% 78.1% 77.4% 71.7% 66.5% 77.8%

All Non‐White 55.3% 83.3% 69.2% 66.7% 60.0% 60.0%

25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


70%75%80%85%90%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 75.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16.7% 12.5%

Hispanic 56.3% 44.4% 35.3% 28.0% 47.6%

White 60.8% 59.5% 56.2% 45.6% 48.5%

All Non‐White 52.6% 47.6% 34.6% 31.0% 42.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


50%

60%

70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 58.3% 78.6% 90.0% 50.0% 62.5% 28.6%

Hispanic 62.5% 83.3% 70.6% 68.0% 57.1% 58.3%

White 78.8% 78.1% 77.4% 71.7% 66.5% 77.8%

All Non‐White 55.3% 83.3% 69.2% 66.7% 60.0% 60.0%

25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201225%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 75.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16.7% 12.5%

Hispanic 56.3% 44.4% 35.3% 28.0% 47.6%

White 60.8% 59.5% 56.2% 45.6% 48.5%

All Non‐White 52.6% 47.6% 34.6% 31.0% 42.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 58.3% 78.6% 90.0% 50.0% 62.5% 28.6%

Hispanic 62.5% 83.3% 70.6% 68.0% 57.1% 58.3%

White 78.8% 78.1% 77.4% 71.7% 66.5% 77.8%

All Non‐White 55.3% 83.3% 69.2% 66.7% 60.0% 60.0%

25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 57.1% 50.0% 66.7% 47.6% 63.6% 62.5%

Hispanic 70.0% 44.4% 85.7% 60.0% 52.9% 29.4%

White 77.8% 70.9% 71.6% 68.9% 62.6% 61.5%

All Non‐White 56.0% 54.5% 73.9% 53.6% 54.1% 35.3%

25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 75.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16.7% 12.5%

Hispanic 56.3% 44.4% 35.3% 28.0% 47.6%

White 60.8% 59.5% 56.2% 45.6% 48.5%

All Non‐White 52.6% 47.6% 34.6% 31.0% 42.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 28.6% 37.5% 16.7% 19.0% 9.1%

Hispanic 30.0% 33.3% 50.0% 40.0% 17.6%

White 54.9% 40.4% 44.7% 42.6% 44.2%

All Non‐White 24.0% 31.8% 34.8% 30.4% 18.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 58.3% 78.6% 90.0% 50.0% 62.5% 28.6%

Hispanic 62.5% 83.3% 70.6% 68.0% 57.1% 58.3%

White 78.8% 78.1% 77.4% 71.7% 66.5% 77.8%

All Non‐White 55.3% 83.3% 69.2% 66.7% 60.0% 60.0%

25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Black 57.1% 50.0% 66.7% 47.6% 63.6% 62.5%

Hispanic 70.0% 44.4% 85.7% 60.0% 52.9% 29.4%

White 77.8% 70.9% 71.6% 68.9% 62.6% 61.5%

All Non‐White 56.0% 54.5% 73.9% 53.6% 54.1% 35.3%

25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 75.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16.7% 12.5%

Hispanic 56.3% 44.4% 35.3% 28.0% 47.6%

White 60.8% 59.5% 56.2% 45.6% 48.5%

All Non‐White 52.6% 47.6% 34.6% 31.0% 42.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Black 28.6% 37.5% 16.7% 19.0% 9.1%

Hispanic 30.0% 33.3% 50.0% 40.0% 17.6%

White 54.9% 40.4% 44.7% 42.6% 44.2%

All Non‐White 24.0% 31.8% 34.8% 30.4% 18.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


54







Female American Indian 2007

2008 3 3 100.0% 2 66.7%

2009 2 1 50.0% 0.0%

2010 1 1 100.0% 0.0%

2011

2012 2 2 100.0%

Asian 2007 2 0.0% 0.0%

2008


2008

2009 2 2 100.0% 0.0%

2010 3 2 66.7% 2 66.7%

2011 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0%

2012 3 3 100.0%

Black 2007 12 7 58.3% 9 75.0%

2008 14 11 78.6% 7 50.0%

2009 10 9 90.0% 5 50.0%

2010 6 3 50.0% 1 16.7%

2011 8 5 62 5% 1 12 5%2011 8 5 62.5% 1 12.5%

2012 7 2 28.6%

Hispanic 2007 16 10 62.5% 9 56.3%

2008 18 15 83.3% 8 44.4%

2009 17 12 70.6% 6 35.3%

2010 25 17 68.0% 7 28.0%

2011 21 12 57.1% 10 47.6%

2012 12 7 58.3%


20082008

2009

2010

2011

2012

White 2007 189 149 78.8% 115 60.8%

2008 215 168 78.1% 128 59.5%

2009 235 182 77.4% 132 56.2%

2010 272 195 71.7% 124 45.6%

2011 206 137 66 5% 100 48 5%2011 206 137 66.5% 100 48.5%

2012 153 119 77.8%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%

2011 7 4 57.1% 4 57.1%

2012 4 2 50.0%

Unknown 2007 8 4 50.0% 2 25.0%

2008 7 6 85 7% 3 42 9%


2008 7 6 85.7% 3 42.9%

2009 21 12 57.1% 7 33.3%

2010 5 4 80.0% 2 40.0%

2011 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%

2012 2 2 100.0%

All Non‐White 2007 38 21 55.3% 20 52.6%

2008 42 35 83.3% 20 47.6%

2009 52 36 69.2% 18 34.6%

2010 42 28 66.7% 13 31.0%

2011 40 24 60 0% 17 42 5%2011 40 24 60.0% 17 42.5%

2012 30 18 60.0%

55








Male American Indian 2007

2008

2009 4 2 50.0% 1 25.0%

2010 3 2 66.7% 0.0%

2011 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0%

2012

Asian 2007 1 0.0% 0.0%

2008 1 0 0% 0 0%2008 1 0.0% 0.0%

2009 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%

2010 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%

2011 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0%

2012 2 1 50.0%

Black 2007 7 4 57.1% 2 28.6%

2008 8 4 50.0% 3 37.5%

2009 6 4 66.7% 1 16.7%

2010 21 10 47.6% 4 19.0%

2011 11 7 63 6% 1 9 1%2011 11 7 63.6% 1 9.1%

2012 8 5 62.5%

Hispanic 2007 10 7 70.0% 3 30.0%

2008 9 4 44.4% 3 33.3%

2009 14 12 85.7% 7 50.0%

2010 20 12 60.0% 8 40.0%

2011 17 9 52.9% 3 17.6%

2012 17 5 29.4%


20082008

2009

2010

2011

2012

White 2007 144 112 77.8% 79 54.9%

2008 151 107 70.9% 61 40.4%

2009 197 141 71.6% 88 44.7%

2010 190 131 68.9% 81 42.6%

2011 147 92 62 6% 65 44 2%2011 147 92 62.6% 65 44.2%

2012 117 72 61.5%

Multi‐Racial 2007

2008

2009

2010 6 1 16.7% 2 33.3%

2011 6 2 33.3% 1 16.7%

2012 3 0 0.0%

Unknown 2007 7 3 42.9% 1 14.3%

2008 4 4 100 0% 1 25 0%


2008 4 4 100.0% 1 25.0%

2009 19 14 73.7% 6 31.6%

2010 3 3 100.0% 2 66.7%

2011 1 0.0% 0 0.0%

2012 4 1 25.0%

All Non‐White 2007 25 14 56.0% 6 24.0%

2008 22 12 54.5% 7 31.8%

2009 46 34 73.9% 16 34.8%

2010 56 30 53.6% 17 30.4%

2011 37 20 54 1% 7 18 9%2011 37 20 54.1% 7 18.9%

2012 34 12 35.3%


56





b A (Fi dl C )by Age (Findlay Campus)

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201240%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 55.6% 80.0% 83.3% 75.0% 66.7% 40.0%

18 79.5% 82.4% 80.5% 78.1% 75.7% 74.2%

19 ‐ 25 67.5% 62.7% 68.3% 63.4% 52.9% 59.7%

Above 25 81.8% 81.4% 75.5% 67.9% 63.4% 65.7%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 55.6% 80.0% 83.3% 75.0% 66.7% 40.0%

18 79.5% 82.4% 80.5% 78.1% 75.7% 74.2%

19 ‐ 25 67.5% 62.7% 68.3% 63.4% 52.9% 59.7%

Above 25 81.8% 81.4% 75.5% 67.9% 63.4% 65.7%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 55.6% 80.0% 83.3% 75.0% 66.7% 40.0%

18 79.5% 82.4% 80.5% 78.1% 75.7% 74.2%

19 ‐ 25 67.5% 62.7% 68.3% 63.4% 52.9% 59.7%

Above 25 81.8% 81.4% 75.5% 67.9% 63.4% 65.7%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Less than 18 55 6% 40 0% 83 3% 75 0% 50 0%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Less than 18 55.6% 80.0% 83.3% 75.0% 66.7% 40.0%

18 79.5% 82.4% 80.5% 78.1% 75.7% 74.2%

19 ‐ 25 67.5% 62.7% 68.3% 63.4% 52.9% 59.7%

Above 25 81.8% 81.4% 75.5% 67.9% 63.4% 65.7%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Less than 18 55.6% 40.0% 83.3% 75.0% 50.0%

18 60.9% 54.7% 57.9% 50.0% 54.4%

19 ‐ 25 45.5% 40.5% 35.3% 33.3% 38.9%

Above 25 64.9% 58.8% 54.7% 45.1% 38.9%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%


57






Less than 18 2007 9 5 55.6% 5 55.6%

2008 5 4 80.0% 2 40.0%

2009 6 5 83 3% 5 83 3%


by Age (Findlay Campus)

2009 6 5 83.3% 5 83.3%

2010 4 3 75.0% 3 75.0%

2011 6 4 66.7% 3 50.0%

2012 5 2 40.0%

18 2007 156 124 79.5% 95 60.9%

2008 170 140 82.4% 93 54.7%

2009 164 132 80.5% 95 57.9%2009 164 132 80.5% 95 57.9%

2010 128 100 78.1% 64 50.0%

2011 136 103 75.7% 74 54.4%

2012 128 95 74.2%

19 ‐ 25 2007 154 104 67.5% 70 45.5%

2008 158 99 62.7% 64 40.5%

2009 221 151 68.3% 78 35.3%

20 0 2 3 3 63 % 33 3%2010 213 135 63.4% 71 33.3%

2011 157 83 52.9% 61 38.9%

2012 134 80 59.7%

Above 25 2007 77 63 81.8% 50 64.9%

2008 97 79 81.4% 57 58.8%

2009 139 105 75.5% 76 54.7%

2010 215 146 67.9% 97 45.1%2010 215 146 67.9% 97 45.1%

2011 131 83 63.4% 51 38.9%

2012 67 44 65.7%

58





by Full‐Time/Part‐Time Status (Findlay Campus)by Full‐Time/Part‐Time Status (Findlay Campus)

85%

90%

95%


60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 77.6% 83.3% 80.3% 71.5% 67.2% 70.6%

Part‐Time 68.1% 56.9% 53.7% 57.9% 55.9% 57.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 77.6% 83.3% 80.3% 71.5% 67.2% 70.6%

Part‐Time 68.1% 56.9% 53.7% 57.9% 55.9% 57.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 77.6% 83.3% 80.3% 71.5% 67.2% 70.6%

Part‐Time 68.1% 56.9% 53.7% 57.9% 55.9% 57.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%




2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Full‐Time 77.6% 83.3% 80.3% 71.5% 67.2% 70.6%

Part‐Time 68.1% 56.9% 53.7% 57.9% 55.9% 57.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Full‐Time 59.2% 57.0% 51.8% 43.5% 46.0%

Part‐Time 47.1% 35.8% 35.0% 36.4% 39.9%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


59





/

Status Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Full‐Time 2007 277 215 77.6% 164 59.2%

2008 293 244 83.3% 167 57.0%

2009 407 327 80 3% 211 51 8%


by Full‐Time/Part‐Time Status (Findlay Campus)

2009 407 327 80.3% 211 51.8%

2010 439 314 71.5% 191 43.5%

2011 287 193 67.2% 132 46.0%

2012 218 154 70.6%

Part‐Time 2007 119 81 68.1% 56 47.1%

2008 137 78 56.9% 49 35.8%

2009 123 66 53.7% 43 35.0%2009 123 66 53.7% 43 35.0%

2010 121 70 57.9% 44 36.4%

2011 143 80 55.9% 57 39.9%

2012 116 67 57.8%



60





by High School GPA (Findlay Campus)

High School GPA


65%

70%75%80%85%90%95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Bl k

40%45%50%55%60%65%

70%75%80%85%90%95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 57.6% 59.0% 62.6% 57.9% 52.7%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 63.6% 71.2% 67.2% 64.1% 54.7% 43.6%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 77.7% 75.3% 79.4% 72.1% 63.5% 73.1%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 88.2% 91.7% 83.5% 87.1% 83.5% 78.5%

All Students <= 2.22 66.7% 68.5% 72.2% 69.5% 53.2% 52.2%

40%45%50%55%60%65%

70%75%80%85%90%95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 57.6% 59.0% 62.6% 57.9% 52.7%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 63.6% 71.2% 67.2% 64.1% 54.7% 43.6%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 77.7% 75.3% 79.4% 72.1% 63.5% 73.1%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 88.2% 91.7% 83.5% 87.1% 83.5% 78.5%

All Students <= 2.22 66.7% 68.5% 72.2% 69.5% 53.2% 52.2%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%

75%80%85%90%95%


45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 57.6% 59.0% 62.6% 57.9% 52.7%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 63.6% 71.2% 67.2% 64.1% 54.7% 43.6%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 77.7% 75.3% 79.4% 72.1% 63.5% 73.1%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 88.2% 91.7% 83.5% 87.1% 83.5% 78.5%

All Students <= 2.22 66.7% 68.5% 72.2% 69.5% 53.2% 52.2%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%

75%80%85%90%95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Blank 37.6% 31.4% 36.7% 33.7% 29.0%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Blank 57.6% 59.0% 62.6% 57.9% 52.7%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 63.6% 71.2% 67.2% 64.1% 54.7% 43.6%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 77.7% 75.3% 79.4% 72.1% 63.5% 73.1%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 88.2% 91.7% 83.5% 87.1% 83.5% 78.5%

All Students <= 2.22 66.7% 68.5% 72.2% 69.5% 53.2% 52.2%

40%45%50%55%60%65%70%

75%80%85%90%95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Blank 37.6% 31.4% 36.7% 33.7% 29.0%

1.01 ‐ 2.00 43.2% 47.5% 31.0% 34.6% 35.8%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 58.0% 46.2% 50.5% 44.1% 40.5%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 70.9% 75.9% 67.0% 60.4% 74.2%

All Students <= 2.22 46.4% 40.4% 35.1% 39.0% 30.4%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%


61







Blank 2007 85 49 57.6% 32 37.6%

2008 105 62 59.0% 33 31.4%

2009 147 92 62.6% 54 36.7%

2010 202 117 57.9% 68 33.7%

2011 131 69 52.7% 38 29.0%

2012 73 38 52.1%

<= 1.00 2007


<= 1.00 2007

2008

2009 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%

2010

2011 1 0.0% 0.0%

2012

1.01 ‐ 2.00 2007 44 28 63.6% 19 43.2%

2008 59 42 71.2% 28 47.5%

2009 58 39 67.2% 18 31.0%

2010 78 50 64 1% 27 34 6%2010 78 50 64.1% 27 34.6%

2011 53 29 54.7% 19 35.8%

2012 39 17 43.6%

2.01 ‐ 3.00 2007 157 122 77.7% 91 58.0%

2008 158 119 75.3% 73 46.2%

2009 214 170 79.4% 108 50.5%

2010 179 129 72.1% 79 44.1%

2011 148 94 63.5% 60 40.5%

2012 156 114 73.1%

3.01 ‐ 4.00 2007 110 97 88.2% 78 70.9%

2008 108 99 91.7% 82 75.9%

2009 109 91 83.5% 73 67.0%

2010 101 88 87.1% 61 60.4%

2011 97 81 83.5% 72 74.2%

2012 65 51 78.5%

>= 4.00 2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012 1 1 100.0%

All Students <= 2.22 2007 69 46 66.7% 32 46.4%

2008 89 61 68.5% 36 40.4%

2009 97 70 72.2% 34 35.1%

2010 118 82 69.5% 46 39.0%

2011 79 42 53.2% 24 30.4%

2012 67 35 52.2%2012 67 35 52.2%

62





by EFC Range (Findlay Campus)by EFC Range (Findlay Campus)

65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100% Fall‐to‐Spring Retention

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 73.7% 75.8% 73.0% 64.6% 56.1% 59.6%

501 ‐ 1900 93.3% 80.6% 69.4% 71.1% 69.0% 65.2%

1901 3400 75 9% 82 8% 77 1% 76 5% 78 1% 79 2%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 73.7% 75.8% 73.0% 64.6% 56.1% 59.6%

501 ‐ 1900 93.3% 80.6% 69.4% 71.1% 69.0% 65.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 75.9% 82.8% 77.1% 76.5% 78.1% 79.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 77.8% 66.7% 77.8% 90.9% 80.0% 66.7%

4401 ‐ 5273 71.4% 84.6% 93.3% 86.7% 85.7% 83.3%

5274 and Up 89.6% 84.8% 85.0% 76.7% 76.0% 73.8%

Blank 54.5% 54.4% 57.7% 53.8% 57.1% 68.2%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 73.7% 75.8% 73.0% 64.6% 56.1% 59.6%

501 ‐ 1900 93.3% 80.6% 69.4% 71.1% 69.0% 65.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 75.9% 82.8% 77.1% 76.5% 78.1% 79.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 77.8% 66.7% 77.8% 90.9% 80.0% 66.7%

4401 ‐ 5273 71.4% 84.6% 93.3% 86.7% 85.7% 83.3%

5274 and Up 89.6% 84.8% 85.0% 76.7% 76.0% 73.8%

Blank 54.5% 54.4% 57.7% 53.8% 57.1% 68.2%


35%

45%

55%

65%

75%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 73.7% 75.8% 73.0% 64.6% 56.1% 59.6%

501 ‐ 1900 93.3% 80.6% 69.4% 71.1% 69.0% 65.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 75.9% 82.8% 77.1% 76.5% 78.1% 79.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 77.8% 66.7% 77.8% 90.9% 80.0% 66.7%

4401 ‐ 5273 71.4% 84.6% 93.3% 86.7% 85.7% 83.3%

5274 and Up 89.6% 84.8% 85.0% 76.7% 76.0% 73.8%

Blank 54.5% 54.4% 57.7% 53.8% 57.1% 68.2%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 44.7% 48.4% 42.3% 33.2% 34.2%

501 ‐ 1900 80.0% 55.6% 44.4% 34.2% 48.3%

1901 ‐ 3400 58.6% 51.7% 48.6% 52.9% 46.9%

3401 ‐ 4400 66 7% 40 0% 55 6% 63 6% 66 7%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%




h A SA S d i h l C h hi h fi i l d d li ibl f

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 73.7% 75.8% 73.0% 64.6% 56.1% 59.6%

501 ‐ 1900 93.3% 80.6% 69.4% 71.1% 69.0% 65.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 75.9% 82.8% 77.1% 76.5% 78.1% 79.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 77.8% 66.7% 77.8% 90.9% 80.0% 66.7%

4401 ‐ 5273 71.4% 84.6% 93.3% 86.7% 85.7% 83.3%

5274 and Up 89.6% 84.8% 85.0% 76.7% 76.0% 73.8%

Blank 54.5% 54.4% 57.7% 53.8% 57.1% 68.2%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 44.7% 48.4% 42.3% 33.2% 34.2%

501 ‐ 1900 80.0% 55.6% 44.4% 34.2% 48.3%

1901 ‐ 3400 58.6% 51.7% 48.6% 52.9% 46.9%

3401 ‐ 4400 66.7% 40.0% 55.6% 63.6% 66.7%

4401 ‐ 5273 28.6% 53.8% 73.3% 66.7% 85.7%

5274 and Up 71.7% 63.8% 68.2% 55.6% 66.7%

Blank 43.6% 34.2% 31.0% 59.0% 37.1%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%




2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 ‐ 500 73.7% 75.8% 73.0% 64.6% 56.1% 59.6%

501 ‐ 1900 93.3% 80.6% 69.4% 71.1% 69.0% 65.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 75.9% 82.8% 77.1% 76.5% 78.1% 79.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 77.8% 66.7% 77.8% 90.9% 80.0% 66.7%

4401 ‐ 5273 71.4% 84.6% 93.3% 86.7% 85.7% 83.3%

5274 and Up 89.6% 84.8% 85.0% 76.7% 76.0% 73.8%

Blank 54.5% 54.4% 57.7% 53.8% 57.1% 68.2%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0 ‐ 500 44.7% 48.4% 42.3% 33.2% 34.2%

501 ‐ 1900 80.0% 55.6% 44.4% 34.2% 48.3%

1901 ‐ 3400 58.6% 51.7% 48.6% 52.9% 46.9%

3401 ‐ 4400 66.7% 40.0% 55.6% 63.6% 66.7%

4401 ‐ 5273 28.6% 53.8% 73.3% 66.7% 85.7%

5274 and Up 71.7% 63.8% 68.2% 55.6% 66.7%

Blank 43.6% 34.2% 31.0% 59.0% 37.1%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%


63





by EFC Range (Findlay Campus)


0 ‐ 500 2007 114 84 73.7% 51 44.7%

2008 153 116 75.8% 74 48.4%

2009 248 181 73.0% 105 42.3%

2010 322 208 64.6% 107 33.2%

2011 237 133 56.1% 81 34.2%


2012 161 96 59.6%

501 ‐ 1900 2007 30 28 93.3% 24 80.0%

2008 36 29 80.6% 20 55.6%

2009 36 25 69.4% 16 44.4%

2010 38 27 71.1% 13 34.2%

2011 29 20 69.0% 14 48.3%

2012 23 15 65.2%

1901 ‐ 3400 2007 29 22 75.9% 17 58.6%1901 3400 2007 29 22 75.9% 17 58.6%

2008 29 24 82.8% 15 51.7%

2009 35 27 77.1% 17 48.6%

2010 34 26 76.5% 18 52.9%

2011 32 25 78.1% 15 46.9%

2012 24 19 79.2%

3401 ‐ 4400 2007 9 7 77.8% 6 66.7%

2008 15 10 66.7% 6 40.0%

2009 18 14 77 8% 10 55 6%2009 18 14 77.8% 10 55.6%

2010 22 20 90.9% 14 63.6%

2011 15 12 80.0% 10 66.7%

2012 18 12 66.7%

4401 ‐ 5273 2007 7 5 71.4% 2 28.6%

2008 13 11 84.6% 7 53.8%

2009 15 14 93.3% 11 73.3%

2010 15 13 86.7% 10 66.7%

2011 7 6 85.7% 6 85.7%

2012 6 5 83.3%

5274 and Up 2007 106 95 89.6% 76 71.7%

2008 105 89 84.8% 67 63.8%

2009 107 91 85.0% 73 68.2%

2010 90 69 76.7% 50 55.6%

2011 75 57 76.0% 50 66.7%

2012 80 59 73.8%2012 80 59 73.8%

Blank 2007 101 55 54.5% 44 43.6%

2008 79 43 54.4% 27 34.2%

2009 71 41 57.7% 22 31.0%

2010 39 21 53.8% 23 59.0%

2011 35 20 57.1% 13 37.1%

2012 22 15 68.2%


f d ' b l f ll d l l d b d f d destimate of students' ability to pay for college and is calculated based on information provided



64





b Hi h S h l (Fi dl C )by High School (Findlay Campus)

85%

90%

95%


55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 66.7% 77.4% 73.0% 62.2% 69.5% 65.8%

Fostoria 75.0% 73.5% 75.0% 66.7% 67.9% 60.0%

All Other High Schools 76.3% 74.6% 74.3% 70.0% 62.5% 66.8%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 66.7% 77.4% 73.0% 62.2% 69.5% 65.8%

Fostoria 75.0% 73.5% 75.0% 66.7% 67.9% 60.0%


50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 66.7% 77.4% 73.0% 62.2% 69.5% 65.8%

Fostoria 75.0% 73.5% 75.0% 66.7% 67.9% 60.0%


50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 201120%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Findlay 66.7% 77.4% 73.0% 62.2% 69.5% 65.8%

Fostoria 75.0% 73.5% 75.0% 66.7% 67.9% 60.0%


50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Findlay 45.0% 41.9% 43.8% 31.7% 47.5%

Fostoria 60.0% 50.0% 36.1% 48.9% 50.0%

All Other High Schools 57.3% 51.8% 49.9% 43.2% 42.7%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


65





High School Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

Arcadia High School 2007 3 3 100.0% 1 33.3%

2008 9 7 77.8% 3 33.3%

2009 14 11 78 6% 9 64 3%


by High School (Findlay Campus)

2009 14 11 78.6% 9 64.3%

2010 8 7 87.5% 6 75.0%

2011 11 9 81.8% 8 72.7%

2012 5 4 80.0%

Arlington High School 2007 10 8 80.0% 5 50.0%

2008 5 5 100.0% 3 60.0%

2009 12 11 91.7% 10 83.3%2009 12 11 91.7% 10 83.3%

2010 6 3 50.0% 1 16.7%

2011 7 5 71.4% 3 42.9%

2012 8 7 87.5%

Carey High School 2007 15 11 73.3% 5 33.3%

2008 14 12 85.7% 9 64.3%

2009 11 11 100.0% 7 63.6%

20 0 2 9 % %2010 12 11 91.7% 5 41.7%

2011 9 8 88.9% 7 77.8%

2012 5 4 80.0%

Columbian High School 2007 15 13 86.7% 9 60.0%

2008 25 21 84.0% 17 68.0%

2009 11 9 81.8% 5 45.5%

2010 15 13 86.7% 5 33.3%2010 15 13 86.7% 5 33.3%

2011 11 3 27.3% 0.0%

2012 10 9 90.0% 0.0%

Cory Rawson High School 2007 11 10 90.9% 11 100.0%

2008 5 4 80.0% 3 60.0%

2009 12 10 83.3% 6 50.0%

2010 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%

2011 2 1 50.0% 0.0%

2012 3 2 66.7% 0.0%

Elmwood High School 2007 9 6 66.7% 4 44.4%

2008 11 10 90.9% 7 63.6%

2009 15 12 80.0% 8 53.3%

2010 13 9 69.2% 7 53.8%

2011 18 12 66 7% 10 55 6%2011 18 12 66.7% 10 55.6%

2012 8 6 75.0%

66








Findlay Senior High School 2007 60 40 66.7% 27 45.0%

2008 62 48 77.4% 26 41.9%

2009 89 65 73 0% 39 43 8%2009 89 65 73.0% 39 43.8%

2010 82 51 62.2% 26 31.7%

2011 59 41 69.5% 28 47.5%

2012 73 48 65.8%

Fostoria High School 2007 20 15 75.0% 12 60.0%

2008 34 25 73.5% 17 50.0%

2009 36 27 75.0% 13 36.1%2009 36 27 75.0% 13 36.1%

2010 45 30 66.7% 22 48.9%

2011 28 19 67.9% 14 50.0%

2012 20 12 60.0%

G.E.D. 2007 37 21 56.8% 13 35.1%

2008 35 19 54.3% 13 37.1%

2009 75 48 64.0% 30 40.0%

20 0 98 9 60 2% 38 38 8%2010 98 59 60.2% 38 38.8%

2011 76 34 44.7% 18 23.7%

2012 41 20 48.8%

Hopewell Loudon High School 2007 7 7 100.0% 7 100.0%

2008 14 12 85.7% 11 78.6%

2009 9 8 88.9% 6 66.7%

2010 10 10 100.0% 8 80.0%2010 10 10 100.0% 8 80.0%

2011 5 5 100.0% 3 60.0%

2012 5 3 60.0%

Lakota High School 2007 13 11 84.6% 9 69.2%

2008 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%

2009 9 8 88.9% 7 77.8%

2010 7 5 71.4% 3 42.9%

2011 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%

2012 5 4 80.0%

Leipsic High School 2007 6 5 83.3% 4 66.7%

2008 7 6 85.7% 4 57.1%

2009 10 8 80.0% 6 60.0%

2010 7 6 85.7% 3 42.9%

2011 9 7 77 8% 5 55 6%2011 9 7 77.8% 5 55.6%

2012 5 4 80.0%

67








Liberty Benton High School 2007 4 4 100.0% 3 75.0%

2008 18 13 72.2% 8 44.4%

2009 19 19 100 0% 8 42 1%2009 19 19 100.0% 8 42.1%

2010 25 18 72.0% 12 48.0%

2011 10 7 70.0% 5 50.0%

2012 14 11 78.6%

Mccomb High School 2007 11 10 90.9% 7 63.6%

2008 15 13 86.7% 9 60.0%

2009 11 7 63.6% 5 45.5%2009 11 7 63.6% 5 45.5%

2010 13 10 76.9% 5 38.5%

2011 6 4 66.7% 1 16.7%

2012 9 6 66.7%

North Baltimore High School 2007 7 6 85.7% 3 42.9%

2008 14 11 78.6% 5 35.7%

2009 6 5 83.3% 3 50.0%

20 0 2 8 66 % %2010 12 8 66.7% 5 41.7%

2011 2 1 50.0% 0.0%

2012 6 5 83.3% 0.0%

Ottawa‐Glandorf High School 2007 9 6 66.7% 4 44.4%

2008 11 9 81.8% 8 72.7%

2009 8 4 50.0% 3 37.5%

2010 6 6 100.0% 5 83.3%2010 6 6 100.0% 5 83.3%

2011 7 4 57.1% 3 42.9%

2012 4 3 75.0%

Pandora Gilboa High School 2007 12 10 83.3% 10 83.3%

2008 2 2 100.0% 2 100.0%

2009

2010 3 3 100.0% 2 66.7%

2011 2 2 100.0% 2 100.0%

2012 4 3 75.0%

Riverdale High School 2007 12 9 75.0% 8 66.7%

2008 15 9 60.0% 3 20.0%

2009 11 5 45.5% 4 36.4%

2010 12 10 83.3% 7 58.3%

2011 13 7 53 8% 5 38 5%2011 13 7 53.8% 5 38.5%

2012 7 3 42.9%

68








Upper Sandusky High School 2007 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%

2008 11 8 72.7% 7 63.6%

2009 11 7 63 6% 6 54 5%2009 11 7 63.6% 6 54.5%

2010 9 6 66.7% 4 44.4%

2011 5 4 80.0% 3 60.0%

2012 1 0.0%

Van Buren Local High School 2007 10 8 80.0% 5 50.0%

2008 7 4 57.1% 4 57.1%

2009 19 13 68.4% 9 47.4%2009 19 13 68.4% 9 47.4%

2010 10 8 80.0% 4 40.0%

2011 13 11 84.6% 8 61.5%

2012 12 5 41.7%

Vanlue Local High School 2007 3 3 100.0% 2 66.7%

2008 10 6 60.0% 5 50.0%

2009 6 6 100.0% 6 100.0%

20 0 3 0% 2 0 0%2010 4 3 75.0% 2 50.0%

2011 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%

2012 1 1 100.0%

All High Schools Other Than 2007 316 241 76.3% 181 57.3%

Findlay & Fostoria 2008 334 249 74.6% 173 51.8%

2009 405 301 74.3% 202 49.9%

2010 433 303 70.0% 187 43.2%2010 433 303 70.0% 187 43.2%

2011 344 215 62.5% 147 42.7%

2012 241 161 66.8%

69





by Target Majors (Findlay Campus)

High School GPA

by Target Majors (Findlay Campus)

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 78.9% 65.2% 71.4% 63.0% 62.5% 80.0%

B M T h

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 78.9% 65.2% 71.4% 63.0% 62.5% 80.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 72.7% 71.9% 66.7% 55.1% 54.3% 66.7%

Crim. Just. Tech. 71.4% 81.8% 70.4% 53.8% 67.9% 57.1%

Pre‐Lic. Prac. Nrs. Cert. 88.9% 68.4% 79.2% 88.9% 62.5%


All Other Majors 71.3% 73.3% 74.3% 70.2% 64.4% 62.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 78.9% 65.2% 71.4% 63.0% 62.5% 80.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 72.7% 71.9% 66.7% 55.1% 54.3% 66.7%

Crim. Just. Tech. 71.4% 81.8% 70.4% 53.8% 67.9% 57.1%



All Other Majors 71.3% 73.3% 74.3% 70.2% 64.4% 62.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 78.9% 65.2% 71.4% 63.0% 62.5% 80.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 72.7% 71.9% 66.7% 55.1% 54.3% 66.7%

Crim. Just. Tech. 71.4% 81.8% 70.4% 53.8% 67.9% 57.1%



All Other Majors 71.3% 73.3% 74.3% 70.2% 64.4% 62.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

AA General Conc. 57.9% 34.8% 48.6% 37.0% 50.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 60.6% 37.5% 52.8% 38.8% 30.4%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AA General Conc. 78.9% 65.2% 71.4% 63.0% 62.5% 80.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 72.7% 71.9% 66.7% 55.1% 54.3% 66.7%

Crim. Just. Tech. 71.4% 81.8% 70.4% 53.8% 67.9% 57.1%



All Other Majors 71.3% 73.3% 74.3% 70.2% 64.4% 62.9%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

AA General Conc. 57.9% 34.8% 48.6% 37.0% 50.0%

Bus. Mgt. Tech. 60.6% 37.5% 52.8% 38.8% 30.4%

Crim. Just. Tech. 47.6% 54.5% 44.4% 30.8% 35.7%


Pre‐Nurs. Concentration 65.5% 57.4% 53.8% 52.0% 62.5%

All Other Majors 52.6% 50.2% 46.6% 42.6% 45.2%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%


70





by High‐Enrolling Target Majors (Findlay Campus)

Major Fall Cohort Year Initial Cohort Size # Retained % Retained # Retained % Retained

AA General Concentration 2007 19 15 78.9% 11 57.9%

2008 23 15 65.2% 8 34.8%

2009 35 25 71.4% 17 48.6%

2010 46 29 63.0% 17 37.0%

2011 32 20 62.5% 16 50.0%

2012 25 20 80.0%

Business Management Technology 2007 33 24 72.7% 20 60.6%


g gy

2008 32 23 71.9% 12 37.5%

2009 36 24 66.7% 19 52.8%

2010 49 27 55.1% 19 38.8%

2011 46 25 54.3% 14 30.4%

2012 36 24 66.7%

Criminal Justice Technology 2007 21 15 71.4% 10 47.6%

2008 33 27 81.8% 18 54.5%

2009 27 19 70.4% 12 44.4%

2010 39 21 53.8% 12 30.8%2010 39 21 53.8% 12 30.8%

2011 28 19 67.9% 10 35.7%

2012 28 16 57.1%

Pre‐License Practical Nrs Cert 2007 18 16 88.9% 11 61.1%

2008 19 13 68.4% 11 57.9%

2009 24 19 79.2% 11 45.8%

2010 18 16 88.9% 11 61.1%

2011 8 5 62.5% 2 25.0%

2012

Pre Nursing Concentration 2007 58 50 86 2% 38 65 5%Pre‐Nursing Concentration 2007 58 50 86.2% 38 65.5%

2008 68 57 83.8% 39 57.4%

2009 65 51 78.5% 35 53.8%

2010 25 22 88.0% 13 52.0%

2011 24 16 66.7% 15 62.5%

2012 35 29 82.9%

All Other Majors 2007 247 176 71.3% 130 52.6%

2008 255 187 73.3% 128 50.2%

2009 343 255 74.3% 160 46.6%

2010 383 269 70.2% 163 42.6%

2011 292 188 64.4% 132 45.2%

2012 210 132 62.9%

71

References The Integrated Postsecondary Data System Glossary. (n.d.). Retrieved March 14, 2012, from

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Glossary/ Noel, L., Levitz, R., & Saluri, D. (1985). Increasing Student Retention: Effective Programs and Practices for

Reducing the Dropout Rate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

72

14th day retention rates: first-time degree- and ... · of students who leave higher education...

Documents